THE ISLAMIC JIHAD DOMINATES ALL OF OUR LIVES AND WE STILL DO NOT KNOW WHO THE CO-PILOT REALLY IS

We live in a world of lies.

We still do not know who is the co-pilot of the German plane that was driven into the Alps causing unending suffering and loss for relatives.The simplest answer is that he was a man who suffered from forms of depression and moreover we do not know how this was effected by the nature of the world we live in. Which is without dispute the world of Jihad.

But on 4international we remarked from the beginning that we are continually denied knowledge about Islam.

At the most basic level our sensibilities are atacked by the likes of Karen Armstrong whose claims that Islam in Spain was a good experience for humans went unchallenged and still is unchallenged.

Here I exclude people like Robert Spencer (to pick one of these truthful anti-Jihadists) who does show that Armstrong gives totally false information about Islam in Spain.

But that work of Spencer is not the mass market which is controlled by the Media and by a whole machinery of state governemnts.

Whatever emerges in time (and the Media will not ever give us the truth) about this German co-pilot our world has been turned upsdide down by Islam and by the various forms of its Jihad

This Jihad takes many forms and the most serious form is not violence. It is ideology which is like a cáncer eating into democratic rights. I refer to my comment in this regard relating to Karen Armstrong. But it goes very wide. Do not misunderstand. The violence of Islam is critical (In the midst of this Alps tragedy I watched a stoning on you tube of a Young Somalian girl or woman buried up to her neck and stoned. But it is the interaction of this Jihad violence and human perception especially leadership that is of such moment to us today. (for example the betrayal of what goes for  the “left”)

Also on a purely mechanical level…The action of the co-pilot would not have been possible without 9-11

It was the reaction to 9-11 that meant that new locks were placed on cabin doors the most critical of which was the simple mechanical lock from INSIDE

That reaction to 9-11 was thus indeed the critical reaction that led to the Alps tragedy. Whether that ends up having a link to Islam or not that was central in this.

WAS IT A JIHADIST IN COCKPIT OF GERMANWINGS PLANE ATROCITY? CAN WE EVER KNOW?

Could there be a Jihadist component to this tragedy? In cases like this things are not always totally clear and there are so many vested interests. But Islamic violence does try to make war on the “Infidel” and we know that Islamic Jihadists pay close attention to air transport violence.

What the report from the NYT shows is the utter terror in that plane with the first pilot locked out and hammering on the door. The passengers must have been going totally out of their minds at that point. The tragedy of the situation – imagine if you are a relative and forced to think back on that! The situation is one of complete terror. We cannot tell if there was a Jihadist component here and we may never tell but it is from Islam that all of our terror is coming (thinking of the terror inflicted on Christioan girls in North Nigeria at the hands of Boko Haram and will the Chibook girls ever be found is a big question?) That kind of terror is happening all around us.

The BBC throw doubt on the New York Times article. The NY Times report is a major challenge to all the dhimmies in which BBC occupies centre place. The BBC will try to rubbish the NY Times claims about one in the cockpit. That is what has happened in their latest article and they wheel out their main dhimmi Robert Westcott. He is a long in the tooth dhimmi! The BBC write: “Remi Jouty, director of the French aviation investigative agency, said he hoped investigators would have the “first rough ideas in a matter of days” but the full analysis could take weeks or even months. However, the New York Times quoted an unnamed investigator as saying that one of the pilots – it is not clear if it is the captain or the first officer – left the cockpit and had been unable to get back in. “The guy outside is knocking lightly on the door, and there is no answer,” the investigator said, describing audio from the recorder. “And then he hits the door stronger, and no answer. There is never an answer. You can hear he is trying to smash the door down.” A source close to the investigation gave a similar account to the AFP news agency. An alarm indicating proximity to the ground can be heard before the moment of impact, the source adds. Lufthansa has not named the pilots but it said the co-pilot joined Germanwings in September 2013, directly after training, and had flown 630 hours. Analysis by Richard Westcott, BBC transport correspondent This latest revelation, if true, begins to paint a dramatic picture of the last moments in the cockpit. But there are still plenty of questions to answer. Why did the plane dive? Locked doors don’t make planes crash. Why couldn’t the pilot open the door? There is an emergency procedure that should allow them to get back in. Who was flying? We now know the co-pilot was relatively inexperienced. Was he trying to cope with an emergency on his own? If there really was banging on the door, it might also suggest there was at least air in the cabin, because someone was clearly able to breathe. There had been talk of a depressurisation knocking everyone out. I am surprised such sensitive information has leaked out – again, it’s still not officially confirmed. The rules governing who listens to black boxes are very tight. Only a handful of people are normally allowed into the room when they play the recording back. WE ANSWER THE DHIMMI BBC ALWAYS FULL OF LIES FIRST OF ALL To Remi Jouty and yes of course investigations are thorough and can take much time, as much as is needed. Butthere is a difference between that and secrecy. My conjecture is that such is the righteous consternation in Europe over this atrocity is that there are going to be people inside this investigation who will do the honourable thing and stuff their secrecy. This is what has clearly happened. The report of the first quietly, then hamering and shouting, the horror of that, with passengers worried out of their minds, the plane diving, it is indescribable. That is true. That NY Times report is true and it is going to knock Europe inside out. Pay attention folks! This is it! This is the beginning of the end of the road (if there develops leadership) to dhimmi creps lioke the BBC. So on to Richard Westcott, BBC transport correspondent Westcott seems particularly dense. But it is a particular form of “denseness”. Look at the studied denseness of this dhimmi! And he knows and since he knows he goes actually to the heart of it as far as the dhimmies are concerned. He accuses “Who leaked?” But I realise also he does not live in the real world. In the face of such horror and such cover-up (rememeber we have had Rochdale, Rotherham, Oxford and so much else) some people will come forward., I believe that is what has happened. I bet the NY Times report will prove sound. Nothing will be the same again in Europe. This has got big moment for us all!

PROOF BY THOMAS WICTOR THAT BURNING OF JORDAN PILOT WAS STAGED…PILOT MADE TO BELIEVE HE WOULD LIVE SO HE COOPERATED

Head bowed in submission. Later he was on his knees in submission. Before he had been marched around under direction of a “Director”. Theme of Islamic State in this film production is SUBMISSION…submission to the on high! Most simple explanation is that he was promised he would live if he cooperated. He was shot in the head and flames were added by technology (this technology is really simple and according to Thomas Wictor in this case crudely applied) This explanation is OPPOSITE of conspiracy thought. It offers the SIMPLEST explanation! I fight Holocaust Denial conspiracists like David Icke by seeking the simplest explanation for phenomena.

FELIX QUIGLEY SAYS…This is the only explanation that makes sense about the burning of the Jordan pilot. The whole thing was staged by the Islamic State director (film director…or somebody with some knowledge of same). The question is why he did not fight back fiercely if he knew he was going to be burned alive. He was a military man. He was an Arab man. So why cooperate. That has never been explained until now…so give this a read.

I am very opposed to conspiracy theory. I seek always the simplest solution. And this is the simplest solution as to why the pilot ( brave man by very nature of his profession) did not fight for all he was worth

An extract “The terrorists had a Muslim pilot. They could make a statement about their own fearsomeness, the vulnerability of the aircraft they hate, and the danger of “betraying Islam.” It could be the greatest recruiting tool of all time—as long as the pilot were controlled. A military man, Lieutenant al-Kasasbeh would almost certainly fight if he were told he was going to be burned alive. What would he gain by cooperating?

His life. I believe he cooperated and mimed being burned to death because he was told that he would be spared and kept prisoner. Someone else suggested that he cooperated in exchange for a more merciful death by gunshot. I don’t think that would guarantee his cooperation.

Italian security contractor Fabrizio Quattrocchi was kidnapped in Iraq by al Qaeda. When they took him out on April 14, 2004, to murder him for a propaganda film, he fought, he tried to tear off his hood, and he shouted, “I’ll show you how an Italian dies!” before being shot.

Fabrizio_Quattrocchi

The video of the murder was useless for propaganda purposes.

More recently, a defector from the Islamic State explained why he left the group.

He said he found the courage to attempt an escape after seeing a Kurdish fighter beheaded.

“I decided to risk my life to escape after I witnessed a wounded, captured Kurdish YPG fighter publicly beheaded. He was about my age, but unlike me he was extremely brave,” said Omer.

“He spat on every jihadist around him. He shouted slogans about Kurdish freedom and Abdullah Ocalan. I had never seen anyone so brave in my life. His fingers were cut yet he shouted insults against the jihadists. He was finally beheaded from behind to suffer, and salt was put on his half-cut neck to make him die in agony, but he did not give up until he painfully died,” he said.

Imagine if Lieutenant al-Kasasbeh had fought every attempt to put him in the cage. What if he’d spat and shouted insults? This couldn’t be risked, given that the Islamic State is not likely going to get another pilot anytime soon. Islamic State fighters are sadistic barbarians, but their leaders have rational, long-term plans. That’s why they staged the burning. It was the only way they could be assured that Lieutenant al-Kasasbeh would cooperate.

They wanted him to look penitent as he burned, holding his head in his hands, and they wanted him to sink to his knees in defeat, begging Allah for forgiveness. If they’d drugged him, he wouldn’t have been able to follow the director’s instructions. He had to be motivated, which means they promised him that he would live. Also, if he’d actually been burned alive, he may have toppled the cage in his involuntary death throes. Since they were going to use CGI flames, they needed to have the cage perfectly stationary.”
http://www.thomaswictor.com/why-would-the-islamic-state-fake-the-video/

I CALL ON ALL OF IRELAND AND ISRAEL TO ALSO SUPPORT TOTALLY EL SISI

El Sisi is different. Unlike Netanyahu he is not simply a talker. I will never and can never forgive Netanyahu because he watched Hamas and Islamic Jihad bombs rain down on Sderot for 7 years without acting thus sacificing Jews. El Sisi acted the next morning after the horrific murder of poor Egyptian Copts in Libya by Islamic State savages.

I support el Sisi and call on all of Ireland and Israel to also support el Sisi.

