The following is now very relevant, was written back in 2006


Mirolub Jevtic le 08/02/2006
Source : Jihad Watch

University of Sarajévo and Belgrade,
Professor of science politics and specialist of islamic revivalism in Balkans and ex-USSR

Special to Jihad Watch: Professor Miroljub Jevtiæ assesses the situation in Kosovo and beyond. Professor Jevtiæ is a professor at the College of Political Science at the Belgrade University. He is visiting the United States this month with Bishop Artemije of Raska and Prizren (which includes Kosovo and Metohija) in a mission to awaken the West -– and especially the United States -– against the ill-advised direction of current policy and the disastrous impact it would have on Kosovo’s beleaguered Christian Serbs.

Professor Jevtiæ is the author of numerous articles on the theme of Islam, and has appeared as an expert on Islam on TV and in print media across the Balkans. He is an author of nine books dealing with the influence of Islam on the world politics, including Religion and Politics: Introduction to politics of religion (2002); Islam in the works of Ivo Andric (2000); All of Our Misconceptions (1999); The Crime Awaits punishment (1998); Muslims Between the Faith and a Nation (1996); Islam and Geopolitical Logic (1995); Albanians and Islam (1995); From the Islamic Declaration to the Religious War in Bosnia (1993); and Modern Jihad as War (1989). Other writings include “Bosnia In Paris” (December 3, 2005); “The West Must Learn Islam” (September 1, 2005); and “The Funadamentals of al-Qaeda in Kosovo: Islamization as factor of Albanization in the region of former Yugoslavia” (June 12, 2005).

Negotiations regarding the future status of Kosovo are about to begin. It is increasingly clear that the overwhelming majority of the world media, not to mention the government of the United States and its allies, favor giving independence to the Serbian province of Kosovo and Metohija, which since the 1999 war has been administered by the United Nations under NATO military control. Or, to put it more accurately, the western world is in favor of detaching Kosovo from (Christian) Serbia by fiat and making it into an independent (Muslim) state.
The main argument of those supporting this scenario, — notably in the United States, where advocates of the Muslim Albanian cause have — is that by doing so they would repair their image in the Islamic world and show that they do not have anti-Islamic inclinations. This, they think, would co-opt the influence of Islamic “extremists.” For example, as recommended in the official report of the 9-11 Commission: “Just as we did in the Cold War, we need to defend our ideals abroad vigorously. America does stand up for its values. The United States defended, and still defends, Muslims against tyrants and criminals in Somalia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan, and Iraq. If the United States does not act aggressively to define itself in the Islamic world, the extremists will gladly do the job for us.” In addition, they think that the moderate Muslims in Kosovo (as the West incorrectly considers Kosovo’s Albanians to be) will create a prosperous, multiethnic democracy, which will, while still remaining sufficiently Muslim, serve as an example of how one can remain a Muslim and be secular at the same time.
This policy is founded on grave misconceptions. The first misconception is that by offering aid to the Kosovo Muslims, the hatred of the Islam world for the United States of America would be mitigated. The result would, in fact, be the opposite. In fact, the independence of Kosovo will increase the hatred for the US. One reason for displeasure of the Islamic world will be found, first of all, in the fact that the Muslims would still not be in control of what they claim as their third most holy place, the al-Aqsa mosque which is built on the site of the Temple of Solomon. And the entire Islamic world believes that Israel can control the whole of Jerusalem, including al-Aqsa, only because it has the support of the United States. Without the American help, they believe that Israel would be destroyed — its own courage, wisdom and devotion to its cause notwithstanding.
However, there is no religious Muslim, whether “moderate” or “extreme,” who does not consider that Jerusalem must be part of a Palestinian state. And the existence of Israel denies the possibility of this. Therefore, from their point of view, the infidels can give the Muslims Kosovo; we can give them Bosnia, Kashmir, Chechnya, New York itself, as well as Paris, they will not be reconciled as long as they do not have sovereignty over Jerusalem. Should they relinquish this idea, be it in their dreams only, they would burn in hell. But Jerusalem cannot belong to the Muslims because the West, and particularly the United States, will not permit it. So if America can give Kosovo to the Albanian Muslims, they can certainly give Jerusalem to the Palestinian Muslims. But they stubbornly refuse to do so! And “Muslim rage” — before which the entire world quakes over a few cartoons – will burn even hotter.
In the psychology of all religious Muslims, anyone who is against taking Jerusalem away from Israel is an enemy, whether they are willing to say it openly or not. Moreover, a religious Muslim believes that it is not normal for the Christians not to reason in the same way and not to try to show to the whole world that their faith is superior to that of other faiths. The fact that in traditionally Christian countries the number of Christian believers, as well as the number of Christian places of worship, is on the decline, whereas the number of Muslims and mosques is on the increase, is seen as the triumph of the true faith over the false faith—the triumph of Islam over Christianity. This is why the fact that since the arrival of NATO to Kosovo over 150 Christian churches have been destroyed and some 400 mosques have been built, or are under construction, is for the Muslims a proof that if there is a faith which is supported by true God — it is Islam! Because, why would the Christian God, why would Jesus, permit the destruction of churches, where He, Jesus, is glorified? Why would He, at the same time, permit the construction of mosques, where His existence as God is denied? Why would He permit it, moreover, in the presence of men who bear arms and who claim to be Christians?

