THE RE-ELECTION OF OBAMA AND WHAT IT MEANS FOR THE FUTURE

Nidra Poller on American Thinker…Extract:

 

It seems that the economic factor was, as expected, decisive for the vast majority of voters. And that’s why they chose Obama over Romney? When European voters dissatisfied with the state of their economies systematically reject incumbents, Americans, of all people, reward economic failure?

Foreign policy, on the other hand, apparently weighed less than zero in determining the choice of voters. Logical, isn’t it? Iran races to go nuclear, the Arab-Muslim world is in a paroxysm of rage and destruction, Israel’s existence is under dire threat, European societies tremble as their providential economies run out of gas and their demographics link up with the enraged sharia-imposing forces massed on the borders of the free world, so why should foreign policy be an issue?

 

USING THE MEDIA AND FIGURES LIKE MADONNA AND JOLIE OBAMA WILL RULE WITHOUT CONGRESS (BONAPARTISM)

 

Now the inquest starts.

 

The issue in America is not whether it is republican or democrat, the issue is the world economic crisis in the capitalist system (a period of severe world-wide contraction following the post 45 boom) but that neither parties have an answer to this crisis of the capitalist system.

 

Obama is the most dangerous. We saw his role in that he went to war against Muammar Gadhafi by completely sidestepping Congress, which is AGAINST THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION.

 

On the very night of his election Obama was already proceeding to rule with the same strategy, side-stepping Congress. The whole line of the Media and especially the BBC was why are these horrible Republicans of Congress such horrible people and such unreasonable horrible people.

 

Obama with nothing to lose in his last 4 years is going to rule in this way. It is called Bonapartism and if people do not know what that means they should find out because it is the ante-chamber to Fascism.

 

Note well. It is not Fascism. It is the preceding period.

 

In short the choice is Fascism or Socialism, Fascist Revolution or Socialist Revolution.

 

The American situation is so different to the European because the American Revolution still lives in the principles of the Republican Party.

 

But Romney did not articulate that nor could he.

 

The American Republican elite have sold out on the principles of the Great American Constitution which flow from out of the Great American (Bourgeois) revolution. It was very clear that they had sold out when Michelle Bachmann was isolated by this Republican Elite during the campaign because she opposed the support for Hamas in America.

 

Romney and the Elite not once referred to Obama going to war on Muammar Gadhafi thus side-stepping the Constitution, which states clearly that a President of America must get consent of Congress. Stephens in Benghazi was transferring guns to the Muslim Brotherhood fighting Assad…Note no Congress again! Romney dropped that in Debate 3 following the intervention of Crowley in Debate 2.

 

This was a step on from Clinton in Yugoslavia. There Clinton created the false red flag operations of Racak and Srebrenica, to frame the Serbs, to create the alliance with the Jihad (Izetbegovic), and to rush Congress behind the war on the Serbs (6 months bombing of Serbia)

 

But Obama moves again. Obama had moved from Clintobn. No red flag needed. He just dismisses Congress, dismisses the Constitution.

 

Obama rules without Congress. In a real way Obama rules with Madonna, Pitt and Jolie.

 

Obama is above the Constitution. He parades his gawky wife and his gawky children and makes his personal life the issue. The feminist traitors to Feminism lap it up.

 

But Obama is not Hitler. The role of Obama is to open the door to a Hitler American leader.

 

It will emerge out of the economic crisis. There will be many forces at play. There will certainly be what is not the left, that is those like www.wsws.org who support Obama the Islamist, and who create Antisemitism in everything they do.

 

And the future Fascism will have as a central component Antisemitism and Anticommunism, because the role of Fascism is to end all opposition, and to make the capitalist crisis survivable for capital. The Republican Party is filled with Anticommunism so Fascism in America will come from there too I am sorry to have to say.

 

The situation is far more complicated and even more serious than Daniel Greenfieldpresents it.

 

the analysis which follows by Greenfield is typically shallow. Greenfield like so many of these reject Leon Trotsky and his method of analysis of capitalism. Greenfield ignores the historical crisis in capitalism. Greenfield does not understand the meaning of the phenomenon of Bonapartism and he is utterly opposed to the Trotskyist analysis of Fascism, just as Jabotinsky also was.

 

In that way Greenfield, and people like Belman on Israpundit whom we mentioned yesterday, actually disarm the Jews, and disarm Israel, in the face of Fascism in the United States. That after all is the essence of the alliance of Obama with the Muslim Brotherhood.

