IN 1949 IT WAS THE ARABS WHO DID NOT TREAT THESE LINES AS BORDERS, BUT AS TEMPORARY ARMISTICE LINES

THE 67 BORDERS…WHAT ARE THEY?

 

(map Jewish Virtual library)

CONCLUSION TO DRAW FROM LOOKING AT THIS MAP:

The above map is most revealing. These are the Armistice Lines of 1949 and the map shows that an Arab advance through the West Bank (Judea and Samaria as it was then called) could cut Israel in two at the obvious weakest link!

The area in this map is less than the size of Munster, which is ONE of Four of the Irish provinces.

(start analysis by Professor Avi Shlaim here)

Avi Shlaim, PhD, Professor of International Relations at St. Antony’s College, Oxford, in his 2001 book Iron Wall, wrote:
“The postwar territorial status quo was established by the armistice agreements that Israel signed with Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan, and Syria in the first half of 1949… Israel and the Arabs interpreted the armistice agreements very differently. Israel maintained that the agreements gave Israel three indisputable rights. The first right was to an absolute cease-fire, which would be binding not only on regular armies but also on irregular forces and civilians. The second was to have the cease-fire lines treated as international borders for all intents and purposes, pending the conclusion of final peace agreements. This meant full sovereignty over Israeli territory, the only limitation being on the introduction of armed forces into the demilitarized zones. The third right was to settle Jews on all the land within its domain and to develop the economy without taking into account the rights of the previous owners who had become refugees.

The Arabs, on the other hand, claimed three rights under the armistice agreements. First, they held that the agreements did not terminate the state of war with Israel and that they were therefore not precluded by international law from denying Israel freedom of navigation, imposing an economic boycott on it, and waging a propaganda campaign against it. Second, they insisted that the armistice lines were only cease-fire lines and not international borders and that Israel was therefore subject to restrictions on its rights to develop the demilitarized zones and to exploit their water resources. Third, they argued that the armistice agreements did not cancel the rights of the displaced Palestinians to return to their lands and that Israel’s use of that land was therefore not legitimate. Moreover, they claimed, the Palestinians were entitled to struggle against the occupation of their land, and the Arab states were under no obligation to curb this struggle.”

 

The differences between the 2 sides are amazing and most interesting.

So these are the 1967 borders that they keep talking about and that Obama in his now infamous bushwhacking speech referred to!

You would think therefore that when the fighting was over, the Arabs defeated as they were, that the Arabs would be happy to treat this deal as their new borders of a state.

But the above analysis shows that it was THEY who did not treat these Armistice Lines as borders, but really as lines, that these lines were certainly temporary, and that the “agreement” was just a stage in their war.

The Jews though were full of hope that these were borders and that the fighting was really over.

To the Arabs they meant nothing, absolutely nothing. Just a stopover point from where they could gather to launch a fresh attack on the Jews and their fragile state.

And that is precisely what ensued in the following years, from 49 to 67, a period of some 18 years. How gullible were those Jews back in 1949 who signed these Armistice Lines into being.

How ironic it is that it is the Arabs today who are calling them “borders”!

More lies within lies!

THE WHOLE OF THE SREBRENICA MASSACRE HOAX WAS BASED ON THE “EVIDENCE” OF A SUPERGRASS

The BBC World Service this morning had Ed Vulliamy on the panel to discuss world affairs but he was really there because of the arrest of Ratco Mladic, and to regurgitate his lies about the conflict.

 

It will come as no surprise that Vulliamy did not deal with the main event since his former reporting.

 

That event was the publication of Civikov’s book.

 

As 4international stated in yesterday’s article the Civikov book focuses in on one key element, that is that the ONLY evidence which showed that there was a “massacre” in Srebrenica is the “evidence” of a supergrass called Drazen Erdymovic

 

A supergrass is a man or woman who has been bought and paid for by the police. The prosecutors in The Hague Kangaroo Court who bought and paid for Erdymovic hence feed the evidence in and one end and this evidence simply comes out the other.

 

In our article on 4international yesterday this in the context of The Hague Kangaroo Court meant:

 

  1. Since Erdymovic did not murder all of those 1200 people on that farm on his own, but had 7 accomplices, plus two higher up in command, then the big question is why all of those murderers have been living such unmolested lives then and now. His accomplices have never been even questioned. This amazed them and it even amazed Erdymovic!
  2. And this is a pattern of course with supergrass trials. The same happened in the trials in Northern Ireland in which the star was Christopher Black. The police only need the one supergrass. Any other intrusion into his evidence would really not only be superfluous to the narrative they are producing, but downright dangerous, for obvious reasons. It is like the mechanics of winding up a puppet, imagine having to repeat that performance with 7 puppets. Can’t be done.