I wrote 3 days ago the following:

“Libya was a relatively settled and prosperous country with many improvements made on the basis of its oil development market by Colonel Gadhafi, who also to his credit had a strong line in assistance to the impoverished Africa and Africans south of Libya
That all came to a shuddering end when NATO, America and leaders like William Hague attacked Libya placing Jihadists in power. The above and much more is the result.
We as a Trotskyist organization said at the time that leaders like Gadhafi had to be defended against the Jihad. There is no if and but. To block the deadly Jihad it is necessary to defend all secular leaders against the Jihad.
This certainly applied to Milosevic, but also much wider, namely the Shah against Khomeini, Gaghbo in Ivory Coast, Ben Ali in Tunisia, Mubarak and now el Sisi in Egypt, Assad and of course Gadhafi
Under Obama, under Cameron, under Sarkozy – we descend into a dark night.

http://4international.me/2015/02/13/libya-under-obama-we-are-descending-into-the-dark-night-of-humanity/

LIBYA – UNDER OBAMA WE ARE DESCENDING INTO THE DARK NIGHT OF HUMANITY

Pictures from the Pamela Geller website interposed by picture of the murder of the American Ambassador.
Libya was a relatively settled and prosperous country with many improvements made on the basis of its oil development market by Colonel Gadhafi, who also to his credit had a strong line in assistance to the impoverished Africa and Africans south of Libya
That all came to a shuddering end when NATO, America and leaders like William Hague attacked Libya placing Jihadists in power. The above and much more is the result.
We as a Trotskyist organization said at the time that leaders like Gadhafi had to be defended against the Jihad. There is no if and but. To block the deadly Jihad it is necessary to defend all secular leaders against the Jihad.
This certainly applied to Milosevic, but also much wider, namely the Shah against Khomeini, Gaghbo in Ivory Coast, Ben Ali in Tunisia, Mubarak and now el Sisi in Egypt, Assad and of course Gadhafi
Under Obama, under Cameron, under Sarkozy – we descend into a dark night.
These corrupt leaders and their bankrupt capitalist system cause enormous sufferings to humanity
Pamela Geller says it all (Pamela banned from Britain by Teresa May!!!) while this happens in the suffering world:
The Muslim fighters of the Islamic State kidnapped a dozen Christians and executed them because they were Christian – but Obama say, the Islamic State is not Islamic. Terror in the White House. Obama armed and aided these savages.
Libya – this is the poison fruit of Obama’s handiwork in that once stable country. Look at the world in 2008 and look at it now. Libya, Mali, Nigeria, Egypt, Syria, Iraq ….. and Obama’s obsession is his hatred for the Jews and the arming and legitimizing of the world’s largest sponsor of terror, Iran.
Why is it the enemedia never questions Obama’s Libya catastrophe? – See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/02/the-islamic-state-kidnaps-and-executes-12-christians-in-libya.html/#sthash.MsselKLi.dpuf

THERE ARE MAJOR EFFORTS BEING MADE TO STOP OUR PEOPLE FROM UNDERSTANDING WHAT ISLAM REALLY IS (IT IS SHEER VIOLENCE)

America, The West, IS At WAR With Islam: What’s To Be Done? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

INDEED, it may appear to this site’s vast readership that there is nothing else to concentrate on, ad infinitum, other than Islam’s incessant barbarism against Israel, America and the west in toto.  

YES, while there are other pressing concerns which are addressed at this site, the fact remains that since Islam IS at war with Israel, America, and nations which refuse to submit to its dictates, concomitantly, these same nations are at war (they should be) with Islam. Agreed?

IN other words, if the definition of survival is the defense of ones personal safety and national security, surely the above paradigm has to be true. As such, doesn’t it make sense that the highest priority is placed on said (worldwide) incendiary area of concern?

SO atop yesterday’s highlighted commentary it was blared: there is a clash of civilizations. Plain and simple. 

BUT it is not enough to just assert a position, sans a concrete evidentiary case. Therefore, the following is more than germane, in order to rip off Islam’s mask!

IN this regard, America’s jihadi cells are primed, and they are ready to blow!

TO wit, once imbibed, how can one not assert:

“We are at War with Islam:  Muslims in America R Unwelcome Guests”

“A Radical Muslim’ is a ‘Practicing Muslim’, a ‘Moderate Muslim’ is a ‘non Practicing Muslim’ or otherwise known as an Apostate of Islam” – by Dave Gaubatz (Islam Exposed: Ask the Expert …ISIS, Islam And Obama: Understanding The Threat To The Free World

By keeping in mind my definition of Practicing and non Practicing Muslims, we should have shown the door to Muslims the day after Sept. 11, 2001.  Sharia law and the U.S. Constitution are not compatible and only one can operate in America.  I pick the U.S. Constitution.

We must stop kidding ourselves about Islam.  This ideology is very dangerous and has no place in this world, especially in America.  How many examples of violence in the name of Islam does it require to convince people Islam and Sharia law go together.  They are one in the same.  Sharia law is the 10 Commandments equivalent of Christianity.  You can no more as a Muslim practice Islam without Sharia law than a Christian could practice Christianity without the 10 Commandments.

It appears to be a simple solution to help prevent Islamic based terrorist attacks in America we should deport ‘all’ Muslims who practice Islam.  We should shutdown all mosques and Islamic centers.  We must close all of the acronyms related to Islam, beginning with CAIR National.

America and Americans have always been a land of friendly people and we have built America by allowing from all over the world migrate to this beautiful country.  From the beginning though we should have insisted all Americans must pledge allegiance to America.  Is this asking too much?

Muslims are taught to show no allegiance to any person, government, or country.  CAIR and ISNA send out brochures informing Muslims to not pledge their allegiance to America.  This should be a hint to senior law enforcement and politicians that trouble may arise from the people who will not show their allegiance to America.

Here are a list of words that mean the opposite of allegiance:

Do any of the opposites to allegiance have even a glimmer of hope that they are good for America?  Of course not.I ask each reader to answer one question.  Do you believe Islam is a healthy, fruitful, peaceful and non violent religion?  Only Obama and Sharpton would argue with you.  Most of you understand Islam is not good for the world.  Why then do we allow it to flourish in America?We allow Islam to flourish because politicians and the media (liberal and conservative) propagandize Islam as a peaceful religion that has been hijacked by radicals.  We have people like Hannity and O’Reilly (Fox News) who should be the voices of truth about Islam, yet each night they continue to broadcast that Islam was founded by a peaceful religious leader (Mohammed) and there are people within Islam (Al Qaeda, ISIS, etc..) who distort the true meaning of Islam and Muslims.  This must stop.Islamic based terrorist events make great news for media outlets.  These outlets spend millions to bring you firsthand information about terror events, but they never attack the basic ideology of Islam.  They will never tell you the Quran and ideology of Islam are the true dangers to our world.  Why will they not tell you the truth?  Because they make many more millions in revenue from broadcasting the terror events, but they understand if they come too close to telling you that Islam is violent and Islam was founded by a child rapist, they would lose sponsors.So the cycle will continue.  Muslims from around the world will continue to murder, rape, and sell innocent children into slavery.  They will continue to bomb our shopping malls, media outlets who begin to tell the truth about Mohammed and Islam, and sadly they will soon be attacking our children at their schools.If you love America and want your children to be safe from Islamic based terrorism committed by Muslims (not radicals), it is time we no longer provide a safe haven in America for practicing Muslims.  Being born in America does not meet the definition of an American.  You must pledge allegiance to this great country or you are no better than the worst of Boko Haram.  We do not need you if you cannot put America’s interest ahead of Prophet Mohammed’s violent ideology.Islam is at war with the world and Americans are at war with Islam.

MIND you, stating the obvious is an unpopular position to stake out. Boo hoo. Regardless, there is no other alternative, when one understands what is at stake. But for some added disinfectant, listen to what Thomas Jefferson had to say, afterwards, we can segue to Winston Churchill’s foresight.

Thomas Jefferson’s response to Muslims in 1801 is more important today than ever. America’s first war with Islamic terrorists should be remembered.

The First Barbary War (1801–1805) also known as the Tripolitan War or the Barbary Coast War, was the first of two wars fought between the United States and the Northwest African Berber Muslim states known collectively as the Barbary States. These were the Ottoman provinces of Tripoli, Algiers, and Tunis, which were enjoying a large autonomy, as well as the independent Sultanate of Morocco. The war was fought because U.S. President Thomas Jefferson refused to pay the high tributes demanded by the Barbary states and because they were seizing American merchant ships and enslaving the crews for high ransoms. It was the first declared war the United States fought on foreign land and seas.

In 1786, Jefferson and John Adams met with Tripoli’s ambassador to Great Britain. They asked this ‘diplomat’ by what right his nation attacked American ships and enslaved her citizens and why the Muslims held such hostility toward this new nation, with which neither Tripoli nor any of the other Barbary Coast nations had any previous contact. The answer was quite revealing. Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja (the ambassador) replied that Islam:

“Was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Qur’an, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”

READERS, as promised, let Winston Churchill’s sage advice ring in your ears:

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity.

The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities – but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.”

As the Liberty Party press release on Weston’s arrest noted, following this portion of his remarks:

“Reportedly a woman came out of the Guildhall and asked Mr Weston if he had the authorisation to make this speech. When he answered that he didn’t, she told him “It’s disgusting!” and then called the police.

Six or seven officers arrived. They talked with the people standing nearby, asking questions about what had happened. The police had a long discussion with Mr Weston, lasting about 40 minutes.

At about 3pm he was arrested. They searched him, put him in a police van and took him away.”

ABSOLUTELY, Europe has gone off the rails. But the question begs asking: is America next?

IN the immortal words of George Santayana, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

BREAKING DOWN THE NATION STATE INDEPENDENCE – THE BREAKING OF ISRAEL IS AT ITS CENTRE

The essence of the New World Order. The above picture shows Serbian youth beheadings by the Clinton Alliance with the Bosnian Islamist Izetbegovic and with the Arab marauders into Yugoslavia. The Serbs suffered greatly, their country destroyed, but the NWO had the Media on its side – totally

This remarkable article from www.wnd.com shows that the New World Order is no conspiracy theory but is a reality.

