FELIX QUIGLEY SAYS…THIS IS THE RESULT OF A DEEP SICKNESS IN THE ZIONIST CAIUSE. Are these generals in charge of the IDF youth not in control in any way? The debka report says that these soldiers were using most likely modern smartphones and it is a piece of cake for the enemy to listen in and also to use them to pinpoint their strikes. But all the time this dhimmi Netanyahu is playing up to these Antisemites in Spain and Ireland whose tropos are over there and in the pocket of Hizbullah. These IDF generals must be cleared out. But Netanyahu first!
Israel military scours Kfar Ghajar border village for Hizballah spies on a school rooftopDEBKAfile Exclusive Report January 29, 2015, 9:22 PM (IDT)IDF casualties of Hizballah attack are evacuated
The divided Alawite village of Kafr Ghajar, which stands athwart the Israeli-Syrian-Lebanese border triangle, was exhaustively searched by Israeli special forces Thursday, Jan 29, debkafile’s exclusive military sources report. The searchers were looking for evidence of spotters suspected of transmitting to Hizballah at its Mt. Dov (Shabaa Farms) outpost the day before, a description of the IDF command convoy vehicles to be targeted. Hizballah was therefore able to identity the convoy and attack it, killing two Israeli soldiers and injuring seven.
The IDF searchers by land and air focused on the roofs of village schools. From there, it is now believed, surveillance devices and spotters were perched and regularly passed information to the Hizballah position just four km to the northeast.
That is how the Hizballah attackers are assumed to have singled out the IDF command convoy of civilian pickup trucks from the traffic that normally uses the road running below their Mt. Dov outpost.
The deviation from course of one of the six Kornet anti-tank rockets Hizballah launched against the convoy aroused suspicion. The deviant rocket struck a Kafr Ghajar school building which went up in flames. There is no chance that the rocket went astray because the Kornet system is laser-guided.
IDF military analysts suggest that Hizballah bombed the school to divert attention from the presence of its collaborators in the village and the spies it had posted on the school roof.
The rubble of the burnt school is being carefully sifted through for the surveillance equipment which the rocket aimed to destroy.
Investigators find Hizballah’s use of rooftop spies in Kfar Ghajar as the only explanation for its precision in targeting two ordinary white pickups on an Israeli road from a distance of 5 km, which is at the far end of the Kornet’s effective range.
The IDF is also probing the use made by the servicemen in the convoy of civilian cell phone networks, which are known to be wide open to Iranian and Russian eavesdropping from across the border in Syria and Lebanon.
The servicemen are also being questioned about the use they made of the safe, ciphered military “Mountain Rose” communications network during their trip in the targeted convoy, and whether they used any of the popular mobile phones, on which Hizballah actively snoops.
After the recent speech al-Sisi made calling for a reevaluation of the aspects of Islamic thinking that are “antagonizing the entire world,” the State Department should be working closely with him on strategies for teaching against jihad violence and Islamic supremacism in Muslim countries. Instead, it is meeting with his opposition, which is dedicated in its own words, according to a captured internal document, to “eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within, and sabotaging its miserable house.”
“Muslim Brotherhood-Aligned Leaders Hosted at State Department,” by Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon, January 28, 2015:
The State Department hosted a delegation of Muslim Brotherhood-aligned leaders this week for a meeting about their ongoing efforts to oppose the current government of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi of Egypt, who rose to power following the overthrow of Mohamed Morsi, an ally of the Brotherhood, in 2013.
One member of the delegation, a Brotherhood-aligned judge in Egypt, posed for a picture while at Foggy Bottom in which he held up the Islamic group’s notorious four-finger Rabia symbol, according to his Facebook page.
That delegation member, Waleed Sharaby, is a secretary-general of the Egyptian Revolutionary Council and a spokesman for Judges for Egypt, a group reported to have close ties to the Brotherhood.
Sharaby, the Brotherhood-aligned judge, flashed the Islamist group’s popular symbol in his picture at the State Department and wrote in a caption: “Now in the U.S. State Department. Your steadfastness impresses everyone,” according to an independent translation of the Arabic.
Another member of the delegation, Maha Azzam, confirmed during an event hosted Tuesday by the Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy (CSID)—another group accused of having close ties to the Brotherhood—that the delegation had “fruitful” talks with the State Department.
Assam also said that the department expressed openness to engagement, according to one person who attended the event.
Trager, a fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), told the Washington Free Beacon that the State Department is interested in maintaining a dialogue with the Brotherhood due to its continued role in the Egyptian political scene.
“The State Department continues to speak with Muslim Brothers on the assumption that Egyptian politics are unpredictable, and the Brotherhood still has some support in Egypt,” he said. “But when pro-Brotherhood delegations then post photos of themselves making pro-Brotherhood gestures in front of the State Department logo, it creates an embarrassment for the State Department.”…
I am writing this and posting it to Richie Allen from Waterford, and ask him to show it to his boss David Icke chief of all conspiracy theorists and main defender of Islam in the whole world. Also Allen could pass this on to the Marbella Martin Nathan who employs him on his radio station Talk Radio Europe. How about it Allen. Talk about this Allen.
We are both from the same country Ireland but our approach to a young man being dragged screaming onto a square where he is held down and his head is chopped off as he squeals I will not forgive you and I am not responsable for what you say. His great crime …he is insulting Islam they read out.
Meanwhile on another section of Talk Radio Europe a woman called Pippa Jones has had Cage Prisoners on her show and often. the Cage Prisoners had a direct line to a terrorist Islamic mastermind who the Americans eventually managed to assasinate, and the same terrorist mastermind had a say in the assasins in Paris. These are all things for Martin Nathan and his big time producer a guy called Bill Padley to consider very carefully, and to reckon on what exactly they are doing in journalism. I throw down the gauntlet to these people.
Nobody is getting to terms with what is this Islamic State. The traditional socialists thought for a long time they could just talk about capitalism and Jobs. But the disintegration of capitalism is taking new forms. This IS the disintegration of the capitalist system. The system of nation states was ripped apart by US presidents and European leaders, for example the war on Gadhafi which led to the present non state and anarchy in Libya. The same in Syria.
People must read this stuff whether they like to or not because that is the reality of what they are experiencing today. It is from the excellent Jihadwatch which I support.
“A militant addressed the large crowd, which included children, as the man was restrained behind him claiming to carry out the ‘law of Allah’ by executing him for allegedly insulting God.” Not that this has anything to do with Islam. “Isis publicly behead man in Syrian town square for ‘insulting Allah’ as he screams for help,” by Lizzie Dearden, the Independent, January 28, 2015 (thanks to Robert):
A man was held down and beheaded for “insulting Allah” in the middle of a Syrian town by Isis fighters as he screamed for help from the silent crowd.
Footage reportedly taken on Monday in the town of Al-Shadadi is the terror group’s latest show of brutality in its territories stretching from the Turkish border in Syria to northern Iraq.
Details of the man’s crime were unknown but his death was staged for maximum exposure in a public square.
A militant addressed the large crowd, which included children, as the man was restrained behind him claiming to carry out the “law of Allah” by executing him for allegedly insulting God.
