The forces in America and Europe who are opposed to that Alliance of Capitalism and Jihad were planning to hold a conference in France in July, but the French authorities have banned it.

The method of the banning follows a common tactic by Nazi forces historically and internationally. Nazi forces have always mobilised to prevent demonstrations and meetings by threatening, and indeed using, violence.

The Nazi forces in this case are groups in Europe who are calling themselves “Left” and are being referred to as “leftists”

If Libertarians like Pamela Geller, Geert Wilders, Robert Spencer, or anybody attempt a public meeting or demonstration the provocation from the Fascists is put in place and hey presto, the capitalist state has the excuse to stop the discussion in its tracks

There is not the slightest doubt that these “leftist” groups are now highly infiltrated by the state intelligence service. In this regard remember that Provisional Sinn Fein became so heavily infiltrated that British Intelligence at the end called all the shots (no pun intended)

However, remember that the libertarian tendency has got deep historical roots inside of America. These positions are not going to be so easily surrendered by fighters like Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer.

4international applauds the decision to fight back against French and British cowardly censorship by launching a special boat to sail out of New York Harbour just after the 9.11 Tenth Anniversary, and especially the decision to call into Egypt to state its solidarity with the oppressed Coptic Christians of Egypt.

This will of course pose major security issues but this is a very strong libertarian tradition and it will find a way.

Meanwhile 4international is still awaiting an answer from the Jewish owned radio station in Spain, Talk Radio Europe. We have asked the owner Martin Nathan, who is Jewish, to source for us the dastardly attacks made on his station over the airways against Israel and Jews. 24 hours have passed. Surely time to reply to our email.



These are details of the planned assistance to the Coptic Christians of Egypt:


Democracy collapses in Europe: EU cancels SIOA/SIOE free speech rally
Freedom from jihad flotilla to launch on 9/11


Democracy collapses in Europe: EU cancels SIOA/SIOE free speech rally — Freedom from jihad flotilla to launch on 9/11 Reuters

STRASBOURG, FRANCE, June 28: In a capitulation to Islamic supremacists and violent radical Leftists, French and European Union authorities have canceled a free speech rally planned by a coalition of American and European human rights organizations in Strasbourg, the seat of the European Parliament.The human rights organizations Stop Islamization of America (SIOA) and Stop Islamisation of Europe (SIOE) were planning to hold their first-ever transatlantic summit in Strasbourg, France, on July 2.

The SIOA/SIOE summit was dedicated to the defense of the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, and the equality of rights of all people before the law – all principles denied by Islamic law.

SIOA Executive Director Pamela Geller said in a statement: “The Strasbourg police could not guarantee our safety. When the thugs of the Antifa group and Islamic supremacist organizations announced plans to hold a violent counter-demonstration and to do everything they could to disrupt our activities, the authorities canceled permission for our demonstration and conference, instead of standing up to these violent neo-fascists and their Islamic supremacist allies.”

Strasbourg authorities told SIOA and SIOE organizers that they could not guaranteee their safety at the conference and demonstration location, the Place de la Republique. Efforts were made to hold the demonstration nearby, but the authorities still considered security to be too much of an issue.

Muslims and Leftist fascists previously burned down a hotel in Strasbourg during a NATO summit, and burned a large number of cars in a car park during riots in the same city.

SIOA and SIOE are not intimidated, and will demonstrate in the future, just as we did in Harrow, Copenhagen and Aalborg. This planned Strasbourg demonstration and conference will be rescheduled.

Geller added: “Once again democracy is being denied in Europe. But we are not giving in. On the contrary: when our governing authorities are refusing to protect freedom, we have to do it ourselves. That’s the impetus for our Freedom From Jihad Flotilla.”

“The SIOA/SIOE Freedom From Jihad aid flotilla,” Geller explained, “is intended to be a direct response to the capitulation of French, European, and American authorities to Leftist and Islamic supremacist forces of oppression and injustice. It is set to launch after our national Rally for Freedom at Ground Zero on the tenth anniversary of the Islamic jihad attacks that murdered three thousand Americans.”

The Audacity of the Infidel will launch on September 11 from the New York harbor closest to the World Trade Center site. On board will be freedom fighters from all over the world, united in defense of human rights and human dignity against Islamic supremacist oppression.

The mission is the first attempt by free citizens anywhere in the world to come to the aid of non-Muslims persecuted for their faith in Muslim countries. It is a direct response to the heavily-armed Leftist/jihadist flotilla that attempted to violate Israel’s legal maritime blockade of Hamas-ruled Gaza on May 31, 2010. In that incident, Turkish jihadists onboard one ship attacked Israeli soldiers without provocation; nine jihadists were killed in the battle. The Freedom From Jihad Flotilla is also a response to the Audacity of Hope flotilla that is soon to set sail to continue the jihad against Israel, with plans to use chemical weapons against Israeli forces.

The Freedom From Jihad Flotilla will offer aid to persecuted Christians, Hindus, and other non-Muslims, and call upon the international community to recognize Muslim persecution of non-Muslims as a violation of international law, to be punished with strict economic sanctions and other appropriate action.

The first stop will be Greece, in recognition of the Greek victims of jihad in Anatolia for well over a thousand years. The Freedom From Jihad Flotilla will then sail along the Turkish coast, where speakers will pay homage to the millions of victims of the Armenian and Greek genocides in Turkey.

The next stop will be Egypt. All Coptic Christians seeking to escape Islamic oppression will be saved. Subsequent stops will include Nigeria, Pakistan, Indonesia, and other areas where Christians are facing persecution from Muslims. The freedom flotilla will also include stops in Bangladesh, for Hindus facing Muslim persecution, and Thailand, for Buddhists facing the same persecution.

SIOA is the foremost organization in America dedicated to defending human rights, religious liberty, and the freedom of speech against Islamic supremacist intimidation and attempts to bring elements of Sharia to the West.

The SIOA Freedom From Jihad Flotilla will call upon the international community to act in defense of these basic human rights:

  • The freedom of speech – as opposed to Islamic prohibitions of “blasphemy” and “slander,” which are used effectively to quash honest discussion of jihad and Islamic supremacism;
  • The freedom of conscience – as opposed to the Islamic death penalty for apostasy;
  • The equality of rights of all people before the law – as opposed to Sharia’s institutionalized discrimination against women and non-Muslims.

 The Flotilla will call upon all free people of all races and creeds to stand with us to defend our freedoms against the radically intolerant ideology codified in Islamic law.

We had intended to announce the Freedom from Jihad Flotilla at our first SIOA/SIOE transatlantic pro-freedom conference but for the forces of evil.



 Brutal beheadingWorld News

AFGHANISTAN | Afghan terror advances ahead of President Obama’s pullout plan | Mindy Belz


Screen capture from video


Afghans are warning of dire consequences for the country’s tiny Christian population should American forces leave Afghanistan, as President Barack Obama prepares to announce his plans for a troop drawdown in a televised address to the nation scheduled for Wednesday evening.

“If U.S. troops are not in Afghanistan the Taliban will come to power,” said Obaid S. Christ, an Afghan Christian exiled to India who spoke to me Tuesday. “We will have the same situation we had in the 1990s when the Russians left Afghanistan, when we had civil war and millions killed.”

…But a more recent, gruesome incident makes clear that the danger for anyone turning from Islam in Afghanistan is not over. A video released in recent weeks, and made available to WORLD this week by two separate Afghan sources, shows four Afghan militants beheading a man believed to be a Christian in Herat Province.

The militants, who claim to be Taliban, captured the victim, a man in his 40s named Abdul Latif (according to Obaid Christ, who provided translation of the video), earlier this year from his village outside Enjeel, a town south of Herat.



In the two-minute video, the men, wearing explosive belts (or suicide vests) and kaffiya head scarves to cover their faces, recite verses from the Quran while forcing Latif to the ground and pinning him with their feet. “You who are joined with pagans . . . your sentence [is] to be beheaded,” read one of the militants in Farsi from what looked like a paper decree. “Whoever changes his religion should be executed.” The passages refer to Sura 8:12 (“I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks . . .”) and the hadiths, or sayings of Mohammed.



As Latif fought his captors from the ground, one of the militants thrust a medium-sized blade into the side of his neck. With blood flowing onto the ground the militants shouted “Allahu Akhbar” or “God is great” over and over until Latif was fully beheaded and his head was placed on top of his chest.

The brutal killing followed a now-too-familiar pattern used in other beheadings captured on video, notably the killings of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in Pakistan in 2002 and U.S. defense contractor Nick Berg in Iraq in 2004. It also likely coincided with a Taliban-incited mob attack on the UN compound in Mazar-e-Sharif in April that followed the March burning of Qurans in the United States by pastor Terry Jones’ church in Florida. After that incident an estimated 4,000 Afghans poured into the streets of Mazar and marched on the compound, killing 10 UN officials—and reportedly beheading two of them. That was followed by a May attack by the Taliban on the Provincial Reconstruction Team headquarters in Herat (at the time under Italian control), where they killed four and injured more than 38. Both cities until then were considered among



This is a great campaign. this campaign is NOPT linked to CAIR, and is thereby not linked to supporting Hamas

We support it fully.

Great pictures from Atlas Shrugs

St Nicholas Church Rally at Ground Zero
Rebuild the 95-Year-Old Church, Stop the Ground Zero Mosquestrosity

Apparently, Islamic Supremacism trumps Christianity at Ground Zero

While Mayor Bloomberg wets himself in anxious haste to build the cultural obscenity, the Ground Zero mosque, the iconic St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church, built in 1916 and destroyed by the destruction of the World Trade towers by Muslim terrorists, remains vanquished, unable to rebuild. Bloomberg is lobbying for 911 taxpayer funds for the Islamic supremacist grifters behind the Ground Zero mosque, but the St. Nicholas church is in purgatory, ten years after the worst day in modern American history.

Perhaps St. Nicholas should claim they are a mosque. Mayor Gloomberg and NYC Council speaker Quinn would probably pour the cement for its foundation (Bloomberg worked behind the scenes to get Ground Zero Mosque approved).

St. Nicholas Church is suing the Port Authority, claiming that agency is blocking church’s reconstruction (NY Daily News)

A notice of claim was filed on behalf of St. Nicholas Church and the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, declaring their intention to sue.”This claim arises out of the arrogance, bad faith and fraudulent conduct of the Port Authority in preventing St. Nicholas from re-building its church at Ground Zero,” the church says in its legal filings.

Why not tie up the Ground Zero mega mosque in this red tape morass?

Book September 11th we will be holding our second annual freedom rally for our war dead and to protest the 15-story mega mosque going up on Ground Zero. Be there. Join us on the tenth anniversary of that bloody, brutal day when jihad came to America.

The stealth jihadists behind the Ground Zero mosquestrosity launched a public fund-raising drive yesterday in a bid to open its doors to the public with an art exhibit that would debut just 10 days after the Sept. 11 anniversary:

The group plans to open the three-month exhibit on Sept. 21, which the United Nations has declared the International Day of Peace. The exhibit would feature portraits of the city’s immigrant kids representing at least 171 different countries.

“NYChildren Exhibit: Let’s open Park51’s doors to the World!” the fund-raising solicitation says. By early last night, Park51 had raised $867 from 14 donors, according to Kickstarter.

“While our critics know us as the Ground Zero Mosque, we are the Park51 Community Center,” Park51 says in the appeal. “This exhibition is about finding the courage to meet and get to know neighbors to build trust and friendship.”

96-Year-Old St. Nicholas Church at Ground Zero Sues for Right to Rebuild While Bloomberg lobbies for 911 Taxpayer Dollars for Ground Zero Mosque Supremacists 

St Nicholas Church Rally at Ground Zero (6-26-11) by Pamela Hall


TEN YEARS AFTER 9-11 they are still asking, “How long must St. Nicholas WAIT to Rebuild?” Continue reading


Why are Jews at the ‘Holocaust denial’ conference?
The Magazine answers…

Members of Neturei Karta

Orthodox Jews at the controversial Tehran debate

Why are Jews attending a conference on the Holocaust in Tehran at which star guests include deniers of the genocide? Clue: they also want an end to the Israeli state.


A handful of Orthodox Jews have attended Iran’s controversial conference questioning the Nazi genocide of the Jews – not because they deny the Holocaust but because they object to using it as justification for the existence of Israel.With their distinctive hats, beards and side locks, these men may, to the untrained eye, look like any other Orthodox believers in Jerusalem or New York. But the Jews who went to Tehran are different.

Some of them belong to Neturei Karta (Guardians of the City), a Hasidic sect of a few thousand people which views Zionism – the movement to establish a Jewish national home or state in what was Palestine – as a “poison” threatening “true Jews”.

But how do Neturei Karta and other Orthodox Jews such as Austria-based Rabbi Moishe Ayre Friedman justify attending such a controversial conference?

Rabbi Friedman told BBC Radio 4’s PM programme that he was not in Tehran to debate whether the Holocaust happened or not, but to look at its lessons.

He says the Holocaust was being used to legitimise the suffering of other peoples and he wanted to break what he called a taboo on discussing it.

The main thing, he argued, was not Jewish suffering in the past but the use of the Holocaust as a “tool of commercial, military and media power”.

In what many other Jews would consider the height of naivety, he commended Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for wanting “a secured future for innocent Jewish people in Europe and elsewhere”.

In his speech to the conference, Neturei Karta’s Rabbi Cohen said there was no doubt about the Holocaust and it would be “a terrible affront to the memory of those who perished to belittle the guilt of the crime in any way”.

However, he also argued that the genocide had been divine will. “The Zionists, with their secular pompous approach behave in complete opposition to this philosophy and dare to say ‘Never Again’.

“They have the audacity to think that they can prevent the Almighty from repeating a Holocaust. This is heresy.”

Neturei Karta’s views are regarded with abhorrence by most other Orthodox Jews, according to Rabbi Jeremy Rosen of the Yakar centre in London.

(I would say by all Jews, orthodox or not…FQ)

“And I think, frankly, even among the Hasidic world, by and large Neturei Karta are regarded as freaks,” the Orthodox rabbi told the BBC News website.

The above from BBC reporting on http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6171503.stm raises huge issues


There are a number of things about this Naturei Karta to make clear:

1. They represent only a few thousands of Jews

2. They are allowed freedom, total, to put forward their views.

3. They are useful for us to keep in mind, because they raise the issue of Jews and the land of Judea, a real place, Jews and the need for a physical Homeland, Jews and the need for a place of respite from antisemitism

4. The Holocaust by the Nazis

They echo a theme put forward by Mr Richie Allen to Jack Engelbard last night, that Israelis (Jews) should forget about their history, just deal with the present, and get on with settling the issue

(Yes he said that, I have the tape)

In his confused and confusing mind Mr Allen also said to Engelbard that look…the republicans and Loyalists in Northern Ireland sat down and settled. Why not you JEWS also Mr Allen implied. KIND OF SCOLDED ACTUALLY!


The most obvious answer to give to Mr Allen on this is that the Provisional IRA were never Muslim Jihadists.

