Please read the above post which comes from that website and via the Zionist Freedom Alliance which is a quite wonderful organization demonstrating the power of the Zionist ideal in the hands of the Jewish youth, an ideal which stands somewhat separate from the thinking of the crusty old Jewish elites especially in the West.


The essence of their point is that the US Government, ruling class, elite, establishment, New World Order (chose your name!) are still intent on grabbing Judea and Samaria and handing it over to the bunch of Arab terrorists known as Fatah and Hamas…


Which is as Robert Spencer of Jihadwatch and Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs continually are pointing out these days…is nothing more or less than the Islam Jihad in action in that particular neck of the woods.


You cannot really, no matter how you might wreck your brains, find a better word or description for this than the “New World Order”.


But the present “left” is not left at all and is linked to Palestinism Antisemitism, and is in alliance with Islam, and with Jihad.


Result as far as the left is concerned is one big headache. The left talk about the “New World Order” but do not totally, or even dare I say at all, understand it.

Iit seems rather obvious to us on that the American and European elites are moving towards outright dictatorship (THEY know that this capitalist crisis is WORSE than the 1929 crash)


But in moving towards this dictatorshnip our revered friends in the CIA, and even in European Intelligence, understand, accept and are working upon, that the best allies which they have in this move to outright dictatorship, may, will, must be, none other than the Muslim Brotherhood.


You doubt me. Ah well, we are just bogging down in the empirical facts that prove this…from Croatia, Bosnia, Kosovo onwards and taking in Libya, Egypt, Yemen, Jordan, Ivory Coast…the list is now scores long.


Just remember that in the capitalist “New World Order” of the future Jerusalem is a big and special prize.


And to cement that Alliance with the Muslim Brothers Fascism there is essentially no place for Jews in Jerusalem.


It all boils down to this very unpalatable fact for many elderly or conservative minded Jews, under a capitalist system sliding towards fascism, a Zionist Jewish state is not possible to maintain.


You have to think anew and one more time about the New Socialist Commonwealth. That is why the revered and reverend Ted Belman of Israpundit just hates to hear the name of Leon Trotsky uttered, and takes quite dramatic action on his site to ensure that it is not uttered.


But out of this acorn a great movement will grow. While Ted will wither without any water in the desert sun.


By Felix Quigley

December 2, 2008

I have just been reading a very interesting and absolutely important website. It is called Isracampus. ( As I scanned down I came across a reference to Stalin’s antisemitism and following the link further discovered a few paragraphs with deadly content.

They are all the product of writers and professors in the Israeli University system, full of hatred for Israel, full of sympathy for the eenmies of Israel, now called “Palestinians” although Palestinian Arabs may be more accurate.

This is the most serious problem. It has been touched on slightly by Gil White. Steven Plaut deals with it continually but in his own way which does not really get to terms with the problem.

Following the link proivided I came on this by one of these writers. I think I show in the following that a little correct historical persepective soon opens up the holes in this writer’s approach.

<blockquote>In its history as well as its nature, Zionism differs significantly from all other nationalist movements.

<em><strong>Is untrue. There are bound to be differences because all national movements have a unique history.</strong></em>

 It is the case, as has been said, of “a government that acquired a state.” From the time of the 1897 founding Congress, the Zionists had a government (the Zionist executive committee).

<em><strong>Rubbish. The Irish in their national liberation struggle first set uip Dail Eireann. So this was not in the slightest different to the Jews. Dail Eireann was set up while the British were in control of the country and had to meet in secret. Also the Irish depended heavily on the American Irish diaspora.</strong></em>

They had a House of Representatives (the Zionist Congress) with a left and a right wing, moderates and extremists, progressives and conservatives, religious and secular parties. (NB The Irish had the same, even a socialist called James Connolly, a romantic poet Padraig Pearce, and then activist national bourgeois types like Griffith, DeValera and Collins, so the above is hot air by this writer) They collected annual taxes (the shekel, whose payment granted the right to vote in the elections of the Zionist Congress). Yet they had no state to govern and no citizens. The Congress was a federation of political parties which shared one common objective – to create a Jewish state in Palestine – yet quarreled on almost every other issue, including the means to achieve this common objective. All this activity was taking place in Europe while the Jewish population in Palestine numbered less than 10 per cent of the Arab population, and had nothing to do with the Zionist movement.

<em><strong>All this is sheer poison. The reason being that the Jews had been expelled and persecuted. That is the main difference with the Irish. The Jews had to be brought back to the place from where they were expelled. The above is an antisemitic theme, ie blaming the victim, the Jew, for the oppressor of the Jew.</strong></em>

Zionism originated in Europe and was a European phenomenon arising out of conditions affecting European Jews. These conditions included: the severe persecution suffered by Jews in Tsarist Russia in the second half of die last century (in the pogroms the Russian Jews were in constant danger of losing not only their livelihood, but their lives) and the obstacles faced by Jews in Western Europe (where their economic conditions were much better) in becoming integrated into non-Jewish society (the Dreyfus Affair converted Herzl from an assimilationist to a Zionist). Ideologically, Zionism was shaped under the impact of nineteenth-century European nationalism, which was the emerging ideology of a wide group of people living in the belt between the Baltic and the Adriatic. Emotionally, it was deeply influenced by the Jewish religion.

<em><strong>Totally weak. Even a school child knows that Zionism, or the wish to return to Zion, is rooted in the Roman expulsions, at least, and what followed, including the brutal Arab Islamist conquest.

Of course Europe mattered. There is always a little truth in what these folk say. But he is wrong on Herzl and Dreyfus. The Diaries make it clear that Dreyfus was not the big factor most historians try to say it was. Rather that Herzl was aware of the great changes caused by the break up of the Austro Hungarian Empire at the turn of the century. These were not issues concerning some thousands as in France but millions of Jews in Central and Eastern Europe, the very foundation platform for the Holocaust was being created. Herzl to his credit saw this. But that in itself was not separate from the previous 2000 years of persecution.</strong></em>
Herzl himself underestimated the strength of the Jewish sentiment toward Palestine.

<em><strong>Yes he did indeed. This is a feature of these writers. Sometimes they make the case for Israel. It is a trick they play often. Some things are incontestible so they just state it then try to blur the significance. But Herzl learned and soon he saw the power of the return to Zion ideal, and the necessity for it.</strong></em>Coming from an assimilationist home, he was unaware of the emotional-political power of the Jewish religion. When he suggested to the Congress that the Jewish state be created in Uganda, he was surprised by the fierceness of the opposition from the majority which refused to accept any substitute, even temporarily, for Palestine. The Zionists

<em><strong>”The Zionists”. The writer could just as well be saying “The Luciferians” it is a cuss word for him. He is doing now what I said above, he is deflecting from the truth he had to state.</strong></em>
considered their rights in Palestine to be incontestable, but they realized that they must either achieve recognition of these rights by some world power or else convince those who happened to be ruling Palestine that the creation of a Jewish state there would be to their benefit.

<em><strong>He is just now lapsing into lies and more lies. The British were opposed to the state of Israel being formed. As was the US ruling class at all points. Just that in the 47 vote Truman probably had to match Kosygin.</strong></em>
[1] Although Palestine was at that time populated by some 700,000 Arabs, the Zionists never bothered to consult them.

<em><strong>More ISM type lies. Not only were they totally consulted but Churchill cut off the 78 per cent to creat Transjordan out of Palestine, as a sop to the Arabs. Hopin gthat the Arabs would then allow the Jews to have about 22 per cent of the original planned a year before at San Remo.</strong></em>

Realistically they could hardly have expected the Palestinian Arabs – who had their own nationalist aspirations – to accept the idea of a Jewish state, especially at a time when Jews constituted such a small percentage of the population. And like any other colonizing movement of that time, Zionism simply did not consider the indigenous population of the colonized country as a political factor to be reckoned with. </blockquote>

<em><strong>Some colonizing movement since they had just lost 78 per cent, and the remaining 22 per cent to be challenged against the Jews as well</strong></em>

<strong>I am afraid that we need an organization which can challenge these folk theoretically as well as politically.

There is a whole narrative being created here which is based on a falsehood. Now the big problem is the absence of a force of a strong mobilizing, educational and combative nature which can begin to educate the key youth in Israel on these isues.

The problem also is that Plaut proceeds as an individual. But no individual can possibly do this. It is not just a matter of words in a university lecture room or in a university magazine.

It is esentially to organize the struggle to defend Israel. A initial step in doing this is to show that Israel is engaged in a serious war for its existence. This means that it is quite impermissible to even try to fight this war against fiece enemies while having such enemies as a Fifth Column, which includes the Israeli Supreme Court as well.

All of these promotors of Israel hatred should be arrested and placed in prison. Not exiled because they would simply carry on. I mean unambiguously jailed.

But my point here is not only jail them, answer them theoretically as well. But do jail them for sure and at once.

