THE GUARDIAN LETS SLIP ITS DEEP ANTISEMITISM AS A REPORTER INSINUATES JEWS ARE BEHIND THE RIOTS!

File:London Met Police riot gear.jpg

 

CommentisFree WATCH has noted the Fascist Anti-Semitism on The Guardian, picked up also by Pamela Geller

 

This Watch group has its work cut out for it. We support it and its work but critically.

 

Critically because CIF Watch has not made an analysis of what exactly they are fighting. From our point of view the Guardian is not just a group gone astray but is the centre of the real nazi movement in Britain and Europe, which is based on the army, police, criminal class especially criminal class and “lumpen” youth, the labour and Trade Union bureaucracy, the Monarch and the Tory ruling elites. To that you can add the Churches, especially the Catholic and established Anglican, and the new force of Islam and Sharia. Guardian and Independent is the spearhead of all of this. It is perfect grounds for the development of a police military dictatorship over the still strong English working class movement, which will be disguised of course, and a factor in this disguise is that English national identity was perforce tinged with racial superiority, and in recent decades has been shredded by multiculturalism. Multiculturalism equals in practice No Culture at all!

 

 

CONCLUSION

 

CommentisFree “Watch” have it about right in the above. It is the lacing of what I described at the beginning with Jew Hatred on the part of the Guardian that is the essence of the situation in Britain today.

 

You will find that no matter what is happening in British politics, and it will change weekly, the Jew Hatred in Britain remains as the constant.

 

They try to hide it. After all Hitler was very careful every step of the way. They know, these anti-Semites.

 

From CIF watch via atlas shrugs

Guardian report on London riots omits the race or ethnicity of rioters – but, still mentions Jews CiF Watch

The Guardian’s Editorial Code may not include any prohibition against licensing voices who are openly anti-Semitic, providing a platform to members of a terrorist group, nor legitimizing those who seek the Jewish state’s destruction, but does include the following:

“In general, we do not publish someone’s race or ethnic background or religion unless that information is pertinent to the story. We do not report of the race of criminal suspects unless their ethnic background is part of a description that seeks to identify them or is an important part of the story (for example, if the crime was a hate crime”

Yet, in a 1800 word Guardian report on the London riots, by Paul Lewis, titled, “Tottenham riots: a peaceful protest, then suddenly all hell broke loose, Aug. 8, which doesn’t mention the race, ethnicity, or religion of the rioters, somehow found it pertinent to note that some of those who gathered to jeer police were, allegedly, Hasidic Jews. 

“The make-up of the rioters was racially mixed. Most were men or boys, some apparently as young as 10….But families and other local residents, including some from Tottenham’s Hasidic Jewish community, also gathered to watch and jeer at police. [emphasis mine]

So, the rioters – who have torched, ransacked and looted shops, pubs, banks and even residential properties, and have attacked journalists, police, and firefighters for the past three days – are characterized by Lewis as merely “racially mixed”, yet he somehow deems it relevant to note that some of Tottenham’s Hasidic Jewish community were among those who allegedly watched and “jeered” police.  

To the Guardian, the particular race, ethnicity, or religious affiliation of the rioters is of no particular significance, but the religion of a few of those who reportedly witnessed the police response to the riots is apparently worth noting.

What possible relevance, per the Guardian’s own code of ethics, does the religious background of some of those who reportedly jeered police have?

Why wasn’t the race, ethnicity, or religious background of others who witnessed the riots and/or jeered police mentioned? 

Is there really any question that Lewis’s report represents a flagrant violation of the Guardian’s Editorial Code

 

READ ALSO

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/08/notorious-judeophobic-guardian-reports-on-london-riots-omits-the-race-or-ethnicity-of-rioters-but-st.html#more

 

CONCLUSION

 

CommentisFree “Watch” have it about right in the above. It is the lacing of what I described at the beginning with Jew Hatred on the part of the Guardian that is the essence of the situation in Britain today.

 

You will find that no matter what is happening in British politics, and it will change weekly, the Jew Hatred in Britain remains as the constant.

 

They try to hide it. After all Hitler was very careful every step of the way. They know, these anti-Semites.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s