Galloway with Hamas official on entering Gaza


George Galloway has just spoken on video, on the issues in Libya, Egypt and Syria, which has been translated from his English, into Arabic on the video, and back into English, and this is it (allowing for those translations)

 carried on the pro NATO Harry’s Place

(Please note that I’ve translated a translation from English into Arabic back into English, so there may be a slight discrepancy in the words used.)


(It is very revealing. Galloway is hiding the role of Islam, and this is totally obvious from what he says, is correct in opposing NATO but is hiding the alliance of people like Hague and Cameron with Al Qaida against Gadhafi, and thus providing a cover for Islam. He also strives to drive and divert the movement into hatred for Israel which is the whole essence of the left politics of today)

“If the Syria regime were to be toppled by this alliance, this extreme alliance which is supported by the puppet Khaddam and by the people who supported the Homs massacre [surely Hama?] which was carried out by Rifat Al Assad,and by people who are working for Israel and others who are working for France and the US, in addition to genuine demonstrators who want change.

“This coalition isn’t secure at all, and the Syrian people should know that the Imperialists are not investing a lot (to defeat Assad) because they love the Syrian people. So I ask this question, If the regime were overthrown then would Israel give you back the Golan? This America which is supporting the your so-called revolution in Syria, will they tell Israel to give you back your land? Absolutely not.

“The Syria regime has made a lot of mistakes, historically and right now, and the way they’ve responded at the beginning of these demonstrations, was a massive mistake.

“However they [imperialists?] are not trying to destroy Bashar because of anything bad which he’s done, but they are trying to destroy Bashar because of the good things which he has done– for instance his support for the Palestinian resistance, his support for the Lebanese resistance, his refusal to surrender to Israel, his refusal to allow Syria to be a base for the invasion of Iraq. These are the reasons why they’re trying to destroy Bashar Al Assad.

“I think that Bashar Al Assad wants reform and that he wants change… He wants to respond to the demand for change which a lot of people want. I urge him to quickly get this underway. Yes it’s late in the day, but I will never ever support NATO in Libya and this cocktail of Zionism and Imperialism in Syria right now.”


Galloway says he will never support NATO in Libya.


But Galloway hides something very important here, and that is that NATO is in alliance with Islam (the “rebels” are Al Qaida)


But Galloway does not say that he opposes NATO PLUS ISLAM in Libya. He just says NATO.


This is where he tells the Big Lie and keeps workers and youth in the world back from understanding that there is a real alliance in operation in the world today


He is presenting to readers a left front, but in reality he is hiding the role of


Go right through this left today and you will find this lying about the actual concrete situation. The left like Galloway are in an alliance with Islam.


As is imperialism! Go figure!


The Left has been coopted by the forces of US and EU Imperialism, just as much as the Provies in Ireland were taken over by British and Irish Intelligence…TOTALLY!


Read what Galloway said above, and then read what we on 4international said today on the issue of Libya


Our first 4 paragraphs (before reading what Galloway said) are:

It is pretty much the case that war alone on 4international came out from the very beginning and called for the victory to Muammar Gadhafi. This did not imply political programmatic agreement. Just that Gadhafi was fighting the alliance of Imperialism with Islam Imperialism.


Now the murder of the Generals shows that Al Qaida does control the “rebels”. Argument over!


We were absolutely right. We alone were absolutely right.


Switch the scene to Egypt.


4international salutes Muammar Gadhafi!


It is pretty much the case that war alone on 4international came out from the very beginning and called for the victory to Muammar Gadhafi. This did not imply political programmatic agreement. Just that Gadhafi was fighting the alliance of Imperialism with Islam Imperialism.


Now the murder of the Generals shows that Al Qaida does control the “rebels”. Argument over!


We were absolutely right. We alone were absolutely right.


Switch the scene to Egypt.

File:Battle of the Camel.jpg


Listen to this yesterday from the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt AS THE LARGEST DEMO FILLED CAIRO YESTERDAY


The Muslim Brotherhood – Egypt’s best organized political force – and the former terrorist organization Gamaa Islamiya along with disparate Salafist bodies argue that only God’s word is greater than a constitution and that only a parliament chosen by free election can set the terms for a constitution.


That was the essence of the massive demo yesterday.


The BBC which was and is slavish in support of the ousting of Mubarak yesterday stated from the reporter on the spot that in a new election he reckoned the MB would win 25 to 28 per cent. Why just 28, why not 30, 35…which is heading towards power in government


But the modern leftist fascists who plague us say in response (they always have a response) it will not be like the Islam in Iran, it will be more like the Islam in Turkey!!!


In the following report the issue of the Coptic Christians comes up yet again. Read it.




In the largest crowd to fill the square since the popular uprising that ousted President Hosni Mubarak in February, Salafis chanted for the implementation of strict Islamic law — spurring accusations that they violated an agreement to keep the rally free from divisive issues.

They have come in a show of force to demand that the country’s caretaker authority, the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, cease its plans to present a set of principles that will form a framework for a new constitution.

Islamist group’s such as the Muslim Brotherhood – Egypt’s best organized political force – and the former terrorist organization Gamaa Islamiya along with disparate Salafist bodies argue that only God’s word is greater than a constitution and that only a parliament chosen by free election can set the terms for a constitution. These groups stayed away from recent demonstrations that sought to keep up pressure on the military council that took power after former president Hosni Mubarak’s fall, leading to smaller crowds.

The groups believe that they will poll enough support to dominate such a parliament and thereby set the terms. They fear that a kind of bill of rights could close off the possibility of a state run by Islamic laws.


File:Flotilla injured israeli soldier.jpg

(The small number of Israeli soldiers who had to board the Mavi Marmara were in great danger from the Islamist desparadoes of George galloway friends in the IHH)

The Young Leadership Department of the World Mizrachi Movement and the student organization Yavneh Olami have announced their plans to hold a special flotilla, this time in support of Israel.

The “Blue and White Flotilla,” which is scheduled to sail from Ashkelon to Ashdod on August 14, is aimed at providing a pro-Israeli response to the freedom flotillas that have been sent to Gaza by anti-Israeli organizations.

The organizers of the “Blue and White Flotilla” plan to hold a special ceremony during the flotilla to honor the soldiers of the IDF’s Shayetet 13.

It was the Shayetet 13 soldiers who boarded the Mavi Marmara during the 2010 flotilla which attempted to break Israel’s naval blockade on the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip. The soldiers were attacked by self-proclaimed ‘peace activists’ on board the ship, who attempted to lynch them and kidnap them.

Nine members of the lynch-mob were killed when the commandos were forced to open fire to save their imperiled comrades.

Anti-Israel organizations attempted to launch a similar flotilla this year, but it fizzled when the vessels that docked in Greece were refused permission by Hellenic authorities to sail for Gaza. Two were turned back by the coast guard after leaving port without authorization. Flotilla organizers claim two other boats were sabotaged.

The lone ship that did manage to set sail, the Dignite al Karama, was peacefully intercepted by the Navy and was taken to the Ashdod Port. 

The organizers of the “Blue and White Flotilla” do not plan to stop at just supporting the Navy, and will also call on the Hamas terror group to release captive Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.

Shalit was kidnapped in June of 2006 by Hamas terrorists and has been held in Gaza ever since. He has not been allowed visits by the International Red Cross for the entire time, and the organization recently called on Hamas to prove that Shalit is still alive.

“Beyond an expression of solidarity and standing alongside the State of Israel, the goal of the ‘Blue and White Flotilla’ is to rouse young Jews around the world, prepare for and to assist Israel in coping with the challenges it faces in the near future, with the expected announcement of a Palestinian state in the United Nations, and in the face of further anti-Israel flotillas which are expected to arrive in the future,” the organizers said in a statement on Thursday.

“We intend to sail with several yachts and boats from Ashkelon to Ashdod, on Aug, 14, 2011,” they added. “During the journey, we will hold a special ceremony saluting the soldiers of Squadron 13 and the Navy, and call upon the terrorist organization, Hamas, and countries around the world, for the speedy release of Gilad Shalit, who remains in captivity for over five years.

“At the end of the flotilla there will be a special event and concert in Ashdod.”


4international says

4international is very much in support of this initiative by Jewish youth in Israel to create a flotilla which will raise the true story of the Mavi Marmora (The Jewish soldiers were the ones who were viciously attacked and including with guns) which is outlined in the story below from Israel national News, and which also is raising the plight of the Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, who is being held against all Geneva Convention Norms.


This intervention by these Jewish youth show that there is a way for Israel to fight back against the anti-Semitism of the world


4international, which follows in the traditions of the Russian communist revolutionary Leon Trotsky is sending our greetings to these proud Zionist youth on the Flotilla and we will follow its progress with interest and pride in the great Jewish nation


The issue of the young Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit is a revolutionary question and not one that can or should be solved by doing deals with Hamas/Fatah


On July 22 we wrote that Netanyahu must not trade with Hamas but must militarily defeat Hamas and Fatah


(We know it is easy to say do not trade, yet the only way is NOT to trade with Hamas/Fatah but defeat them in battle) It is certainly the only long term strategy but we are sure the short term strategy as well.


The whole perspective of trading thousands of terrorists for one soldier is the perspective of defeat.


It has to be understood by every Israeli soldier that if they are captured by this enemy then they are in great danger unless and until the enemy is defeated in battle. But why wait for these Fatah/Hamas Fascists to capture these Israeli soldiers like Shalit in the first place. This is a war situation.


It therefore goes without saying that the politics of the parents of Gilad Shalit have to be opposed right down the line. But this needs to be done in the overall context which is DEFEAT TOTALLY THE ENEMY


Instead of fighting to DEFEAT TOTALLY THE ENEMY Netanyahu is collaborating all the time with the US fascist ELITE and with the EU Fascist ELITE, and is collaborating with these anti-Semitic Fascists of the US and EU elites against the Israeli Jewish people.





In war if a soldier is captured by an enemy like Hamas/Fatah only war can solve the issue. This is really the law of all war.”



File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-N0827-318, KZ Auschwitz, Ankunft ungarischer Juden.jpg

(Hungarian Jews arriving in Auschwitz in 1944…German Federal Archives)

The essence of the political situation in Norway, especially in its foreign policy, is support for “Palestinians” and for “Palestinian State”

Combined with hatred for Israel across the political sphere, but especially among what is misnamed as the left in Norway. We use this word very reluctantly.

The youth and children in the camp which Anders Breivik so brutally attacked were undoubtedly indoctrinated in this Jew Hatred. If they ever come to light the proceedings will demonstrate this antisemitism.


This was a double tragedy for these children, murdered by the individual terrorist killer in a most callous manner, also tragic in that they were indoctrinated into antisemitism.

Jew Hatred in our era has changed from hatred of the individual Jew and to hatred of Israel, of Zionism, and of the rights and needs of Israel to defend itself from Islam and from any form of antisemitism.

These children in this camp were all indoctrinated in this evil ideology.

The killer Breivik recognised this. His ACTIONS were brutal and pathological. But his recognition of the antisemitism in the left today was correct.


Note that does not provide ANY excuse to the killer Breivik. The way of human thought and of people ideology is that, GIVEN A CLEAR AND PRINCIPLED LEADERSHIP, many if not all of these youth could be won to an opposition toantisemitism, and to a clear theoretical understanding of the reactionary nature of Islam, and how islam is being used today by the ruling capitalist/imperialist class to enslave in body and mind alike.


But the so called “left” is betraying big time. These children cruelly murdered are victims not only of Breivik but are also victims of the left ideology which is heavily laced with antisemitism and ignorance of history.


In that regard the picture above showing Jews entering the Nazi Concentration Camp is very apt.


The Hizbullah leader has stated to the world what a good thing it is that all of the Jews are now concentrated in Israel where it will be possible to liquidate them


As pamela Geller has so wisely stated “Where is the outcry against Nasrullah!”

Iran is at present creating a Nuclear Bomb which will carry out that threat. There is not even a murmur about this from Hague, as he illegally expels the Libyan diplomats from Islam/Left controlled London.

Hamas is based on the whole idea of liquidationg all Jews and ending the state of Israel.

The OSLO peace Accords opened the door to endless butchery of Jewish people, as suicide Muslim murderers blew themselves and thousands of Jews up, to murder thousands of Jews and to maim for life many thousands.

All under the direction of OSLO who never wavered in their support for Arafat, who was masterminding the murdering of Jews.


That is the reality of Norway today. Norway supports all of that. And this should prompt us to look at the history of Jews in Norway during the Holocaust. This history was HIDDEN from the Norwegian children on that island on that weekend.

Wikipedia on the Holocaust in Norway:

In the middle of the occupation of Norway by Nazi Germany, there were at least 2,173 Jews in Norway. At least 775 of these were arrested, detained, and/or deported. 742 were murdered in the camps, 23 died as a result of extrajudicial execution, murder, and suicide during the war; bringing the total of Jewish Norwegian dead to at least 765, comprising 230 complete households.[1] In addition the few who survived the camps, the rest survived by fleeing the country, mostly to Sweden, but some also to the United Kingdom. A few also survived in camps in Norway or in hospitals, or in hiding.

Hajj Amin el Husseini was the driving force along with Himmler and Eichmann in the mass murder of the Jews. But in 1945 following this Holocaust of the Jews Hajj Amin el Husseini was allowed travel to Egypt by the forces of capitalism, US, france, Britain, and there hajj Amin el Husseini founded what is known today as the “Palestinians”, that is fatah/Hamas

It is this Fatah and Hamas that the Norwegian lefts have been so much behind in the last 2 decades

But not just the Norwegian lefts, ikt is the left in general. As we speak there is a delegation of British lefts associated with the British Labour Party on a Solidarity Visit to Hamas (which pledges with Iran a new Holocaust)

Following the German invasion and occupation, of Norway, and after the legitimate Norwegian government had left the country, German occupying authorities under the leadership of Reichskommissar Josef Terboven, put Norwegian civilian authorities under his control. This included various branches of Norwegian police, including the district sheriffs (Lensmannsetaten), criminal police, and order police. Uniquely Nazi police branches, including the Sicherheitsdienst and Gestapo, also became part of a network that served as tools for increasingly oppressive policies toward the Norwegian populace.[3]


(Incorrect) estimate of the number of Jews presented at the Wannsee Conference

As a deliberate strategy, Terboven’s regime sought to use Norwegian, rather than German, officials to subjugate the Norwegian population. Although German police and paramilitary forces reported through the RSHA chain of command, and Norwegian police formally into the newly formed Department of Police, the actual practice was that Norwegian police officials took direction from the German RSHA.