Also they were never driven by the religion of Islam.

That is a big difference right there which Mr Allen does not allow to enter his thought processes.

Mr Allen is a mechanical thinker. He is unfortunately not a dialectician.

Jack Engelhard also patiently explained to Allen that the Arab Muslims want to set up a Palestine State which is Judenfrei. NO JEW WILL BE ALLOWED TO LIVE IN THIS “PALESTINE”.

That is another major difference between settling the Middle East and settling the Irish issue.

The origins of Republicanism in the United Irishmen, based on the ideas of the outstanding and very progressive American and French Revolutions, was for Protestant and Catholic UNITING

Not for living in the equivalent of Judenfrei states.




The republican struggle was based not always in practice true, but in its essentials, on the principles of the French Revolution, that is the Enlightenment

The Muslim “Palestinian” Arab struggle is based on Islam



This group basically says forget about the Holocaust of the Jews.

But the Holocaust of the Jews in the Nazi era did not create the Jewish people. The Jewish people existed 4000 years before the Holocaust.

But the Holocaust is part of Jewish History. Never again means to take all possible measures which would prevent a situation arriving where Jews are powerless.


Where Jews are given the one alternative, therefore no alternative…GET ON THOSE TRAINS NOW!

You can as much separate the Jews of today from the Nazi Holocaust, as you can separate the Irish of today from the executions of the 1916 rebel leaders.

It is impossible.

But the biggest question is WHY ASK!!!

Why ask Jews to forget their past as did Mr Allen to Jack Engelhard last night (on Talk Radio Europe) and get on with it. Is that not the most horrific thing possible to say to a Jew today!

How insulted poor Mr Engelhard must have felt by Allen!




Jack Engelhard, speaking on the radio station Talk Radio Europe to Richard Allen, maintained last night that the context of the discussion on Israel in Europe is antisemitism

Richard Allen tried to corner Jack Engelhard with something like “But are you saying that our callers are antisemitic!!!”

Engelhard was having none of this, from a radio station which is notorious in its use of the reactionary European Libel laws, (NO FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF FREE SPEECH HERE!)

Mr Engelhard correctly replied to this approach by broadcaster Allen

Along the lines of…Certainly not. The callers are not antisemitic but the overall context of the discussion on Israel in Europe is antisemitic.

To use a current expression, since this is the week of Wimbleton:

Mr Richard Allen is blasted right out of court. Game set and match to Mr Jack Engelhard!

Now, now, Mr Richard Allen, (Richie to his friends and since Mr Allen slammed down the phone on me and 4international I am not) no more of your crude provocations against seasoned American jewish fighters like Jack Engelhard pleeze!

Jack Engelhard had given us all in Europe a classic lesson in how to conduct the fight on behalf of Israel. We do not need to call anybody an antisemite. That is actionable and people like George Galloway have made much money on that basis.


But insist that the overall context of the discussion on Israel in Europe IS antisemitism


Thank you Mr Jack Engelhard for that lesson


This was a horrific programme to cast out over the airways of Europe.

I on behalf of www.4international.com and also of www.wedefendisrael.com have this morning sent these emails, one to the Jewish owner of this radio station, talk Radio Europe, and the second to Richard Allen

The emails concern claims made against Israel by a caller naming himself “Gary”. I need to know his second name. I need to have Gary source his claims against Israel. I need to have Richard Allen contact this “Gary” to have him substantiate his sources for these injurious against Israel claims. I need to have Jewish owner Nathan Thomas answer to his responsibilities.

These are the emails:

To Mr Richard Allen


Reference to your programme last night (27 june 2011)


What is the second name of your caller “Gary”?


This is important to know because this man made claims which are very detrimental to Israel, and therefore to the Jewish people.


He used two historical claims to show how bad Israel was.


  1. 1.     (Fact 1) Sabra and Shatilla. He claimed Sharon and Israel were behind this
  2. 2.     (Fact 2) He claimed that the IDF in 1967 took all of the “Palestinians” out of the Egyptian Army and murdered them

You Richard Allen did not contest these “facts”


So Mr Allen please kindly inform me why you did not ask that these claims be sourced.


Why did you allow these horrible claims to stand without asking the caller to source his claims?


If these claims are allowed to stand, and not be contested by you, do you not consider that this falls into the ambit of “propaganda against Israel”?


I on behalf of 4international am also writing to the Jewish owner of this radio station and asked for the sources of these claims broadcast last night.





To Mr Martin Nathan


Reference to your station’s programme last night (27 june 2011) on the Jack Engelhard interview


What is the second name of your caller “Gary”?


This is important to know because this man made claims which are very detrimental to Israel, and therefore to the Jewish people.


He used two historical claims to show how bad Israel was.


(Fact 1) Sabra and Shatila Massacre. He claimed Sharon and Israel were behind this

(Fact 2) He claimed that the IDF in 1967 took all of the “Palestinians” out of the Egyptian Army and murdered them

Richard Allen did not contest these “facts”


I have written to Mr Allen thus:


“Mr Allen please kindly inform me why you did not ask that these claims be sourced.


Why did you allow these horrible claims to stand without asking the caller to source his claims?”


If these claims are allowed to stand, and not be contested by you Mr Nathan as owner of the radio station itself, do you not consider that this falls into the area of “propaganda against Israel”?








I make an appeal to all who read this and all who have been in contact with 4international over the last years to help to build a strong Trotskyist movement which can lead the working class


Immediately we must fight to defend:


1. The Jews, who are coming under severe attack from the Flotilla of Hate, from the Media which is embedded on the Flotilla of hate, from the savages of Fatah now in alliance with Hamas, from all who deny the nature of these antisemitic enemies of Israel


2. Muammar Gadhafi and his political tendency who alone IN LIBYA are fighting against this horrific alliance of the western elites and Sharia. Please DO NOT BE EQUIVOCAL in this battle between Gadhafi and Sharia. Side with Gadhafi. There is no room on the fence. Call for VICTORY TO GADHAFI over Cameron, Obama, Sarkozy, and the MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD. Only Muammar Gadhafi in Libya is fighting those evil forces. BE PRINCIPLED NOW AND CALL FOR VICTORY TO GADHAFI!


3. Defend Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, Geert Wilders and others in Europe, in a principled defence which is in actual fact against precisely the same forces which the Gadhafi political tendency is fighting for survival against in Libya




Trotskyism, as represented by Lenin and Trotsky, has a proud history.


It is just that this history has gotten itself submerged but it is nevertheless real and true.


the change that is urgently needed calls for initiative

This can only be done if people come forward and join with 4international in helping to find the way forward. Please do it! Get in contact if you read this.


The crisis is making everything so clear.


Turn to this wonderful and principled site



On that site you will see some of the most horrific images that have ever existed, images from these Libyan enemies of Gadhafi, such as a young boy of about perhaps 10 or 11 being sodomised by the barrel of a rifle type gun


This is almost unbelievable


But unfortunately this is the reality of the world as it exists today…Especially my Serbian friends, as well as Jewish friends, must take decisive action!


But I have witnessed how human beings treat animals here in Europe, I have carried an article on Sharia cruelty to animals in Indonesia, and what humans do to animals they are well capable of doing to fellow humans.


As the Holocaust taught there is no depths that humanity cannot go to.





At this particular conjuncture of the economic and political crisis of capitalism everything in political life is becoming ever clearer as group faces off against group.



The great Israeli writer Caroline Glick has just been telling the world about the conduct of American Jewish elites who have met and after listening to more from Obama have donated HUGE sums to this Charlatan and enemy of the Jews and Israel. Thus these Jews in question lay down clear markers as to what their real role is and will be. Caroline has wisely asked what drives such Jews to vote Democrat and Obama of all Democrats when there are such great friends of Israel such as Michelle Bachman and Sarah Palin, as well as John Bolton. This remains a central puzzle and question because Caroline only partially answered it.


Libya is another dividing line issue. From the very first hours of this situation 4international did not just call to defend Gadhafi, we said clearly that Gadhafi must defeat the alliance of NATO and Muslim Brotherhood. This was the dividing line right there and we stood alone. But still to oppose the war in general is also better than supporting NATO. Yet not enough as our piece above shows






PS As Pamela Geller warned the videos were immediately blocked from the public. But the site above shows that there are great and principled people living in this world, and these people know the score about our horrible reality, and saved the videos. The videos are safe.


It is impossible to say what will be the outcome of the NATO war on the forces of Gadhafi. What is clear, however, is the role of NATO in the world today, as it bombs a small country with little resources.


Kosovo did not have oil, nor did Serbia. So those who claim that the war on Gadhafi is to gain control of oil resources are well off the mark.


The countries of Europe and of America had already had full resource to Libyan oil, in the way that it suits them, available on the world market. That has been disrupted in fact by the war SO IT IS NOT ABOUT OIL.


The war is not over oil, but is about control and power.


Kosovo was the forerunner of Libya. The war was not over Milosevic but over NATO power and the alliance which NATO was making in this struggle for power. Real shades of the New World Order, not the fantasies of Alex Jones, but political reality!


The economic crisis continues to deepen, sometimes at an alarming rate. The bottom line here is that these economies of Europe and America, taken in an overall sense, are unable to grow their markets significantly


The world is driving towards war and Fascist type dictatorships because of these underlying contradictions, which the capitalist elites would like to fix, but try as they might cannot do so.


The other complication is a resurgent Islam, with its internal laws determining that it must fight to control the world.


However, NATO and the capitalist elites have learned great lessons from considering in all its forms the phenomenon of Islam.


The main lesson of the 9.11 Jihadist attack on the Twin Towers in New York that the elites have learned is that this type of terrorism can be used to their advantage also. And used to create new forms of rule, moving to dictatorships, as the economic crisis in capitalism deepens, and this need is thrust upon the capitalist and Stalinist elites, whether they wish to or not. There is not yet broad fascist movements (bodies of men on the streets) but there is deep confusion inside populations, and that will be the future too.


  1. Bush claimed immediately that Islam was a Religion of Peace, such a radical inversion of reality, that it must be significant
  2. Thus the wars which followed under Bush were not wars on Islam, but actually wars in which to prove hypothesis 1 of Bush above, wars to promote a supposed brand of Islam which would live at peace with Imperialism. So note, the issue in the War was not to save the Jews from Holocaust, and today the issue is neither to save the young Muslim girls from the Taliban!
  3. Central was the alliance with Iran, Syria, Hizbullah, Hamas, Fatah…that is with the most bloodthirsty elements of Islam. Note that the American Presidents talked loud but never touched these forces, in fact opposed the Iranian protesters, and actually saved Fatah, Hamas and Hizbullah
  4. In Afghanistan NATO has always been promoting Islam and that has to and will end with NATO betraying the women of Afghanistan to the Taliban cultural monsters
  5. In Iraq NATO places a regime in power which is driving all non-Muslims out of the country. Not one Jew remains in Mesopotamia, half the Christians, and growing, have fled. Above all Saddam as the only reap; opposition to Iranian fundamentalism was hung by NATP proxies. Again look what happens, Iran thanks to NATO, emerges more powerful
  6. The ruling class have played 9.11 in order to create great disruption of the way of life of American people
  7. Agents of this ruling class, otherwise known as “conspiracy theorists”, have introduced a moral and intellectual relativism into discourse. Rather than a search for truth, people are encouraged to be subjective idealists, to treat every idea as subjective, often described by crooked talk show hosts as “Everybody is entitled to their opinion”.
  8. And a society is engineered where people get away with murder, especially murder of defenceless Muslim women, and Sharia Law is openly touted on BBC, on radio stations. What distinguishes the progressive forces, like Geller, Spencer, Belman, Gorin, Wilders and others is that they bring facts about Islam out into the open. NOTE…every living human has an agenda, in fact my dog and cat both have very specific agendas, the dividing line among humans though is who opens up our reality for awareness, who is trying to hide and disguise that reality.


Today brave and principled men and women in Florida, USA, are placing a picket at the NOW (National Organization for Women) conference.


The main speaker at the conference is a woman who was responsible for passing off the murder of Fatima Abdullah as an accident. Similarly the police in Tampa took no action to investigate whether it was murder of accident. Due to the injuries on Fatima, and due to the repression that she was suffering in the Muslim family situation, the case cries out for the closest investigation by every branch of authority involved.



Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011

Subject: RE: Adamsv@hillsboroughcounty.org; Lhairme@AOL.com

I am replying to your email on behalf of Bureau Chief Glen Hopkins, since I am the staff member responsible for investigating complaints against medical examiners and associate medical examiners.  

We have contacted the District Thirteen Medical Examiner’s Office in order to obtain information from their files in this case.  We will keep you apprised of our investigation into this matter. Please keep in mind that the Medical Examiners Commission is only able to investigate the portion of this complaint that involves the District 13 Medical Examiner, and his Associate Medical Examiners. The portions of this complaint involving the State Attorney’s Office and Law Enforcement agencies that also participated in the investigation are beyond our jurisdiction.


Doug Culbertson


Medical Examiners Commission Staff


But the state authorities are very loath to get involved in any kind of prosecution of Muslims.

Pamela Geller is correct to focus on the “Feminists” of NOW


Sometimes these kinds of groups as NOW have a tinge of leftism about them, but the nature of this “leftism” needs to be examined.


Take the American working class. It has a long history of fight and struggle, even to exist in trade union organization. I know this because Irish heroes James Connolly, executed by the British 1916, and Big Jim Larkin, legendary syndicalist, played a big role in the formation of the American Unions, at a time when leaders of unions were not bureaucrats but fighters.


What the American workers need today is the truth…about everything.


No empty propaganda…they need to see clearly what is around and in front of them.


With the murders on 9.11 Islam has already made itself felt in America. But not just America.


Because of its unique position the American workers are taught narrow nationalism, but actually need to have a world view. On the world stage Islam is a very huge factor indeed

So there are at least 2 things involved here. One…the nature of Islam on issues such as treatment of women, a big factor in all unions. Two…how supposed feminist movements like NOW face up


What will these NOW feminists do about Fatima Abdallah?


So when Pamela Geller takes up the issue of Muslim violence towards women in Muslim families then she and they are placing under the microscope these leaders like in NOW, and asking specific questions about their “leftism”.


Such as how can you claim to be for the workers and hide the reality of this form of repression of the most disadvantaged, such as women like Fatima Abdallah.


We repeat the workers of America must be able to understand about all of human life, in its harsh reality.


Here we have organizations like NOW, and many other leftist groups, who are trying to hide from American workers the reality of Islam.


Pamela Geller who is classified as “right” wing is actually helping American workers to understand the reality of Islam.


But who is left and who is right! Meaningless terms in the context of these affairs!


Pamela Geller is actually a better friend to the American working class people than these “leftists” who cover for the Nazi Fascism of Islam.




Stand against Islamic supremacism, gender apartheid, and Islamic law in American law enforcement and courts. Call out the feminists and the Tampa Chief of Police, Jane Castor.

