Izetbegovic’s Vision for Bosnia: An Islamist Fascist State
by 4International writers: Nathan Pearlstein, Joshua Rosenberg, Max Rosenthal and Shlomo Baum
Quote from Adnan Jahic in Bosnian Weekly newspaper “Zmaj od Bosne”:
“The territory controlled by the Bosnian Army after the war will be a Muslim state. This is a desire of the Muslim people and, after all, our leaders: secular leader Alija Izetbegovic and religious leader Mustafa Ceric (the latter one in a private conversation with me confirmed that the old dream of Alija Izetbegovic, member of the organization “Young Muslims”, has been and remains the establishment of the Muslim state in Bosnia-Hercegovina; finally, his dream is close to realization and “he is not terribly upset because of that”).
Here is documented proof that the late Bosnian SDA party leader – Alija Izetbegovic – wanted an Islamist Fascist State of Bosnia & Herzegovina all along!!
Izetbegovic’s newly-elected minister in 1996 in the Bosnian parliament and head of the Islamofascist SDA party in Tuzla – Mr. Adnan Jahic – admits to it in this article he wrote for a pro-SDA Bosnian weekly newspaper on September 17, 1993 (re-published in 1996).
This devastating bombshell has been deliberately covered-up for over 15 years by the corportate controlled Western mass media, the US, NATO, EU Imperialist governments, and the pro-Imperialist, pro-Fascist so-called “Left” phonies such as Oliver Kamm, Marko Attila Hoare, WRP, SWP, ISM, et al.
This article has grave implications for Israeli Jews and for all decent working class people all over the world, since for over 15 years these people have promoted a self-confessed genocidal Islamofascist -Alija Izetbegovic – as a… ” Western oriented secular moderate muslim leader committed to a multi-ethnic liberal democracy”!!
The reason why this is so critically important to understand is that the same type of monstrous Western government, corporate mass media and phony “Left” Goebbels-style “Big Lie” technique has been perpetrated against Israel and the Israeli Jews with the Arab Islamofascists of Hamas in Gaza, Yasser Arafat (now Mahmoud Abbas’) PLO/Fatah party as well as Hezbollah in Lebanon being portrayed as… “helpless victims of Israeli state terror”
Virtuous Muslim State:
Vision of the future Bosnian state by Adnan Jahic, head of SDA [Izetbegovic’s party] for Tuzla region and a member of the newly elected Bosnian Parliament. This article originally appeared in Zmaj od Bosne, a pro-SDA paper, in 1993 and was reprinted during the election campaign [of 1996].
Front Slobode supported the opposition in the election campaign. 8/23/96
(Re-printed for fair use only)
Virtuous Muslim State
by Adnan Jahic
Front Slobode, Tuzla, Bosnia-Hercegovina, August 23, 1996
Quite often in contacts with my acquaintances and friends people ask whether I think that war will end soon. Since I am not a fortune-teller, nor I have extra-sensory powers, I always respond that I don’t know. At first glance, it might seem that this is an ordinary daily political question. Is that so? Let us ask ourselves why an average Tuzlak [inhabitant of Tuzla, city in north-eastern Bosnia] asks this question.
Maybe because of his concern and sympathy for our victimized and hungry brothers in Mostar, Maglaj, Srebrenica, Gorazde and Sarajevo, or because of his worry that he will go hungry tomorrow, or that the price of cigarettes will again jump to DM 15 per pack, or because of daily problems with water and electricity and supplies.
Of course the latter is behind his question. Hence, I never fail to add a short appendix to this two sentence verbal exchange: the essential question for a Tuzlak today is not when the war will end, but how will we, Bosnian Muslims, act in the political and moral sense after the war, when we are left alone in our own state. Besides, compared with the inhabitants of Sarajevo, Mostar, Srebrenica and Maglaj, Tuzlak doesn’t even have the right to ask when the war will end; we never had a war, in its classic destructive and murderous dimensions, in this region.
