I appeal to all who read this blog and especially if you have written for us before or had any contact with us and fallen as it were by the wayside.

Please get in contact. Safest way is use the comment section below and preface “Private” at the top then we will not publish

From the previous 2 articles it is clear that there is some urgency in the situation.

Write and tell us what you are working on in a political sense, where you are living , your own experiences in these dificult times




by Felix Quigley

March 30, 2009

It is not just Obama that is the problem for Israel although he is indeed a deadly problem. There is every chance that Obama has been recruited by the CIA from an early stage and that this Nazi created organization has groomed Obama for this present stage in the unprecedented economic crisis of US Imperialism.

People in general do not give enough attention to the ability of the ruling capitalist or imperialist class (some use the word “elite”) to think ahead and to plan, planning which is sometimes measured in decades.

This was brought home to Irish nationalists when it became apparent that the very top leaders in Sinn Fein, I mean the ones who are sitting today at the very top of the Stormont Good Friday Government along with the right neanderthals of Paisley, were paid money as young people and kept on the rolls of British Intelligence.

You seldom have firm proof of these things. But you can work it out by people´s actions. It just seems odd that Obama comes along at this point to promote the deadly Islam.

This is an attempt by Ted Belman the editor of Israpundit to come to terms with these deadly for Israel developments.

[Begin analysis by Ted Belman here]

NYT: Give the Palestinians what they want or else.

By Ted Belman

As the Netanyahu government nears completion, everyone is piling on the pressure to succumb to Palestinian demands. The EU made it clear again, if Israel rejects the two-state solution, it wont be business as usual between Israel and the EU.

Yesterday the NY Times, the publisher of the antisemitc Oliphant cartoon, editorialized,

    It will not be that hard to judge by his deeds, and relatively soon, whether Mr. Netanyahu is serious about seeking peace with the Palestinians. His government is expected to win parliamentary approval next week.

    After that, we suggest that he start with freezing further settlement construction and expansion in the West Bank, as Israel has so often promised but failed to do. He should lift roadblocks between Palestinian cities and towns that are not needed for security. In East Jerusalem, he should stop the humiliating eviction of Palestinians. And in Gaza, he must expand exceptions to the blockade to allow the import of cement and reconstruction materials.  

    If Mr. Netanyahu is serious about being a partner for peace, he will not get in the way of the militant group Hamas entering a Palestinian unity government with the rival Fatah faction — as long as that government is committed to preventing terrorism and accepts past agreements between Israel and the Palestinians. He will recognize that the United States has its own interests in diplomacy with Syria, Iran and the Palestinians — and allow the Obama administration the freedom to pursue them. He also will not start a preventive war with Iran. [..]

    As The Times’s Ethan Bronner reported, Israel is increasingly isolated and facing its worst diplomatic crisis in two decades following its Gaza war. Mr. Netanyahu has understandably raised alarms with the expectation that his foreign minister will be an ultranationalist leader with what are widely considered to be anti-Arab views. Failing to pursue peace talks with the Palestinians would only make things worse by causing frictions with the new Obama administration and with Europe.

Essentially what the Times and the EU are saying is, don’t bother me with the niceties, just give the Palestinians what they want. Gone is the pretext that the US or the EU won’t compromise Israel’s security. Gone is the commitment of the Quartet to allow the parties to negotiate the terms of the agreement.

In its place is the demand, nay the threat, give the Palestinians what they want or else. No demands are made on the Palestinians.

The Times suggests that Israel is controlling America, preventing it from pursuing its interests. Its that damned lobby again. More ominous is the idea that the US, if constraints were removed in Congress, could cut a deal with Syria and Iran. Or are they also suggesting that if Israel doesn’t provide the US with bargaining chips, such as the Golan, then Israel is preventing the US from pursuing its interests.

The NYT lowers the bar for acceptance of Hamas to the level that they accept former agreements. Hamas prefers to only “respect” them. No where is there a demand that they honour them. Netanyahu has committed to abide by all Israel’s signed agreements, which by the way do not include the Roadmap which is a blueprint and not an agreement. The NYT wants more from Israel than that it honour all agreements. It wants her to make new agreements. It certainly doesn’t expect the Palestinians to honour their agreements.

This attack by the EU and the NYT culminates a long standing plan of the State Department and others to impose peace. It started with the insertion of the Saudi Plan into the Roadmap. It continued with the publication of The Israel Lobby and the prosecution of Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman of AIPAC. Four years ago, I wrote “Viable State” trumps “secure borders” in which I took the position that the Saudi Plan was the State Department Plan. A few months after this article I commented

    “Friends of Israel should recognize reality here. Israel is merely going through the motions of negotiating and agreeing or disagreeing while the reality is that the outcome has been predetermined and forced on Israel.”.

The selection of Gen Jones and Samantha Power to serve in the Obama administration is further evidence of the long standing plan to force the Saudi Plan on Israel. It is no accident that during the period when Netanyahu was forming his government the attacks reached a crescendo to affect the makeup of the ultimate coalition. Just a day before the above noted editorial appeared, the NYT published a Op-Ed by Roger Cohen in the New York Times (The Fierce Urgency of Peace), advising on the right way to deal with Israel, based on a “Bipartisan Statement on U.S. Middle East Peacemaking.”. This report enshrined the thinking of Power and Jones as to the terms of the settlement and how to get there.

