THE CENTRIFUGES ARE SPINNING AS WE SPEAK…NETANYAHU WARNS

 

WE MUST REMEMBER THAT IN IRAN WE ARE DEALING WITH A TRUE FASCIST MOVEMENT

 

It is based on antisemitism, hatred of Jews. Along with that it is based on the Islam programme of conquering the world for Islam.

 

When Islam emerged it was not a Fascist movement because we insist that Fascism is a word to be used only in the context of Fascism as a modern and contemporary phenomenon.

 

Leon Trotsky wrote most about Fascism, analysing it from every angle, and insisted that Fascism was a method of rule which is connected to the historical decline of the Capitalist system.

 

Robert Spencer has produced a brilliant and timely book which insists that Islam as a method of thought and practice was patched together as a system AFTER the Arab conquests. It was quite specific to those conquests.

 

But everything changes and adapts to new circumstances.

 

Iran and Islam must be connected consciously to the present terminal decline in world capitalism

 

There are forces now emerging within capitalism itself which feel threatened by this new form of Iranian/Hamas/Hizbullah fascism. It depends on Israel to act and on the Jews to act to defend themselves.

 

The key, and the difficult part for Israel and the Jews, is that they must act on many fronts. Israel is threatened on all of these fronts.

 

  1. Obama who is essentially antisemitic and who also puts his electioneering before the safety of millions of Jews
  2. The Power’s programme of “Responsible to Protect” which is also the source of the New Fascism

 

The following notes by Debka make it clear that there ARE forces in the world feeling seriously threatened by Iran Fascism. But Israel must act and we on the outside must stand up and be counted in defence of the Jews once more:

 

 

 

DEBKAfileExclusive Report April 26, 2012, 5:30 PM (GMT+02:00)

Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz meets top US soldier Gen. Martin Dempsey in Washington

Israel Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu acted Thursday, April 26, to correct the damaging impression of divided and uncertain perceptions of the Iranian nuclear threat left by statements delivered in the last two days by himself and Defense Minster Ehud Barak.
Israel’s chief of staff Gen. Benny Gantz rallied to the task with an unambiguous comment that “other countries have readied their armed forces for a potential strike against Iran’s nuclear sites to keep Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons. The military force is ready. Not only our forces but other forces as well,” he said without elaborating.

“We all hope it will not be necessary to use this force, but we are absolutely sure of its existence.”
debkafile reports from Washington that Gen. Gantz’s words were seen in US official circles as the strongest affirmation yet from Jerusalem that Israel has partners for a direct attack on Iran’s nuclear sites.
It was also an attempt by the chief of staff to erase the question mark he placed in a previous comment over Iran’s resolve to attain a nuclear weapon.  

Wednesday, April 25, debkafile reported widespread criticism on the Israeli street and in military circles of the mixed and conflicting messages coming from top officials with regard to the Iranian peril. Netanyahu also responded to the criticism in person by declaring in a TV interview, “Iran hasn’t stopped its program …the centrifuges are spinning as we speak.”

BREITBART REPRESENTS THE MOST PROGRESSIVE FORCE IN AMERICA

No doubt about it, the place to be if you want to understand where the American people and the American working class are going, is on www.breitbart.com

Obama is at the centre of all of these moves against the American people and the American workers because Obama has got no respect for the great American Revolution and the great American Constitution, the great American tradion of Free Speech.

Obama is in no way of the left, not a socialist, is a raging Imperialist, but his politics chime with a disgustingly disorientated Stalinist left.

The new Fascism in the world is going to come partly out of these circles. And it will be laced with antisemitism as is seen in a recent use of an antisemitic cartoon by a section of the anti Wall Street movement.

As the world capitalist system hurls into economic crisis so the need to turn to Fascism. So the need to do away with democratic rights as contained in the American traditions.

It must be emphasised that Obama does not represent the black workers of America. He does the precise opposite. Because black workers like white workers, and even polka dot workers, need ALL their rights in order to defend themselves against dictatorship.

Obama represents the dictatorship of capital.

