POPE IN SPAIN, OBAMA IN INDIA, CHRISTIANS IN SUDAN AND IRAQ

AS THE POPE VISITS SPAIN AS SPAIN ENTERS ECONOMIC AND MORAL CRISIS

AS OBAMA VISITS INDIA AS INDIANS ARE MURDERED BY ISLAMIC JIHAD

THEY ARE BOTH SILENT ONT HE ISSUE. THEY COVER FOR ISLAM BARBARISM. WHY?

THIS IS REFERRED TO BY PAMELA GELLER

Obama’s Teleprompter Debuts in India

I wonder if his doppelganger is multi-lingual.

Screengrab from this video — first question from a student is “what is your take or opinion on jihad?”

Obama: huminah huminah……. “Islam is one of the world’s great religions. “Peace, justice, fairness, tolerance. This great religion, in the hands of a few extremists.”

No, I am not making this up…and no, he didn’t answer her question. Imagine he is saying this to the people of India. Over 80 million Hindus have been slaughtered by jihad.

 

 

THESE LEADERS, OBAMA, THE POPE, HAGUE, ARE ALL UNITED IN AN UNWRITTEN CAMPAIGN OF ESSENTIALLY ANTISEMITISM

 

IN A RECENT ARTICLE WE WROTE

 

“

The Pope and Zapatero are in alliance with Islam and with Iran…that is the fact which is glaring at us.

These word merchants like the venerable Senor Bono are so good with words on the morning programmes. But when Iran has the Nuclear Bomb and the Costas are within reach of the rocketry of Iran, which is quite outstanding in its sophistication, then mr Bono all words will cease, and you and your people will fry.”

 

WHAT IS LEFT OUT IS THE REALITY OF ANTISEMITISM, THAT THE FORCES OF ANTISEMITISM LED BY IRAN ARE AIMING TO GET THE NUCLEAR BOMB TO WIPE OUT ISRAEL, THUS ADVANCING THE JIHAD IN THE WORLD IMMEASURABLY.

PUSH OUT THE TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA TO AMERICANS AND ISRAELIS

by Jim Stephens

April 19, 2010

This is another great analysis by DEBKAfile. Yet we on 4international disagree on a very important point.

But first the Debka analysis:

DEBKAfile Special Report April 18, 2010, 8:24 AM (GMT+02:00)

A wakeup call Israel must heed

The New York Times Sunday, April 18, reveals a secret memo from US Defense Security Robert Gates determining that the White House has no effective policy for dealing with Iran’s steady progress towards nuclear capability. This confirms what debkafile has been saying for more than a year, while also exposing the hollowness of the assurances of Israeli leaders – current and past – that it was safe to line up behind US strategy for preventing Iran obtaining nuclear weapons..
Gates confirmed that there was no strategy to line up behind.
Even so, in the last couple of weeks, President Shimon Peres, prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu, defense ministry Ehud Barak and chief of staff Lt. Gen. Gaby Ashkenazi have still not abandoned their mantra: It is not up to Israel to address the Iranian nuclear issue, but “the free world,” starting with the United States. This is strange, since in all their long conversations with the US defense secretary in recent weeks, they must have discovered that the Obama administration was out of options for Iran. So why have the prime minister and defense minister not switched course and developed an independent position on Israel’s vital security concerns before it is too late – or at least stopped deceiving the public with false comfort?
According to debkafile’s Washington sources, the Gates memo, filed in January to National Security Adviser James Jones, was leaked now, even though it demonstrates the US president’s standard rhetoric on Iran was without substance, in order to bring out the fact that the Obama administration has become reconciled to the reality of an Islamic Republic capable of manufacturing nuclear weapons.

The memo stressed a variety concerns “including the absence of an effective strategy should Iran choose the course that many government and outside analysts consider likely: Iran could assemble all the major parts it needs for a nuclear weapon – fuel, designs and detonators – but just stop short of assembling a fully operational weapon.” Gates also calls for “new thinking about how the United States might contain Iran’s power if it decided to produce a  weapon, and how to deal with the possibility that fuel or weapons could be obtained by one of the terrorist groups Iran supports.”
In the light of the memo, administration officials began issuing ambiguous statements in firm tones.
Friday, April 16, Jones insisted: “the fact that we don’t announce publicly our entire strategy… doesn’t mean we don’t have a strategy… we do.” Another administration official said last week that the US would ensure that Iran would not “acquire a nuclear capability. That includes the ability to have a breakout.”