In Obama’s recent press conference he said “.. the status quo is unsustainable. That it is critical for us to advance a two-state solution”.

Yet it is critical that Israel not advance the two state solution especially on Palestinian terms.

The pressure applied to Netanyahu will be unbearable.

It became clear to us on 4international that the event of the Gaza War brought all of the antisemites of Western Europe, the US and even Canada, out into the open. Calling themselves the “left” (but not really left at all, be advised) they marched along with Arabs and Islamists behind banners and slogans which were evidently and obviously antisemitic.

This is the new Nazism. It is the new antisemitism. It takes many forms indeed.

In my own experience here are a few.

Journalists who are attacking Israel over the Gaza war but who are totally quiet about the 8000 rockets which were hitting Israel for 8 years.

People who are quiet over the fact that Hamas is a Holocaust denying organization.

These are the new Nazis no matter how polite they may sound, and even though some may speak in clipped upper class English accents.

On the San Francisco march strode a woman and her two pretty children behind a banner which it appeared they wrote themselves. “Jews are Murderers” they proclaimed to the world. And it looked as if they thought this was normal.

On the Toronto march a number of Jews who gathered in a counter-demonstration were told by the Toronto police they could not be protected by the police and it was safer for these Jews to go home, and presumably stay at home!

This is of course antisemitism of a very developed nature.

So we are grateful to Ted Belman for introducing the subject. This must indeed be the basis for much discussion on the way forward for Israel.


by Felix Quigley

March 30, 2009


The Holocaust of all the Jews in Israel and with it a sizeable number of innocent Arabs is now being prepared, in fact the finishing touches are being added to, by the forces of Islam and of US Imperialism.

This is the only conclusion that can be drawn from the following report which we reproduce from DEBKAfile

[start report from DEBKAfile here]

Designated prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu simply pushes away any suggestion of pressure on Israel from the Obama administration in Washington, while Ehud Olmert has said a few days before bowing out that he has left the Iranian nuclear threat to the next government.

Olmert forgot to mention that his government’s policy of letting Israel be sidelined on the existential Iranian issue and knuckling under to the US lead and its failed sanctions policy allowed Iran to build up momentum in its race for a nuclear bomb.

Olmert “forgot” to mention that Israel is no longer in a position to stop Iran’s nuclear program.

He and foreign minister Tzipi Livni bow out therefore leaving Israel vulnerable as never before to international pressure in all its external policies. Before he takes office, the incoming prime minister is already having his arm twisted by Washington and the European Union on Palestinian statehood – and that is just the beginning because of another development which Olmert “forgot” to mention.

DEBKAfile’s Washington sources report that the Obama administration is on the threshold of a major rapprochement with Tehran, a reversal of US policy dramatic enough to block out international sanctions. Iran will be allowed to keep its nuclear program, including military elements and enriched uranium stocks, up to the point of actually assembling a weapon.

Washington will continue the Bush practice of publishing “reports” that Iran is still years away from a weaponizing capability. Tehran will hold the upper hand by retaining the option to go forward and build a bomb within one month of a decision to do so and mount warheads on ballistic missiles already standing ready, as revealed last Sunday, March 25, by Israel’s military intelligence chief Maj. Gen. Amos Yadlin.

Because of the Olmert-Livni policy position in the last two years, Israel no longer has any say in Washington and international forums on the nuclear-arming of Iran.

The outgoing prime minister mentioned that Israel has a long-range operational arm able to strike anywhere. But he forgot that, on his watch, Israel lost the ability to employ it. DEBKA file’s Washington sources report that the Obama administration, like its predecessor, will throw everything they have against an Israeli prime minister who ventures to employ its long-range arm. This will not be news to Netanyahu, any more than Olmert.

Just as Ariel Sharon dumped the Iranian problem in Olmert’s lap, he too is handing it down to his successor. He not only avoided solving it but left Israel with less leverage than ever before for heading off the fast-approaching peril.

Netanyahu is whistling in the dark when he pretends to see no American squeeze on the horizon of his government-in-waiting. One of the hardest long-term tasks ahead of him will be to rebuild Israel’s position as America’s needed and respected strategic ally, in the face of Barack Obama’s ardent courtship of Iran and the Muslim world.

The US president is willing to ditch Israel as a friend. This will be brought home to Jerusalem when he makes his big speech on April 7 appealing for a grand US-Muslim global reconciliation. The US president is preparing to tie a Palestinian-Israeli settlement – on Washington’s terms – to such unrelated issues as Afghanistan and Pakistan as the currency for purchasing Muslim and Arab backing for accommodations of these outstanding terrorist fronts.

Different forms of coercion, including the discrediting of the Netanyahu government if it fails to toe the Obama line, will follow. The incoming prime minister’s pretense that “all is well” between him and the US administration is pie in the sky, instead of the resolute, firm hand which Israel needs at the helm these days to recoup command over its basic policies and the international community’s faded respect.