This story about this woman called Kagan shows how Obama had her appointed to the Supreme Court in order to do away with these basic rights of the American people and the American working class. The contempt which Obama and Kagan on the Supreme Court have for these traditional basic democratic righnts is exposed by Breitbart’s writer.

Starts here:

Breitbart News has discovered previously unknown handwritten notes from Elena Kagan to radical professor Derrick Bell, sent to Bell as Kagan worked on his seminal 1985 article on Critical Race Theory in the Harvard Law Review (99 Harv. L. Rev. 4).

The notes, which were not among materials presented to the Senate during Justice Kagan’s confirmation hearings, are preserved among Bell’s papers at the New York University archives.

Kagan’s work on Bell’s article was revealed in 2010 by Harvard Law School professor Charles Ogletree, after President Barack Obama nominated her to the Supreme Court. Ogletree cited her “phenomenal edits” on Bell’s “classic” article. 

Bell’s article, “The Civil Rights Chronicles,” combined exposition and fiction to argue that the Constitution was–and remains–tainted by white supremacy, and that the United States awaited “a common crisis that will overcome racism” through radical constitutional reform.

Unlike then-Harvard Law Review president Carol Steiker, who corresponded with Bell via typed letter (apparently on a 1980s-vintage dot matrix printer), Kagan chose to write to Bell exclusively on yellow notepad paper. She did not explain her choice to write by hand, save to suggest in one note on Aug. 30, 1985 that she was pressed for time.

Most of Kagan’s notes to Bell concern minor editorial comments on the “Chronicles,” as she and the other editors prepared his article for publication. One interesting passage concerns a legal question that Kagan and Steiker posed about Bell’s attempt to argue for a new constitutional right–a “substantive due process right” to “racial healing”:

As Carol and I told you on the phone, we’re a little bit concerned at the focus on this part of the piece. The doctrinal section centers on the idea of creating a substantive due process right to racial healing. But the reader is left wondering: why wouldn’t the Court strike these laws down on first amendment grounds? It strikes me that the Court would indeed strike these laws down on the ground of free speech or free association.

The section of the article to which Kagan was referring was entitled “The Chronicle of the Slave Scrolls.” In it, the main character, Geneva Crenshaw (who would recur in many of Bell’s writings) tells a fable about finding parchment scrolls on the west coast of Africa inside a model of a slave ship. 

The scrolls “simply taught the readily available but seldom read history of slavery in America” as related by those who had lived through it. Crenshaw relates that the discovery of the scrolls inspired black Americans to meet in “healing groups” that inspired them to compete more fiercely for achievement and respect–until a “television minister” warned that the scrolls were inciting racial hatred by teaching about old evils. States then passed “Racial Toleration Laws” that prohibited any teaching about the history of racial conflict, and blacks eventually acquiesced.

The lesson, Crenshaw says, is that “[t]he Constitution protects the efforts of black people only when those efforts leave vested interests undistured [sic].” 

Bell, through the narrator, provides the solution in the form of “a substantive due process right that barred government interference with the racial healing sessions,” based on the same

 right to privacy recognized in Roe v. Wade as part of a “penumbra” of constitutional protections. Bell’s narrator says a right to “racial healing” would give special protection to the idea that “the racism of whites rather than the deficiencies of blacks causes our lowly position in this society.” 

Crenshaw–perhaps echoing Kagan’s note–is skeptical that the Court would grant such a right. Bell’s answer is “skillful lawyering” and “a more liberal Court”; Crenshaw later replies that only a “common crisis” will bring the needed change.

As Solicitor General, Kagan cheered when Obama seized a national “crisis” to pass unrelated legislation whose goal is to create an effective right to health care. She has not recused herself from the subsequent Obamacare case, as she has from today’s suit over Arizona’s immigration law, in which her “skillful lawyering” played an important role.

If Obama is re-elected, Kagan could be part of the “more liberal court” Bell envisioned–and great changes in constitutional jurisprudence could be the result.