 

(ANALYSIS FOLLOWS)

 

Daniel Greenfield, FPM

In this election the Republican Party ran two wholly inoffensive blue state Republicans on a platform of jobs at a time when the economy was everyone’s chief concern and the incumbent had absolutely failed to fix the economy. And they lost.

The Monday — or Wednesday — morning quarterbacks will have a fine time debating what Mitt Romney should have done differently. The red Republicans will say that he should have been more aggressive and should have hit Obama on Benghazi. The blue Republicans will blame a lack of outreach to Latinos. Some will blame Sandy, others will blame Christie and many will point to voter fraud. And they will all have a point, but the makings of this defeat did not happen in the last two weeks; they happened in the last two years.

Mitt Romney won the primaries because he was electable. But, as it turned out, he really wasn’t electable after all. Not when the chief criteria of electability is having no opinion, no point of view and no reason to run for office except to win. Not when the chief criteria of being a Republican presidential nominee is being able to convince people that you’re hardly a Republican at all.

Romney was a star political athlete who had an excellent training regimen and coaching staff. But to win elections, you have to change people’s minds. It’s not enough to try hard or to fight hard; you have to fight for something besides the chance to round the bases. You have to wake people up to a cause.

The Republican comeback did not begin with innocuous candidates; it began with angry protesters in costumes and Gadsden flags marching outside ObamaCare town halls. The 2010 midterm election triumphs were not the work of a timorous establishment, but of a vigorous grassroots opposition. And once the Tea Party movement started the fire, the Republican establishment acted like the Tea Party had sabotaged their comeback and cut the ties with their own grassroots movement. Separated, the Republican grassroots and the Republican Party both withered on the vine.

The stunning 2010 midterm election victories happened because a conservative opposition loudly and vociferously convinced a majority of Americans that ObamaCare would be harmful to them. And then that fantastic engine of change was packed away and replaced with political consultants who were all focused on seizing the center and offending as few people as possible. But you don’t win political battles by being inoffensive. And you don’t win elections by avoiding conflict.

Is it any wonder that the 2012 election played out the way it did?

The Democrats in the Bush years were about as unlikable a party as could ever be conceived of. They were hostile, hateful and obstructionist. They spewed conspiracy theories at the drop of a hat and behaved in a way that would have convinced any reasonable person not to entrust them with a lawnmower, let alone political power. And not only were they rewarded for that by winning Congress, but they also went on to win the White House.

Why? Because dissatisfied people gravitate to an opposition. They don’t gravitate to a loyal opposition. They aren’t inspired by mild-mannered rhetoric, but by those who appear to channel their anger.

When the Republican Party sold out the Tea Party, it sold out its soul, and the only driving energy that it had. And there was nothing to replace it with. The Republican Party stopped being the opposition and became a position that it was willing to reposition to get closer to the center. Mitt Romney embodied that willingness to say anything to win and it is exactly that willingness to say anything to win that the public distrusts.

The elevation of Mitt Romney was the triumph of inoffensiveness. Romney ran an aggressive campaign, but it was a mechanical exercise, a smooth assault by trained professionals paid to spin talking points in dangerous directions. But, what if the voters really wanted a certain amount of offensiveness?

What if they wanted someone who mirrored their anger at being out of work, at having to look at stacks of unpaid bills and at not knowing where their next paycheck was coming from? What if they wanted someone whose anger and distrust of the government echoed their own?

Romney very successfully made the case that he would be a more credible steward of the economy. It was enough to turn out a sizable portion of the electorate, but not enough of it. He tried to be Reagan confronting Carter, but what was remarkable about Reagan, is that he had moments of anger and passion; electric flashes of feeling that stirred his audience and made them believe that he understood their frustrations. That was the source of Reagan’s moral authority and it was entirely lacking in Romney. And without that anger, there is no compelling reason to vote for an opposition party.

The establishment had its chance with Mitt Romney. The former Massachusetts governor was everything that they could possibly want. Moderate, bipartisan and fairly liberal. With his business background, he could make a perfect case for being able to turn the economy around. They had their perfect candidate and their perfect storm and they blew it.

The Republican Party is not going to win elections by being inoffensive. It is not going to win elections by going so far to the center that it no longer stands for anything. It is not going to win elections by throwing away all the reasons that people might have to vote for it. It is not going to win elections by constantly trying to accommodate what it thinks independent voters want, instead of cultivating and growing its base, and using them as the nucleus for an opposition that will change the minds of those independent voters.