When Debka writes above

One of the hardest long-term tasks ahead of him will be to rebuild Israel’s position as America’s needed and respected strategic ally”

then they are mistaken. Israel was never in that relationship with the US Government. From the very beginning the US State Department opposed the creation of Israel as an independent country. The US Government and the British, now EU, Governments have always been in alliance with Islam.

For the role of the US Government see

from Professor Gil White´s analysis

1945 – Negative – After 1945, the US created US Intelligence by recruiting tens of thousands of Nazi war criminals.

1947-48 – Mixed to Negative – Forced by external circumstances, the US government gave lukewarm support to the creation of the State of Israel. But then it reversed itself and implemented policies designed to destroy Israel.

1949-1953 – Negative – In Israel’s hour of supreme need, the US allied with Israel’s mortal enemies.

The best example of this is perhaps the experience of Yugoslavia, when all of these Governments in US and EU were without exception on the side of the Islamofascist Izetbegovic in Bosnia.

Serious and perhaps dark times ahead for Israel.


by Felix Quigley

March 27, 2009

For many years The Palestinian Arabs in Hamas and Fatah sent suicide bombers into Israel, and the Jews of Israel once more had to deal with death because they are Jews.

Then Israel built a Wall or Fence to keep these savages, and they truly are savages, out of their country. Yet this is what Israel was condemned for, the building of the Wall.

You se no matter what it does Israel cannot win.

Stephen Ritson on the cowardly Talk Radio Europe referred to the Wall as a “Land Grab” and refused to acknowledge that it was created in order to keep out these murderous savages and their suicide bombs strapped to their bodies.

Ritson says that the Wall is robbing Palestinians of their land. But this issue of the Wall robbing Palestinians of their land is false. This is not Palestinian land. At the very most all you can say is that this is disputed territory, which is why Israel has always used the term “disputed territories” in their literature.

There are very good reasons for this which are located in history. Ritson would have to deal with that history to back up what he says about the Wall.

The owner of this radio station a Jewish man called Maurice Boland from Dublin, once asked Ritson a simple question. Said Boland to Ritson…Before the Wall was built thousands of Israeli Jews were murdered and maimed by Palestinian savages. After the Wall was built none.

It was noticeable that Ritson refused to answer Boland. It is a simple fact that has to be answered.

Giving up on Ritson Boland said that he would leave him to somebody else (???) and in some exasperation called him “Stephen Mohammed Ritson”.

On a more recent occasion and argument between the two protagonists Boland called him “Stephen Ayotalloh Ritson”.

But these are very rare occasions when Boland takes on Ritson. Ritson is a highly intelligent person and competent journalist in other fields but he is biased against Israel. Israel suffers dreadfully in every utterance he makes, that is as far as I have heard and can judge.

In another programme this week Ritson referred to the Guardian slander against Israel which is saying that Israel carried out war crimes in the Gaza War against Hamas.

The essence of this issue is this, also reflected in the position of Ritson, aka Mohammed Ritson to use Boland´s nomenclature, is the following.

The answer concerns another occasion when Ritson refused to answer a simple and basic question.

On another programme during the war 2 months back a regular called Barry Norman asked Ritson the simple question: How can Israel stop the Arab Nazis from firing rockets onto Israeli people, that is onto Jews in the year of 2009 some 60 to 70 years after the Holocaust?

The Jews had thought that they were getting a place of sanctuary from Antisemitism. But they found that they were being subjected to rocket attacks from antisemites.

That is from Hamas who are actually denying to their followers that a Holocaust actually happened at all. They sometimes say that the Jews killed their own (Jewish) people.

Ritson refused to answer this simple question from Mr Norman.

An awful lot of rockets were involved in these attacks by these savages on the poor suffering Jews of Israel. Some say 8000 rockets fell on Israeli homes.

Many Jews have died although not thousands, but that is because they retreat to ground bunkers built into their homes. But why should Jews have to actually live like that in the year of 2009?

The reports that Ritson this week were referring to concerning War Crimes come from the Guardian especially, and one of the writers for the Guardian who is especially hostile to Israel is Seamus Milne. I believe that Milne is a communist but be advised, he is a communist as Joseph Stalin was a communist.

Anyway this is a piece of such writing in the last week by Milne

[begin extract from article in Guardian by Milne here]

Evidence of the scale of Israel‘s war crimes in its January onslaught on Gaza is becoming unanswerable. Clancy Chassay’s three films investigating allegations against Israeli forces in the Gaza strip, released by the Guardian today, include important new accounts of the flagrant breaches of the laws of war that marked the three-week campaign – now estimated to have left at least 1,400 Palestinians, mostly civilians, and 13 Israelis dead.

The films provide compelling testimony of Israel’s use of Palestinian teenagers as human shields; the targeting of hospitals, clinics and medical workers, including with phosphorus bombs; and attacks on civilians, including women and children – sometimes waving white flags – from hunter-killer drones whose targeting systems are so powerful they can identify the colour of a person’s clothes.