 

Moreover Islamic State and its total Nazi type destruction is part and parcel of this.  It was thought at one time unthinkable that the Nazis would set out to murder all of the Jews in the world but they indeed did set out to do so. The things that now ISIS is doing a year ago would have been thought impossible or unthinkable. But there is a logic to all of this “impossible to conceive” action.

 

The Nazis were so horrific that afterwards anything was possible. It is the same with this ISIS violence.

 

We enter a new stage in the disintegration of the capitalist system which drives now towards barbarity as stock market crash is being forecast even on WND aside posts.

 

Consider the general drift and one thing becomes obvious (if the wage slaves have the time or energy to stop and think). The nation state barriers are being broken down as the Empire makes war on nation.

 

It was Yugoslavia which was destroyed in the 90s. Many Serbs today are rotting in Hague jails as Jonathon Pollard rots in an American prison.

 

The intervention in Afghanistan destroyed that country. The removal of Saddam was the most important attack of Empire along the line to the New World Order. With Saddam gone there was no block to the Jihadist forces.

 

Then it was in this order with carefully staged strategy – Ben Ali of Tunisia, Gaghbo, Mubarak, Gadhafi and the attention switched quickly to Syria. The Egyptians fought back so valiantly against the Obama/Muslim Brotherhood alliance and that is still unresolved because Obama has not given up on the destruction of Egypt.

 

All this time you will notice world Antisemitism grows and Israel (which is the heart of the nation state concept) is enfeebled by a terrible set of leaders WHO WILL NEVER ACT.

 

Now the US turns even more on North Korea. To top it all Obama is in close alliance with all sections of Jihad and above all with Iran, the genocidal against Jews Iran and the Gay Hanging Iran!

 

 

 

(see http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/obamas-globalist-treachery-and-its-gop-enablers/)

The 114th Congress will be sworn in next week, and the media campaign for President Obama’s next power grab is already under way.

 

The New York Times, Washington Post and Politico (Tiger Beat on the Potomac) are all telling us the GOP Congress is ready to surrender its oversight responsibilities and grant extraordinary new powers to Obama under the rubric of fast track “trade promotion authority.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is the fulfillment of a plan at least six decades in the making.

 

Fast track would empower Obama to secretly negotiate the TransPacific Partnership and a TransAtlantic global governance agreement and sign them before showing them to Congress. When Obama does send them to the Hill, he would bypass committee hearings, dictate limited debate and outlaw any amendments or filibusters.

 

While these are labeled as “free trade” agreements, they are in fact a blueprint for international governance that kills American sovereignty and overrides the Constitution. Secretary of State John Kerry admits their purpose is to merge the U.S. economy with other nations, and a White House insider describes them as “the most important institutions that the president will leave as a legacy.” Not to be outdone, Vice President Joe Biden explicitly stated that the TransPacific Partnership fulfills the Obama administration’s vision for a new world order.

 

The TransPacific Partnership and its kin are the next step in a project conceived decades ago and pursued under both Democratic and Republican administrations. Their goal is to render independent nations null and void, and hand power over to unaccountable, transnational corporatist authorities.

 

This may sound like a plot lifted from a Bond super-villain, but it was in fact detailed at a congressional hearing in 1967.

 

George Ball, a globalist of the first order who kept himself busy on Wall Street when he wasn’t undersecretary of state for presidents Kennedy and Johnson, appeared with David Rockefeller at a hearing entitled “The Future of U.S. Foreign Trade Policy” before the Congressional Joint Economic Committee in 1967. They laid out a vision of a corporatist New World Order that did away with outdated “individual national governments.”

 

Let’s go to the Congressional Record transcript of the hearing. George Ball’s testimony speaks for itself. [Emphasis added]

 

“Today, a corporate management in Detroit or New York or Dusseldorf or London may decide that it can best serve the market of country Z by combining the resources of country X with labor and plan facilities in country Y – and it may alter that decision six months from now if changes occur in costs or prices or transport. … But to fulfill its full potential, the multinational corporation must be able to operate with little regard for national boundaries – or, in other words, for restrictions imposed by individual national governments.

 

“To achieve such a free trading environment we must do far more than merely reduce or eliminate tariffs. …

 

“Implied in this, of course, is a considerable erosion of the rigid concepts of national sovereignty, but that erosion is taking place every day … and I think it desirable that this process be consciously continued. … [M]odern business – sustained and reinforced by modern technology – has outgrown the constrictive limits of the antiquated political structures in which most of the world is organized, … the present crazy quilt of small national states … [C]ommercial, monetary, and antitrust policies – and even the domiciliary supervision of earth-straddling corporations – will have to be increasingly entrusted to supranational institutions. …

 

“[B]usiness decisions are frustrated by a multiplicity of different restrictions by relatively small nation states that are based on parochial considerations, reflect no common philosophy, and are keyed to no common goal.”

 

After dismissing the notion that governments represent the interests of their citizens as “parochial considerations,” Ball went on to say the European Union, then known as the Common Market, provided the roadmap to the borderless world he dreamed of. In fact, the EU shows us the “economic integration” now envisioned for the U.S. made the sovereign nations of Europe merely empty flags to be waved at soccer matches, with crucial decision-making powers stripped from national parliaments and vested in transnational institutions unaccountable to citizens.

 

David Rockefeller, the High Priest of the Eastern Establishment, followed George Ball and echoed his sentiments before the congressional panel.

 

Rockefeller made the case for merging North American economies in a North American Union and, at the prompting of a congressman named Donald Rumsfeld, advocated giving the president fast track negotiating power so Congress couldn’t get in the way of implementing his globalist plan.

 

(You can read the testimony yourself in the Congressional Record from 1967. Testimony by George Ball and David Rockefeller begins on page 271 of the pdf.)

 

You will find everything Ball and Rockefeller called for in the TransPacific Partnership and on the agenda of the new GOP-controlled Congress. Sen. Mitch McConnell has said he will work with the White House to give Obama so-called fast track trade promotion authority to enact the TransPacific Partnership and its evil twin, the TransAtlantic Trade and Investment Partnership.

 

These Obamatrade agreements are not about “free trade” – they are about creating international regulatory institutions whose diktat trumps the U.S. Congress, the Constitution and even the Supreme Court.

 

Why would anyone sworn to uphold the Constitution give President Obama the fast track power he and David Rockefeller want him to have?

 

And why would Republicans, elected on the promise to reign in an out-of-control president, choose to give him even more power?

 

Contact Congress and tell them to vote No on fast track for the TransPacific Partnership.

CAN THE WORLD STAND BY AND DO NOTHING AS HISTORICAL HERITAGE IS DESTROYED?

This is a terrific post which has great information about Islam and while there are a few things I would question, as a whole it is totally worthwhile to read and to store as a reference in future discussions:

The Destruction of the Middle East

By Denis MacEoin, GATESTONE INSTITUTE

We are living through ferocious times. Stories about the self-proclaimed Islamic State [ISIS/ISIL/Da’esh] abound in the media, in what has now become a daily round of beheadings, suicide bombings, and general mayhem from Nigeria to Malaysia. It seems that wherever there is a Muslim country, there is extreme violence. But one part of the Islamic State narrative has received less attention than the gruesome rounds of killings: the continuing onslaughts on cities such as Mosul, Aleppo, Raqqa and Kobani. The Islamic State and related movements have rampaged across parts of Iraq and Syria, destroying the entire heritage of ancient regions, demolishing historic churches, synagogues, mosques, Sufi and Shi’i shrines, and major archaeological sites. All this vandalism is driven by a relentless passion to enforce religious purity on the regions they now control.

Around the world, art historians, antiquities experts, and archaeologists scarcely dare open their e-mails every day, fearing loss of another irreplaceable site. Physical destruction in the Islamic realms has now reached proportions of the Mongol invasions of the thirteenth centuryosul, the Islamic State set out on an operation of “cultural and historical cleansing” across the city. The group deploys a unit called the Kata’ib Taswiyya, or settlement battalions, who are ordered to identify sites for culling. The unit razes to the ground any mosques, churches or, invariably, shrines that have been built over tombs; such places may attract devotees to pray in them, thereby creating polytheism — in Islam one of the crimes most censured. In addition, the painting or sculpting of the human form is anathema; if man was created in God’s image, to represent man is to presume to know God and therefore to diminish Him.

Graveyards are flattened, headstones are bulldozed, and statues of cultural significance to the people of Mosul are destroyed.

As we face the Islamic State and all the rapidly expanding jihadist movements in the Middle East and beyond, we are starting to recognize that airstrikes have only limited results. If we are to contain or defeat the adversaries in our midst, we have to understand their motivation, their psychology, and their sense of rootedness.

Politicians who proclaim that Islam is a religion of peace do us a disservice; Islam has never been at peace with the world around it. The Islamic State’s behavior is solidly rooted in Islamic ideology, law and practice. Only when this fundamental fact is grasped will we be able to address what confronts us. It is time that not only active jihadists, but their ideological sponsors in Salafi, Wahhabi, Mawdudist, and other classical and modern interpretations of Islam, be discussed openly before they do more harm. They and we do not have the leisure to wait until the oil money runs out and leaves the Saudis or Qataris weak.

 We must learn to speak the truth, especially in high places. In the tenth century, Islam abandoned reason and rational pursuits in favor of revelation and revealed law that could not be challenged. Ethics were defined by what Allah said was good or evil in Sharia law. Islam has remained frozen ever since. We cannot go on patronizing this, and nodding acceptance that Muslims know best. Very few grasp the quandary in which non-extremist Muslims, like their ancestors, are captured. Western rationalism, Western ethics, and Western standards of peace and justice need to remain, or the world we know could be trampled underfoot by men and women who prefer death to co-existence, and fundamentalism to tolerance.

There are many wise and sensible Muslims who favour a shift to a more updated way of thinking. Many cannot openly declare their thoughts for fear of reprisals and even execution; others are faithful Muslims who see a desperate need for a valid reinterpretation of their religion.

Today, such Muslims use the freedoms bestowed on them in the West to write, network, and debate their thoughts about the fundamentalist interpretation of Islam by the Islamic State, other Salafis, Wahhabis, Mawdudists, and all other clerics and extremist supporters of murder and destruction. It is their mosques and shrines and ancient monuments that are being crushed; it is their heritage — as much as that of Jews, Christians, Yazidis and Baha’is — that is being wiped from the pages of history.