Isis militants beheaded the man publicly after posing for cameras, in Al-Shadadi, Syria Isis militants beheaded the man publicly after posing for cameras, in Al-Shadadi, Syria Isis fighters posed with the man as the address was filmed close-up for the group’s propaganda makers.
Unlike most victims, the young man was not blindfolded and was forced to the ground face down to be decapitated.
He continued to struggle while screaming for help as the crowd stood watching and filming the gruesome display on their phones.
According to the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights, who said the footage appeared genuine, he shouted: “I won’t forgive you, I am not the one who did it.”
Isis militants beheaded the man publicly after posing for cameras, in Al-Shadadi, Syria Isis militants beheaded the man publicly after posing for cameras, in Al-Shadadi, Syria One militant dropped his Kalashnikov as the man fought his captors for several minutes, eventually being pinned down by four men including one sitting on his back and pinning his arms behind him.
When the executioner finally beheaded him with one blow of a sword, a roar went up from the crowd as militants chanted “Allahu akbar” (God is great).…
I think that Netanyahu is a blow hard Israeli politician but a man who does Little to defend Jews and justice in the world. To me he is an empty “Shell”. I have never forgiven Netanyahu and never will for “accepting” the Hamas rockets onto Sderot for so long, if truth be told for many years.. Netanyahu is that type of man. Although I defend him against Obama type Antisemitism I do not like anything about him as a leader. I like leaders to be above all proud and independent minded in their thinking and forgive me I have found Netanyahu to be the opposite. So in the recent attack which killed the two soldiers in Golan Netanyahu reacts by bluster against Hizbullah when the real attack should be against the United Nations in Lebanon, and either the Spanish or Irish troops who are clearly on the side of Hizbullah and Iran, and against Obama and the Spanish Governemnt on the same basis. But from Netanyahu only bluster. To me it is the same as the rockets on Sderot and Netanyahu ACCEPTS in his own internal thought machinations the sacrifice of these two Young Jewish men. of course there will be funerals and all that with Netanyahu there but to me that is the sense of it. At the funerals Netanyahu may feel genuine sorrow but there is more to living that that, there is also acting.
There is a super article on Jerusalem Posts, actually from Reuters 2013 (July) and read it please http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Analysis-By-relying-on-Iran-and-Hezbollah-Syrias-Assad-risks-irrelevance-320532
This analysis is one of the very few I have seen that mirrors the work of Daniel Pipes on this in that what alternatives did Assad have when Obama witht he huge power of the US went on the warpath?
Place into google something like “who started it in Syria?” and you will have to do some thinking on what you see. For example I read this:
“Main Issues: The Roots of the Conflict
The Syrian uprising started as a reaction to the Arab Spring, a series of anti-government protests across the Arab world inspired by the fall of the Tunisian regime in early 2011. But at the root of the conflict was anger over unemployment, decades of dictatorship, corruption and state violence under of the Middle East’s most repressive regimes.
But if you leave Syria for a moment what was happening in Libya? Wikipedia under “death of Gadhafi” writes in mid 2011:
“After the fall of Tripoli to forces of the opposition National Transitional Council (NTC) in August 2011, Gaddafi and his family fled the Libyan capital. He was widely rumoured to have taken refuge in the south of the country and in fact Gaddafi had fled in a small convoy to Sirte on the day Tripoli fell. His son Mutassim Gaddafi followed in a second convoy.“
This WAS the so-called Arab Spring which was a way for Obama and the Neocons to bring strife and huge suffering to vast areas of the world by deposing sitting rulers. Is this CIA rule by chaos?
Only a fool would imagine that a protest in the traditional Jihad areas of Syria would be JUST about lack of jobs. If only the world was like that people like Seumus Milne would be happy Little people. But it is not. The Jihad cuts across under its own steam as it were, and related but separate the Neocons (an inprecise term I admit) have been using the Jihad for purposes which may be sinister indeed.
It was not just that Assad put down the protest but that the protest was followed very quickly by arms.
This is the world of “conspiracy” which is not conspiracy thinking a la Ilke because it is as plain as day that the US was arming the Jihad.
This is the tragedy. Assad had nobody to turn to but the Shia reaactionaries and utter Nazi type Antisemites of Hizbullah and Iran.
The biggest crime that Netanyahu has carried out against Israel was in supporting this Jihad against these rulers right down the line.
Netanyahu could easily have said “I defend Assad against this Jihad. I am opposed to the alliance which Assad makes with Hizbullah and Iran” or “I defend Mubarak against this Jihad but I will defend Israel if Mubarak strikes us”
Why not? What was stopping him? Nothing except that he is at heart a Neocon!
This is something that Israelis who are grown up sucking up to US Imperialism are unble to face up to.
America, The West, IS At WAR With Islam: What’s To Be Done? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki
INDEED, it may appear to this site’s vast readership that there is nothing else to concentrate on, ad infinitum, other than Islam’s incessant barbarism against Israel, America and the west in toto.
YES, while there are other pressing concerns which are addressed at this site, the fact remains that since Islam IS at war with Israel, America, and nations which refuse to submit to its dictates, concomitantly, these same nations are at war (they should be) with Islam. Agreed?
IN other words, if the definition of survival is the defense of ones personal safety and national security, surely the above paradigm has to be true. As such, doesn’t it make sense that the highest priority is placed on said (worldwide) incendiary area of concern?
SO atop yesterday’s highlighted commentary it was blared: there is a clash of civilizations. Plain and simple.
BUT it is not enough to just assert a position, sans a concrete evidentiary case. Therefore, the following is more than germane, in order to rip off Islam’s mask!
IN this regard, America’s jihadi cells are primed, and they are ready to blow!
“We are at War with Islam: Muslims in America R Unwelcome Guests”
“A Radical Muslim’ is a ‘Practicing Muslim’, a ‘Moderate Muslim’ is a ‘non Practicing Muslim’ or otherwise known as an Apostate of Islam” – by Dave Gaubatz (Islam Exposed: Ask the Expert …ISIS, Islam And Obama: Understanding The Threat To The Free World)
By keeping in mind my definition of Practicing and non Practicing Muslims, we should have shown the door to Muslims the day after Sept. 11, 2001. Sharia law and the U.S. Constitution are not compatible and only one can operate in America. I pick the U.S. Constitution.
We must stop kidding ourselves about Islam. This ideology is very dangerous and has no place in this world, especially in America. How many examples of violence in the name of Islam does it require to convince people Islam and Sharia law go together. They are one in the same. Sharia law is the 10 Commandments equivalent of Christianity. You can no more as a Muslim practice Islam without Sharia law than a Christian could practice Christianity without the 10 Commandments.
It appears to be a simple solution to help prevent Islamic based terrorist attacks in America we should deport ‘all’ Muslims who practice Islam. We should shutdown all mosques and Islamic centers. We must close all of the acronyms related to Islam, beginning with CAIR National.
America and Americans have always been a land of friendly people and we have built America by allowing from all over the world migrate to this beautiful country. From the beginning though we should have insisted all Americans must pledge allegiance to America. Is this asking too much?
Muslims are taught to show no allegiance to any person, government, or country. CAIR and ISNA send out brochures informing Muslims to not pledge their allegiance to America. This should be a hint to senior law enforcement and politicians that trouble may arise from the people who will not show their allegiance to America.