WHAT UTTER AND EVIL BILGE COMES OUT OF THESE LIARS IN THE AMERICAN OBAMA GOVERNMENT! OBAMA ACCEPTS THAT IRAN WILL GET ALL THE PARTS FOR A NUCLEAR BOMB READY, LINED UP AS IT WERE. BUT NOT TO WORRY AT THAT, SOMEHOW (NOT STATED) THE US WOULD STOP THE “BREAKOUT”! THEN THEY SAY THAT IT WOULD NOT BE POSSIBLE TO KNOW WHEN THE CRITICAL STAGE WAS REACHED…NOW THAT IS TRUE! (4int)

Regarding this “breakout,” Gates expressed concern in his memo that intelligence agencies might miss signals that Iran was taking the final steps towards producing a weapon. He admitted in an interview that it might not be possible to verify that Iran had gone past the threshold to actually assembly a weapon.

Some sources are quoted by the NYT as calling the US defense secretary’s memo a wakeup call.
Now that Israel’s reliance on Washington has proved badly misplaced, debkafile urges its leaders to treat the memo in the same light and finally get their act together. 

http://www.debka.com/article/8725/

WHAT TO DO IN THE FACE OF US GOVERNMENT LIES

1. Believe nothing that comes from the American Government

2. find out the truth, as DEBKAfile tries very hard to do

3. reach the American and Israeli (especially) publics with this truth

4. have great campaigns to push these truths out, SETTING UP PRO ISRAEL COMMITTEES EVERYWHERE WE CAN

5. get behind organizations such as Z street, the Jihadwatch legal case, and the San remo Second Conference

BUT ABOVE ALL YOU MUST HAVE A REVOLUTIONARY TROTSKYIST PARTY FO FIGHT ON BEHALF OF THE JEWS AGAINST THE FASCIST LEFT

OBAMA GIVES UP ON SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN…LEAVES ISRAEL ALONE

By Jim Stephens

April 19, 2010

WHO NOW BELIEVES ANYTHING THAT OBAMA OR HILARY SAYS?

Obama has given up on the sanctions plan. Instead he makes some promise to Israel which has no meaning whatsoever. Obama is a very false leader and not one Jew in Israel now believes one word that he or any on his team, especially those Jewish traitors on his team, say

We will reprint this analysis by DEBKAfile and ask our readers to study it carefully

http://www.debka.com/article/8727/

[Begin DEBKAfile analysis here]

DEBKAfile Exclusive Analysis April 19, 2010, 2:18 PM (GMT+02:00)

US pulls another rug from Israeli security

President Barack Obama has done away with two key elements of US-Israeli strategic relations: His administration has given up on stiff  UN Security Council sanctions on Iran over its nuclear drive, and gone back on the longstanding American commitment assuring Israel of recognized and defensible borders in any future accommodation with its Arab neighbors.

In the administration’s message of congratulations to Israel on its 62nd Day of Independence, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton mentions “recognized borders” while omitting the traditional “defensible.”
WHAT A CHOICE…TOUGH SANCTIONS WHICH WOULD BE BLOCKED BY CHINA, OR A NON BINDING GA RESOLUTION! BOTH WAYS ISRAEL IS SCREWED GOOD AND PROPER! (4int)

Debkafile’s Washington sources report that following the talks held by Presidents Obama and Hu Jintao in Washington last week, the Administration is apparently engaged in a debate about whether to push for tough sanctions against Iran at the Security Council and run into opposition from China and other countries – or go for a quick UN General Assembly resolution, which would be non-binding.
The view William Burns, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, offered the House foreign affairs committee last week was that a UN resolution would clear the way for the European Union and other countries to “amplify the impact” of whatever sanctions are agreed on. Burns avoided mentioning the Security Council and indicated that the administration had little hope of any effective action on Iran by the world body.