So, instead of seeing the presence of the West in Kosovo and Metohija as a proof of religious tolerance, the Albanian Muslims, and Muslims in general, see it as a proof of the fact that Islam is the true faith, the faith which is the only way to the salvation after death. The granting of independence to Kosovo would simply validate the conviction of Muslim extremists that theirs is the only correct policy, and that they should continue on the path they have followed so far. The number of followers of this doctrine would only continue to grow as it has done so far. This would lead to the increase in the number of those who are against “moderate” Islamic regimes and who will begin, as recent Palestinian and Egyptian elections have shown, to undermine moderate and (even minimally) pro-western governments. Such countries will be headed by people who think like Osama Bin Laden, or others of similar ilk. They will build into their foreign policy platforms their aspirations to transform their confrontations with the West into a global victory.
Their first target will be Israel. Because now, after resolving their problems in Kosovo and Bosnia, they will be able to concentrate with all their might on the main objective—the sovereignty over Jerusalem. First, they will use all diplomatic channels to pressure the West to deny Israel’s right to exist. If they do not succeed in this, they will prepare for the destruction of Israel by military force. If the West tries to thwart them, their aspirations to achieve parity in military technology will grow until they have reached supremacy. Afterwards, in the name of jihad, Israel and the entire western civilization will be destroyed.
Moreover, no advocate of this ideology has an iota of doubt regarding the humaneness of this position. This is because they do not kill out of hatred; they kill out of love. The non-Muslims live in sin because they do things prohibited by God: they drink alcohol, they eat pork, they recognize the rights of homosexuals, they tolerate the scantiness of female attire. All these are sins punishable by death according to Shari’a law if the transgressors continue to sin in spite of God’s warning as expressed in the Koran. The killing of these sinners simply ensures for them a more clement treatment on Judgment Day, because, if they are not killed for these sins, who knows what other sins they might yet commit?
This was the reasoning of Muhammad Atta and his comrades in terror when they killed on September 11. This will be the reasoning of an ever increasing number of Muslims who are not yet ready to see the West as a serious force which should not be taken lightly. This is how the Muslims will reason when Kosovo becomes purely Muslim and when the last traces of Christianity are erased from it, erased moreover with the help of countries which claim to be Christian. Granting the independence to Kosovo will be taken as proof of Europe’s own wish to cease to exist, as it not only allows the expansion of Islam but is actively promoting it by aiding those who are destroying churches, raping nuns, spitting on crosses and daubing with excrement holy images of Christ. And Christians represented by KFOR personnel, far from trying to stop these acts of desecration, stand idly by averting their eyes. Such a Kosovo will be a base for jihad aggression against Europe keeping Christian forces tied in the Balkans while the center of the Islamic world will devote itself to the unimpeded destruction of Israel.
The only way to change the situation, to avert this next escalation in the clash of civilizations is to mobilize the entire Christian world against the independence of Kosovo and Metohija and to support its continuance within Christian Serbia. The Muslims would not like this, but they understand that this is what should be done. Because in their minds they know that it is logical for the Christians to act together. And so they will understand that the Christian world is strong and should not be provoked. Regimes now in power in Egypt, Tunisia, and Algeria would not lose the support of the West. It will be understood that the relations of these regimes with the West are the only possible path for the Muslims, because the Christian West is strong.
This is the way of averting the clash of civilizations, which will be inevitable if we continue on the path we are following now. This does not mean that there will be friendship between the West and Islam, but there will not be open war either. There will only be the necessary collaboration. Besides the Koran orders the believers to respect those who are strong, because according to Islam strength always comes from God. God knows who should be given strength and who should be tested. And Muslims can only be friends with Muslims. The Koran is clear on this: Sura IX verse 23 begins: “O, ye who believe, choose not your fathers nor your brethren for friends if they take pleasure in disbelief rather than faith…”

Clash of Civilizations 2006: Today Kosovo — Tomorrow Jerusalem?