Therefore, if we are a nation and if we intend to demonstrate satisfactory degree of national solidarity and concern, let us come to our senses and recognize that it is extremely base and morbid, while our brothers and compatriots in mud and on the hills are defending our peace and well being, to think about ourselves, our material position, to whine and point our finger at the fictive problems of internal nationalism, fundamentalism, strengthening of “anti-alcoholic”, “anti-debauchery” and other anti tendencies, to lament about the alleged de-urbanization of the city etc., and all that as a substitute for our own passivity and national inactivity.
It is clear that in this war participation in history, the Truth and Justice belong only to those who fight for the survival and long term goals of the Muslim people; everything else, all supranational, quasi-liberal and pseudo- civilized ephemeral phenomena, from the Bloch’s point of view, are simply the surrogates of the history, uncaring quasi-creatures, unavoidable observers of the human reality and nothing else.
However, from the political point of view, the aforementioned “forces” have been significant since the beginning of the war against Bosnia and its bosnian muslim people only in their opposition to the total and consistent nationalization of Muslims and the establishment of the bosnian muslim state territory based on the true Islamic ethical and civilizational values.
Ever since the possibility that Muslims could after the war obtain their own nation state has begun to be mentioned in the public, the supporters of those forces have had only one ghoulish thought in their heads: that in that state someone could in the future force them into a mosque, forbid debauchery and lewdness, ban alcohol, lock up pornography etc.
In their consistent support of this stomach-libidinous philosophy all secular minds are loudly proclaiming that they do not want to live in dictatorship, together with “green-minded fascist regime” (as if they themselves were not servile poltroons and the objects deprived of any human dignity in the former “red-minded” regime), that they want freedom, Europe, prosperity etc., etc.
Putting aside the fact that their liberal-pro-Europe propaganda, even a small child understands that, is only a disguised substitute for their philosophy of unrestrained and unsatiable satisfaction of their urges and appetites, only a make up with which they hide their shame because they are Muslims, there is something much more important and dangerous for us, highly aware Bosnian Muslims. They are trying to convince us that there is a state without an ideology, which does not posses a list of state-national and social priorities and values.
I will try to express the essence of this article through the following points:
The territory controlled by the Bosnian Army after the war will be a Muslim state
This is a desire of the Muslim people and, after all, our leaders: secular leader Alija Izetbegovic and religious leader Mustafa Ceric (the latter one in a private conversation with me confirmed that the old dream of Alija Izetbegovic, member of the organization Young Muslims, has been and remains the establishment of the Muslim state in Bosnia-Hercegovina; finally, his dream is close to realization and “he is not terribly upset because of that”).
The Muslim state will be the national state of Bosniaks, or Muslims, while all other ethnic groups will have all civic rights which belong to ethnic minorities according to international conventions.
The Muslim state will have a Muslim ideology, based on Islam, Islamic religious, legal, ethical and social principles, but also on the contents of Western origin which do not contradict Islamic principles.
The Muslim ideology will be the basis for the complete state and legal system of the future Muslim state, from the state and national symbols, over the ruling national policy, to educational system, social and economic institutions, and of course, the Muslim family as the unit on which the whole state is based.
All citizens will be guaranteed equality before the law, while the level of personal prosperity, besides personal initiative, will especially depend on the degree to which the individual accepts and applies the principles and spirit of the Muslim ideology.
Every state since the ancient times has supported and promoted those individuals, structures and organizations which fully accepted and applied ideas and values which that state officially promoted as its own. No state has ever assisted its opposition, nor has it deliberately offered the possibility for the promotion of the opposing ideas and political interests.
Muslims in Bosnia-Hercegovina had a chance to observe that during both Yugoslavias. The future Muslim state must not be different in this respect. People who prove to be true Muslims, aware nationalists and good believers, will naturally have higher social privilege than those who persist in their opposition and promotion of leftist policy. Good Muslims and nationalists will be promoted to presidents and directors and be given preferential access to education (scholarships etc. ).
None of the principles of Muslim ideology will be imposed on anyone, as Koran prescribes, but the spirit of the ideology will be systematically promoted and infuse the society in all possible ways.