The whole of the Srebrenica narrative stinks to high heaven.

 

That is precisely why the champion sneerer of the western world, Ed Vulliamy, was on the BBC panel this morning. Vulliamy spent the whole programme sneering at the Serbs and asserting that the Serbs who defend Mladic have not “changed”.

 

So what does Ed Vulliamy do with the startling research by Civikov. Easy answer. He hides it.

 

Under no condition can that book of Civikov be referenced in any discussion anywhere.

 

The same tone yesterday was set by the political liars on Harry’s Place website, a website based in London and frequented by many of these paid journalistic hacks like Vulliamy. It headlined its article with “Got the bastard!” The great British legal system of habeas Corpus, innocent until proven guilty, examine all of the evidence carefully, fairly and dispassionately…right out the window.

 

Something else ios going on beyond Bosnia and beyond Srebrenica. What is highlighted by this peculiar behaviour as in Harry’s Place is the political and moral degeneration of a whole layer in society. That is actually the same social strata that followed Hitler in Germany

 

This social layer is out of the English middle class, is hostile to the main forces of the working class on the one hand, and American’s fight to defend the First Amendment on the other.

This is why Obama is their leader and why they are so hateful towards George W. Bush, not because Bush was in an alliance with Islam, which for most of his time in office he was, but because they perceived him as fighting Islam.

 

Of course Ratko Mladic is right on all counts. As his son and lawyer say he needs an independent medical examination, to assess the effects of strokes which he has had.

 

Naturally Ed Vulliamy sneered at this!

 

He is also right as his lawyer says to maintain that he harmed nobody in malice, that all he is guilty of is to defend his own Christian Serbs and other minorities, including a Muslim minority which was in opposition to Izetbegovic and the Jihad. Mladic was engaged in a war which was not of his making or choosing but was the result of the alliance of US and EU Imperialism’s alliance with the Muslim Jihad

 

Mladic is also right to assert through his lawyer that he has no chance of a fair trial in The Hague. It is after all The Hague Kangaroo Court.

 

WITH THE JOINING TOGETHER OF THE PA, HAMAS AND EGYPT AGAINST ISRAEL IT IS NOW OPEN WARFARE

John Bolton has written following the recent Netanyahu Obama battle:

 

The peace agreement between the Hamas terrorists and Fatah, brokered by the post-Mubarak government in Egypt, marks the effective end of any realistic peace process between Israel and the Palestinians for the foreseeable future. 

Obama has not yet grasped this reality, nor does he seem to understand that the Syrian dictatorship and Lebanon’s Hezbollah terrorists remain Iranian pawns, threats both to Israel and to the United States.Accordingly, now is hardly the time to force Israel into unnatural efforts at “peace processing” with the usual suspects. 

Now that Netanyahu has spoken, it is time for Americans and Europeans concerned with true peace and security in the Middle East to carry the debate forward.

 

Bolton is right!

 

The end of the “peace process” is the new reality.

 

This end is highlighted in large letters by the PA and Hamas joining forces, and by the actions of the Egyptian regime in opening the border with the Gaza.

 

This was our main disagreement with the speeches of Netanyahu.

 

The new situation in Egypt is what Netanyahu should have focussed on. But it was precisely here that he pulled back from the necessary open confrontation with Obama.

 

Netanyahu could have pointed to the 84 per cent in the Pew Poll that wanted to have death for apostasy, with immediate effect towards the oppressed minority, the Egyptian Christian Copts. Like the coward he is Netanyahu did not mention the plight of the Copts.

 

Also the result of the Obama approach to Egypt has been this new great danger to Israel. With an open border with Egypt, no need for tunnels, arms simply are driven in.

 

Again Netanyahu pulled back from confronting Obama. Coward Netanyahu!

 

Above all Libya. Here Obama, Cameron and Sarkozy are raining bombs onto Tripoli every single night, and the table tennis partner of Obama, Cameron, snarls that Gadhafi has to go.

 

Netanyahu not a single word about this. Coward Netanyahu!

 

Yet there was a confrontation between Netanyahu and the policies of Obama.

