by Felix Quigley
January 14, 2008
Adam le Bor who is linked to the reactionary pro NATO Harry’s Place has opened up a new front against Israel as the small Jewish country fights for its survival against Islamic Jihad and world anti-Semitism, as seen in the anti-Semitic placards carried on demos in many cities last weekend.
Le Bor is not only linked to the leeches on Harry’s Place and to people like Oliver Kamm, he is also associated with a guy called Anthony Dworkin who runs the pro NATO Crimes of War website.
So far the links between the Jihad against the Serbs, supported by US and EU Governments have not been drawn to what is happening against Israel.
But these links are very real.
The same Big Lie techniques of the Media that were used against the Serbs are being used wholesale against the Jews.
Le Bor is just one. There were so many involved in the Big Lie against the Serbs, people like Maggie O’Kane from Dublin and almost all of the rotten Media. One exception and one exception only the wonderful, sadly now deceased Eve Ann Prentice.
Le Bor is the first of these to come out in a scandalous atack on the right of the Jews of Israel to defend themselves against a Jihadist enemy.
This link is of the greatest importance because it opens up the way that the US and EU Governments are feeding finance into Abbas who in turn is passing it on to Hamas.
Le Bor is either a total idiot or a scheming liar. I caught him on the Maurice Boland radio show some months ago claiming that Hajj Amin el Husseini had spent the war years in Berlin. Having written books on the area le Bor claimed then that he did not know. That is he did not know the fact that is known by all historians, el Husseini was the leader of the Holocaust in the Balkans and is photographed there with the Nazi SS. You take your pick about Le Bor, idiot or liar, I know which one I choose, liar.
Why did Le Bor insist on keeping el Husseini in Berlin and not in the Balkans? he did so because he wanted to keep his association with Izetbegovic hidden. In fact they both were members during the Holocaust in the Balkans of the Muslim Brotherhood. They had to be closely involved in the Holocaust of Jews, Serbs and Romany in the Balkans and wider.
Dworkin introduces his piece called “On War Crimes in Gaza” and its first sentence suffices for us to know his anti Israel line. I have no intention of delving any deeper in the reactionary guff of Dworkin because really his whole politics is contained in his first sentence
[Begin quote here from Dworkin]
Israel launched its latest full-scale offensive against Hamas in Gaza on December 27, saying its action was necessary to end rocket attacks against Israeli towns.
[End quote from Dworkin here]
On 4international we are mindful of our reader’s time. Why delve any deeper into this anti Israel filth from this liar?
Dworkin seems to live in an imaginary world, where rocket attacks are only at the level of Israel “saying” that Israel is being attacked.
No Dworkin you political fool the rockets are real and everybody in the world knows that they are real, so why is it in your mind only a matter of “Israel saying”!
Dworkin never once refers to the anti-Semitic political theory that underpins Hamas and Fatah. Dworkin does not once tell the actual history of these rockets. Of course how could he since he does not really believe the rockets are a fact, that they exist in this real material world, just that Israel is “saying”.
Dworkin never refers to the Jews leaving Gaza and handing it to the Arabs. Why not?
He is moving the reader into “proportionality” etc and into discussing how many Arabs die, how many Israelis die.
Which is totally immaterial.
The only thing that matters in this case is the very first rocket that was fired by these Arab terrorists into Israel from Gaza. It is the first rocket that is the casus belli. Not the second or third Dworkin you Dwork! The first, got it!
And since Hamas has fired 6000 rockets over 8 years against Jews in Israel then there must have been a number 1. That Dwork is the casus Belli.
Let us turn to Adam le Bor who is posing as a friend of the Jews, writes for all sorts including this site Jewcy!!!
In fact let us treat our readers re le Bor to the same treatment. Let us not BORE our readers unduly with le Bor!
So I will spare the reader all with just one paragraph and here I am being most generous because in fact boredom may indeed set in before the end. Try to stick with it!
[Begin paragraph from Adam le Bor here]
Let’s start with Israel. International law requires that military operations meet standards of proportionality. Is the attack self-defense or an act of aggression? Is the scope and scale of the military campaign proportionate to the threat? Israel has the right under international law to take military action in self-defense against Hamas, but the proportionality of the scope and scale of its campaign remains debatable. The high civilian casualty figures — 920 Palestinians killed, including 292 children, according to Palestinian sources — only add to this unease. There is also the crucial question of intent. Is Israel seeking merely to end the rocket attacks, which is legally justifiable, or aiming to completely destroy Hamas as an organization and political force, which is not. However, even if Israel plans to destroy Hamas’ organization, this objective in itself is not a war crime.
[End quote here]
http://www.hurryupharry.org/2009/01/14/on-war-crimes-in-gaza/
It is the sentence in the middle that I wish to draw the reader’s attention to in order to understand what kind of a man le Bor really is. This is the man who Maurice Boland, Dublin Jewish man, invited le Bor onto his radio show to talk about Yugoslavia and War Crimes committed by the Serbs on Muslims!!!
His figures like this:
920 “Palestinians” killed
292 children
and this supposed to be trusted journalist and supposed friend of the Jews writing of course on JEWCY adds a detail which may not be picked up by anybody who trusts le Bor, the words “according to Palestinian sources”.
Le Bor thus does not have time to seek out any Israeli sources.
But he takes the word of the Arabs for this vital statistic.