Although several Jewish Norwegians already had been arrested and deported as political prisoners in the early months of the occupation, the first measure targeting all Jews was an order from the German foreign ministry made through Terboven that on 10 May 1941 the police of Oslo were to confiscate radios from all Jews in the city. Within days local sheriffs throughout the entire country received the same orders.

(Note what Wikipedia says here…local sheriffs, that means Norwegian people)

To identify Jewish Norwegians, the authorities relied on information from the police and telegraph services; also the synagogues in Oslo and Trondheim were ordered to produce full rosters of their members, including their names, date of birth, profession, and address. Jewish burial societies and youth groups were likewise ordered to produce their lists.

In August, the synagogues were also ordered to produce lists of Jewish individuals who were not members. The resulting lists were cross-referenced with information Nasjonal Samling had compiled previously and information from the Norwegian Central Bureau of statistics. In the end, occupying authorities in Norway had a more complete list of Jewish residents in Norway than most other countries under Nazi rule.[3][4][5][6]

On the basis of the lists compiled in the spring, the Justice Department and county governors started in the fall to register all Jewish property, including commercial holdings. A complete inventory was transmitted to the police department in December 1941, and this also included individuals who were suspected of having a Jewish background.

Anti-Semite graffiti on shop windows in Oslo in 1941.

On 20 December, the Norwegian Department of Police ordered 700 stamps with a 2 cm tall “J” for use by authorities to stamp the identification cards of Jewish individuals in Norway. These were put into use on 10 January 1942, when advertisements in the mainstream press ordered all Norwegian Jews to immediately present themselves at the local police stations to have their identification papers stamped. They were also ordered to complete an extensive form. For purposes of this registration, a Jew was identified as anyone who had at least three “full-Jewish” grandparents; anyone who had two “full-Jewish” grandparents and was married to a Jew; or was a member of a Jewish congregation. This registration showed that about 1,400 Jewish adults lived in Norway.

(see full report on




Norway was and is a central focus of antisemitism in the world.


Jews feel particularly betrayed by the Norwegian people. First of all as the whole of the Wikipedia study makes clear, the Holocaust of the Jews in Germany was carried out by the German Nazis, but the German Nazis used the medium of the Norwegian Jew Haters and even Norwegians who did not hate Jews at all but who still carried out the Holocaust. That is conceivable.


That is the uncomfortable reality that the present day Norwegian elites have covered up. It is actually a clear form of Holocaust Denial.


And that antisemitism did not stop in 1945. How could it stop or why should it stop!


As the Irish man Conor Cruise O’Brien said “Antisemitism is a light sleeper”


Jews feel particularly betrayed by Norway for setting in place the Oslo Accords, which was really to elevate the followers of Hajj Amin el Husseini to statehood, out of which process came the murdering of so many Jews IN ISRAEL


This history has been hidden from these Norwegian children who were murdered last weekend. It is a history which must be learned.


Essentially the issue in Norway is about a cold blooded murderer called Breivik who planted a huge bomb in Oslo (individual terrorism to which Marxists and Trotskyists have always been opposed, whether done by the Provisional IRA or Breivik it is all the same to us…we oppose this under each and every condition without any exception). Using the same murderous method Breivik continued his murder spree by mowing down children and youth attending a labourist youth gathering on an island. All Marxists and Trotskyists historically opposed this sort of thing and we do today, totally and completely.


There is also the situation in the world today of severe economic crisis in capitalism, causing deep political crisis


Looking at this general world economic crisis in a general sense, what do we see? One thing that is very obvious is that the ruling capitalist classes in their governments have been lining up alongside of Islam, even as Islam is always intent on Jihad. It is in the very nature of Islam to be on its Jihad. It is written deeply into the very foundational documents of Islam. Does that mean that all Muslims are on a violent Jihad? It does not, but it certainly means that a significant number of Muslims are supporters of a violent Jihad. And they are supported and defended by capitalism.


Pamela Geller is now being attacked by these very capitalist forces who are in union with the Islamic Jihad. It is an ideological issue. These defenders of capitalism are attacking Geller. They are trying to close down Geller and to close down the whole of the movement which holds the political view that Islam is a very reactionary ideology.


Geller hints at but does not make the leap that we on 4international did and do, that the Jihad is being used by very dark forces within capitalism. Geller remains a firm believer in capitalism as a system.


We saw these dark forces in the destruction of Yugoslavia.


First the CIA was the spearhead behind the Nazi Tudjman and was directly implicated in the worst crime since the Nazis, the driving of Serbs and the murder of Serbs in the Krajina region of Croatia.


Then the alliance of western capitalism with Izetbegovic in Bosnia. Then in Kosovo. Then the bombing of Serbia, all actions involving a great Lie campaign, centred on Srebrenica, Racak.

More recently the open alliance with Qaradawi and the Muslim Brotherhood against anti Jihadists like Mubarak and gadhafi




…At the same time this was going on, the constant if you like, the Jews of Israel were being attacked time and again, and threatened, by having a Jihadist state called Palestine to be erected on their flank.


Indeed the main plotters in this regard were the Norwegian labourites, and the Norwegian so-called peaceniks, in what became known as the Oslo Accords, the result of which was the political and theoretical disarming of the Jews, and the massacre of thousands of Jews on the streets of Israeli cities and towns in the 90s, and the more Jews were murdered the more these Norwegian peace people were blaming the Jews.


So at the very least this calls for sensible people to have a close look at the history of the Norwegians, especially their role in the Holocaust, and at history in general


I repeat at the risk of boring…we are talking here all the time about particular ideological roots.


It is at this time that this particular attack has come upon Geller, and this attack is from a Jew onto another Jew.


Try to follow the argument of this guy Goldberg here. The content is a bit confusing because he laces his attack on Geller with some comments from Geller (I have placed Geller in italics to make it easier)


On Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, and Other Jihadists

By Jeffrey Goldberg

Jul 25 2011, 9:05 AM ET

I’m away, and it’s hard to keep up with the news, but it seems as if my arch-nemesis Pamela Geller is in a bit of a pickle because she and her partner-in-Muslim-bashing, Robert Spencer, were favorites of the Norway killer. (Btw, I call her my arch-nemesis, but I’m grateful to her for calling me what I believe to be the best epithet ever, “Jewicidal Jihadi.” Also, “Jihad Jeffro.” All I’ve ever come up with to describe her is “shrieking bigot,” which doesn’t have the same power, or alliterative quality.) Here’s The Times on Geller, and Geller’s delightful response:

Mr. Breivik’s declaration did not name Mr. Kaczynski or acknowledge the numerous passages copied from the Unabomber’s 1995 manifesto, in which the Norwegian substituted “multiculturalists” or “cultural Marxists” for Mr. Kaczynski’s “leftists” and made other small wording changes.

By contrast, he quoted the American and European counterjihad writers by name, notably Mr. Spencer, author of 10 books, including “Islam Unveiled” and “The Truth About Muhammad.”

Mr. Breivik frequently cited another blog, Atlas Shrugs, and recommended the Gates of Vienna among Web sites. Pamela Geller, an outspoken critic of Islam who runs Atlas Shrugs, wrote on her blog Sunday that any assertion that she or other antijihad writers bore any responsibility for Mr. Breivik’s actions was “ridiculous.”

“If anyone incited him to violence, it was Islamic supremacists,” she wrote.

(The above is anything but clear, from this great journalist Goldberg. I think he is counterposing the New York Times and Geller’s response)

Anyway Goldberg goes on to lay down his position clearly. He uses this tragedy for these labour children to knife Geller, remember that, and he is Jewish:


Goldblog’s position: Geller is a hatemonger, but she didn’t pull the trigger. Free speech means free speech. But she should be aware now that violent people look to her for guidance, and she should write with that in mind. Which brings me to the subject of the Murfreesboro, Tennessee, mosque, the new “Ground Zero mosque” controversy. People like Herman Cain, who vilify this mosque (and other mosques) should think carefully about the ways in which their words are heard. I worry about a violent reaction to the Tennessee mosque more than I worry about any other terrorism target in America. More on this later, when I have better access to the Web.


So Goldberg blames Geller for this murderer being born!


He is knifing Geller in the back and above all he is calling for the curtailing of the discussion on everything that matters


Who in this world want to defeat the necessary airing of views? the nazis that is who.


The action of Hitler and the Nazis on taking the power in 1933, largely thanks to the betrayals of the social democrats and the Stalinists, was to curtail (STOP LIQUIDATE END MOST DEFINITIVELY) THE POLITICAL DISCUSSION INSIDE GERMANY)


There is a real Nazi Movement developing but it has nothing to do with Breivik or any other individual terrorist. Please help. Please work to defend Pamela Geller and defend the right of free discussion.


The Norwegian brutal and callous killer (Breivik) of the Young Socialist children on the island off Oslo may be mad but more likely is is a manipulated tool of very dark and anti-Semitic forces. Ask: who gains?

The haters of Israel, the anti-Semites in the world, that is who.

File:Anders Behring Breivik (Facebook portrait in suit).jpg

There are 2 factors which I think are relevant

  1. The collapse of the recent Flotilla attacks on Israel which were above all not physical attacks, but were ideological attacks, to lay the ground for later physical attacks, which would end in a nuclear Iranian Jihad strike on Israel
  2. The US elite Nazi policy towards Israel, where it supports the creation of a Palestine state, but wait, the people who dream up this Palestine State are the descendants of Hajj Amin el Husseini, the main leader and organizer of the Holocaust with especially close friend and colleague Eichmann, and their main helpers are the Nazis of the CIA who helped form the PLO of Arafat

Norway was at the centre of the Oslo Accords which led on to the murder of THOUSANDS OF JEWS IN ISRAEL


Norway represents very much today the alliance of the left anti-Semitism with the anti-Semitism of Islam, and as we saw in Oslo with the US elite and Nazi CIA (See Blowback by Christopher Simpson)


These Young Socialist Children murdered so brutally by this madman, or tool, were no more than children being fed this callous anti-Semitism by the above mentioned forces.


The attack on these children, which is really also the attack on children of the left who are politically immature, and who have been fed the lies of anti-Semitism, is for sure an attack on Israel and the Zionist Cause of a Homeland.


It is also a direct attack on especially the American Christian people and main friends in this period of the Jewish people


We on 4international are well known for our unique political position. We maintain that there is an ALLIANCE in the world today, between capitalism in crisis (CIA etc) and the forces of reactionary Islam


Just like Hitler made that firm alliance with Islam in the 1930s (Hajj Amin el Husseini)


And so we say the Norwegian killer is a tool of these forces, whether a conscious tool or an unconscious tool.


The forces around Obama, and around the anti-Jewish and Nazi driven American elite want and need to take on the Christian supporters of Israel in America.


This is why the Facebook pages of the killer need some examination.


It appears there are TWO Facebook pages, and on the later one the concept of “Fundamentalist” and “Christian” have been added


So is Charles Johnson merely a crooked opportunist man, or actually also a tool of these reactionary forces, when he links Pamela Geller, who hates the killer, to the killer!!!




  1. This emerges out of the Jew Hating Norway…Look at their record and history in the Holocaust
  2. The US elite, in order to survive the economic crisis, are using once again anti-Semitism
  3. This attack is directed against the ordinary Americans who support Israel. Hence the adding of “Christian” and “Fundamentalist” to the killer (especially on Facebook Page see Mark Mumphries)…But based on what precisely…Another Srebrenica Big Lie in the making here
  4. Obama is only the latest manifestation of the Jew Hatred of the US Elite. He and his forces are behind this Norwegian brutal killer. Just as they were behind the Big Lie of Srebrenica.

And finally, the US Capitalist Elite and big sections of the EU capitalist Elite, including the representatives of that capitalism in the European Social democracy, are using anti-Semitism today, and seek to destroy the Jews once again, hence their continued acceptance of Iran having the Nuclear Bomb. The Young Socialist children murdered in Oslo are the victims of these callous rulers and Jew haters. Watch the fascist/proIslam  Left and CIA tool conspiracy nuts spin this against Israel…





The Oslo bombing and heinous murders of young people on an island attending a labour event

We think it is very significant that the attack was on government, was on children, and was on labourist children

What a crime that Charles Johnson has been using this horror terrorism to try to blacken the name of people like Pamela Geller. Indeed…



(on her blog Atlas Shrugs, not one article but many articles)

Like Pamela we on 4international have only one interest, which is to get to the truth of who did this dastardly deed and why…


Norway youth camp 
According toa  tweet from Hashim0307, this is the first pic from the shooting at the camp. He says it depicts bodies in the water. hat tip Fern.

Full coverage here.

The mass murderer who mowed down teenagers at the Utoya youth camp in one of multiple attacks in Norway today was seen in Oslo prior to his attack at the youth camp. After the Oslo blast he went to Utoya, dressed as a policeman, and in order to gain entry to the the youth camp, said he was on security detail in light of the Oslo bombings. Got that? He got through security and opened fire on the children.

It takes an evil of unimaginable depravity and barbarity to conceive and execute such carnage.

Witnesses on the island told Norwegian television that the man identified himself as a police officer when he entered the camp. “He said it was a routine check in connection with the terror attack in Oslo,” one witness told VG Nett, the Web site of a national newspaper.

Bjorn Jarle Roberg-Larsen, a Labour Party member who had telephone contact with teenagers on the island, said: “Kids have started to swim in a panic, and Utoya is far from the mainland. Others are hiding. Those I spoke with don’t want to talk more. They’re scared to death.” NY Times

Norway bombing, mass shooting leave at least 16 dead LA Times

2223: BBC

“She has talked to some of her friends but still some of her friends are missing,” said Ms Bakaas. “I don’t know if they are alive or in hospital.” She said police were still hunting for missing people on the island and for those who tried to swim to the mainland. “A lot of people here now don’t know if their children are alive or not.”

2220: BBC

Anita Bakaas told the BBC her daughter was on the island when the gunman hit, but managed to hide in a toilet with some friends from where she sent her text messages. Ms Bakaas said her daughter could hear gunshots the whole time. “It was scary, scary, scary.”

Oh, and if I hear another television or radio reporter refer to muhammad as “the Prophet Muhammad,” I think I am going to puke. He’s not your prophet, assclowns.

UPDATE: ABC News: Report: 20 Bodies At Norway Youth Camp After Gunman Opens Fire
Police belief attack linked to Oslo bombing. See Story >

gunman dressed as a policeman opened fire at a summer youth camp on a Norwegian island near Oslo, according to media reports. A witness told Norwegian television of seeing 20 bodies on the shoreline of the island of Utoya, but a police spokesperson said ten people are confirmed dead.The shooting at a camp run by the Labour Party, the political party of Norwegian prime minister Jens Stoltenberg, occurred just hours after explosions ripped through a government building holding Stoltenberg’s office in the capital city of Oslo, killing seven and injuring more than a dozen.