The Republican Party has tried playing Mr. Nice Guy. It may be time to get back to being an opposition movement. And the way to do that is by relearning the lessons of the Tea Party movement. The Democratic Party began winning when it embraced the left, instead of running away from it. If the Republican Party wants to win, then it has to embrace the right and learn to get angry again.

BREITBART AND GELLER WERE NOT ABLE TO DEFEAT OBAMA…THAT IS THE MAIN LESSON OF US ELECTION

Of course it is not Romney who has lost. Romney will retire to a comfortable retirement in a gated community and will be untouched by the Fascism which will follow with the destruction of the rights contained in the American Constitution which Obama and called the left but NOT the left are preparing to throw away. Expect sites like Jihadwatch and that of Pamela Geller to be closed. It is the American Constitution, the Great American Constitution, the result of the Great American Revolution that is being thrown under the bus by an American capitalist class, really represented by the becoming Fascist Obama. Obama is not Hitler, but make no doubt about it, Obama opens the door to Fascism. I expect sites like Breitbart to move into a really dangerous, protofascist direction now. I do not think that Breitbart and those like it will really fight Obama, what they will fight is communism in America, and they will be disguising this by calling it the left. As they use it and have been using it this term “the left” is referring to groups of fascists who are in support of Islam and are in support of the Antisemitism of “Palestinianism”, or the so-called “Palestinians”.

 

That is the big issue that has to be fought for by 4international. The big lessons of Yugoslavia and the murder of Milosevic are still there. Take Israpundit and its leader Ted Belman who mistakingly calls himself a “Zionist”. Belman too late caught on about the Serbs and too late defended the Serbs. But then on the Arab Spring Belman supported it by supporting “Sand Monkey” (as did Pamela Geller) against Mubarak. On Libya Ted Belman actual;ly called for NATO to bomb Gadhafi. It was as if Milosevic had not happened for Belman. Learn nothning forget nothing. And this runs right through all of these groups.

 

We called to defend Romney against the Media set-up and to defend the First Amendment. But Romney was not a fighter for freedom and was refusing to take on the Media over the lies of Obama. You have to draw the sharpest conclusions about Romney and all the rest of these Republican Leaders. You cannot fight Fascism in the way the Republican Party with leaders like Romney in this election tried. Basically they did not understand how to tell the truth to the people.

 

There were 2 key moments. 1. A then candidate (newt Gingrich) stated that the “Palestinians” were a fraud. Correct. But not followed up. 2. Debate 2 Romney raised issue of murder of Stephens in Benghazi and was moving towards role of Obama in Libya. The Moderater Crowley intervened. Debate was ending. But Debate 3 Romney did not return. Romney was a coward or was got at.

 

Netanyahu will pay for this. Israel will pay for this. But again it is the Jews of Israel who will really pay for the weaknesses of Netanyahu. Netanyahu is made of exactly the same kind of useless stuff as is Belman of Israpundit and is Romney. On 4international we must not allow the Jews to have to pay again.

 

The starting point in all of this is to understand why people on sites such as Israpundit, people like Yamit82, who takes his name from the expulsion of Jews from Sinai by Begin, why they were so hostile to 4international, along with Belman. It is not as if 4international was opposing Israel. We were foremost in defending Israel.I was even called an Antisemite by a man called Dervolin on Belman’s Israpundit. What were they doing, these so-called Zionists on Israpundit. What they were doing was opposing communism, they were red-baiters, they were hostile to Trotskyism above all else, first and foremost. That is what the whole Breitbart opposition to Obama was all about. That is also what Breitbart and Belman’s Israpundit will turn into, they will become communist haters. And they will just delight in calling fascists like the SWP the left. We on 4international must explode this Big Lie.

 

There is no chance that Obama will raise a finger against fellow Muslims and Islamists in Iran. They will go on to develop the Nuclear Bomb which they will use without any doubt to murder millions of Israeli Jews Obama, the Democrats, Europe and the SWP types will laugh at this. The BBC will just love reporting on the death of millions of Jews and the ending of Israel. The American trade union leaders who supported this proto fascist Obama will see the working class of America decimated due to mass unemployment caused by economic collapse. The trade unions will eventually be closed down as an American Fascism takes wing. Already the steps towards this are being taken as groups such as Jihadwatch are labelled as hate groups. Soon they will be closed down. Later all organizations of resistance will be closed. Like Bush Romney will retire somewhere nice and cosy. But because he did not know how to fighnt Fascism there will be a sharp move to Fascism. Fascism is essentially closing down all forms of opposition to the demands of capital. The groups like Israpundit and Breitbart will be part of this because a big part of Fascism in America is and will be opposition to Communism. Which for the likes of Belman, Geller, Pollock and so on, they do not recognise the differences between Stalinism and Trotskyism, between Stalin and Trotsky. They know nothing.