Naturally, the Israeli occupation forces’ spokesperson insists to Chassay that they make every effort to avoid killing civilians and denies using human shields or targeting medical workers – while at the same time explaining that medics in war zones “take the risk upon themselves”. By banning journalists from entering Gaza during its punitive devastation of the strip, the Israeli government avoided independent investigations of the stream of war crimes accusations while the attack was going on.

But now journalists and human rights organisations are back inside, doing the painstaking work, the question is whether Israel’s government and military commanders will be held to account for what they unleashed on the Palestinians of Gaza – or whether, like their US and British sponsors in Iraq and Afghanistan, they can carry out war crimes with impunity.

[end extract here]

Milne is quite simply repeating the propaganda and lies from Hamas. One of which is surely this

 “now estimated to have left at least 1,400 Palestinians, mostly civilians, ”

And the 3 films he refers to prove nothing.

Also Israel has proved that there are many lies told about the war. But really those who hate Israel do not care and do not look for proof.

Why is Milne so shameless in producing such obvious lies. I mean he claims that the most of those killed by the IDF were civilians. Where does he get this informattion from? It must be from Hamas. Milne is the mouthpiece of Hamas in other words.

I remember well the first action of the Israeli Army the IDF which was a strike against some kind of ceremony which the HAMAS POLICE FORCE were holding.

I also remember the pictures from that not of civilians but of Arab men very cleared dressed in uniform lying dead in that police compound. These were not children either and I do not think they were women (irony intended).

Does Ritson and Milne deny that Israel is at war with the Palestinian Arabs?  I think Israel has been at war with the Arabs in general from the very Balfour Declaration of 1917 because the Arabs simply do not wish for an Israeli state to exist, even though they the Arabs have achieved 21 independent states, now surrounding Israel on ALL SIDES.

Is there no sense of fairness on this score from people like Milne or Ritson?

Certainly Hamas were at war with Israel and we know this because they said and say so, that they will not rest until Israel is wiped off the map.

So why do Ritson and Milne side with Hamas and as we see with Milne cleary just mouth Hamas propaganda?

Ritson peppers his talk on this radio station with all kinds of assertions and claims against Israel. So does Milne.

Take the first phrase used in the above extract by Milne:

“Evidence of the scale of Israel‘s war crimes

What is the story “When did you last beat your wife”??? There is something of this in Milne´s method.

He is writing of Israel “When did you last commit a war crime”.

But there was no war crime or war crimes by Israel. Israel was defending itself against Arabs who are filled with antisemitism, that is hatred of Jews which is at the centre of Hamas ideology. This is quite easily proved.

To defend its people Israel has the right to use all methods of defence. We on 4international reject all this talk about disproportionate. The disproportionate part is the first rocket fired at a Jew living in Israel in 2009.

That is the position of the 4international. We defend the Jews of Israel unconditionally.

Ritson by the way on his programme on this now dreadful in political terms radio station, Talk Radio Europe, called these Hamas rockets “pea shooters”. But he is mistaken. What is really happening is that Jews in the year of 2009 cannot find any sanctuary from those Arabs who hate Jews. That is the essence of the matter.

And these antisemitic Arabs seek another Holocaust of the Jews.


by Felix Quigley

March 24, 2009


The key issue int he world today is the promotion of Hamas which is being carried out by the Obama team and by people like Tony Blair.


What is at stake here is this. The creation of a “Palestine” state will have Hamas at its head. And by its very nature this state will not ever recognize the right of Israel to exist, the right of Jews to have ONE state in Palestine, while the Arabs will have created TWO, that is twon on historical Palestine along with the other 20 or so, and the Jews will again be living ona  tiny section of that planned for them in the San Remo Treaty of 1920.

But it is the promotion of Hamas by Obama and Blair, by the US Empire and by the EU, that is the decisive factor.

Just as the Empire poisoned Milosevic in his Hague prison this means that there can be no compromise from the US EU Empire.

The economic crisis is snapping at their heels and they are moving on towards dictatorial rule.

In this Sharia will have its role to play and Islam is already being used to break down working class organizations.

The following is the nature of this rule. Antisemitism, blaming the crisis on the Jews, will be very central to the US Obama team.


But how is this working out down ont he ground of volatile Palestine/Israel!

Well it seems that a few minor details about Abbas Hamas are being overlooked, or rather stached under the carpet.

Those folk really do hate Jews. So much so that Abbas gained his doctorate on Holocaust Denial thesis. But the Big Daddy of antisemitism is certainly that Hamas crowd. And we have taken the trouble to have a look at this


[Start quote here]

From Palestinian Media Watch (in full — not yet online):

(Hamas is broadcasting this interesting version of Holocaust History)

Jewish leaders planned the Holocaust to kill “disabled and handicapped” Jews to avoid having to care for them, according to a Hamas TV educational program. As much of the world prepared to commemorate Yom HaShoah, Holocaust Remembrance Day, Hamas TV presented its latest sinister twist on Holocaust denial.

The Hamas TV educational program, broadcast last week, taught that the murder of Jews in the Holocaust was a Zionist plot with two goals:

1- To eliminate “disabled and handicapped” Jews by sending them to death camps, so they would not be a burden on the future state of Israel.