 

The answer to this is not the courage and bravery of Netanyahu, but that Obama and his clique like the Irish woman Samantha Power, are really the equivalent in power of the anti-Semites of the ISM

 

Any small step against that anti-Semitism made by Netanyahu we on 4international, it goes without saying, will support.

 

But rather than losing our heads, it is far better to keep our feet on the ground, and to make a very cool and sober assessment of Netanyahu

 

And how Netanyahu just does not weigh up in what is now open warfare against Israel.

 

It is this open warfare from Obama that the American patriotic people need to see, and be made to see.

 

TADIC SELLS HIS “SOUL” FOR EU MEMBERSHIP…FIRST RECORDED CASE OF RAT JUMPING ONTO SINKING SHIP!

 

For all the good it will do Tadic! And the other flunkeys in his government trying to save their hides by joining the EU, first ever case of a rat jumping ONTO a sinking ship!

I mean Europe has to split up into two tiers, the strong centre around Germany, the weak around Greece, Ireland or Portugal. They badly need 2 currencies. But are so paralysed they can never decide. But instead they stir up hatred.

 

Now also why yesterday would Russia join in with the other Big Seven, making it a Big Eight, and lend its name to the “Gadhafi must go” world brigade, which is made up of Obama downing a pint of Guinness in a god forsaken Irish Pub, somewhere in darkest Ireland, or Cameron and Obama playing tabletennis, imagine, what a ghastly sight, even worse the high fives, an Americanism if ever there was one, or Mrs Cameron showing Mrs Obama HER KITCHEN!!!!

 

What utter bullshit dominates our lives as transmitted through the Media!

 

But Russia joining to bully poor Gadhafi Libya…that will not save Russia either, the opposite.

 

Well is there a connection between all these things, especially the out casting of Mubarak (now threatened with execution) in favour of The Muslim brotherhood, the war on Gadhafi again in favour of the Muslim Brotherhood, the alliance of Obama and the rest with Egypt in alliance with the Protocols promoting Hamas, and this continued hounding of Serbs.

 

I think there is.

 

The promotion of Izetbegovic in Bosnia, and of Thaci in Kosovo, opened up the way for Bin Laden having a necessary stopover on his way from Sudan, and a base leading inexorably to 9.11

 

They all united with Izetbegovic and he was portrayed as a moderate, just as Rauf in New York was promoted by the Mayor of New York also as a moderate, even though he was a Hamas supporter.

 

This is the key. We are fed lies and the central lie today is that Hamas is moderate and must be supported.

 

What unites much in the world today is the fake talk about “democracy” on the one hand, even as Sharia Law is promoted on the other.

 

When we say Sharia Law is promoted we mean in the countries of Europe and America, as well as the Muslim countries.

 

Let us take the latter first. There are over a billion Muslims in Muslim countries. The level of poverty is horrific. In those conditions Islam and Sharia Law was and is the weapon of control and repression. One does not have to dwell on that too much if one is at all conscious, as opposed to brain dead. But it is amazing how many journalists defend Sharia Law.

 

And the former, the effects in the western countries. It is used here to upset and overthrow centuries old traditions, of equality before the law, and even of prevention of cruelty to our fellow creatures in the animal world.

 

But if you try to find out what IS Islam then you will very quickly find yourself debarred from outlets, such as I am from the radio station “Talk Radio Europe” (all very British…they know my number)

 

So the arrest of Mladic is in this new situation. It is not the old situation of the war on Yugoslavia at all, perhaps partly, but the new situation is one of the ascent of The Muslim Brotherhood and the great danger of Obama and Cameron to the world.

 

A situation where Gadhafi is being pummelled and probably eventually eliminated and where the threat of The Hague Kangaroo Court is held over him and all of his family.

 

All based on a lie, that Gadhafi was murdering his own people, even though this leader has offered about a hundred times to sit down and work out an arrangement.

 

In a country where his main opposition has been The Muslim Brotherhood.

 

Back to Bosnia… Karadzic and Mladic were faced by Izetbegovic.

 

Here just remember

 

  1. Izetbegovic had his fingers in the Holocaust, and was an associate of the Nazi Arab from Palestine Hajj Amin el Husseini during The Holocaust. They were both Muslim Brotherhood reps in Bosnia
  2. This whole history of Izetbegovic was kept from the public by the Media
  3. And the Serbs like Mladic and Karadzic were promoted as the New Nazis

So there is a distortion of history concerning Izetbegovic.

 

But why distort history except to sell a new lie.

