GEERT WILDERS HAS WON THE CASE AGAINST REACTIONARY ANTI FREE SPEECH LAWS
BUT THIS IS JUST ONE BATTLE IN A VERY LARGE WAR…JUST THE BEGINNING…NO MORE THAN THAT!
RAISES VERY BIG ISSUES ABOUT THE FAUX “LEFT” AND THEIR HATRED FOR THIS FREEDOM FIGHTER (FIGHTER FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH) AND THE ALLIANCE OF THIS FAUX “LEFT” WITH ISLAM
THE BBC THIS MORNING HAS THIS COVERAGE:
Dutch far-right politician Geert Wilders has been acquitted of charges of inciting hatred against Muslims.
Mr Wilders had described Islam as “fascist”, comparing the Koran to Hitler’s Mein Kampf.
He insisted his statements were directed at Islam and not at Muslim believers – something which is legal under Dutch law.
Judge Marcel van Oosten told him his statements were “acceptable within the context of public debate”.
“The bench finds that although gross and degenerating, it did not give rise to hatred,” he said.
The verdict was greeted with applause from Mr Wilders’ supporters in the public gallery.
Outside the courtroom, the 47-year-old politician said he was “incredibly happy”…
PAMELA GELLER WRITES ON THE VERDICT
West 1 Islam 0
The judges have delivered their verdict in the heresy trial of Dutch freedom politician Geert Wilders for inciting hatred against Muslims. NOT GUILTY of all charges of inciting hatred against Muslims. When do the Islamic supremacists go on trial for inciting hatred against non-Muslims?
Charges against Geert Wilders
- Intentionally offending Muslims
- Inciting hatred against Muslims
- Inciting discrimination against Muslims
- Inciting hatred of non-western immigrants
The islamic supremacists who initiated the case told judges that Mr Wilders’ comments have led to a rise in discrimination and violence against Muslims. This is the enforcement of blasphemy laws under Islamic law.
The case began on October 4 last year, but collapsed after three weeks when a special legal panel ruled the judges may have shown partiality following a string of legal blunders. New judges were then sworn in and the case was heard again this year. (Dutch News)
The Islamic supremacist ‘plaintiffs’ were seeking a one-euro fine. But it’s not about a largely symbolic fine, it is about a triumph over the tenets of Western law and free speech They said if they didn’t get their symbolic one-euro pne,y don’t get it, they say they will consider taking their case to the European Court of Human Rights. Ah yes, take it to the anti-humans under the guise of human rights.
THESE ENEMIES OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH WILL MOST LIKELY PROCEED TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, AND THEY WILL MOST LIKELY WIN THEIR CASE AGAINST WILDERS THERE, BECAUSE THAT COURT IS NOT NATIONAL AND ANSWERS TO NO ELECTORATE. THE COURT OF THE SOROS AGENDA AND NEW WORLD ORDER
THUS THIS WILDERS CASE OPENS UP INTO SOMETHING DIFFERENT, SOMETHING NOW CLOSER TO THE TRIALS IN THE ICTY, WHERE TRUTH DOES NOT MATTER, BUT WHERE THE NEED FOR IMPERIALISM TO MAINTAIN AN ALLIANCE WITH ISLAM IS PARAMOUNT, AND WHERE IMPERIALISM LAUNCHES AN ATTACK ON THE WORKING CLASS AND YOUTH WHO ARE FACED WITH SHOULDERING THE EFFECTS OF CAPITALIST ECONOMIC CRISIS, AS IN GREECE, IRELAND OR SPAIN.
WE HAVE TO DEFINE NOW WHAT IS MEANT BY THE “WEST” MENTIONED ABOVE BY PAMELA GELLER.
IN THE SENSE THAT PAMELA GELLER USES THE TERM AND AS WE ON 4INTERNATIONAL MEAN IT WHAT IS KEY IS THE PRINCIPLES OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT, WHICH WAS ACHIEVED BY THE GLORIOUS GREAT AMERICAN REVOLUTION
THAT IS WHAT IS UNDER ATTACK BY ISLAM AND BY FORCES WITHIN IMPERIALISM, OF WHICH THE FAUX “LEFT” IS PART.
4INTERNATIONAL FEELS THIS IS ONLY THE BEGINNING
WE MUST UNITE TO DEFEND THE RIGHT OF FREE SPEECH
EXPECT MORE ATTACKS ON FREE SPEECH TO FOLLOW FAST AND FURIOUS