By Felix Quigley
February 26, 2009-02-26
The central question in the world today is “What is the US elite up to in promoting and stirring up Jew Hatred on a world basis?”
Another question to ask is will the Democratic Stimulus programme, where Obama pumps trillions into the system, actually work or just do any good at all.
The answer to the latter question is NO!
It will not work in the slightest. The crisis in capitalism is an historical crisis to do with the inability of the working class to take power from off the capitalist class, based on the anarchy of capitalist non planning, and replace their system wioth one based on human reason.
So if the “Stimulus” will not work, and going on the basic assumption that the American elite are not at all stupid but in fact arer highly intelligent, then what is their other strategy.
We on 4international believe that the strategy of the US elite, followed by the British, the German and even little pygmy capitalists like the Irish and their now deceased “Celtic Tiger” is to create a different form of rule.
And the method as always is…stir up antisemitism.
The US elite if their real intention is to stir up antisemitism on a world scale have a huge and very convenient weapon on their hands. That is the forces of reactionary Islam. Jew Hatred is hard wired into the Islam religion and political philosophy and has taken over arguably from Christianity in that strategic for the ruling elites role of Jew Hatred.
We on 4international believe that the US Government has been stirring up Jew Hatred through its alliance with Islam, this is why the US elite formed a close bond with Islamist murderers in Bosnia against the Christian Serbs, and is especially true of the Bush promotion of the Palestine State which must be a direct threat to Jews in Israel. Even the blindest person can now see that the agitation for a Palestine State has assumed the status of a religion in the world, but it is a religion which has as its centre the oldest hatred of all, antisemitism
Now the US, British and Europeans are leading in bringing Hamas forward, away from its previous characterisation as a terrorist force, and into the folds of “respectability” in a unity with Fatah. It must be emphasised that Fatah is one of the bitterest Jew Hating movements on the planet and its ancestry dates back to the Holocaust of the Jews in Europe and to the planned nazi cum Arab Holocaust of every Jew in Palestine and the middle East in the precise year of 1942
As part of this over the next 6 weeks the US elite are promoting Jew Hatred in the Durban 2 conference held in South Africa.
Nothing shows better the role of the US as the main promotor of Jew Hatred in the world than the on going preparations for this conference, in which the US is taking part.
The role of the US in these negotiations around the format of this conference is duplicitous. This is for a particular reason. There are very many ordinary Americans, in the non Jewish American community, who hate antisemitism, love the Jews as a people, love Israel as a plucky defender of Jews against nazism, who would be very angry indeed if they knew that their own rulers was carrying on in this way against the Jews.
That’s why the US elite always talks with a forked tongue on the issue of the Jews. They always try to make it appear that they are the friend of the Jews. At the same time the content of the policy of the US rulers is always opposed to the Jews.In other words the US ruling elite is Jew hating in a way which is borrowed from the Nazis, many of whom were recruited into US intelligence post 1945, as the study in the book “Blowback” by Christopher Simpson proved.
Luckily we have on the internet a wonderfully astute writer who is following every move that is being made by the US Government in the talsk around this UN Conference in Durban. Her name is Ann Bayevsky. This planned conference due in April is promoted as being an “anti racism” conference. But that is subterfuge. The conference has already got a history. It had a predecessor. Durbam 1 turned out to be only an excuse to attack Israel and the reason for this is that the UN is controlled by the 52 strong Islamic Organization which sits at the centre of the UN, of UN decisions and of UN resolutions.
Yet it carries the prestige of the UN. OK many of us who have followed things know that the UN is full of Israel hatred, which is really Jew hatred, but it still carries prestige in billions who do not know, and the antisemites in the world know that very well and accordingly do use it
This is why this conference in Durban is so serious. It is being used to promote antisemitism. The big question really is the role of the US Government. Anne Bayefsky is really the expert in the world on this issue.
Anne Bayefsky is a senior fellow of the Hudson Institute, director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust and editor of www.EYEontheUN.org.
Remember what we said about the US elite having to present themselves as the friends of Israel. Anne gets torn into this concept from the very beginning of this article
The Obama administration’s decision to join the planning of the U.N.’s Durban II “anti-racism” conference has just taken a new twist: cover-up. On Friday, State Department officials and a member of the American Durban II delegation claimed the United States had worked actively to oppose efforts to brand Israel as racist in the committee drafting a Durban II declaration. The trouble is that they didn’t.
The Feb. 20 State Department press release says the U.S. delegation in Geneva “outline[d] our concerns with the current outcome document” and in particular “our strong reservations about the direction of the conference, as the draft document singles out Israel for criticism.”
One member of the delegation told The Washington Post: “The administration is pushing back against efforts to brand Israel as racist in this conference.”
Why say that? Is it true?
And if efforts are being made to stir up antisemitism why be there? Is that not lending credibility?
But essentially is the above claim by this US delegate true?
Next Anne deals with the Washington Post. This next article looks like a plant. I mean who exactly is “Colum Lynch”? Who works for the Washington Post?
Note below that Anne using the word “fawning” to describe Lynch.
Washington Post columnist Colum Lynch championed the U.S. bravado in an article based on the story orchestrated by the American delegates. In his Feb. 20 article entitled: “U.S. Holds Firm on Reparations, Israel in U.N. Racism Talks,” he fawned: “The Obama administration on Thursday concluded its first round of politically charged U.N. negotiations on racism, pressing foreign governments … to desist from singling out Israel for criticism in a draft declaration to be presented at a U.N. conference in April.”
And to answer Lynch Anne makes this firm challenge to the US Government no less than to Lynch.