You can see from the points that I have made that it is quite easy to answer. But there is a tendency to ignore these traitorous Jewish enemies in the interests of free speech. In conditions of war there is no such thing as allowing the enemy to have free speech. Those of your compatriots, brothers and sisters or whatever term you use, must have total free speech. But your enemy must have no free speech at all. This applies as well to organs of the Media such as Haaretz which some have even called the voice of the Palestinian Arabs.</strong>


Galloway and the Irish anti-Semitic ISM are adding to the injustice


The injustice done to the Jews of Israel of today is seen by looking back to the very origins of the issue in the Middle East. Knowing that the Jews were the most oppressed nation that the world has ever known (and still are just look at the resolutions of Jew and Israel hatred from the United Nations as just one small example of total contemporary anti-Semitism) the League of Nations gathered together post World War 1 wrote the following which is from the official League source


[start quote here]


The text of the mandate stipulates:


Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory

should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people;


Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have selected His Britannic Majesty as the Mandatory for Palestine; …


Article 2.

The Mandatory shall be responsible for placing the country under such

political, administrative and economic conditions as will secure the

establishment of the Jewish national home, as laid down in the preamble, and the development of self-governing institutions, and also for safeguarding the civil and religious rights of all the inhabitants of Palestine, irrespective of race and religion.


Article 4.

An appropriate Jewish agency shall be recognised as a public body for the purpose of advising and co-operating with the Administration of Palestine in such economic, social and other matters as may affect the establishment of the Jewish national home and the interests of the Jewish population in Palestine, and, subject always to the control of the Administration, to assist and take part in the development of the country. The Zionist organisation, so long as its organisation and constitution are in the opinion of the Mandatory appropriate, shall be recognised as such agency. It shall take steps in consultation with His Britannic Majesty’s Government to secure the cooperation of all Jews who are willing to assist in the establishment of the Jewish national home.


Article 5.

The Mandatory shall be responsible for seeing that no Palestine territory shall be ceded or leased to, or in any way placed under the control of, the Government of any foreign Power.

(All readily available from many sources on the Web)



Thus the Principal Powers in the world meeting together and after having won the recent contest between nations decided the above:


  • 1 draws the link with the Balfour Declaration which had rightly given the Jews the space of Palestine for their national home, understanding that this was about 1 500th of the total area that was eventually falling into the lap of the Arabs. Could the Arabs they reasoned not accept the Jews living on 1 500th in a patch of land adjacent to the Sea!?
  • No 2 lays it down that the Mandatory must create that Jewish Homeland. No mention at all about a Arab or Palestinian Homeland. There WAS NO PALESTINIAN PEOPLE THEN. And as I stated the Arabs were being given 500 times more territory e.g. Iraq, Syria. Lebanon etc
  • No 4 makes it very explicit that the Mandatory should proceed and seek all Jews in the world who wish to return to this patch of land to help create that state, remembering again that the Arabs were being given 500 times more. Just a small patch for the Jews. Who would object!?
  • No 5. None of this land to be taken over by anu other power. Not Britain. Not US. Not any Arab state such as Egypt. Not France (Golan) etc etc. This was the land for the Jewish Homeland. THERE WAS NO PALESTINIAN PEOPLE MENTIONED AND FOR A GOOD REASON…THERE WAS NO PALESTINIAN PEOPLE FULL STOP. A later anti-Semitic invention.


When one examines the writings of one George Galloway who sent his message of support to the Irish antisemites of the Irish ISM as they trailed their anti-Semitic coat tails around the beautiful and historical streets of Fair Dublin one sees a total absence of this history.


With Galloway there is no empathy with this ancient and most oppressed of all people, the Jews.


Should Galloway as a socialist not be celebrating that after 2000 years the Jews had a Homeland offered to them by Balfour and the League of Nations, not forgetting Mr Galloway sir that the Arabs were given a fully 500 times more land on which to build their many states, some say as many as 22 states.


As a socialist Galloway. But you see in reality Galloway is THAT KIND OF SOCIALIST ISN’T HE?!



by Felix Quigley

November 25, 2008

The Israeli ruling capitalist and anti Judaic ruling class is now going full pelt ahead to create a Jihadist “Palestinian” Arab state on the land of Israel, specifically on the land of Judea and Samaria. This involves all sections of this traitorous Israeli ruling class which centres on Olmert, Livni and Barak but which also incorporates a section of the Judaic religious hierarchy itself. It is the ultimate betrayal of the Jews and it is being carried out obviously by a large section of the Jewish leadership in Israel. A traitorous betrayal because it is creating an artificial distinction between Hamas and Fatah where in reality there is none. Differences over method yes, but on the issue of the destruction of Israel and the killing of all Jews…none!


In the face of great events the Israeli Judaic ruling class is either leading the betrayal or else it is unable to do anything about it. The only barrier to this betrayal is the Israeli working class people, not the bankers or fast buck merchants of the boom period etc, the ordinary Jewish people, who are going to elect Netanyahu into power in February in a type of Coalition, and who have pledged and indeed must disregard every one of these traitorous moves now being made by Olmert.


Olmert is representative of the Sharon Stasi police and army thugs who dragged Jews out screaming from their homes and towns (not settlements which has a colonist ring to it) and no sooner were they out than the citizens of Israel proper, such as Sderot, were under fire from Hamas and Fatah.


The flunkeys who call themselves Jews and representative of the great Jewish people who centre around USrapundit, that is Israpundit led by flunkey of US in chief Mr Ted Belman, have spent a year in support of the Neocons around George Bush, McCain, Joseph Lieberman the butcher of the Serbs, in a totally pointless US election.


Pointless for Jews because it was the Bush Republican wing of politics who set the ball rolling towards this Palestinian state. It was Bush who had sent Rice on her totally bullying trips into Israel where this Republican gave vent to her hatred for all things Jewish.


Now it is Obama and Malley, plus US Army Man Jones, who is going to finish what Bush and the Republicans started going.


That is precisely what Belman and Levinson spent a year in support of. Given the facilities of a good website, built by others, Belman has wasted every single second of the past 2 years. He and Levinson should be kicked right off the Israpundit site and it should be taken over and run by real Jewish fighters. But in the hands of Belman and Levinson IT REMAINS WHAT WE NOW CALL IN KNOWING CIRCLES USRAPUNDIT.

The dire situation describing the buildup of Jihadist Abbas Nazi forces is described by Israel National News


[start quote here]


( Israel is considering granting permission for the Palestinian Authority to station armed forces in Bethlehem following similar deployments in Jenin, Shechem and Hevron. The PA and Israel call the special forces “police officers,” but they have undergone intensive military training by Americans at bases built for them at Jericho and in Jordan.

The special forces are in effect part of the growing security forces of the PA, which is not allowed to have an official army under existing agreements. However, the PA has sought advanced weapons

What they are creating, that is the US ruling class, the EU, Russia, China, South American Governments such as Chavez, is a Nazi Fatah led regime inside Israel and this will be the exact same as Hamas, full of hate for Israel, using every method to attack Israel.


In the article mentioned above the writer for INN stated that in Bethlehem it was Hamas who drove out the Christian Arabs. Even they are beginning to talk the language of the Israeli traitors. In fact it was not Hamas but Fatah as well. Even INN writers are creating a false distinction between Hamas and Fatah.


That is precisely the type of reasoning which the US is using to create a nazi state in the Middle East, and it is this pervasive ideology which can only be challenged ideologically by a Trotskyist party in Israel.


There must now be a wide and serious discussion of Trotskyism inside Israel.


In the article which 4international published recently in our 10 points we called for the arrest trial and execution of Abbas for the crimes which he has committed and which he has stated he will go on committing centring on the Jihadist use of suicide murderers.