By Felix Quigley

July 24, 2009

The Goebbels (Obama) team are not alone. We have just witnessed how Obama, Mitchell and Hilary Clinton have called for the numbering of Jewish births in what are misnamed “The Territories”!!!, which is really Judea (You know Judea aka land of the Jews)


Count those births from those pesky Jews in those thar territories!!!


A slight interconnection here to another little historical truth. Jews have lived on that land, in those hills, drinking that water, tilling that soil, having their children, bringing them up, reading quietly to themselves the pages of their special history and book the Bible, for 4000 years. But the comparision underlines the anti-Semitic Obama team. They have lived there as Jews. “Palestinians” have lived there all of 4 decades, since 1967


But the dopey business man Mitchell and the lesbian Hilary Clinton is now all about counting those little and newly arrived Jews.


There must be a word for this but I cannot discover it. Perhaps “Jew Hatred”!!!


Expect one huge growth now in Jew hatred in the world as a whole.


We are dealing now with one great apparatus, a kind of complicated machine, which is the world capitalist economy.


The contradictions in this global apparatus are such that moves must be made to


  1. create rigid systems of government whereby workers are forced to knuckle down and be used to insert value into capital
  2. Great waste of human beings and their potential as mass unemployment internationally is inevitable
  3. Use of Fascist ideologies, Islam being but one of these but a particularly destructive and deadly one


Israel the little land of the persecuted through the ages Jews is No 1 scapegoat


Of course the oil and energy crisis in the world cannot be solved within capitalism. There are spasmodic and isolated examples but as a rule capitalism cannot plan, or especially pre plan. All it can do and all it does is follow the market.


Now there opens up a market for the creation of wind turbines etc but too late. Britain as one example is closing down its wind turbine creation plant because the nation is in deep crisis.


This is a clear example of failure to plan.


China is such a vast country that it is able to keep in place some of the socialized forms of production and state planning that the revolution put in place.


So it is no accident that China can now step into the opportunity of wind turbine manufacture that the abject Brits have to abandon.


This is a partial example of socialised planning. But China still cannot exist as an isolated socialised unit. It too is caught up in the globality of the world system and will be attacked with ruthless venom by capitalism.


One thing will unite all of these great world powers, from Europe, to Russia, to America and to China.


Followed by smaller capitalist outfits like Ireland and Spain!


Sacrifice the tiny state of Israel, the Jewish Homeland, to the Arabs in payment for their oil.


This is going to be the reality that faces the Jews of Israel and of the whole world, because Israel remains their only place of refuge, in the context of growing anti-Semitism.


This is a danger of great Jewish extinction which is quite real. The Arabs were fully intent in killing all Jews in 1942 in a great butchery that surpassed even what happened to Jews and Serbs in Europe.


So what can be done to stop this?


We on 4international are most hopeful of the future.


This is because we believe that the crisis in capitalism is deep and is not episodic but is of a completely historical nature.


The great nemesis of the capitalists, the working class, we insist does exist.


And the great issue of today and of future days is to create the Trotskyist leadership


In America only 2 Jewish organizations have proved to be principled> Camera and Zionist Organization of America. All the rest, all of the Jewish leaders and parties are traitors to the Jewish cause.


It is in that context that ZStreet has been launched and the Trotskyist vanguard of the 4international are throwing all of our weight behind this amazing new development.


This is an affirmation of what we said above. The working class will fight, American Jews as part of this American ordinary people will also fight, and not fight in isolation as Jews alone.


The whole orientation of ZStreet is towards linking up with friends in the Non Jewish world. That is the correct tactic for Jews.  Inside the socialist revolution Jews and Trotskyist leadership can ensure a safe place in the world, their historic Zion Homeland, where they will create and be assisted in having a place where they are free…to be Jews, in whatever way they decide to be. And the Bible will remain the centre of their historical being because 4000 years are also part of that history.