But Ann shows that fitting in to a conference that is promoting Israel, that is Jew, hatred, means silence to attacks on Israel.
Instead, Obama’s Durban II team slipped easily into the U.N.’s anti-Israel and anti-Jewish environs, taking the approach that “fitting in” was best accomplished by staying silent.
On Tuesday, the Palestinian delegation proposed inserting a new paragraph under the heading “Identification of further concrete measures and initiatives … for combating and eliminating all manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance…” with the subtitle “General provisions on victims … of discrimination.”
The paragraph includes: “Calls for … the international protection of the Palestinian people throughout the occupied Palestinian territory.” In other words, it claims that the Palestinian people are victims of Israeli racism and demands that all U.N. states provide protection from the affronts of the racist Jewish state.
Pay attention to the above paragraph. That is the promotion of Jew hatred in the world today.
Israel IS the Homeland of the Jewish people. Jews look to Israel as the defence against antisemitism. In Israel is contained all of the values of the Jewish people. And the above is stirring up hatred of the Jews. Why are the US Government doing this to the Jews.
Anne continues with her minute examination of these texts although I must say there is no need to read further than the above paragraph.
Furthermore, the new Palestinian provision “Calls for … implementation of international legal obligations, including the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the wall…” This is a dramatic attempt to change an “advisory opinion” into a “legal obligation”–a status which attaches to no advisory opinion.
I must say that this sleight of hand is so typical of these antisemites, changing something which is advisory into legal obligation. Then repeating the legal obligation bit until it sticks. I suppose you could call this lying by repetition.
Anne continues by explaining with detail how that decision was taken, particularly telling is that the Egyptian Judge stated his verdict before the hearing, maybe a new in jurisprudence, but the simple point made by Buergenthal that the court separated the wall from the suicide bombing that made the wall kind of necessary, no!
The ICJ decision, which advises that the Israeli security fence is illegal, has always been rejected by the United States–hitherto. And with good reason. The Egyptian judge had voiced his opinion on the result before the case was even heard, in his capacity as a leading Egyptian diplomat. The terms of reference from the General Assembly who asked for the decision, and the documents they laid before the Court, predetermined the outcome. And as the strong dissent by the American judge and Holocaust survivor Tom Buergenthal pointed out, the Court came to its preposterous conclusion that “the right of legitimate or inherent self-defense is not applicable in the present case” without considering “the deadly terrorist attacks to which Israel is being subjected.”
Now in her study of these strange goings on re Durban 2 comes to the central issue.
Anne asks the simple and vital question, What did the US Government, Obama’s team do when confronted with this concentrated Israel hatred. The answer is the following
Nothing, absolutely nothing.
And if that is not bad enough it seems that the US Government also in the most duplicitous manner ensured that Holocaust Denial would be on the agenda of Durban. This now requires careful reading because the US Government delegation is very, very duplicitous.
The Obama team was not only silent on the new “Israel is racist” language, it also said nothing when faced with Holocaust denial. Negotiators from the European Union suggested on Wednesday a new provision to “condemn without reservation any denial of the Holocaust and urges all states to reject denial of the Holocaust as an historical event, either in full, or in part, or any activities to this end.” Iran–whose president is a Holocaust-denier–immediately objected and insisted that the proposal be “bracketed” or put in dispute. The move blocked the adoption of the proposal and ensured another battle over the reality of the Holocaust in April–at these supposedly “anti-racism” meetings. After Iran objected, the chair looked around the room, expecting a response. He said: “Is there any delegation wishing to comment on this new proposal by the European Union? It doesn’t seem the case. We move on.” U.S. delegates said nothing, even after the prompt.
Again, the American silence must have been deliberate. In marked contrast, after the E.U. objected to a provision calling for limits on free speech, the American delegation had no trouble piping up immediately: “I want to echo the comments from the E.U. This … call for restrictions is something that my government is not able to accept.”
That the US Government is promoting Jew hatred in the world is now for sure. Reading the above the staunchest American supporter could not dispute this. The big question is why? I feel that Jared and Fran plus some others touched on the why? But only we on 4international are getting to the central deal here.
Ann sums up her position:
The delay tactics are indefensible. The U.S. administration attended four full days of negotiation. During that time they witnessed the following: the failure to adopt a proposal to act against Holocaust denial, a new proposal to single out Israel, which will now be included in the draft without brackets, broad objections to anything having to do with sexual orientation, vigorous refusal by many states to back down on references to “Islamophobia” (the general allegation of a racist Western plot to discriminate against all Muslims), and numerous attacks on free speech.
This “dialogue” is not promoting rights and freedoms. It is legitimizing a forum for disputing the essence of democracy, handing Holocaust deniers a global platform and manufacturing the means to demonize Israel in the interests of those states bent on the Jewish state’s destruction.
Anne Byefsky concludes with this serious warning as to where the US Government is heading. I do not think that the conclusion of Anne is half strong enough. These are not enemies of freedom so much as antisemites, who are fascists, who hate Jews and who prepare a new Holocaust of the Jews. The US is either lending credibility to this or it is actually leading and promoting this. I prefer the latter because the US is the Master, and is in a Master relationship to the Islamofascists. But we are extremely thankful to Anne for putting in the hard work to track these momentous events, incidentally proving in her own way the extremely progressive nature of the Jewish cause in thepast, present and the future.
If the Obama administration does not immediately announce that its foray into the morass of Durban II has led it to decide this is no place for genuine believers in human rights and freedoms, there is only one conclusion possible. His foreign policy of engagement amounts to a new willingness to sacrifice Israel and an indeterminate number of American values for the sake of a warm welcome from the enemies of freedom.