by Felix Quigley
August 10, 2008
protestors against Georgian troops in south Osettia
Very predictably, the editor of Israpundit Ted Balman and his very strange friend there called Yamit82, have attacked me personally in order to distort the real position (http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=1777#comments) which we hold over the cowardly Georgian attack on South Ossetia, an attack which looks like the beginnings of war on Russia and China. Along with JoshR and Neil Craig of A Place to Stand () I also heard yesterday morning the same BBC reporter state clearly that Georgia had attacked first in an opportunist fashion when Putin was at the Olympics, and when the world was distracted by the opening of the Olympics.
This is not a time for throwing insults about. The disagreement which we have with Belman and Yamit82 is not personal but is rooted in how we see the role of US Imperialism in the world today.
People like Belman and Yamit82 do not distinguish between US Imperialism (the US ruling class or as some say “elites”) and the ordinary people of America. This is a fatal position to take. It means in the end aligning with the US Imperialists class (say Bush) and possibly perhaps inevitably by some strands against the Jews of Israel and their true compatriots the 60 million strong US Christian Evangelicals. The latter is not of course the position of Belman but without clarity on this issue it can lead there.
Is it possible that such a harmless sounding disagreement could lead to those drastic ends. I am afraid so. History is full of items like this, when disagreements may seem small but actually grow into great issues.
We have seen often on Israpundit Yamit82 attacking these Christian allies of the Jews. There have been many atacks on the American Evangelicals led by Hagee, even as Hagee was doing everything in his power to show he was a friend of Israel.
Now this position can quite easily grow into a support for US leaders against these Evangelical Christians. The basic political position of the Christian Evangelicals of America in supporting Israel as a vital part of their spiritual and political being is leading them along the road of combat with their own President, whether that President be Republican or Democrat, when that President lines up with Arab oil and with Islam against the existence of Israel.
Of course some may say “Poor little Georgia” etc, and I say “Poor them”. I pity them because they are just operating with emotion and are basically ignorant. It is necessary to study the real role of the Imperialists, especially British and US Imperialists, as they drive to war agains their competitors.
So it is vital to understand the role of the US Imperialists especially towards Asia, and why it sees India, China and Russia as its main enemies in this regard. This is also the only way to understand the continuous attacks on Yugoslavia from 1980 to the present which the US led, and also explains why the US has got no difficulty at all in being the ally of Islam when it suits them.
Some time ago Jared Israel of Emperors New Clothes was very much on the ball as regards US interests in Asia and I recall that he drew attention to some very important comments by an American lady which went almost unnoticed.
Her name was Elizabeth Jones and she was a high up official in the US State Department.
4international has pleasure in reproducing her words. They are an eye-opener and lead to a better understanding of what lies behind the actions of US satellite Georgia. Remember Georgia does not act alone. Can this be a repeat of a Srebrenica style haox!
[begin quote here]
14-12-01 Text: Assistant Secretary of State Jones on U.S.Policy in Central AsiaU.S. policy in Central Asia must include a commitment to “deeper, more sustained, and better-coordinated engagement on the full range of issues upon which we agree and disagree” — including security cooperation, energy and political and economic reform — Assistant Secretary of State Elizabeth Jones told the new Senate Subcommittee on Central Asia and the Caucasus December 13.Jones, who heads the State Department’s Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, provided an historical overview of Central Asia, described the U.S. “vision” for the region, and reported on Secretary of State Colin Powell’s recent visit there.
She said the United States is engaging with Central Asia “seriously and for the long term.” The fact that the Senate created a special subcommittee for Central Asian affairs “testifies to the importance that the United States now accords to this part of the world.”
Jones said the United States hopes to see a stable, peaceful and prosperous region where individual countries “markedly accelerate their economic reforms and democratic credentials, respect human rights, and develop vibrant civil societies.” This vision of Central Asia, she said, sees an increasing integration into the global economy “via an east-west corridor of cooperation stretching from China and Afghanistan across the Caucasus to the Mediterranean.” (my emphasis…FQ)
U.S. support will require resources tailored to each of the five countries in the region, Jones said: “Uzbekistan has asked for guidance and support in its dealings with the International Monetary Fund and other international financial organizations. Kazakhstan needs more foreign investment and support for local private-sector development. Turkmenistan may need support for the development of grass roots organizations. Kyrgyzstan needs help with its debt burden. Tajikistan, the poorest state in the region and still recovering from civil war and drought, will need a broad range of humanitarian, economic, and political assistance.”
“We are ready to explore new areas of assistance for all five states, but only in exchange for demonstrated, concrete steps toward reform,” Jones told the subcommittee.