DIRTY NUCLEAR BOMB IN THE HANDS OF HIZBULLAH WILL CAUSE GREAT KILLING OF THE JEWS ONCE AGAIN

Antisemitism in countries in Europe and the antisemitism of Obama provides the cover for a great killing of the Jews in Israel.

This is a most serious warning to the world. It now emerges from this debka article that we have been concentrating on the wrong thing. We have been thinking of a rocket attacking Israel with a nuclear bomb on board.

But what debka has made clear here is that iran has the enriched uranium on hand, and that the trigger facility is on hand also. Hence Hizbullah on the border with Israel, essentially protected by UN forces, can explode dirty bombs against Israel.

But that would harm Arabs also, some antisemites may argue. The answer to that is the concept of suicide bombing. That specific concept makes that thought irrelevant.

Jew hatred is what drove Hitler and Jew hatred is what drove Hajj Amin el Husseini.

As Israeli leaders wrangle over Iran, a new US spy agency will deal with Tehran
DEBKAfileExclusive Report April 25, 2012, 5:38 PM (GMT+02:00)

Some fear they’ve missed the boat.

Israeli leaders were harshly criticized on the eve of Israel’s 64th Independence Day for too much speechifying and no real action against a nuclear Iran, whereas the US in contrast finally made a move by establishing a new Pentagon spy agency for gathering intelligence inside Iran. April 24 and 25, when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak addressed memorial ceremonies for the fallen, they reiterated the same old “Israel will not permit Iran to acquire nuclear arms” – a remark which the Israeli street has stopped taking seriously. Many members of military and intelligence circles are quoted by debkafile as believing that Israel may have waited too long and, along with the US, lost the initiative.
Jerusalem and Washington are still at odds on Iran, but the theme of their dispute has shifted. It is no longer about Iran’s timeline for building a bomb, but what kind. They agree that Tehran will not possess advanced nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles capable of penetrating the US and Israeli missile defenses any time soon. Israel is now worried about more primitive devices like the ones in the North Korean and Pakistani arsenals which Israeli believes are in the final stages of constructions.
The question in Israeli intelligence circles is this: Why is the impending North Korean nuclear test considered by the US, Japan and South Korea a major menace while no one seems to care about devices identical to the one Pyongyang plans to explode on the way to operational capability.

Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Strategic Affairs Moshe Ya’alon said publicly earlier this month that by the end of 2012, Iran would have a dirty bomb.
His disclosure drew no reactions, although it was a warning. A dirty bomb combines radioactive material with conventional explosives. Its chief danger is the spread of radioactive contamination. Cruder and cheaper to producer than a nuclear bomb, counter-terror agencies have long appreciated that it is easily transferred to terrorists. Ya’alon’s warning therefore means that Iran may soon be able to transfer dirty bombs to the Lebanese Hizballah units sitting on Israel’s northern border and the Palesinian Hamas and Jihad Islami in Gaza.
The Weekly Standard edition for publication on April 30 wrote the following sentence: “The supreme leader and his guards can have a nuclear weapon in their hands in as little as 43 days, provided Iran’s nuclear scientists have mastered the manufacture of a nuclear trigger – technically much less difficult than enrichment.”

The UN nuclear watchdog in Vienna and US intelligence officials have reported tests on nuclear materials conducted in recent weeks at the Parchin site near Tehran, to which access has been denied UN inspectors.

In Washington, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced was the formation of a new Pentagon spy agency called the Defense Clandestine Service. Defense Department sources said the new organization would expand the military’s intelligence and secret war efforts outside war zones in areas insufficiently covered until now, indicating deep penetration inside hostile territory, primarily Iran.

Other sources point out that by creating a new in-house Pentagon spy agency, Panetta and President Obama demonstrated their opinion of the quality of intelligence they were receiving from the CIA, of which the defense secretary was director until recently.

IF YOU CANNOT DEFEND ASSAD YOU CANNOT DEFEND ISRAEL EITHER (FROM RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT)

There is a lengthy discussion on Israpundit on Powers and “Responsibility to Protect”. These Jewish leaders in the Diaspora are in total crisis because they do not know how to fight against the phenomenon of the “Arab Spring” which is at the same time the fight against Fascism, and indeed the alliance of the capitalist powers with Islam is the making of the modern Fascist Movement.