A suspect is under arrest, and police say they believe that he is also linked to the explosion in Oslo.

UPDATE: The Telegraph:  unconfirmed reports of up to 30 dead.

Oslo explosion: live coverage - Telegraph_1311370724881




At this stage who knows who this killer is and whether he acted alone, or was part of a wider and sinister group.


As I write the information is that he is a Nazi, right wing individual.


I feel personally that it is highly significant that he attacked


  1. The Government buildings and area
  2. A gathering of labour youth, I am unsure but they seem to be a “young socialist” type of gathering


Even though I am unsure of who he is, or who they are, one thing is for certain.


The whole attack in Europe (in a general sense) is against those like Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer who have taken up the fight against Islamic Jihad


The whole attack in Europe has been to provide a cover for Islam as an ideology


The whole attack in Europe has been to seek to hide the reality of Islam and to colour anybody who tries to explain what Islam is as being “right wing” and as being “hate” purveyors


But we on 4international will have none of this. We will not be hemmed in. we will seek to explain the truth (as we see it) at every point.


One of the issues involved in politics today is that the capitalist system is in deepening economic crisis, with consequent political and social crisis.


We also have a situation where we believe the capitalist class seeks allies in the Jihad of Islam


It will also seek allies in conservatism morphing into Nazism


And it also seeks allies in deranged “leftist” people, who can be used to attack genuine freedom fighters.


Such an example of the latter is the way that the whole truth movement has been diverted into hatred of Israel, the Israeli state, of Zionism and therefore we argue necessarily of Jews. It becomes anti-Semitic.


There are great lessons from the 1933 period when the capitalist and labourist forces were unable to provide an answer, and where the Nazis mobilised the forces of the enraged (by the crisis) middle classes and lumpen proletariat classes in order to seize power.


Once state power was in the hands of Hitler he moved very rapidly to destroy the trade unions, the organisations of the workers, all opposition even women’s groups and any kind of independent organisational situations.


Thus, apart from the tragedy of loss of life in Norway, these kinds of actions have a very unsettling effect on society at large.


If there is not a force able to take the power from off the capitalists, and the capitalist class, and the capitalist economy which is bankrupt, and thereby reorganise society on a new and socialist basis, we are descending into the barbarity of the madman, using IRA type and ETA type and Mexico drug cartel type violence, as sure as night follows day.


Leadership is the key.


The creation of our party, 4international, in order to analyse and lead in these situations is critical and vital.


The Norwegian ruling capitalist class, which is mainly represented by their leftist social democratic governments, have been the most anti-Semitic and Jew hating on earth. As has been the whole of Europe, the Brits, the Irish, the Spanish of the PSOE Zapatero etc., and now they are not crowing and pontificating against Israel this morning.


The anti-Semites of the government now realise they have their own problems.


Will that lead them to stop attacking Israel and to have sympathy with Israel?


I would hardly think so. The left in Europe and the world is anti-Semitic. Yet the future lies not with capitalism but with socialism. Which simply means that 4international has to lead.


WATCH THE LEFTIES Meeting of President Clinton, Binyamin Netanyahu, and Arafat in Wye Plantation, 15/10/1998.



It is clear that Netanyahu is now a key figure in whether or not the Israeli Jews and Israel will survive, or whether it will be sold down the river by a Jewish Israeli elite leadership, and Netanyahu is now that leadership.


That the secret service of the Israeli State closely linked to Netanyahu should raid the tent of the parents of the Israeli prisoner of Hamas, Shalit, seems to us on 4international as the most serious, alarming development


Now it so happens that we on 4international are in total opposition to what the Shalit parents want Israel to do, which is to let free thousands of Hamas/Fatah killers of Jews (in order to kill again, surely)


But to raid and search the tent where these poor parents of Shalit are campaigning for his life…that is an entirely different matter.


There is also the way in which Netanyahu used the dirtiest methods to shut up Feiglin. And this is the leader on whom the Israelis today depend.


In this material printed here one thing stands out: That Netanyahu was created in the United States, that he is a creature of the US intelligence community, Bush Snr., Shultz (George), those kinds of people.


There is the issue of Arens choosing of Netanyahu in an ambassadorial role to the United Nations


Literally from nowhere to leadership on the basis not of a programme, but a slick method of speaking in meetings, that sums it up.


Then there was the issue of GK (Gush Katif)…The patriotic Jews looked to Netanyahu to speak against Sharon, and they waited, and they waited, until essentially it was too late. The rotten deed could not be stopped.


Now there is this whole farce of the Obama lines speech, and Netanyahu emerging as an opponent of that Obama lines policy, but not really, because he is ALSO for the creation of a Palestine state, only perhaps on different lines


So his opposition to the anti-Semite Obama is not really fundamental, and is the opposition of say a Richard Perle.


So his opposition is really also the opposition of the Israeli elitist leaders in America, those same leaders who campaigned for Arafat to have his Jihadist State, and also those very leaders who supported Izetbegovic against the Serbs, and who supported the NATO/KLA takeover of Kosovo from the Serbs


Shine the light on Netanyahu!




By; Barry Chamish*


Two Fridays after Israel’s new Prime Minister was elected, the

newspapers were filled with bios of the new leader. The most indepth

research was undertaken by Orly Azula-Katz, Anat Meidan and Rami Tal of

Yediot Ahronot who produced a balanced portrait and Biranit Goren of

Kol Ha’ir whose story was a snow job.


Nonetheless, both reports agreed in most details, if not

interpretations. These two reports, combined with other public

knowledge create a most disturbing and mysterious caricature of

Israel’s leader for students of secret diplomacy.


The Conventional Story


The prevailing myth about Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is that he

grew up in a highly politicized, right wing household. Responsibility

for the presumption lies with his father Bar Tzion, a dedicated

revisionist who was a pallbearer at the funeral of Zeev Jabotinsky.


The facts are different. Netanyahu recalls,” My father did not want me

to enter politics. We were very non-political.” The founding families

of Zionism’s revisionist wing which produced two generations of leaders

like Menachem and Benny Begin and Yaacov and Dan Meridor, barely knew

of the Netanyahus.


What Binyamin inherited from his father was an obsession with learning.

His grades in junior high were all above average but he excelled in

only one subject: music.


When Binyamin moved to America at age fourteen after his father

accepted a teaching post in Philadelphia, his hero became JFK.

Netanyahu felt very alienated being away from Israel and took waitering

jobs to earn the money to spend his summers back home. There his

greatest pleasure was working on left-wing kibbutzim with his pals from

Jerusalem. They recall that he would always try to outwork them, even

when he had an injured knee.


Returning to high school in Philadelphia, Netanyahu shared close

friendship with only those students as imbued with love for Israel as

he was. He was a straight A student who graduated fourth in his class

at Cheltenham High School, one of the most academically competitive

schools in America. But he didn’t attend his graduation ceremony. War

broke out on June 5, 1967, and Netanyahu flew to Israel to volunteer

for the army.


A high school buddy, Ari Bintener recalls,”No one was surprised. It was

obvious his place was in Israel. I was pleased that he found a way to

help his country.”


Bob Trimble, Netanyahu’s soccer coach remembers,”Bibi was the best

player on the team, except for his brother Yoni who could have played

professionally if he had wanted to. The only problem with Ben was that

his political views were so far to the left of the other players.”


As a soldier, Binyamin rose to the rank of captain in the most secret

combat unit of all, the fighting arm of military intelligence. He took

part in a good number of legendary operations and was wounded while

fighting highjackers holding a Sabena passenger plane. On the Suez, he

almost drowned trying to swim with his heavy automatic rifle under

Egyptian fire. He became known as “the lousy swimmer from Jerusalem.”


Soldiers recall him as a cool but “square” officer who lost his temper

only once. That was when he found his men had been taking “souvenirs”

from operations in Lebanon. He put a quick end to what he viewed as



After five years of soldiering Netanyahu returned to America to study

architecture at either Harvard or MIT. He chose the latter because it

permitted him to begin an MA course load, as his academic advisor Prof

Leon Garviser remembers. “I told him that no one could handle the load

but he insisted that he had to make up for time lost while serving his

country. I agreed to add one extra course in the first semester and

when he passed all his courses I added another one. In the end he

finished his MA in two and a half years. Don’t ask me how. No one did

it before him or since.”


Once again, Netanyahu interrupted his studies only once. In October of

1973, war broke out in Israel and he flew back to fight in the Sinai.

When he returned, he became a student activist on behalf of Israel, a

fact that was noted by the Israeli consul of Boston, Collette Avital.

In one of the many ironies in his life, it was Avital, the dovish

consul of New York during the Rabin/Peres administration who arranged

Netanyahu’s first television appearance, a debate with PLO activist

Prof Edward Said.


The loss of his brother Yoni during the Entebbe raid put a stop to

Binyamin’s plans to become an architect. Instead he settled for an MA

in business administration and took a post at the Boston Consulting

Group. His boss was Ira Magaziner, the man who later was the

intellectual force behind the Clinton administration’s failed health

reform package.


As Moshe Arens notes, “Bibi is only the second prime minister who ever

had a real job outside the army or politics. Shamir was the first. He

once worked as an accountant in a glue factory.”


While working at Boston Consulting, Binyamin received his first

diplomatic assignment: he was sent to Sweden to advise the government

on efficient administration of public companies.


Already earning $100,000 and with a splendid career before him,

Netanyahu decided to give it all up and return to Israel to act as the

marketing manager of a furniture concern. As his colleague Barbara

Maclogan notes,”Anyone who claims Bibi planned to live in America

doesn’t know what he’s talking about. He gave up the opportunity of his

life in Boston to earn a quarter of his salary in Israel.”


In 1979, Netanyahu organized an anti-terrorism conference in Jerusalem,

dedicated to his fallen brother. Somehow, he managed to attract the

likes of George Bush, George Shultz, and Richard Perle (President’s

Reagan’s chief arms negotiator) to the meeting and was thrust briefly

onto the world stage. But when the conference ended, it was back to

work at the furniture factory.


That all changed in 1982, when Israel’s Washington Ambassador Moshe

Arens invited Netanyahu to be his deputy. This unprecedented career

rise has been a subject of much speculation. Many people have noted

that Bar Tzion Netanyahu was one of the few guests invited to Arens’

wedding and he was repaying an old friend. But Arens has a different

explanation. “People got a good laugh when they heard I phoned a

furniture factory to find a deputy. What sold me on Bibi was his

organization of the anti-terror conference and the strong impression he

made on American leaders who participated.”


In 1984, after two visibly successful years as Arens’ deputy, Bibi was

named Israel’s ambassador to the UN. In another of those ironies that

follow him, he was appointed to the post by Shimon Peres against the

objections of Yitzhak Shamir. Once again, it was a leader of the Labour

Party who promoted his early career.


This was the true turning point in his quest to become prime minister.

Netanyahu’s good looks, fluent English and controversial opinions made

him a media star. He became a frequent presence on Ted Koppel’s

Nightline and Larry King Live. As King observes,”Whenever he appeared,

the phones wouldn’t stop ringing. He especially made an impression on

women viewers. As a guest I’d rate him 8. If he had a sense of humor to

go with everything else, he’d have been a 10.”


During this period, Netanyahu wrote his book, Terror-How The West Can

Win. The book made a tremendous impression on the Reagan

administration. In fact, whenever George Bush visited New York, and

that was often, he would call on Netanyahu.


By 1988, Netanyahu had made powerful allies in the American media. He

received strong support from Charles Krauthammer of the Washington

Post, Abe Rosenthal of the New York Times, and Ellie Weymouth, daughter

of Katherine Graham, the publisher of Newsweek. When he returned to

Israel, he was too powerful a figure to be ignored and was appointed,

first Deputy Foreign Minister and later the Prime Minister’s spokesman.

In this capacity, CNN made Netanyahu an international media star during

the Persian Gulf War.


Netanyahu was ready to challenge the Old Guard of the Likud. The

combination of youth, determination and powerful allies abroad led to a

resounding victory in the Likud primaries of 1993 and in the general

elections of 1996.



Sent by Barry Chamish – Israeli journalist.

Phone/Fax : (972)-2-9914936

E-Mail    :




The Konformist: The Chamish Files – Bibi Part Two

Subject: The Konformist: The Chamish Files – Bibi Part Two


Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 07:04:20 -0500 (EST)


Subj: ESSAY: [2/2] Natanyahu

Date: 97-01-31 12:51:08 EST

From: (Chamish Barry)

From: Chamish Barry


The Secret Life Of Binyamin Netanyahu


Even within the conventional story, it is clear that Netanyahu was

groomed for leadership by the Council On Foreign Relations (CFR) in New

York. In 1979, twenty-seven year old Netanyahu called a conference on

terrorism and the ruling elite of the CFR, Bush, Shultz and Perle

answered to his summons. One word will suffice: why?


Yoni Netanyahu was undoubtedly a martyr but far from the only one in

Israel. He was not such a powerful symbol that the CFR would send a

delegation of its biggest guns, including CIA director Bush to his

unknown brother’s get-together.


Netanyahu’s decision to quit his lucrative Boston job is almost

inexplcable. Netanyahu sought a highpaying job at a prestigious

consulting firm yet not two months later, he gave it up to fly back to

Israel and sell sofas. He was barely settled in back home when he

decided to organize an anti-terrorism conference and invite the most

powerful people in Washington to attend.


It is possible that Netanyahu was told to quit his job, return to

Israel and arrange the conference. Perhaps there is a connection to the

fact that a year later Shultz later made fighting terrorism a first

priority of the Reagan administration and that Vice-President Bush was

appointed to head a front for illegal covert activities called The

Anti-Terror Task Force.


Arens’ offer of a deputy ambassadorship to salesman Netanyahu

made no political sense. Israeli diplomatic aides and deputies

typically rise slowly through the Foreign Ministry bureaucracy. They

are not thrust into the second highest position at the most vital

embassy in the world. It is far from impossible that Arens was

directed to bring in Netanyahu by the very people in the Reagan

administration who attended his conference three years earlier.


Once in New York in 1984, CFR-affiliated media such as CNN, the New

York Times, Washington Post, Newsweek and CFR members Koppel and King

turned Netanyahu into a major political figure; so much so that George

Shultz became a close friend. We again ask the succinct question: why?