 

And so 4international must go on. The capitalist crisis will more and more determine all politics. We are alone in the world. We do know that Leon Trotsky became the greatest of all fighters for the Jews, especially in the 1930s as the Nazis threatened the Jews. THAT is what Geller, Belman, and Breitbart dislike and attack. Leon Trotsky had become the greatest fighter against Stalinism and Nazism and had become a Zionist, but a new kind of Zionist, a Zionist who was revolutionary socialist and was also based on atheism, or dialectical materialism. THAT is what they cannot stomach. So they refer to the likes of the SWP as the left when if they were telling the truth they would call them Antisemiktes or whatever, BUT NOT SOCIALISTS, no more than Stalin was a socialist revolutionary. Youth must learn about history and they must learn about Leon Trotsky and if they do not learn that they will remain ignorant youth and later ignorant human beings.

SUPPORT ROMNEY TO DEFEAT OBAMA BECAUSE OBAMA WILL DESTROY THE GREAT AMERICAN CONSTITUTION

THE ISSUE IN THE AMERICAN ELECTION IS THAT WITHOUT THE FIRST AMENDMENT WORKERS AND SOCIALISTS AS WELL AS PROGRESSIVE NATIONALISTS SIMPLY CANNOT FIGHT. THE EVENTS OVER THE MURDER OF AMBASSADOR STEPHENS SHOWS THAT OBAMA LIES LIES LIES. PLUS HE WENT TO WAR IN LIBYA WITHOUT CONGRESS…

 

ROBERT SPENCER OF JIHADWATCH BRILLIANTLY SUMS UP MANY OF THE ISSUES:

 

“

SPENCER ASKS…Are you safer from the global jihad and Islamic supremacism than you were four years ago? Over the last four years, Barack Obama has:

 

HE ANSWERS IN 8 BRILLIANT POINTS:

 

that heralded the installation of pro-Sharia Islamic supremacist regimes in each. These regimes are already oppressing women and non-Muslims and striving to outdo their predecessors in anti-Americanism. The Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt, meanwhile, is giving out strong and repeated hints that the Camp David Accords, and Egypt’s uneasy but 30-year-old peace with Israel, are not long for this world.

• Refused to say a single positive word about the uprising against the bloody Islamic regime in Iran, ostensibly on the grounds that American support would doom the uprising to failure – a possibility that never gave him pause in his rush to praise the Egyptian, Libyan, and Tunisian uprisings. He thus missed an opportunity to weaken and destabilize, at the very least, a rogue regime that is relentlessly pursuing development of nuclear weapons and has made no secret of its genocidal intentions toward Israel.
• Displayed repeated contempt for Israel and its prime minister, thereby drastically weakening the U.S.’s relationship with its only ally in the Middle East and encouraging jihadists who have vowed to destroy the Jewish state – not least in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
• Readily acquiesced to the demands of Muslim groups tied to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood that training material for the FBI and Department of Homeland Security be purged of all accurate information about how jihadists use the texts and teachings of Islam to recruit and motivate terrorists. This has led to a government-wide willful ignorance about the motives and goals of those who have vowed to destroy us, which in turn leads to disastrous policy mistakes based on false assumptions about the outlook and aspirations of Muslim “insurgents.” The most obvious recent consequence of this analytical failure was the murder of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans at the Benghazi consulate by revolutionaries Obama and Stevens had backed on the assumption that they were benign democratic pluralists.

