INTRODUCTION TO ARTICLE
WWW.4INTERNATIONAL.ME has always stood behind Israel and we have always said that the main intention of the Arabs was to destroy Israel. That is what the Antisemitic Leftists have been supporting, the destruction of Israel.
This article deals with how weak is the present Israeli Jewish leaders, not one leader, but them all…
The article points to the need for a qualitative different leadership.
START ARTICLE HERE
Myth and Fact: Arafat and Camp David
Mitchell G. Bard
“Yasser Arafat rejected Ehud Barak’s proposals at Camp David and the White House in 2000 because they did not offer the Palestinians a viable state. Palestine would have been denied water, control of its holy places, and would have been divided into cantons surrounded by Israelis. Israel would have also retained control of Jerusalem and denied refugees the right to return.”
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered to withdraw from 97 percent of the West Bank and 100 percent of the Gaza Strip. In addition, he agreed to dismantle 63 isolated settlements. In exchange for the 5 percent annexation of the West Bank, Israel would increase the size of the Gaza territory by roughly a third.
Barak also made previously unthinkable concessions on Jerusalem, agreeing that Arab neighbourhoods of East Jerusalem would become the capital of the new state. The Palestinians would maintain control over their holy places and have “religious sovereignty” over the Temple Mount.
Mitchell G. Bard states above what is true. These are facts and are definitely verifiable.
Their importance is that they show the Israeli leadership on their knees begging Arafat and the “Palestinians” for a deal, and this Jewish leadership were prepared to instal them in a state, making huge concessions on security. It would have meant the withdrawal of all Jews from Gaza, the extension of Gaza, having a Palestinian Arab state within spitting distance of ben Gurion airport, and other such nonsence. And it shows the Arabs spurning Israel, for what, really for a one state in which the Arabs would have the majority, which is the same formula which the Muslim Brotherhood has fought for in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and now Syria.
So there are two sides. One is the very faulty leadership on the Jewish siode. The other is the real intentions of the Arab Palestinians, who are always following the programme of genocide of the Jews, as laid down in the Hamas Charter, which is why it remains in place.
Here the link is created with the present, especially the present in Syria, where the same pattern as in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya is operational.
In all of these the West, including the BBC, is engaged on the side of these genocidal Arabs of the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaida.
The BBC anchor man this morning was calling the Mali Jihadists as “fighters” while their reporter on the spot kept calling them Islamists.
The so-called left as we know it today has surrendered to this.