What did Shultz, twenty years Netanyahu’s senior, find so amusing about

the Israeli UN Ambassador that he had to pay him a courtesy call every

time he flew to New York? In 1985, Shultz chaired another Netanyahu-

organized conference on terrorism, this time in Washington. The

resulting publicity and prestige was a significant factor in

Netanyahu’s fast-rising political career. Clearly, the secretary-of-

state had a major stake in Netanyahu’s future. Which means, so did

George Bush.


All that can be concluded from the conventional story. What then do we

make of Bibi’s secret life?


In 1987, Netanyahu applied for credit using his American social

security number 020364537. With that number, he or someone else made

the application under a phony name, John Sullivan, living at a false

address in Northern California.


Netanyahu used Sullivan’s name to borrow money during 1987-88. John

Sullivan does not exist, nor does Netanyahu’s credit file. Israeli and

American reporters who tried to dig into Netanyahu’s past using his

social security number discovered two other phony names used to apply

for credit in 1987-88 but were perplexed to find that his credit

records were completely removed. Only someone very high up in the

American government could have authorized the erasing of the file.


We return to the all-purpose question: why? Again, no one who knows is

talking. What is nearly certain is that while Netanyahu was the UN

Ambassador, he was either defrauding a credit company or on an

assignment involving money that required three identity changes.


Then there is Netanyahu’s close relationship with Congressman Ben

Gillman, head of the House Committee On International Relations. The

problem here is that Gillman was also a close associate of Shabtai

Kalmonovitch and shared business deals with him in Africa. Kalmonovitch

was, not long after, imprisoned in Israel as a KGB spy. This is not to

imply that Netanyahu was involved in spying, only that his closest ally

in Congress has mighty strange intelligence ties to Israel.


And what to make of the mystery of Netanyahu’s housing?. Before he was

even the leader of the Likud, two foreign businessmen, Jack Mandel of

Australia and Sandy Eisenstadt of the US each paid about $750,000 to

buy Netanyahu luxury apartments in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Again, no

one has a clue why. There is speculation that part of the reason may be

Eisenstadt’s stake in an Israeli oil exploration company, a shady and

hidden business, but no concrete connection has been discovered by the

Israeli media.


Netanyahu’s penchant for secrecy is not subtle. It is well-known among

the Israeli media that he had conducted a number of secret meetings

with the Jordanian royal family in London and Amman before he became

prime minister. Even the conventional Jerusalem Post reported in mid-

June that six secret meetings were held in the past two years. But when

Inside Israel just before the elections asked Netanyahu to comment on

the meetings, he denied they had ever taken place.


Perhaps the most secret and worrying ties concern what is supposedly a

high-tech services company. Yediot Ahronot relates how Netanyahu wooed

a local Likud leader. “He was invited by Netanyahu to a meeting in his

office at Systematics in Ramat Gan. The head of the company, Oded

Levental is a candidate for a financial post in the new government.”


Systematics is at the core of serious research by American alternative

publications, including the usually reliable Media Bypass. In short,

the allegations are that the National Security Agency had handed

Systematics stolen software called Promis that opened a trap door to

the world’s secret banking transactions. About 250 Americans, mostly

politicians, had their illegal foreign accounts emptied of over $3.5

billion in the operation. It is claimed that Colin Powell dropped out

of the presidential race after his account electronically vanished.

Leading figures in the operation included George Bush, Caspar

Weinberger and two Arkansas attorneys, Vince Foster Jr. and Hillary

Rodham Clinton on behalf of Clinton financier Jackson Stephens. The

research invariably concludes that Foster was murdered because he knew

too much about the scam.


A leading investigative writer, Sherman Skolnick, writes:


“Some contend Systematics is an NSA proprietary and spies on banks

overseas. Can Systematics rightfully deny spying actually done by

buffers or cut-outs between Systematics and NSA? Systematics, through a

spokesperson, vigorously denies Foster assisted it in any spying on

foreign banks but remains apparently silent on whether Hillary Rodham

Clinton assisted Systematics in some nefarious activities.”


Is it fair to ask why Systematics provided Netanyahu office space and

if this was the sum total of its involvement with him?


Since taking office, Netanyahu has fueled fears of international

control by his actions within Israel’s tiny anti-NWO community. They

were most intrigued by his refusal to give Ariel Sharon a sensitive

cabinet post. One possible reason is fear of Sharon’s own intelligence

arm in the US. Then for those people who fervently hoped that he would

rid himself of any connections to the Arye Deri scandal, with all its

implications of money laundering and perhaps murder, Netanyahu

appointed as his Justice Minister, Yaacov Neeman, a lawyer who is

currently being investigated for intimidating a key witness against

Deri in a London trial.


But the topper was Netanyahu’s decision to allow Yaacov Frenkel to run

the country’s economy single-handedly. Frenkel worked for the World

Bank between 1971-1990. After nineteen years away from “home” Frenkel

was unexplainedly appointed head of the Bank of Israel.


His policies mirrored the world-wide debt program of his previous

employer documented by numerous researchers. The plan involves raising

interest rates beyond what the public or industry can afford, and

forcing the government to borrow lots of money from American banks to

keep the populace pacified. When the debts have to be repaid from an

empty treasury, the International Monetary Fund bails out the country

with schemes guaranteed to impoverish the people.


Frenkel was a proponent of Israel borrowing $10 billion in loans

guaranteed by the American government and he kept his interest rates as

high as he could in the face of opposition from then-Finance Minister

Avraham Shohat who suspected Frenkel, “was playing politics with the

Bank of Israel.”


Binyamin Netanyahu, the man who Inside Israel hoped would save Israel

from the NWO puppet regime of Peres, appointed Yaacov Frenkel to be his

Minister of Finance. The only thing that prevented the disaster was

party opposition to an appointee who had never publicly supported the



Dan Meridor got the post instead. But as the Maariv headline read:

“Meridor Will Act, Frenkel Will Lead.” On his first day in office

Meridor announced that his policy would be to lower the standard of

living in Israel. Not a week later, Frenkel raised the interest rates

by a whopping 1.5% with Meridor’s “approval.”


Something is going on behind the scenes at the CFR. While Secretary of

State Warren Christopher must appear to be opposing Likud government

policies to keep the Arabs in line, the former CFR director is playing

some kind of double game with Netanyahu.


King Hussein made his accommodation with Netanyahu well before the

elections and refused to support Peres during the campaign. Netanyahu’s

victory clearly delighted him and on the surface, why not? The last

thing he would want is a PLO state on his border with control of the

Moslem holy sites. In time, it will become clearer what Netanyahu

promised the King during the secret London meetings. Included, most

assuredly, will be Jordanian hegemony over the Temple Mount.


There has been a transformation in Israel but the CFR is still running

the latest prime minister. And that is a good reason for intense fear

about Israel’s future.



Barry Chamish is the editor of Inside Israel, an investigative report

on Israeli affairs. For a free sample copy and subscription

information, write:



POB 579

Swindon, Wiltshire


Fax: 44-793-790722



Sent by Barry Chamish – Israeli journalist.

Phone/Fax : (972)-2-9914936

E-Mail    :


PMO Security Searches Schalit Tent

Security officers from the Prime Minister’s Office conducted a search of the Schalit family protest tent.

by Gavriel Queenann from INN

(4international comment at the end)

Published: 22/07/11, 9:09 AM

 Noam and Aviva Schalit

Noam and Aviva Schalit

Wikimedia Commons


A team of security officers from the Prime Minister’s Office entered the protest tent of the parents of kindapped soldier Gilad Schalt to execute a search on Thursday.

(Totally deplorable. Is Netanyahu an agent of the US State fascist Regime? Netanyahu should be kicked out on his ass over this raid! We say this even though we do not agree with the politics of the Shalit parents)


The security officers were accompanied a Border Police officer who questioned those present during the search. The tent is located near the Prime Minister’s office on public property.

Terror Victims’ Group Take on Shalits After Disruption

Yoel Shalit, brother of Gilad, interrupted the official Independence Day ceremony for fallen soldiers.
by Gil Ronen

Published: 12/05/11, 7:43 PM / Last Update: 12/05/11, 7:52 PM

Israel news photo: Flash 90

Meir Indor, chairman of the Almagor terror victims’ organization, is vowing to “take off his kid gloves” and fight the family of abducted soldier Gilad Shalit, following a provocation by the Shalits on Independence Day. 

Yoel Shalit, Gilad’s brother, and his girlfriend, Yaara Vinkler, interrupted the traditional torch lighting ceremony at Har Herzl that kicked off the Independence Day celebration, and received extensive air time on the television and radio stations that covered the event. Yoel Shalit held up a sign that said – “my father is a bereaved brother, I do not want to become one too.”
Indor said that the latest protest by the Shalit family was an act of desecration. “We, the wounded ones, and the bereaved families, also have many complaints about the mistakes that brought about the injury and death of many. Israel’s governments released terrorists who then caused the murder of Jews. In the past, we thought several times about protesting during the Remembrance Day for Terror Victims ceremonies, but we preferred to avoid such an act, because in these ceremonies there are lines one should not cross.”
The highly sympathetic press coverage that the Shalit protest received reflects an ambition on the part of the press to topple the Netanyahu government, Indor said. “We know that Channel 2 equipped the protesters with an open microphone and connected them to the console in advance, We will turn to the Knesset committees and to the Press Council in order to discuss this grave matter. Their broadcast licenses should be revoked.”
Indor announced his group’s intention to renew the protest vigil opposite the Shalits’ protest tent in Jerusalem. “This is a political struggle by a well-oiled staff sponsored by leftist elements,” he explained. “They have become an existential threat on the State of Israel. If, G-d forbid, the government gives in to them and releases terrorists, we can expect numerous additional cases of bereavement.”  
The Shalits have threatened to take the Netanyahu government to court if the Prime Minister does not immediately pressure the PA to release their son. They turned to Abbas for help now that Fatah has made a unity pact with Hamas, turning freeing Schalit into a test case of Abbas’ real intentions.

A violinist who is a regular fixture at the protest tent succeeded in recording part of the search. Security has entered the tent before, but this is the first search, they say.


Schalit’s family expressed anger and confusion after the search. 


“We do not understand why they did this,” Noam Schalit said. “We’ve been here in the protest tent for over a year and they have never conducted a search before.” 


The Prime Minister’s Office issued a statement after the search, “The protest camp of the Shalit family is located near the Prime Minister. Security officer inspections of security in the area are frequent and occasionally inspect the situation at the tent. Such inspections are conducted with maximum sensitivity, and it is important to note that there is no intention to harm the occupants of the tent”

PMO Security Searches Schalit Tent

Security officers from the Prime Minister’s Office conducted a search of the Schalit family protest tent.

by Gavriel Queenann

Published: 22/07/11, 9:09 AM



Noam and Aviva Schalit

Wikimedia Commons


A team of security officers from the Prime Minister’s Office entered the protest tent of the parents of kindapped soldier Gilad Schalt to execute a search on Thursday.


The security officers were accompanied a Border Police officer who questioned those present during the search. The tent is located near the Prime Minister’s office on public property.


A violinist who is a regular fixture at the protest tent succeeded in recording part of the search. Security has entered the tent before, but this is the first search, they say.


Schalit’s family expressed anger and confusion after the search. 


“We do not understand why they did this,” Noam Schalit said. “We’ve been here in the protest tent for over a year and they have never conducted a search before.” 


The Prime Minister’s Office issued a statement after the search, “The protest camp of the Shalit family is located near the Prime Minister. Security officer inspections of security in the area are frequent and occasionally inspect the situation at the tent. Such inspections are conducted with maximum sensitivity, and it is important to note that there is no intention to harm the occupants of the tent”

Severe Divisions Arise

Terror Victims’ Group Take on Shalits After Disruption

Yoel Shalit, brother of Gilad, interrupted the official Independence Day ceremony for fallen soldiers.
by Gil Ronen

Published: 12/05/11, 7:43 PM / Last Update: 12/05/11, 7:52 PM

Israel news photo: Flash 90

Meir Indor, chairman of the Almagor terror victims’ organization, is vowing to “take off his kid gloves” and fight the family of abducted soldier Gilad Shalit, following a provocation by the Shalits on Independence Day. 

Yoel Shalit, Gilad’s brother, and his girlfriend, Yaara Vinkler, interrupted the traditional torch lighting ceremony at Har Herzl that kicked off the Independence Day celebration, and received extensive air time on the television and radio stations that covered the event. Yoel Shalit held up a sign that said – “my father is a bereaved brother, I do not want to become one too.”
Indor said that the latest protest by the Shalit family was an act of desecration. “We, the wounded ones, and the bereaved families, also have many complaints about the mistakes that brought about the injury and death of many. Israel’s governments released terrorists who then caused the murder of Jews. In the past, we thought several times about protesting during the Remembrance Day for Terror Victims ceremonies, but we preferred to avoid such an act, because in these ceremonies there are lines one should not cross.”
The highly sympathetic press coverage that the Shalit protest received reflects an ambition on the part of the press to topple the Netanyahu government, Indor said. “We know that Channel 2 equipped the protesters with an open microphone and connected them to the console in advance, We will turn to the Knesset committees and to the Press Council in order to discuss this grave matter. Their broadcast licenses should be revoked.”
Indor announced his group’s intention to renew the protest vigil opposite the Shalits’ protest tent in Jerusalem. “This is a political struggle by a well-oiled staff sponsored by leftist elements,” he explained. “They have become an existential threat on the State of Israel. If, G-d forbid, the government gives in to them and releases terrorists, we can expect numerous additional cases of bereavement.”  
The Shalits have threatened to take the Netanyahu government to court if the Prime Minister does not immediately pressure the PA to release their son. They turned to Abbas for help now that Fatah has made a unity pact with Hamas, turning freeing Schalit into a test case of Abbas’ real intentions.



The problem here is the Government of Netanyahu, but here we must pause and examine what we mean


The parents of Shalit, the soldier held prisoner by hamas, are totally and naturally upset by the holding of their son by this vicious group of Fascists.


But they are blaming Netanyahu and not Hamas


They thus are calling on Netanyahu to release thousands of fascist Arab killers in return for the return and life essentially of Shalit


The real problem is this:


  1. Previous Israeli Governments, just about all of them, were prepared or did do exactly this
  2. Netanyahu is toying with the idea of just such a deal with Hamas/Fatah. His whole politics encourages the Shalit parents to think that a deal with Fascists is possible
  3. The whole of the Netanyahu political programme is based on a deal with these Fascists, to the extent of placing in power in “Palestine” these Jew killers. So this issue of Shalit is connected to the whole drive of the Israeli jewish elite to place these Fascists in Hamas/Fatah in a position of power in their own state
  4. That is the policy also of the US Government and of the whole of the EU


That in itself is introducing severe division, just as happened in Yugoslavia pre break up by NATO, War by NATO on Serbia and the murder of countless Serbs


The whole thing is the result of lack of leadership on the part of Netanyahu who at present holds position of PM, but it is a general lack of leadership, WHICH CANNOT BE SOLVED WITHOUT THE BUILDING OF A TROTSKYIST PARTY IN ISRAEL





  • The complete defeat of Hamas/Fatah, the complete taking over by Israel of all these nests of Nazism under both the PA and Hamas
  • There is no alternative to Israel making war on these enemies no matter how horrible war is. If this is not done then you have Jews preying on Jews as is happening here


The whole perspective of trading thousands of terrorists for one soldier is the perspective of defeat.