In this context the word that is never mentioned by Ted belman, Pamela Geller, Spencer and others is Marxism or Trotskyism. Rather than the truth they try to muddy the waters on Leon Trotsky and his defence of the Jews and the Israel in the making.

I wrote the following in a comment (url below) and please understand that if you do not defend the disreputable Assad against this Fascism of “Responsibility to Protect” then you do not defend the Jews and Israel either.

 

{This is the comment}

Let us get one thing crystal clear. If anybody thinks that Romney as a Republican President would not support “responsibility to protect” then please think on, and keep on thinking.

Heck even the editor of Israpundit Ted Belman backed up a bloodthirsty call of a noted Jewish American organization on this very site to bomb the living bejasus out of Gadhafi. It is true that Ted pulled back from this but it is on record that I immediately attacked this position, which is also not only the death-knell of sovereign states as under Gadhafi but also is the end of the road for the Jewish state of Israel.

Israel and its present leaders, which includes also the total leadership in the Diaspora (the leadership of the Jews has many differing strands, being traditionally a broad church, which is good and bad actually), and includes people like Ted and Gerry Gordan plus a thousand others, are sitting ducks. This is the result of political cowardice, of deep bias against new perspectives rooted in Judaism and in the conservatism of Judaism, which historically this conservatism has its good and bad aspects.

From the beginning of the crisis in Yugoslavia I recognized that THAT was “responsibility to protect” and I fought for the independence of the Serb people to fight to hold together their unified state of Yugoslavia, while people like Gerry Gordon did not lift a finger to defend Yugoslavia, but rationalised its break-up.

Ted was shaky on this at the beginning but a chap called Bill from Canada, a lawyer, disgraced Jews forever by sitting on the fence, while Yamit82 disgraced the memory of Yamit 1982 by launching the most vicious slanders against the Serbs, culled from disreputes like Hoare.

Came to Egypt Yamit82 and others found every reason under the sun NOT TO defend Mubarak from the Muslim Brotherhood and US Imperialism cum EU cum UN cum NATO.

Ben Ali was no different, Gaghbo no different, Gadhafi no different, and now Assad.

Funny that! Not talking about THAT, eh!

There is no point at all in moaning about Power and “responsibility to protect” if you do not actively defend Assad against just this very same thing.

The thing about Ted, the “weaselie” yamit82, Gordon, Mr Barry Rubin and a thousand other Jews, (I say Jews but remember that each and every one of these speaks only for themselves) is that they can always find the words to be utterly hypocritical.

So the opposition to Obama/Powers on Syria fell to the Stalinists of China and Russia and that is an unstable foundation, because the Stalinists are reactionary to the core. They always end up supporting Imperialism because Stalinism is a creation of Imperialism, and are not Marxists, are in opposition to Marxism.

Ayers was a creation of the CIA and Jared Israel has detailed how he and his girl friend split a promising student movement in the 60s which was seeking to link the students with the American workers.

So please do not refer to Ayers as a Marxist unless you are either intellectually challenged or wilfully dishonest.

Same applies also to our friend Obama. Obama a Marxist ha ha ha!

All the evidence points to the murky hand of the CIA behind Obama also. Do not forget that the CIA protected Eichmann in South America until the Jews busted the CIA post 45 racket and caught that piece of filth.

And just remember that if you cannot defend Assad from Annan then you had best shut up about this “responsibility to protect”, and when the NATO descends on the Jews in Israel as they did on the Christians in Kosovo keep your hypocritical mouths firmly shut there also.