Here are a list of words that mean the opposite of allegiance:
MIND you, stating the obvious is an unpopular position to stake out. Boo hoo. Regardless, there is no other alternative, when one understands what is at stake. But for some added disinfectant, listen to what Thomas Jefferson had to say, afterwards, we can segue to Winston Churchill’s foresight.
The First Barbary War (1801–1805) also known as the Tripolitan War or the Barbary Coast War, was the first of two wars fought between the United States and the Northwest African Berber Muslim states known collectively as the Barbary States. These were the Ottoman provinces of Tripoli, Algiers, and Tunis, which were enjoying a large autonomy, as well as the independent Sultanate of Morocco. The war was fought because U.S. President Thomas Jefferson refused to pay the high tributes demanded by the Barbary states and because they were seizing American merchant ships and enslaving the crews for high ransoms. It was the first declared war the United States fought on foreign land and seas.
In 1786, Jefferson and John Adams met with Tripoli’s ambassador to Great Britain. They asked this ‘diplomat’ by what right his nation attacked American ships and enslaved her citizens and why the Muslims held such hostility toward this new nation, with which neither Tripoli nor any of the other Barbary Coast nations had any previous contact. The answer was quite revealing. Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja (the ambassador) replied that Islam:
“Was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Qur’an, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
READERS, as promised, let Winston Churchill’s sage advice ring in your ears:
“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity.
The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities – but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.”
As the Liberty Party press release on Weston’s arrest noted, following this portion of his remarks:
“Reportedly a woman came out of the Guildhall and asked Mr Weston if he had the authorisation to make this speech. When he answered that he didn’t, she told him “It’s disgusting!” and then called the police.
Six or seven officers arrived. They talked with the people standing nearby, asking questions about what had happened. The police had a long discussion with Mr Weston, lasting about 40 minutes.
At about 3pm he was arrested. They searched him, put him in a police van and took him away.”
ABSOLUTELY, Europe has gone off the rails. But the question begs asking: is America next?
IN the immortal words of George Santayana, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
“We started with stones and will end with a state.” And no amount of genocidal incitement and calls for mass murder will stop the UN, Europe, and Obama from doing all they can to give them one.
“Fatah Facebook Page Incites Terror Hours After Stabbings,” by Tova Dvorin, Arutz Sheva, January 21, 2015:
The Palestinian Authority (PA)’s ruling Fatah party has uploaded a number of posts encouraging incitement against Israelis and Jews in the past several hours, the Government Press Office revealed Wednesday.
Hours after a Palestinian Arab terrorist embarked on a stabbing spree in the heart of Tel Aviv, Fatah uploaded this photo to its page promoting more terror:
Caption: “We started with stones and will end with a state.” Fatah Facebook page
The photo shows a number of means of committing terror attacks, including the rocks, knives, Molotov cocktails, guns, grenades, and various rifles.
Both Tuesday and Wednesday, Fatah uploaded photos glorifying known terrorists, as well. Both are guilty of murdering tens of Israelis in well-known attacks.
One of the terrorists who participated in the March 1975 terrorist attack on the Savoy Hotel in Tel Aviv in which 11 Israelis were murdered.Fatah Facebook page
Ra’ed Carmi, a Fatah archmurderer from the second intifada. The photograph, which marks the day of his death, takes pride in the fact that he was directly responsible for deaths of 165 Israelis and the wounding of over 1,800 others.Fatah Facebook page
Fatah has often used its Facebook page as a vehicle for incitement, and activity on its social media accounts to this end have increased over the past several months….
Felix Quigley answers this evil hatred of a people by David Icke. The following appears on the David Icke website. Icke has taken this from “MiddleEastMonitor” and this scurrilous charácter Icke is saying this Jewish soldier gives water to a Palestinian Arab woman, has a photo taken for propaganda purposes and then shoots her in the head. Meanwhile this horror calumny against the Jewish people is carried onto the airways thanks to British Jew Martin Nathan and his radio station Talk Radio Europe … on which station many Jewish people are working and are associated with. The spawn of Icke a person called “Richie Allen” is offered 2 hours nightly for publication of this kind of stuff. Am I the only person fighting against this I cry out in anguish?
‘During the Israeli bombardment and shelling of the Gaza Strip last summer, an Israeli soldier approached a 74-year-old Palestinian woman Ghalya Abu-Rida to give her a sip of water. He gave her the water, took a photo with her and then he shot her in the head from a distance of one metre. He then watched as she bled to death, the Palestine Information Centre reported.
This is how Ahmad Qdeh, a journalist in Al-Aqsa TV, described the scene that he witnessed during the latest Israeli aggression. The spokesman of the Israeli army, Avichay Adraee, shared the photo of an Israeli soldier holding the water bottle and helping the old woman drink as an example of the “humanity” of the Israeli army towards the civilians in the Gaza Strip.’
Why should it be a scam David Icke?
The Islamic State and the Jihad is all too real for millions of the poorest people int he world who are now living as refugees and it is no scam for the Young girls being raped daily by these ISIS scumbags.
So what is scam about this Icke. Is it not you Icke who is the scum in this case?
And why should it be a surprise that capitalism and NATO through Turkey (Obama’s best friend) are supplying the Islamic State Islam fanatics? They did exactly the same under Clinton to Izetbegovic in Bosnia.
And your spawn last night on Talk Radio Europe roared that he could not give an “arse” about the Japanese threatened with beheading by the scum of Islamic State. That is your best chum the man who murders English each night in his phoney Irish Waterford slur.
The real tragedy is that Talk Radio Europe is owned by a Jewish English man called Martin Nathan and he is giving you Icke a platform which you really do not deserve
From Ickes site Headlines at top http://www.davidicke.com: (Icke takes it from prisonplanet.com)
Wednesday 21st January 2015 at 09:50 By David Icke
Turkey’s prime minister, a NATO ally, is shipping arms to al-Qaeda and ISIS via Syria-bound trucks operated by the country’s intelligence agency, according to Turkish military officials.
Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu banned media from reporting on three of the trucks searched by the military’s Gendarmerie General Command, which discovered 45 to 55 missiles or rockets, 30 to 40 crates of ammunition, including mortar rounds, and Douchka anti-aircraft ammunition.
“The trucks were carrying weapons and supplies to the al-Qaeda terror organization,” a report by the Gendarmerie General Command stated.
Davutoglu also removed public prosecutor Aziz Takei from office for ordering the search. Additionally, the 13 soldiers involved in the search have been charged with espionage and are facing 20-year prison terms.
Qur’an 9:29, “Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low.”