 

Netanyahu in opposing Obama, and he did, but he never once mentioned any of this.

 

It is as if the war against the Jews as is being conducted by all these forces, the EU, Obama and Power, the Neocons, is being conducted according to Netanyahu in a kind of sealed corner of the human mind.

 

The reality is quite different.

 

The reality is the crisis in the world capitalist system.

 

This is a world where enemies (who are actually friends) are created by the Media.

 

As has happened to Mubarak and now Gadhafi

 

And by this continuation of the war on the Serbs where the Serbs are portrayed as something savage and evil, just like Hitler portrayed the Jews all those years ago, and where the Palestinian Arabs portray the Jews to this day.

 

In this narrative of lies this evil system of capitalism, with its inbuilt lies, has to create the Devil

 

At this point in time this 69 year old man who has been hounded for decades is once more The Devil

 

Just as Netanyahu is portrayed in Europe, and by Obama and Power, as The Devil also…why, because simply he took into consideration the changed situation, that the PA of Abbas has joined Hamas, and that Egypt is now the joint backer of Hamas along with Iran.

 

All of this devil creation by the capitalist system is all very political and is nearly conscious.

 

I agree with Julia Gorin who refers to the Trifkovic article, except that it is a unity, a whole, and the issue of the Serbs and Mladic is now much wider than the Serbs and Kosovo etc.

 

Dr. Trifkovic reminds us that the Hague’s tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia “is a highly politicized institution that has been used over the years to provide retroactive quasi-judicial [justification] of the political position of the Western powers that the Serbs are indeed the main culprits for all that came to pass in the former Yugoslavia.” He adds that the Serbian press today is more government-controlled than it ever was under Slobodan Milosevic, and is consistently pushing EU membership as a panacea for all that ails the country — much like Communism had been, he points out. “If Serbia does join the EU,” he says, “it will be the first time in history that a rat has jumped onto a sinking ship.”

http://www.juliagorin.com/wordpress/

 

 

Lenin wrote on how the tendencies in Imperialism are towards war.

 

They seem to need war. Or is there any explanation for making war on Gadhafi, thus breaking all of the George W. Bush agreements with Gadhafi, and against The Muslim Brotherhood.

 

So the president of Russia just yesterday has sold his soul by joining with the other Seven to call for Gadhafi to go (be killed)

 

But that will not save Russia, rather the opposite.

 

The main drive is to settle the issues of the insoluble nature of the economic crisis.

 

The only logical thing for Europe to do is to scrap the Euro which is unsustainable. But Cameron et al are cowards. Rather than do that they would prefer to make war, say on Libya today, but tomorrow Russia, India or China.

 

I imagine that these poor people like Cameron are all at sea, they go from crisis to crisis, they cannot solve the unemployment, but hey “let’s act the bully and make war on somebody!”

 

Both of those two writers I mention have predicted that when Mladic goes to The Hague that the Media will close down the discussion.

 

I mean there was NO Srebrenica massacre and Cirikov has proved that.

 

But that raises the question as to how the message can truly get out about the reality of life today on this planet.

 

More and more it is becoming clear that we need in the world a party which can do just that.

 

That is for another day. We are beginning a series of 10 articles dealing with history, on our sister site www.wedefendisrael.com and these must be an important focus on creating a new leadership in the world.

THE ONLY CRIME OF MLADIC WAS THAT HE FOUGHT AGAINST JIHAD ON BEHALF OF THE CHRISTIAN SERB PEOPLE

Srebrenica is really at the centre of our political life today. Let me explain.

 

IT WAS ALL A GIANT LIE

The world was taught that the wars in Yugoslavia were unequal. On one side was the Serb Fascist Expansionist aggressor. On the other side were the victims of this aggressor.

 

When it came to the war in Bosnia Herzegovina this was even more pronounced in the Media as it implanted just this Christian aggressor/Muslim victimhood into the consciousness of the general public.

 

So there is an immediate connection right there to the present.

 

The main factors in this link are Obama, Cameron and Sarkozy and their Media machines.

 

They spin the story that:

Mubarak was the cruel dictator amassing huge fortunes and savaging his people.

 

Then with Mubarak forced to resign the attention switched to Muammar Gadhafi and here the cry was raised everywhere that Gadhafi was attacking “his own people” or was “attacking civilians”. It seems that most people will swallow anything they hear on the Media.

 

But this was what was happening in Yugoslavia, and it is very wrong to create a disconnect between the two.