National NOW Conference June 24-26 in Tampa, Florida, at the Embassy Suites Tampa – USF/Near Busch Gardens. Jane Castor, Tampa Chief of Police, is scheduled to deliver the Welcome Speech from 1:45 – 2:00 pm

Feminazi silence


The irony is thicker than blood. Jane Castor, Tampa Chief of Police — scene of the misogynistic Abdallah cover-up in submission to Islam — is speaking to a feminist crowd on what? The upside of the dehumanizaton of women? The hypocrisy is crushing. NOW, instead of fighting for women, has taken up genocidal jihad flotillas.



Breakout Session IV: Saturday, 10:45am – 12:15pm

Behind the Veil: Islam and Women’s Rights

Salon B

With the recent burqa ban in France, there has been much talk about the role of women in Islam. Is Islam inherently sexist? Can a woman actually choose to cover herself? As feminists, should we have a goal of helping to liberate Muslim women? What is the role of women in the recent Arab Spring? Workshop panelists include a human rights activist who has traveled extensively in conflict regions; an American of Palestinian and Egyptian descent outspoken on feminism and the Middle East and North African uprisings; and a civil rights legal fellow at the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Tampa. Come to an honest and eye-opening dialogue about the role of women in Islam, and learn how both Muslim and non-Muslim feminists can work together to further feminism.

N. Jerin Arifa (Moderator), Amala M. Abdur-Rahman, Neveen Nawawy, Laila M. Abdelaziz













Dutch far-right politician Geert Wilders has been acquitted of charges of inciting hatred against Muslims.

Mr Wilders had described Islam as “fascist”, comparing the Koran to Hitler’s Mein Kampf.

He insisted his statements were directed at Islam and not at Muslim believers – something which is legal under Dutch law.

Judge Marcel van Oosten told him his statements were “acceptable within the context of public debate”.

“The bench finds that although gross and degenerating, it did not give rise to hatred,” he said.

The verdict was greeted with applause from Mr Wilders’ supporters in the public gallery.

Outside the courtroom, the 47-year-old politician said he was “incredibly happy”…





Geert Wilders Verdict: Not Guilty All Counts! Eureka!

West 1  Islam 0

The judges have delivered their verdict in the heresy trial of Dutch freedom politician Geert Wilders for inciting hatred against Muslims. NOT GUILTY of all charges of inciting hatred against Muslims. When do the Islamic supremacists go on trial for inciting hatred against non-Muslims?

Charges against Geert Wilders

  1. Intentionally offending Muslims
  2. Inciting hatred against Muslims
  3. Inciting discrimination against Muslims
  4. Inciting hatred of non-western immigrants

The islamic supremacists who initiated the case told judges that Mr Wilders’ comments have led to a rise in discrimination and violence against Muslims. This is the enforcement of blasphemy laws under Islamic law.

The case began on October 4 last year, but collapsed after three weeks when a special legal panel ruled the judges may have shown partiality following a string of legal blunders. New judges were then sworn in and the case was heard again this year. (Dutch News)

The Islamic supremacist ‘plaintiffs’ were seeking a one-euro fine. But it’s not about a largely symbolic fine, it is about a triumph over the tenets of Western law and free speech They said if they didn’t get their symbolic one-euro pne,y don’t get it,  they say they will consider taking their case to the European Court of Human Rights. Ah yes, take it to the anti-humans under the guise of human rights.


















4 international has sent the following email to the authorities in Florida in order to have the honour of this young Muslim woman respected





Dear Dr. Adams,

Any kind of accident is possible, but if this young Muslim woman Fatima Abdallah died as a result of an accident, then it would have to be in the category of highly unusual. Given then that it has to be classed as highly unusual, in order to do justice to this now sadly departed young Muslim woman no stone should be left unturned to find out what really happened. We owe that to this young woman. Her life seems to have been very sad, no real voice was allowed to her in life, we should make sure she has a voice now at last. Please listen to Pamela Geller on this. I think she is in the right.


email sent to Adamsv@hillsboroughcounty.org


June 24th “Rally for Fatima” at NOW Conference: Protest Feminist Silence on Honor Killings and Fatima Abdallah’s Cover-Up

Does being a Muslim mean you can get away with murder?

Friday, June 24th, 1:00 – 2:00

Embassy Suites Tampa – USF/Near Busch Gardens
3705 Spectrum Blvd.
Tampa, Florida 33612 2011

Stand against Islamic supremacism, gender apartheid, and Islamic law in American law enforcement and courts. Call out the feminists and the Tampa Chief of Police, Jane Castor.

National NOW Conference June 24-26 in Tampa, Florida, at the Embassy Suites Tampa – USF/Near Busch Gardens. Jane Castor, Tampa Chief of Police, is scheduled to deliver the Welcome Speech from 1:45 – 2:00 pm

Feminazi silence

The irony is thicker than blood. Jane Castor, Tampa Chief of Police — scene of the misogynistic Abdallah cover-up in submission to Islam — is speaking to a feminist crowd on what? The upside of the dehumanizaton of women? The hypocrisy is crushing. NOW, instead of fighting for women, has taken up genocidal jihad flotillas.

Let’s call out the feminist claptrap about women’s rights when they stand silent as Muslim girls are murdered here in America, and stand silent in the face of gender apartheid, clitorectomies, forced marriage, child marriage under the sharia in Muslim countries.

What has the hypocrite group NOW done to alleviate the suffering of women living under the boot of Islam? Nothing. Their silence is sanction. What have they done to help Muslim girls here in the US living in terror in devout households?

This Friday we are going to protest the NOW conference taking place in Tampa, scene of the Fatima Abdallah cover-up. The honor killing was classified as an accidental suicide. Medical examiner Laura Harris ruled Fatima’s honor killing an accidental suicide by banging her head on the coffee table (there was no blood on the coffee table). The Tampa police department went along with this horrible crime.

Fatima Abdallah’s “mouth was bloodied by a blow, and at the left corner of her mouth is an angular cut/incision/indentation, which only could have been made by a blow.” Also, “her left eye orbit was broken, and her left eye socket was blackened, suffering a blow causing hemorrhaging of blood about the eye.” And “her right arm had contusions at the front inside of the elbow, and at the shoulder near the front armpit, consistent with being grasped forcibly by human hands.”

Where are the feminist liars and imposters? Is a Muslim woman’s life worthless? Is it politically expedient to allow enforcement of the sharia, so as not to offend Muslims? 

Jane Castor, Tampa Police Dept. Chief, will be speaking. PLEASE PROTEST WITH SIOA.

The 2011 National NOW Conference is being held June 24-26 in Tampa, Florida, at the Embassy Suites Tampa – USF/Near Busch Gardens.

Jane Castor, Tampa Chief of Police, is scheduled to deliver the Welcome Speech from 1:45 – 2:00 pm, so let’s RALLY FOR JUSTICE FOR FATIMA from 1:00 – 2:00,  in front of the hotel. Look for the signs!

Fatima rally crimscene Fatima rally poster

You can register ($35) on site that weekend  at 3701 E. Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL, if you would also like to attend:

Breakout Session IV: Saturday, 10:45am – 12:15pm

Behind the Veil: Islam and Women’s Rights

Salon B

With the recent burqa ban in France, there has been much talk about the role of women in Islam. Is Islam inherently sexist? Can a woman actually choose to cover herself? As feminists, should we have a goal of helping to liberate Muslim women? What is the role of women in the recent Arab Spring? Workshop panelists include a human rights activist who has traveled extensively in conflict regions; an American of Palestinian and Egyptian descent outspoken on feminism and the Middle East and North African uprisings; and a civil rights legal fellow at the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Tampa. Come to an honest and eye-opening dialogue about the role of women in Islam, and learn how both Muslim and non-Muslim feminists can work together to further feminism.

N. Jerin Arifa (Moderator), Amala M. Abdur-Rahman, Neveen Nawawy, Laila M. Abdelaziz



Hundreds of Atlas readers have written to Dr. Vernard Adams of the Hillsborough County Medical Examiners. Keep writing. And call, too: his phone number is 813 914 4500. Each of us should call to notify him of our next email campaign to the medical examiner’s commission.

Please write to Governor Scott as well. Email Brian.Hughes@eog.myflorida.com, doug.darling@eog.myflorida.com, RScott@RickScottForFlorida.com, Rick.Scott@eog.myflorida.com
 Cc: Adamsv@hillsboroughcounty.org, Lhairme@AOL.com, GlenHopkins@fdle.state.fl.us, GeraldBailey@fdle.state.fl.us

We must rally again. Please come if you can




Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs has it precisely right. The crisis of Obama all centres on his defence of Islam, and essentially his promotion of Islam


But Obama expresses something which is very deep in Western Capitalist Culture. Note what his advisor Brennan says.


Also George W. Bush and McCain, all good Republicans said roughly the same and that only touches the surface.


Geller pinpoints the issue with Obama here:

He refuses to identify Islamic terror, jihad or religious motivation. His counter terror adviser, John Brennan, says, “jihad is a legitimate tennt of islam,” so what exactly is Obama fighting in these four wars, and who is he fighting for


Lawmakers sue President Obama over Libya

Finally, elected officials are holding a runaway President to account. Does anyone know what the hell we hope to accomplish in Libya? What is Obama’s endgame in Libya, aiding al qaeda? On May 20th, the 60th day of Obama’s war in Libya, Obama was requird by law to get Congressional approval to continue his ops in Libya. The war he consulted no one about, the war he did not go to Congress on, the tyrant’s war.

He is now engaged in four wars: Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and a secret war in Yemen, and his strategy in Afghanistan and Iraq has resulted in the highest US military casualty rates, year over year, since  these engagements began (in July 2009, I called it — Obama’s Afghanistan strategy: target US military). He refuses to identify Islamic terror, jihad or religious motivation. His counter terror adviser, John Brennan, says, “jihad is a legitimate tennt of islam,” so what exactly is Obama fighting in these four wars, and who is he fighting for?

Mind you, I have little in common with some of the lawmakers who filed the suit (i.e., Kucinich, Conyers, and Rand, for example), but then, even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Where the hell is the media? Busy shining his shoes.

Lawmakers sue President Obama over Libya Politico

A bipartisan group of House members announced on Wednesday that it is filing a lawsuit charging that President Obama made an illegal end-run around Congress when he approved U.S military action against Libya.

the suit will challenge the Obama administration’s “circumvention of Congress and its use of international organizations such as the United Nations and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to authorize the use of military force abroad.”

It also will ask a judge to prohibit the White House from conducting a war without congressional approval.

Kucinich has scheduled a press conference at noon in front of the D.C. federal courthouse.

The suit comes a day after House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) sent Obama a letter claiming that military action in Libya will violate the 1973 War Powers Resolution if it does not end by Friday, 90 days after it began.

The Kucinich-Jones group also includes Democrats John Conyers of Michigan and Michael Capuano of Massachusetts and Republicans Howard Coble of North Carolina, John Duncan of Tennessee, Roscoe Bartlett of Maryland, Ron Paul of Texas, Tim Johnson of Illinois and Dan Burton of Indiana.












Stand with Atlas in Israel: Aqsa Parvez Grove of Trees Dedication and Beck’s Rally


Aqsa parvez grove 019


We will be dedicating the Aqsa Parvez Grove of Trees in memory of Aqsa and all honor killing victims worldwide in American Independence Park in Jerusalem on the afternoon of August 24th. This is the grove that you planted. This is the memorial park that you saw built so that voiceless girls were beloved, remembered and finally, free.

After we dedicate the Aqsa Parvez Grove of Trees in memory of Aqsa and all honor killing victims worldwide  we will be attending the Beck rally in solidarity with to the Beck event Israel in Jerusalem. I don’t have a VIP ticket, but will be going en masse and I hope you will, too.

Join me in Jerusalem to remember and raise awareness of Islamic honor killings worldwide. From there we will continue on to Beck’s rally to show our unwavering love and support of the tiny Jewish nation under siege from all points across the world, not in small measure from the White House.

I hope you’ll join us at both events. It is history. Be a part of it. If not now, when?


The Aqsa Parvez grove of trees, American Independence park, Jerusalem, Israel. August 24th.

Glenn Beck’s Jerusalem rally program unveiled YNET News

TV star’s solidarity event is expected to draw thousands of Israelis, Americans with music, pyrotechnics. Sarah Palin, republican presidential candidates set to drop by …..

Tens of thousands of excited Israelis and Americans, music performances, appearances by local and international celebrities, senior politicians and a live broadcast that will reach millions of viewers – this is just some of what is in store for Glenn Beck’s upcoming rally “to restore courage,” which is set to take place on August 24 in Jerusalem. Beck has been leading a publicity campaign for the event over the past few weeks, urging his viewers and listeners to fly out to the Holy Land.


This year, the Wailing Wall will replace Lincoln Memorial as the backdrop for the event, which will take place at Jerusalem’s Old City and the Teddy Stadium simultaneously.

The multi-million dollar production is expected to be attended by a convoy of American dignitaries, including former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin. US Senator Joe Lieberman, a independent, and Republicans Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Mike Huckabee and Congresswoman Michelle Bachman are to join Beck at the rally as well.

Those hoping for a VIP ticket will be disappointed to find out that the 600 prime seating spots at the Davidson Center have all been sold out – for $5,000 a pop. The rest of the spectators will have to settle for a spot at the stadium, or at the Sultan’s Pool archeological site. The main events will be broadcast on giant screens for a better view. The rally is open to the general public with free admission.

A series of musical performances, designed to lure Israeli audiences, are expected at the rally, and Beck said he intends to recruit some US star power for the event as well. A pyrotechnic show and free snacks and drinks are anticipated as well.

The bustle of preparation has also been felt at the Knesset: the legislative body is to host a meeting between the visiting dignitaries and their Israeli colleagues. World Likud Chairman MK Danny Danon is leading the Knesset’s cooperation with Beck. The two met in the US recently.

“Thousands of supporters will arrive in Israel just as the prophets of wrath are attempting to frighten the public,” Danon said. “With a tremendous show of force we will send a clear message that we are not scared, and we believe in our eternal right for Jerusalem and the land of Israel.”


ABC1 Four Corners television programme

REPORT FROM http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/05/30/3230817.htm

The issue is about world capitalism. The issue is about the greed of the human species as it is driven by capitalism to make dough. The issue is about in the obsession with making dough our animal cousins can go to hell

Hell is what the animals from Australia seem to be getting aplenty in Indonesian Sharia Killing Fields

Take this

Animals Australia spokeswoman Glenys Oogjes says Australia has no power to make Indonesia comply with these guidelines.

“The OIE guidelines are minimal standards for developing countries that allow practices that are illegal in Australia to take place,” she said.


And here take the 2 faced verbal crap from this greedy Australian politician as spokesman for greedy and stupid Australian farmers:

Agriculture Minister Joe Ludwig said in budget estimates last week that he had been concerned about the live animal trade for some time and criticised the industry for being too slow in addressing welfare concerns.

But in April, during a speech to the Northern Territory Cattleman’s Association in Darwin, he reiterated the Australian Government’s continued support of the live export trade.