Ibn Kathir’s 14th century commentary  expresses the classical Muslim orthodoxy on Qur’an 9:29 — the verse which links the unique Islamic institution of jihad war, integrally, to the imposition of the pact of submission (or “dhimma”) upon the vanquished “Scriptured” (or “dhimmi”) peoples, primarily Jews and Christians:
…when the People of the Scriptures disbelieved in Muhammad, they had no beneficial faith in any Messenger or what the Messengers brought. Rather they followed their religions because this conformed with their ideas, lusts, and the ways of their forefathers, not because they are Allah’s laws and religion. Had they been true believers in their religions, that faith would have directed them to believe in Muhammad because all Prophets gave the good news of Muhammad’s advent and commanded them to obey and follow him. Yet when he was sent, they disbelieved in him, even though he is the mightiest of all Messengers. Therefore, they do not follow the religion of earlier Prophets because these religions came from Allah, but because these suit their desires and lusts. Therefore, their claimed faith in an earlier Prophet will not benefit them because they disbelieved in the master, the mightiest, the last and most perfect of all Prophets. Hence Allah’s statement “Fight against those who believe not in Allah, nor in the Last Day, nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth among the People of the Scripture”
This honorable Ayah was revealed with the order to fight the People of the Book, after the pagans were defeated, the people entered Allah’s region in large numbers, and the Arabian Peninsula was secured under the Muslims’ control.
(Information above from Bill Warner’s Abridged Koran [An Abridged Koran (The Islamic Trilogy Book 4) [Kindle Edition] )
If I was a Jew and the Holocaust was right there on my landscape (understatement cannot put this into words actually) then I would want to know why. Francisco Gil White (When Hitler came to power in 1933 outrages against the German Jews began immediately… http://www.hirhome.com/israel/leaders0.htm) sidesteps the issue and goes on to talk about a Jewish Boycott but does not tell us that that was AFTER the event. By “event” I mean what precisely? I mean the seizure of power by the Nazis in 1933. It is mostly hidden but it was possible to have Hitler stopped in 1933. His election vote was actually going down (fairly well known). There were battalions able and willing to stop this fiend and these fiends from taking the state power in that Germany in those 1930s. There was a massive trade union and labour movement in Germany huge battalions of workers organised inside the unions. Looking at it with a cool eye it seems to me certain that the masses of German organised workers knew or at the very least sensed the great danger from the Nazis – not necessarily danger to the Jews but just simply danger. But the leaders betrayed. How they betrayed is for another story but they did. And Hitler strolled into state power. The first thing Hitler did was to pulverise all independent (not just labour) but all independent voices. The concentration camps waited even for those leaders who had helped him take state power.
There is something similar in Islam. The Mohammedan tax on the Kafir is (though not the modern phenomenon of Fascism) the same thing in essence. The payer of the tax did not only have to pay the tax he had to pay it with his belly on the ground and ready to feel the whip of his Master. The paying of this tax was also a statement that I (with my belly on the ground and my face in the dirt) can never get my hands on the state power. Muslims rule through the state, If not precisely the same thing that Hitler did in 1933 it is uncannily close. The state is the key issue in all of these issues. Hitler knew or again at least sensed all of this which is why Hitler more and more began to have a love for Islam and unease with Christianity. Islam did nor waffle. The Popes and Archbishops of Canterbury – they waffle (exception being the more intellectual Benedict see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regensburg_lecture)Islam like the Nazis go straight for the jugular. Today much of what Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller report on is the effort (successful) to keep the Kafir from actually ruling (using state power) against the Jihad.
THE LATEST THIS MORNING (SUNDAY) ON THE CRITICAL SITUATION FACING THE 5 PER CENT CHRISTIANS IN NIGER)
FELIX QUIGLEY SAYS…
On BBC news this Sunday morning it is TEN Churches burned
Niger is very important and is very instructional. There is 95 per cent Muslim population, 5 per cent other mainly Christian.
This is how I read it correct me if wrong. The 95 per cent Muslim are rooted in the Koran. This may be a passive rootedness not unlike the prejudices that surrounded Christians, with reference to Judas being the traitor and the Jews who killed the “saviour”, a prejudice that can lie underneath for a long time, but at times become critical.
There is along with that 95 per cent the profesional inflamers of these underlying prejudices. That is happening in scores of different countries as we speak. Niger has a very long border with the critical Nigeria, the largest African country population wise, a country much divided on itself which never really got over the Biafran Civil War tending to drive towards pacifism in its aftermath. As an aside this happens a lot and Ireland is an example where the dead alley of the Irish Civil War post-1921 “Independence” encouraged revisionist thinking about the concept of independence itself. This weakening of nation is fertile ground for Islam Jihad. So in Nigeria there is a large army but the army is almost pacifist in spirit, thinking and tactics. This may be a part explanation but at least helps to understand how Nigerian army conscripts lay down their arms and flee in the face of the Islamic State savages, whereas the Kurd fighters including their women stand and fight the savage enemy of the Jihad.
In all of these countries like Niger there is a very unstable political situation to start with. Then along with that there is the promotion of Jihad and of Islam by Obama, by the Democrats, by parts of the republican side like McCain, and there is promotion of Jihad on a broad canvas by ALL European Governments, the centre of which focus is the lethal poison of Antisemitic “Palestinianism” (and here I have to honour the memory of Joan Peters who died recently)
The comments on Jihadwatch above are spot on. I am a Trotskyist socialist revolutionary and I agree with them 100 per cent.
The above was placed as a comment on the excellent http://www.jihadwatch.com.
Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts
Niger: Muslim mobs ransack churches, burn French cultural center, in cartoon rage
http://www.jihadwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/charlie_protest.jpghttp://www.jihadwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/charlie_protest.jpgThe Western intelligentsia’s response to this savagery will likely be to call for voluntary self-censorship so as not to offend Muslims — rather than to call for a robust defense of the freedom of speech and resolute stand against these violent attempts to make the non-Muslim world conform to Sharia blasphemy laws.
“Niger protests over Charlie Hebdo Prophet Mohammed cartoon leaves four dead and 45 injured,” AFP, January 16, 2015 (thanks to Anne Crockett):
Four people were killed and 45 injured in a day of violent protests in Niger’s second city against French magazine Charlie Hebdo’s publication of a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed.
Massaoudou Hassoumi, the interior minister, said a policeman and three civilians died in Friday’s disturbances in Zinder in which three churches were ransacked and the French cultural centre was burned down.
Thousands of protesters gathered outside mosques after Friday prayers to vent anger at the depiction of the prophet, which is considered taboo to most Muslims.
Twenty-two members of the security forces and 23 protesters were hurt in the ensuing clashes, national radio reported, as one Catholic and two Protestant churches were attacked.
A doctor in the city’s hospital told AFP that all of the dead and three of the injured had gunshot wounds….
There are excellent commenters on Jihadwatch and this was no different:
Obama brought the full weight of the west to overthrow the secular leaders like Ben Ali, Gaghbo, and here Mubarak and Gadhafi in favor of the Jihadists their mortal enemies. It will not be easy for el Sisi
FELIX QUIGLEY SAYS…At the end Martin Sherman writes
“So while Sisi’s endeavor should be warmly applauded – and supported – its chances of success are sufficiently uncertain – indeed, remote – that it would be more than imprudent of the West and for Israel to make any assumption of such success a basis for future policy.”
That is a wise warning.
Ben Shapiro took on Ben Affleck and the myth that only a tiny minority of Muslims worldwide are radical. Shapiro based his thoughts on this so vital matter on the Pew Poll Research. There are huge numbers in ALL of these countries like Egypt who are in favor of Sharia Law, or aspects of Sharia Law, such as hand cutting for theft. This is the culture of 1500 years of indoctrination by Islam.