2- At the same time, the Holocaust served to make “the Jews seem persecuted” so they could “benefit from international sympathy.”

Amin Dabur, head of the Palestinian “Center for Strategic Research” explained that “the Israeli Holocaust – the whole thing was a joke, and part of the perfect show that [Zionist leader and future Israeli prime minister] Ben Gurion put on.” The “young energetic and able” were sent to Israel, while the handicapped were sent “so there would be a Holocaust.”…

[End quote here]


Blair the good catholic man, always travelling with the Koran in his hip pocket, being protected by Hamas Holocaust Deniers. Somehow given the role of the Vatican in History, that seems somehow apt.

What an image for New Labour. But it is another image that comes to mind here.

The nature of this future Hamas led Palestine state that Obama and the EU are now promoting is seen in an pic taken by Hamas itself as part of its own self promotion.

The image shows 5 Hamas operatives all dressed in white and carrying suicide belts. But the striking thing is that in the centre is a little kid and he too is wearing a suicide belt.

You can find this on


The complicated situation that is arising can be seen in the following report form DEBKAfile

[Begin report from DEBKAfile here]

By submitting his resignation as Palestinian prime minister Saturday, March 7, the pro-American Salam Fayyad removes a major roadblock to a power-sharing accord between the extremist Hamas, which rules the Gaza Strip, and Mahmoud Abbas’ Fatah, which governs the West Bank.

OK let it go! Abbas also is a Holocaust Denier. But everything is relative…FQ

The unity talks have still a way to go. They may fail as they have before. And Fayyad’s resignation may not be final.

And accord, however, would open the door to Hamas domination of the West Bank in the same way as the Iran-backed Palestinian Islamists threw the Fatah-dominated Palestinian Authority out of Gaza two years ago.

Fayyad confirmed that his resignation would go into effect after the “unity government” was formed – although not later than the end of March. His exit removes Washington’s man in the Palestinian Authority’s Ramallah government in perfect time for the power-sharing talks to resume in Cairo Tuesday March 10.

His action, three days after US secretary of state Hillary Clinton held well-publicized talks with Fayyad and Abbas in Ramallah, comes as a serious blow to America prestige and one up for Iran and its Palestinian proxy.

Clearly Abbas and Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak, godfather of “Palestinian unity”, are working to a different clock to that of Washington.

DEBKAfile‘s Middle East sources affirm that, by holding back from toppling the Hamas regime in Gaza, Israel must take responsibility for helping to empower the Palestinian terrorists to dictate a power-sharing deal on its terms and at its tempo.

The Palestinian negotiations will no doubt try and race toward a conclusion before the end of March at around the same time as Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu will be introducing his government coalition.

With all this happening, the Palestinian prime minister, a former World Bank economist in Washington, saw that in a unity government, his only function would be to act as a respectable non-terrorist address for the receipt of the $5.5 billion dollars the international donors meeting in Sharm e-Sheikh on March 2 approved for Gaza reconstruction.

This would reduce him to a figurehead, the public face of a Palestinian regime which brought the Hamas terrorists to power in the two Palestinian territories, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.

It is too soon to judge the success of this dodge in persuading world governments to cough up the funds they have committed for Gaza. Hamas has no other need of the former Washington-based banker and in fact, one of its conditions for sharing government with Fatah was his removal.

The deal is not yet in the bag. More than once, DEBKAfile‘s Middle East sources have stressed that the Palestinian extremists and their Syrian and Iranian sponsors would on no account form a partnership with a Palestinian element cooperating with the United States and Israel in security and intelligence matters. Fayyad epitomizes this joint effort and Abbas may decide to sacrifice him for an agreement with Hamas.

Once installed in government, Hamas would get set for sweeping the coming Palestinian presidential and parliamentary elections in 2010, thereby closing the circle of its domination of the West Bank.

This election date was another of Hamas’ conditions for its partnership-in-government with Fatah.


This unfolding scenario, which bodes ill for central Israel as Hamas’ next target after the missile-battered South, could have been prevented.

DEBKAfile‘s military sources report that towards the end of its January offensive, the IDF command gave Israel’s security cabinet an estimated four-hour timetable for seizing Hamas leaders hidden in bunkers in Gaza City together with the captive Israeli soldier Gilead Shalit. Israeli intelligence had discovered their whereabouts and the way to their hideout had been cleared. Hamas was no longer fighting.

But prime minister Ehud Olmert, defense minister Ehud Barak and foreign minister Tzipi Livni, who headed the war cabinet, shied away from a decision. Their indecision, by offering the terrorist leaders a lifeline against total defeat, left them free to come out of their holes and gear up for their next venture, takeover of Palestinian government.

It may be recalled that the Olmert government also distinguished itself in 2006 by succumbing to misguided pressure from Washington and letting Hamas run for election. Its victory paved the way for its seizure of power in the Gaza Strip in January 2006. Finally, in January 2008, the same government, this time with Ehud Barak attached as defense minister, opened the door for Hamas to move in on the West Bank by sealing a pact with Fatah.