“The live animal export sector is the backbone of many rural and regional communities across Australia, including northern Australia, as it provides a valuable market option for producers,” he said.

Typical you slug Ludwig! You could care less about these animals!


In Spain where I am presently residing I see precisely this “make money and screw the animals” approach. I see goat farmers who use dogs (usually tied up to a tree or something for their lives), to have them bark at night, to keep foxes at bay which are dangerous to their goats, but they hardly feed their dogs anything, maybe some stale bread if they are lucky. The worst of it is these Spanish dogs are nearly always extremely affectionate creatures.

I was alerted to this foul adaptation to cruel Sharia of Australia by a BBC World Service report. In it a cattle farmer was interviewed, name of Colin Ross, and he was figuring out the consequences. There can be terrible suffering if the trade collapses, that is for sure, because the dry land will not be able to take the double load. But Ross is typical. he should have thought on this before. He only thinks about Indonesia cruelty now because he is worried about his wallet. Typical farmer driving for profit. Philosophy is “F..k the animals!”  I know that attitude so well.

Rest of report is here:

Doco reveals Australian cattle tortured overseas

By Anne Worthington for Four Corners

Updated Mon May 30, 2011 4:29pm AEST

PreviousNextSlideshow: Photo 1 of 2

Animals Australia filmed in 11 randomly chosen abattoirs in Indonesia and provided the footage to Four Corners

Animals Australia filmed in 11 randomly chosen abattoirs in Indonesia and provided the footage to Four Corners (ABC TV)

Horrific footage from inside Indonesian abattoirs that use Australian cattle has revealed abuse of the animals is widespread.

Footage to be aired on ABC1’s Four Corners tonight shows animals kicked, thrashed and beaten, their throats hacked at, eyes gouged and tails broken.

According to analysis of the footage by RSPCA chief scientist Bidda Jones, some animals show signs of possible consciousness when they are dismembered.

In March this year, animal welfare campaigners Animals Australia filmed in 11 randomly chosen abattoirs in Indonesia and provided the footage to Four Corners.

More than a month later, a Four Corners team went to Indonesia and filmed in abattoirs where cattle suffered prolonged and painful deaths.

Animals Australia spokeswoman Lyn White brought Egypt’s live export trade to a halt in 2006 after exposing animal cruelty in Cairo.

She says her suspicions were raised after the live export industry released a report in January describing animal welfare in Indonesia as generally good.

“We had assumed that because there were greater level of industry involvement in Indonesia, the treatment of the livestock would have been better,” she said.

“But we couldn’t have been more wrong.”



The abattoirs featured on Four Corners are well-known to the Australian industry, which has installed equipment and provided training in Indonesian abattoirs to help with the handling of Australian cattle since 2000.

The live export industry was shown the vision from four Indonesian abattoirs prior to an interview.

LiveCorp CEO Cameron Hall described the scenes as “graphic and disturbing”, and announced the suspension of the supply of Australian cattle to three of the four abattoirs.

The fourth abattoir, Gondrong in Jakarta, was the scene of sustained suffering by Australian animals.

When asked why Gondrong is continuing to process Australian cattle, Mr Hall says training can address the issues.

A statement released by industry last week said: “A team of Australian cattle experts will fly to Indonesia this weekend to deliver this training to priority facilities, including this facility.”

But Four Corners has revealed the facility has already been visited six times by industry representatives in the past 14 months.

There are 100 abattoirs in Indonesia that slaughter Australian animals. Since the trade began 20 years ago, more than 6.5 million cattle have been shipped to Indonesia for slaughter.

Big bucks and metal boxes

Indonesia is Australia’s key market for live cattle exports, taking 60 per cent of all cattle, and in 2010, the trade was worth more than $300 million.

The Australian livestock export industry and the Australian Government have invested more than $4 million into improving animal welfare in Indonesia over the past 10 years.

The majority of funding has been invested into Australian-designed metal restraining boxes.

The RSPCA says the boxes are inadequate and stunning the animal prior to slaughter is the only humane option.

There are currently only six Indonesian abattoirs that use stunning.

Last week the industry launched its welfare action plan, which included providing stunning equipment to five additional abattoirs by the end of this year.

The new plan also says from 2015, Australian livestock will only be supplied to facilities who meet the OIE (World Organisation for Animal Health) standards.

But Indonesia is already a signatory to the OIE.

Animals Australia spokeswoman Glenys Oogjes says Australia has no power to make Indonesia comply with these guidelines.

“The OIE guidelines are minimal standards for developing countries that allow practices that are illegal in Australia to take place,” she said.

Agriculture Minister Joe Ludwig said in budget estimates last week that he had been concerned about the live animal trade for some time and criticised the industry for being too slow in addressing welfare concerns.

But in April, during a speech to the Northern Territory Cattleman’s Association in Darwin, he reiterated the Australian Government’s continued support of the live export trade.

“The live animal export sector is the backbone of many rural and regional communities across Australia, including northern Australia, as it provides a valuable market option for producers,” he said.

Watch the full report on Four Corners tonight at 8.30pm on ABC1



Dawn Raid: Scores of Non-Muslim Schoolgirls From Muslim Sex Gangs

(Atlas Shrugs has this)

This is just another in a long line of busts of Muslim gangs in the UK grooming underage non-Muslim girls for sex slavery. Has the UK so lost its civilizational spine that their children are now booty for the Muslim invaders? Stop importing these marauderers and destroyers.

I have reported on these Muslim oppressors repeatedly, and still these news stories are a shock to the system. What’s it going to take?

Dawn raids across Manchester as police move in on gang who groomed under-age girls at drug-fuelled sex parties Daily Mail By Jaya Narain (hat tip Tel)

Dozens of vulnerable teenage girls may have been rescued from the clutches of a paedophiles after a major police operation smashed a child sex gang.

Around 100 officers swooped on houses in a series of raids yesterday arresting 10 men suspected of grooming young girls for sex.

The victims were allegedly showered with gifts and then plied with drink and drugs before being taken to special ‘sex parties’ in Manchester and Salford.

friends of the gang in what police say was a classic case of ‘sexual grooming and entrapment.’ Last night the men, all aged between 18-28, were being questioned by detectives at a number of different police stations across the North West.

A mattress is taken away from one of the homes raided as part of Operation WindermereA mattress is taken away from one of the homes raided as part of Operation Windermere

They are the latest in a wave of arrests carried out by police investigating gangs of Asian [Muslim] men grooming underage white girls for sex

A string of disturbing cases in the Midlands and north of England prompted the launch of a nationwide investigation to look into the phenomenon.

In January Former Home Secretary Jack Straw was accused of ‘stereotyping after suggesting some men of Pakistani origin see white girls as ‘easy meat’.

Last night police were confident they had smashed yet another alleged gang after arresting the 10 men – seven Asian [Muslim], two white and one black – on suspected child sex offences.

The arrests in Manchester, Salford and Buxton come after a major three-month inquiry into the sexual exploitation of a number of girls.

Detectives say at least 39 underage girls have been spoken to, either as suspected victims or witnesses, as part of the major probe.

It is understood a only six or seven alleged sex gang victims have been identified but detectives believe the true number runs into dozens.

Police say the alleged victims had been groomed by the older men who bought them meals or took them out for all-expenses-paid nights out.

The girls were understood to have been lured off the street with promises of cannabis, amphetamines, jewellery, new pairs of trainers and trips out to fast food restaurants.

After four of five weeks of ‘affection and flattery’, it is claimed, gang members would then ask for sex often after first giving the girls drink and drugs.

It is understood the girls – all aged around 14 and upwards – would also be taken to the ‘sex parties’ at flats and houses, where they would be ‘handed out’ to other men.

Read the rest.

Previously at Atlas: UK: Muslim Gang Charged in Child “Prostitution Ring” Charges …
Muslim gang rape girls as young as 12 Somali Muslim Gangs Ran Sex Ring in 3 U.S. States –
Islam Gone Wild
Dutch Girls Stoned by Muslim Gang in The Netherlands
Muslim Violence Infects, Spreads Across Continents


BBC News, 8 June

Eight men have been remanded in custody over allegations of grooming and committing sexual activity with teenage girls in Rochdale, Greater Manchester.

The charges against them include rape, paying for sexual services of a child, trafficking a child and controlling child prostitution.

Those charged are among 26 arrested in relation to the sexual exploitation of teenage girls since 2008.

The charges are based on allegations by four teenage girls from Rochdale.

Border Agency

All eight appeared before Rochdale Magistrates’ Court earlier and will appear at Bolton Crown Court on 22 June.

The charged men are:

  • Abdul Rauf, 42, of Darley Road, Rochdale, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16, sexual activity and paying for the sexual services of a child and trafficking a child within the UK
  • Mohammed Ikhlaq, 41 of Cloverhall Crescent, Rochdale, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16
  • Adil Khan, 41, of Oswald Street, Rochdale, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16, two offences of sexual activity, and trafficking a child within the UK
  • Liaquat Shah, 41, of Kensington Street, Rochdale, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16 and two counts of rape
  • Mohammed Sajid, 34, of Jepheys Street, Rochdale, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with a girl under 16, three offences of sexual activity and attempting to pay for the sexual services of a child
  • Qamar Shahzad, 29, of Tweedale Street, Freehold, Rochdale, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16 and rape
  • Mohammed Amin, 44, of Falinge Road, Falinge, Rochdale, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16, sexual assault and sexual activity
  • Abdul Aziz, 40, of Armstrong Hurst Close, Rochdale, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16, trafficking girls, rape and controlling child prostitution




Much evidence has surfaced that the Srebrenica “Massacre” story is a giant hoax to rival that of Racak, Qana and the notorious Mohammed el Dura/France 2 story. We have seen from the observations of John Peter Maher that there were no reports of a massacre in Srebrenica for months and months. Why was that? You would think that if there was a massacre of 8000 by the Serbs, given the hatred in the Media for the Serbs that it would have been all over the Daily Mail every day from day one. Actually the official “Dutch Report” shows that the massacre hoax story was assembled by the NGOs, by the Media, and by the shadowy forces of the US State department with help from the British and French, therefore the significant time delay which Mr Maher spotted, which makes an examination of that Dutch Report well worthwhile.

They claimed 8000 men and boys murdered by the Serbs in Srebrenica. Sometimes it is 7000 but not quite so often. It was usually 8000.

In reviewing the Irish newspaper of record, The Irish Times, they have written from 1995 to the present in major articles referring to this Srebrenica Massacre where the Serbs murdered 8000 men and boys, going now up to 500 times since 1995, averaging out a major article every 10 days or so.

Are there 2000 such papers and magazines etc. in the world doing this? I think so and much more but if so that makes it a million such vital articles broadcast into humanity. All saying the same thing, the endless repetition, that the Serbs murdered 8000 Muslims in Srebrenica.

But there is also The Dutch Report which these media outlets seem to have stuffed deep into the unknown recesses of their filing cabinets. Thanks to Mick Tanzer a regular reader for sending details of this report to 4international. 

I call it here the Dutch report, usually The Report

(Dutch Institute for War Documentation, Nederlands Instituut voor Oorlogsdocumentatie)

“Then there is this astonishing and explosive material from the Dutch “Netherlands Institute for War Documentation” Report [from 2002]This blows the lid off of how Clinton, Albright, the Western media and NATO created the Srebrenica Big Lie:

(no longer can the report be reached at this url)

(A friend has sent me the following information. This message indicates to me how quickly important documents can be removed, or become corrupted in some way, on the net:)


(It is here as a .zip file:



You need to unzip it and then open the files locally in your browser.

That’s OK for reading it but not much good for citing pages.


I have informed NIOD that the link isn’t working but I don’t think they ever replied. Maybe if everyone complains they might do something…)



This report by obviously staid conservative type people has been an absolute eye-opener.

There is much evidence therein that the Media, Dutch and British politicians, or one can say almost the whole EU political class, created this Srebrenica Hoax story between them.

Let me emphasise one more time the point made by Peter Maher, and which I proved to myself also after some study of The Irish Times reporting, in these weeks following the “massacre” there was nary a mention of the supposed deed.

This is very important to keep firmly in mind.


So with the Dutch Report my attention moved to the study which they made of how and when the stories of a massacre began to come together.



I am not a paid academic. There is much in it I did not read. But I did study this section of the report which deals with the investigations in Tuzla and I do believe it is the key section.

To help I have started by naming some of the main characters which I have simply culled from the report:

Two organizations that the report tends to lump together…UNHCR and the International Red Cross


From Zagreb, a combined team of the Human Rights Office of Civil Affairs and the UN Centre for Human Rights


The ‘Bosnian State Commission for the collection of information on war crimes’


The Tribunal, the key court and element in the story, we all know what that is, the ICTY of course


Amnesty International


A number of smaller NGOs.


UNHCR Protection Officer Manca de Nissa


Christoph Girod of the International Red Cross


I have noted them above but would like to draw special attention to again…

a mixed team from Civil Affairs/Human Rights Office (HRO) and UNCHR mostly from Zagreb


And from there…


Ken Bizer from Civil Affairs


HRO staff member Peggy Hicks.


(Please note this name “Peggy Hicks” very carefully. When the evidence was showing no killings at all by the Serbs, and she admitted this, she began even as she admitted same to claim the very opposite in her reports)

I am certain I have omitted some but these two are also very important in this part of the Report:


Swiss investigator R. Salvisberg, UNCHR Bosnia coordinator based in Sarajevo


T. Mazowiecki, the Special Rapporteur for Human Rights who arrived in Tuzla on 22 July, and was required to facilitate a visit to Izetbegovic’s military men, that is military men from the “safe area” which was Srebrenica. As I describe below I found this not a little fishy!



In the report Tuzla was the key area, the area and city where the Big Lie was hatched. It was a place where many groups and shady individuals miraculously made their way to. Especially these special NGO organizations…operating like scavengers in that very Tuzla.

Tuzla was under the control of the US.

The reader needs to try to come to an understanding and opinion of what Tuzla was like in those days following the supposed “massacre”

You could start with understanding that the refugees were bussed there from Srebrenica. I make these further points to try to get a mental picture of Tuzla:

That the hatred for the Serbs in the international press was intense

That all roads led to Tuzla.

That the column eventually limped into Tuzla

Tuzla became the centre for all Serb haters and for a time the centre of Serb Hate Frenzy

To complete this mental image think of all the gutter capitalist media of the world also making their way there. There was serb hatred, there was a story, there was money, there was promotion out of pleasing the editor!



The Dutch report was written (I found) in “careful” language.

These are no revolutionaries who write this report but rather they are academics.

Consequently they, the writers of the report, use a reserved style.

Nevertheless what they are saying, and sometimes it needs a little reading between the lines because of that very reserve, is of great importance for our argument that the whole Srebrenica Massacre claim is a total hoax.

If they sometimes lose their nerve at the enormity of what they are saying and who they are challenging then we can readily understand.

We concentrate on the section dealing with the refugees in Tuzla as they were interviewed by the above mentioned people, and also the Muslim soldiers who had broken out in a military column.