• Kept American troops in Afghanistan without a clearly defined mission, fighting against a foe, the Taliban, that have so thoroughly infiltrated the government and police force that our troops are murdered by their putative allies in ever-increasing numbers. Our ostensible allies have responded to this infiltration by inviting Taliban members to run for offices in the upcoming elections, making it more unclear than ever what is the purpose of the continuing American presence there, except perhaps to demonstrate that Barack Obama is not weak on defense or soft on jihad terror.
• Aided and abetted the ever more prevalent idea that when Muslims riot and murder over something a non-Muslim has said or done, the fault, and the responsibility to change his behavior, lies with the non-Muslim. He has done this by blaming the Muhammad video for the Benghazi consulate attack for a considerable period after he knew that it was a jihad attack that had been planned for some time beforehand and had nothing to do with the video. By proclaiming that “the future does not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam,” he has thrown in his lot with those who are demanding curbs on the First Amendment to criminalize the criticism of Islam.
• Lent the prestige and power of his Justice Department to court cases involving Muslims demanding special accommodation not accorded to non-Muslims. One notorious example was the case of Safoorah Khan, the first-year teacher that Obama’s DOJ forced the Chicago-area Berkeley School District to pay $75,000 in back pay, damages, and attorney fees. The district’s crime was refusing Khan’s request for three weeks off during the school year so she could make the hajj, the pilgrimage to Mecca, and dismissing her when she went anyway. Such cases are increasing in number nationwide, with the Obama Justice Department’s active involvement.
• Utterly failed, despite his many attempts to accommodate Muslims domestically and internationally, to stop jihadists from plotting attacks on U.S. soil. In recent years there was Rezwan Ferdaus, who was just sentenced last week to seventeen years in prison for his jihad plot to blow up the Pentagon and the Capitol building; Amine Mohamed El-Khalifi, a would-be jihad/martyrdom suicide bomber who also targeted the Capitol; Naser Abdo, the would-be second Fort Hood jihad mass murderer; Khalid Aldawsari, the would-be jihad mass murderer in Lubbock, Texas; Muhammad Hussain, the would-be jihad bomber in Baltimore; Mohamed Mohamud, the would-be jihad bomber in Portland; Faisal Shahzad, the would-be Times Square jihad mass-murderer; Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, the Arkansas military recruiting station jihad murderer; Ahmed Ferhani and Mohamed Mamdouh, who hatched a jihad plot to blow up a Manhattan synagogue; Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the would-be Christmas airplane jihad bomber; and many others like them who have plotted and/or committed mass murder in the name of Islam. The days when liberal pundits confidently predicted that all this would end with the election of Barack Obama seem very long ago indeed.

 

http://pjmedia.com/blog/8-reasons-you-arent-safer-than-4-years-ago/?singlepage=true

 

THE SHAMEFUL HARRY’S PLACE SUPPORTS THE STATE REPRESSION OF THE EDL AND ATTACKS PAMELA GELLER

The British website Harry’s Place has come down on the side of the British state and police in their persectution of Tommy Robinson of the English Defence League.

Basically Harry’s Place is supporting the police arresting over 50 members of the EDL not at a demo but before (as they intended to attend) a demo.

 

This is very like what the British State did to the Miners as they planned to attend meetings and pickets. They arrested and stopped miners from travelling on the public roads of Britain

 

The horror show which is Harry’s Place lines up with all of that.

 

i reject this term of the “left” to descrine these police snitches in the so-called “United Against Fascism” and others and this sentiment of my rejection of this term, which is very misleading, is contained in this comment which I placed this morning on Harry’s Place:

 

Will Defens

You really must give more attention to your use of words to describe this new phenomenon. These people such as United Against Fascism are NOT the left.

You write:

“The lefts response to Islam is, a few blogs that the main stream press and Guardian types totally ignore. At the same time Islam is gaining a very powerful political base in this country. The people running Tower Hamlets are linked to the IFE. Nothing, not a peep from the left. In fact the left are actually in cahoots with them.. The left is actually helping racists and genocidal manics to oppress their won people.”

You are very wrong there in calling these “the left”. They are not in any way left, and are not standing in the traditions of the great socialist thinkers and practitioners. NO WAY!

But I have no ready answer as to what to call them. So I appreciate your difficulty.

The first thing to appreciate is that there is actually no left in existence, none at all.

These whom you call “the left” are as you point out in alliance with Islam which is a most reactionary ideology, and they are now also in league with the capitalist state, and with the police, no doubt therefore behind the scenes with the Special Branch.

They are certainly agents of the state machine which itself is in league with Islam for reasons which have not yet been consciously identified.

There is one obvious link to the arrest by the state aided by these folk whom you call the left, and that is the arrest of the miners at the edges of the British motorway system, on their way to rallies or pickets during the decisive Miners Strike.

Here just as in the Miners Strike the state is moving to attacking the INTENTION to demonstrate etc.