It therefore cannot be easy and it is well to know this. But there is one other factor which is absolutely central. There is the role of the world capitalist governments of all types, especially the US Governments and the European states. Their role is to defend and prop up, even promote, Islam.
And note it well there is only ONE Islam. It is based on the Koran. Note the extreme confusión that even the valiant el Sisi throws up on thiis very score.
But back to those governments. The Arab secular governments have met not just the wrath of the Islam but also the wrath of those very governments. Obama insisted on overthrowing Mubarak and he invited the Muslim Brothers in Egypt to attend his first public occasion in Cairo. Remember that. Then on to Ivory Coast, Tunisia, above all to the war on Gadhafi. Britain and France were to the very fore in this.
So that is the enemy. It is a huge enemy indeed. The Fascist left like the David Icke spawn are playing perhaps a key roll where even the murder of cartoonists in Paris and Jews in a Kosher establishment are being changed, morphing into sheer Antisemitism – the Palestinian Arab ANTISEMITIC narrative enters everything.
Martin is right. This is a huge task. Please let us discuss the implications with an open mind.
Into the Fray: Sisi or ISIS?
It’s difficult to overstate the potential importance of the Egyptian president’s New Year speech on Islam – and equally important to avoid overly optimistic expectations as to its practical impact.
It is possible that $1.6 Billion people [Muslims] should want to kill the rest of the world’s inhabitants – that is 7 billion – so that they themselves may live? Impossible!” – Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, Al-Azhar, January 1
“O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who keep their duty.” – Koran, Sura 9:123
“Violence… occurs between Muslims, on the one hand, and Orthodox Serbs in the Balkans, Jews in Israel, Hindus in India, Buddhists in Burma and Catholics in the Philippines. Islam has bloody borders.” – Samuel Huntington, “The Clash of Civilizations?” Foreign Affairs, 1993
On New Year’s Day, Egyptian president Abdel Fattah al-Sisi delivered a remarkable address at Cairo’s Al-Azhar University.
The Obama-Sisi contrast
He directed measured, but nonetheless severe, censure at much of the Islamic clergy, their interpretation of religious texts and their prescription for how Muslims should practice their faith in the modern day: “I am referring here to the religious clerics. We have to think hard about what we are facing – and I have, in fact, addressed this topic a couple of times before. It’s inconceivable that the thinking that we hold most sacred should cause the entire umma [Islamic world] to be a source of anxiety, danger, killing and destruction for the rest of the world. Impossible!”
Ironically, Sisi spoke at the same venue that Barack Obama chose to deliver his 2009 “Outreach Speech” to the Muslim world. But the contrast between the two could hardly be more striking. As one US analyst deftly noted: “Obama began the 2009 speech by praising the same seminary that Sisi reprimanded,” emphasizing “That [Obama’s approach] is different from Sisi, who is trying to suppress the Brotherhood movement and push Al-Azhar’s Islamic leaders toward modernity.”
Sisi used the occasion to condemn the ongoing practices in the Islamic world, after having coercively removed the regressive and ruinous regime of the Muslim Brotherhood from power. By contrast, Obama heaped effusive praise on Islam, and insisted on places of honor for senior Brotherhood representatives – to the chagrin of his host, president Hosni Mubarak. Indeed, many consider Obama’s words and gestures in Cairo as providing a considerable – arguably, crucial – fillip in the process that swept the Brotherhood to power barely two years later.
Revolution not reform
Although Sisi was at pains to appear respectful to Islam as a religion per se, there was little doubt as to the grim view he took of the consequences of the manner in which Muslims were being instructed to observe their faith.
“That thinking – I am not saying ‘religion’ but ‘thinking’ – that corpus of texts and ideas that we have sacralized over the years, to the point that departing from them has become almost impossible, is antagonizing the entire world!” he said.
Sisi appealed to the religious establishment for a “more enlightened perspective”: “I am saying these words here at Al-Azhar, before this assembly of scholars and ulema [top Islamic scholars] – Allah Almighty be witness to your truth on Judgment Day concerning that which I’m talking about now…you cannot feel it if you remain trapped within this mindset. You need to step outside of yourselves to be able to… reflect on it from a more enlightened perspective.”
But despite his ostensible deference, Sisi made no bones about what was called for. Not gradual reform but swift revolution. “I say and repeat again that we are in need of a religious revolution. You, imams, are responsible before Allah. The entire world, I say it again, the entire world is waiting for your next move,” he urged.
Tendency to appease
Sisi is undoubtedly correct in his diagnosis of Islam as comprising “a source of anxiety, danger, killing and destruction for the rest of the world.” However, until recently the tendency of the “rest of the world” has been to appease rather than oppose, to understand rather than withstand, to excuse rather than expunge.
Nonetheless, lately there does appear to be the beginning of rumbling discontent in the West, and indications that resistance to Islamic-inspired outrages is beginning to emerge – albeit far too timidly and far too slowly.
It is still too early to assess whether the savage slaughter in Paris last week will prove a tipping-point in the mood toward Islam and shift it from angst to anger. There is, however, considerable room for skepticism.
For despite the short-term uproar the killings at Charlie Hebdo and Hyper Cacher has generated, the death toll pales when compared to far-greater Muslim-motivated atrocities perpetrated in the West without producing a sustained, resolute response to deal adequately with the manifest menace.
With 17 dead, last week in Paris seems unlikely to become a watershed event. After all, the Madrid train bombings left 191 dead and 1,800 wounded in 2004; the London subway bombing 52 dead and 700 wounded in 2005; the Mumbai attacks almost 170 killed and over 600 injured in 2008, and the Moscow metro bombing 40 dead and over 100 injured in 2010. This of course is but a minute sample of a long, gory list of post 9/11 Muslim massacres, carried out in the name of their religious belief.
Islam’s bloody borders
It is difficult to see why the ordeal in Paris, gruesome as it was, will produce the required stiffening of resolve.
After all, the incipient clash between the Islamic and non-Islamic worlds has been part of the public discourse for over two decades. In his controversial – some might say, prescient – article “The Clash of Civilizations?” in Foreign Affairs (1993), the late Harvard political scientist Samuel Huntington predicted: “The fault lines between civilizations will be the battle lines of the future.” He warned: “… the great historic fault lines between civilizations are once more aflame. This is particularly true along the… boundaries of the… Islamic bloc of nations, from the bulge of Africa to central Asia…. Islam has bloody borders.”
In a subsequent book, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (1998), Huntington wrote: “No single statement in my Foreign Affairs article attracted more critical comment than: ‘Islam has bloody borders.’… Quantitative evidence from every disinterested source conclusively demonstrates its validity.”
Subsequent events and statistics strongly corroborate Huntington’s contentions.
Bloody borders (cont.)
It is possible to fill tomes with examples of obdurate Islamic enmity to Judaism and Christianity. But Islamic intolerance is not confined to the monotheistic People of the Book.
One of the most graphic illustrations of Islam’s abiding rejection of all that is not Islamic is provided by the 2001 destruction of the giant Buddha statues in Afghanistan.