We repeat these now for discussion:

  1. That the ordinary Arab and Muslim people break from their horrific anti-Semitism. Our fight is not with the ordinary people in any way but we are fighting for survival, remember that.
  2. We are a very small nation, of 5 or 6 millions surrounded by half a billion in the Arab nations, more if you include Islamic nations. We cannot afford loss of life. You can afford loss of many lives. That is the equation. Thus it is our aim to have as few of our fighter die and to have as many of your fighters to die.
  3. We will use every advantage. If we have a technological advantage then we will use it. The only condition is as I said above to have as few of our people die as is possible.
  4. We vacated every Jew out of Gaza. Were you grateful? The opposite. You made war on us. Now we will make war on you and we will drive every Arab out of Gaza and into Egypt or whatever Arab country they wish to go to.
  5. To the “international community”. Name your poison! Bring it on! We are totally impervious to any and every statement from the likes of Amnesty International or even the Spanish Government who keep troops in Lebanon but allow Hizbullah to build their forces on their watch. Etc. Etc.
  6. Of course we communicate to the US Government. But we communicate above all and from the beginning to the end to the ordinary American people. We mobilize the wonderful Jewish people in America to communicate with the real America.
  7. In reference to the US Government and the CIA who are training Fatah in order to erect a state in our land, that is the second state in our lands, we call for the arrest of Abbas, for his summary trial and likely execution because he calls for a return to the shahid philosophy of Arafatian suicide bombing of Jews. To Malley, to Obama, to McCain, to Lieberman, we stick to this simple point and we give it maximum publicity in front of the great American people. Not too much to ask for and is doable. Nothing else matters but the arrest of Abbas his trial and execution. That will clear the air. To call for the murder of Jews in 2008 calls for exceptional retribution. Otherwise the Eichmann experience means little.
  8. Read Trotsky above again and learn. Israel is now at war. Israel cannot afford to have a traitor in the ranks. All Jewish traitors in Israel must be arrested and placed under lock and key while this lasts. That means until the enemy is defeated. This means the arrest of those in places like Ben Gurion University who spout hatred of Israel and support for the enemy which is trying to destroy Israel. This applies to all sections of the Israeli state, the police, the judiciary, the press. Read especially what Trotsky writes about taking the Press under control of the state, the state which is organizing the people to defeat the enemy.
  9. None of this is any good if Israel allows Iran to have a nuclear bomb. This has to be incorporated.
  10. I support the Israeli people electing Netanyahu. But to fight this war requires revolutionaries who will not flinch, whether they come from the religious or secular Trotskyist conviction. But it requires cadre leaders who will put only the interests of this tiny state and people first. Act! Let the nations of the world decide for themselves how they react! Believe in your destiny! Banish fear!



by Felix Quigley

November 12, 2008

These are some facts or details that may not be known.


  1. There was not always, or perhaps closer to say ever, a Palestinian people
  2. The area which became Palestine was inhabited by the Jews the oldest nation ever
  3. The name of Palestinians was given to Arabs as a result of their failure in wars to destroy the Jews.
  4. There is a huge Nazi cum British and US Imperialist input to this process…the creation of this mystical people “The Palestinians”.
  5. We on 4international have documented precisely when and how this happened. Post 1945 the Nazis were recruited into the American state machine. This included the greatest Nazi criminal of all, easily the equal of Hitler, an Arab from this Palestinian area, his name Hajj Amin el Husseini, also called the Mufti of Jerusalem
  6. Leon Trotsky supported the Jews as a nation, and called on the Jews to set up their national home in Palestine, called for it to be defended by any and every means against Fascists. He saw what he called as “reactionary Mohammedans” as precisely that, a peculiar form of Nazism


These series of articles, historical in nature will give a new slant to the issue. We wish to separate ourselves from a number of tendencies. 1. Those on the Left like Chomsky who hate Israel and are opposed to the positions of Trotsky alluded to above. 2. Those Jewish leaders like Belman of Israpundit who link the fate of the Jews and Israel to the US ruling class whether democratic or republican, because it is this US (and European) ruling class which post 1945 joined Gehlen, Husseini and the Nazi Holocaust executioners


Our motto is undying opposition to all those capitalist classes and their state who all had a direct hand in the Holocaust of the Jews by the Nazis through their silence and cooperation with the Nazis. This includes the Irish capitalist class north and south.


We use many sources of information for these articles especially work by Joseph Alexander Norland, by Francisco Gil White and by Jared Israel even though in using their research does not imply political agreement. At the end of the articles we will publish comprehensive details of sources.

Jews’ ancestral land

  1. Palestine belongs to the Jews as their ancestral land, a land inhabited by Jews continuously for thousands of years. The Jewish connection to Palestine was recognized by the “International Community” in the form of the League of Nations’ mandate over Palestine.



This statement appears repeatedly in advocacy articles written from a pro-Israeli viewpoint, an example being quoted below. The statement is also corroborated by authoritative historians, but these works are not available on the web.



On the other hand, it is easy to establish and document definitively that the “international community” has accepted the Jewish historical claim to Palestine, and consequently the claim of the Jewish people to a national home in Palestine. To substantiate this statement, I quote from the preamble to the text of the League of Nations Mandate:


“Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country ; and

Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country…”

(The text quoted above may be found on many web sites; we selected to quote from the site of Yale Law School).




Among the parties present at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, were Felix Frankfurter and Chaim Weizmann on behalf of the Zionist movement, and the Emir Feisal on behalf of the Hedjaz (now Saudi Arabia). In the course of their meetings, Feisal wrote a letter addressed to Frankfurter and dated 3 March, 1919. The letter, which may be found at





Unless Feisal himself recognized the Jewish historical claim to Palestine, there would be no meaning to the sentence, “we will wish the Jews a most hearty welcome home”. Hence it is clear that the Jewish claim to Palestine was already well established even among the Arabs, when the League of Nations granted the British a mandate over Palestine on July 24, 1922.




As an example of the many web sites which deal with the Jewish connection to Palestine I quote from


In 135 CE, after having long-become a province of the Roman Empire,

Judea‘s third and last revolt against Rome was crushed by Emperor Hadrian; but Rome’s army also suffered devastating losses, including the complete annihilation of its illustrious XXII Legion. In furtherance of Rome’s costly victory, Hadrian — in a blatant propaganda effort to delegitimize further national Jewish claims to the Land — renamed the province Palestina (Palestine) after the Philistines, a long-extinct Aegean people who had disappeared from History approximately a millennium earlier.

However, although the province had been converted from Judea (– Land of the Jews –) into Palestina (– Land of the Philistines –), it continued to be populated by Jews, together with substantial minority populations of Christians and Samaritans, but hardly any Arabs, at least until the great Arab invasion of 638 CE, as a result of which, 73 years later, Byzantium’s Christian basilica known as the Church of Saint Mary of Justinian, which then sat atop Jerusalem’s Temple Mount, was remade into Islam’s Al-Aksa mosque. But even under the rule of the Arab and all subsequently superseding empires, the Jewish people nevertheless maintained a continuous national presence in “Palestine” — right up until the resurrection therein of the Jewish nation-state of Israel in 1948 CE.”


League of Nations Mandate for Jewish National



With Britain accepting the mandate over Palestine, subject to the conditions of the League of Nations, Britain committed herself to establishing the Jewish National Home in Palestine by encouraging Jewish immigration and settlement.






We reproduce some of the articles of the League of nations mandate.


To establish the validity of this statement, suffice it to quote the relevant passages from the text of the League of Nations’ mandate; the source, as previously, is the Yale Law School; bold font inserted by me.


The text of the mandate stipulates:


Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory

should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people;


Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have selected His Britannic Majesty as the Mandatory for Palestine; …


Article 2.

The Mandatory shall be responsible for placing the country under such

political, administrative and economic conditions as will secure the

establishment of the Jewish national home, as laid down in the preamble, and the development of self-governing institutions, and also for safeguarding the civil and religious rights of all the inhabitants of Palestine, irrespective of race and religion.


Article 4.

An appropriate Jewish agency shall be recognised as a public body for the purpose of advising and co-operating with the Administration of Palestine in such economic, social and other matters as may affect the establishment of the Jewish national home and the interests of the Jewish population in Palestine, and, subject always to the control of the Administration, to assist and take part in the development of the country. The Zionist organisation, so long as its organisation and constitution are in the opinion of the Mandatory appropriate, shall be recognised as such agency. It shall take steps in consultation with His Britannic Majesty’s Government to secure the cooperation of all Jews who are willing to assist in the establishment of the Jewish national home.


Article 5.

The Mandatory shall be responsible for seeing that no Palestine territory shall be ceded or leased to, or in any way placed under the control of, the Government of any foreign Power


Article 6.

The Administration of Palestine, while ensuring that the rights and

position of other sections of the population are not prejudiced, shall

facilitate Jewish immigration under suitable conditions and shall

encourage, in co-operation with the Jewish agency. referred to in Article 4, close settlement by Jews, on the land, including State lands and waste lands not required for public purposes.




Clearly, the Jewish claim on Palestine is not only recognized, but specific measures are stipulated as to how to ensure that the right is transformed into a reality, especially with regard to immigration, settlement and soliciting help from world Jewry. In contrast, there is no reference whatever to political rights of any other group, such as Arabs. In fact, in the entire mandate text there is no reference to “Palestinians”, only to “non Jews”.


Of course, the “International community” was well aware of non-Jewish residents in Palestine, and, indeed, ensured that their “civil and religious rights” be enshrined in the text but no political rights, such as sovereigny, are mentioned.




It was not deemed unjust to expect the Arabs to accept a Jewish National Home in a tiny corner of the Middle East, when huge Arab lands had just been liberated by the Allies from the Ottoman yoke, and when three new Arab kingdoms (Iraq, Transjordan and Saudi Arabia) were in the process of being born. This point of “injustice” was addressed many times by Churchill, Balfour and Col. Richard Meinertzhagen.