Jones called Secretary Powell’s recent trip to Central Asia a “rousing success,” although inclement weather prevented him from stopping in the Kyrgyz Republic — he was only able to speak with Kyrgyz President Askar Akayev by telephone.
She said the primary purpose of the trip was to express U.S. appreciation for the support provided by the Central Asian countries in the international anti-terrorism campaign. Powell also explored the “full range of cooperation” including the development of genuine pluralism and democracy, rule of law, humanitarian relief, Caspian energy, human rights, and economic reform.
“The stakes are undeniably high in Central Asia,” Jones said. “In what only a decade ago was the Soviet Union, the United States now has thousands of U.S. military personnel working alongside their Central Asian counterparts. We rely on these governments for the security and well-being of our troops, and for vital intelligence that has helped us to conduct such an effective military campaign in Afghanistan.” (my emphasis…FQ)
She described a range of U.S.-supported programs designed to promote human rights, democracy, and economic development in Central Asia, and said these programs “are every bit as important as our security assistance in dealing with the long-term root causes of terrorism.”
Following is the text of Jones’ statement to the Senate subcommittee, as prepared for delivery:
U.S.-CENTRAL ASIAN COOPERATION
A. Elizabeth Jones, Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs
Subcommittee on Central Asia and the Caucasus
Foreign Relations Committee
December 13, 2001
Mr. Chairman, distinguished members of the Subcommittee, it is a distinct honor and privilege to be the first Administration official to testify before this new Subcommittee of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. The very fact that it was created testifies to the importance that the United States now accords to this part of the world. I want to report to you about Secretary Powell’s visit to Central Asia over this past weekend, and discuss with you the general issues of our rapidly evolving cooperation with the five frontline states. (my emphasis…FQ) But first, I would like to give you a bit of context for what makes this important part of the world unique.
The five countries of Central Asia emerged only a decade ago from the debris of the Soviet Union. While their ambitions are Western they have far more in common with their Asian neighbors than with traditional Europe. To the West, Central Asia for centuries has been one of the most inaccessible and least understood parts of the world. In the Middle Ages, great Islamic theologians, philosophers, scientists, and artists were born, flourished, and were buried in Central Asia, mostly in modern-day Uzbekistan. Their scholarship deeply influenced the Renaissance in Europe. (my emphasis…FQ)
By the late 19th century, however, these squabbling and despotic warlords became vulnerable to colonization by the Russian Empire. At the turn of the 20th century, the Soviet Empire clamped this region in the vise (sic) of Stalinism. I do not excuse the current problems and irritants in Central Asia. But when we become impatient, we need to remember the Region’s 20th-century history. Major transitions in the basic nature of these regimes may require generational change. We need to be patient and continue to push for reform where it is possible.
We have a vision for this region – that it become stable, peaceful, and prosperous. We have a vision that the individual countries will markedly accelerate their economic reforms and democratic credentials, respect human rights, and develop vibrant civil societies. We have a vision that the countries of this region are increasingly integrated into the global economy via an east-west corridor of cooperation stretching from China and Afghanistan across the Caucasus to the Mediterranean. (my emphasis…FQ) We share this vision with the well-educated, ambitious, hard-working people of these new countries. We are engaging — seriously and for the long term — with Central Asia.
The Secretary’s Visit
Our readiness to engage more intensively was the message that Secretary Powell carried to the region last weekend. Of course, a primary purpose of his visit was to express American appreciation for the Central Asian countries’ ongoing critical support for Operation Enduring Freedom. While concentrating on the war effort, however, he explored the full range of cooperation, including the development of genuine pluralism and democracy, rule of law, humanitarian relief, Caspian energy, human rights and economic reform.
The Secretary began in Uzbekistan, the most populous Central Asian state. In his meetings with President Karimov, Foreign Minister Kamilov and Defense Minister Gulamov, the Secretary discussed Uzbekistan’s role in the war on terrorism, the political future of Afghanistan, and the continued importance of human rights and economic reform. During the Secretary’s visit, President Karimov took the important step of announcing the opening of the Friendship Bridge between Uzbekistan and Afghanistan that we expect will soon serve as a critical corridor for humanitarian relief supplies. The Secretary also took the time to meet with an Uzbek NGO emphasizing the importance he places on the development of civil society. I will follow up on the Secretary’s visit with a trip to Tashkent early next year to co-chair the U.S.-Uzbekistan Joint Security Cooperation Consultations. These discussions are intended to define in greater detail the contours of our new and intensified relationship.