THUS…The reader new to this will soon understand that in understanding about Srebrenica Tuzla was the key place, not actually Srebrenica.

There was NO massacre by Serbs of any Muslims in Srebrenica. That is a Big Lie. But the Big Lie had to be invented and it was in Tuzla that it was invented, put together bit by bit, and the Dutch Report shows exactly how that happened.

That makes the Dutch Report the absolutely key document in finding the truth.

You will notice the reserved, almost understated, style that is used, but I hope to show that despite this their meaning is crystal clear if the reader only takes the time to ponder on the thought therein.



So the Dutch Report investigators honed in on Tuzla.

We ask again why Tuzla? What brought the investigation to there?

Most people will see on television reports that the women children and elderly men were bussed to Tuzla. This was in alliance with the United Nations. The Muslims wanted to go because Tuzla was under their side.

They went straight to Tuzla. Moreover these Muslims trusted the Serbs, trusted Mladic, and knew there would be no problems. And there were no problems.

Men who were captured were arrested and held for screening, which was totally normal. This WAS a war. Over 3000 Serb peasants had been murdered in their isolated homesteads in the 3 previous years by the Muslim thugs of the SDA. The Muslims in Srebrenica were NEVER disarmed. It was in fact a jihadist camp and killing centre for Serb Christians as victims.

Even without that the Serb army was right to screen all who came out of that Jihadist centre of murder of Christians



Investigations among Displaced Persons

These methodological problems, as well as the hindrances created by the Bosnian authorities, also confronted the interviewers who approached the Displaced Persons for information on behalf of various organizations.

(Methodological problems indeed! The report writers get straight to the point, and the jugular, of the Islamist Bosnian leaders. If they were claiming a massacre then why on earth, if there was a massacre, would the Islamist leaders be placing “hindrances” in front of the investigators. By all the laws of common sense that does not make sense of any kind. Except it was phoney and they were actually at that very time “constructing” a massacre, a fake massacre. Think about it!)

Important roles were assigned to UNHCR and the International Red Cross, but they were joined from Zagreb by a combined team of the Human Rights Office of Civil Affairs and the UN Centre for Human Rights. Furthermore various other bodies were active, such as the ‘Bosnian State Commission for the collection of information on war crimes’, as well as the Tribunal, Amnesty International and a number of smaller NGOs.

(The vital two words in the above are “but” and “Furthermore”. It is the grammar which conveys the message. The first two organizations mentioned had “important roles” which “were assigned” to them and then there is the “but” and the “furthermore”. There is no doubt that the report is extremely annoyed with the plethora of groups all with their own agenda who descended upon Tuzla. This will become very clear as we go further.)

Some of these were eager to publicize their findings as soon as possible. As early as 31 July, for instance, the US Committee on Refugees published an extensive report on the ‘death march’ from Srebrenica based on interviews conducted by its staff member Bill Frelick in Tuzla and the surroundings.[1]

(And publishing as soon as possible in the eyes of the report means publishing on the basis of biased evidence, because the rule of the game is that they were only talking to biased Muslims. The seriousness of this becomes clear later)

Due to the nature of their work most of the organizations were cautious about publicizing politically sensitive information. UNHCR was less reserved in this respect and several times its spokespersons released details from the ‘unconfirmed reports’ by Displaced Persons.

(Look at what has happened! The writers of the Report obviously do not like this. They do not like the use of “unconfirmed reports”. They have that reserved way of voicing their displeasure or opposition.


The Report began with 2 main investigating organizations, plus a lot more that they definitely are in conflict with. But within the space of a few sentences one of these two is failing miserably their test of intellectual rigour. That is the UNHCR which the Report is here critical of its method of reporting, basically dishonest, using “unconfirmed” evidence. In the eyes of this report that leaves just the one, the Red Cross. But later it too seems suspect on some issues so that leaves…well precisely none!)

This included the suspicion that the VRS had used Dutchbat uniforms to mislead refugees.[2] Serious research, however, was commenced only on 21 July after Protection Officer Manca de Nissa had arrived in Tuzla. He submitted his report a week later, based on 70 interviews with both normal Displaced Persons and survivors of the march. Manca de Nissa did not however draw any conclusions about possible large-scale murders.[3]

(And there you have it. The only “serious research” strictly opposes any idea of “massacre”. That is truly what The Report was finding as it looked back and examined closely the evidence from the interviews in these few weeks after the “event”)

(So by about the 28th July, according to that, de Nissa had interviewed an awful lot of the Muslims in Tuzla, and not one mention of massacre)


[start quote here]

It was much more difficult for an organization such as the International Red Cross to publicize findings. The strictly observed neutrality ruled out any statements that could be given a political slant.

(Which raises the question what other way is there to carry out investigations. That they mention it like this shows how they disapprove of what was taking place under the name of  “journalism”)

Another factor in this case was that the delegates were only too familiar with the Bosnian propaganda (this is the Islamist leadership of Izetbegovic who dates back to Himmler and El Husseini in the Holocaust) and thus usually regarded the rumours issuing from Tuzla with great suspicion.

(They are not beating around the bush here. The report is saying that the Red Cross is aware of the dishonesty of the Islamists)

In a communiqué on 14 July, three days after the fall of the enclave, nothing was said about missing persons or possible summary executions. Nevertheless, staff of the International Red Cross had already gathered much information by this time. Although the International Red Cross had no official access to the men who arrived in Tuzla from 16 July onwards, staff had in fact spoken to several of them. A communiqué of 19 July however mentioned only that the International Red Cross demanded of the Bosnian Serbs that it be given access to prisoners. Still no mention was made of deaths.

(So after much investigation by 19 July not a word about deaths. Why not? Because there was no unbiased evidence that there were deaths, meaning massacres)

But according to Christoph Girod of the International Red Cross the pressure was increasing.[4] Consequently, at a press conference on 31 July, Girod referred to the fact that there were 5000 to 6000 missing persons with the statement: ‘We have no indications of this whatsoever’.

(They, that is The Report writers, are flagging the pressure from the lies of the Media.)

It was only on 14 August that the International Red Cross first dared to publicly mention the possibility of executions.[5]

(Note the “possibility” of executions. Who is arguing! But possibility is very far from fact! Surely!)

[end quote here]


Then the conflict between the Red Cross and the UN groups from Croatia. The real reason is not given here.

There is the mention that Tizer was (had been previously) refused permission to visit Srebrenica. That is Tizer from the Croatian base. Why did the Serbs do this? Real reason is that Tizer and this whole mob from Croatia’s Zagreb were suspected by the Serbs as being CIA. In investigating Roy Gutman, the journalist who wrote those false stories for the New York Times, the same issue came up. These are also the days when the US cum CIA are beginning (or more accurately finessing) their cooperation with the Fascist ethnic cleansing of the Krajina, the biggest single such act since the last world war!

But this report in very short measure lays bare the whole truthful mechanism of where this Srebrenica Hoax story was constructed step by step.

Armed as we are with that evidence that Clinton and Izetbegovic hatched the idea of a Massacre of 5000 Muslims by the Serbs in taking Srebrenica long before…we can see this being put in place in these two devastating paragraphs. Sure there are plenty more details to come but essentially it is all here.

As we mentioned above the investigator Salvisberg features highly and i think positively, in the sense of honestly

Salvisberg’s team initially took a random approach, with evaluations taking place each day, after which the work became more systematic. The investigators chose a gentle, passive approach. They asked who wanted to talk to them, and then interviewed these people.

According to Salvisberg they were not after ‘sexy stories like the ones in the press’.[10] A total of five women came forward who said they had been raped. In general the stories of those who had been transported away in buses were relatively ‘uneventful’. They had experienced few incidents. A picture gradually emerged, but the main question was whether the reported executions were isolated incidents or indications of a widespread phenomenon. It was also very difficult to gain a picture of the number who had been executed, but things certainly gave cause for concern, according to the investigator Peggy Hicks of the Human Rights Office of Civil Affairs in Zagreb.[11]

After about a week the investigators of the two UN organizations noticed that their respondents had been told what to say; they suspected that these instructions came from the Bosnian authorities. The gist of these prompted stories was that the Serbs and the UN (not specifically the Dutch) had been the bad guys, who had ‘sold out’ the people of the enclave. At this time Salvisberg had not yet heard any criticism of the actions of the people’s own Muslim soldiers. It was to be some days before the first stories emerged which also assigned blame to the Bosnian government.[12]


Do I have to comment on that? I do not think so! Their problem was that they were talking to people who had been told what to say. If that is not the framework for creating a massacre myth I do not know what is. The coaching that was going on in Tuzla by what was essenmtially The Muslim Brotherhood, being aided and abetted by “The West” was colossal! Will return to this. Seems the central point.



After a few days the team of investigators started looking for men who had entered the Safe Areas following the march. They visited a camp full of soldiers outside Tuzla. This proved a difficult affair: the authority of T. Mazowiecki, the Special Rapporteur for Human Rights who arrived in Tuzla on 22 July, was required to facilitate this visit. This solved only part of the problem: the interviewers were not permitted to approach people themselves but were ‘accompanied’ by the Muslim authorities. ‘They were presented to us’, reported the investigator Hicks. This was supposedly to save the investigators’ time. ‘It made me feel very uneasy’, said Hicks later[13]

Other investigators shared her experience. According to R. (Roman) Wieruszewski of the UNCHR office in Sarajevo, one of the consequences of this ‘accompaniment’ was that everyone with whom he and his colleagues spoke claimed that he had been unarmed. In later interviews conducted independently of the authorities the interviewees generally declared that of course they had carried weapons, otherwise they would not have survived the march.[14] Sometimes it was women who said that of course the soldiers had been armed. Salvisberg recounted: ‘They even laughed at us when we asked about this.’ He and the other researchers calculated that of the Muslim men, about one-third had been armed and about two-thirds had been unarmed. They gained the impression that there had been an element of organization in the distribution of the available weapons: ‘You get one, you don’t’, which according to them led to conflicts. Other Displaced Persons reported fights between the Muslim soldiers. There were also reports that Bosnian Muslims had executed Serbs.

The impression gained by the research team was that the soldiers had several prepared standard stories, such as a mass murder of 25 people conducted by the Bosnian Serbs, in which the respondent kept under cover or pretended to be dead.

‘We heard this story ten times or so’, said Salvisberg.[15]

Although the reconstruction of the march presented problems, the biggest problem proved to be establishing what had happened to the group in Srebrenica and Potocari.[16]

Again comment by me on the above would be superfluous. but we return again to this investigator lady called Hicks

In the first report sent by Hicks on 21 July, she nonetheless concluded that there was sufficient basis ‘to believe that significant human rights violations occurred both before and during the transport from Srebrenica’.[17] Much remained unclear, however.

In the final report finished by Hicks on 31 July, the issue of numbers remained open. She could do nothing else than to conclude that further investigations were required.[18]

It was only in October 1995, following new revelations in the press, that even she realized what the probable scale of the murder had been.[19]


That is amazing. But I do find the way that the Report reports on this woman Hicks to be totally revealing, and the more we go along, alarming


First report by Hicks on 21 July Hicks is saying that she thinks there have been human rights abuses…she is of course looking for Serb soldiers murdering Muslims, which is what she is all about


She thinks! That is all she can say.


By her second report on 31 July she says she knows nothing, basically. Cannot put a number down. Needs further investigations etc..


This is after hundreds and hundreds of interviews with the civilians in Tuzla bussed from Srebrenica, conducted by her and colleagues in those vital fresh after the event couple of weeks.


It was only in October, and following the Media stories, that she began to talk numbers. So that was about 3 months, and she had had full access to all those Muslim participants in Srebrenica. In Tuzla.


Let us look at a few additional and very interesting things in the above

The Muslims of Izetbegovic were promoting the Massacre story following the blueprint (we deal with this separately…it is amazing) laid down by Clinton and Izetbegovic that the Serbs must “do” a massacre of at least 5000 (!) (New World Order wants, New World Order gets!) in order to sway American opinion for the US to bomb the Bosnian Serbs. So if there was a massacre by the Serbs of Muslims, then hell open up and show the world!

1. In that case would you not expect free access

2. So why were the Islamist watchers always watching over what the soldiers said

3. The Muslim leaders never allowed free access to the investigators…those to be questioned were always presented and in controlled conditions. The thought (as the Muslim leaders claimed) that they were doing this to help the investigators, make thing flow more smoothly, is a good example of Takkiya (Islamist lies or Islamic deception permitted in the cause)



Let us look at the evidence coming out about a massacre and executions and how Hicks reacted rather strangely

1.      ‘They were presented to us’, reported the investigator Hicks. This was supposedly to save the investigators’ time. ‘It made me feel very uneasy’, said Hicks later.

2.      Anything else making her uneasy? Well, just this little detail might make any investigator feel uneasy:  “The impression gained by the research team was that the soldiers had several prepared standard stories, such as a mass murder of 25 people conducted by the Bosnian Serbs, in which the respondent kept under cover or pretended to be dead. ‘We heard this story ten times or so’, said Salvisberg”.

3.      Meaning according to them at least on 10 different times, maybe more, 10 different Muslim soldiers reported that a batch of 25 were shot, and each time the character (lucky devil) crawled out when the coast was clear and made his way to Tuzla to tell his story, and his, and his, and his etc etc. The response of any sane investigator to this might be “What a f…ing concoction”

4.      Yet Hicks as I have pointed out does not write up any of this when she comes to report but she joins in the Islamist lie machine: In the first report sent by Hicks on 21 July, she nonetheless concluded that there was sufficient basis ‘to believe that significant human rights violations occurred both before and during the transport from Srebrenica’. BUT INSIDE A WEEK OR SO HAD PULLED BACK FROM THAT ASSERTION. SHE HAD NO EVIDENCE FROM ALL THOSE INTERVIEWS.


This fairly caught my eye but like much else in this Dutch report it is mentioned in passing and there is no examination of the implications.

So consider again the following:

“After a few days the team of investigators started looking for men who had entered the Safe Areas following the march. They visited a camp full of soldiers outside Tuzla. This proved a difficult affair: the authority of T. Mazowiecki, the Special Rapporteur for Human Rights who arrived in Tuzla on 22 July, was required to facilitate this visit.”

I remember a pop song of about 20 years ago. It was about a guy who was “living next door to Alice” for about 20 years and all about his angst. Anyway it was re-cut and interposed at regular intervals with a comical scream “Who the F…k is Alice!”

And here I felt like screaming “Who the f..k is T. Mazowieki”.


This Special Rapporteur for Human Rights was the only one who could get the investigators in to talk to the Muslim Jihadist and close to Nasir Oric soldiers from Srebrenica.

The report tells us nothing. Does not even raise an eyebrow at this but it cries out for an explanation.

I would want to know everything about this “Human Rights” guy, and as somebody with obvious sway with the Izetbegovic crowd, what on earth was he doing investigating the Serbs committing war crimes!