The bottom line regarding this point is that the “international community” and Britain in particular undertook the creation of a Jewish National Home in Palestine, and hence there is no justification for creating a second Palestinian-Arab state on part of this land.

The mandatory power, Britain, betrayed her mandate by slicing off the majority of the territory allotted to the Jews by the League of Nations; the Jewish people should not now be required to relinquish sovereignty over more territory.



(Jews have lost most of Palestine already)


(I will add these maps later…fq)








The entire story of Britain chipping away at the Jewish National Home is told by a map showing the 1920, 1921 and 1923 borders of Palestine. This map has been reproduced in web sites and in history books numerous times. For example, the Palestinian Academic Society for the Study of International Affairs, or PASSIA, runs a site with numerous maps relevant to Palestine politics. Using this site, one can find an annotated map showing the boundaries of mandatory Palestine. (PASSIA is “an Arab non-profit institution located in Jerusalem/Al-Quds with a financially and legally independent status.

It is not affiliated with any government, political party or organization”.)

The same map is also reproduced in Martin Gilbert, p. 623 .



(Transjordania is excluded)


After WW I, the major powers at the 1919 Peace Conference in Paris agreed on granting the mandate over Palestine to Britain, along the lines of the Balfour Declaration of November 2, 1917 (Martin Gilbert, p. 42). The details were fleshed out in the San Remo Conference, April 1920, where the boundaries of Palestine were outlined to include contemporary Israel, Judea, Samaria, Gaza, Jordan and the Golan Heights.


The political events in 1919-1920 that are relevant to this article include the crowning of the Emir Feisal of Hedjaz as King of Syria and his ouster by force at the hands of the French army that occupied Syria and Lebanon in July 1920 (shortly after the San Remo Conference). As a result, Faisal’s younger brother, Abdullah, made his way to contemporary Jordan at the head of a small band of fighters to help Faisal. Contemporaneously, the Palestinian Arabs had become vocal in their

opposition to the Zionist project.


Thus, at the Cairo Conference of March 1921, Churchill took another step in a long series of attempts to appease the Arabs: the east bank of Palestine was delivered to Abdullah as his future kingdom, together with a hefty subsidy (i.e., bribe), and the area was excluded from the Jewish National Home. In return, Abdullah gave up the attempt to reinstall his brother as king of Syria. This exclusion of “Transjordania” from the Jewish National Home was enshrined in the mandate given by the League of Nations to Britain on July 24, 1922.


(Later –  Britain’s useless attempts to appease the Palestinian-Arabs and the consequent emboldening of the Palestinian-Arab terrorists which ultimately backfired on the British



The exclusion of the east bank removed 78% of the total area allocated to the Jewish National Home by the League of Nations at San Remo.




In 1923, the Golan was ceded by Britain to France, the mandatory power over Syria and Lebanon. The circumstances under which this chunk of land was lopped off the Jewish National Home is explained in an article posted by Camera, as follows:


Having discovered the Golan lacks oil but that the Mosul area in northern Syria is rich in oil, the British cede the Golan to France in return for Mosul. Traditionally Mosul was part of Syria while the Golan was part of the Galilee. In return for the Golan, France relinquishes any claim to Palestine.


It is unclear how this act was reconciled with the League of Nations mandate which stipulated quite explicitly in Article 5:


Article 5.

The Mandatory shall be responsible for seeing that no Palestine territory shall be ceded or leased to, or in any way placed under the control of, the Government of any foreign Power.




It should be noted, finally, that the famous “Resolution 242” refers clearly to “the principle” of “withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict”. There is no reference to withdrawing from all the territories, and as explained by the architects of the resolution, that was not the intention in the first place. Since Israel returned most of the territory occupied in the course of the 1967 War, namely, Sinai, as part of the 1979 peace agreement with Egypt, Israel is quite right in placing the stamp of “Enough is Enough” on any further withdrawals. The issue of Resolution 242 will be dealt with separately in greater detail in a forthcoming article.


To summarize, the Jewish National Home has already been reduced in size, and there is no justification for any further reduction, especially one designed to create a 23rd Arab state (which   would also be the second Palestinian-Arab state).


Reference: Some of the historical data were culled from of the tome written by the famous British historian, Sir Martin Gilbert:


Gilbert, Martin. Israel. New York: William Morrow & Co., Inc, 1998.

Where Martin Gilbert is quoted, the relevant page is noted.




(By a good writer called David Singer)



Palestine: Partition and Propaganda
David Singer – 6/24/2007
President Bush and Israel’s Prime Minister Ehud Olmert stubbornly and foolishly continue to push for the creation of an independent Palestinian State between Israel and Jordan, as Hamas and Fatah turn the proposed site for such a state – Gaza and the West Bank – into battlegrounds of blood, misery and privation for the Arab populations caught in their deadly crossfire.

The 70th Anniversary of the Peel Commission Report released on 7 July 1937 presents a unique and impartial insight into understanding what the so called “Palestinian problem” was – and still is today – really about.

The Peel Commission recognised there was an insoluble conflict in Palestine between the Arabs and Jews necessitating the partition of Palestine into two independent sovereign states.

There was no mention of a third interested party – the “Palestinians” or “the Palestinian people” – who also deserved a separate state. This “people” was the subsequent creation of skilful Arab propaganda in the 50’s and 60’s in response to Israel’s creation in 1948.

The Peel Commission Report succinctly summed up the nature of the conflict in the following words:

“An irrepressible conflict has arisen between two national communities within the narrow bounds of one small country. There is no common ground between them. Their national aspirations are incompatible. The Arabs desire to revive the traditions of the Arab golden age. The Jews desire to show what they can achieve when restored to the land in which the Jewish nation was born. Neither of the two national ideals permits of combination in the service of a single State.”

In 1937 there was no independent State called Jordan. It was then called Trans-Jordan, it comprised 77% of the territory administered by Great Britain under the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine – the operation of which was specifically the subject of inquiry and consideration by the Peel Commission.

The right of Jews to settle in Trans-jordan pursuant to the Mandate had been “postponed or withheld” by Britain with the consent of the League of Nations from 16 September 1922 thus restricting the right of the Jews to reconstitute their national homeland in only the remaining 23% of Palestine.

The Peel Report records that:

“The articles of the Mandate concerning the [Jewish] National Home do not apply to Trans-Jordan and the possibility of enlarging the National Home by Jewish immigration into Trans-Jordan rests on the assumption of concord between Arabs and Jews.”

That concord never eventuated and Trans-Jordan remained an exclusively Arab reserved territory in 77% of Palestine – free of any Jewish settlement – until independence was granted by Great Britain in 1946 with the approval of the League of Nations at its last sitting before dissolution. No Jew resides there today.

The Peel Commission proposed partition into two independent Arab and Jewish sovereign States.

The Arab State was to be in all of Trans-Jordan – where no Jews and an estimated 300000 Arabs lived – united with a further part of Palestine in which only about 1250 Jews lived among about 750000 Arabs. This would have given the Arabs a sovereign State in about 90% of the territory of the Mandate.

The remaining 10% was to become the sovereign Jewish State where about 400000 Jews and 225000 Arabs then lived, whilst a new Mandate was to be enacted “for the protection of the Holy Places, solemnly guaranteed by the League of Nations, to remove all anxiety lest the Holy Places should ever come under Jewish control.”

Transfer of the minority population in each State was also proposed to follow the precedent set by the exchange between the Greek and Turkish populations following the Greco-Turkish War of 1922.

The Peel Report noted:

“There was a time when Arab statesmen were willing to concede little Palestine to the Jews, provided that the rest of Arab Asia were free. That condition was not fulfilled then, but it is on the eve of fulfilment now. In less than three years’ time all the wide Arab area outside Palestine between the Mediterranean and the Indian Ocean will be independent, and, if Partition is adopted, the greater part of Palestine will be independent too. ”

The Report stated the advantages to the Arabs and the Jews of Partition in the following terms:

“The advantages to the Arabs of Partition on the lines we have proposed may be summarized as follows:–

(i) They obtain their national independence and can co-operate on an equal footing with the Arabs of the neighbouring countries in the cause of Arab unity and progress.

(ii) They are finally delivered from the fear of being swamped by the Jews, and from the possibility of ultimate subjection to Jewish rule.”

“The advantages of Partition to the Jews may be summarized as follows:–

(i) Partition secures the establishment of the Jewish National Home and relieves it from the possibility of its being subjected in the future to Arab rule.

(ii) Partition enables the Jews in the fullest sense to call their National Home their own; for it converts it into a Jewish State. Its citizens will be able to admit as many Jews into it as they themselves believe can be absorbed. They will attain the primary objective of Zionism–a Jewish nation, planted in Palestine, giving its nationals the same status in the world as other nations give theirs. They will cease at last to live a minority life.”