The Secretary’s second stop was to be the Kyrgyz Republic, but nature intervened. Heavy snowfall in Bishkek prevented the Secretary’s plane from landing. He did have a long telephone call with President Akayev in which they discussed further counterterrorism cooperation and progress on Kyrgyz efforts to promote further democratic reform. Facing daunting obstacles, the Kyrgyz leadership early on embraced democratic and economic reforms. After backsliding, the country is returning to the road to reform.
The Secretary’s final stop in Central Asia was Kazakhstan, the state with the largest territory and the most economic potential in the region. Stable, multi-ethnic, and nuclear-free, Kazakhstan is likely to become one of the top five oil producers in the world by 2010. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development judged it the leading economic reformer of the former Soviet Union. U.S. investment exceeds $5 billion [$5,000 million], and is growing.
The Secretary’s talks with President Nazarbayev and Foreign Minister Idrisov focused on the need for further competition and transparency in energy development, deeper development of democracy and respect for human rights, and Kazakhstan’s potential role in Afghan reconstruction. The Secretary also discussed with President Nazarbayev his visit to Washington later this month.
While in Astana, he met with members of the American Chamber of Commerce to reinforce the message that we are working with Central Asian governments to make sure that the region is a profitable place for U.S. business and investment. (my emphasis…FQ)
Our New Vision for Central Asia
Secretary Powell’s visit to the region was a rousing success. He received a gratifying level of support and cooperation from our Central Asian partners. This is yet another sign of how the world has changed after September 11. And it underlines that our foreign policy must evolve to keep pace with this change. The stakes are undeniably high in Central Asia. In what only a decade ago was the Soviet Union, the United States now has thousands of U.S. military personnel working alongside their Central Asian counterparts. We rely on these governments for the security and well-being of our troops, and for vital intelligence that has helped us to conduct such an effective military campaign in Afghanistan. (my emphasis…FQ)
The frontline states of the region provide a critical humanitarian corridor for food and emergency supplies that may save the lives of millions of people living in northern Afghanistan this winter. We will want the rising tide of reconstruction in Afghanistan to lift the Central Asian boats, too. We would like to see post-war reconstruction supplies and materials purchased, to the extent possible, in neighboring countries to buoy their economies.
Our country is now linked with this region in ways we could never have imagined before September 11. Our policy in Central Asia must include a commitment to deeper, more sustained, and better-coordinated engagement on the full range of issues upon which we agree and disagree. These include security cooperation, energy, and internal strengthening of these countries through political and economic reform. President Bush has invited both the presidents of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan to Washington in the coming months as the centerpiece of this intensified engagement.
We have told the leaders of these countries that America will not forget in the future those who stand by us now. After this conflict is over, we will not abandon Central Asia. We are committed to providing the resources, the high-level attention, and the multinational coordination to support reform opportunities. We want to stand by the Central Asian countries in their struggle to reform their societies in the same way they have stood by us in the war on terrorism. This is not only a new relationship, but a long-term relationship.
This will require resources that must be tailored to each country. Uzbekistan has asked for guidance and support in its dealings with the International Monetary Fund and other international financial organizations. Kazakhstan needs more foreign investment and support for local private-sector development. Turkmenistan may need support for the development of grass roots organizations. Kyrgyzstan needs help with its debt burden. Tajikistan, the poorest state in the region and still recovering from civil war and drought, will need a broad range of humanitarian, economic, and political assistance. In all five countries, we need to expand our ongoing support for democratic political institutions, local non-governmental organizations, and independent media. We are ready to explore new areas of assistance for all five states, but only in exchange for demonstrated, concrete steps toward reform.
Promoting reform in Central Asia has not been easy. Today we are concentrating much of our assistance on programs that seek to educate and inspire the next generation of leaders in the region. You know these initiatives well. They include the high school-level FLEX program, Freedom Support Act program at the university level, and the graduate-level Muskie program. Further, the IREX exchange program targets young professionals, and the Peace Corps has a broad range of programs for the next generation. These programs look to the future by concentrating on the successor generations, and they are an integral part of our long-term commitment to Central Asia.
Promoting Longer-Term U.S. Interests
In addition to wanting these countries to become stable and prosperous, we have three significant U.S. national interests in the region: preventing the spread of terrorism, providing tools for political and economic reform and institution of the rule of law, and ensuring the security and transparent development of Caspian energy reserves.