So it appears that Mazowiecki had something that no other investigator had. He had the magical ability (what a man!) to gain entrance for the investigating group into the Muslim soldier’s camp. There the investigators could talk to the soldiers if the soldiers had somebody from the Muslim side (Islamist leadership) watching.

After that then why am I not so very surprised at all that this then happened


After a few days the team of investigators started looking for men who had entered the Safe Areas following the march. They visited a camp full of soldiers outside Tuzla. This proved a difficult affair: the authority of T. Mazowiecki, the Special Rapporteur for Human Rights who arrived in Tuzla on 22 July, was required to facilitate this visit.


Followed by these conflicting reports:

Typical of the problems in defining the events shortly after the fall were the statements made by two high-ranking UN officials in Tuzla. The Peruvian diplomat H. Wieland, the highest official of the UN Centre for Human Rights in the region, said on 23 July that ‘we have not found anyone who saw with their own eyes an atrocity taking place’.[20] On the same day, however, the Special Rapporteur for human rights, Tadeus Mazowiecki, also declared in Tuzla that ‘barbaric’ acts had taken place


Either one of these two is lying. Which do you believe? Do you believe the UN guy from Peru? Or do you believe the Human Rights guy who has a special relationship with Islamofascist Izetbegovic?

No. please don’t answer! I am just teasing!

Even to a 9 year old it is a no brainer! The “Special Reporteur of Human Rights, Tadeus Mazowiecki, smelled to high heaven and was working on an agenda, I would say from the evidence along with Hicks, that did not have truth as a priority.

And there you have the quandary that the Serbs were in. No matter the evidence, or total lack of evidence, the Hicks and Mazowieckis of this world were going to knife them anyway.



Hicks and Mazowiecki were obviously working to a script. But let us not overlook the role of the mass media.

We will deal with this separately since it is so huge. But let me just say that in recent days (I was writing in 2008) I have went through the past files of the Irish newspaper of record, the Irish Times. There are many hundreds of major articles on the Irish Times, all paid for by The Irish Times. All support the thesis, and there are no exceptions to this, that the Serbs massacred 8000 men and boys on taking the town. They are as crude as that. There are no exceptions and not one doubt or question raised. Peter Maher has done much more work than i was capable of on this very issue…the DELAY…

Swiss investigator R Salvisberg referred to precisely this same issue of journalist lies in the report:


[begin quote here]

There were other problems too. The investigation was considerably hindered by the journalists present. Anyone could walk in and out of the relief camps. According to the Swiss investigator R. Salvisberg, UNCHR Bosnia coordinator based in Sarajevo, the journalists encouraged the Displaced Persons to say what they wanted to hear. In his eyes the media were engaged in ‘a sensational hunt’ for the worst crime, and this would then be published in the papers. As a result Salvisberg and his colleagues were constantly working in the wake of newspaper headlines and television sound-bites (however strange it sounds, televisions were soon present in the camp too).[8] The investigators noticed in the process that the journalists were strongly focused on Dutchbat. This possible distortion made it difficult to discern what the Displaced Persons had experienced themselves and what they were repeating from other sources.

[end quote here]


The situation in this camp of those Muslims who had been bussed by the Serbs from Srebrenica to Tuzla, which was a safe area for the Muslims controlled by the Muslim Government. This was a Civil War situation and far from creating a massacre the Serbs were being kind and looking after “civilians”.

It soon became clear that these “civilians” were part of the war on the Serbs, part of the Jihad against the Serbs and the Orthodox religion. This is not surprising if you remove the lies. From precisely this area of Srebrenica Nasir Oric had ruled supreme and was hailed as a hero by precisely these “civilians”.

From this base Nasir Oric organized the murder of 3800 ordinary Serb peasant men women and children in the years from 1992 to 1995 and this must indeed have been common knowledge in such a confined and confessional area as was Islamist Srebrenica.

I have no doubt that when General Mladic arrived with buses and safe transport these “civilians” were mightily relieved.

Once ensconced in Tuzla they began to pay back this Serb kindness and sense of following Geneva Rules by teaming up with the Media and promoting the worst slanders against the Serbs as a people. I am not saying every Muslim civilian did this but a goodly number must have.

Swiss man Salvisberg who was present and in close touch as an investigator with what was happening was very aware of these lies being promoted by the Media and by these “civilians”. I place in parenthesis because it is obvious that the division between civilian and soldier in modern war is much overestimated.

He refers to as: “‘a sensational hunt’ for the worst crime, and this would then be published in the papers. As a result Salvisberg and his colleagues were constantly working in the wake of newspaper headlines and television sound-bites (however strange it sounds, televisions were soon present in the camp too”.

This was a shark feeding frenzy and the victim in this case was all things Serb.

In fact to use the shark analogy does a disservice to sharks which kill only to live as part of nature. 



The material in the report dealing with Dutch ruling class bourgeois politicians like Plonk is a real eye-opener.

It is dealt with in extreme detail in the report. Let me put it simply.

These EU type politicians like Plonk were filled with hatred against Milosevic and the Serbs. For much the same reason that they are filled with hatred against the Jews of Israel.

It concerns nation. Every one of these EU political classes has sold out their national rights for economic gain, to be part of the reactionary EU cartel, which discriminates against the poor of Adrica, Asia and China. It discriminates also against the US but as a giant power it is able to look after its own interests.

They hate the Serbs and the Jews for various reasons, communism, orthodoxy, Judaism, but the deeper reason concerns nationality. The Serbs and the Jews of Israel are not about to surrender their nationality no matter what monetary temptations are brandished. True they have their quislings, but the battle on that front is not yet played out.

Please read carefully all of the report re a Dutch politician called Plonk and his associate bourgeois EU political types. You will notice that when Plonk visited the area he made a bee line for the Muslims from Srebrenica and he talked only with them, and with other EU types hanging around Srebrenica. Plonk was a dhimmi and was entering into a relationship precisely with Islam.

Note that on his visit to Tuzla that Plonk never did talk to his own countrymen in the UN force. Now is that not indeed remarkable. For an unbiased account of what happened in Srebrenica would you not think that would be the first port of call?

But the Dutch UN soldiers were always singing from a different hymn sheet than Plonk. They were saying that there was something very dubious about the way that the Islamist army operated. Questions like “Why did they clear out and surrender without a fight”

And then stories about “massacre appeared. The soldiers had seen nothing of this.

This contradicts totally the US, EU and Islamist line. But if Plonk on the other hand had travelled across to Yugoslavia in order to pin a war crime on the Serbs, for whatever reason, then it becomes a little more understandable.

If it was war crime against the Serbs Plonk was after then the very last people he would speak to would be his own soldiers, his own countrymen. After all they were unbiased.

It seems reasonable then to conclude that Plonk wished to evade talking to his own Dutch soldiers at all costs. Looking for the war crime against the Serbs he made a beeline to that Media shark feeding frenzy in the Muslim camp (Once again apologies to sharks)

Was he doing this for ambition and self-interest? We are talking about a particularly low form of animal life here. Blair and Bush lie to the world to make war in Iraq. Milliband at the first opportunity stabs Brown in the back in order to attain the stinking job of British PM. Let us not be too severe on Plonk. Pity perhaps is more in order.

But Plonk and his colleague Voerhoeve (who also comes into the picture as the Dutch Report saw it) did go across to do a job on the Serbs and up to now succeeded because the Srebrenica Hoax took off like the proverbial rocket.

The Report draws this all out admirably and only somebody really blind could not spot it.

Consider the wealth of detail in the following when Voerhoeve visited England with Srebrenica on his mind:

[begin quote here]

On 21 July he had attended the international Bosnia Conference in London. He had an informal meeting with General Smith, who informed him confidentially that he feared the worst for the men still missing, even if hard proof was still lacking: ‘He was the first from the military sector who told me informally, “I think they’ve murdered two to three thousand men.” I don’t know how he knew it, but he also said, “I don’t have any hard facts, but things aren’t right. There are too many men missing.” That was on 21 July. He also said, “I don’t precisely know why I’m saying this, but it’s my feeling, intuition”.’[26] Strengthened by this information and the knowledge that Dutchbat had now left the Republika Srpska, Voerhoeve then issued strong accusations directed at the Bosnian Serbs: ‘Genocide means murder of a group, and that is what the Bosnian Serbs are doing’.[27] In the NOS television news of that evening he explained his words further:

‘We now no longer have any constraints on the things we can say. We know that very serious things have happened in Srebrenica. We don’t have the full picture yet, but I fear that hundreds if not thousands have died. There’s no longer any need to keep our voices down. We know that very serious things have happened and we also want them fully investigated on behalf of the Tribunal that is to investigate war crimes. I believe that serious war crimes have indeed taken place.’[28]

The reactions of some Dutchbat personnel to these statements were so fierce that a rather nonplussed Voerhoeve had to back-pedal

Etc etc

[end quote here]


So we note

1.      Always the Brits. Always the perfidy of Albion raises its stinking carcass in every world situation. Smith has no evidence. This Dutch political assassin Voerhoeve knows that Smith has no evidence but such is their hatred of the Serbs they concoct a story anyway

2.      And the guts of this evidence that Smith gave to idiot Voerhoeve ran along the lines of “I don’t know how he knew it, but he also said, “I don’t have any hard facts, but things aren’t right”

And of course it was without any hard soft or in between kind of facts that the whole Srebrenica Massacre hoax was raised.

It makes me wonder are we really talking here about a Massacre or are we talking about something rather different. Is it not the complete breakdown of human law and human values that is at stake in this discussion. A move towards Fascist forms of rule such as was experienced as the Nazis took power. It is not a repeat. History never repeats itself precisely.

But it is clear that Smith has no evidence (he says so), Plonk had no unbiased evidence (as we have showed), Voerhoeve has no evidence (he also says so and states that Smith tells him clearly that he has no evidence)


And yet this Hoax story took off to such an extent that in hundreds and hundreds of major articles in the Irish newspaper of Record “The Irish Times” since 1995 not one does other than accept totally the Srebrenica Massacre story.

Surely must be a new low for the human race


The points made by Peter Mayer about the delay in this whole story of a “massacre” is the strangest thing of all.

I believe that it took time to put together the “evidence” for the massacre, and that the World Media which had/has a visceral hatred for the Serb people had a big hand in the manufacture of these stories

This famous Dutch Report was written by reserved and super respectable people, good bourgeois gentlemen as Engels would have called them

But their evidence in this Report is very revealing

It is also very revealing that this Report has been attacked more and more as the evidence that there was a massacre by the Serbs becomes ever more questioned

Out of it all i draw forward two facts. First is the delay, second is the nature of the pounding which the people of the world have received from the Media over this (false) story

We live in very peculiar times, when technology has allowed the creation of a lie on a gigantic scale.

But not everybody has been taken in by the Lie. I think that 4international has got a proud heritage in that regard. We will always stand witht he Jews and Serbs against Lies.


4international is going to have another look at this so called “Srebrenica Massacre”. We reprint this article to get the ball rolling, but this is only the start. I am prepared to give credit where credit is due but also to be critical of everything written.

I will add my comments to this article later. I am looking closely at the end of the article which seems to be devoid of revolutionary strategy and tactics as to how to fight the NATO/JIHAD alliance


Srebrenica: Bosnian Muslim Jihad killings of 3,500 Christians

Jun 12, 2011

By Lee Jay Walker from Modern Tokyo Times |


The image of Srebrenica tells us more about the reality of the majority of the media and of course the “Muslim victim card” is being used in order to cleanse the Bosniak Muslims. After all, from enslaving Orthodox Christians during their brotherly love with the Turkish slave masters of the Ottoman Empire to having Muslim SS units who supported Adolf Hitler; then “victimhood” is needed in order to justify their history and culture.
Of course the wishy-washy brigade will tell us that the Ottoman period was enlightened and that the system of taking the eldest Christian boy (devshirme system) in the Balkans and converting them to Islam was noble.  Yes, slavery in the modern era being justified and not mere slavery because the system meant that they would kill their own people in the name of Islam after being indoctrinated by Islamists in the Ottoman Empire.

Bosnian Muslim government Jihad forcesBosnian Muslim government Jihad forces

However, the liberal agenda tells us that Europe owes so much to Islam.  Strange because Islam took the sword to Europe and enslaved and colonized and this reality shames historians and commentators who manipulate history.  After all, if people stated that the Atlantic slave trade was enlightening then people would be rightly condemned. However, when scholars and journalist speak about a tolerant Islamic Ottoman Empire or about their man made multi-religious Bosnia then the elites clap in admiration while leaders in Mecca dream about Islamization by stealth jihad.
Of course even the Atlantic trade route is also manipulated because little is said about the Arab and Turkish enslavement of Africa, Asia, and Eastern Europe.  These tens of millions of slaves do not count and it would not suit the agenda to mention white slaves and Hindu slaves.
The Orthodox Christian world along with Africa and the Hindu world suffered so much at the hands of Islamic slavery and Protestant and Catholic imperialism which also enslaved.  This reality is forgotten and it appears that even in recent times that Orthodox Christians and Hindus do not count.
After all, three wars in the Balkans since the 1970s in Bosnia, Cyprus and Kosovo and every time the West supported Islam. Also, the Turkish genocide which killed millions of Armenians, Assyrians, and Greeks, is still not recognized despite several million Christians being slaughtered in 1915 and the following years (major pogroms took place also before this date).
Similarly, the de-Hinduization of Kashmir, Bangladesh and Pakistan does not seem to hit the headlines in modern times.  Therefore, while the Muslim population remains strong in India and is growing the Hindus of Bangladesh, Kashmir and Pakistan are in free fall in percentage terms.
Alas, it appears that Orthodox Christians and Hindus don’t count!
Turning back to Srebrenica and the reality or unreality of what really happened.  After all, Bosnian Muslims have to justify their past misdeeds and Western powers need to justify killing from the air during the bombing of Serbia.
You see, when NATO bombing attacks against mainly civilians took place in Serbia this was deemed to be “Western civilization.” Yes, the overwhelming majority of people killed were not military fighters in the army of Serbia but were civilians and bombing hospitals, the infrastructure and so forth was all justified in the name of “Western civilization.”
Strange, because when several million Africans who were mainly Christian or Animist were being killed in Southern Sudan by the Arab Muslim regime then nothing was done.  Therefore, “the double standards” or should I say “no standards” was at work once more and the twisting of history and reality was done in order to suit an agenda.
The House of Saud must have been so pleased with both events.  After all, kill millions of African Christians and Animists in Sudan in order to Arabize and Islamize and the West does nothing.  At the same time create two Islamic dominated states in Europe with Kosovo being accomplished and Bosnia being the future hope after the enforced demise of the Bosnian Serb Republic. 
This is where Srebrenica suits the agenda in order to cover-up all the misdeeds of past history and this applies to Bosniak Muslim history and the Western bombing of Serbia which enabled a body organ transplanting leadership to take power.
Before going deeper into what happened in Srebrenica it is important to clarify that thousands of Muslims were killed after Bosnian Serbian forces took Srebrenica.  This applies to not only Muslim soldiers who were killed but also innocent Muslims who were also killed during the mayhem of events. 

