People did not at all understand what they were voting for in the referenda on the Lisbon Treaty.

This is now coming through with a vengence in the totally iniquitous trial of Geert Wilders in Holland. More on that later but first of all these are the statutes that has got Geert Wilders (and the rest of us that live in Europe) well and truly snookered

These are the statutes from the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Article 52, we should say the notorious Article 52, which goes like this:


1. Any limitation on the exercise of the rights and freedoms recognised by this Charter must be provided for by law and respect the essence of those rights and freedoms. Subject to the principle of proportionality, limitations may be made only if they are necessary and genuinely meet objectives of general interest recognised by the Union or the need to protect the rights and freedoms of others.

2. Rights recognised by this Charter for which provision is made in other Parts of the Constitution shall be exercised under the conditions and within the limits defined by these relevant Parts.

3. Insofar as this Charter contains rights which correspond to rights guaranteed by the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the meaning and scope of those rights shall be the same as those laid down by the said Convention. This provision shall not prevent Union law providing more extensive protection.

4. Insofar as this Charter recognises fundamental rights as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States, those rights shall be interpreted in harmony with those traditions.

5. The provisions of this Charter which contain principles may be implemented by legislative and executive acts taken by Institutions and bodies of the Union, and by acts of Member States when they are implementing Union law, in the exercise of their respective powers. They shall be judicially cognisable only in the interpretation of such acts and in the ruling on their legality.

6. Full account shall be taken of national laws and practices as specified in this Charter.

It is on

There follows legal mumbo jumbo, as if we can not read the above, but we can.

The above statutes, voted on by the Irish and some others, even though it took two goes, and passed without vote by most of the countries of Europe, are what means that Geert Wilders even if he argues his case from now till doomsday, cannot win.

It has already been decided in the above laws

In fact you do not need to go beyond 1 above, in which it says that peoples liberty, for example, the liberty to free speech, can be limited in the following condition:

genuinely meet objectives of general interest recognised by the Union or the need to protect the rights and freedoms of others


In those conditions free speech can be limited.


Now as we shall show and place in an overall context, it does not in the slightest mean if that speech is truthful or not.


This is the entry into the Dark Ages.



The prosecution against Geert Wilders stated that it does not matter whether what Geert says about Islam is true or false. What matters is whether it is “offensive” to Muslims and to Islam

This turns on its head Habeas Corpus, all the fought for basic rights in European countries, especially England from 1640 on, and gets very close to the Hitlerian dictatorship.

The fundamental defence against libel is on whether or not it is true. If what a person says or writes is true then there can be no libel.

This new issue of the Geert Wilders trial (actually not new but more later) is that what Geert says may be true but even so it still may be libellous.

It can be libellous, indeed will be libellous, which fact is due to the existence of the EU law on Human Rights above.

It may be correct, but that no longer matters, it will be termed libellous because the EU law above has stated that it hurts a particular section, or religion, as in the case of Islam

It is interesting and important to understand how did we get here. This has not just happened overnight.

  1. The surrender of national rights to Europe
  2. Article 52 of the European Human Rights Act
  3. The hounding of Enoch Powell out of English politics
  4. The lies against Milosevic until his murder in The Hague (prison)
  5. Following on from Milosevic the astounding judgement against Marxism Today by the English Judge in the ITN Libel Case
  6. The El Dura stitch-up of Israel by the Media
  7. The Qana stitch-up of Israel by the Media
  8. The acceptance of these attacks on their nation by a Jewish traitorous class in Israel itself, and by a traitorous Diaspora
  9. The promotion of the idea (lie) that Stalinism and revisionism is synonymous with revolutionary socialism (Trotskyism)

The above 9 points can be magnified easily into hundreds, but I hope they help to show that we are living in a veritable ocean of lies.

One of the most important conditions for these lies to exist and flourish is the campaign to end nationality and to impose this great bureaucracy of “Europe” upon us.

As is shown in the trial of Geert Wilders this greatly lessens the ability to speak freely which is bound to have a huge effect on education and especially science.

It is the end of bourgeois freedoms and bourgeois science as we have known it, the end of a process of fight for basic democratic rights that has went on from the Middle Ages, which actually surfaced with the Printing Press in Holland (how ironic is that?), which was fought for by Cromwell, carried on by Rousseau, aided greatly by the magnificent American Revolution, then the French etc

All of the above therefore can be seen as a plague of liars with their product, lies, which has swamped all of Europe and most of the world.

We are actually in the “End Times”, the end times of the capitalist system , as an organizational force that can advance humanity and its needs.

But it will not go peacefully. To save itself it will enslave us all.

From capitalism there will be only darkness.

All of this takes place as the world capitalist system plunges deeper into economic crisis and instability and where although taking different forms (Iranian, Hizbullah Syria, Palestinian fascism) the parallels are clear


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s