You have to be consistent to be believed.

http://www.israpundit.com/archives/45393/comment-page-1#comment-157592

BREIVIK TOTALLY DISORIENTATED AND MAD ABOUT METHODS

HE REPRESENTS THE MADNESS OF INDIVIDUALISM

 

AND THIS DOES OFTEN LEAD TO MADNESS

 

JIHADWATCH HAS HAD THIS TRANSLATED FOR THEIR BLOG:

 

Breivik rejects Fjordman as inspiration: “It is ridiculous to conduct a witch hunt against Fjordman. He is against violence and for democracy”

Recent JihadWatch posts on Breivik: “Main source for Norway mass murderer Breivik’s twisted worldview: Wikipedia“, “Norway mass murderer Breivik reveals his true inspiration: ‘We have drawn from al-Qaida and militant Islamists’

Translated from Norwegian by Nicolai Sennels, Nyhetene April 18: “Breivik rejects Fjordman as inspiration“:

It was a more confrontational atmosphere in court Wednesday, when Anders Behring Breivik continued his explanation. Breivik was grilled about his trip to Liberia and London in 2002, but said repeatedly that he did not want to answer questions about these trips. Lawyers asked Breivik whom he felt inspired by, and Breivik denied that he was inspired by the blogger Fjordman.“It is ridiculous to conduct a witch hunt on Fjordman. He is against violence and for democracy,” Breivik said in court.

Breivik also testified that concerning his methods he was inspired by Al-Qaeda. Breivik was also asked about his opinion on Adolf Hitler. Breivik explained that he himself was an anti-Nazi.

Breivik clarified his views on immigration.

“A national socialist wants all non-Norwegians thrown out of the country. I am much more liberal. I can accept a small percentage of immigrants, but not that Norwegians will be a minority. I have a duty to prevent my ethnic group from being destroyed. This belongs to the human rights,” said Breivik.

 

Posted by Nicolai Sennels on April 20, 2012
 
 
 

 

 

UNDER LIVINGSTONE AND THE FASCIST LEFT THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY HEADS TO BECOME FASCISTS

Lucy Lips, April 20th 2012, 8:56 am

The East London Advertiser reports:

Mayor Lutfur Rahman’s nominated independent candidate Gulam Robbani took the seat with 1,030 votes.

Robbani, one of the Mayor’s former aides who had been contracted to advise him on social care before quitting in February, beat Labour’s Ala Uddin into second place by just 47 votes out of a total 2,315 cast.

Labour had pinned its hopes on former council deputy leader Uddin to retake the seat it lost when Cllr Shelina Akhtar, who won it for them in 2010, defected last year to Mayor Rahman’s independent administration.

The by-election was caused by Akhtar being jailed in January for council benefit fraud.

The Mayor was out campaigning himself in the week, door-knocking with Robbani who is now almost certain to be offered a place in his cabinet.

Conservatives came third and Greens fourth, pushing Lib Dems into fifth place.

The results:

Gulam Robbani (independent) – 1,030 [elected]

Ala Uddin (Labour) – 987

Matthew Smith (Conservative) – 140

Kirsty Blake (Green) – 99

Richard Macmillan (Liberal Democrat) – 39

The turn-our was 31 per cent.

If Ken Livingstone wins, the case he will make – forcefully – within the Labour Party, is that the party should adopt a “Bradford Spring” strategy, in order to win seats such as these.

LT. COL. EISNER HAS THE SUPPORT OF 4INTERNATIONAL ALSO

 

WE ADD OUR VOICE TO THIS COMMENT BY NORMAN ON ISRAPUDIT

 

I’ll sign it when its posted and spread the word.

A patriot and a good man deserved far better than to be railroaded and not even being allowed to present a defense.

Lt. Col Eisner deserves every one’s support

 

WE THEREFORE BACK UP THIS PETITION PUT FORWARD BY ISRAPUNDIT EDITOR TED BELMAN:

 

We demand that the Prime Minster Netanyahu reinstate Lt. Col. Shalom Eisner immediately to his former position and rank.

 

Lt Col Eisner should be commended for executing his difficult mission rather than be dismissed.

We demand that the IDF should be more concerned with creating deterrance rather than projecting a nice image.

We demand that the IDF be more concerned with protecting the lives of its soldiers rather then the lives of Arab civilians.

We demand that the IDF support its officers and soldiers when they make decisions in the field rather than undermine them so that they are reluctant to make choices