Srdja Trifkovic, who is an historian, foreign affairs analyst and respected author, states the following:
“During the Bosnian war between May 1992 and July 1995, several thousand Muslim men lost their lives in Srebrenica and its surroundings. Most of them died in July of 1995 when the enclave fell unexpectedly to the Bosnian Serb Army and the Muslim garrison attempted a breakthrough. Some escaped to the Muslim-held town of Tuzla, 38 miles to the north. Many were killed while fighting their way through; and many others were taken prisoner and executed by the Bosnian Serb army.”
Srdja Trifkovic continues by stating that “It is often pointed out that Srebrenica was an UN “protected zone,” but it is seldom noted that the enclave was simultaneously an armed camp used for attacks against Serb villages in the surrounding areas. Muslim General Sefer Halilovic confirmed in his testimony at the Hague Tribunal that there were at least 5,500 Bosnian Army soldiers in Srebrenica after it had obtained the “safe haven” status, and that he had personally arranged numerous deliveries of sophisticated weapons by helicopter.”
This statement is important because the Muslim General, Sefer Halilovic, confirms that you had at least 5,500 Bosnian Muslim Army soldiers in Srebrenica.  More important, these fighters had slaughtered more than 3,500 Christians prior to the fall of Srebrenica and this applies to young children, women and the elderly in surrounding villages.
Even worse, the so-called safe haven meant that Bosnian Muslim forces would attack outside of the main area of central Srebenica and kill Orthodox Christians. However, they would then return to Srebrenica in order to be protected and to re-enforce their stronghold and this applies to re-arming and so forth.  
The UNPROFOR commander, French General Philippe Morillon, testified that the crimes committed by Bosnian Muslim forces were “extraordinary” and made the Serbs’ desire for revenge to be “inevitable.”
Philippe Morillon clearly stated the name of the Bosnian Muslim commander Naser Oric who was known for being sadistic.  On February 12 in 2004 at The Hague Tribunal Philippe Morillon testified that Bosnian Muslim forces under Naser Oric “engaged in attacks during Orthodox (Christian) holidays and destroyed villages, massacring all the inhabitants. This created a degree of hatred that was quite extraordinary in the region.”
Philippe Morillon is clearly commenting about the massacres of thousands of Orthodox Christians who were killed in the surrounding region.  This applies to Christians being burnt alive, beheaded and so forth.
This Srebrenica is about two military forces being the Orthodox Bosnian Christian Serb forces and the Bosnian Muslim forces.  Therefore, the real Srebrenica is very different and if General Ratko Mladic did not have Bosnian Serb units in the region to stem the massacre of Orthodox Christians then the figure of 3,500 deaths would have been even higher.
Also, from a military point of view the Bihac Muslims in Western Bosnia under Fikret Abdic had supported the Bosnian Serbs but in time they would be crushed by Bosnian Muslim forces under the Islamist, Alija Izetbegovic. At the same time during the civil war in Croatia the Krajina Serbs would be forced out and many innocent Orthodox Christians would be killed and “cleansed.”
Srebrenica was part of a bigger battle and little is said about Serbian Christian areas in Sarajevo which were taken by Islamist military forces under Alija Izetbegovic. Therefore, not only had Srebrenica Muslim forces killed and slaughtered thousands of innocent Orthodox Christians in the surrounding region; but their brutality and numbers of more than 5,500 military Muslim soldiers meant that Bosnian Serb units were being pinned down.
It was a situation that was leading to vented up hanger and hatred.  After all, why wasn’t Krajina a protected area for Orthodox Christian Serbs and the same applies to Bihac where Muslims were moderate and wanted protection from Bosnian Islamist forces under Alija Izetbegovic….why weren’t these areas protected?
In fact, not only were the protected safe havens biased towards the Muslims who supported the Islamist Alija Izetbegovic; but at the same time thousands of international Islamists were allowed to enter Bosnia in order to slit the throats of Orthodox Christians and Catholic Christians because to international Islamists the war had a different meaning because it was an Islamic Jihad in their eyes.
Not only this, Bill Clinton who supported the Islamists who were given tacit approval to slaughter Orthodox Christians had a double agenda.  This applies to allowing thousands of international Islamists into Bosnia and at the same time to build up both Croatian Catholic units and the Bosnian Muslim Islamist leadership of Alija Izetbegovic.
Time was not on the side of the Bosnian Christian Serbs and in this sense General Ratko Mladic is being tried in the courts of The Hague because he had held out against a huge united and international agenda.  Indeed, for the Bosnian Serbs to have held out and maintain a vast area of Bosnia is remarkable given the fact that America, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and many others, alongside international Islamists like Al Qaeda, had all worked together in order to defeat the Bosnian Serbs.
Major-General (Ret) Lewis Mackenzie who is a retired Canadian general also raises serious doubts about so-called “good” and “evil.” In his article called
“The real story behind Srebrenica.  The massacre in the UN ‘safe haven’ was not a black and white event,” which was published in The Globe and Mail (July 14, 2005), he clearly highlights neglected areas.
Major General (Ret) Lewis MacKenzie states the following:
“As the Bosnian Muslim fighters became better equipped and trained, they started to venture outside Srebrenica, burning Serb villages and killing their occupants before quickly withdrawing to the security provided by the UN’s safe haven. These attacks reached a crescendo in 1994 and carried on into early 1995 after the Canadian infantry company that had been there for a year was replaced by a larger Dutch contingent.”
“The Bosnian Serbs might have had the heaviest weapons, but the Bosnian Muslims matched them in infantry skills that were much in demand in the rugged terrain around Srebrenica. As the snow cleared in the spring of 1995, it became obvious to Nasar Oric, the man who led the Bosnian Muslim fighters that the Bosnian Serb army was going to attack Srebrenica to stop him from attacking Serb villages. So he and a large number of his fighters slipped out of town. Srebrenica was left undefended with the strategic thought that, if the Serbs attacked an undefended town, surely that would cause NATO and the UN to agree that NATO air strikes against the Serbs were justified. And so the Bosnian Serb army strolled into Srebrenica without opposition.”
General Morillon bluntly states that “Naser Oric was a warlord who reigned by terror in his area and over the population itself. I think that he realized that these were the rules of this horrific war, that he could not allow himself to take prisoners. According to my recollection, he didn’t even look for an excuse. It was simply a statement: One can’t be bothered with prisoners.”
Morillon also recounts how “the Serbs took me to a village to show me the evacuation of the bodies of the inhabitants that had been thrown into a hole, a village close to Bratunac. And this made me understand the degree to which this infernal situation of blood and vengeance […] led to a situation when I personally feared that the worst would happen if the Serbs of Bosnia managed to enter the enclaves and Srebrenica.”
“I feared that the Serbs, the local Serbs, the Serbs of Bratunac, these militiamen, they wanted to take their revenge for everything that they attributed to Naser Oric. It wasn’t just Naser Oric that they wanted to revenge, take their revenge on; they wanted to revenge their dead on Orthodox Christmas.”
It is clear that the Bosnian Muslim forces and Srebrenica is not the “innocent Muslim lamb” which is being told; on the contrary “Srebrenica was a fortified Islamic stronghold which butchered and slaughtered innocent Orthodox Christians in the surrounding region.”
Also, events on the ground were changing rapidly and this applies to Bihac, Mostar, Krajina and many parts of Bosnia and Croatia. In the ensuing mayhem massacres on all sides took place and in Bihac it was local Muslims who were killed by Islamic forces which supported Alija Izetbegovic.
Indeed, it is strange that Alija Izetbegovic and Muslim units cared so much about crushing the moderate Muslims of Bihac when it was claimed that they were overstretched and facing genocide.  However, this is a different issue but interesting all the same because it shows you the limitations of many journalists who followed the “Islamist Alija Izetbegovic party line” and it shatters the myth because Serbian forces had helped the Muslims of Bihac.
Lord Owen also vindicates what General Morillon stated because on page 143 of his book, Balkan Odyssey, the respected Lord Owen comments that “On 16 April I spoke on the telephone to President Milosevic about my anxiety that, despite repeated assurances from Dr. Karadzic that he had no intention of taking Srebrenica, the Bosnian Serb army was now proceeding to do just that. The pocket was greatly reduced in size. I had rarely heard Milosevic so exasperated, but also so worried: he feared that if the Bosnian Serb troops entered Srebrenica there would be a bloodbath because of the tremendous bad blood that existed between the two armies. The Bosnian Serbs held the young Muslim commander in Srebrenica, Naser Oric, responsible for a massacre near Bratunac in December 1992 in which many Serb civilians had been killed. Milosevic believed it would be a great mistake for the Bosnian Serbs to take Srebrenica and promised to tell Karadzic so.”
In a past article I state that “I have given quotes from people who were on the ground and from people who know a lot about the real events of Bosnia and Srebrenica.  It would be difficult to claim that Lord Owen, General Morillon, and Lewis MacKenzie, are pro-Serbian or that they are holocaust deniers.”
“Therefore, it is clear that “the real Srebrenica” is not being told and the same applies to the “hidden Islamic jihad” which took place during the civil war and how ex-President Bill Clinton gave the green light to Islamists from all over the world to enter Bosnia.”
Srebrenica should be remembered but it should be remembered in its duality and this applies to thousands of innocent Orthodox Christians and Muslims who were killed by both sides.  It also should be remembered that Bosnian Muslim forces had slaughtered thousands of Christians first in the surrounding region of Srebrenica and that the “safe haven” was abused and generals from the international community who were on the ground state this clearly and Morillon testified in court.
Lewis MacKenzie comments that “two wrongs never made a right, but those moments in history that shame us all because of our indifference should not be viewed in isolation without the context that created them.”
With this powerful comment in mind and the complex nature of Bosnia and Croatia and the inner-struggle between the Muslim community in Bihac against the Islamist Alija Izetbegovic; alongside the international Islamist movement and Al Qaeda being involved; and the arming of Bosnian Muslim forces and Croatia by America, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and others. Then Srebrenica can’t be talked about by one single event because what happened before and the complexity of the civil wars means that the entire picture must be seen and the “evil and hatred” which existed was based on events prior to Bosnian Serb forces entering Srebrenica. 
In all civil wars you have massacres and no side is innocent and anybody who says differently is biased to the extreme.  If you view Hiroshima and Nagasaki and ignore events prior to this and the carpet bombing of Germany and Japan where millions were killed; then all the massacres which took place by Germany and Japan will not be viewed and in isolation you have a mass distortion of reality.
This is what is happening about Srebrenica; a huge distortion of reality and past events are being ignored and manipulated to an extreme point of view and which is anti-Serbian. 
Ratko Mladic from a Bosnian Serb point of view held out against multiple forces and this applies to the Bosnian Muslim forces, Catholic Croatian forces, international Islamists and nations like America, Iran, and Saudi Arabia who were re-arming the Croatians and Bosnian Muslim forces who supported Alija Izetbegovic.
If genuine healing is to take place or if the truth counts for anything; then Srebrenica should be remembered for the fallen on all sides.
It is not good enough to say that the deaths of more than 3,500 Orthodox Christians don’t count and to ignore the fact that the main massacres which took place in the region had been started by Bosnian Muslim forces.
A joint memorial would indicate that both sides killed innocents in and surrounding Srebrenica.  The massacre of innocent Christians and Muslims is a fact but the “Muslim victim card” and the “international community” desire to “cleanse their role in Srebrenica.”


U.S. Government Cheers As Turkey Goes Islamist and Anti-American


Will 250 million people live under revolutionary Islamist regimes by the end of this year?

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gives a “high-five” to Turkey’s Foreign Minister Ahmed Davuto

Davuto authored a Turkish foreign policy designed to align an Islamist Turkey with the Islamic world and turn against America and the West. So here’s the key figure in aligning Turkey with Iran, Syria, Hamas, and Hizballah, yet that’s no problem for Clinton, laughing it up with one of America’s most dangerous  enemies

By Barry Rubin, RubinReports

On Sunday, June 12, Turkey will hold what might well be its most important elections in modern history.

(In fact Erdogan has won, with a decisive majority in Parliament, and although he lacks the “super majority” to go to the country directly in referenda things look very bad, as the following statement on BBC News shows:

In his victory speech, Mr Erdogan also alluded to Turkey’s aspiration to be a voice in the West for the Middle Eastern region and Muslims, saying Bosnians, Lebanese, Syrians and Palestinians also benefited from his victory.

“Believe me, Sarajevo won today as much as Istanbul, Beirut won as much as Izmir, Damascus won as much as Ankara, Ramallah, Nablus, Jenin, the West Bank, Jerusalem won as much as Diyarbakir.”

More than 50 million people, about two-thirds of Turkey’s population of 73 million, were eligible to vote in Sunday’s election. NTV television said turnout was 84.5%.

The newspaper Today’s Zaman said there would be a record 78 female MPs – up from 50 in the last parliament.)

This means the rest of this analysis by Barry Rubin is very relevant. Take note of the above reference to Bosnia and to the “Palestinians”.

(Continue the Barry Rubin analysis here)

It may also be the worst thing that’s happened to the country in modern history. If the current regime is reelected—and it could do so, given Turkey’s electoral system, with less than thirty percent of the vote, the emboldened Islamist regime will hit the accelerator in transforming Turkey into as much of an Islamist state as possible.

(Erdogan hitting the accelerator against Israel, against the Serbs, we await that therefore after this election…FQ)

The ruling AK Party has been cautious, concealing its aims and pretending to be a “center-right” reform party. Many Turks have also accepted this notion. Roughly only 12 percent want an Islamist state and around 30 percent will also vote for the current regime in the belief that it won’t give that to them.

Yet as the AK has entrenched itself in power, put its cadre into institutions, undermined democracy, and paid virtually no international cost for doing so it has become more confident. One might better say, arrogant. This election could well be the last straw pushing Turkey over the edge of the cliff.

Whether or not anyone in the U.S. government recognizes it now, that development will spell the end of a U.S.-Turkish alliance that has endured 55 years. Turkey, arguably the Muslim-majority country with the most advanced infrastructure and greatest military capability in the world, will be in the enemy camp.

Already, the Turkey-Israel alliance is long over and will not return under this regime in Ankara. The Turkish government supports Iran, Syria, Hamas, and Hizballah. The regime officially sponsors antisemitic hatred. The hatred of the regime for Israel and Jews is pathological. Nothing like it has been seen in Turkey during all of the centuries since the Turks arrived in Anatolia. Many Jews are leaving or are getting prepared to do so.

If the regime gets a big enough majority it will rewrite the Turkish constitution.

Turkey, as we have known it, a secular democratic state since the 1920s, will no longer exist. Of course, not everything will be obvious and happen overnight, but the repression we have already seen will increase. The courts, the armed forces, and other institutions will be taken over by this Islamist government.

It will be a disaster for Western interests. And coupled with the same thing happening in Egypt, these events will catapult the region back a half-century or more into strife.

Meanwhile, the West snores on. Western media coverage of the Turkish regime is glowing. Yet if one actually looks at what’s happening in the country, reading the Turkish-language media and talking to the many Turks horrified by these developments, the picture is horrifying.