I would say that many of these in the UAF etc. are paid by the state (given the loose and undisciplined nature of these groups the infiltration must be enormous).. Also as Britain slips into crisis even more these precedents of arrest before an event will be used against all kinds of workers’ organizations.

I am at a loss to know what to call these people. I used to call them “left Fascists” but I am now rejecting this term. The left part is misleading.

The best I can come up with is “Pro-state provocateurs”

http://hurryupharry.org/2012/11/02/pamela-geller-and-robert-spencer-raise-funds-for-edl-leader%e2%80%99s-legal-defence/#comment-820029

 

FOR THE RECORD I DEFEND UNCONDITIONALLY THE ENGLISH DEFENCE LEAGUE AS THEY ARE REPRESSED BY THE BRITISH STATE MACHINE, AND I ALSO DEFEND UNCONDITIONALLY PAMELA GELLER AND ROBERT SPENCER. THAT IS THE CORRECT POSITION FOR A PRINCIPLED LEFT TO TAKE.

OBAMA MUST BE DEFEATED BECAUSE HE AND THE MEDIA ARE VERY CLOSE TO FASCISM IN THEIR HATRED OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION

I THINK IT DOES MATTER. I WANT ROMNEY TO DEFEAT OBAMA BECAUSE I BELIEVE THAT OBAMA IS MUCH CLOSER TO BRINGING IN FASCISM IN AMERICA. IT IS BECAUSE OBAMA WITH THE BACKING OF THE CORRUPT MEDIA AS SEEN IN THE MURDER OF STEPHENS IS MUCH MUCH CLOSER TO FASCISM

 

WITH OBAMA DEFEATED THAT WILL BE A SET-BACK TO THE MOST REACTIONARY FORCES IN THE AMERICAN MEDIA

 

WITH ROMNEY ELECTED WE WOULD CONTINUE THE STRUGGLE BECAUSE IT IS AN INTERNATIONAL CAPITALIST CRISIS AND THERE IS NO WAY OUT THROUGH CAPITALISM AS IT MOVES TO FASCIST FORMS OF RULE. NUT ROMNEY IS ONVIOUSLY MORE LOYAL TO THE GREAT AMERICAN CONSTITUTION WHICH MUST BE DEFENDED

 

I PLACED THE FOLLOWING AS A COMMENT TO AN ARTICLE ON ISRAPUNDIT

 

“In the past the US backed the monarchs or dictators whether they were Islamists of socialist. Now there is a sense that US should shift to backing the MB because fascist governments are more stable than democracies, especially fledgling democracies”.

http://www.israpundit.com/archives/50373/comment-page-1#comment-223012
Nasser for example was not a “socialist” no more than was Hitler. All of these and more often used and use socialist sounding words and programmes because they are playing to their own popularity among the poor masses whom they wish to attract to their banner, whether Fascist like Hitler or Bonapartist like Mubarak etc.

That is if truth and programme mean anything.
Would you call Finkelstein a Zionist or a Jew? I do not think he is in reality.

The basic problem with FGW and with the whole of the Zionist movement as we at present understand it is that he thinks it is a revolutionary doctrine, but it is not, it is a conservative doctrine. In the time of slavery it was for slavery, in the time of feudalism for feudalism and in the time of capitalism for capitalism.

But capitalism in crisis brings on Fascism.

Israel is not a way out if you accept capitalism because Fascism is like Capitalism International.

It is only if Jews become revolutionary socialists that they can defend their Jewish Homeland. The Jews need revolutionary socialism and the socialist revolution. But the conservatism of Judaism will keep them tied to capitalism, and because of that tied to the United States as present constituted.

Obama is not a socialist, but rather he is much closer in every way to the stage of capitalism known as Fascism.

This takes the form of his disregard and hatred for the Great American Constitution. America is very close to Fascism as is seen in the cover-up of the Media of the events surrounding the murder of Stephens in Benghazi. And never forget Obama went to war in Libya without Congress.

That is why tactically speaking it is vital that Obama be defeated by Romney. With Romney in power we will have to deal with him, remmebering that the Republican Party isolated Michelle Bachmann when she and 4 others spoke against Islam in America.

But if Obama wins that is a defeat.

Just as when Obama/Morsi winning against Mubarak that also was a defeat.

You have to take sides…you cannot opt out. If Assad is defeated in Syria that too will be a defeat. it is another big betrayal to mess around on this issue. You either defend Assad or you support Obama/Sharia law in Syria