This dangerous reality may be lurking for Israel’s post-election administration under Netanyahu before it has a chance to take preventive action. He need not count on salvation from Washington. The Obama administration, Secretary Clinton and special envoy George Mitchell, would no doubt find it politic to avoid noticing the terrorist element dominating the Palestinian “unity government.” They would insist that their dealings with the Palestinians are confined to the “good,” non-terrorist factions.

Washington would try and hold up the Palestinian security forces and presidential guard trained by US national security adviser James Jones’ American instructors as safeguards against any Hamas takeover of Ramallah and other West Bank towns.

It would be convenient to forget that those same Palestinian Authority forces did not fire a shot against the coup Hamas staged in the Gaza Strip in June 2007.

Palestinian PM Fayyad’s Exit May Usher in Hamas’ West Bank takeover

DEBKAfile Exclusive Report

March 7, 2009

Final points

The DEBKA report is a little uncertain and confusing.

Just take the Yugoslavia experience. The US Empire operatives like Holbrooke appeared at times to back the moderate. But that was a ruse. They were backing the Fascists like Tudjman and the Islamist variety of Fascist like Izetbegovic from the beginning.

The US Empirists just make it appear like that.

Then wham bang they come out and line up with the Fascists.

So of course the name of the game for the US Empire is to get Hamas into power in the Palestine State. Then the Middle East will really hot up.


by Felix Quigley

March 24, 2009

The modern form of anti-Semitism and with it the New Holocaust of the Jews is taking shape


  1. The Media want Israel do a deal with Holocaust Denying Hamas
  2. The modern states of the world, led by the US Empire in the making, want Israel lie down in the flea pit with mangy Holocaust Deniers


The name of the game is called “Making Hamas Kosher”




Caroline Glick discusses this bending over backwards in How Hamas became ‘kosher’

Sadly, the answer is clear. Western leaders are not pursuing peace in these processes. They are pursuing appeasement. They call this appeasement process a peace process for two reasons. First, they know their countrymen don’t like the sound of appeasement. And second, by claiming to be championing the noble goal of peace in our time, they feel free to attack anyone who points out the folly of their actions as a warmongering member of the Israel Lobby.






Cairo interrupts Palestinian unity talks for US-EU approval of deal

DEBKAfile Exclusive Report

DEBKAfile’s Cairo sources report that last week, Egypt’s senior mediator, Gen. Omar Suleiman flew to Washington and foreign minister Aboul Geith traveled to Brussels to ask their governments to underwrite the proposal for a Palestinian unity government. Without this input, they explained, there is no point in bringing the negotiations to a close. The Palestinian Fatah and Hamas negotiators are standing by in Cairo for answers.

The fate of the captive Israeli soldier Gilead Shalit also hangs on the outcome of these talks.

The two Egyptian officials asked to clear with the US and EU sections of the text that circumvent the Middle East Quartet’s stipulations for talking to Hamas.


Those sections are itemized exclusively here by DEBKAfile:

1. Hamas’ admission to the umbrella Palestinian Liberation Organization amounts to the radical Palestinian group’s acceptance of all past agreements the PLO signed with Israel, including the Oslo Framework Accords.

2. Hamas is absolved from publicly announcing its recognition of Israel on the grounds that its rival Mahmoud Abbas’ Fatah never formally recognized the Jewish state either, except for Yasser Arafat in person.

3. The Palestinian unity government’s guidelines will not recognize previously signed agreements, including those with Israel, but state that the new ministers will “respect” them.

Suleiman and Gheit informed US and European officials that Saudi King Abdullah had approved the text and Syrian president Bashar Assad had promised the king and Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak to sell it to Hamas leaders.

International endorsement by the West was essential before a Palestinian unity government was installed, to spare it from boycott.

Cairo believes that once American and European endorsements are in hand, Israel’s designated prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu can be persuaded to quietly agree to live with the deal without saying so publicly.







The Egyptian brokers believe he can be won over by Cairo consenting for the first time to the complete severance of the Gaza Strip’s ties with Israel. The border crossings would be shut down permanently except for fuel supplies and Gaza provisioned in future through Egypt. This arrangement has always been adamantly rejected by President Mubarak.

DEBKAfile’s Middle East sources add that if this can be arranged and the two Palestinian factions can bury their differences over the composition of their shared government and electoral system before the Palestinian general election on Jan. 25, 2010 (they agree on the date), then the way ought to be clear for Gilead Shalit to be freed as part of the Palestinian package.

This may the long way round, but our political sources report that if Netanyahu is able to build a government with Labor’s Ehud Barak aboard to stay on as defense minister, he will go along with this formula as offering the best prospects. With this in mind, Barak proposed returning Israel’s negotiating team to Cairo to continue working on the Shalit case after the talks broke down. The defense minister has always insisted in trusting Egypt to act as go-between for Israel’s dealings with the Palestinians.

There are still a great many ifs before this package assumes final form, but several processes are afoot in this direction.