The Arabs rejected the proposal and therein sowed the seeds for the continuation of the conflict that still remains unresolved in 2007 in just the West Bank and Gaza – only 6% of Palestine – where sovereignty still remains unallocated between Arabs and Jews .

President Bush and Mr Olmert need to recognise that the proposal to create a State between Israel and Jordan – the product of the totally discredited 1993 Oslo Process – has turned out to be a dismal failure and that it flies in the face of the conflict and its history, geography and demography.

Looking back 70 years can be the catalyst and inspiration for a new direction in 2007 which consigns the idea of a third State in former Palestine to the garbage bin and substitutes for it the partition of the West Bank between Jordan and Israel to finally complete what the Peel Commission had recommended.

Failure to change course will have only two assured outcomes – continued death and suffering for both Jews and Arabs and a continuing threat to world peace.

David Singer is an Australian Lawyer and Convenor of Jordan is Palestine International — an organization calling for sovereignty of the West Bank and Gaza to be allocated between Israel and Jordan as the two successor States to the Mandate for Palestine.



Jews developed desolate, empty land

The Jews have established their right to the land, inter alia, by developing a desolate, barren, virtually abandoned territory into a flourishing country.


For July, 2001, the CIA fact book gives the following population figures (in millions): Israel – 5.9; “West Bank” – 2.1. Thus, the total population in the area of Palestine that corresponds to Israel, Judea, Samaria and Gaza is approximately 8 million.


But on the eve of the 1880’s Jewish immigration to Palestine, the country was both desolate and virtually empty. While the population figures until the 1922 Census are estimates, they will suffice to support this thesis.




The following data are quoted from Palestinian sources, so that the argument of pro-Zionist bias cannot be raised. Specifically, the 1860 and 1890 estimates may be found in Palestine Remembered, while the 1922 Census data are cited from the official Palestinian site. The area concerned corresponds to contemporary Israel, Judea, Samaria and Gaza:


Total population in Palestine, in 1,000s: 1860 – 411; 1890 – 553; 1922 – 752.


Thus, forty years after the 1880’s Jewish migration to Palestine and the consequent Arab migration, the country still held less than 10% of its current population.


The fact that Palestine was desolate and empty even as late as the early 1920’s is further substantiated by the reports submitted by the British High Commissioner to the League of Nations. The following quotations are taken from the UNISPAL site, UNISPAL being the propaganda vector which the UN created specifically to support the Palestinian-Arab propaganda machine. (Surprisingly, I have not seen this material cited in any of the published books on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.)




In his first report for the period July 1920 to June 1921, the British High Commissioner reported to the League of Nations as follows:


It is obvious to every passing traveller, and well-known to every European resident, that the country was before the War, and is now, undeveloped and under-populated. The methods of agriculture are, for the most part, primitive; the area of land now cultivated could yield a far greater product. There are in addition large cultivable areas that are left untilled. The summits and slopes of the hills are admirably suited to the growth of trees, but there are no forests. Miles of sand dunes that could be redeemed, are untouched, a danger, by their encroachment, to the neighbouring tillage. The Jordan and the Yarmuk offer an abundance of water-power; but it is unused. Some industries–fishing and the culture and manufacture of tobacco are examples–have been killed by Turkish laws; none have been encouraged; the markets of Palestine and of the neighbouring countries are supplied almost wholly from Europe. The seaborne commerce, such as it is, is loaded and discharged in the open roadsteads of Jaffa and Haifa: there are no harbours. The religious and historical associations that offer most powerful attractions to the whole of the Western, and to a large part of the Eastern world, have hitherto brought to Palestine but a fraction of the pilgrims and travellers, who, under better conditions, would flock to her sacred shrines and famous sites.


The country is under-populated because of this lack of development. There are now in the whole of Palestine hardly 700,000 people, a population much less than that of the province of Gallilee alone in the time of Christ.


As to the contribution of the Jewish population since the 1880’s migrations, the report notes:


After the persecutions in Russia forty years ago, the movement of the Jews  to Palestine assumed larger proportions. Jewish agricultural colonies were founded. They developed the culture of oranges and gave importance to the Jaffa orange trade. They cultivated the vine, and manufactured and exported wine. They drained swamps. They planted eucalyptus trees. They practised, with modern methods, all the processes of agriculture. There are at the present time 64 of these settlements, large and small, with a population of some 15,000. Every traveller in Palestine who visits them is impressed by the contrast between these pleasant villages, with the beautiful stretches of prosperous cultivation about them and the primitive conditions of life and work by which they are surrounded.




The spectacular manner and pace with which the immigrating Jews developed the country may be judged, inter alia, from the following passage, cited from the 1924 report of British High Commissioner to the League of Nations:


Industrial development has been stimulated by the arrival, among the

Jewish immigrants, of a considerable number of men with manufacturing

experience, and with capital. The majority of them come from Poland. They have established a number of new industries, mostly at present on a small scale, the greater number in the Jewish town of Tel-Aviv, adjacent to Jaffa. In addition, several large Jewish enterprises have been founded, and have either reached, or are about to reach, the producing stage. The most important of these enterprises are a cement factory, with an invested capital of £E.300,000; a flour mill, a vegetable oil and soap factory, and a factory of silicate bricks (made of cement and lime), each involving an expenditure of £E.100,000 or more; and, on a smaller scale, works at Athlit, on the coast, for the production of salt by evaporation, a silk factory and a tannery. The electric power station, with fuel engines, erected at Tel-Aviv under the concession granted to Mr. Rutenberg, has been obliged, after only a year’s working, to instal new engines, more than doubling its original capacity. Similar stations are in course of erection at Haifa and at Tiberias, to supply urgent demands for power and lighting there. The construction of the first hydraulic power station on the Jordan has not yet begun, but the preliminary measures have made further progress.

Jewish agricultural colonisation continues steadily. The extensive swamps of Kabbara, in the Maritime Plain, are being drained and brought under cultivation, in accordance with a concession granted to the Palestine Jewish Colonisation Association; the difficulties which had arisen in connection with the claims of about 170 Arab families resident on part of the land having been settled after prolonged negotiations. The town of Tel-Aviv is expanding with remarkable rapidity. The population, which was about 2,500 in 1920, is now estimated at over 25,000, and for some time past new houses have been completed at an average rate of two a day. There is much building activity also in Haifa and Jerusalem and their suburbs. The Bio-Chemical Faculty, and the Institute of Jewish Studies, of the

Hebrew University at Jerusalem have been inaugurated.






Together with economic development came the entrenchment of democratic political institutions, as the Peel Commission underscored in its 1937 report:


The Jewish National Home is no longer an experiment. The growth of its

population has been accompanied by political, social and economic

developments along the lines laid down at the outset. The chief novelty is the urban and industrial development. The contrast between the modern democratic and primarily European character of the National Home and that of the Arab world around it is striking. The temper of the Home is strongly nationalist. There can be no question of fusion or assimilation between Jewish and Arab cultures.




As to the contribution of the Jewish development to the Palestinian-Arab population, the report states:


The Arab population shows a remarkable increase since 1920, and it has had some share in the increased prosperity of Palestine. Many Arab landowners have benefited from the sale of land and the profitable investment of the purchase money. The fellaheen are better off on the whole than they were in 1920. This Arab progress has been partly due to the import of Jewish capital into Palestine and other factors associated with the growth of the National Home. In particular, the Arabs have benefited from social services which could not have been provided on the existing scale without the revenue obtained from the Jews.




The Arab claims that the Jews have obtained too large a proportion of good land cannot be maintained. Much of the land now carrying orange groves was sand dunes or swamps and uncultivated when it was bought.

The Jews contribute more per capita to the revenues of Palestine than the Arabs, and the Government has thereby been enabled to maintain public services for the Arabs at a higher level than would otherwise have been possible.




The Arabs let this land go to wreck and ruin.


The fact that prior to the Jewish migration, Palestine was virtually empty and desolate is also supported by numerous accounts provided by travellers, archaeologists and diplomats of the 18th and 19th Centuries. A list of these may be found, inter alia, on the pro-Israeli Web site of EretzYisroel as well as on pp 41-44 of:

Netnyahu, Benjamin. Durable Peace. New York: Warner Books, 2000.


Of all the travellers’ accounts, the best known is Mark Twain’s journalistic report of his 1867 tour of Palestine and other countries. Unlike the other accounts mentioned, which are virtually inaccessible to the average reader, Mark Twain’s book is on the shelves of many a public library. Following are a few quotations from:


From Mark Twain. The Innocents Abroad. Pleasantville (NY): Readers Digest, 1990 (first published 1869).432 pp.


There is not a solitary village throughout its [the valley at the foot of Mount Tabor] whole extent – not for thirty miles in either direction.