 

What was hidden was that the leadership of the Bosnian Muslims around Izetbegovic was Jihadist Muslim in their political orientation.

 

Just as the main and strongly organized force in the “Arab Spring” is also Jihadist Islam (The Muslim Brotherhood)

 

Something else happened in Bosnia. The Muslims led by Izetbegovic employed the American public relations firm Ruder Finn, and in the United States this Ruder Finn broadcast repeatedly that the Serbs were Nazis and that they were running concentration camps, just like the Nazis did in the Holocaust.

 

This was the precise and admitted job of Ruder Finn, to paint the Serbs and their leaders as Nazis.

 

It was all a lie. There were no concentration camps. It was a civil war and a war of defence by the Christian Serbs against the Izetbegovic Jihad on Christians.

 

IZETBEGOVIC ADMITTED TO KOUCHNER HE WAS A LIAR

Before he died Izetbegovic admitted to the French diplomat Kouchner that the concentration camp propaganda was just that, a propagandist lie

 

The Srebrenica Massacre emerged out of that, was and is the biggest hoax of all.

 

In fact this Srebrenica Massacre was being talked about 2 years before it happened, in 1993, when Izetbegovic emerged out of a meeting with Bill Clinton, to tell his Islamist colleagues from Srebrenica that Clinton wanted a “massacre” staged, in order that the US could intervene with bombing against the Serbs and Serbia.

 

About Srebrenica we on 4international said and say:

 

There is not one item of proof that the Serbs murdered a single Muslim on retaking Srebrenica

 

A CAREFULLY LAID TRAP

It is true though that…The Serbs walked into a carefully laid trap which involved Izetbegovic and the Jihadist leadership removing the main Muslim Squadrons, and thus the surprised Serbs walked straight in without any fight

It was a trap.

 

From there the lies started and continue today and this is the only significance to the arrest by the “Serbs” of this aged and mentally ill former general Ratko Mladic

 

We will turn the tables on the ruling class and on the Ruder Finn pro Jihad liars here.

 

The real tragedy in the situation is that this proud Army Serb leader has been hounded in the latter part of his life and his only and real crime was that he fought against Jihad on behalf of the Serb Christian people.

LESSONS FOR JEWS

The way that this giant hoax of The Srebrenica massacre is of supreme importance for us all to recognize, but especially for Israel and the Jews.

 

The natural allies of the Jews ARE the Serbs because the Serbs and the Jews suffered together in the Nazi Holocaust, and both Serbs and Jews are linked together in recognition of the previous and precedent setting Armenian Massacre by the Turkish government on defenceless Christians. But Jews, especially American Jews, have got to learn the main lesson which is that the power of American Imperialist ideology is great, and that American Jews and their organizations were largely taken in by the ruder Finn propaganda, and this problem is carried into the present, especially over the destruction of Mubarak and Gadhafi, again being replaced by the equivalent of Izetbegovic, The Muslim Brotherhood. It is also to recognize this strategic alliance between capitalist imperialist power and the forces of Islam, essentially the present day Jihad, which we call the Empire Sharia Alliance. It is real.

ERDYMOVIC, WHO WAS ANOTHER CHRISTOPHER BLACK, HOLDS THE SECRET WHICH PROVES THE “SREBRENICA MASSACRE” WAS A GIANT HOAX!

The case of the ICTY Court in the Hague and how it created the giant hoax of “The Srebrenica Massacre”, on the morning after the arrest of Ratko Mladic

 

The whole existence of the ICTY Court (also known as the Hague Kangaroo Court) was based on the “evidence” of one person, who was the equivalent but much worse of Christopher Black of Derry, of supergrass infamy. His name was Drazen Erdymovic.

 

I separate with Harman. I have seen no evidence of any such killing and my big question to Harman is why believe anything that a paid liar like Erdymovic says anyways.

 

My point to Herman is that the police in such cases recruit vulnerable people, who in turn do a deal, and after that they are the property not of the truth but of the police. It is really an old story.

 

But Herman summarises the central issue in Civikov’s book well in these paragraphs below.

 

THE KEY ISSUE IS

Erdymovic in his own story and paid evidence to The Kangaroo Court did not act alone, but in his own words with 7 others.

 

Not only were these 7 others not prosecuted in “such a ghastly crime” as Srebrenica but the ICTY took great care NOT to prosecute them

 

And that is the central clue which if honest people follow it up leads to the reality that the “Srebrenica Massacre” is a giant hoax.