Losses so far include:

  • The statues of Mulla ‘Uthman al-Mawsili (1845-1923), a famous musician and poet, of a woman carrying an urn, and of Abu Tammam (788-845), author of the celebratedHamasa, one of the greatest literary compilations ever made in Arabic.
  • The destruction of the greatly venerated tomb of ‘Ali ibn al-Athir al-Jazari (1160-1233), a major landmark that had stood in the centre of Mosul for centuries. Ibn al-Athir is celebrated as the author of The Complete History, one of the most important histories of Islam ever written.
  • The Islamic State’s destruction of the Tomb of Yunus (Jonah) Mosque, which was blown to pieces along with all its contents. Even before the explosion, fighters took sledgehammers to ancient tombstones in the building. The mosque was of importance not just to the Muslims of the city, but as a place of pilgrimage for Jews and Christians. St. George’s Monastery church, one of the oldest in the region, has also gone forever.
  • In Kirkuk, the Islamic State has destroyed the tomb of the Prophet Daniel, and in Nineveh, the ancient ruins of which lie across the River Tigris from Mosul, sprawl damaged archaeological ruins.
  • In Mosul, the 13th-century shrine of Imam Awn al-Din — with a stunning vaulted ceiling, designed to resemble a honeycomb, inside a pyramid-shaped tower on the banks of the Tigris, and among the city’s most precious sites — was one of the very few structures to have survived the devastation of the 13th-century Mongol invasion On July 25, 2014, members of the Islamic State reduced it to rubble.
  • In Tikrit, the city’s most famous and most beautiful church of St. Ahoadamah, known as the Green Church, dating from the 7th century, has been erased from history.
  • In Syria, the Jabhat al-Nusra’s destruction of the Deir el-Zour Armenian Church, that stood as a memorial to the 1.5 million slaughtered in the Armenian genocide in Turkey, was blown up.
  • In Mali, much of UNESCO’s World Heritage Site of Timbuktu (Mali) was destroyed during the battles of Gao and Timbuktu, fought between the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad and the Islamist Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa between June 26 and 27, 2012. Afterwards, the Islamist group Ansar Dine went on a rampage identical to that of the Islamic State. An official for the group, Abou Dardar, boasted that “not a single mausoleum will remain in Timbuktu.”
  • Sufi shrines have been pulverized in Egypt, Libya, Mali, Pakistan, Iran, Somalia, Sudan, Tunisia, Morocco, India, and the Balkans.
  • In Bahrain, 43 Shi’i mosques and tens of other religious structures have been destroyed and damaged by the ruling Sunni government there.
  • Across Syria and Iraq, ancient archaeological sites have been wrecked. They were not just the heritage of those countries, they were central to our understanding of the ancient world, where human civilization first developed in city-states. Apamea, with its famous colonnade and beautiful mosaic, capital of the Seleucid empire, was a major center of Roman rule in the Levant, a leading city in Byzantine Syria, and at one time among the best-preserved archaeological sites in the region. Today, it looks like the face of the moon. Its devastation, the work of demolition done by looters using heavy earth-moving machines, took a mere four or five months.
  • In eastern Syria, one of the world’s richest archaeological remains, Dura-Europos, the “Pompeii of the Syrian Desert,” was obliterated. Remarkable finds had been brought to light: temples, wall decorations, inscriptions, military equipment, and tombs. It had been home to a third-century painted synagogue as well as to the oldest example in the world of a Christian house-church, which contained the earliest depictions of Jesus Christ ever found, dating back to 235 AD. The Islamic State looted the site and, as elsewhere, has apparently sold its treasure on the black market of the antiquities trade, presumably using the proceeds to inflate their already swollen coffers for the promotion of jihad.
  • Both Shi’i and Sufi shrines and mosques have fallen afoul of the Islamic State’s fanaticism. Jewish sites have been targeted so extensively that UNESCO has held aspecial session on threats posed to them. UNESCO’s Director-General Irina Bokova has described the Islamic State’s activities in this respect as “a form of cultural cleansing.” Many other Jewish sites were also destroyed or under threat from Islamist entities in Libya, where an ancient Jewish heritage was all but wiped out under the regime of Mu’ammar Qadhafi, and where what is left is succumbing to fresh attacks.

Locals survey the hill of rubble that resulted from the destruction of the Tomb of Yunus (Jonah), in Mosul, Iraq. The Islamic State blew up the tomb and mosque on July 24, 2014.

The Islamic State, however, does not restrict its demolition to Christian, Jewish or pagan sites. Its members have also evidently culled what may be thought of as their own heritage. In Tikrit, they demolished the country’s oldest Islamic site, the Arba’in (Forty) Shrine and mosque, where forty of the companions (Salaf) of the Prophet were buried.

In this, there is desperate irony, for the form of Islam followed by the Islamic State is Salafism, based on imitating the ways of Muhammad and his companions.

The heritage of centuries has been wiped out in little more than a year. There will be many who argue that this devastation is, at root, the fault of the West; that its colonization, imperial ambitions, and general interference have forced the people of the Middle East to rise up against Europe and America, and find their only solution in the creation of an Islamic state where Shari’a law will dominate and justice prevail. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Syria was never a French colony, but a mandate territory between 1922 and 1936 — fourteen years. Lebanon was a mandate territory from 1922 to 1943 — twenty-one years. Iraq was a British mandate from 1922 to 1932 — ten years. All were colonies of the Muslim Ottoman empire for centuries: Iraq between 1543 and 1918, Syria from 1516 to 1918, and were, before that, colonies of earlier Islamic empires from the Umayyads to the Abbasids to the Mamluks — and so on.

This alone exposes the reality, that the actions of groups such as the Islamic State have their true roots in Islam itself. The Prophet and his companions fought jihad wars and destroyed pagan idols as well as places they may have been concerned would become centers for cults. During the Arab conquests, many religious centers were destroyed, notably in India, where temples were looted and razed, and whole towns ruined by the Ghaznavids and Timurids.

Eventually the need to wipe out all traces of unbelief became more or less obsessive. At one time, for instance, Egyptian law demanded that any house found to contain a copy of The Apology of al-Kindi (a book containing a polemical dialogue between a Muslim and a Christian) would be demolished, along with forty houses around it.[1]

In more recent times, in 1802, during the first of the three Saudi states, Wahhabi armies attacked the major Shi’i religious town of Karbala in Ottoman Iraq, where they killed 5,000 inhabitants and destroyed the shrines of Muhammad’s son-in-law ‘Ali (the first Shi’i imam and the fourth Sunni caliph) and his son Husayn, the prophet’s grandson. The following year, Wahhabi forces under the leadership of the first Saudi ruler, ‘Abd al-‘Aziz, entered Mecca, where they destroyed tombs and shrines, and in the process, removed much of the city’s history — as is being repeated today in Mecca and Medina.

Between 1913 and 1927, extremist Wahhabi forces, known as the Ikhwan, rampaged through the Arabian peninsula, much as members of the Islamic State do now, killing and destroying anyone and anything they deem contrary to the Puritanism of their creed, which extremists interpret as preaching the annihilation of all that is not Islam.

Today, the Mecca and Medina of the first and second centuries of the Islamic faith have been all but wrecked, not by the Islamic State or any other radical entity, but by the Wahhabi Saudi government. Over the past two decades, major historical sites in Mecca and Medina, all related to the lifetime of the Prophet and shortly after, have been destroyed or disfigured to the point where neither city is recognizable save for the Ka’ba and the Grand Mosque in Mecca, and the Prophet’s Mosque in Medina.

Although much has been done to accommodate the increasing millions of pilgrims who go there for the hajj pilgrimage, most of the demolition appears to relate to a Wahhabi and Salafi fear that pilgrims may pray at the graves of Muhammad’s companions, at the house where he was born, or at other buildings associated with the first era of Islam. There seems to be an insistence that anything that might compromise God’s oneness must be eradicated, and this concern may have prompted the country’s rulers to destroy them.

The vast Jannat al-Baqi cemetery, which holds so many remains of Muhammad’s family, close companions and the earliest Muslim saints, has been levelled, and all domes and mausoleums turned to dust. That act followed earlier levelings by Wahhabis in 1206 and the Ikhwan in 1925. Those included the graves of the martyrs of the Battle of Uhud and that of Hamza, the prophet’s uncle and most beloved supporter. So too the Mosque of Fatima (Muhammad’s daughter), the Mosque of the Manaratayn (the twin minarets), and the cupola that marked the burial place of the prophet’s incisor tooth.

In Medina as well, the home of Muhammad’s Ethiopian wife, Maryam, where his son Ibrahim was born, has been paved over.

In Mecca, the house of his first wife, Khadija, the first person to whom he divulged his mission, has been turned into public toilets. In 1998, the grave of the prophet’s mother, Amina bint Wahb, was bulldozed in Abwa, after which gasoline was poured on it. There is much more.[2]

Destruction of the sacred places of rival faiths or denominations is nothing new; it has happened throughout history. Henry VIII wrecked Catholic abbeys and monasteries; their ruins still pepper the English countryside. The destruction of the Babri Mosque in Ayodhya by Hindus in 1992 led to two thousand deaths. The Roman demolition of Judaism’s Second Temple marks a watershed in world history and is central to the current conflict in the Holy Land. But the most consistent use of elimination through the centuries has been the Muslim war on non-Muslims. Despite much controversy, it has been claimed that over 2000 Hindu, Jain and Buddhist temples and holy places were destroyed by Muslim conquerors in India. Churches and synagogues have been demolished or converted into mosques in many places.

When Jordan controlled East Jerusalem between 1948 and 1967, all but one of the Old City’s synagogues was reduced to rubble or converted into stables and chicken coops; the main Jewish cemetery was desecrated, and Jewish homes destroyed.

Today, in Iran, the Islamic regime has demolished all the holy sites and graveyards of an indigenous faith, the Baha’i religion.

If the depredations of the Islamic State are to have any meaning in the end, perhaps it will be because they will have shown how right the non-extremist Muslims are in calling for a deep change within Islam.