(from above “clear the way for the UN”, we are falling off the stool laughing at that one. The EU antisemites WANT to see Israel destroyed, never mind the damage Iran could do to them … 4int)

It will be recalled that President Obama twice asked Israel to ignore Iran’s missed deadlines and promised to promote effective UN Security Council sanctions if Iran continued to spurn his diplomatic efforts for curbing its nuclear program.
The last deadline was in December, 2009.
Yet on Monday, April 19, clearly lagging behind events in Washington, Israel’s defense minister Ehud Barak said: “Now is the time for sanctions (against Iran).”
He was answering questions in a radio interview on Israel’s annual day of mourning for its fallen servicemen
Neither he nor any other Israeli leader commented on an equally serious setback for Israel in Washington, which emerge from a conspicuous omission in Clinton’s message of congratulations for Israel’s Independence Day, which is celebrated Monday night and Tuesday:  

“I have a deep personal commitment to Israel,” she said. “And so does President Obama. Our nation will not waver in protecting Israel’s security and promoting Israel’s future. That is why pursuing peace and recognized borders for Israel is one of our top priorities.”
THERE WILL ALWAYS BE BORDERS, IF ISRAEL EXISTS, BUT WILL THEY BE DEFENSIBLE BORDERS? THAT IS NOT A SLIGHT QUESTION. THAT IS THE QUESTION! (4int)

By omitting “defensible borders” from her message, she spoke for the first US administration to abdicate its guarantee of defensible borders as a fundamental component of Israel’s security, thereby nullifying her and the US president’s pledge not to “waver in protecting Israel’s security.”
This key omission led to another worrying question about Israel’s future borders: By whom must they be recognized in the view of the Obama administration?  

Once again we are all indebted to Debka for being on the ball, actually way ahead of Barak and the Israeli Government who simply cannot keep up, and whose heads must be spinning, ready to explode such is the pressure being exerted by this very powerful American led New World Order or World Empire.

WHAT THEN IS TO DO?

For Jews there is no salvation whatsoever in the help and the forces of American Imperialism, by that we mean the forces of the American elites or ruling class.

But there is help from the American people, if it is known how to seek that help.

First and foremost we need a revolutionary Trotskyist party to be created (built). that is the fundamental. it is impossible to take even one tiny step to develop theory into practice without that party.

But others can do lots. There must be an analysis of the situation made by groups such as ZStreet, Jihadwatch, Israpundit and a host of others.

The San Remo Conference initiative to happen soon is a big big event.

We on 4international think now, and have always thought and stated, that the focus must be on the ordinary American people, at the same time the Israeli Jewish people, and an appeal to others, but those two are central and must be focussed upon.

And we on 4international will work with anybody on that basis.

Every piece of “secret” diplomacy must be made as public as possible and the ordinary people of America and of Israel must urgently see and understand the truth.

We on 4international believe that the Obama Government is antisemitic. They are antisemites in much the same way as is, for example, the Palestine Solidarity Campaign. Obama and Clinton tell lies in order to hide that reality

ARAB LEAGUE AND OBAMA ARE THE EXACT SAME…BUT JERUSALEM IS JEWISH HISTORICALLY

by Jim Stephens

March 29, 2010

Telling the Big Lie

The Arabs are claiming that Jerusalem is an Arab city. Historical Revisionism! What rubbish!

[Begin report from Israel National News]

(IsraelNN.com) The Arab League concluded its 22nd summit in Libya on Sunday without any changes from its longstanding policies: no to recognizing Israel under any conditions, yes to armed resistance (aka terror) against Israel, no condemnation of genocide in Darfur, yes to Arab Jerusalem, and more. A follow-up meeting will be held in October

This summit focused on Jerusalem, which the League termed an Arab city. “East Jerusalem is an integral part of the occupied Palestinian lands of 1967. All procedures that are carried out by the Israeli Occupation Authorities is illegal, and does not change the legal status of the city that remains occupied, nor does it impact the political status as the capital of Palestine,” the League stated.

The League called on United States President Barack Obama to continue criticizing the building of homes for Jews in Judea, Samaria, and eastern and northern Jerusalem. Israel must not be allowed to “Judaize” the city, Arab ministers said.

As the summit opened, Arab leaders agreed to give the Palestinian Authority $500 million to “fight Judaization” in Jerusalem and promote its own interests in the city.

Jerusalem has historically been a majority-Jewish city. In 1948, the Jordanian army drove Jews out of historic Jerusalem, including the City of David and the Old City.

Jews returned to the eastern and northern neighborhoods of Jerusalem 19 years later, in 1967, and have remained there since. The land has been annexed to Israel, and is officially part of the nation’s capital city. However, the PA claims that the areas temporarily controlled by Jordan rightfully belong to the PA as capital of a future Arab state.