(The central witness in the case which had at its centre the Srebrenica Massacre had 7 associates, with two others further up in the chain of command. They have been and are ignored. Is that not fishy!)

 

But when it comes to Serbs and Jews there are not many honest people around and liars abound.

 

(Start here)

Global Research, January 10, 2011

A review of Germinal Chivikov’s book Srebrenica: The Star Witness (orig. Srebrenica: Der Kronzeuge, 2009, transl. by John Laughland) – “a devastating indictment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY).”

One of the most remarkable and revealing features of the Erdemovic case is that although he named seven individuals who did the killing with him, and two superiors in the chain of command who ordered or failed to stop the crime, not one of these was ever brought into an ICTY court either as an accused killer or to confirm any of Erdemovic’s claims. These co-killers have lived quietly, within easy reach of ICTY jurisdiction, but untroubled by that institution and any demands seemingly imposed by a rule of law. The commander of his unit, Milorad Pelemis, who Erdemovic claimed had given the order to kill, made it clear in an interview published in a Belgrade newspaper in November 2005, that the Hague investigators have never questioned him. He had never gone into hiding, but has lived undisturbed with his wife and children in Belgrade. Nor have ICTY investigators bothered with Brano Gojkovic, a private in the killer team who Erdemovic claimed was somehow in immediate command of the unit (a point never explained by him or prosecutors or judges). Civikov points out that only once did the judges in any of the five trials in which the star witness testified ask the prosecutors whether they were investigating these other killers. The prosecutors assured the judges in 1996 that the others were being investigated, but 14 years later the Office of the Prosecutor had not questioned one of them. And from 1996 onward the judges never came back to the subject.

As these seven were killers of many hundreds in Erdemovic’s version, and the prosecutors and judges took Erdemovic’s version as true, why were these killers left untouched? One thing immediately clear is that the ICTY was not in the business of serving impartial justice even to the point of arresting and trying wholesale killers of Bosnian Muslims in a case the ICTY itself called “genocide.” But ignoring the co-perpetrators in this case strongly suggests that the prosecutors and judges were engaged in a political project—protecting a witness who would say what the ICTY wanted said, and refusing to allow any contesting evidence or cross-examination that would discredit the star witness. Civikov points out that the only time Erdemovic was subject to serious cross-examination was when he was questioned by Milosevic himself during the marathon Milosevic trial. And Civikov shows well that the ICTY presiding judge in that case, Richard May, went to great pains to stop Milosevic whenever his questions penetrated too deeply into the area of Erdemovic’s connections or credibility.

In April 2004, a Bosnian Croat, Marko Boskic, was arrested in Peabody, Massachusetts, for having caused a hit-and-run car crash while drunk. It was soon discovered that Boskic was one of the members of Erdemovic’s killer team at Branjevo Farm But journalists at the ICTY soon discovered that the Tribunal did not intend to ask for the extradition of this accused and confessed murderer. A spokesman for the Office of the Prosecutor stated on August 2004 that the prosecutor was not applying for the extradition of Boskic because it was obligated to concentrate on “the big fish.” So killing hundreds, and being part of a “joint criminal enterprise” murdering 1,200, does not yield big enough fish for the ICTY. In fact, this is a major lie as dozens of cases have been brought against Serbs for small-scale killings or even just beatings, and the ICTY has thrived on little fish for many years. In fact, the first case ever brought by the ICTY was against one Dusko Tadic in 1996, who was charged with a dozen killings, all dismissed for lack of evidence, leaving him guilty of no killings whatsoever, but only of persecution and beatings, for which he was given a 20 year sentence. A number of other Serbs were given prison sentences, not for killing people, but for beatings or passivity in not exercising authority to constrain underlings (e.g., Dragolic Prcac, 5 years; Milojica Kos, 6 years, Mlado Radic, 20 years, among others). The dossier of ICTY prosecution of little (Serb) fish is large.