There are two or three small clusters of Beduin tents, but not a single

permanent habitation. One may ride ten miles hereabouts and not see ten

human beings. (P. 311)


The further we went [on the way from Samaria to Jerusalem] the hotter the sun got and the more rocky and bare, repulsive and dreary the landscape became. There could not have been more fragments of stone strewn broadcast over this part of the world if every ten square feet of the land had been occupied by a separate and distinct stonecutter’s establishment for an age. There was hardly a tree or a shrub anywhere. Even the olive and the cactus, those fast friends of a worthless soil, had almost deserted the country. No landscape exists that is more tiresome to the eye than that which bounds the approaches to Jerusalem… (P. 358)


Of all the lands there are for dismal scenery, I think Palestine must be the prince. The hills are barren, they are dull of color, they are

unpicturesque in shape. The valleys are unsightly deserts fringed with a feeble vegetation that has an expression about it of being sorrowful and despondent. The Dead Sea and the Sea of Galilee sleep in the midst of a vast stretch of hill and plain wherein the eye rests upon no pleasant tint, no striking object, no soft picture dreaming in a purple haze or mottled with the shadows of the clouds. Every outline is harsh, every feature is distinct, there is no perspective–distance works no

enchantment here. It is a hopeless, dreary, heartbroken land.


Small shreds and patches of it must be very beautiful in the full flush of spring, however, and all the more beautiful by contrast with the farreaching desolation that surrounds them on every side. I would like much to see the fringes of the Jordan in springtime, and Shechem, Esdraelon, Ajalon, and the borders of Galilee but even then these spots would seem mere toy gardens set at wide intervals in the waste of a limitless desolation.




Palestine sits in sackcloth and ashes. Over it broods the spell of a curse that has withered its fields and fettered its energies. Where Sodom and Gomorrah reared their domes and towers, that solemn sea now floods the plain, in whose bitter waters no living thing exists – over whose waveless surface the blistering air hangs motionless and dead – about whose borders nothing grows but seeds, and scattering tufts of cane, and that treacherous fruit that promises refreshment to parching lips, but turns to ashes at the touch.


Nazareth is forlorn


Nazareth is forlorn; about that ford of Jordan where the hosts of Israel entered the Promised Land with songs of rejoicing, one finds only a squalid camp of fantastic Bedouins of the desert; Jericho the accursed lies a moldering ruin today, even as Joshua’s miracle left it more than three thousand years ago; Bethlehem and Bethany, in their poverty and their humiliation, have nothing about them now to remind one that they once knew the high honor of the Saviour’s presence; the hallowed spot where the shepherds watched their flocks by night, and where the angels sang, “Peace on earth, good will to men,” is untenanted by any living creature and unblessed by any feature that is pleasant to the eye.


JERUSALEM A PAUPER VILLAGE (Fits with later Karl Marx visit and report on Jerusalem)


Renowned Jerusalem itself, the stateliest name in history, has lost all

its ancient grandeur and is become a pauper village… Palestine is

desolate and unlovely… (P. 394-5)




(I will add a link to a separate article on this, such is its importance)




What has all this to do with the Jewish claim to Palestine and the question of a second Palestinian- Arab state in Judea, Samaria and Gaza?


The connection is this: the Palestinian-Arab population might have had a claim of equal validity to that of the Jews, had they populated and developed the land. But in fact, during the occupation of Palestine by the Ottoman Empire, the Palestinian Arabs left the country unpopulated and desolate, relative to its potential. The Jews, on the other hand, had a historical claims and international backing to their claim and proceeded to realize the potential of the land by settling and developing it.







by Felix Quigley

October 28, 2008

Look down the list of entries on the website Israpundit. Out of say 40 there are about 3 or 4 to do with Israel. The rest are part of a campaign to elect McCain and are devoted to attacks on Obama.

Yet this is a site which is run by a Jewish man Ted Belman under cover of being a Jewish advocacy site. On Belman’s site trundles people like Yamit82 whose favourite method of debate is not to answer political points but to quote at you large lumps of scripture.

The Israpundit site is totally besotted by the US election between McCain and Obama, between Republican Party and Democratic Party. Continue reading


By Felix Quigley

October 29, 2008

I believe very firmly that Israpundit and editor Ted Belman are carrying though a betrayal of the Jewish people. Hear that Belman. I know you do read this blog but you are taking that most cowardly path, ignoring our point of view. Why? Essentially because you are an opportunist and the land of ideas is not really for you.

In the latest today on your site following somebody called Glenn Beck you are calling Obama a Marxist. Also Beck is saying that Obama is a Fascist or will become a Fascist.

This is to so muddy the waters Belman. US Imperialism is certainly driven towards Fascist forms of rule by the crisis in capitalism but it is the system of which Obama AND McCain are a part that is decisive.

You are a total opportunist and a disgrace to the great intellectual tradition of the Jewish people.

There are two people running in this election, McCain and Biden, who we have proved lined up behind the Fascists in Croatia led by Tudjman and the Fascists in Bosnia led by Islamist Izetbegovic. Obama was not directly involved but there is no doubt hat he would take exactly the same position.

Both Democratic Obama and Republican McCain are exactly the same.

Then there was the Georgian attack on South Ossetia in which the populist and near Fascist Saakashvili launched a vile atack on the capital of that tiny place which resulted in the destruction of the Jewish Quarter.

Belman you entertain on your site people like Yamit82, Levinson and Narvey who supported the Saakashvili attack on South Ossetia.

That was very close to the methods of a Fascist dictator like Hitler.

We have said time and time again Belman that you are betraying the Jews of Israel by your continuous support for McCain and your not pointing out that McCain and Biden along with Lieberman were up to their neck in the support of Fascist Croatia, Islamofascist Bosnia and the terrorist KLA.

What you are doing in this election is a betrayal of all principle. At one time you were sucking up to pro-Serb advocates like Julia Gorin and Bokababe. Now by your support for McCain, by your deliberate hiding of the role of McCain and his future role, you are betraying the Serbs and YOU ARE A DISGRACE TO THE GREAT JEWISH TRADITION

Shame on Israpundit. Shame also on its founder Josepher Alexander Norland for his silence on this betrayal.

What say you Belman to these simple points?


by Felix Quigley

September 5, 2008

Using their archives I researched the articles printed by The Irish Times on Srebrenica. This ran into the several hundreds. The number of passing comments into thousands. All bar none accepted the wisdom that 8000 men and boys of Muslim persuasion were murdered by the Serb army at Srebrenica.

The number of such articles by the total world Media must be in the millions. Yet it is a lie. There has never been such a situation that Humanity has ever faced before.

The reasons for the savage attacks on Serbs and on Yugoslavia can be found in the urgent needs for NATO to expand into former Soviet satellites, to surround Russia and China, the aim being war.

For the EU the reasons to destroy the old Yugoslavia was the expansion of the EU. The Serbs of Milosevic stood in the way of this.

Most Jewish people in Israel should have little difficulty in understanding the hoax that was Srebrenica. There have been very many similar in their experience.

Some we can immediately name are, the Dir Yassin “Masacre”, Qana, Jenin, El Durra, the Gaza Beach Bombing and others. Politics via massacre hoax propaganda has become common.

So when about one month after the date of the supposed massacre Madeleine Albright showed to the Media and UN two pictures, one before and one after, of land near Srebrenica (supposedly), and which was supposed to be a mass grave…what to make of it! Continue reading


By Felix Quigley

August 31, 2008

Deceiving the World with Pictures

This photo was first published by the Reuters as an image of a “dead woman being carried by the Georgian soldiers from the town of Gori”. But this “dead woman”, incredibly, is clutching the nurse’s arm.