It has to be understood by every Israeli soldier that if they are captured by this enemy then they are in great danger unless and until the enemy is defeated in battle. But why wait for these Fatah/Hamas Fascists to capture these Israeli soldiers like Shalit in the first place. This is a war situation.


It therefore goes without saying that the politics of the parents of Shalit have to be opposed right down the line. But this needs to be done in the overall context which is DEFEAT TOTALLY THE ENEMY


Instead of fighting to DEFEAT TOTALLY THE ENEMY Netanyahu is collaborating all the time with the US fascist ELITE and with the EU Fascist ELITE, and is collaborating with these anti-Semitic Fascists of the US and EU elites against the Israeli Jewish people.





In war if a soldier is captured by an enemy like Hamas/Fatah only war can solve the issue. This is really the law of all war.



antisemitic cartoon on a spanish magazine

Comment 999 and 1000 to the El Pais article on raphael Schutz leaving Spain

1000 (comment)

José M Arderiu ( ) – 19-07-2011 – 11:27:02h

Criticar los CRÍMENES DE GUERRA y los CRÍMENES CONTRA LA HUMANIDAD (Informe del juez Goldstone para la ONU) que comete el estado de Israel, no es ser anti semita, es ser una persona decente. Los indecentes son los justificadores de dichos CRÍMENES, sionistas y simpatizantes radicales. Este Sr. que se va ahora, ni es diplomático, ni es decente, es un sionista radical, prepotente, que pretende justificar cualquier barbarie que cometa el estado genocidio de Israel.

  • 999 (comment)José M Arderiu ( ) – 19-07-2011 – 10:38:09hMuchos judíos confunden las críticas al estado neo colonialista de Israel, o a los sionistas, con la crítica a los judíos. Veamos. No todos los judíos son sionistas. Ni todos los judíos quieren vivir en el estado de Israel. Y muchos israelíes no comulgan con las atrocidades que comete casi a diario el estado genocidio de Israel, y no por ello son anti semita, eso sería decir una burrada. Por lo tanto, criticar una matanza israelí como la de Gaza 2008-2009 no es ser anti semita, es ser una persona decente, se sea judío, budista o ateo, que tanto da

The above is not very difficult to translate.

He is saying, to criticise “Zionism” and what he terms the “crimes of Zionism”,  is not to be antisemitic

Also he adds that there are many Jews who do not want to live in the Zionist state of Israel.

This about sums up what he is saying.

Will we give him a google translation:

it goes like this. promise not to laugh at the donkey bit!


José M Arderiu ( – 19/07/2011 – 11:27:02 h

Criticizing the WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY (Goldstone Report to the UN) that makes the state of Israel is not anti-Semitic, is to be a decent person. The indecent are justifying such crimes radical Zionists and supporters. This being Mr. now, not a diplomat, nor is it decent, is a radical Zionist, arrogant, which seeks to justify any barbaric genocide committed by the State of Israel.

José M Arderiu ( – 19/07/2011 – 10:38:09 h

Many Jews confuse criticism of the neo colonial state of Israel or the Zionists, with criticism of Jews. Let’s see. Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Jews want to live in the state of Israel. And many Israelis did not agree with the atrocities committed by the state almost daily genocide of Israel, and are therefore anti-Semitic, that would mean a donkey. Therefore, to criticize an Israeli massacre in Gaza 2008-2009 is not anti-Semitic, is to be a decent person is Jewish, Buddhist or atheist, which gives both


Notice: no mention in the above that Arderiu understands anything about the history of Spain towards the Jews (the pathetic translation is just about what he deserves)

1. They drove the Jews out in 1492 while winning big time with voyage of the Jew Christopher Columbus

2. the ascent of Franco was a powerful factor in the defeats of the working class that strengtherned the hand of Hitler and the Nazis, therefore the hand of Hitler and the Nazis in carrying out of the Holocaust.

It is for sure judging by the comments in the el pais newspaper that the natives of Spain have no clue about their own history, and they live in sheer ignorance of the past

This is not the fault of the Spanish, a brave and lively people.

It is the fault of the capitalist system which has created the great ignorance in the Spain of today. Also of the Stalinist “communists” as well as the social democrats of PM Zapatero et al…

The restoration of the Monarchy after Franco died was carried out aptly enough with the help of the Spanish Stalinists

The picture below was taken in 1963 and is of the leader of the Spanish Stalinist “Communists” (Santiago Carrillo) who was to play a huge role in getting capitalism back on the tracks after the death of Franco

And the Spanish have been kept in total ignorance of the past. There is the odd good film yes, but it is football 24 hours, with endless TV shows based on the wierdest gossip rubbish you have evert seen. (One woman, ex of a bullfighter is everywhere)

It is all laced with the  most sickening sentimentalism you will find. result Spanish have no time to learn history!

The Spanish have NO CLUE about any of this history. never mind the expulsion of the Jews in 1492 they have NO CLUE about the Spanish Civil War, especially the role of the Russian and Spanish Stalinists in beheading the revolution

It is all a blank slate to generations of Spanish children and youth in the Universities.

So we have our friend above in El Pais, comment 999 and comment 1000, lordly telling the Jews of Israel that their Zionism is an evil thing

The man is a total ignoramus, just like Herr Hitler was an ignoramus, and as Senor Franco also was an ignoramus

But it is not his fault. The Spanish bourgeoisie has kept him in ignorance.

As they would say in my country Ireland “As ignorant as pig shit”


But that is really doing a disservice to pigs, who are a wonderfully intelligent creature

Below is the notorious Santiago Carrillo, who knows a thing or two about the 30s that he is not telling (Andres Nin a little hint!)

Other details from this Wikipedia Commons pic

Santiago Carrillo speaking to the VI Congress of the Socialist Unity Party of Germany in 1963.
General Secretary of the Communist Party of Spain
In office
3 July 1960 – 10 December 1982
Preceded by Dolores Ibárruri
Succeeded by Gerardo Iglesias
Personal details
Born Santiago Carrillo Solares
January 18, 1915 (1915-01-18) (age 96)
Gijón, Asturias, Spain
Nationality Spanish
Political party Communist Party of Spain
Spouse(s) Carmen Menéndez

File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-B0121-0010-064, Berlin, VI. SED-Parteitag, 6.Tag.jpg

MUSLIM IN NEW YORK SELLING FOOD AS HE PULLS OUT BABY WIPES: “I got every f–king thing,” he yelled.

Pamela geller has had 2 posts recently that made me think (actually nearly all her posts do)


One was about a Muslim sellinf food on New York streets


 He pulled baby wipes out of a plastic bag as proof that he cleans his hands.
“I got every f–king thing,” he yelled.


Another was a guy on a tube who was yelling his head off at an old woman


Let us look at the guy selling food in New York. This guy according to Media Matters is supposed to be oppressed by the western system.


How oppressed? Listen to this:


Worst NYC’s dirtiest food cart vendors are ……Halal

Halal means what, exactly? Certainly not “clean.”

HalalfoodcartPhoto: file

Worst of the wurst: NYC’s dirtiest ‘alfresco’ food cart vendors NY POST (hat tip Pamela Hall)

That’s wheely gross.

Mobile food vendors racked up a stomach-turning 2,517 violations this year — ranging from poor personal hygiene, to serving up mystery meat, to live rodents — but the city Health Department doesn’t grade them or let the public know just how filthy they are.

In just four months, sidewalk slinger Bulent Isci earned 16 violations, making him the city’s vilest vendor, according to records obtained by The Post through a Freedom of Information Law request.

Isci manhandled food on the southeast corner of West 41st Street and Seventh Avenue, instead of using a utensil, and failed to wash his hands “after visiting the toilet, coughing, sneezing, smoking [or] preparing raw foods,” records show. After his first inspection in January, he failed to clean up and was cited during three more inspections in March and April.

Mubarak Ahmed broke the health code 14 times in a two-month span at his stand on West 23rd Street and Sixth Avenue, according to records. His offenses included inadequate personal cleanliness and the absence of a required sink for hand-washing.

When a Post reporter stopped by Ahmed’s stand Friday, he was scarfing down lunch — a rice-and-meat dish from a neighboring vendor — and tore an orange open with dirt-caked fingernails before serving a customer.
He told The Post that he was not aware of any violations. He pulled baby wipes out of a plastic bag as proof that he cleans his hands.

“I got every f–king thing,” he yelled.

Nur Ahammed, who usually vends in front of 56-17 56th Drive in Maspeth, Queens, was slapped this year with 14 violations for using dirty washcloths, re-serving unprotected food and serving patrons “food from unapproved or unknown source, spoiled, adulterated or home-canned.”

If vendors were treated the same way as the city’s restaurants are in the Health Department’s grading system, Ahammed’s 10 violations during a single March inspection would have earned him 33 to 53 inspection points and a C grade, the lowest possible.

And the seven city vendors who were found to have live vermin or animals scurrying in their food-preparation or storage areas — four in Queens, two in The Bronx and one in Manhattan — could have failed.
But the agency has no immediate plans to stick “scarlet letters” on food carts.

A spokeswoman said there were no immediate plans to post the mobile food vendors’ misdeeds online either.

City Councilman Daniel Garodnick (D-Manhattan) has been calling for a letter-grading system for food vendors since last year.

“If restaurants have to bear this burden, why shouldn’t vendors selling food right on the street?” he said. “People should know that the food they’re eating is safe, free of vermin and bugs, and that the seller is keeping a clean environment.”

Gone bad
According to the New York Post, the following vendors racked up the most offenses:

Bulent Isci, at 41st St. and Seventh Ave.
16 violations, including keeping foods at the wrong temperature and leaving chow unprotected from   contamination.

Mubarak Ahmed, at 23rd St. and Sixth Ave.
14 violations, including bad personal hygiene and hazardous cart conditions.

Mohammed El Hiba, at Liberty St. and Broadway.
14 violations, including bad personal hygiene and cooking foods below minimum required temperatures.

Nur Ahammed, at 56-17 56th Drive in Queens.
14 violations, including improperly using pesticides and sleeping in his food car.










 Leave Allen aside for the moment, he and his station are not big, and consider what is happening in the world today


Britain, that narrow little bigoted country, full of airs about its past, with its evil BBC at the head, are leading the public humiliation of Rupert Murdoch


This hysteria over Murdoch reminds me of the hysteria over the death of Diana


The whole setup reminds me very much of what Germany 1930 must have been like. The country is ready to explode, and for today the hate figure is Mudoch. But tomorrow it will be Israel and the Jews.


But the significance of these pictures, what is the significance? It is that a grim fate awaits the women, children and peasants of Afghanistan when the US Imperialists and Brit Imperialists pull out, washing their hands like did Pontius Pilate


And Allen with (Allen has these on all the time, and also a Southern poverty leftist crew) attacks Pamela Geller and complain about the persecution of Muslims and the misunderstanding of Islam etc.



VIDEO: Taliban Showing Brutal Execution of Pakistani Policemen, Condemns Them as “Enemies of Islam and Apostates”

Obama say, Respect it!. And so he does.

Taliban release horrific video showing execution of Pakistani policemen By Daily Mail Reporter 18th July 2011 (hat tip Paul B)

Forced into a line facing their captors, some with arms bound behind their backs, they listen silent and helpless to the Taliban commander who holds their fate in his hands.

But for these prisoners there will be no mercy. Pakistani policemen, they were captured during fighting in the north-western district of Dir.

The insurgent leader, who has come over the border from Afghanistan, condemns them as ‘enemies of Islam and apostates.’

Brutal: The Pakistan policemen are lined up by the Taliban captors as the insurgent commander (right) gives a speech listing their alleged 'crimes'Brutal: The Pakistan policemen are lined up by the Taliban captors as the insurgent commander (right) gives a speech listing their alleged ‘crimes’

Condemned to death: Moments later the shooting begins and the captives topple backwards in a hail of bulletsCondemned to death: Moments later the shooting begins and the captives topple backwards in a hail of bullets

‘They are the Pakistani police, soldiers and their supporters who recently lined up six kids in Swat and shot them execution style,’ he says, jabbing his hands at the prisoners and brandishing his gun.

‘These Pakistanis are now our captive and we will avenge the death of the children by doing the same to them.’

Second later he and his three men raise their weapons and open fire. The policemen – around a dozen in total – topple backwards in a hail of bullets.

Bloodied, they lie in the dust as their executioners continue to shoot. When the gunfire finally stops, the dusty clearing is filled with the sound of agonised groans and screams.

The camera – operated by one of the insurgents – then focuses on each of the captives in turn, lingering on their bloodied tunics and faces, many mutilated beyond recognition.

All wear the traditional baggy trousers and tunics of the region. Some are older men with greying hair and beards while others are barely older than teenagers.

Aftermath: The gunfire raises a cloud of dust and the bodies can be dimly seen through the murkAftermath: The gunfire raises a cloud of dust and the bodies can be dimly seen through the murk

Evidence: The Taliban finish each man off with a bullet to the headEvidence: The Taliban finish each man off with a bullet to the head

Against all the odds, a number of prisoners are still alive. But the Taliban do not leave anything to chance. One of the insurgents walks the line putting a bullet through each head.
Read more:





Qaddafi attacks western rebels to improve his bargaining position for ending war

DEBKAfileExclusive Report July 15, 2011, 8:00 PM (GMT+02:00)

Qaddafis’ tanks take on western insurgents





We live in bitter and hard times and the Jews of Israel and the Diaspora had better waken up and learn real lessons from Muammar Gadhafi


I think that Slobodan Milosevic learned this lesson, but learned it too late, when he was already under the control and guard of these Imperialist bastards who run the Hague Kangaroo Court


There was a time when the Serb Army was lodged in the mountains close to Kosovo, during the bombing by NATO of Serbia, that Milosevic had a chance to win.


He should not have made a deal then, because despite these brave NATO troops bombing from a mile high, the Serb army emerged after the months of bombing unscathed and undefeated.


It was then that Milosevic made a deal. He should not. He should not have ever entered into any meeting or discussion with these snakes Holbrook and co.