JPOST editorializes

FOR ISRAEL, however, who recognizes whom, and how, goes to the heart of the conflict – since the refusal to recognize the inalienable right of the Jewish people to self-determination anywhere between the Mediterranean and the Jordan signals Palestinian society’s continuing to define our conflict in zero-sum terms. So if Suleiman’s creative diplomacy ushers Hamas into a Palestinian government without it having to change its stripes, he will be undoing decades of painstaking steps Palestinians and Israelis have taken toward mutual recognition. That would put a question mark over the entire Oslo edifice, which has been preserved by successive Israeli governments.


Put differently: If the international community turns its back on the most elementary prerequisites for Palestinian-Israeli cooperation – mutual recognition, non-belligerency and adherence to past agreements – it will be tearing asunder the existing basis for relations between the Palestinian Authority and Israel.




Seeking new roads always in the context of the historical crisis the Empire led by the US bombed a totally innocent country, Yugoslavia as it then was, Serbia, in order to enforce its rule and to bring into existence a totally Islamist state, which is Kosovo.


Kosovo represents the union of the Empire with the Saudis, iran and Islam in general and points to the way in which the new Empire is going to rule.


Kosovo was the classic Jihad operation but Jihad moulded by the US Empire.


A clear majority of Serbs in 1900, a slight majority of Serbs pre 1939, the decimation of the Serbs due to the Nazi Holocaust in the Balkans, helped on by the Stalinist Tito promotion of Albanian power in Kosovo post 1945, by the 1990s the Serb population has reduced down to 10 per cent, and after the NATO war on Serbia there are now a few percentage of Serbs holding on in Northern Kosovo.


Classic Jihadist takeover, with one difference, direction of the drama in the hands of the Empire, chief director Holbrook and Clinton.




That there is the objective basis for the unity of Serb and Jew. Include also in that unity of Kurd, Berber, Copt and all minorities under Islam.


The aim of the Islam Fascists has been to so puncture Jewish nationalism that it finds itself defenceless against the Jihad.


The final touches are now being put to this by the Empire. The alliance in question is the US Empire in league with the Jihad, specifically a Palestine state under hamas (effectively) which does not recognize Israel, or what is left of Israel!


Add to that, as a special Jihadist insurance, the Iranian Nuclear Bomb, along with the Hamas and Hizbullah technology for the Nuclear “Dirty Bomb”.




The Coming War

A former, highly-placed U.S. intelligence official who breaks his silence on the increasing probability of abandonment of Israel by the U.S. and other Western countries based on what he termed “malicious intelligence.” (Click here for Part I).

By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

isus10 March 2009: The Middle East will be the site of “the coming war,” and Israel will be at it’s epicenter. If we survive as a nation, the U.S. will not be on the side of righteousness in this war, instead turning our back to – or our guns against – our only true friend in the Middle East: Israel.




Intelligence for national security purposes must not be subjugated by politics or financial interests, otherwise it becomes malicious at the hands with those having agendas. If one chooses to argue that Iraq was the victim of big oil interests, than that same argument must extend to our relationship with Israel and opposing Arab countries. In other words, money talks – and it talks loudly, frequently drowning out the truth with political propaganda propagated by a media already influenced by Arab financial interests. And with money comes power and influence.


“Now you can see where intelligence and politics meet and often collide,” a reference made during my initial interview with this former U.S. intelligence official. Now this intelligence official explained that the Obama administration is being purposely filled with people who are truly anti-Israel, either because of their own financial interests or a larger globalist agenda that does not include Israel, or for that matter, the United States as a sovereign nation.


“Whatever the reason, the anti-Israel, pro-Islamist policy makers will be appointed or have already infiltrated nearly all levels of the U.S. government. These are the people who place anti-Semitic references in school textbooks, promote revisionist history regarding Islam, 9/11, and are the same people who allow or even promote the Islamic agendas in all aspects of Western society, especially the restrictions on speech against Islam. With regard to the latter, note that the United Nations is quite involved in forcing the restriction of “hate speech” and the implementation of global standards, some that have already been adapted by European nations.”


“Closer to home, there is an organized, concerted effort on the part of these individuals to foster an atmosphere of anti-Semitism throughout the West, and in particular within the United States. This is an important aspect of their global objectives, and includes blaming the Jews for our current financial crisis. The majority of Americans might not care about or even understand the situation with the Palestinians, Israel or the Middle East, but they certainly care about their own finances, especially when they see their retirement funds evaporating before their eyes. Now, they become afraid, anxious and angry.”

“Associate Israel or Jewish interests with global instability, Americans will become upset with the Jews and Israel. Blame them for being responsible for or contributing to the loss of their retirement and their economic problems, they will become angry. The objective is to erode support for the Jews and Israel in America, and is being done with the assistance of a media influenced and infiltrated by anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian, Arab and Muslim apologists. At the same time that the anti-Semitic undercurrent is perpetuated in America, world pressure against Israel will mount. Expect to see an increase in hostile acts against Jews in the U.S., Jewish synagogues and other Jewish assets,” stated this source.