Dr. Denis MacEoin, based in Newcastle-upon-Tyne, is a lecturer in Arabic and Islamic Studies and a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Gatestone Institute.


[1] Robert Reilly, The Closing of the Muslim Mind, Wilmington, 2010, p. 36.

[2] Websites where readers can read of these destructions at length include: Irfan Ahmed, “The Destruction of the Holy Sites in Mecca and Medina,” Islamica Magazine; Laith Abou-Ragheb, “Dr. Sami Angawi on Wahhabi Desecration of Mecca: Developers and Purists Erase Mecca’s History,” Center for Islamic Pluralism/Reuters, 12 July 2005; Ziauddin Sardar, ” The Destruction of Mecca,” The New York Times, 30 September 2014; Carla Power, “Saudi Arabia Bulldozes Over Its Heritage,” Time, 14 November, 2014; Jerome Taylor, “Medina: Saudis take a bulldozer to Islam’s history,” The Independent, 26 October 2012; Jerome Taylor, “The photos Saudi Arabia doesn’t want seen – and proof Islam’s most holy relics are being demolished in Mecca,”The Independent, 11 December 2014.

AS A TROTSKYIST I AM TOTALLY OPPOSED TO THE CONSPIRACY CRAZIES AND WHY THIS IS

Adina Kutnicki…excellent article by Adina on the role of the Israeli Government of Netanyahu in all of these affairs with Obama and American and NATO Imperialism is attacked by Israpundit regular commenter (url below) Bernard Ross. We will follow it. These pictures, a couple out of thousands, are strongly remindful of the Jihad against Bosnian and Yugoslavian Serbian Christians, a Jihad backed to the hilt by US and NATO, especially Clinton and Blair

Conspiracy thinking is not really thinking at all. It is the poison which eats at the heart of critical thought and real knowledge and learning. It is based on subjective idealism which can be defined as separating the ideas in people’s minds from the real world. The idea comes first, “In the beginning was the Word” that sort of thing.

Therefore I would advise people to begin to follow a debate which is now breaking out on the Israpundit website, that is http://www.israpundit.org/archives/63603324/comment-page-1#comment-63356000147623 and where I have thrown down the gauntlet to a noted conspiracy theorist calling himself Bernard Ross.

My challenge to B Ross who seems to be suggesting that Islamic State is some kind of conspiracy project (and which leads him to attack a very important writer who appears regularly on Martin DSherman Facebook is to begin with the following: (But warning do not expect a sensible answer to my question. I expect evasion and most like abuse)

 

 

B Ross writes:

 

 

You know I have never bought the story of the gulf arabs against (sic) IS (LOL) just like I never bought the GCC qatar split…. a shell game.

 

Can you elaborate on this?

 

Also you seem to be suggesting that Islamic State is a creation of the US and NATO.

 

But can you define what you think the Islamic State is then and if you disagree with the take on the Islamic State by people like Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller?

 

 

And while Muslims by the tens and even hundreds of thousands will march against a YouTube video, a Danish cartoon, the Jewish state, and perceived insults to Islam, they stay silent in the face of the most egregious Islamic supremacist violence. Silence is sanction. Why are they silent? Because it is sanctioned, commanded in the Quran and those who speak against it don’t have a theological leg to stand on.

 (shown is a picture) christianA woman walks inside a damaged church in Maaloula. The Christian town was attacked last spring by extremist forces. (REUTERS/Omar Sanadiki) – See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2014/12/the-islamic-state-isis-turning-churches-into-torture-chambers-selling-christian-artifacts.html/#sthash.ABJulc3q.dpuf

ISRAEL AND EGYPT (EL SISI) MUST FORM A CLOSE AND UNITED FRONT AGAINST HAMAS AND THE PA

I have been campaigning on my blog http://www.4international.me on the need for Israel to be united with El Sisi against Hamas and The Muslim Brotherhood. It is vital that this is done out in the open. That it is not in any way under the table out of fear of upsetting Obama and the EU Antisemites. It is precisely to challenge Obama and the EU Antisemites that this is done out in the open, a clear advance to El Sisi, to offer el Sisi total support and defence against Obama and the EU Antisemites, without any abiguity. On the basis that el Sisi represents a secular forcé (relatively speaking) in Egypt as opposed to the very dangerous and Fascist Muslim Brotherhood.

In calling for this I have not really got any illusions in the present clique who rule in Israel, whoever they are. At present it is Netanyahu. Netanyahu made no call whatsoever to defend Mubarak, nor did he make a call to defend Gadhafi, which was absolutely vital to do.

This is the essence of the United Front as proposed by Lenin and Leon Trotsky, in slightly different historical situations and conditions it is true, but the basic principles remain the same. Belman wrote back to me saying he wanted nothing to do with “Communism”. But the principles of the United Front Belman remained totally ignorant of. He closed his mind and learned nothing. An Alliance with el Sisi does not imply for one second that Israel should surrender its Independence or its right to be critical of el Sisi on any issue. The United Front Belman could ever grasp means the opposite. It is a strengthening of Independence.

WOMAN BEHEADED AS BRITAIN DESCENDS INTO BARBARISM … DOOMED SOCIETY

“When you meet the unbelievers, strike the necks…” (Qur’an 47:4)

“When you gonna wake up, and strengthen the things that remain?” (Bob Dylan, echoing Revelation 3:2)

This is denial and willful ignorance on a scale so massive as to spell nothing less than a doomed society.

“Woman beheaded ‘with machete’ in north London garden,” by Tom Whitehead, Ed Malnick, Tom Brooks Pollock and Gordon Rayner, the Telegraph, September 4, 2014 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

An 82-year-old woman was beheaded in a north London garden after a crazed attacker went beserk with a machete.

Pensioner Palmira Silva was decapitated at her house in Edmonton in broad daylight in an apparent frenzied assault by a 25-year-old man who randomly targeted victims.

The horror scene unfolded as terrified eye witnesses saw the man, who was wielding a foot long blade, attack a passing vehicle and a cat before roaming back gardens for a victim.

Police believe the man also tried to attack two people at another address in Nightingale Road but they were able to escape without injury.

The man was arrested after armed police, who had distracted him to avoid other attacks, cornered him in a house and Tasered him, during which some officers were injured.

Ms Silva was pronounced dead at the scene.

One line of inquiry for detectives is now understood to be whether the man had been inspired by recent footage of the Isil beheadings of two US journalists in Syria.

Locals last night claimed the arrested man had converted to Islam last year.

However, detectives said they had ruled out terrorism as a motive for the killing.

On what grounds? Why, denial and willful ignorance, of course.

Eye witnesses described a dramatic operation by police called to the scene in which officers were smashing windows of neighbouring properties lift screaming children and terrified residents to safety.

One neighbour told of her narrow escape and that she believed the attacker was a local man.

Catering worker Freda Odame, 30, said she heard a commotion and pulled back her curtains and saw a black man aged in his mid 20s.

“Someone was shouting and the door was banging. I could hear the screaming but I could not hear what he was saying,” she said.

“I could see that he had a big curved knife, about the size of an arm’s length and he was crouching as if frantically searching for something.

“He had a crazed look in his eyes so I closed my curtains because I was scared. My next door neighbour was in his garden but did not seem to realise anything was going on.

“I have seen him around here all the time, I think he lives on the road, He has a grey car and I think he lives with his family.

“I was just so very scared. Five minutes after I heard him screaming the police knocked on my door and told me I had to get out.”

Neighbour Sue Mahadooa, 50, who saw police cars screech to a halt outside her home, said officers were running down the street shouting at people to get out of their homes.

Officers with battering rams began breaking down front doors and smashing windows to help neighbours to safety, unaware of which property the killer was in.

Ms Mahadooa said the house at which it is believed the woman was killed in the back garden is split into three maisonettes and police were desperate to get residents out of the flats without sending them into the corridor of the property.

“These officers ran up and started trying to help these two children and a woman out of the little top window of the ground floor,” she said.

“The woman couldn’t get through the window so they started smashing the bigger one, but then I saw them get her out of the front door.

“She was very frightened. The kids were crying and looked very scared. There was clearly something awful going on inside the house.”

George Stylianou said: “Policewomen were sprinting past us and screaming at us ‘get back – you don’t understand how dangerous this man is.’

“Then we saw that policemen were running along the road dragging women and children out of windows – they had to smash windows to drag women out.”

Ahmed Yusuf, 19, said: “At first there were two police cars, then all of a sudden there were 20.

“The police said to drop everything. I said ‘What’s going on?’ and they said there’s a guy jumping over gardens.”

Earlier one witness had Tweeted: “Madman on the loose with a machete in Edmonton”.

Edmonton MP Andy Love said: “I am absolutely horrified and stunned by what has happened in my constituency.

“This is a relatively solid community with relatively good relations between all of the people living there. It comes as a shock that it has happened.

Mini cab driver Ricardo Kwiek, 23, told of how he saw a young man fighting with police before being bundled into a van.

“There were policemen trying the front door and the back. The chap inside wasn’t letting them in,” he said.

“They got in the back door. They came out with a man who was struggling and fighting.

“He wasn’t giving up. I could see loads of police fighting with him. They all piled on top of him and arrested him.

Metropolitan Police Commander Simon Letchford said: “Officers who attended the scene evacuated a number of those people from those premises to make them safe.

“During that period they distracted the man from carrying out any further attacks.”

He said his officers had done “everything they could to evacuate people from those premises and that clearly they were aware of what had happened and they put themselves in extreme danger to protect the public, to ensure that his behaviour was stopped as soon as it possibly could be”.

DCI John Sandlin, who is leading this investigation, said: “This is was a highly visible attack in broad daylight on a residential street. I can understand why this may cause people concern, however we are confident that we are not looking for anyone else at this stage.

“Whilst it is too early to speculate on what the motive behind this attack was I am confident, based on the information currently available to me, that it is not terrorist related.”

The arrested man was being treated for minor injuries suffered during his apprehension.