Prime time programs on radio, TV, movie theaters and cultural manifestations will have morally educational and nationally useful content; non-Muslim material will be on the margins of production and broadcasting.
Muslim ideology will aim to gradually abolish the duality between sacred and secular, religious and political, which has been imposed on us by the secularized Christian Europe against our will, via secular reforms of Kemal Pasha Ataturk, Lenin’s Bolshevik Russia and, finally, Socialist Federal Yugoslavia.
In its nature, Islam does not recognize the difference of religious and social. After all, Islam is not a “religion” but a religious-political ideology, an all encompassing approach to living. Islamic principles never remain on the surface of individual consciousness and individual religious experience. True Islam always aims to encompass the society in which it exists, and with it its political and state structures.
Formal result of the application of the Muslim ideology will be based on the lessons of Plato‘s political trilogy: “State”, “Statesmen”, and “Law”. “Law” will be especially taken into consideration as the book which promotes firm control of the society, law and order in a state, the book which affirms human virtues, religion and morality, and also advocates certain overseeing and political organizations in order to strengthen these values.
Political supremacy of the wisest men, if possible philosophers-politicians as advocated by Plato, will be ensured in the state; all advancement of morally degraded, uneducated and unprofessional people will be banned by law. Basic knowledge of philosophy, theology, civilisation and history will be required from all holders of high offices.
The state policy, during the first few decades, should take the middle of the road course, and strictly insist on the implementation and respect of all enacted laws, so that the state could as soon as possible get on its own feet and begin to respect Muslim ideology. Wider decentralisation and democratisation of the state could occur only after that.
P.S. The above listed observations are not only the opinion of this author. I have heard similar thoughts from a lot of individuals, and even some of men who are influential in the social and political life of Bosnia-Hercegovina. The presented version is only an attempt to finally face these complex, controversial, and for us Muslims vitally important issues and to put them in a preliminary, discussion ready frame.
Reprinted from Zmaj od Bosne [pro-SDA weekly paper published in Tuzla], issue number 51, September 17, 1993. The author is the president of SDA [Party of Democratic Action, ruling Bosnian-Muslim party] for Tuzla and the newly elected member of the Union of Bosnia-Hercegovina parliament.
Translated on 9/23/96
This is another great article from the 4international writing team. It is especially good because it points out that there is the strongest link possible between the situation facing the Jews of Israel and the situation facing the Serbs. This is a fact that the so-called “Lefts” in the anti-war movement cannot face up to. They are also seeking to lie about these issues just as much as is Vulliamy and Marshall etc. But we have it on record here on 4international that Izetbegovic was a fellow member of the Muslim Brotherhood back in the early 40s along with the Palestinian Arab Fascist, Nazi and notorious Jew Hater Hajj Amin el Husseini, who came to the Balkans, to join his fellow member of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Balkans, and then this Arab monster proceeded to carry out the murder of hundreds of thousands of Serbs, Jews, Romany and Homosexuals, aided of course by his fellow member of the Nazi Muslim Brotherhood, that is Izetbegovic.
That is who all on Harrys Place like DavidT, Kamm, Hoare of course, Maggie O’Kane and allthe rest of the British Media were supporting: a Nazi who clearly through his closest possible alliance with El Husseini in the Muslim Brotherhood was also part of the Holocaust of the Jews in the Balkans.
This is a quote fromt the anti-war movement and it is a good description of the role of Ashdown and Vulliamy in their support for this Nazi Islamist Izetbegovic. It goes on at the end of the quote to deal with the way the Islamofascists in Bosnia played on the victimhood theme which is a standard ploy of Islamists from Canada to Bosnia to Hamasland. But this writer from the anti-war movement deliberately does not make the link with the Palestinian Arab Fascists of Fatah and Hamas. The movement is split on the issue. You can see in this the way the Left became degenerated over the issue of the Palestinian Arabs of the PLO.