The big, big, lesson which the Jews seem incapable of learning is to fight these Imperialists to the very end, and never give in.


It is not that Jews are not courageous. They are totally. It is that their leaders are in synch not with revolution but with the counter revolution of the US Imperialist elite.


From the traitor and pro-Arab Livni to Netanyahu…what have the Jews gained.


Netanyahu according to Barry Chamish is very, very close to the enemy which is US Imperialism


Under such leaders will the Jews fight the enemy Imperialists to the very end, as Gadhafi has done…Hardly!


4international follow all the blogs carefully and seriously. It is in these blogs of Geller and Spencer that the real action takes place.


And we know that they all have had an equivocal position towards Gadhafi




And as was shown clearly in Bosnia and Kosovo


These Muslims are very good at fighting…just so long as their masters in NATO, in the corridors of Washington and London…send their military to fight for them.


They are indeed masters of Taqqiya!


Also we can surely say that leading all of these reactionary battles by the Muslim Brotherhood is the BBC


The BBC lies, and lies, and lies.


The British Establishment now makes a big deal in their persecution of Rupert Murdoch


While not whiter than white, the News of the World was the most honest journal in all of history in comparision to the BBC








As US Secretary of State Hillary Clintonannounced US recognition of the rebel National Transitional Council (TNC) “until a fully representational interim government can be established,” Muammar Qaddafi declared “We aim for victory – not compromise!” and launched his troops on a new operation against rebels in the west.  Clinton’s announcement to the 30-nation Libya Contact Group meeting in Istanbul, July 15, offered the key to eventually unlocking more than $34 billion in frozen assets.

debkafile reports: Qaddafi’s latest offensive began as he and his sons engaged in secret talks with the US – through Moscow – and with France and Italy – through Berlin. It was a maneuver to improve his bargaining position in the talks for ending the war against him.
The real business for terminating the war is taking place in that quiet forum, which does not include Britain and NATO, and only reflected in the deliberations of the Istanbul gathering.

Those talks were kicked off by the phone call US President Barak Obama made Thursday, July 14 to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev assigning Moscow the task of negotiating an end to the conflict based on Qaddafi’s consent to step down and hand power to an interim administration in Tripoli.

debkafile’s intelligence sources sum up the situation on the Libyan battlefield on Friday, July 15:

They dismiss the government spokesman’s charge that pro-Qaddafi forces are under rebel and NATO ground, air and naval attack in the eastern oil region of Brega as a red herring to disguise the transfer of an expanded government armored brigade from Brega to fight a separatist insurgency in the western Nafusa Mountains.
They also discount the rebel complaint that with enough arms on the western front they could have been standing now at the gates of Tripoli.

In fact, the rebels have suffered another defeat. The Libyan ruler was only stopped from moving in and taking their last strongholds around the western town of Zintan by fear that NATO would bomb his forces.

That Qaddafi felt able to move a division-sized force from eastern Libya to the west indicates that he no longer fears rebel advances around Brega in the east or Misrata in the west. Neither is he concerned about them capturing Sirte on the road to Tripoli – or even laying this key town to siege. In all the five months of their NATO-backed offensive against the regime, they never came close to that objective.
Qaddafi went on the offensive additionally to show the 30-member Libya Contact Group which army holds the upper hand on the Libyan battlefield and underscore NATO’s failure to turn the tide against him.

In recognition of that reality, the Istanbul meeting was informed by the US Secretary: “The TNC has offered important assurances today, including the promise to pursue a process of democratic reform that is inclusive both geographically and politically.” It will be recognized only “until an interim authority is in place” This means that the TNC was not recognized by the US as Libya’s legitimate government.

The formula specified by Clinton in a prepared statement was based on the understanding previously accepted by Qaddafi and sons as the basis for negotiations during their informal contacts with Washington, Paris and Rome. It is part of a political package that includes “a ceasefire to halt the civil war.”


The real nature of a cruel capitalist crisis in terminal decline is showed very clearly in the fate of Hosni Mubarak


Mubarak was the main ally of the west, that is the US and EU capitalist system and their elite, literally for decades


However the fate of Mubarak is very much a lesson especially for Israel


They used Mubarak. Then they threw him into the ditch when they had no more use for him, and when they decided to team up with out and out Fascism, that is the Islam and Sharia Law of Qaradawi.


Nothing short of the socialist revolution in the whole of the world could hope to even begin to lead the basket case of these Arab countries out of the mess.


What Mubarak and even more Muammar Gadhafi did was to hold the line against Fascism, in the shape of Sharia Jihad.


They understood this Sharia and real Islam very well. Nasser was certainly an enemy of the Jews, as indeed was Mubarak, but they stood with the Jews against Sharia.


Gadhafi actually was a wonderful aid to the US and NATO for over a decade in an alliance which Bush and Gadhafi made against Islam Sharia Jihad.


It was partly that Gadhafi was intimidated by what happened to Saddam and Iraq


But that is not the whole story. Even more fundamental the alliance between Bush and Gadhafi had at its base the opposition of the army colonel towards this crude fascist Islam Jihad, this crude theocracy, with its suppression of above all the rights of women


Again alliances with an Imperialist system in crisis are not worth one dammed penny piece, and the promises or treaties of Imperialism vanish like snow off a ditch, or like the promises made by the US Army tops with the noble American native people way back in the history of emerging American capitalism.

It is now quite obvious what has happened:


Those middle class protesters like “sand monkey”, the blogger, led the movement into the “revolution” without the slightest idea of programme or revolutionary socialist history.


They have quickly become the play things of the Muslim Brotherhood.


The Army both fears the Muslim Brotherhood but having betrayed Mubarak they also have become more like the Muslim Brotherhood themselves.


If they had wanted to fight the Muslim Brotherhood they should above everything else have stuck with Gadhafi.


Now the protesters like “Sandmonkey” get all agitated by some tycoon who made off to Spain, and they consider that the military are not repressing the Mubarak family enough


But the big danger was never the Mubarak circle. The big danger was fascism


And now they have got it…Fascism that is, but are incapable of even spelling the word Fascism



Hosni Mubarak may be dying but his military regime lives on
DEBKAfileExclusive Report July 17, 2011, 11:06 PM (GMT+02:00)

Hosni Mubarak is gone – but not his regime

“The former president Hosni Mubarak is in a full coma after his health suddenly deteriorated,” Egyptian state TV reported Sunday night, July 17, shortly after a cabinet reshuffle was carried out in Cairo to placate rising dissent five months since his overthrow.

But the reports of his state of health are conflicting: Lawyers say he went into a coma after a stroke, while the director of the Sharm el Sheikh hospital denies this.
Aged 83 and suffering from cancer, Mubarak has been confined to a Sharm el-Sheikh hospital since April when he suffered a heart attack during questioning. He and his sons face trial on August 3 on charges of corruption and murder.
The cabinet reshuffle came as Egypt sank ever more deeply into lawlessness and economic stagnation.
City streets are plagued by robbers and outlaws.  Many districts have set up vigilante militias to protect life and property. Tens of thousands continue to rally in Tahrir Square against the new rulers, the Supreme Council of Revolutionary Forces’ (SCAF) – and not only in Cairo, but in Suez, Ismailia and Alexandria. They say they are staging what they call “the second Egyptian revolution” – this one against the 25 generals led by Field Marshall Muhammad Tantawi, whom they accuse of stealing the revolution from the Egyptian people and putting the Mubarak regime back in place.

Whether or not the ousted president survives the next few hours is immaterial for the Egyptian street. debkafile’s Egyptian sources report that the demonstrators of Tahrir Square no longer believe the military junta can save the country. They suspect the generals are deliberately letting the situation deteriorate, said one opposition source, “to generate anarchy as the pretext for postponing the promised general and presidential elections, already put off once from September to November,”
“The junta wants to be sure of winning the election before it fixes on the date,” he said.

Grievances are rife: SCAF heads are accused of having 10,000 political activists detained in the last two months and subjecting some to torture – “just like in the old days.” The protesters don’t believe the Mubaraks will ever be put on trial and allege that to officials of the former regime are given derisory sentences for corruption and the authorities refrain from confiscating their ill-gotten property.

“The revolution triumphed, Mubarak was toppled, but the machinery of his regime lives on,” said another protester.

The World Bank estimates that GDP growth, running at close to 5.5 percent on Mubarak’s watch in 2010, plummeted 4.5 percent after the uprising that ousted him due to loss of tourism, industry and trade.

Egypt will be lucky to reach one percent this year.

Unemployment is rife and jobs pay a wretched wage of $50-115 a month – nowhere near enough to generate a consumer drive. Economic stagnation is a major cause of dissent.

Another red flag is the name of Egyptian multi-billionaire Hussein Salem, 76, a former intelligence agent and close friend and business associate of the Mubarak family. The military rulers are accused of turning a blind eye to his escape to Spain aboard his private jet in the early days of the uprising.

Salem is said to have been part and parcel of the former regime’s conspiracy to plunder of the national treasury. He was, for instance, awarded prize real estate on the Sharm el-Sharm Red Sea coast for building luxury hotels and the presidential palace from which Mubarak ruled the country. Salem is also accused of setting up the Egyptian-Israel natural gas transaction and raking off revenue for himself and the Mubarak family – a charge which further fans anti-Israel anger on the Egyptian street.

Egyptians are unforgiving of the cordial relations Israeli leaders maintained with the discredited president and claim that they collaborated in Hosni Mubarak’s alleged misappropriation of national funds.
The opposition believes that thanks to skullduggery by the generals Salem has been able to evade extradition despite Interpol warrants and stay safely under house arrests in Spain.

Laying hands on the absconding tycoon they are sure would also lead to the recovery of some of the plundered money.
debkafile’s Middle East sources confirm the accusation by the opposition that from the day it took over government in Cairo, the military junta SCAF has sat on its hands let the country go to rack and ruin.
Only this week, when the situation became unendurable, was a cabinet reshuffle ordered and the ministers for foreign affairs, finance and trade and industry sacked as a means of unlocking frozen aid funds to get the economy moving. Hazem El Beblawi, an economist who works as an adviser for the Arab Monetary Fund in the United Arab Emirates, was appointed finance minister and deputy prime minister.

The UAE has pledged $3 billion, Saudi Arabia $4 billion, and Qatar $500 million in aid.  Additionally, the United States has offered $2 billion.  
But the Gulf emirates have set three conditions for making these sums available:

1.  The Supreme Council in Cairo must stop working with the Obama administration.
2.   The generals must inaugurate ties full security cooperation with the Gulf Cooperation Council(GCC), meaning they must adopt an anti-Iran stance and be willing to make troops available to GCC nations in a potential war with Iran.
3.  The military rulers of Egypt must bring closure to the revolution, use the army and security forces to restore law and order and put a stop to the popular demonstrations.
The heads of the junta have not yet decided how to respond to this proposition.

If they accept, they will confirm the worst forebodings of the second wave of Egyptian revolutionaries who fear they are being stuck for the foreseeable future with a military junta instead of the democratically-elected government they dreamed of and fought for.





4international, and I think all Jews, owe Habibi a big debt of gratitude


In the picture at the end of this piece are the words:


“Don’t buy into the Israeli occupation”


4international is different and opposed to all of these real haters of Israel.


We say


 That Jews must have a place on earth where they are not molested. That place is in Zion, and Jews not only have the right, but the absolute obligation, to make their earthly abode defensible from anti-Semitism.


That also incidentally was the precise position of Leon Trotsky in everything he was writing and saying (the latter to newspapers) in the critical years of 1936 to 1940

habibi, July 17th 2011, 11:00 pm

What do you think would happen to a Tory MP who spoke at a jamboree of Russian skinheads with a long record of vicious racism and horrific violence against civilians? Especially if the MP had his own form, having promoted far right extremists on numerous occasions in the past?

I reckon he would be very harshly criticised by his fellows and possibly thrown out of the party.

But I think we can be fairly sure that no such fate awaits Jeremy Corbyn in the Labour party for doing something similar in Lebanon. He is scheduled to be one of the figures at Viva Palestina Arabia’s “summer university” session in Beirut, which starts next Saturday. It is a jamboree for extremism and terrorism. His company will include:

– George Galloway, the promoter of extremists and tyrants and funder of Hamas

– Galloway’s sidekick and fellow Hamas supporter Kevin Ovenden

– Leila Khaled, the hijacker

– Ali Fayyad of Hezbollah

– Daud Abdullah, fanatical Israel hater, Hamas supporter, and the champion of Raed Salah

– Azzam “Kaboom” Tamimi, the advocate of suicide bombing attacks on Israelis

– Creepy antisemite Tim Llewellyn

– Bulent Yildirim, head of IHH, the Turkish “charity” staffed by thugs and racists who provide political and material support to Hamas

– un-named “Hamas speakers”

– Mustapha Hamdan, a Lebanese general and a tool of the Syrian regime who has been named as a suspect in the murder of Rafik Hariri

– Salma Yaqoob of “Respect”, George Galloway’s vehicle for aggravating communal tensions in Britain

You can read the lists of speakers here (pdf) and here.

Jeremy Corbyn belongs in “Respect”.

Yet he is entirely safe in Labour. I bet no one in the party will do anything meaningful about his latest bid to help the haters.

After all, the front bench in the shape of Andy Slaughter, shadow justice minister, spoke alongside Daud Abdullah at a Palestine Solidarity Campaign meeting just this month.


Yes, in the opinion of 4international, the war against Murdoch by the Establishment in Britain is antisemitic

That aspect of the affair is hidden, but then the British Establishment are good at hiding their true feelings and real intentions!


And this is the proof


Ted Belman of Israpundit reprints very correctly the NY Sun analysis of that recent Murdoch speech and I was intending to do the same. Now we do it together.


This man is a big friend of the Jews and of Israel

The new phase of the war is what Mr. Murdoch called “the soft war that seeks to isolate Israel by delegitimizing it.”



Murdoch Warned of a War Against the Jews


[Now that Murdoch is under the gun, I thought I would remind you of his very supportive speech to the ADL last fall.]

Murdoch on Anti-Semitism

Editorial of The New York Sun | October 14, 2010

It will be some time before a major public figure confronts the question of anti-Semitism in a speech as to the point as that delivered last night by Rupert Murdoch to the annual banquet of the Anti-Defamation League in New York. The honoree of the evening, he noted that the League has been so successful that a few years ago some people were beginning to say, “Maybe we don’t need an ADL any more.” That, he said, “is a much harder argument to make these days” when, as he put it, “we live in a world where there is an ongoing war against the Jews.”