The terrorist threat emanating from Afghanistan reinforces our view that underdevelopment and repressive, anti-democratic regimes provide conditions that terrorists and other extremists exploit. We have been working on counterterrorism with states in the region, but we must do more in parallel with our emphasis on respect for human rights. Since the announcement of the Central Asian Border Security Initiative in April 2000, the USG has committed $70 million for customs and border-guard training, anti-terrorism assistance, and communication, observation and detection equipment. These programs have been well-received. They have developed the basis for cooperation upon which we have built our current joint efforts in Operation Enduring Freedom. But I want to emphasize that our many efforts at promoting human rights, democracy and economic development are every bit as important as our security assistance in dealing with the long-term root causes of terrorism.
An inextricable component of a more secure and prosperous Central Asia is an investment and legal climate that will both fuel local economic development and protect the interests of U.S. traders and investors. Property rights, privatization, due process, rule of law, currency convertibility, bank and tax reform all contribute to the security of investments and individuals in Central Asia — the foundation of a stable economy and just society. We are investing heavily in efforts to promote this kind of reform throughout the region.
Development of the vast Caspian energy reserves and their reliable export to global markets will in large part determine the ability of Central Asia to achieve economic independence and improve the standard of living of its citizens. Ensuring this autonomy for the Caspian states, as well as diversifying global energy supplies and creating opportunities for U.S. expertise and investment, make the development of Caspian energy an important U.S. interest as well. Our policy in this area has focused on enabling these states to develop multiple and reliable transport corridors for delivery of these resources to global markets. (my emphasis…FQ)
Currently these hydrocarbon resources reach the West via pipelines that transit Russia. We seek to broaden export options for the countries of Central Asia and the companies operating there. Our objective is therefore anti-monopoly but not anti-Russian. We have supported and facilitated the efforts of Turkey, Azerbaijan and Georgia to reach agreement with private companies to build pipelines from the Caspian Sea across the Caucasus to Turkey. I am proud to say that construction of the landmark Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline will begin this summer and will bring oil to world markets in 2005. The Shah Deniz gas pipeline, paralleling BTC, is also on track. I am also pleased that the Caspian Pipeline Consortium, or CPC Pipeline, is also now officially operating. This pipeline, which links Kazakhstan to global markets via Russia, underscores the desire to work in partnership with the former Soviet nations, developing Caspian energy
A New Partnership with RussiaOne of the most remarkable developments of the last three months has been our extraordinary cooperation with Russia in a region that was formerly part of the Soviet Union and that Russia naturally regards as its own backyard.
On October 19, we conducted our first-ever United States-Russia consultations on Central Asia. We were both pleasantly surprised and gratified by the convergence of interests in this region. We both desire long-term stability and prosperity in Central Asia, where we both have important interests. And we have pledged transparency and collaboration. Secretary Powell’s conversations in Central Asia and Moscow over the past few days were part of this new effort, and demonstrate [that] there need be no tension between our support for the sovereignty and independence of the Central Asian states and our desire for broader and deeper cooperation with Russia.
Presidents Bush and Putin are leading our countries to a new level of cooperation in many spheres, including in Central Asia. President Putin has shown noteworthy leadership in the way he has actively coordinated with Central Asian leaders to encourage their cooperation with the United States in the battle against terrorism. This supports what we have long said: that Central Asia is not a zero-sum game. We have no desire to replay the nineteenth century “Great Game” in the twenty-first. We have offered support to efforts by Russia, Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan to foster a new Caspian Sea delimitation scheme, as long as these efforts do not hinder the future transport of energy resources. Our shared interests with Russia — indeed, with the other regional powers of China, Turkey and even Iran — are greater than our areas of competition. (my emphasis…FQ)
The role of the Congress, and in particular this Subcommittee of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, will be vital as we invigorate our relations with Central Asia. As the former United States Ambassador to Kazakhstan, I have seen first-hand that the leaders in this region really do want an active dialogue with the United States and especially with members of Congress. I would certainly welcome more members of Congress visiting Central Asia, but particularly members of this Subcommittee. The Administration values your input and suggestions as we move forward with this region. It is for that reason that I am particularly grateful for your invitation to share perspectives today.
(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)
So ends the report by this commisar from he State Department of the US. It is clear, is it not, that oil is just one very small item in their total agenda which is how to have US rule and sway be effected in this most populous part of the world.
One would think that the US would have enough to do in solving all the population and resource problems in its own neck of the woods, in the good old US of A. But no here we see it sticking its nose right into the affairs of Asia and rubbing right up against the intersts of Russia.
Remember the Kennedy reaction to the Russians sending some rockets to sit on Cuban soil. It was straight to nuclear wipe-out by Kennedy and the world held its breath.
But that is a good as any definition of Imperialism and the US is the Imperialist nation par excellence!
This was carried on the url
and was referred to from an article