The statues, which stood for 15 centuries (!) were designated by UNESCO as a World Heritage Site, and were perhaps the best-known cultural landmark of the region. Despite all this, and ignoring international appeals, the Taliban government reduced the statues to rubble, in a determined, prolonged and complex effort.
According to the then-Afghan culture minister, 400 religious clerics from across the country decided the “statues were un-Islamic.”
The Taliban’s spiritual leader and supreme commander Mullah Muhammad Omar, proclaimed: “Muslims should be proud of smashing idols. It has given praise to God that we have destroyed them.” The then-foreign minister told a Japanese daily: “We are destroying the Buddha statues in accordance with Islamic law… it is purely a religious issue.”
This implacable enmity toward the un-Islamic is reflected in the appalling statistics regarding Islamic violence.
Some estimates indicate that since 9/11, there have been a staggering 25,000 lethal acts of Islamic terrorism.
Islam’s bloody innards
In his Al-Azhar address, Sisi issued a stern warning: “… this umma [Islamic world] is being torn, it is being destroyed, it is being lost – and it is being lost by our own hands.” The warning is timely and accurate.
For, as I pointed out in last week’s column, as appalling as Muslim violence against non-Muslims might be, it pales into insignificance when compared to violence among Muslims themselves.
In a sense, Sisi was echoing views Huntington articulated in his book: “Islam’s borders are bloody and so are its innards. The fundamental problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism. It is Islam, a different civilization whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and… obsessed with the inferiority of their power.”
Judging from the scope of the carnage, Islam’s innards are if anything bloodier than its borders, and the enmity for fellow Muslims far outstrips that for the infidel.
Quite apart from the well-known Sunni- Shia rift that has resulted in untold deaths, the myriad massacres in mosques, marketplaces and madrassas across Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and elsewhere in the Muslim-dominated Dar a-Salaam (Zone of Peace) make it impossible for anyone other than a learned expert to decipher the patterns of intra-Islamic rivalries and the reasons for their lethal consequences.
Sisi’s passionate cry that the Muslim world is being torn apart at its own hands is corroborated everyday by a never-ending stream of blood-soaked facts.
‘No stronger retrograde force exists…’
Well over 100 years ago, in his book The River War (1899), Winston Churchill predicted with stunning prescience much of the realities which Sisi laments in his New Year address: “How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful, fatalistic apathy.”
Churchill warned of adverse effects on Muslim economies and societies: “The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live… the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.”
On Islam’s attitude to women, he wrote: “The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.”
Regarding conflict with the West, he provided an ominous caveat: “Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science… the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome… ”
Given the situation in Europe today, this is a prognosis that should not be lightly dismissed.
Ataturk or Anwar Sadat?
It’s difficult to overstate the importance that Sisi’s speech could have – and equally important to exercise sober caution in developing excessively optimistic expectations as to the practical impact it may have.
Earlier this week, the influential US columnist George Will raised both the prospects and the perils: “…as head of the Egyptian state, Al Sisi occupies an office once occupied by Anwar Sadat who was murdered by Islamic extremists for his opening to Israel. This was an act of tremendous bravery by Sisi, and if the Nobel Peace Prize committee is looking for someone who plausibly deserves it, they could start there.”
Will Sisi be able to initiate a Kemalist-like transformation of Egypt as Kemal Ataturk did in Turkey just under a hundred years ago (and now disintegrating rapidly under the Islamist Erdogan regime)? The answer is far from certain. The times and circumstances in today’s Egypt are vastly different – and arguably more daunting – than those in post-WWI Turkey.
Egypt faces almost insurmountable socioeconomic challenges, and failure by Sisi to address them adequately will provide his numerous radical opponents much grist for their extremist mills to grind.
Recent reports (The Jerusalem Post, January 12) that a newly exposed Islamic State-affiliated cell that “planned to assassinate government ministers, media personalities and businessmen in the coming days” dramatically underscore how a tragic rerun of political assassination in Egypt cannot be discounted.
So while Sisi’s endeavor should be warmly applauded – and supported – its chances of success are sufficiently uncertain – indeed, remote – that it would be more than imprudent of the West and for Israel to make any assumption of such success a basis for future policy.
Sisi, ISIS & Israel
The outcome of the titan battle between Sisi and Islamic State will, of course, have dramatic impact on Israel, particularly with regard to the fate of Sinai, and the ramifications this will have on our long southern border and the city of Eilat.
But that is a topic for another – and somewhat depressing – article in the future.
Martin Sherman (www.martinsherman.org) is the founder and executive director of the Israel Institute for Strategic Studies http://www.strategicisrael.org.
Felix Quigley writes…Many have written on this but they completely miss the point and misread the situation. The Butchery in Charlie Hebco and the Jewish shop on Paris (and it is often overlooked that in Charlie’s the Jewish woman was picked out because she was a Jew) the point being that it has created an entirely different situation.The Israeli politicians are proceeding as if it was the same.The old himming and hamming in Israel has to end because it will not work anymore.In one sense they are right. Why should French Jews come and be attacked by Arabs in Judea? Why? That is a total sacrilege.The fact is that the French situation poses new rsponsibilities on the Israeli leaders none of whom including Bennett are able to take the measures needed. THAT is the point.What measures’ Complete complete war on Palestinianism aka Islam aka Jihad aka Mohammedanism
Meretz Chairman MK Zahava Gal-On intends to petition the Attorney General to stop plans from Minister of Construction Uri Ariel (Jewish Home) to house immigrants from France in Judea and Samaria.
Ariel sent a letter asking the Yesha Council where the flow of immigrants from France could settle, as France reels from a string of anti-Semitic attacks.
France led the list of countries from which Jews made aliyah to Israel in 2014, with almost 7,000 new French immigrants, more than double the 3,400 who came last year. Aliyah is only expected to increase after the latest spate of anti-Semitic attacks.
Ariel ordered officials from the Ministry of Housing and Construction and the Israel Lands Authority to plan the expansion of Judea and Samaria communities, which have suffered multiple building freezes, to absorb immigrants.
“There is no doubt that the French Jews feel deep sympathy with the settlement enterprise in Judea and Samaria,” Ariel wrote, “and they may want to reside there.”
Gal-On vowed Wednesday to contact Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein to contest the plan, following a similar reaction from far-left Channel 2 commentator Amnon Abramovich.
Abramovich argued that French Jews, who are already fleeing from a rising tide of Islamism in their home country, would feel distinctly uncomfortable moving to a region whereby the Jewish communities are surrounded by Arabs – and, often, villages with high levels of support for Hamas. France has seen a sharp rise in anti-Semitism in recent years, and it flared particularly in 2014 and during Operation Protective Edge, with violent protests in Paris.
Labor leaders Tzipi Livni and Yitzhak Herzog further slammed the plan as a “cynical move that will hurt Israel’s international standing” that will “deepen the isolation Bibi [Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu – ed.] got us into” and “deeply hurt our relations with world Jewry.”