A HUGE MOSQUE CAPACITY 10,000 DOMINATES THE SCENE IN MERTON LONDON

This is an extract from the Daily Mail. Mass immigration into Britain has created a totally politically correct and utterly crushed society. Any person who speaks against the dangers of mass immigration into a country, and ilegal at that, is labelled a “racist”. The Stalinists and the Revisionists of Marxism of the British Left have been totally instrumental in creating such a climate.

(start extract here)

On Saturday, the leading liberal commentator David Goodhart described the profound effect mass immigration has had on social cohesion. He admitted that, for decades, liberals like him failed to realise its implications. Today, concluding his series, he sets out his vision of how a new Britishness can bind the nation’s fractured communities.

Large-scale immigration has created an England that is increasingly full of mysterious and unfamiliar worlds — as I discovered one day sitting in an enormous minareted mosque in a sedate London suburb among thousands of men in Pashtun dress listening to the words of an elderly man.

Mirza Masroor Ahmad is not any old preacher. To a couple of million Muslims of one particular sect, the Ahmadiyans, he is the holiest man on the planet.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2298553/A-mega-mosque-suburb-90-cent-white-30-years-ago-polite-apartheid-dividing-Britain.html

The Daily Mail is part of the British Ruling Class and it begins to understand the horror that has been created. There really is hardly a British working class left any more because it does not have any conscious leadership.

The Stalinists of the Communist Party liquidated Marxism and became a politically correct versión of a local council bureaucracy in each área.

The article, please read it all, shows that there is a 10,000 capacity Mosque build which dominates Merton, a part of London, and there are hardly any native British people left at all.

Those that are left, and if they have a job with the local council of Merton, will be making dammed sure they keep their heads well down. Any mention that there are hardly any British left in Merton and they will be sacked. My point here is that the trade unions would go along with that sacking.

This situation was reflected in the ex EDL Tommy Robinson is in jail on a trumped up charge and furthermore we have learned that the EDL big mouths never even bothered to provide Robinson and his family with a guard, because his and his family were continually threatened by Islam Fascists.

This man David Goodhart who has written a book is a total pain in the butt. He thinks there is going to be a new national consciousness arising from this ruptured society which will meld all these groups into one great British nation.

It already exists and is called hatred of the British native person

The Mosque has replaced Express Dairies which once employed 300 local people

The Mosque dominates the whole área. THAT is the new British consciousness.

IMAGINE, BY GOLDIN, HAS POLICE AGENT BILL AYERS FEATURING AS A SOCIALIST

This is why we need 4international. It is partly to help expose the lies of the capitalist class. Of course Imperialists and Capitalists will bring forward this book. The whole book is a lie and it has nothing at all to do with socialism.

Name of the book is

Francis Goldin, Debby Smith and Michael Steven Smith, eds., Imagine Living in a Socialist USA, (New York: Harper Perennial, 2014) 304 pp., $15.99

This is a description on Amazon

“Imagine: Living in a Socialist U.S.A. is an anthology of original essays that looks at what the United States could be if the capitalism collapsed and socialism was instated.

The book paints a portrait of the many facets of life in a socialist society through a series of ruminations by prominent thinkers, activists, and artists, including Academy Award-winning filmmaker Michael Moore’s proposal for how to effectively continue the Occupy Wall Street movement; incarcerated journalist Mumia Abu-Jamal’s look at alternative systems to capitalist injustice; Hugo Award-winning author Terry Bisson’s short story imagining Thanksgiving in 2077 where the dinner table conversation revolves around everything from the rising seas in Florida and the dismantling of the Alaskan pipeline to the children’s ability to work off their student loans through civil service; New York Daily News columnist Juan Gonzalez’s argument that immigrant workers have already proven that socialism provides a better life; and attorney Michael Ratner, who is representing Julian Assange and WikiLeaks in the United States, explaining the steps he would take as attorney general, which include refusing to enforce criminal prosecution of undocumented immigrants and Internet activists like Assange, as well as ending all FBI surveillance measures.

Other essays touch on the topics of gender equality in the workplace, an end to the war on drugs, how the arts and education would thrive in a socialist system, and, above all, make a case for how and why a socialist U.S.A could lead to a better world. ”

THE RULING CLASS LOVE THIS BOOK. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SOCIALISM

Radosh on Frontpagemag has this

“This dreadful book has one redeeming quality: it admits candidly what the Left in America really wants when it says that its goal is a socialist country. Meant to be a recruiting tool as well as a morale booster for the Left, this book leads to a very different conclusion than its editors and authors intend.

Karl Marx, who, aside from that one famous sentence that when the communist golden age was finally reached, men would hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon and relax at night, never wrote anything about how the communist future would actually work or what it would look like. The editors of Imagine, on the other hand, have tried for a book that paints an explicit portrait of the utopian future they are sure is just around the corner. They’ve recruited the usual suspects to help them out: including Bill Ayers, Michael Moore, Michael Ratner, Blanche Wiesen Cook, Frances Fox Piven, Mumia Abu-Jumal, Angela Davis, Juan Gonzalez and Leslie Cagan, among many others.

They love this book the capitalist and imperialists. Jared Israel in a terrific showed that Bill Ayers is a pólice agent and remains so

THE MAIN FACT IS THAT PUTIN AND RUSSIA ARE DEFENDING THEMSELVES FROM NATO

Let us try to get some decent factual knowledge about Ukraine and Crimea.

First of all Leon Trotsky who is the essence along with Lenin of Russian Communism fought for Ukrainian Independence at the same time as he advocated Jewish Independence in a Jewish State in Palestine (in the thirties)

But not a Ukraine that would be a base for war against Russia. Trotsky had fought to defend Russia from just this in the Civil War period of 1918 to 1921. Every nation in the world has the right to defend itself as Israel did by knocking out the enemy war`planes in 67

The following is a useful article. it is useful factually which is what we want here on 4international. I think it has a fallacy when it talks about Kosovo.

This Washington Post writer and quoting The Guardian has a direct, total and complete lie. Let me quote this lie

“In The Guardian newspaper, Daniel Drezner has pointed out that NATO only intervened in Kosovo in 1999 after significant evidence of Serbian abuses was collected”

Those were lies. Those were NATO lies. it was the very opposite to this. NATO moved in with its power and behind NATO was the KLA ethnic cleansers.

Those lies persist and will persist until revolutionary power and action drives these lies out of circulation.

This is not a parallel but is the very opposite of Crimea. In Kosovo the majority of the people were Serb and then these Serb people were driven out of Kosovo by Jihad and replaced by Albanian Muslims. So the takeover of Kosovo by NATO/Jihad was a continuous war on Serbia and Serbs. Read the history of Crimea it has always been Russian. Why did Kruschev hand Crimea to Ukraine? Understand Kruschev and understand Stalinism.

(start extract from article here)

The collapse of the USS.R. has always been a bugbear for Putin: Not so much because he loved Communism, but because it seemed to mark the end of Russia’s time as a great power at the center of an empire.

In his speech, the Russian president returned to his anger over the end of the Soviet era. “Millions of people went to bed in one country and awoke in different ones,” he said, “overnight becoming ethnic minorities in former union republics, while the Russian nation became one of the biggest, if not the biggest, ethnic group in the world to be divided by borders.”

The situation, he said, was especially significant in Crimea, which became part of Ukraine in 1954 at the “personal initiative” of Communist Party head Nikita Khrushchev. “It was only when Crimea ended up as part of a different country that Russia realised that it was not simply robbed, it was plundered,” Putin said.

Putin’s theory on Crimea’s place in Russian history makes some sense: The peninsula had been part of Russia from 1783 to 1954 and even under Ukrainian rule housed Russia’s Black Sea Fleet. It’s not always a pretty history, though: The entire Crimean Tatar population was deported during World War II, and a huge number are thought to have died. Putin touched on this in his speech, admitting that the Crimean Tatars were “treated unfairly” but adding that “millions of people of various ethnicities suffered during those repressions, and primarily Russians.”

Putin also neglected to mention that Crimea’s decision to remain part of Ukraine after the collapse of the Soviet Union came in a referendum on independence in December 1991. In that election, 54 percent of Crimean voters favored independence from Russia — a majority, though the lowest one found in Ukraine.

Two of the most important events in post-World War II history were the division of Germany among Allied powers and the subsequent reunification of Germany after the Soviet Union’s collapse.

“I believe that Europeans, firstly Germans, will understand me,” Putin said during his speech, pointing out that Russia had supported German reunification when others hadn’t. “I am certain that you have not forgotten this, and I count that German citizens will support the aspiration of the Russian world and historical Russia to restore unity.”

It’s true that Russia did play a significant role in reunification negotiations after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, with Mikhail Gorbachev a key supporter of a tactic that allowed the two Germanys to negotiate on their own, without outside powers coming in until later. Regardless, it doesn’t seem as if Germany feels much gratitude here. German Chancellor Angela Merkel has been a frequent critic of Russia’s stance on Crimea over the past few weeks.

After the fall of the Iron Curtain, Yugoslavia fell into a number of wars that eventually led the country to split into the states of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia, Montenegro and Macedonia.

Of particular note was the Bosnian war, which began in 1992 after a successful referendum on independence in the multiethnic region, despite a significant boycott by members of the Serbian minority and their attempts to establish their own state. After Bosnia and Herzegovina declared independence, Bosnian Serbs, with the support of Slobodan Milosevic’s Yugoslav government, began a strategy of ethnic cleansing of Muslim Bosniaks and Croats in the eastern part of Bosnia. After the massacre at Srebrenica in 1995 (during which an estimated 8,000 unarmed Muslim men and boys were killed in a UN safe area), NATO intervened with a sustained air campaign called “Operation Deliberate Force” that attacked Bosnian Serb forces. Within months, a peace agreement was reached.

The breakup of Yugoslavia, and especially the Bosnian war, has an interesting legacy for Russia in light of the situation in Crimea. At the time, Russia contributed forces to help with the NATO-led peacekeeping efforts, but later events, including in Kosovo and the allegations that Russia was helping to hide Bosnian Serbs involved in atrocities, made it clear that Russia wasn’t happy with how things went.

In a key part of his speech, Putin contrasted the situation in Crimea with that of Kosovo, an Albanian-majority region of Serbia that was eventually recognised as independent in 2008.