To sum up


All capitalist countries will sacrifice the Jews once again


Such is the still significance of oil they will sacrifice the Jews to the Arabs and to Islam


The capitalist crisis is two edged as far as Jews are concerned. The crisis will create the forces of Fascism which could eliminate the Jews. But the crisis can also create the Trotskyist leadership which will save the Jews. It is all down now to leadership.


The hard decisions that every Jewish person and every supporter of Israel Jewish or not must face are contained in this comment to Israpundit by Nahum

[begin comment here]

My question to everyone who reads this blog and for all commenters.
A- Does anybody really believe a peace (not peace agreement) can be somehow attained with the Arabs living in so called territories?

1- If Yes why do you think so?
2- If no why do you think not?

B- Is our existence dependent on the good will of America or anybody else?

1- If Yes why>
2- If no why not?

C- Is there a general consensus in Israel as to what are Israels national interests?

D- What are they?

Same set of questions re: EU
Same questions substituting any other country

What happens when Iran goes nuclear? What happens when Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Algeria and other countries not yet thought about go nuclear as well?

Who would benefit or lose when that scenario happens? Consequences for Israel and the world?

Would withdrawing and destroying settlements on the WB precipitate a civil war in Israel? In such a case would a second Jewish State be feasible?

What happens if Hizbolla wins today in Lebanon today? Will Obama recognize it? Will he then recognize Hamas? How would recognition impact on Israel?

BB is set to submit to the public his plan or Peace with the Arabs ala Glicks suggestion in her article May 21. Counter Hussein O. with our own plan. Won’t work, I think and we find a lot of resistance here in Israel from bothe the right and the left. Looks like BB will cave cave completely and declare for a 2 state option with stipulations that everyubody including BB will ignore in the future. We’ve been down that road before. (14 stipulations for accepting road map)

Assuming a forced deal can be made will it bring peace disarmament in the region cessation of Arab demands and terror?

If the ans to most of my questions is in the negative why play the game? Why pretend? Why weaken ourselves internally and externally for fear of sanctions etc. America will continue to support and supply with same weapons if not better than it supplies to Israel. any deal with the Arabs will not reduce the Arms build-up on all sides and we can’t compete long term in such an environment. Iranian Nukes will nullify Israeli nuclear deterrent and everybody will seek them… Do we bomb Egypt when they upgrade their current program?

Comment by yamit82 — June 7, 2009 @ 1:07 pm

[end comment here]



by Felix Quigley

24 July, 2009

The following proposal written in today tot he Jewish blog Israpundit is indeed very reasonable.


Here we have this antisemitic team of chancers around Obama trying to lord it over the world, flying here there and everywhere, today it is Georgia with its close historical connectens to Russia and Eastern Europe, tomorrow it is to the land of the Jews where they have special relations with the Fascist antisemitic Hamas

What next?

Well next step is for Jews to ask Obama is he actually an American at all. Or is he a stooge which the US Media has placed into power, a George Soros New World Empire stooge.

[begin comment here]

Before anything happens regarding Israel, I first propose that Obama show his long form birth certificate to prove he was born in the United States! Because until Barack Obama’s legitimacy as President of the United States is first sorted out, all his policies are moot! Therefore the Israeli government’s response regarding Obama’s demand to stop even natural growth of Jewish communities in Judea & Samaria should be, first you show us your birth certificate than we’ll talk. And this is the legal point, the government of Israel can’t deal with the current presidential administration because Barack Obama has sealed up any and all personal records (birth certificate, school records, etc.) that are evidence in proving his background. The government of Israel cannot commit to any legal agreements with the U.S. government because one party to all the contracts and treaties refuses to reveal his true identity! No legal agreements can be binding if one of the two parties is actively concealing his identity because in the end, if Obama is proven to have been born outside of the U.S. then Obama has committed fraud by misrepresentation! Under this fraud, any legal contracts or agreements made between the Obama administration and Israel will become null and void!