Also see Pamela Geller for this story…Muslim Cleric Leads Funeral Prayer For Charlie Hebdo Jihadis, Justifies Murder By Precedent Set By Muhammad There is a large part of the Muslim world that celebrates and supports the slaughter of the Charlie Hebdo journalists and cartoonists in the cause of Muhammad. Instead, we are bullied into talking only of those Muslims who are not strapping one on. Why? “Indian Islamic Cleric Maulana Naseeruddin Leads Funeral Prayer For Charlie Hebdo – See more at: http://pamelageller.com/#sthash.oHdr4dNw.dpuf
FELIX QUIGLEY SAYS…WHAT A CONTRAST WITH THE COWARDLY AND PRO-ISLAM STALINIST LEFT OF TODAY IS GEERT WILDERS! HE REFERS TO “The denial that Islam is the cause” AND THIS IS PRACTISED BY ALL OF THE LEFT OF TODAY, ALL OF THEM, AND THAT JUST MEANS THAT THE TROTSKYIST ALTERNATIVE, AUTHENTIC TROTSKYISM, MUST BE CONSTRUCTED. THE LEFT IS NOT THE CAUSE THOUGH. THE REAL CAUSE IS THAT THE SYSTEM OF CAPITALISM ROTS TO THE CORE AND THESE REVISIONIST SOCIALISTS ARE SIMPLY REFLECTING THE ANTISEMITISM INHERENT WITHIN CAPITALISM. BUT THAT IS A LONGER STORY. FOR NOW I SALUTE THIS RESPONSE BY GEERT WILDERS!
THANKS TO WWW.GATESOFVIENNA.NET
Many thanks to SimonXML for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:
Madam President, I am extremely angry. I am furious. Frankly, my party is furious. Furious that once again there have been innocent victims of Islam. Jews, critics of Islam, innocent people.
And also very angry because there are the same politically correct responses. The denial that Islam is the cause. The failure to make the Netherlands safer.
And, madam president, I wonder how many more debates will be needed, how many more attacks there will have to be, how many more innocent people will have to die before the penny drops. Before the cabinet and the majority of this Chamber wake up. It’s enough to drive you mad.
I don’t understand it at all, and I am justifiably extremely angry about it. Not just because I am also on the Al-Qaeda hit list, but because this concerns the safety of the Netherlands. The safety of the Dutch.
What is needed, madam president, and what is currently missing is a good analysis of the cause and the right solution for all this terror. The cause, madam president, is of course Islam. Islam that declared war against us a long time ago. The Islamization of the Free West. Of the Netherlands. Of Europe.
Of course there are peaceful Muslims. But there is no such thing as peaceful Islam. And of course not all Muslims are terrorists. And anyone who still dares to deny that there is a link between the terror and Islam is crazy.
Madam President, Islamization is a life-threatening danger. For decades, mass immigration has been bringing hundreds of thousands of people from an alien culture to Europe. To our country. Why do we import all this misery? Madam President, everywhere, wherever it comes, Islam brings us hate and violence. In every country where Islam is strong it is at the cost of freedom. Freedom of speech, of journalists, minorities, everyone.
Madam president, and that’s without mentioning the terror organizations such as the Islamic State, Al Qaeda, Al Nusra, to name just a few.
Islam, madam president, simply does not belong in the Netherlands. It is a danger to the Netherlands. We must de-Islamize.
Madam President, apart from this analysis, what is particularly shocking is the total inanity of the terror measures. I find it inconceivable that after all these years of debate, the Cabinet proposes measures that will cause more problems in the Netherlands rather than fewer. How is it possible — I can’t explain it to anyone in our country — that Jihadis who want to go to Syria to do the most horrific things there, are stopped? It’s unbelievable. Let them go! All of them! We should be glad to see the back of them.
We don’t do that, the Cabinet doesn’t do that. They don’t even put the people they stop in prison, leaving ticking time bombs, Islamic terrorists, to roam free in the Netherlands. That should not be possible!
Let the people leave, madam president, but never let them come back. Take away their passports, revoke the Schengen Treaty and reinstate border controls. That legislative proposals are now being made that we should have seen ten years ago. Ten years ago. That is what the Netherlands deserved and that is what the analysis justifies.
And I completely fail to understand why the Cabinet lets the Jihadists come back. How stupid can you be?
Of the people that have returned, I believe that three have been imprisoned and the rest have been left free to walk around. It’s enough to drive you mad. Madam President, from all other Schengen countries — that’s 25 not counting the Netherlands — people can also simply come to the Netherlands. Thousands of terrorists. According to Europol, 5,000 can simply come to the Netherlands.
What in heaven’s name are you doing? I’m not speaking in Chinese, am I? Surely we don’t want all those people to come to the Netherlands?
Madam President, what I also don’t understand is that the army is deployed to Mali, is deployed to Afghanistan, while it should of course be protecting vital points in the Netherlands such as railway stations, airports, shopping malls and streets. Yesterday, the front page of a national newspaper had a report that Amsterdam is a target. What are the military doing in Mali? Let them protect this country.
Madam President, these are big words but I do mean them. Of course the Cabinet is not responsible for every attack. But if someone who could have been stopped when coming back to the Netherlands. Or if someone that the Cabinet prevented from going to Syria without putting them in prison. Or if someone comes to the Netherlands from another Schengen country and carries out an attack, this Cabinet has blood on its hands. And that is a terrible thing to have to say.
And, Prime Minister, never say that you were not warned. In the last ten years I have told you and your predecessors a thousand times. You will never be able to get away with the words “wir haben es nicht gewusst”. You did know. You have known it for years.
So make the right analysis, make the Netherlands safer. Do not drive myself and the Netherlands to despair. Put an end to the incompetence.
This, madam president, after all these years, is no longer party politics. It concerns the safety of our country. The safety of our citizens. And the Cabinet lets it happen.
Madam president, fortunately, the tide in Europe and in the Netherlands is turning. More and more people in Europe are fed up with all the people who look the other way. In Germany, 40,000 people took to the streets the other night to demonstrate against Islamization. Parties such as the PVV are growing throughout the whole of Europe.
People have had enough. Enough of Islamization. Enough of members of the political elite who look the other way.
And I have been telling the Prime Minister, even though he will not listen to me. You cannot put the genie back in the bottle. They are the people, not you. They will turn the tide, madam president, and turn it must.
Because enough is enough.
FELIX QUIGLEY SAYS…David Icke and his spawns are spreading the lethal lies that Israel is responsable for Antisemitism. This is the same way that the German Nazis and all Antisemites blame the Jews for being Jews and thus for the Holocaust.
The following is one of many articles on the David Icke website under “Headlines” in which Icke draws heavily from the fascist and Antisemitic Iranian PressTV. It is full of Holocaust denial and Jew Hatred
It is carried nightly into Europe by the David Icke spawn Richie Allen Show and helping Icke and Allen to do this is Talk Radio Europe …but the most significant thing about this is that Talk Radio Europe is owned by British Jewish man Martin Nathan and there are many Jews working for Martin Nathan on that very radio station. I simply ask how do they do it?
How can these Jews on Talk Radio Europe (based in Marbella Spain) betray their own historical and much persecuted people so seriously and grievously?
Below is extract from this fiend David Icke:
‘A British Middle East expert believes that there is “a rising tide of anti-Israelism” around the globe due to the Israeli regime’s atrocities against the people of Palestine.
“What we are seeing in Europe today and in fact all around the world, is the rising tide of anti-Israelism which is not the same as the anti-Semitism and it is provoked by Israel’s defiance of the international law its crimes and denial of the justice of the Palestinians,” Alan Hart told Press TV on Wednesday.