“The Crimean authorities referred to the well-known Kosovo precedent,” Putin said, “a precedent our Western colleagues created with their own hands in a very similar situation when they agreed that the unilateral separation of Kosovo from Serbia, exactly what Crimea is doing now, was legitimate and did not require any permission from the country’s central authorities.” He later added that the UN regulation on declarations of independence was “crystal clear, as they say.”

Putin is right that in some ways Crimea, with its Russian majority, does look a little like Kosovo, with its own Albanian majority. Both held successful referendums on independence against the wishes of the states they were a part of.

But what’s more significant than the similarities between Crimea and Kosovo are their differences. In The Guardian newspaper, Daniel Drezner has pointed out that NATO only intervened in Kosovo in 1999 after significant evidence of Serbian abuses was collected. Notably, while NATO military action wasn’t sanctioned by the UN, it did take place after the adoption of UN Security Council Resolution 1199, on which Russia had voted.

Perhaps more important, although Kosovo was a de facto independent state after NATO intervention, it didn’t formally announce independence until 2008. That’s almost 10 years between conflict and independence, rather than the mere weeks it has taken in Crimea. Even then, a significant number of states and organisations, including Russia, China and even the United Nations, have not recognised Kosovo as a sovereign state. Putin does have an argument, but it’s certainly not a “crystal clear” situation.

Ultimately, Putin’s appeal to history merges two strands of his political thought: The memories of a Russian empire that drive his plans for a Eurasian Union and his belief that the West’s international dominance is decadent and undeserved.

Where he trips up, however, is in arguing that history can act as a justification in the Crimea situation. History is often complicated and incoherent: Europe’s ever-changing borders don’t necessarily justify anything.

Adam Taylor – The Washington Post

http://www.helsinkitimes.fi/world-int/world-news/international-news/9839-what-history-tells-us-about-russia-crimea-and-putin.html

CATHERINE ASHTON IS CLEARLY ONE OF THESE SAVAGE BRITISH GANGSTERS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER

Snipers Hired By Kiev Protest Leaders – Leaked EU’s Ashton Phone Tape

By RT

March 05, 2014 “Information Clearing House – “RT” – The snipers who shot at protesters and police in Kiev were allegedly hired by Maidan leaders, according to a leaked phone conversation between the EU foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton and Estonian foreign affairs minister, which has emerged online.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article37857.htm

The US, NATO, UN and EU gangsters are piling lie upon lie, and agent provocateur provocation upon provocation. The biggest lie concerns the uprisong in Ukraine which was not spontaneous but was planned inside the bowels of the CIA, EU and US State Department, Victoria Nuland telling exactly that from her very own mouth

http://www.4international.me has been intensely interested in the position of Mrs Catherine Ashton in all of this. This is the very typical EU bureaucrat. Ashton is a politician who made no waves at all in her political life inside her own country. She does not even have the benefit of good looks being an intesely ugly woman to look at by any standard. So no saving graces at all. Yet she was chosen right at the top of the EU Regime in our world.

I find this all very useful and will be so especially for class conscious workers and youth, and her responses give a very clear indication of the gangster mentality that is at stake in this EU attack on Russia. It gives us a glimpse better than anything else just what the EU is all about. Often you do not need heaps of data and statistics to understand something and here it is the personal that tells the story, how Ashton reacts in a conversation to the certain knowledge that the snipers who were firing on the Maidan was in fact snipers employed by the Maidan. We live in the age of the agent provocateur. Ashton says she didn´tpick that up, then she says “Gosh”, but Ashton is on an agenda, which can be understood when you investigate her past political life (sadly no space to do that here but another time)

(start Ashton phone conversation with EU Foreign Minister URMAS PAET here)

“There is now stronger and stronger understanding that behind the snipers, it was not Yanukovich, but it was somebody from the new coalition,” Urmas Paet said during the conversation.

“I think we do want to investigate. I mean, I didn’t pick that up, that’s interesting. Gosh,” Ashton answered.

The call took place after Estonia’s Foreign Minister Urmas Paet visited Kiev on February 25, following the peak of clashes between the pro-EU protesters and security forces in the Ukrainian capital.

Met in Kiev with deputy speaker of Rada and head of Regions Party fraction. It is important to form quickly new government.

— Urmas Paet (@Urmaspaet) February 25, 2014

Paet also recalled his conversation with a doctor who treated those shot by snipers in Kiev. She said that both protesters and police were shot at by the same people.

“And second, what was quite disturbing, this same Olga [Bogomolets] told as well that all the evidence shows that the people who were killed by snipers from both sides, among policemen and then people from the streets, that they were the same snipers killing people from both sides,” the Estonian FM stressed.

Ashton reacted to the information by saying: “Well, yeah…that’s, that’s terrible.”

“So that she then also showed me some photos she said that as a medical doctor she can say that it is the same handwriting, the same type of bullets, and it’s really disturbing that now the new coalition, that they don’t want to investigate what exactly happened,” Paet said.

Olga Bogomolets was the main doctor for the Maidan mobile clinic when protests turned violent in Kiev. She treated the gravely injured and helped organized their transportation to neighboring countries, who had expressed a willingness to treat those with severe wounds. From the outset, Olga blamed the injuries and deaths on snipers. She turned down the position of Vice Prime Minister of Ukraine for Humanitarian Affairs offered by the coup-appointed regime.

The Estonian FM has described the whole sniper issue as “disturbing” and added, “it already discredits from the very beginning” the new Ukrainian power.

His overall impressions of what he saw during his one-day trip to Kiev are “sad,” Paet said during the conversation.

He stressed that the Ukrainian people don’t trust the Maidan leaders, with all the opposition politicians slated to join the new government “having dirty past.”

The file was reportedly uploaded to the web by officers of Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) loyal to ousted President Viktor Yanukovich who hacked Paet’s and Ashton’s phones.

TOMMY ROBINSON IN COURT TODAY (AGAIN) DEFEND ROBINSON UNCONDITIONALLY

WE ON 4INTERNATIONAL HAVE HUGE DIFFERENCES WITH GATES OF VIENNA BECAUSE WE CONSIDER THEM COMMUNIST BAITERS OF THE JOE MCCARTHY TYPE

However this issue of Robinson cuts across that. We defend Robinson uncondionally against the pro-Jihad British ruling class and against the fascist leftists stalinists and anarchists

WE GO ALONG WITH THIS STATEMENT BY GATES OF VIENNA

Tommy Robinson, the former leader of the English Defence League, will appear in court later today on charges unrelated to those that led to his current imprisonment.

We just received this message from a source in the EDL:

Regarding Tommy: Today (the 19th of March) he is facing court over charges of a public disorder offence. Specifically, he is accused of “inciting illegal public assembly” at an EDL rally in Tower Hamlets on 7 September 2013.

Why was Tommy arrested? His “crime” was to make a speech that was slightly longer than three minutes.

There is a new risk that may result from his court appearance: during the hearing he will be moved to another prison, and it is highly likely that this will be a much more dangerous place than HMP Winchester, where he is at present (Tommy “likes” his current prison; the place is quite friendly for him, with a lot of soldiers) .

Keep your fingers crossed for him today! And, for those so inclined, please say a prayer for him.

Any additional word on today’s events in court will be posted here as soon as it comes in.

http://gatesofvienna.net/2014/03/tommy-robinson-in-court-again-today/#more-32825

PLANE WAS HIJACKED…FASCIST LEFT IS COVERING FOR JIHADISTS

Barry Nathan, a Jewish speaker on Talk Radio Europe last Tuesday suggested it might have been a plane hijack and that Iran might have been involved. It was a group discussion and immediately American Journalist Nathan Thomas was Heard to say in response “OH Please!”

I have met this so often. Just recently when I was speaking on Indymedia people attempted to rubbish me. I was speaking on a campaign to save The Irish Hare, one of our native species, from extinction.
I meet this all the time. People who pipe up to throw about all kinds of confusión.

On the plane issue…It has emerged this morning that the former El Al director thinks it is indeed a hijack and we are also informed that Israel is making ready because it could be a plane directed against Israel with Iranian involvement

Why do people shout out when it comes to the involvement of Muslims.
Remember George Bush Jnr on the morning after 9-11 covering for Islam…He said “Islam is a religion of peace”

We meet it everywhere.
My efforts to save The Irish Hare from extinction are being met with a campaign of hatred against me because I am opposed to Jihad

I am a friend of Robert Spencer because he is an opponent of Jihad. I have political differences with Spencer but I am still a friend. THAT IS POSSIBLE

This is more information about this horrific plane situation and Spencer is so useful and astute here because he draws our attention to how Slate Works to keep the Jihad out of the discussion on the plane, now obviously a hijacking.

BEGIN QUOTE HERE
Slate whitewashes Muslim Brotherhood ties of Malaysian pol “fanatically” supported by pilot of missing plane

Here is reality: “Anwar Ibrahim’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood run deep. Ibrahim helped establish the International Institute for Islamic Thought, or IIIT, a Muslim Brotherhood front group in the United States. IIIT has come under fire for their connections with terrorist organizations. In 2002, Anwar Ibrahim’s IIIT was included in a lawsuit by victims of 9/11 seeking damages from organizations linked to ‘rendering material support to radical Islamism.’ In 2003, US government prosecutors ‘submitted court documents detailing financial support (PDF) from the IIIT for convicted Palestinian Islamic Jihad fundraiser Sami al-Arian.’ They also found that Taha Jaber al-Alwani, the president of IIIT had once stated via a fatwa that ‘jihad is the only way to liberate Palestine.’ A US Customs official said that the government is also looking into the possibility that IIIT was involved in ‘terrorism-related money laundering activities.’”