So in order to protect themselves, the Israelis’ response to all the Obama administration demands should be the following: in order to best protect the State of Israel, we the government of Israel are unwilling to legally commit to any international agreements and/or treaties with the government of the United States at the present time. We the government of Israel at this time also legally refuse to partake in any international peace and/or economic conferences with the United States that affect our country. In doing so we are protecting our country and the citizens of Israel from any actions that might be imposed on Israel by the current President of the United States who might not truly possess the legal authority of that office. Until and/or unless Barack Obama can prove to the government of Israel that he was born in the United States, we must take the position that Mr. Obama is committing a fraud due to his refusal and his active concealment of all his personal identification. Therefore, we the government of Israel must protect our nation’s safety by refusing to enter into any international commitments with the present commander and chief of the U.S.A. because all agreements become legally nullified if Barack Obama is proven to be born outside of the United States. The current actions of Mr. Obama lead us to believe that Barack Obama is actively concealing factual evidence that can prove he was born outside of the United States. Therefore the government of Israel refuses to place its country and its citizens at risk by entering into any international agreements with the Obama administration for fear these agreements might at some future date become null and void. Therefore we the Israel government must have proof that Barack Obama was born in the U.S.A. before we even consider any international agreements being offered or suggested by the current American administration.

[end comment here]

It is now more clear than it has ever been in history. The US is openly the enemy of Jews and their Homeland which is Israel.

Let us on 4international add our voice to this comment.


Obama, show Americans your credentials!


The name of “Tamimi” should be totally familiar to all progressive people, and certainly to socialists.

In this essay John Spencer of Jihadwatch does a great exposure of Tamimi, and thus of Islam


“Tamimi distinguishes good Muslims from their adversaries this way: ‘We love death. They love life.'”

“Tamimi distinguishes good Muslims from their adversaries this way: ‘We love death. They love life.'”

“Good Muslims”? I guess that makes Tamimi a venomous Islamophobe. Expect denunciations from CAIR momentarily, Tamimi.

Meanwhile, Tamimi himself may have something like this in mind:

“Say (O Muhammad): O ye who are Jews! If ye claim that ye are favoured of Allah apart from (all) mankind, then long for death if ye are truthful.” — Qur’an 62:6

“Canada’s new Taliban-booster says good Muslims ‘love death,'” by Terry Glavin in the National Post, July 21 (thanks to Paul):

“Long live the Taliban” might seem an unlikely thing for a prominent anti-war figure to declare, but that’s today’s peace movement for you. Stranger still, the man who recently uttered those words, Azzam Tamimi, is a central figure in a new Toronto-based institute that is embarking upon what it describes as a national campaign to cultivate wholesome, faith-based civic virtues among Canada’s young Muslims.The Al-Fauz Institute for Islamic Thought says its purpose is to teach young Muslims how to apply Islamic ideas to Canada’s pluralistic society and “prepare young minds that will take up the mantle of the Muslim community.” Tamimi is scheduled to launch the institute’s ambitious public-relations and proselytizing efforts in Canada with a July 24-27 Islamic history course at Ryerson University.

But Tamimi has loudly renounced democracy, explicitly praises suicide bombers, and he’s said he’d even be happy to blow himself up in Israel: “It’s the straight way to pleasing my God and I would do it if I had the opportunity.” Tamimi distinguishes good Muslims from their adversaries this way: “We love death. They love life.”


“Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain…” — Qur’an 9:111

Tamimi recently proclaimed: “I don’t believe in democracy anymore,” and it was at an anti-Israel rally in Dublin only three months ago that Tamimi declared: “With regard to their attitudes to liberation, I say ‘Long Live the Taliban’.”You’d never know any of this from the billing the Al-Fauz institute gives Tamimi. He’s presented as a Palestinian-born British academic and a “political activist.” His leading role with Britain’s Stop The War Coalition is noted. But nowhere does the institute mention that Tamimi is also high-ranking ideologue for Hamas, one of the deadliest organizations listed under Canada’s anti-terrorism laws….



We like this analysis by Spencer. Spencer is a thousanf times more progressive than all those “lefties” who are backing Islam.


We support everything that Spencer is doing

Continue reading


by Felix Quigley

July 24, 2009

It seems a very long time ago that Robin Cook who was then the British Foreign Secretary refused to make war on Iran to stop it having a Nuclear Bomb and instead said to us that talking would do the job


Now we have an ANTISEMITE as president of the US and for sure he and his team will actually aid Iran in getting a Nuclear Bomb.


Such is the hatred of Obama for Israel and for Jews.

Jihadwatch speaks the truth in this report


Clinton hints that US will accept nuclear Iran

“They won’t be able to intimidate and dominate as they apparently believe they can once they have a nuclear weapon.”

“Clinton stirs Israeli fears US will accept nuclear Iran,” from AFP, July 22 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Wednesday stirred Israeli fears that Washington would accept a nuclear armed Iran when she raised the idea of a US “defence umbrella” for Gulf allies.However, Clinton, during a visit to Thailand for an Asian security conference, said later that she was not announcing a new policy and simply wanted to turn Iran away from pursuing a nuclear weapon.