Here is an example of life in contemporary Turkey. The town of Hopa received a visit from Prime Minister Erdogan. Opposition banners are removed by the police. When local people resisted, the police attacked. A retired teacher who had been trying to negotiate with the police died.

Scores of journalists have been arrested and thrown into jail. One-third of the media has been bought up by the regime; much of the rest intimidated. Military officers, college professors, union leaders, activists, and peaceful critics of every description are thrown into jail on trumped up charges and kept there for months, years. The waiting time for a trial during which people are jailed is now three years. Yes, three years without proof of any wrongdoing.

A respected investigative journalist is arrested and accused of terrorism. His crime? Writing a critical book on Fathi Gulen, Turkey’s leading Islamist cleric. All of the copies of the manuscript are confiscated. Gulen controls the police.

Two other journalists are arrested. Their crime? Saying that they were about to publish documentation showing that the government’s claims of conspiracy, used to arrest so many, are bogus. Gareth Jenkins, a serious scholar, has gone through thousands of pages of court documents and shown that the hundreds of people imprisoned have not even been accused of any specific act. I know of a half-dozen journalists fired for daring to criticize the government. There are many more.

How to intimidate the media? Tax officials arrive and take over offices, going through all of the documents trying to find some technicality on which to bring charges. The largest media group in Turkey, the Dogan Group, was told that it owed $2.5 billion in penalties. That is not a typographical error. It is several times the worth of the entire company. The government demanded that they pay the fines first and then if they wanted they could go to court. To provide a partial payment and bank guarantees, the Dogan Group had to sell two newspapers.

People feel that they are watched, wire-tapped, and spied on. Turkey was never a perfect democracy. Yet this atmosphere is closer to that of a country under Communism than the Turkey they have known all their lives.

As a Turkish professor writes to me:

“There has been an air of terror where people are afraid to talk anymore, in public or over the phone or even behind closed doors against the government or Gulen movement. Who knows [whether] your words will be used against you in the future?”

Four prominent parliamentarians of the MHP party, the nationalist opposition, were forced to withdraw their candidacies in the forthcoming election after a mysterious website published video and audio of their involvement in illicit sexual activity. America has had its scandals recently. But the government using its intelligence assets to destroy its opponents systematically is something quite different.

Actually, since the process has not advanced so far, one can read about all of these things and more in some Turkish newspapers or be told of events by credible sources. The campaign of anti-Americanism is in the open. The daily preaching of hatred against Jews and Israel is in the open. The tightening links with Islamist movements and regimes is in the open.

As we know from leaks, the U.S. embassy in Turkey has reported many of the kinds of arguments and analysis I’m making. Yet the White House and the president are blind. On that reporting, check out Okan Altiparmak and Claire Berlinski, “The Wikileaks Cables on Turkey: 20/20 Tunnel Vision,” MERIA Journal, Vol. 14, No.4 (December 2010).

I don’t want to overstate the threat so feel free to assume I’m exaggerating. Subtract the proportion you want, take another look, and you’ll still see a great deal to be alarmed about.


The View from the White House

Perception of this revolutionary Islamist threat by Obama White House: Close to zero.

Actions taken by the Obama White House to counter it: Zero.


Principal enemy according to White House: Al-Qaida, which rules no population.

Main problem in the Middle East according to White House: Israel’s presence on part of the West Bank, ruling about 30,000 Palestinians directly (in Hebron) and the existence of settlements with about 300,000 Israeli settlers.

The View from the Middle East

Egypt has 82 million people; Iran has 78 million people. Turkey has 79 million people.


Total: By the end of this year, almost 240 million people in those three countries alone will live under Islamist or radical anti-American regimes allied to them.

Adding in the Gaza Strip, those under Hizballah control in Lebanon, and Syria brings the total to about 250 million. One-quarter of a billion people are going to be—many of them involuntarily–in the enemy camp. Call it the Crescent Curtain if you wish.

These countries and groups will not work together in every respect but they will work against the West, stability, democracy, and Israel’s existence.

The loss of Turkey—yes, I said it, loss—would be a tragedy of tremendous proportions to the West and, of course, the loss of liberty and democracy in Turkey would be most of all a tragedy for the Turkish people.

The event would be a tragedy; the failure to see what’s happening is shameful. In policy and analytical terms, it is the equivalent of criminal.

Barry Rubin is director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center, editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal, and a featured columnist at PajamasMedia http://pajamasmedia.com/barryrubin/ His latest books are The Israel-Arab Reader (seventh edition), The Long War for Freedom: The Arab Struggle for Democracy in the Middle East (Wiley), and The Truth About Syria (Palgrave-Macmillan). The website of the GLORIA Center is http://www.gloria-center.org. His PajamaMedia columns are mirrored and other articles available at http://www.rubinreports.blogspot.com/.





The story of the Palestinian popular protest against Israel in several West Bank villages has recently garnered worldwide praise. However, as with any other massive movement, the popular protest too has its darker sides. The Palestinian Authority, as well as the leaders of the Palestinian popular protests in villages such as Bil’in, Na’alim, Umm Salmuna, have been trying to keep the following story away from both public knowledge and the media’s eye: One of the more prominent Umm Salmuna activists – a village south of Bethlehem, long entrenched in a battle against the West Bank separation fence – is suspected of the attempted rape of an American peace activist who had been residing in the village as part of her support of the local protest.

Omar Aladdin, who had been arrested three months ago over suspicions he had attempted to rape the U.S. citizen, was subsequently released after agreeing to apologize to the young woman. However, Haaretz had learned that representatives of both the popular protest movement and the PA have since applied pressure on the American peace activist as to prevent her from making the story public.

The incident allegedly took place last April, as Aladdin, who had served a term in the Israeli jail in the past, arrived one evening at the guest house in which many of the foreign peace activists were staying. The European and American female activists reportedly agreed to let Aladdin stay with them after he had told them he feared the Israel Defense Forces were on his tail, adding that he had been severely beaten at an IDF checkpoint only a week before.

During his stay Aladdin allegedly attempted to rape a Muslim-American woman, nicknamed “Fegin” by fellow activists. The woman escaped, later accusing the popular protest man of the attempt. One villager who had encountered the American following the incident said she had been in a state of shock.

Aladdin then refused to apologize for the incident, when news of it reached the village’s popular committee, the popular protests’ governing body, allegedly saying that the incident had been marginal and normal. The American activist then asked the committee to notify authorities of the attempted rape, a request which resulted in the man being arrested by security forces in Bethlehem. After agreeing to apologize for the incident, Aladdin was released from custody by the PA police.

The U.S. citizen was then convinced to retract her complaint, as to avoid tainting the image of the popular protest, which had attracted praise from around the world in recent months.

However, the Umm Salmuna case is not the only one. Separation fence activists know of other incidents in which Palestinians molested and sexually assaulted foreign peace activists, a subject which was apparently raised in the discussions of the various popular committees.

Foreign female peace activists regularly participate in protests in the villages of Bil’in, Na’alin, and others, where the activists stay in separate houses. Some villagers do not agree with these housing arrangements, claiming that the villages’ youth, who frequently visit the activists, are corrupted by the young women.

One villager said the female activists bring a different “culture with them, western, too open. The young people, especially from the villages, aren’t used to stay near other girls, they do not know their culture, certainly when it’s a young woman staying with other women in a strange house. They misinterpret it.”

Mahmoud Zwahara, the popular committee’s coordinator for the Umm Salmuna and Ma’sara region, said in response that “the struggle against the separation fence is a joint fight, which does not target Israeli identity or Jews. We hope that our activity will show the Israeli soldiers that they must cease their actions against us as well as human rights violations.”

Na'alin demonstration







The International Solidarity Movement’s Comfort Women

Palestinian named Aladdin allegedly tries to force his “magic lamp” into American peace activist
by Bill Levinson

Q: What is the difference between women of the International Solidarity Movement along with those of other so-called “Peace and Justice” groups, and the prostitutes who followed armies of the horse and musket era?
A: The prostitutes got paid.

MESS Report / Are the Palestinians silencing the attempted rape of U.S. peace activist? reports that Palestinians routinely use “international” women, including Americans, for personal sexual gratification and relief. The women are then pressured to remain quiet lest complaints let alone criminal charges damage the Palestinian cause. From where we sit, peer pressure is simply a kinder and gentler form of what the Imperial Japanese Army did to get so-called “comfort women” to service its troops.

During his stay Aladdin allegedly attempted to rape a Muslim-American woman, nicknamed “Fegin” by fellow activists. The woman escaped, later accusing the popular protest man of the attempt. One villager who had encountered the American following the incident said she had been in a state of shock. 

…The U.S. citizen was then convinced to retract her complaint, as to avoid tainting the image of the popular protest, which had attracted praise from around the world in recent months.

However, the Umm Salmuna case is not the only one. Separation fence activists know of other incidents in which Palestinians molested and sexually assaulted foreign peace activists, a subject which was apparently raised in the discussions of the various popular committees.

Female Palestinian Peace Activists Suffer Sexual Harassment, Rape From Palestinians adds,

It won’t make the front page of the New York Times, but it seems that female peace activists in Israel who go to Arab villages are looked at as “piece” activists by the locals in the Arab villages. Women who go to these villages are sexually harassed, molested and in some cases raped.This article adds that an Arab women verbally abused gay pro-Palestinian activists. “…one female Arab from of Sheikh Jarrah has been telling the protesters to stop bringing their Gay Pride flags to the protest because they don’t like gays and she would like to kick them all out of the country.”

“Kill a faggot for Mohammad and Allah” is what the Palestinians are really trying to say, noting that Mohammad was into prepubescent girls instead of boys. We think QUIT (Queers Undermining Israeli Terrorism) should hold a gay pride march in Gaza, and tell us how it works out when they get back. If they get back.

PsyWar cartoon:

Posted by Bill Levinson
A demonstration against the seperation barrier in Na’alin.







Let us immediately and from the very outset dismiss historical relativism. There are not TWO or (worse) MANY narratives about the Arab Israeli conflict. There is only the one narrative and it is neither Israeli or Arab, it is the historical truth, or as near to that historical truth that it is possible for our human endeavours to approach, and as we learn more we approach closer and closer.


Rachel Neuwirth in her great historical treatise on 1948 has dealt a big blow against this historical relativism, which incidentally is also a moral relativism, in her April 13, 2008 titled The Expulsion Libel: 1948 Arab “Exodus”


4international in its work of 10 historical essays to appear on the sister website www.wedefendisrael.com is vitally interested in these 2 dates, the 1947 to 1949 period, and the 1967 7 days war period.


Most of the arguments concentrate around these two periods. They were periods of war and great change. War tends to be decisive and we must get close to the truth in remembering these two periods


Very, very fortunately the great Rachel Neuwirth has done much of our work for us in the former. Neuwirth is it would be fair to say not a Marxist or Trotskyist, is a bourgeois in her outlook, but no matter, her method is scientific and is true to historical scientific method.


Did the Jews in that war move ANY Arabs from their villages? Yes!


Since that answer is in the affirmative then it is possible for a certain type of “historian” better described as an unprincipled “scoundrel” to take such movements, dig a little, create a little if necessary, and hey presto we have a whole new narrative right there


Rachel Neuwirth thunders hammer blows against such lies and against that whole, unprincipled method of “history”.


She uses the same method which Leon Trotsky used, indeed used page after page, in his monumental work on the history of the Russian Revolution


This method which both Neuwirth and Trotsky employed is both simple and complex. Simple in the sense they use facts. Complex in the sense these facts are placed in context, a context itself which is based on facts.


About the same time a “study” of this 1947 to 1949 period was proffered to the Wikipedia encyclopaedia online, written from the Arab side, or from those who claim there are umpteen versions of this history, and the contrast between Wikipedia and Neuwirth is quite outstanding.


Put simply: Neuwirth uses primary sources. Wikipedia avoids primary sources.


So back to that question did the Jews move any Arabs from their villages in 1947 to 1949 and see how Neuwirth answers it.




(start Neuwirth here)


“I did not mean that no Israelis have forced any Arab residents of Palestine to evacuate their homes at any place or at any time during the past sixty years. Rather I meant that there was never any mass expulsion of the Arab population as a whole from Palestine/Israel, or from any region or part of Palestine/Israel, either during the Israeli War of Independence in 1947 – 49(the usual time-frame given by the anti-Israel “revisionist” or “new” historians for the alleged expulsion) or at any other time, and that it was never the policy or objective of Israel’s government to make Israel or Palestine “Arab-free,” or of “ethnically cleansing” the country of Arabs. If there ever was such a policy, then it would be impossible to explain how 1.4 million Arabs live in what is now sovereign Israeli territory today — many more than lived in the same territory before the state of Israel was founded. Just before the outbreak of first major Arab-Israeli war on November 30, 1947, a few months before Israelis declared their independence, there were at most 900,000 Arabs living in this same area.


Today there are large Arab populations in every region of modern-day Israel — the Galilee region in the north, the central coastal plain, the Judean hills, the “Shefela” or foothills region, and the Negev desert in the south. Arabs are at least 20 per cent of Israel’s present-day population. Arabs are half the population of two Israeli cities, Ramla and Lod, from which the Arab residents were, according to many historical accounts, expelled by Israeli soldiers during the War of Independence.


Naturally, I am skeptical of these accounts, since they don’t explain why there are more Arabs residing in these two cities (which were only small towns in 1948) than there were before the Arabs were allegedly expelled from them. Akko, another Israeli city, still has an Arab majority, just as it did in 1948, before Israeli soldiers gained control of it. There are large Arab communities in Israel’s three largest cities, Tel Aviv-Jaffa, Jerusalem, and Haifa, as well as in the city of Beersheva, which was a tiny village in 1948, but now has a combined Jewish and Arab population of over 100,000 people.


Over 100 of the Arab villages that were in what is now Israel before the nation was re-established in 1948 are still in Israel today; some of them, such as Umm-el-Fahm, Nazareth, and Sakhnin, have grown into all-Arab cities over the past sixty years. The Israeli government has also built new towns for its Arab citizens at locations that were previously uninhabited, and provided new homes and land to the Arab “settlers” in these communities at little or no cost to them.


And all of this Arab population is additional to the Arab inhabitants of Judea, Samaria, and Gaza region, who now number (depending on which population estimate you choose to believe) somewhere between 2.4 and 3.6 million people. This makes for a total present-day Arab population of what had been the territory of western Palestine under the British mandate of somewhere between 3.6 and 5 million people — about three times the total Arab population of this territory right before the War of Independence, and seven to ten times the Arab population in 1891. And if we include what is now the Kingdom of Jordan in “Palestine,” which we should, since it was the eastern section of the original British Palestine Mandate territory, then the total Arab population of Palestine has risen for about 1.7 million immediately before Israel became independent to perhaps eight million today. Some expulsion!


Neuwirth strikes many other blows against relativism which we will deal with in detail. In the meantime you can read the whole at this source