Zaharie Ahmad Shah was a “fanatical” supporter of Anwar Ibrahim. Pictured is Anwar Ibrahim with Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi. In January 2009, during a Friday sermon broadcast on Al-Jazeera, Qaradawi prayed that Allah would kill all the Jews: “Oh Allah, take this oppressive, Jewish, Zionist band of people. Oh Allah, do not spare a single one of them. Oh Allah, count their numbers, and kill them, down to the very last one.” He also declared: “Throughout history, Allah has imposed upon the [Jews] people who would punish them for their corruption. The last punishment was carried out by [Adolf] Hitler.”…

Here is Slate’s fantasy version of the facts. Why are Americans generally so woefully ignorant of the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat? Because of misleading stories like this one: “The Malaysia Airlines Pilot’s Politics: Zaharie Ahmad Shah supported Anwar Ibrahim. That’s common sense, not zealotry,” by William J. Dobson for Slate, March 17:

…A fanatical supporter of Anwar Ibrahim does sound scary—as long as you know nothing about him.

Anwar is the 66-year old opposition leader who is the principal thorn in the side of the United Malays National Organization (UMNO) that has ruled Malaysia for 56 years. Anwar heads a coalition of parties, which includes his own multiethnic party, that has made the greatest inroads against the country’s corrupt masters. In 2008, the opposition won more than a third of the seats in parliament—the first time that UMNO lost its supermajority that allowed it to change the constitution at the prime minister’s whim. Anwar, who had been a political prisoner for six years, most of it in solitary confinement, won his seat in a landslide, and the opposition won five of the country’s 13 state governments. Last year, his opposition party claimed to have won the election against the ruling party, a contest that many say was marred by widespread fraud. Anwar supported the massive protests that followed the ruling party’s supposed victory, but he never called for a toppling of the government.

Anwar is trying to defeat Malaysia’s authoritarian regime through elections—not terrorism, let alone revolution. So, to be clear, what we know is that the pilot of MH370 is a fanatical supporter of a nonviolent man who supports a pluralistic and democratic Malaysia….

WHAT TO DO
Robert Spencer is right but the conclusión is we need a real Trotskyist Party that will oppose the Jihad. That party is no other than http://www.4international.me

4international said it first…it was a Jihadist plane hijacking

Within minutes of hearing about this 4international took a position of saying this was Jihad

Now out of all the great brains int he world we are being proved more and more to be correct

As this extract from http://www.debka.com shows:

The US, Russia and China Sunday, March 16 contributed their military satellites to the search for the Malaysian Boeing 777, missing without a trace for nine days with 239 people aboard. US drones have also been diverted from the Afghanistan war to the hunt, which is focusing increasingly on the former Soviet republics of Central Asia.

The backgrounds of the pilot and co-pilot and the rest of the crew are under rigorous investigation for leads. Scrutiny of the passengers, 153 of whom are Chinese, is slow since not all the foreign governments have come up with answers to questions about their nationals.

The multinational investigation is looking closely at a number of conjectures:
1. The contents of the plane’s cargo: Did it contain some illicit freight that would have given one or more hijackers a motive to seize control of the plane, force it to land at a remote spot and vanish with their prize?

That scenario would leave the fate of the passengers and crew up in the air. They may still be alive and marooned in some wild corner of the world.
2. Many parts of the Silk Road nations of Kirgizstan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan are broad desert wastelands. They all have abandoned derelict military and air bases left over from the defunct Soviet empire. Military satellites and drones manned by experts have the best chance of pinpointing MH370 in this sort of country.

It is now believed that the last contact with MH370 was beamed from the ground, meaning that the plane had not spent hours aloft but somewhere on land, which is why the Malaysian transport minister disclosed Sunday that the search now covered “areas of land in 11 countries.”

3. The cockpit is being painstakingly searched for clues. One theory is that the hijackers lurked in the plane before the passengers boarded after they were smuggled in through the cargo hold. They may have belonged to the East Turkestan Liberation Organization-ETLO, the Uyghur separatist movement of the northwest Chinese province of Xinjiang.
This conjecture opens up more complex potentials, such as the possible refueling of the airliner for use by the hijackers as an instrument of deadly massacre, echoing the 9/11 atrocities perpetrated by al Qaeda against New York and Washington.
Speculation on those lines has brought the US, Russia and China into the heart of the search and the investigation.
4. Another possibility under consideration is a sudden cyber attack on the plane. These methods are advanced enough these days to control, navigate and bring a large aircraft 75 meters long with a 61-meter wing span like the Boeing 777 down to earth almost intact at a preset location.
Iran, apparently with Chinese expert assistance, managed to bring down the RQ-170 Sentinel, America’s most secret UAV, by this method. The Israeli army downed an Iranian drone launched from Lebanon by an Iranian Revolutionary Guards cyber team in October, 2012.
Loth to expose its advanced cyber capabilities, Israel held to the story that the Iranian drone was shot down by its fighter jets.

If the Malaysian airliner was indeed commandeered by this means, the attackers may not have intended to go all the way and were forced to think fast and decide how to end the episode without leaving incriminating leads behind them. Dumping the plane in a remote place would answer this need.

5. US intelligence and security investigators were focusing Sunday on the two pilots, Zaharie Ahmad Shah, 53, who has logged 18,000 flying hrs. on similar aircraft, and co-pilot Fariq Abdul Hamid, 27, for answers to the key conundrums of the mystery.
Both their homes in Kuala Lumpur have been searched. The flight simulator found in the captain’s home is being carefully checked for telltale flight routes.
Any possibly links in the backgrounds of the pilots to potential hijackers or terrorists would help solve the mystery of the vanished Malaysian airliner and provide a lead to its fate.

US AND EU IMPERIALISM IS ALREADY AT WAR AGAINST RUSSIA…DRONE BROUGHT DOWN YESTERDAY

The issue of Ukraine is really very simple.

The power of US and EU Imperialism with its powerful Media claim they stand for Ukrainian Independence. But the US and EU are using their power not to créate an independent Ukraine at all, but a Ukraine which will be used as a Communist Hating base from which to attack Russia by means of Thermo Nuclear weapons

This is a very old problem indeed. We stand for national Independence. But in a world dominated by blood thirsty US and EU Imperialism what if this National Independence is clearly a base for war against Communism.

Against Communism? Yes!

Putin is no Communist, that is true. But Russia was the country in which the working class took state power, in 1917, in the FIRST successful worker´s revolution.

In these conditions…yes Ukraine must have its Independence, but a true Independence, and not an “Independence” which has it as the base for Nuclear Weapons pointing across at the border with Russia.

(By the way Crimea is Russia and the action of Kruschev in giving away Crimea in 1952 was an ilegal action by a Stalinist who was not a Russian patriotic person)

Putin is a Smart person and is a good and a brave reader of reality.

The reality is that the US and EU are already at war with Russia. (By the way the Jews of Israel should realise here that Obama and Kerry are also already at war, behind the Palestinian Muslim Jihadists, with the state of Israel.

War is inevitable.

It is already happening. Yesterday a drone based in Bavaria was sent across Crimea by US and EU Imperialism. This drone was very high, certainly out of sight from the ground, and thus was in a position to spy deeply inside Russia itself.

Putin being a brave patriot of Russia ordered that this drone be brought down. Scientific Russia did so quite easily and is now in the possession of Russia…expect more on this

The US Imperialists control the Media and will seek to turn this justified defence on its head. The aggressor here is of course the US and EU Imperialists.

Meanwhile the Jewish leadership of Israel is going behind the US and EU Imperialists, and are such slaves of Imperialism, they are such cowards and snuggle up behind US Imperialism in everything, THUS BETRAYING THE JEWISH STRUGGLE FOR NATIONAL LIBERATION AGAINST ARAB JIHADISM.

This is a very serious matter indeed for Jews.

Jews should be seeking an Alliance with Putin because Jews and Russians here are facing the same enemy

Will Jews do this? No! Answer is no they will not.

For that to happen the Jews need a new leadership

WHAT TO DO

It is necessary to build http://www.4international.me in all the world because the crisis of capitalism drives Imperialism to War on all fronts. Only socialist revolution can lead the world out of barbarity caused by capitalism.

FASCIST ON ISRAPUNDIT CALLS FOR THE BEHEADING OF CHRISTIANS

THIS IS UNBELIEVABLE

ISRAPUNDIT LEADING COMMENT(ER) CALLS FOR THE BEHEADING OF CHRISTIANS

EDITOR BELMAN KEEPS POST UP AND THIS FASCIST IN PLACE ON ISRAPUNDIT

he goes by the name of Yamit82 which is a false name in every respect

This is the background. The totally Antisemitic Christian Evangelical Groups are holding a big annual event meeting in Jerusalem.

These Evangelicals are Antisemitic in the opinión of our http://www.4international.me (see
March 10 – 14 marks the third Christ at the Checkpoint conference, in Bethlehem.)

They “SAY” they defend Israel, but they are “IN PRACTICE” aiming to convert the Jews to Christianity

Why is this so serious? It is so serious because from its birth, emerging from out of the Jewish Movement, Christianity was the very worst oppressor of the Jews, and the Holocaust of Hitler was motivated by Christianity.

What is needed here is a new leadership in Israel, based on the Israeli and Jewish national liberation movement, to explain the horror history of Christianity to all Jews, and to carry on a massive campaign against the Vatican and all forms of Christianity, which will be focussed strongly on a factual understanding of history.

That requires a political struggle.

But Belman´s “fascist on Israpundit” tries to steer Jews away from science, from a political understanding of the issue, into Mumbo Jumbo and basically conspiracy crap, and away from reality.

Belman gives this Fascist the platform on his site for this.

Then there is this. Speaking of these Christian Missionaries in Israel Belman´s Yamit82 explodes:

If it were up to me they would be kicked out of Israel jailed and if need be beheaded. I am not into christian love or ecumenicism.

COMMENT ON

yamit82 says:

March 13, 2014 at 6:34 pm
URL IS http://www.israpundit.com/archives/63594667#comments

That is the reason for Yamit82 to be kicked right off Israpundit but will editor Belman do that? Not a chance! So Belman here is the problema and not Yamit82.

What Belman and Yamit82 have done is absolutely lethal for Jews. At a time when Christains are being beheaded by Jihadists in Syria, and were beheaded also in the Woods of Yugoslavia by Arab Jihadists, which the Muslim Bosnian Izetbegovic had brought in to wage Jihad on the Serbs, we have this

SHAME ON YOU BELMAN!

UTTER SHAME ON YOU BELMAN FOR HAVING THIS HORROR YAMIT82 ON YOUR JEWISH SITE!