Meanwhile, in order for the globalist agenda to succeed, the United States cannot remain a close ally of Israel. That relationship is being undermined from within, and the information being publicly disseminated is being manipulated from within – by a compromised and all-too-willing media.” According to this source, the groundwork to get to this point has been in the works for years, if not decades. “It was just placed on the fast track under Obama, who has promised his allegiance to the Arabs. If not already, this will become quite evident to even the most skeptical, much to the consternation of the majority of American Jews who voted for him.”


As for the coming war, it has already begun as a war for the minds, hearts and souls of the people in the West, and will manifest itself quickly to a physical war between Israel and her Arab neighbors. It will likely begin as it has in the past, with a missile or rocket fired by HAMAS, followed by a measured response from Israel. Then a good dose of propaganda from the media, who will portray the Jews as murderers of innocent men, women and children. Then outrage and condemnation from the international community, led by the United Nations, who will demand peace at the expense of Israel. This time, the U.N. will have the cooperation of the United States under the Obama administration.

We will send troops as part of a larger ‘peacekeeping mission,’ but they will most certainly not be there to help the Israelis. But first, America must be convinced that being an ally of Israel is not in our best interests, and they are the antagonists in this scenario. By electing who we have, and by the appointments already made and policies already implemented, they’re off to a pretty good start, don’t you think?”


Answer Lies in the Ayers affair.

A rather good study of the whole history of these two men, Pbama and Ayers, has been done over on Emperors New Clothes by Jared Israel. It appears that Obama was closer to 20 than 8 when the Weathermen were rattling around



Also look at this site

Numerous people have questioned how a junior senator from Illinois – a virtual unknown – could rise from virtual obscurity to the leader of the free world in seven years. Many of the same people have asked how that same person could rise to power despite still-unanswered questionsof his eligibility, and a past checkered by questionable associates and associations.

The answers lie in the globalist agenda, one that has no place for Israel, beyond Israel being the catalyst for the implementation of a new world order.

[end of interpretation of events by “Homeland Security]


The reason that Ayers is so important and relevant to Obama is that the terrorist Weathermen was the mechanism that the US elite used in order to turn the students and intellectuals away from the American working class and into state controlled terrorism.

In that regard just as happened with the Provisional IRA it became controlled by the state intelligence services.


Obama is essentially out of that intelligence and state infested milieu and he is in all likelihood also controled by state forces, the state within the state.


That is the people who place profit first middle and last. The populist Obama may not actually be fully aware yet that he is being played like a puppet.





March 24, 2009

This is a special report from The Economist, which is no friend of Israel.

It makes the very interesting point that Israeli people are very motivated because they are a few millions and surrounded by a thousand of millions of Islamists.

There are of course other reasons. The report does not go into detail about the many inventions in the computer and medical world, that as we speak are of great service to humanity.

So then why the illogical hatred which many countries have for Israel and for Jews, as was on show in the horrific anti Israel marches during the Gaza war, when some likened Gaza to the Warsaw Ghetto, others directly called Israel and Jews “Nazis” etc?

[Begin report from The Economist here]

A special report on entrepreneurship

Lands of opportunity

Mar 12th 2009
From The Economist print edition

Israel, Denmark and Singapore show how entrepreneurialism can thrive in different climates


DOV MORAN’S desk is littered with the carcasses of dismembered phones. Mr Moran has already had one big breakthrough: inventing the now ubiquitous memory stick. But he dreams of another one: he wants to separate the “brains” of the various gizmos that dominate our lives from the “bodies” to enable people to carry around tiny devices that they will be able to plug into anything from phones to cameras to computers. Mr Moran sold his memory-stick business to SanDisk for $1.6 billion, creating a thriving technology cluster near his office. This time he wants to build an Israeli business that will last, challenging the giants of the camera and phone businesses.

Israel is full of would-be Dov Morans. It is home to 4,000 high-tech companies, more than 100 venture-capital funds and a growing health-care industry. Innovations developed in the country include the Pentium chip (Intel), voicemail (Comverse), instant messaging (Mirabilis, Ubique), firewalls (Checkpoint) and the “video pill”, which allows doctors to study your insides without the need for invasive surgery.

Even more than other countries, Israel has America to thank for its entrepreneurial take-off. A brigade of American high-tech companies, including Intel and Microsoft, have established research arms there. And a host of Israelis who once emigrated to America in search of education and opportunity have returned home, bringing American assumptions with them. Many Israeli entrepreneurs yo-yo between Silicon Valley and Tel Aviv; almost 70 Israeli companies are traded on NASDAQ.

The Israeli government helped by providing a ready supply of both human and physical capital. Israel has the world’s highest ratio of PhDs per person, the highest ratio of engineers and scientists and some of the world’s best research universities, notably Technion. The country’s native talent was supplemented by the arrival of 400,000 well-educated Jewish refugees from the former Soviet empire.

However, Israel’s main qualification for entrepreneurialism is its status as an embattled Jewish state in a sea of Arab hostility. The Israeli army not only works hard to keep the country at the cutting edge of technology, it also trains young Israelis (who are conscripted at 18) in the virtues of teamwork and improvisation. It is strikingly common for young Israelis to start businesses with friends that they met in the army. Add to that a high tolerance of risk, born of a long history and an ever-present danger of attack, and you have the makings of an entrepreneurial firecracker.