According to Le Bor it means that one in three in this war who has been killed by Israel is a child!!!
All I can say about Le Bor is “What a spreader of Arab Paslestinian lies he is”.
Is LeBor not part of the same gang who we saw in London Dublin etc going about on demos carrying these imitation babies. The same lying propaganda no!
Le Bor has written lots, but he has never written about the Mohammed el Durra France 2 case, never about the fake Jenin massacre, never about the Qana affair which was proved totally bogus by British site EU Referendum and in which the issue of dead children was used callously by Arabs against Israel.
Just on this one sentence Le Bor has given us all an insight into his lies and his lying political and journalistic method.
Here le Bor is a purveyor of the lies of the Arab Hamas crowd all Jew haters to a one. Is he not! Is this not what he is doing in essence? In Yugoslavia he was the purveyor along with so many, Maggie O’Kane et al, of all those lies of the Izetbegovic Islamist crowd against the Serbs!
The man is a sewer. He follows the Islamofascists around the world and purveys their lies for them. He did it for Izetbegovic. Now he is doing it for Hamas. Is he not?
Why would le Bor take this lying figure from the Arabs in the conflict?
It is the worst of all charges.
ONE IN THREE DEAD ARABS BEING A CHILD.
But le Bor does not even blush in spreading this figure no more than he did when he also falsely said that there was a massacre of 8000 in Srebrenica
These people who are posing as journalists etc are really the scum of the earth.
These are the people who are stepping up the attack on Israel which is fighting against a classic Jihad operation. The Jews move out of Gaza and give it to the Arabs. The Arabs stick it in their back pocket, say to the Jews thank you very much, and intensify the attack.
If Olmert gives Abbas and Fatah Judea and Samaria Abbas will pocket it as well, not even bother to say thanks, flood the area with Jihadists, and attack attack and attack again. But this time they would have gained more and made the central part of Israel 9 miles or so wide.
But why should le Bor care. As Jews face nuclear annihilation…He will be off writing another book and if Maurice Boland, Dublin Jewish radio host gives le Bor another plug on his show it will be worse than scandalous. It will be a betrayal of the Serbs. It will be a betrayal of the Jews.
DO NOT READ THESE 3 PARAGRAPHS IF YOU ARE ALREADY BORED BY LE BOR
I will add an apendix to this article. Please resist reading if you hate being bored by le Bor
These are 3 critical paragraphs
[Begin 3 critical paragraphs by le Bor here]
Three incidents in particular give cause for concern that Israel has breached international humanitarian law and/or committed potential war crimes. The first was the killing of numerous Hamas police officers at a passing out parade in Gaza city in the first wave of bombing. These policemen were part of Hamas’s political and civil infrastructure, certainly, but were not engaged in combat at the time and were not obviously involved in organizing or carrying out attacks against Israel, and that is the crucial point. If the police were regularly engaged in attacking Israel then arguably they could be a legitimate target, even while on parade. But most press reports say that the Hamas police were used for traffic control and internal security.
The second incident was the bombing of the Fakhura school, run by the UN, in Jabaliyah refugee camp. Civilians are increasingly seeking shelter in UN buildings, the GPS co-ordinates of which are given by the UN to the IDF. About 40 Palestinian civilians were killed when an Israeli mortar hit the school. The IDF claimed that Hamas militants fired from near the school. It responded with three mortars. Two hit their targets, the third missed by thirty meters and hit the school, causing terrible carnage. Israeli troops are allowed to fire back at Hamas, but are obliged to ensure that harm to nearby civilians is not disproportionate. If there is a high risk that the attack would cause disproportionate harm to nearby civilians they are obliged to hold their fire. Again, the degree of risk is a matter of interpretation. Accidentally hitting a nearby school while engaged in actual combat with the enemy in that vicinity would be unlikely to classed as a war crime as the law allows for some degree of confusion and error.
The third incident took place in Zeitoun, a district of Gaza city, where, according to survivors’ reports, Israeli soldiers ordered about 100 members of the Samouni clan into a single home one night. Early the next morning Israeli troops repeatedly shelled the house, killing and wounding dozens. Some managed to flee, carrying the wounded and the dying. However, according to the Red Cross, Israel only allowed its medics to enter the house on Wednesday, where they found a chilling scene: four weak and distraught toddlers, clinging to the bodies of their mothers. According to the Red Cross: “the Israeli military failed to meet its obligation under international humanitarian law to care for and evacuate the wounded.” Israel said it was waiting for the Red Cross to present its evidence.
Paragraph 1…What world is le Bor living in? Hamas is at war with Israel. Does le Bor not get that yet?
Critical words are when le Bor gives his sources as being “most press reports” but so what le Bor, if the Press is hostile to Israel and is friendly to the terorists of Hamas
Paragraph 2.
Where did the IDF claim that? Le Bor gives no sources, in fact never does in this article. Nice and vague!
Paragraph 3
Critical words of professional liar le Bor are “according to survivors reports”. That is acording to Arab Palestinian Hamas reports. What if the “survivors” were spinning a yarn which was precisely the points I made to Boland re the le Bor claims on Srebrenica.
Extra little note for Jewish readers:
Overlap takes place here, please note all Jewish people. The “Red Cross” was proven to be total liars in Srebrenica and in Yugoslavia in general!
Just because something is called “Red Cross” does not mean it tells the truth!
4international 