The war has, moreover, entered what the world’s most successful newspaper magnate called a new phase. The first phase had been “conventional in nature,” with the goal “to use military force to overrun Israel.” He described the approach as having failed, even before the Berlin Wall came down. Phase two was terrorism, targeting Israelis both home and abroad — “from the massacre of Israeli athletes at Munich to the second intifada.” He noted that the terrorists “continue to target Jews across the world” but observed that they haven’t succeeded in bringing down the government of Israel or weakening Israel’s resolve

The new phase of the war is what Mr. Murdoch called “the soft war that seeks to isolate Israel by delegitimizing it.” It’s a war in which, he said, “[t]he battleground is everywhere,” such as the press and broadcasting, multinational organizations and non-governmental organizations. The aim is the same, “to make Israel a pariah.” The result, Mr. Murdoch said, “is the curious situation we have today: Israel becomes increasingly ostracized, while Iran – a nation that has made no secret of wishing Israel’s destruction – pursues nuclear weapons loudly, proudly, and without apparent fear of rebuke.”

What worries Mr. Murdoch most is what he called “the disturbing new home that anti-Semitism has found in polite society — especially in Europe” and the way “violence and extremism are encouraged when the world sees Israel’s greatest ally” — America — “distancing herself from the Jewish state.” He asserted today it seems that the “most virulent strains” of anti-Semitism “come from the left,” often dressed up “as legitimate disagreement with Israel.”

He quoted Lawrence Summers’ warning, back when he was president of Harvard: “Where anti-Semitism and views that are profoundly anti-Israeli have traditionally been the primary preserve of poorly educated right-wing populists, profoundly anti-Israel views are increasingly finding support in progressive intellectual communities. Serious and thoughtful people are advocating and taking actions that are anti-Semitic in their effect if not their intent.”

Mr. Murdoch, however, did not reserve his warning merely for the university elites. He warned that anti-Semitism today “enjoys support at both the highest and lowest reaches of European society — from its most elite politicians to its largely Muslim ghettoes. European Jews find themselves caught in this pincer.” He quoted a European Commission trade minister who declared that peace in the Middle East is impossible because of the Jewish lobby in America — and, savvy editor that he is, went on to deconstruct the minister’s language, which was:

“There is indeed a belief — it’s difficult to describe it otherwise — among most Jews that they are right. And it’s not so much whether these are religious Jews or not. Lay Jews also share the same belief that they are right. So it is not easy to have, even with moderate Jews, a rational discussion about what is actually happening in the Middle East.” Quoth Mr. Murdoch: “This minister did not suggest the problem was any specific Israeli policy. The problem, as he defined it, is the nature of the Jews.”

Mr. Murdoch took on the Swedish mayor who responded to riots against a visiting Israeli tennis team by equating Zionism with ant-Semitism “and suggesting,” as Mr. Murdoch put it, “that Swedish Jews would be safer in his town if they distanced themselves from Israeli actions in Gaza.” He noted that the Norwegian government “forbids a Norwegian-based, German shipbuilder from using its waters to test a submarine being built for the Israeli navy.” He also noted that Britain and Spain are boycotting an OECD tourism meeting in Jerusalem and that in the Low Lands, police are reporting a 50% increase in the number of anti-Semitic incidents.

For Mr. Murdoch, what this underlines is the importance of good relations between Israel and America. “Some believe that if America wants to gain credibility in the Muslim world and advance the cause of peace, Washington needs to put some distance between itself and Israel,” he said. “My view is the opposite. Far from making peace more possible, we are making hostilities more certain. Far from making things better for the Palestinian people, sour relations between the United States and Israel guarantees that ordinary Palestinians will continue to suffer. The peace we all want will come when Israel feels secure — not when Washington feels distant.”

The most significant part of Mr. Murdoch’s speech, by our lights, came toward the end, when the man who owns the biggest newspaper in Britain reached down deep and spoke of the testimony presented to a British commission back in 1937 by the Zionist leader Vladimir Jabotinsky, who urged Britain to open up what Mr. Murdoch called “an escape route for Jews fleeing Europe.” He quoted Jabotinsky, who went on to write a famous book called “The Jewish War Front” and emerged as one of the Founding Fathers of Israel, as saying that only a Jewish homeland could protect European Jews from the coming calamity. Then, calling Jabotinsky’s words “prophetic,” he quoted one his most famous formulations: “It is not the anti-Semitism of men. It is, above all, the anti-Semitism of things, the inherent xenophobia of the body social or the body economic under which we suffer.”

* * *

It is still the anti-Semitism of things, and it is a radical, a newsworthy speech to say so. And it is something — we would even say inspiring — to think that the most powerful press lord on the planet can take the stage on this head and reach deep into history and conclude that Jabotinsky is a prophet for our times. Mr. Murdoch was not saying that we are on the brink of another Holocaust. “The world of 2010 is not the world of the 1930s. The threats Jews face today are different,” he said. But he was marking that we are in a serious moment. “These threats are real,” he concluded. “These threats are soaked in an ugly language familiar to anyone old enough to remember World War II. And these threats cannot be addressed until we see them for what they are: part of an ongoing war against the Jews.

Posted by Ted Belman @ 10:14 pm | 4 Comments »








File:Israel - Boycott, divest, sanction.jpg

the fight against world antisemitism has to start from here



Israel’s boycott bill has passed. According to Netanyahu: Boycott law reflects democracy in Israel it may be summarized as follows,

      According to the law, a person or an organization calling for the boycott of Israel, including the settlements, can be sued by the boycott’s targets without having to prove that they sustained damage. The court will then decide how much compensation is to be paid. The second part of the law says a person or a company that declare a boycott of Israel or the settlements will not be able to bid in government tenders.
      [..] Netanyahu said the law does not taint Israeli democracy. “What stains (Israel’s) image are those savage and irresponsible attacks on a democracy’s attempt to draw a line between what is acceptable and what is not,” he said.


“Don’t get confused,” Netanyahu continued. “I approved the law, and if I hadn’t approved it it wouldn’t have passed. I am against boycotts targeting Israel.” Netanyahu spoke of the settler families who might be affected by boycotts. “We have brothers living eleven minutes away from here, in Ma’ale Adumim. You want to get rid of Ariel and Gush Etzion? Go to the Knesset and form a government that will act that way. But hurting families and children in Ariel? I find that illegitimate .”

On Tuesday, Israeli leftist organizations launched a series of protests against the boycott law passed in the Knesset the night before.

The Gush Shalom movement took its campaign to the legal level and filed a petition to the Supreme Court claiming the boycott law is unconstitutional and anti-democratic.

Dozens of Israeli law professors protest against the boycott law

    32 academics sign petition aimed at Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein stating that boycott law is unconstitutionaland does grievous harm to the freedom of political expression and freedom of protest.

Netanyahu replied,

      “What mars its image are the reckless, irresponsible attacks against the legitimate attempt by a democracy on the defensive to draw a line between what is acceptable and what isn’t acceptable,”…
      This is a very important measure, and we on 4international support it totally
      But it is only one battle in the war. There is no use at all in this measure if Netanyahu come September, and under pressure from Obama and the EU, is going to sell out any part of Jewish land (as per the San Remo treaty of 1920)
      The overall policy of 4international, following the revolutionary traditions set down by Leon Trotsky is that Jews must have a Homeland, and that in this Homeland they must be able to live alone.
      That means that Jews decide who are guests intheir coluntry, a country do not forget is a respite from world antisemitism
      Which means we are sure of it expulsion of all who are hostile to the Jewish Homeland.
      It means also the defeat of Iran, Syria, Hamas and Hizbullah, and the realization that sad as it may be there is no alternative to war against these Jew Haters.
      Also now watch the antisemites crawl out over this one. They will say this is not democratic. But this is a most democratic measure because any measure which protects the Jews in this real and sinful world is the ultimate in democracy.
      It was through “democracy” that the Jews in 1939 to 1945 were “asked” to board the trains
      But it is real working class and internationalist proletarian and socialist democracy to have Jews living safely in their homeland, their cherished homeland of 4000 years of yearning, and not be shot at or insulted in any way.
      So real democracy for 4international means getting rid of any person who is hostile to Israel
      As my maths teacher used to write on the blackboard after solving a problem




Meanwhile, at Valley Park Middle School… The girls in the back of the room? They’re set apart and excluded because they’re menstruating, in accordance with Islamic ritual practices. (And you thought your teen years at school were awkward.) This is happening in a public, taxpayer-funded school outside of Toronto. Columnists in the Canadian media have been rightly indignant about this story, but have often stopped short of addressing the religious reason for this arrangement. One Muslim commenter on this editorial argues that there are separate restrooms for men and women, and yet no one cries foul.


There are many reasons that is a false analogy, but in particular, that red herring does not take into account what the scene pictured above says about women’s place and status in an Islamic society:

Once Allah’s Apostle went out to the Musalla (to offer the prayer) o ‘Id-al-Adha or Al-Fitr prayer. Then he passed by the women and said, “O women! Give alms, as I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire were you (women).” They asked, “Why is it so, O Allah’s Apostle ?” He replied, “You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you.” The women asked, “O Allah’s Apostle! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?” He said, “Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?” They replied in the affirmative. He said, “This is the deficiency in her intelligence. Isn’t it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?” The women replied in the affirmative. He said, “This is the deficiency in her religion.” – Sahih Bukhari 1.6.301 And once again, this is all playing out in a public school.


I am not sure of the law in Canada, but this would not be allowed just south of the border, because in America due to the historic Bill of Rights there is a strict separation of state and religion


In other words NO religion can be taught in a state school in America


This needs to be emphasised. The above scene is from a Canadian STATE school.


I am interested in the situation in Britain, Ireland, France and Spain. What IS the situation?


Thanks to Jihadwatch


Building the Land of Israel One Tree at a Time


by Josh Hasten, INN




The loud ring tone blasting from her cell phone interrupts our interview and her train of thought, but Nadia Matar answers it anyway.

Her face becomes animated. “Where is this happening?” she asks the person on the other end of the line. Nadia puts her hand over the mouthpiece and explains, “Bedouins just outside of Jerusalem near Highway One has climbed up a hilltop; they are planning to take it over. They have a bulldozer.”

After getting a few more details she hangs up the phone. “I get calls like this all the time,” she says.

The problem, explains Women for Israel’s Tomorrow (Women in Green or WIG) director, and affirmed by co-director Yehudit Katsover, is that the Arabs are trying to physically take over the entire country starting with the areas within Judea and Samaria. Their methodology is simple: create facts on the ground – plants, trees, or even small buildings and then assume complete ownership.

Ten years of working a plot is legal ground for claiming ownership in Israel. As a result, Nadia and Yehudit have mobilized using a similar approach to ensure that every meter of the ancient Land of Israel remain in Jewish hands.

But this strategy wasn’t always part of the organization’s modus operandi. Founded in 1993, upon the signing of the Oslo Accords between Israel and the PLO, WIG began staging massive weekly demonstrations throughout the country to raise awareness about the potential danger of the agreement. At that time Nadia’s father-in-law and mother-in-law, Michael and Ruth Matar, were at the helm.

During one such demonstration, a group of female activists, dressed in green, stood on Israel’s border with Samaria calling on all Israelis to “wake up” before the government shrunk the country back to the 1949 armistice lines. The image that was embedded in the media’s conscious was the green uniforms, and the nickname “Women in Green” was born and stuck ever since. Nadia insists that while Israeli women have always been at the forefront of the organization, plenty of men are involved as well.

From 1993 till the beginning of 2005, the organization was at the forefront of the “Eretz Yisrael Hashlemah (the ‘complete Land of Israel’) movement, vociferous against trading Land for a peace deal. In fact, Nadia has been arrested dozens of times throughout the years at various demonstrations, usually charged with “disturbing the peace.”

In 2005, the movement was at the head of the opposition against Israel’s planned withdrawal from Gaza. Nadia managed to sneak into the Gush Katif community of Kfar Yam and at the same time Yehudit, then a leading activist and the director of the local teacher’s college in Kiryat Arba, was in Gadid, also ini Gush Katif.

Yehudit says that until the very last minute “a lot of the people in Gush Katif were in denial regarding to what was about to happen. I was there as a realist and to inspire the residents to struggle to keep their homes and communities.” Both Nadia and Yehudit were forced to leave along with all of Gaza’s Jewish residents.

After Gush Katif, Nadia and Yehudit decided to join forces under the Women in Green umbrella, determined not to let what happened in Gush Katif repeat itself in Judea and Samaria. While the Gush Katif residents were freshly smarting from their traumatic loss after the expulsion, which the government called “Disengagement,” WIG went right back to work, but with a changed strategy.

“We understood that our methods were no longer effective” says Nadia. “Multiple demonstrations did not save Gush Katif.” Nadia says that WIG held a series of marathon meetings with Judea and Samaria leaders to strategize their next move.

In the end it was decided to change their direction entirely. Instead of organizing demonstrations the group became determined to create “facts of the ground” throughout Judea and Samaria.

The model to be implemented was based on the 1979 takeover of Beit-Hadassah in Hevron, which ultimately led to the establishment of the first Jewish community in Hevron since Israel’s founding. Yehudit herself was part of the group of ten women and their 40 children who sneaked into the historical building in the middle of the night after Pesach in that year.

After a year in the building and living under harsh conditions, one Friday night Arab terrorists murdered six yeshiva students from Kiryat Arba whose custom was to come and sing and dance outside of Beit-Hadassah to strengthen the group’s spirits. The attack along with the presence and sheer determination of the women to remain in Hevron eventually led to the Begin government’s decision to allow Jews to settle in Hevron permanently.

According to Yehudit, the campaign to establish a Jewish presence in Hevron was successful and needed to be implemented in WIG’s arsenal because of its three pronged approach: establishing a presence in the field, backing it up by an effective PR campaign targeting the general public, and lobbying politicians to endorse and support the initiative. Yehudit says that all three facets of that plan were implemented in Hevron, and the results speak for themselves.

Using that model, over the past six years WIG has strategically targeted areas throughout Judea and Samaria (mainly Judea) in order to try and establish a physical Jewish presence. Specifically the group looks to overtake unsettled State land – areas owned by the government under the jurisdiction of the Israel Land Authorities (ILA). Technically, these areas can be leased by the government to expand existing Jewish communities throughout Judea and Samaria, but because of commitments under various peace agreements, and for political reasons according to WIG, the government fails to issue building permits.

Nadia says that while these are State lands, the Arabs constantly confiscate swaths of these areas and take them over for building or agricultural purposes. “The Arabs have no claim to these areas,” says Nadia. “They are specifically designated for the expansion of Jewish communities, but that is not the case. It’s unfortunate when Arab squatters take over these areas, but nothing is enforced. That is why we feel it is integral for us to take these areas over.”