This man exhibiting rage and grief happens to sit in the exact same place where the earlier picture was taken: the same pile of garbage is behind his back and scraps of metal from the picture of a “dead” woman being ‘rescued’ are lying around like in the earlier photo — plus some, additional, unidentified scraps of metal. What are these supposed to represent
Since when did a dead person when being carried hold on to the carrier!!!???
Now that is a mystery which only Reuters can tell us about.
I have looked extremely closely at these two photographs, and especially at the piece of scrap metal marked 1.
This scrap metal is precisely the same piece of scrap metal and it appears in both pictures. I have even looked at the serrated underside edge and you can see that this is precisely the same piece of metal.
So therefore what you have here are actors in operation and the scene brought to my mind so many things we have experienced over recent years. Here are some:
1. The El Dhurra France 2 image of the man and boy behind the barrel and the fakery of the boy Mohammed el Dhurra being killed by the Israelis. That was a fake, fake journalism and fake photography.
2. The Qana issue.
EUReferendum commented on this piece of Media skullduggery:  I have called this post, “the director’s cut”, as that is what it is. The narrative here is of how the combination of Hezbollah’s media management and modern photo-journalism has turned the recording of a tragic event into theatre, in the best tradition of Michael Moore.
In the use of staged photography this whole thing took the proverbial biscuit. Starring roles in pinning a massacre on the Israelis were take by Mr White tee shirt man and Mr Green Helmet man, here also sporting the orange glow jacket. These were actors who in the ruined building of Qana appeared here, there and everywhere. These actors were under the direction of Hizbullah and Palestinian and Arab photographers were performing on behalf of the Western Media outlets.
If you think we are not serious then check out the best pictures on this on
Best described in this Wikipedia entry which in this case is factual
Palestinian sources described the events as “the Jenin massacre,” and international media and human rights organizations expressed concerns that a massacre had taken place.Subsequent Israeli investigations found no evidence to substantiate these charges; these were later substantiated by international human rights organizations such as Human Rights Watch. The Palestinian death toll was estimated at 52 in early May 2002, while 23 Israeli soldiers were killed, and it was determined that a massacre had not occurred. Palestinian officials counted 56 deaths.[10]

Despite new findings following the battle, including a decrease in the official death toll, most Palestinians and most Arabs continue to call the events of April 2002 a massacre.[11]

(The antisemitic Arabs had been claiming thousands murdered. The figures above tell all about Media lies…FQ)

(The following is from BBC News of two days ago, August 29…FQ)


Pictures ‘show Georgia torching’


One of the satellite images (Courtesy of Human Rights Watch)

Satellite images have confirmed that ethnic Georgian villages inside South Ossetia have been deliberately burned, US-based Human Rights Watch says.

It said analysis by UN experts showed the damage “was caused by intentional burning and not armed combat”.

HRW researchers had “personally witnessed Ossetian militias looting and burning down ethnic Georgian villages”.

The group said this was evidence of war crimes and urged Russia to prosecute those responsible.


And so it goes on. This reminds one of Madeleine Albright who claimed that the Serbs had committed a massacre in Srebrenica and showed satellite pictures of a mass grave. The pictures showed nothing of the kind and the US never allowed those pictures be examined by an independent authority much less than by those she was accusing of atrocity, the Serbs.

In this business of spreading lies he who gets in the first shot, of lying that is, is on the winning ticket.

Following the jest by Mark Twain

“A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.”

And so it is with this propaganda put about by this extremely dubious outfit, funded by millionaire Mr George Soros, Human Rights Watch.


They do continue:

10 August, Human Rights Watch said.

“The images strongly indicate that the majority of the destruction in five of the villages – Tamarasheni, Kekhvi, Kvemo Achabeti, Zemo Achabeti, and Kurta – was caused by intentional burning.

“The high-resolution images of these villages show no impact craters from incoming shelling or rocket fire, or aerial bombardment.”

All of this adds up to compelling evidence of war crimes
Rachel Denber
HRW deputy director, Europe and Central Asia

The images were analysed by UN experts in Geneva, Human Rights Watch said.

“The expert analysis indicates clear patterns of destruction that are consistent with the evidence gathered by Human Rights Watch researchers working in the region,” the human rights group said.

The researchers had spoken to several members of the Ossetian militias who “openly admitted that the houses were being burned by their associates, explaining that the objective was to ensure that ethnic Georgians would not have the houses to return to,” it said.

“All of this adds up to compelling evidence of war crimes and grave human rights abuses,” said Rachel Denber, deputy director of the Europe and Central Asia division of Human Rights Watch.

“This should persuade the Russian government it needs to prosecute those responsible for these crimes.”

And so we move along and now the same thing is beginning to happen as happened following the retaking of Srebrenica by the Serbs in 1995.

1. Those who were there, especially the Dutch UN soldiers, were clear that no massacre of any kind took place

2. Yet the Media of the West gathering on Tuzla began to spread lies in the west that there was a horrible massacre

3. At the same time the authoritive Dutch Report working seriously at the same time was pinpointing these lying journalists, and affirming that no massacre happened


But this rotten media of a rotting western capitalist system knows how to operate and by constant repetition of a massacre “of 8000 men and boys” by the Serbs it became the norm.

The Dutch Report was buried and anybody who questioned the Media Lie became labelled as genocide “deniers”!.

And that, my friends, is the significance of the BBC giving all this space to this known lying machine which works on behalf od US and British Imperialism, of whom George Soros is thought to be an intelligence agent 


by Felix Quigley

August 28, 2008

We are going to be casting an eye on the contortions of Israpundit, the Canadian cum US Imperialist supporting website on the choosing of Biden by the Democrats.

What will they do? Will they expose the anti Serb and anti Russian nature of the politics of Biden. No! But that is the essence of the man.

To give us some background into this knotty problem of what way Israpundit will jump, peruse this report from the excellent Byzantine Blog. Remember Bill Narvey telling Nathan Pearlstein and his Serb chums to get the hell offen Israpundit!!!

[Begin quote here]

August 27, 2008

Biden Caught Ustasha Virus

Senator Joseph Biden

Joe Biden Caught Virulent Serbophobia from the Ustasha Clergy Back in the Early 1980s

When Obama’s running mate Joe Biden stated that “all Serbs should be placed in Nazi-style concentration camps” during Senatorial deliberations in 1999 over NATO aggression on Serbia, most of the world was unaware of the source of such virulent Serb-hatred one would generally be ashamed of harboring, let alone advertising. But issuing a statement that amounts to approval of the genocide Serbian nation had already been subjected to during the WWII, by the Croat fascists — Ustashe — and that it should, indeed, have been entirely exterminated in the death camps of which Ustasha-run Jasenovac was the most macabre chain of slaughterhouses in Europe, could have been inspired only by the pathological Croat Ustasha ideology fueled and grown on pure, undiluted hatred of everything Serbian. Continue reading


by Felix Quigley

August 13, 2008

The amazingly wonderful Byzantine Blog has just carried out the most damning exposure of the Western Media. It has not in all honesty been the most difficult thing in the world to do. It has merely meant the juxtaposition of two photos from Reuters. But THEY have done it and I personally am most grateful to them.

[begin quote from Byzantine Blog here]


August 12, 2008

Deceiving the World with Pictures

This photo was first published by the Reuters as an image of a “dead woman being carried by the Georgian soldiers from the town of Gori”. But this “dead woman”, incredibly, is clutching the nurse’s arm.

This man exhibiting rage and grief happens to sit in the exact same place where the earlier picture was taken: the same pile of garbage is behind his back and scraps of metal from the picture of a “dead” woman being ‘rescued’ are lying around like in the earlier photo — plus some, additional, unidentified scraps of metal. What are these supposed to represent?

Fighting Dirty: Pictures to Provoke Hatred and More Suffering

Remember the image of an emaciated Bosnian Muslim allegedly caged behind “Serb barbed wire”, in a “Serb concentration camp” Trnopolje? The fake photo filmed by a British news team became a worldwide symbol of the war in Bosnia. Even after it was proven that the “prisoner” wasn’t a prisoner to begin with, and was filmed outside the gate, part of which had barbed wire, this picture had still continued to be proudly exhibited all over the world to this day as the “evidence” that Serbs ran the “concentration camps” Continue reading


by Felix Quigley

13 August, 2008

We have to examine the attack which Georgia made on the town which is called the “capital” of South Ossetia. Tskhinvali may be the capital but is really only a town. Numbers in this situation do matter to understand the nature of the CIA backed Georgian Government.

It is clear that this was a cowardly attack, unprovoked and done in the most cold blooded manner, using a situation when the gaze of the world was on the Olympics and when the Russian leaders were present at the Olympic Opening ceremony in China.

We also have to examine the results of this attack. If 2000 or even just 1000 citizens of South Ossetia were killed, do the maths and see how this would work out as a comparision with America. I make it many millions of America killed in one night.

I make this genocide on a scale that has not been seen since the Nazi Holocaust of the Jews.

Then there is as the Russians have remarked the strange treatment of the Media in all of this. This genocide is ignored, and is immediately pushed into the background. Then the lying machine of the Media based on anti Slav racism took over.

We have to also get an understanding of the nature of the CIA backed “Revolutions”, given by the Media various colours of “Rose” “Orange” etc. What a nice image, a “rose” revolution!!!

What kind of regimes did the CIA foist onto the ordinary people of these regions.

“Slate carried this article which may be useful now to look at again.

[begin quote here]

The Blush Is Off Georgia’s Rose Revolution

Another U.S. ally declares a state of emergency.

Protests in Tbilisi. Click image to expand. A Georgian opposition supporter falls as police disperse protesters
TBILISI, Georgia—It was a clear and cool afternoon—and the 90th anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution—when thousands of protesters marched Continue reading


by Felix Quigley

August 9, 2008

Tropas georgianas se desplazan durante un conflicto con separatistas de Osetia del Sur.

Georgian troops have attacked a small area which has a Russian majority, South Osetia. Note the very latest hardware, courtesy of US and British Imperialists!

