OBAMA WAS DEFINITELY LYING…STEPHENS WAS NOT MURDERED AS A RESULT OF THE FILM AT ALL

 

(THE ISSUE OF THE BENGHAZI SLAYING OF STEPHENS GROWS AND GROWS IN IMPORTANCE AND DEPTH)

The Obama Regime is really the same as a Plague of Lies. There has never been such a thing in America. It makes the Nixon regime saintly in its truthfulness in comparision.

 

In anything to do with Islam in the world today, especially in Egypt Libya and Tunisia, they lie lie lie!

 

The exposure of these lies which is happening every minute now raises a whole new insight into the lies which were told about Yugoslavia during the 1990s.

 

It also raises the issue of the trials in the Hague, in what we call the Hague kangaroo Court. It is ALL interconnected.

 

This is an immediate conditional response and it is a deep psychosis which is not just, of course, the Obama Government but lies deep within Christian and Western Society, at any rate a very large part of it (return to that thought later)

 

It was clear in Debate Number 2 that Obama was in lying mode when Romney came to the issuie of the Benghazi murder of the Amarican Ambassador Stephens.

 

Obama had prepared well for this and he knew that he had used the word “terrorist” or “terrosism” when he spoke in the White House Garden the day after the attack. That would be September 12. Keep dates in mind here. Time in this is vitally important.

 

It was a throwaway word like “we oppose all terrorism”.

 

Obama was NOT saying on that September 12 that the attack on Stephens was a terrorist attack. He was saying the very opposite.

 

He and his whole Government were saying that it was a NATURAL and UNDERSTANDABLE bit of anger expressed by poor oppressed Muslim Victims against the making of a “quite horrible and disgusting film” made by who knows, and the conspiracists were claiming made by “Zionists”.

 

Thus Antisemitism follows in the slime laid down by this President Obama.

 

The very best exposure of these lies came yesterday in www.breitbart.com

 

This exposure concerns an e-mail that was sent by the STATE DEPARTMENT 2 hours after the attack on the Benghazi began and which Obama would have been reading immediately then.

 

I repeat Obama knew 2 hours in that the attack was coming from Al Qaida, that there was no protest at all against the film outside the American Embassy. There was instead of a protest against a film an attack by extreme Muslim fanatics against America.

 

So it is very important and instructive for us all to understand then what the President of America did. We are coming to that…

 

(THE BREITBART ANALYSIS FOLLOWS)

23 Oct 2012

Just over two hours after the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi began on Sep. 11, the White House Situation Room was notified that a militant group with connections to al Qaeda had claimed responsibility, undermining claims by the Obama administration and the media that a video was initially the suspected cause.

The new revelations come in the form of an email sent by the State Department Operations Center to the White House, the Pentagon, the FBI and unspecified elements of the intelligence community. The email was sent at 6:07 p.m. EDT, which was 12:07 a.m. Benghazi time. The attack in Benghazi had started just over two hours earlier, at 3:50 p.m. Washington time.

Reuters reports that the email message was headlined “Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack.” It read, in part: “Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli.” One of the recipients listed on the email was the White House Situation Room.

A document produced by the State Department’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security on Sep. 12th, based on public media reports, mentions Ansar al-Sharia but says, “There has been no substantiated claim of responsibility for the attacks, though media reports suggest members of Ansar al-Sharia participated in the attack.” The document goes on to say that Ansar al-Sharia has an affiliation with al Qaeda.

The administration’s inability to substantiate the claim of responsibility might explain its reluctance to call the attack “terrorism” in the early days. It does not explain why the White House sent surrogates Jay Carney and UN Ambassdor Susan Rice out repeatedly to insist the attack was a spontaneous reaction to a YouTube video. 

On September 14th alone, White House Press secretary mentioned the video more than a dozen times. He was pointedly asked three times if he meant to connect the video to the Benghazi attack and said (the third time): “We have no evidence at this time to suggest otherwise, that there was a pre-planned or ulterior instigation behind that unrest.”

But the White House did have information, almost immediately, to suggest a militia aligned with al Qaeda might be responsible for the attack. The question is why that possibility was not raised at all while the other possibility, outrage over a video, was raised dozens of times that first week. 

Is it only a coincidence that the White House’s favored explanation is by far the less politically explosive of the two?

(END OF QUOTE)

So what the writer on www.breitbart.com (John Sexton) HAMMERS HOME is that Obama lied, lied and lied again for weeks after the murder of Stephens.

Days later the bodies of Stephens and his associates came back to America and Obama and his wife met the caskets. They wore their solemn but lying faces because the lie machine was even then in full operation.

That is the level of the hypocrisy of that particular “hope for the poor oppressed black people”v president. As he met the casket of Stephens Obama did not even offer Stephens the dignity of having the truth told about how he died. Now that is low. (1)

The key paragraph in the above is the reportage on what happened in the Press Office of the White House on the 14th, that is just 3 days after the murders.

I repeat it here:

On September 14th alone, White House Press secretary mentioned the video more than a dozen times. He was pointedly asked three times if he meant to connect the video to the Benghazi attack and said (the third time): “We have no evidence at this time to suggest otherwise, that there was a pre-planned or ulterior instigation behind that unrest.”

The American Media as a whole cover for Obama. But the actual questioning of the Press Secretary is thorough, because America is deeply ivolved with The First Amendment.

The reporters at that Press Conference fairly tied down the liar who is Obama’s voice:

“No evidence to suggest”

They had the evidence in the White House in the form of the email within a couple of hours. The White House of Obama then went into a trailer load of lying garbage which had its lowest point in the staged Crowley/Obama theatre against Romney in debate Number 2, where Obama in avoiding Romney’s query had Obama saying to Crowley “let’s see the transcript, and Crowley had it under her desk!!!”

Now that is a Chicago set-up.

The city of Al Capone. The city of Obama.

The latest coming to light shows that the CBS had Obama admitting on the day after that there was Al qaida involved in the killing of Stephens. But they edited that out.

The very latest from www.debka.com is raising the reality that Stephens in Benghazi was not so much running an Embassy as running a depot for the supply of arms to the rebels in Syria. And if Stephens was doing that then he was not doing it off his own bat, he was only representing the Obama regime.

(1) The comments to the article from www.breitbart.com are vital. They show that the ordinary American is racing way ahead of the Media, but the only thing holding up this carcass in the White House IS the Media. Just as the Media hold up Abbas and hide the reality of Hamas, and just as the Media say nothing about Pollard, or also on a different theme that Julian Assange is kept a prisoner in a small room in London. This one is only one and not even the best

“Well stated. Even this article isn’t up front. FACT= There was a drone and they watched it in real time and that piece of s**t denied the help and went to bed!  Petreus knew. Why? I want an answer why we left our men to die. Maybe he would talk about the guns  you left there to be used against our people. He goes to bed…We are staring in the face of EVIL!!!!!!”……………Also there were suggestions that Obama turned off the truth because he went to Vegas where he had big money gathering operations for his campaign, not so far-fetched when you think that for Obama everything depends (can an EX president be impeached?) on re-election organization, in Ohio his team have THREE times as many offices opened as Romney, yet the lie is that Romney is the millionaire. Nobody has yet come to terms with this mass psychosis over Obama, which has similarities to the psychosis over the “Palestinians”, or Princess Di, or over Srebrenica which is a Lie. It has Hitlerian overtones.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s