Nadia points to several WIG success stories including the clarification of the status of the Lands known as the Eitam hill, the Northern-most hill in Efrat. She says that while a local Arab family claimed the land as theirs, the fact that WIG had a constant presence on the hill and also held weekly gatherings and events for local residents, supported by Members of Knesset, led the authorities to explore the area’s true ownership. In the end it was determined that Eitam was in fact State Land belonging to Efrat, and the Arabs who claimed ownership have backed off.

Another success is the area known as Shedma, a hill on the road linking Jerusalem to the Eastern Gush communities including Tekoa and Nokdim. Shedma was the site of an old dismantled IDF base and at one point several years ago was in the process of being transferred over to the Palestinian Authority. WIG was adamantly against the move for ideological reasons, but also for security reasons since the hill which is adjacent to the road offers panoramic views of the neighboring Arab communities.

In 2008 WIG held weekly gatherings at Shedma where activists and right wing government officials would express their desire to see the hill remain in Jewish hands. As a result the government decided not to turn over the area to the PA and instead reestablished a 24/7 IDF presence there to protect Jewish motorists in the area.

Most recently, Nadia and Yehudit have been taking a “green thumb” approach to re-asserting Jewish sovereignty over State Land, by planting. A special fund called “Yibaneh” assists in funding agricultural Jewish planting in various strategic locations. The most known of these areas is the ‘Netzer’ hill, between the Gush Etzion communities of Elazar and Alon Shvut.

With a detailed map in hand, Nadia gives this reporter an extensive tour of the hill pointing out, which areas are unsettled State lands and which belong to the local Arab farmers. She shows how WIG supporters have planted hundreds of trees and vines – olives, grapes, figs and more – in order to send a message that these areas belong to Israel. The fields have turned into a game of tree “color war,” with the roots and branches of Jewish planted trees wrapped in brown protective sacks (to prevent roaming animals in the areas from grazing) while the Arabs wrap their crops using white.

Nadia details the almost weekly incidents of local Arabs who have uprooted trees and damaged watering mechanisms. “It’s ok,” she says. “If they destroy we will just come back and plant again. Sometimes it’s even good for us because when they trespass and cause damage on Jewish Land, the army is forced to come out and settle the dispute. When the army comes and brings their maps and sees that this isn’t Arab land, this just helps our case.”

Nadia recalls, “the Palestinian Authority Minister of Tourism [Khuloud Daibes] came all the way from Ramallah with about 100 friends to plant in the area. This is almost a badge of honor for us since it shows that they are so bothered by what we are doing and came all the way from Ramallah to try and thwart our efforts.”

She is grateful for the support of the local municipality in the Gush. According to Gush Etzion Regional Authority head Shaul Goldstein, “Whenever there is cooperation between WIG and his office there has been success.” He points out how the Gush municipality openly backed WIG’s efforts calling for a full time security presence at Shedma. “The result,” says, Goldstein “was excellent.” He adds that the security situation on the Eastern road to the Gush is much better today as a result.

“However our municipality must wear two hats,” Shaul adds. “We are all for the Jewish right to build in the Land of Israel, but we are the establishment, so we have to make sure what we do is completely within the law. We work very closely with the Civil Administration, the army, police on many matters and this is no different. When there is open communication and coordination most recently in places like Netzer, we [WIG and my office] are like two engines jointly pushing towards the same goal.”

When asked about the future, Yehudit says that she is “optimistic.” She says that more and more people are realizing the importance of this struggle and are willing to lend a hand. Nadia notes that this summer WIG is running a two-week summer camp for teenagers at Netzer. Activities include, of course, planting trees throughout the area and guided sessions on the importance of building in the Land of Israel. Even youngsters from the United States are flying in to participate. Both are hopeful that one day Netzer will be a new flourishing neighborhood which will connect the communities of Elazar and Alon Shvut.

Yehudit adds that “just like in the United States where you can live where you want to, there is no reason you shouldn’t be able to here. This is our land.”

In the midst of typing my phone rings, and its Nadia. She and Yehudit have been called in for questioning by the Gush Civilian administration and the area police. She explains that the previous night at about 2 a.m. a group of WIG supporters, with the help of a local Jewish farmer, planted several large olive trees on Netzer, donated by a farmer in the North. However by 7a.m. she is notified by a witness that local Arab farmers have already started chopping down the trees.

Nadia, Yehudit, and some friends rush to the scene and in her words are “confronted violently” by a group of Arabs lead by someone who is later revealed to be a known Palestinian activist. During the altercation, the police and army arrive to separate the two sides, but everyone involved is taken to the station for questioning. Six hours later Nadia and Yehudit are released, accused of trespassing and disturbing the peace, given a restraining order not to return to Netzer for 15 days while tension simmers down.

Nadia isn’t shaken. “This is a constant battle, for every piece of land. We will struggle over and over till our enemies realize that we won’t raise our hands in surrender.”









You sound so like a preacher man


And your politics lead you into an abyss of hopelessness and helplessness


Also you attack a great many of the Jewish people of Israel who do not believe in the supernatural but who are prepared to fight for Israel as much as any (believing in the supernatural) Jew.


You also are very divisive because you insult people who believe in secularism and you confuse that secularism with hatred of religion and of Jewish tradition


And where is your political programme?


If Netenyahu was elected because of Livni and Olmert betrayal, and if Netanyahu in September is preparing to betray also, what then? Apart from your preaching and slagging off atheists what do you concretely propose?


The reference above to Livni is indeed correct. I heard her in an interview and while she may be an intelligent person she spoke in a dreary and mechanical fashion, mainly because her programme, and also the programme of what you call the “Left” is indeed also dreary. Her words were in synch with her programme.


There is need now for a revolutionary leadership in Israel. But in saying so I place down one caveat, which is that when Israeli political leaders like Netanyahu come under attack from anti-Semites in US and EU, as well as from anti-Semitic Jews in Israel, then he must be defended, critically, but defended nevertheless. I am not going to enter into a barging match over Leon Trotsky, but for sure the time has come to build a Trotskyist party in Israel, which will place itself at the forefront of the struggle, and will seek to create a unity with patriotic Jews who fight from the perspective of Judaism


My website is




The path to the next Lebanon War

July 12, 2011, 2:42 AM









Five years ago this week, Iran’s Lebanese proxy opened war with Israel. The war lasted 34 days, during which Hezbollah launched more than 4,000 missiles against Israel. Now five years later, under US President Barack Obama, America is pushing a policy that drastically escalates the chance that a new war between Israel and Iran’s Lebanese army will break out again in the near future.


Back in 2006, Israel’s response to Hezbollah’s aggression was swift but incompetent. While Israel scored some blows against the Iranian proxy force, the war ended with Hezbollah still shooting. Israel failed to defeat the terror army. And because Hezbollah survived, it won the war.


This truth is exposed in all its ugliness by the political and military realities five years on. Today, Hezbollah is not simply in charge of Israel’s former security zone in South Lebanon.


It is in charge of all of Lebanon. The Hezbollah-controlled government controls all aspects of the Lebanese state that it wishes. These include the military, the telecommunications networks, and the international borders, airports and sea ports, among other things.


Today, Hezbollah has not merely refilled its depleted missile arsenals. It has tripled the size of its missile arsenals. In 2006, IAF strikes in the first 24 hours of the war knocked out all of Hezbollah’s long-range missiles. Today, not only have those stocks been replenished, Hezbollah’s arsenal includes missiles with ranges covering all of Israel, with larger payloads and many with guidance systems.


The lessons of the war are easy to see. And the Israeli public, which learned them five years ago, still hasn’t forgotten them.


GENERALLY SPEAKING, the war taught us three lessons. The first lesson is that you can’t convince terrorists to lay down their arms simply by walking away. Israel withdrew from its security zone in southern Lebanon in 2000. The withdrawal was a precursor to its withdrawal from Gaza in 2005. In 2006, Israel was attacked from both territories.


In the lead-up to both withdrawals, Israel’s national leadership told the public that the only reason terrorists from these territories were attacking us was that we were there. If we went away, they would stop hating us and we would be safe. We were the problem, not them, so we could solve the problem by giving them what they wanted.


Although then-prime minister Ehud Olmert and then-foreign minister Tzipi Livni continued to push appeasement through their insistence that Israel surrender Judea and Samaria, the war of 2006 showed the public the folly of their plans. And at first opportunity, the public elected the Likud and other right-wing parties – which oppose appeasement – to form the current government.


The second lesson the public learned is that when a nation goes to war against an enemy that seeks its destruction, it must fight to win. You cannot fight a half-war against an implacable foe. And if you fail to win, you lose.


This is not how Israel fought the war of 2006. Partially due to pressure from then-secretary of state Condoleezza Rice and partially due to his own strategic incomprehension, Olmert believed it was possible to fight to a draw without losing.


In the event, there was only one way for Israel to defeat Hezbollah – by regaining control over southern Lebanon. Any other conclusion to the war would leave Hezbollah standing. And simply by surviving intact, as Lebanese Druse leader Walid Jumblatt warned at the time, the road would be paved for Hezbollah to take over Lebanon.


But Olmert – and Livni – wouldn’t even consider retaking control of South Lebanon. The option was discarded contemptuously as a delusional recipe for forcing Israel back into the “Lebanese quagmire.” The fact that the “Lebanese quagmire” came to Israel after we left Lebanon, and that it will only end when Israel defeats Hezbollah, was completely ignored.


Olmert’s and Livni’s reason for rejecting the one strategy that would have brought Israel victory is explained by the third lesson of the war. That lesson is that once a leader is ideologically committed to a policy of appeasement, he is unable to allow rational considerations to permeate his thinking.


THE OLMERT government was elected in 2006 on the basis of its plan to repeat the Lebanon and Gaza withdrawals in Judea and Samaria. During the war, Olmert told his supporters that victory in Lebanon would enable him to carry out his planned withdrawal from Judea and Samaria. And this was true. But because of the circular logic of appeasement, there was no way that Olmert could fight to win.


If Israel had retaken control of southern Lebanon, Olmert would have had a chance of convincing the public that unilateral withdrawal was a viable strategy. He would have been able to argue that just as the IDF retook control of southern Lebanon, so it would retake control of Judea and Samaria if the Palestinians used the vacated lands to attack the rest of the country.


But because he was committed to appeasement, Olmert could not fight to win in Lebanon. The appeasement agenda is predicated on the disavowal of the notion of military victory and the embrace of the mantra, “There is no military solution.”



If victory is an option, then surrender along the lines that Olmert preached in Judea and Samaria is also an option. That is, surrender is an option, not an imperative, as he claimed. And if victory is an option, then clearly it has much more to recommend it than defeat.


But with their appeasement agenda reigning supreme – as appeasement agendas always do – instead of fighting to win, Olmert and Livni sued for a cease-fire. That is, they sought a diplomatic solution to a military problem. And since by not losing, Hezbollah won the military contest, it also came out the victor in UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which set the conditions of the cease-fire.


Resolution 1701 was a massive victory for Hezbollah. The resolution placed the international terror group run by Iran on equal footing with Israel, a sovereign state. The security arrangements in the resolution were an invitation for Hezbollah to rearm. It was pure fantasy to believe that the Hezbollah-dominated Lebanese government would block Hezbollah’s rearmament. And it was utter madness to think that European military forces would lift a finger to prevent Hezbollah from reasserting full control over the border with Israel.


But again, if you accept the circular logic of appeasement – that always puts the burden of proof on the non-aggressor – then you will never learn these, or any other lessons. And as a consequence, appeasers will always and forever foment wars in the name of peace.


THE ISRAELI public learned these lessons and elected a government that understands them. Perhaps if the American people had elected Senator John McCain to succeed George W. Bush in 2008, the US government would have learned these lessons as well. And then maybe together the Israeli and the US governments might have set about fixing at least some of the damage the war caused them both.


But in their wisdom, the American people elected Barack Obama to succeed Bush in the White House. And Obama has learned none of the lessons of the last war. Consequently Obama’s current policies are increasing the likelihood of another war between Israel and Iran’s Lebanese proxy in the near future.


Far from recognizing the nature of Hezbollah, the Obama administration has tried to wish away its implacability. Last May, Obama’s counter-terrorism adviser John Brennan spoke of the administration’s plan to cultivate “moderate elements” in the Iranian-run jihadist organization.


The Obama administration’s notion that the US can adopt a nuanced approach to the terror group is put paid by Hezbollah’s takeover of the Lebanese government, its growing capabilities in the Western hemisphere, its continued devotion to the cause of Israel’s destruction, its participation in the killing of Syrian anti-regime protesters, and Iran’s clear control over all aspects of the organization’s operations. And yet, by all accounts, the administration refuses to acknowledge that there can be no nuance toward Hezbollah.


The dangers of Obama’s rejection of these basic truths were exposed this week. Sunday the government approved the demarcation of Israel’s territorial waters along the border with Lebanon. The borders will be submitted to the UN.


Israel’s move was forced on it by the Obama administration.


The dispute over the sea border arose after Israel discovered massive quantities of natural gas in its territorial waters in 2009. Acting on orders from Hezbollah and Iran, the Lebanese government immediately claimed erroneously that the waters belonged to Lebanon. Last August, Lebanon submitted its claim to the UN.


Israel negotiated its maritime borders with Cyprus in 2007. The same year, Cyprus also negotiated its maritime borders with Lebanon. At the time, Lebanon did not claim the areas in which Israel has discovered natural gas deposits or the areas abutting those areas, which are suspected of similarly containing large natural gas deposits. Lebanon’s current claim includes Israel’s territorial waters abutting the gas fields it discovered in 2009.


In staking this false claim, as it did with the Shaba Farms on Mount Dov in the Golan Heights in 2000, Lebanon is setting up a casus belli against Israel.


Under the circumstances, the only rational policy that the US can possibly adopt is to loudly and strenuously back Israel’s claim and reject all Lebanese contentions to the contrary.


Only by completely rejecting Lebanon’s claim can the US deny Hezbollah and Iran the ability to use Israel’s gas finds in its territorial waters as a justification for war.


Rather than do this, guided by its appeasement ideology, the Obama administration has refused to take sides. It urged Israel to submit its counter-claim to the UN – where it can bully Israel into accepting arbitration of the dispute by the inherently anti-Israel UN.


More generally, by refusing to take sides, the US is in fact siding with its enemy Iran and Iran’s proxy Hezbollah against its ally Israel.


Originally published in The Jerusalem Post. 


Thanks to Caroline Glick on