The League determined that if Israel were to give the PA control over all areas controlled by Egypt and Jordan from 1948 to 1967 – Judea, Samaria, Gaza, and much of Jerusalem – the Arab League would support peace. However, the League would not recognize Israel as a Jewish state.

No to Terrorism – just call it “Resistance”
The Arab League also condemned terrorism, but then redefined the word “terrorism” to exclude attacks intended to “resist occupation.” The change in terminology effectively gives the green light to groups such as Hamas, Fatah, and Hizbullah, which justify their attacks on Israeli civilians by saying that Israel was established on Arab land.

While giving lip service to the war on terrorism, the League also condemned the assassination of arch-terrorist Mahmoud al-Mabhouh of Hamas. Mabhouh was killed in Dubai, in an operation that the world has blamed on Israel.

Support for Libya, Syria, Sudan
League members also agreed to express support for Arab countries under Western pressure. League members backed Sudan, expressing solidarity with the country and rejecting “attempts to violate its sovereignty.”

Sudan has faced widespread criticism for failing to stop an ongoing genocide in the Darfur region of the country, and for allegedly giving support to the perpetrators. Arab militias have slaughtered tens of thousands of non-Arab Muslims in Darfur, and many more have died of starvation.

The League also called for compensation for Libya over losses it sustained due to Western sanctions following the Lockerbie bombing. It supported Syria in its demand that Israel hand over control of the strategic Golan region, which was annexed to Israel following the 1967 Six Day War.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/136776

Karl Marx visited the city of Jerusalem more than a century and a half ago and wrote following that visit

[Begin what Karl Marx said about Jerusalem]

in an article written in 1854 [1] Marx turned his attention to the fate of the Jews of the Holy Land. Curiously enough, this piece turns out to be more or less the only thing he ever wrote in which he displays some sympathy for his own people.

So, this is what he says about the Jews of Jerusalem:

[Quote from Marx starts here]

“The Mussulmans, forming about a fourth part of the whole, and consisting of Turks, Arabs and Moors, are, of course, the masters in every respect, as they are in no way affected with the weakness of their Government at Constantinople. Nothing equals the misery and suffering of the Jews at Jerusalem, inhabiting the most filthy quarter of the town, called hareth-el-yahoud, this quarter of dirt between  Mount Zion and Mount Moriah, where their synagogues are situated – the constant objects of Mussulman oppression and intolerance, insulted by the Greeks, persecuted by the Latins and living only upon the scanty alms transmitted by their European brethren. The Jews, however, are not natives, but from distant and different countries, and are only attracted to Jerusalem by the desire of inhabiting the Valley of Jehosophat and to die in the very places where their Redemptor is to be expected.

‘Attending their death,’ says a French author, ‘they suffer and pray. Their regards turned to that mountain of Moriah, where once rose the temple of Solomon, and which they dare not approach, they shed tears on the misfortunes of Zion, and their dispersion over the world.'”[2]

[Quote from Marx ends here]

In passing, Marx informs us that Jerusalem had 15,500 inhabitants, including 8,000 Jews and 4,000 Moslems (Arabs, Turks and Moors).

His remarks are confirmed by all contemporary observers. We will leave out the surveys of the Alliance Israelite Universelle, whose objectivity might be questioned by suspicious readers, and rely instead on the accounts of Catholic writers of travel guides for pilgrims to the Holy Land. These edifying tours invariably culminated in the contemplation of the spectacle – both instructive and heartrending – of the downtrodden Jews, living in the most extreme poverty. Frozen in prayer before the Wailing Wall, they formed a living illustration of the degeneration of the “killers of God.” And in order to heighten the impact of this grand finale, a point would be made, before undertaking this final step,  including a visit to the Jewish quarter in the programme.

“This is by far the darkest and most unhealthy part of the whole city. (…) The wretched appearance of the inhabitants and the disgusting state of this district mean that nobody passing through it can forget God’s curse which weighs so visibly on the Jewish people.”[3]

Let’s return to the picture Marx painted of the Jews of Jerusalem.

What does he show us?

* That the Jews inhabit “the most filthy quarter of the town”, “the quarter of dirt.”

* That they were “the constant objects of Mussulman oppression and intolerance,” without this sparing them the insults of the Greeks and persecution of the Latins…

http://emperors-clothes.com/letters/vilkelis.htm