While Harrys Place, Kamm and Hoare tell lies about the role of Izetbegovic and the Islamofascist agenda in Bosnia against the Serbs and all other minorities, the fake “Left” supporters of Fascism hide the Nazi origins to Fatah and the PLO, as well as to Hamas.
start quote here
Such was the case with his eulogy for Alija Izetbegovic, the wartime leader of the Bosnian Muslims seen in the West as a moderate democrat and champion of tolerance, but celebrated in the Muslim world for his Islamic revolutionary work. At Izetbegovic’s funeral in October 2003, Ashdown said:
“He became the father of his people – the person who did more than any other to ensure the survival of the modern state of Bosnia and Herzegovina.”
Yes, so democratic, tolerant, and moderate was Ashdown’s friend Izetbegovic that he was buried at the “martyrs’ cemetery,” since Bosnian Muslim soldiers who died in the war were declared martyrs in the holy jihad. Ashdown made it plain that he supported Izetbegovic’s vision of Bosnia – but was it the vision conjured by his Western apologists, of a supposedly “citizen state” where ethnic and religious background were meaningless, or a Muslim state, incapable of coexisting with other forms of government, as Izetbegovic wrote in his 1970 pamphlet and 1990 book?
So used were they to Ashdown’s support, Izetbegovic’s heirs found it shocking when last month the viceroy quashed their plan to rename the Sarajevo international airport after the departed First Bosniak. Leaders of Izetbegovic’s SDA party howled in protest and denounced Ashdown, forgetting instantly his support for their agenda, or that his decision didn’t say “no,” so much as “not yet.” Ashdown thus found himself sharing the fate of every foreign official who came to Bosnia sympathetic to the Muslim cause, only to end up an object of invective as soon as he deviated even slightly from the SDA dogma of Muslim innocence and victimhood.
The attempts to impose a centralized government upon the feuding ethnic groups of Bosnia, which Ashdown escalated exponentially during his term, may seem successful on the surface. Even the “instinctively separatist” Serbs (to borrow a rare phrase from Vulliamy that is merely mildly derisive) have apparently agreed to accept “reform”; that was, however, before Washington announced its plan to establish a strong central government with only one president, abolishing the Dayton Constitution in letter as well as in spirit.
However, animosities among the communities have not diminished in the least; Muslim insistence on righteous victimhood – and the “retributive justice” they demand for it – along with centralization that strips Serbs and Croats of safeguards against Muslim political domination, have rubbed over half of Bosnia’s population the wrong way. Under the placid surface of Ashdownland, ancient hatreds are broiling and social engineering isn’t taking hold.
Another danger lurks in the shadows of denial. Throughout his term, Ashdown has rejected all reports of Islamic terrorist activity in Bosnia as malicious propaganda against the Muslims. Yet the evidence of a terrorist presence has been substantial. Just last week, two men were arrested on suspicion of planning suicide attacks on Western embassies, with searches turning up solid evidence against them. Soon afterward, Danish authorities arrested six people connected to the Bosnian suspects.
It is important to understand that, even though motivated at least in part by personal sentiment, “Paddy” Ashdown has not acted in Bosnia solely on his whims. Throughout his term, he has enjoyed the tacit support of the “Peace Implementation Council” – a group of old European empires, led by the USA, with Russia added as an afterthought. After last year’s Christmas purge, the U.S. ambassador in Bosnia publicly endorsed Ashdown’s actions. Whoever is appointed as Bosnia’s next – and rumors say, last – viceroy will not matter as much as the agenda for Bosnia that is firmly set in Empire’s mind.
It has been said on several occasions that without the “Office of the High Representative” Bosnia would have ceased to exist. Well, perhaps it should. There is not one single valid reason its people should continue to be lab rats in a social engineering experiment designed to garner credit with the Muslim world and assuage the pretense of Western conscience seduced by the politics of guilt.
end quote here
Nov 9 2005
A Viceroy Departs
by Nebojsa Malic
Pingback: KRAJINA…HOW THE LIE WAS TOLD « 4international
Video on Hajj Amin-Al Husseini and how he collaborated with the Nazis.
Greetings from Serbia!