Thus, the Boskic case does not fall into any little-fish-disinterest category. Rather, it is perfectly consistent with the failure to bring to court Pelermis or any of the seven known co-perpetrators of the massacre. Civikov’s very plausible hypothesis is that this is another manifestation of star witness protection—the ICTY does not want his convenient testimony to be challenged. Little fish like Boskic might gum up a political project. Civikov contrasts the extremely alert and aggressive actions of the ICTY and U.S. authorities in getting Erdemovic transferred to the Hague in March 1996 with this remarkable reluctance to even question Erdemovic’s fellow killers. He was seen quickly as a man who might make proper connections to enemy targets, so no holds were barred then, or later..

http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=22727

TIME WILL TELL…THE PERFORMANCE OF NETANYAHU WAS A DISASTER FOR ISRAEL AND WILL END UP WITH A MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD AL QAIDA STATE ON ISRAEL’S BORDERS

Netanyahu addressed Congress yesterday and got over 50 standing ovations, but he forgot one thing: This was the leadership of American Imperialism that he was addressing and the key sentence in the speech of Netanyahu was when he referred to the coming to power of The Muslim Brotherhood in all countries, thanks to both the Democrats AND Republicans. In other words two sets of people, very important peoples, AMERICANS AND ISRAELIS, are being led into the jaws of death by these leaders, Netanyahu and the Israeli elite, the Democrats under Obama and Clinton, and the Republicans who, and this is the key issue, are fundamentally no different.

That key sentence from Netanyahu:

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu spoke of ”about the great convulsion taking place in the Middle East” in his opening remarks and said that the “ground is still shifting” and that the uprisings in the Muslim countries represent people’s demands for liberty — but like 1979 Iran, the outcomes were in question.

This is the Big Lie that is peddled and that Netanyahu in his speech to Congress joined in with.

The Uprisings in the Middle East are not about democracy, but liberty, and here we mean the liberty to have ONE ELECTION ONE TIME

 

This is the peculiar form of Liberty that the Muslim Brotherhood is seeking in every one of these countries.

IN HIS SPEECH TO CONGRESS NETANYAHU UTTERED NOT ONE WORD ABOUT LIBYA WHICH IS PRESENTLYH BEING BOMBED NIGHTLY BY NATO. THIS REPRESENTS THE TOTAL BETRAYAL OF THE JEWS BY THIS LEADER (FAUX  LEADER)

Not a word from Netanyahu about Libya where NATO, the worst enemies of the Jews in Obama and the EU (Cameron and SARKOZY), HAS NOW BEEN BOMBING TRIPOLI HEAVILY IN THE LAST 2 NIGHTS
In fact Netanyahu making a big deal out of Israel being loyal to the US made it very clear where he stands. he stands with NATO, always with NATO. Has he been bought earlier in life.

This “prophet” Netanyahu leads the Jews into the jaws of death and I can smell the flesh burning from here.

When Netanyahu speaks this is not the proud Jewish people who returned from Babylon equipped with their Bible and capable national self consciousness. He is projecting Jews and Israel as being the dhimmis of America

Meanwhile the ONLY strategy which American Jewish groups can produce is to pin everything on the replacement of Obama by a Republican. But that does not break the “dhimmi of America” mentality.

There is NO middle road here and the main problem is that Israel does not have a human being who can articulate the need.

This is to

1. Bring the San Remo Conference of 1920 into play in all discussions

2. Bring into play also the criminality of Britain and Churchill and direct this specially to Cameron that Britain robbed the Jews in the following months (leading to the Cairo Conference of 1920) of 80 per cent of their promised Homeland

3. That these “Palestinians” are a fake, the product of the machinations of Britain and America, and of their promotion of Holocaust organizer Hajj Amin el Husseini. Not only “Palestinians” but “Palestinian Arabs” is a rubbish term.

THE RACISM INHERENT IN THIS US AND EU CONSCIOUSNESS WHICH NETANYAHU ASKS JEWS TO JOIN WITH

The danger is not at all just Obama. The danger is this American and EU consciousness, where they look on Libya and could care less about past and solemn agreements, such as that made by George W. Bush with Muammar Gadhafi. An agreement with Gadhafi what nonsence we are the great Americans!

And the big danger is these “republicans” who see the agreement with Gadhafi made by Bush as being just an agreement with a “native”, of no real consequence.

TO THEM NETANYAHU IS A HERO BUT NETANYAHU IS PREPARING TO SURRENDER BYU FORCE JEWISH HISTORICAL LAND WHICH IS RIGHTFULLY THEIRS

And at this moment in time as far as these same people are concerned Netanyahu can do no wrong

The only problem with this is that the Democrats AND republicans have wrought havoc in the Middle East. Mubarak who is threatened now with execution BY THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, AND NOW LIBYA AND GADHAFI, PROVES THAT THEY CANNOT BE TRUSTED FOR A SECOND

How Mubarak must now rue trusting America. How Gadhafi must regret not acquiring those Nuclear arms.