We have now moved into the field of Neo-Nazi politics with the brutal attack of US puppet Georgia on a disputed area in which there is a Russian majority. It is called South Ossetia which lies to the North of Georgia. There is also another disputed area called Abjasia, which is located on the North West of Georgia (in the shape of a triangle with one side running alongside the Black Sea)

It is the Georgian pro Imperialists and reactionaries who are attacking. But it is US and British Imperialism (NATO) which is pulling the strings. Continue reading


by Felix Quigley


August 3, 2008


They claimed 8000 men and boys murdered by the Serbs in Srebrenica. Sometimes 7000 but not quite so often. It was usually 8000.

In reviewing the Irish newspaper of record, The Irish Times, they have written from 1995 to the present in major articles referring to this Srebrenica Massacre where the Serbs murdered 8000 men and boys, going now up to 500 times since 1995, indeed using my limited maths I make that perhaps a major article every 10 days or so.

Are there 2000 such papers and magazines etc in the world doing this? I think so and much more but if so that makes it a million such vital articles broadcast into humanity. All saying the same thing, the endless repetition, that the Serbs murdered 8000 Muslims in Srebrenica.

But there is also The Dutch Report which these media outlets seem to have stuffed deep into the unknown recesses of their filing cabinets. Thanks to Mick Tanzer a regular reader for sending details of this report to 4international. 

“Then there is this astonishing and explosive material from the Dutch “Netherlands Institute for War Documentation” Report [from 2002]This blows the lid off of how Clinton, Albright, the Western media and NATO created the Srebrenica Big Lie:


This report by obviously staid conservative type people has been an absolute eye-opener. This is material that the liars on Harry’s Place will never ever go near. Continue reading


By Felix Quigley

August 1, 2008

Karadzic is now in a prison in the Hague and the whole apparatus of repression of this illegal NATO Court is ranged against him.

I ask the question here: Who were the Serbs fighting in Bosnia?

Were these MODERATE Muslims who they were forced to fight? Or were they extremists?

This article will go partly to answer that: This information has been put together by the excellent Carl Savich on the equally excellent site:

for original see url

[begin article here]

Alija Izetbegovic with Al-Qaeda and mujahedeen forces who were part of the Bosnian Muslim Army.

Ali Ahmed Ali Hamad, an Al-Qaeda commander who was part of the Bosnian Muslim Army during the 1992-1995 civil, testified under oath at the war crimes trial of Bosnian Muslim military commander Rasim Delic that the Bosnian Muslim Government of Alija Izetnegovic had knowledge of Al-Qaeda war crimes against Bosnian Serb civilians and POWs but did nothing to prevent or punish them. Continue reading


by Felix Quigley

July 25, 2008

Adam le Bor is part of the gang who hang out around sites like Harry’s Place. They on Harry’s Place, with a few exceptions but not those who run that site, are the biggest liars on G-ds earth because they promote continually that the Serbs carried out a massacre of 8000 Muslims in Srebrenica. This is a massive lie, a blatant lie, part of the Orwellian Big Lie syndrome. They know it too which makes it not a lie by mistake but a lie by intent.

We have answered fully and carefully in the most succinct and unmistakable form this horrific Big Lie that has been perpetrated against the wonderful and historical people of Serbia.

See for example:

[begin quote here]

There was never a shred of forensic evidence ever presented to prove that even ONE Muslim was executed by the VRS (Republic of Srpska – Bosnian Serb army).

Yes, you read that correctly: NATO’s ICTY kangaroo court in the Hague failed to produce even a shred of evidence to support the charge that even ONE Bosnian Muslim was executed!!

Not one eye-witness was EVER presented during July 1995 who said that they saw with their own eyes a SINGLE atrocity by VRS forces take place.

This was even reported in the British press at the time!! (July, 1995)

Hubert Wieland, personal representative of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, told the [UK] Daily Telegraph (July 24, 1995, electronic edition):

“we have not found anyone who saw with their own eyes an atrocity taking place.”

[end quote here]

And much more! Please study the whole article very carefully!

First let me repeat from the above quote for effect and to concentrate the mind:

Not one eye-witness was EVER presented during July 1995 who said that they saw with their own eyes a SINGLE atrocity by VRS forces take place. Continue reading


by Felix Quigley

July 24, 2008

{article 1}

“Our goal: the Islamization of Muslims. Our methods: to believe and to struggle.”—Alija Izetbegovic, “Islamic Declaration,” 1970

“O’ Alija, O’ honored! You drive America crazy!” –Line from Arabic poetry sung by foreign mujahideen during Bosnian war “

As seen in the url this is from the Young Muslims in Canada.  The Young Muslims of Canada are motivated by the ideas of the Muslim Brotherhood. Why then should the above lines praising Izetbegovic be appearing on the website of the Muslim Brothers in Canada? Was Elija Izetbegovic not an apostle of democracy, American and Western type democracy to be precise? He was certainly sold like this in every newspaper in Europe and in America. Izetbegovic was a particular favourite of a certain Mr Oliver Kamm, just promoted to being a Lead Writer for the venerable Times of London!

Let us continue with the musings of the Muslim Brothers aka Young Muslims of Canada a little further, the writer a certain member of the Muslim Brotherhood called Ismail Royer.

[begin quote here]

“Do we want the Muslim people to leave their going-around-in-circles, their dependence, backwardness, and poverty?” Izetbegovic once wrote, “Then we show clearly which path will take us to that goal: establishing Islam in every field in the personal life of the individual, in family and society…and the establishment of a unique Islamic community from Morocco to Indonesia.” Continue reading


by Felix Quigley

July 13, 2008

The following series of  lies and our attempt to rebut these lies is of interest I feel. In recent days there has been an attack on our site and on 4international by Israpundit commenter Yamit82. The centre of the attack is on Trotsky and this person pulls all the dirty tricks out of hte bag to slander Leon Trotsky. His attacks on Trotsky brings to mind the very worst attacks by Stalinism on the Trotskyist movement in the late 20s and 30s. His language is crude and vile. Yet this is a person who claims to be Jewish. I firmly believe that this Yamit82 does not represent in the slightest the great traditions of the Jewish people and their great intellectual heritage. Not one person on Israpundit including its editor Ted Belman made any defence of Trotsky. The following was said by Yamit82 (another bone of contention I do not have his real name)

Trotsky was a lousy Jew, a lousy revolutionary, and couldn’t in the end even defend himself from an axe splitting his head open from a Stalinist Assassin. Funny though if he had used his Jewish rights to return to his Jewish Homeland he might probably have survived Stalin and then who knows what his contribution might have been. One could make a case for his murder, was that he had turned his back on Jews in favor of a secular religion which was antithetical to Judaism. ” Continue reading


by Felix Quigley

July 11, 2008

Israel must now act to destroy the Iranian Nuclear Bomb making without any delay. This means that Israel must without any hesitation whatsoever declare war on the Iranian Islamofascist regime and must strike and strike hard at these bomb making facilities which the Mullahs are running.

At the same time Israel must break decisively from American Imperialism which in every statement and in every action that it takes now, shows that it is a friend of Iran, and not a friend of Israel.

Every single thing that we have learned about the US Imperialists in the destruction of Yugoslavia shows that the US is in league with Islam and Islamofascism on a world scale. We know that the US supported the Fascist Tudjman in the murder and ethnic cleansing of the Krajina of half a million of Serbs. We know that the US was fully behind the Islamofascist Izetbegovic. We know that the US in Bosnia joined with Bin Laden, Saudi Arabia and Iran in using Islamist killers to crush the Serbs. We know that the US along with the party of Izetbegovic planned and created the hoax “massacre” in Srebrenica in otrder to crush the Serbs. Continue reading


by Felix Quigley

July 7, 2008

The Hague Kangaroo Court was set up by US Imperialism and by NATO in order to hand down a verdict of guilty on Slobodan Milosevic, and through that of course on the whole Serb independent nation. It was shown by Milosevic, however, that it is possible to use even these sorts of phoney courts to get some truth about what happened out to the world.

The evidence which the French General seconded to the UN Philippe Morillon gave to the Kangaroo Court was one such example of some truth emerging. The strange thing though is that Morillon was a witness for the Prosecution against Milosevic.

The questioning of Morillon by Milosevic and his aide in the court brought out many important things. But it is of great importance to note that this evidence has been deliberately hidden by Kamm and Hoare ever since he appeared in the Court in 2004. You will find no report in any of their writings of the evidence of Morillon in that Kangaroo Courtroom.

This is an extract from a report of this evidence, the part which concentrates on the history of Srebrenica as a UN safe area, in which the Bosnian Islamofascists of Izetbegovic were heavily armed and organized for war within the safe area, in which the Islamofascist Nasir Oric figured highly IN CARRYING OUT HIS GHASTLY MURDERS. The evidence of Morillon concentrates on Oric. Continue reading