Clinton told Thai television in Bangkok that President Barack Obama’s administration was still open to engage Iran in talks about its nuclear programme but warned that Tehran would not be safer if it obtains a bomb.

“We will still hold the door open” to talks over its nuclear program Clinton said.

“But we also have made it clear that we will take action, as I’ve said time and time again, crippling action, working to upgrade the defence of our partners in the region,” she said.

Her previous references to “crippling action” have referred to sanctions.

“We want Iran to calculate what I think is a fair assessment: that if the US extends a defence umbrella over the region, if we do even more to support the military capacity of those in the Gulf, it is unlikely Iran will be any stronger or safer,” Clinton said.

“They won’t be able to intimidate and dominate as they apparently believe they can once they have a nuclear weapon.”

In Jerusalem, Israeli Intelligence Services Minister Dan Meridor criticised her remarks.

“I heard without enthusiasm the American declarations according to which the United States will defend their allies in the event that Iran uses nuclear weapons, as if they were already resigned to such a possibility,” he said.

“This is a mistake,” Meridor said. “We cannot act now by assuming that Iran will be able to arm itself with a nuclear weapon, but to prevent such a possibility….”

“I’m not suggesting a new policy. In fact we all believe that Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons is unacceptable, and I’ve said that many times,” she said.

“I’m simply pointing out that Iran needs to understand that it’s pursuit of nuclear weapons will not advance its security or achieve its goals of enhancing its power regionally and globally,” she said.

“The focus that Iran must have is that it faces the prospect — if it pursues nuclear weapons — of sparking an arms race in the region,” she said.

“That should affect a calculation of what Iran intends to do and what it believes is in its national security interest because it may render Iran less secure, not more secure,” she said….


The comments on Jihadwatch are required reading


This is a good one!


The existence of this site increases suspicions that Iran may be building a heavy-water moderated reactor. ISIS has been unable so far to locate such a reactor, completed or under construction. The power reactor under construction at Bushehr does not use heavy water. Iran’s existing research reactors do not use heavy water or too little heavy water to justify a heavy water production facility.

To all those people that excuse Iran’s efforts as ‘innocent and peaceful’ please read the full Institute for Science and International Security report on their site http://www.isis-online dot org and ask yourself HOW the HELL our politicians can fail to see what anyone with a modicum of intelligence can see!?!?!??!

I do NOT want to see a nuclear weapons enabled Iran because our politicians are too chickenshit to act.

Sorry, Israel, the people of the USA are on your side, not so much our government.


Continue reading


Black president demanding segregation in Jerusalem

By Jeff JacobyJeff Jacoby



Late last week, the Obama administration demanded that the Israeli government pull the plug on a planned housing development near the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of Jerusalem. The project, a 20-unit apartment complex, is indisputably legal. The property to be developed — a defunct hotel — was purchased in 1985, and the developer has obtained all the necessary municipal permits.

Why, then, does the administration want the development killed? Because Sheikh Jarrah is in a largely Arab section of Jerusalem, and the developers of the planned apartments are Jews. Think about that for a moment. Six months after Barack Obama became the first black man to move into the previously all-white residential facility at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, he is fighting to prevent integration in Jerusalem.


Jacoby is 100 per cent correct here.


He is totally right to point out that this is a BLACK President who is doing this to Jews. This means that the stories about the contacts between Obama and Sharpton and co are and were absolutely correct.


So the reality is that now in position of President of the US is an ANTISEMITE.


Jacoby does not just spell out the antisemite nature of the action of Obama in stopping Jews from BUILDING IN JERUSALEM


He does something else rather vital.


He visualizes the situation if it was Arabs building on Jewish land in a Jewish sector

It is impossible to imagine the opposite scenario: The administration would never demand that Israel prevent Arabs from moving into a Jewish neighborhood. And the Obama Justice Department would unleash seven kinds of hell on anyone who tried to impose racial, ethnic, or religious redlining in an American city. In the 21st century, segregation is unthinkable — except, it seems, when it comes to housing Jews in Jerusalem



And look at the contrast between ANTISEMITE Obama and the Prime Minister of Israel


Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday. “This has been the policy of all Israeli governments. There is no ban on Arabs buying apartments in the west of the city, and there is no ban on Jews building or buying in the city’s east. This is the policy of an open city.”


The full report can be found on