But Israel is treading the same path.
EVERYTHING about Netanyahu to me stinks.

WHAT CAROLINE GLICK SAYS ON THIS AND WHERE THAT LEAVES US

The main point that Glick makes is that Obama created a diversion. She is certainly right.

By far the biggest event and issue centres on Hamas specifically and on the agreement which Abbas has made with Hamas. The differences between the two remain, it is purely opportunistic and episodic…remember that, it is most important.

The great Netanyahu policy rests on from (the pupils of Nazi Hajj Amin el Husseini) Hamas and Fatah, a mere form of words, and hey presto Muslim Brotherhood sit on the flank of Israel equipped with an army paid for and trained by American and EU antisemitism.

America under both Republican and Democratic Governments have built up the army of Abbas and that is going to be taken over, post September election, by the Hamas. The Muslim Brotherhood proceeds apace in every country thanks due to US Imperialism. The alliance as crisis engulfs capitalism is certainly formal though hidden and strategic.

Hamas is based upon the Protocols of Zion and is pure antisemitism. So that is what the Obama policy has achieved and which is largely hidden by the Republicans, because they in Bush and Rice were responsible initially for just that policy. Before that Clinton, Carter, Bush Snr. and Reagan…you see it is an unbroken seam.

Glick is right. Obama created a diversion from this reality, the 49 Armistice Borders, which he calls the 67 Borders, another Big Lie right there!

By cheering Netanyahu’s speechifying to the rafters Jewish blogs in America play into this deception.

The relevant Caroline Glick paragraphs are here:

Obama had two options for contending with the Palestinian unity deal. He could pay attention to it or he could create a distraction in order to ignore it. If he paid attention to it, he would have been forced to disavow his policy of blaming his predecessors in the White House and Israel for the absence of peace. By creating a distraction he would be able to change the subject in a manner that would enable him to maintain those policies.
 
And so he picked a fight with Netanyahu. And by picking the fight, he created a distraction that has, in fact, changed the subject and enabled Obama to maintain his policies that have been wholly repudiated by the reality of the Palestinian unity deal.
 
By inserting the citation of the 1949 armistice lines into his speech, Obama made Israel’s size again the issue.
 
The Hamas-Fatah unity deal actually demonstrates that not only is Israel’s size not the cause of the conflict, it is the main reason that Israelis and Palestinians live in relative peace.
 
Israel’s control over Judea and Samaria and east Jerusalem, and with them, its ability to ward off invasion and attacks on its major cities is what has prevented wars. If Israel were more vulnerable, the de facto Palestinian terror state would not be weighing whether or not to begin a new terror war as its leaders from Fatah and Hamas are doing today. It would be waging a continuous campaign of terror whose clear aim is Israel’s destruction for again, as Netanyahu said the 1949 armistice lines make war an attractive option for Israel’s enemies.
 
BY PICKING a fight with Netanyahu, since Thursday, no one could have possibly noted this basic truth because the false issue of Israel’s control over these areas – that is, Israel’s size – has dominated the global discourse on the Middle East.
 
 
After that Glick makes other useful points, but after making these vital remarks, shows the limitations of present bourgeois Jewish leadership in ending like this:
 
 

Netanyahu deserves a lot of credit for standing up to Obama on Friday. He showed enormous courage in doing so. It was his finest hour to date and polls over the weekend show that the public appreciates and supports him for it. He must build on that success by putting the focus on the truth.

 
It was NOT a success.
 
Netanyahu missed the essence which is that Obama speaks to a very specific audience, and since he is out of the Khalidi cum Edward Said school it is the audience of American and European antisemitism.
 
Israel expansionist? You must be jokkng! israel is less than the size of Munster which is about one quarter of tiny Ireland, a mere province for goodness sake.
 
That is what Obama and the antisemites want to attack and to reduce further. How hard is it to make that case against THAT!
 
Netanyahu did not stand up to Obama at all. That is a mirage. He seemed to but that is only to very stupid people.
 
As Yamit82 on Israpundit has pointed out in opposition to editor Ted belman that will still mean stripping 100,000 Jews from their home in Judea.
 
As we have often stated Jewish leadership is in a gigantic crisis and this will only be resolved through the quest for new leadership.
 
Our sister website www.wedefendisrael.com is pioneering a series of articles on history which incorporates many lessons and will be a focus of important lessons being learned
 
The way forward can be found but it will not be found easily.