His comments come against the backdrop of a new survey which suggests that nearly half of Britons hold anti-Semitic views.’
Felix Quigley says: This is a very big warning indeed and it shows that the capitalist system is preparing dictatorship but not at all in the way that the stalinist left and revisionist left are saying. Here Obama spells it out. Dictatorship is being prepared by banning those who are opponents of Islam.
This is what David icke and his spawn Richie Allen (born Waterford) are lying about. It is complete lies.
And friend of Allen Steven Ritson on Talk Radio Europe did not oppose the banning of Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer from Britain. Ritson only attacked Pamela when I raised her banning on a radio show.
It is absolutely vital to defend democratic rights but sadly these rights haver to be defended against these kinds of people.
If you cannot oppose the banning of Pamela from Britaion what are you but a friend of British Imperialism!
(from Pamela Geller)
“White House: Obama Will Fight Media To Stop Anti-Jihad Articles” Neil Munro, Daily Caller, January 13, 2015
President Barack Obama has a moral responsibility to push back on the nation’s journalism community when it is planning to publish anti-jihadi articles that might cause a jihadi attack against the nation’s defenses forces, the White House’s press secretary said Jan. 12.
“The president … will not now be shy about expressing a view or taking the steps that are necessary to try to advocate for the safety and security of our men and women in uniform” whenever journalists’ work may provoke jihadist attacks, spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters at the White House’s daily briefing. –
The cancer that afflicted so many members of Jimmy Carter’s family has obviously taken hold and eaten away at large portions of his brains.
He has gone mad. Off the rails, no holds barred mad.
“Jimmy Carter: Jews Safer in France than Israel,” Free Beacon, January 13, 2015
Former President Jimmy Carter said Tuesday that Jews “on the average” are “safer in France” than in Israel, despite a massive uptick in extremist violence that has targeted Jewish people living in that country.
Carter’s claim came in response to a recent call by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu inviting France’s endangered Jews to move to Israel, the world’s only Jewish state.
Jews have fled Paris en massage due to growing anti-Semitism and the recent the massacre of Jews in a kosher food store by Islamic extremists. The editor of Britain’s Jewish Chronicle said that the problem is so bad that “every single French Jew I know has either left or is actively working out how to leave.”
However, Carter said that Jews are still safer in France than in “some place in Israel,” an apparent reference to areas often struck by terrorism from groups such as Hamas.
“My guess is that the Jews who live in France will maybe not take this as a positive step, and say the only way you can be safe is to go to Israel,” Carter said in an interview with HuffPost Live. “I would guess that you may be, on the average, maybe safer in France than some places in Israel, but I’m not trying to make a judgment.”
Carter also said that the recent attacks in Paris should provide an opportunity for the West to discover what makes Islam “great.”
“I think this is going to give a lot of people incentive to look into Islamicism, what is it about this religion that makes it great, that makes it appeal to really billions of people and to understand that Islamic leaders condemn this kind of terrorism just like the rest of the world,” he said.
Ross and Belman of Israpundit misunderstand what the issue is about. It is not about how good the Charlie Hebto was towards Jews and Israel but it was about the right to publish and not be murdered for publishing. The Israpundit is imbecile and is a danger to all Jews today
This was posted on israpundit (editor Ted Belman) yesterday
bernard ross says:
Bibi joined the fast becoming nazi leaders on the Paris march. Bibi is spineless.
Bibi…he was a speck of dust in the crowd. They were hardly moving such was the jam but as has been wisely commented on Martin Sherman Facebook…they were marching for what? Exactly?
There is a good chance that as far as all these leaders (including Abbas the Holocaust Denier) were concerned they were marching for and to support a new Legislation in each country that will prohibit the exposure of Islam both politically and historically. A speech law! A thought law! As we speak the Irish Dail led by the Irish Labourites are considering a hate speech law. The Irish rebel and socialist revolutionary James Connolly (executed by the British in 1916) founded the Irish Labour Party and would be today aghast! Things change with time. Things do deteriorate,
The only real patriots in France were not there but were behind Marine le Pen and they are not insignificant in numbers, These followers despite nasty dad le Pen are far closer to Israel on the Palestinian Arab enemy of the Jews
A speck of dust. If Netanyahu had real courage he would really lead. This is the severe crisis that the Jews are in. Some say just get out of France. Yes I agree but do Jews not see that this is evading the issue of leadership.
Surely all thoughtful Jewish people must see that that is an evasión of leadership and leads into the bankrupt “Samson” option which is such utter tripe.
The picture above was posted online by the party of Palestinian Arab President Mahmoud Abbas. The picture has skulls with Star of David imprinted and has the words in Arabic alongside “lingering on your skulls”
The Muslim who took over the Jewish kosher store in Paris stated that he did so deliberately and specifically because it was Jewish. Four Jews lost their lives at the hands of this Muslim. The Young son of this Jewish man was in Israel when he heard the news of the murder of his Father,
Abbas is responsable for the Múnich Olympics Massacre and with Arafat for the murder of thousands of Jews in the Intifadas
Oh and he got his doctorate in Stalinist Russia by writing a tract based on Holocaust Denial
This man who is a fiendish Antisemite in the mould of Hajj Amin el Husseini and Hitler walks today in Paris.
That Abbas is welcomed there tells us lots about the nature of the march.
Only one party in France actually fights against the Muslim Jihad which is fed by the immigration into France of some 5 to 6 million Muslims
The majority of these Muslims in France, the great majority, are opposed to the rights of free speech and it was in fighting for this right of free speech that the Charlie cartoonists were murdered.
The French Governments brought these Muslims in. It is the presence of these Muslims in such numbers that mean today that Jewish lives are NOT safe. So Jews must leave France and go to the only country in which they are accepted as Jews and that only country is Israel.
That needs to be emphasised. The Muslims in France are opposed to the free speech rights of the Charlie murdered cartoonists. The Charlie cartoonists were murdered by the same Antisemites of Islam that forcé Jews to flee today.
Today the government heads are walking in order to deflect and in order to pretend that Islam is peace.
That is a very big lie. It is a brazen lie that needs urgently to be exposed by building a mass Trotskyist Party – also to combat the lies of the Stalinist “Liberation” and various antisemite anarchist groups in France
These Government heads say that the cartoonists were murdered by “extremsits” etc but not by Islam
By pretending to be concerned about the Charlie cartoonists the finger from these capitalist politicians points straight against the national Front of Marine le Pen.
In Ireland the Labourites in the Government are planning a law against “Hate Speech” which in reality means a law to prevent us from making a critique of Islam from an historical and contemporary political viewpoint.
Yes they too will march today in Paris.
But freedom of speech was what the Charlie cartoonists were all about.
4international as a Trotskyist movement which defends Israel and Jews say that Netanyahu should not be there. Instead Netanyahu should seek a close Alliance in these political conditions with Marine le Pen and against the ruling clases of Europe
This is not imposible to do but Netanyahu will not do it and I doubt of Bennett would either so it expresses the crisis inside Israel and inside the Jewish people as well.
The man behind this will be narching in Paris this afternoon