IF ASSAD IS DEFEATED BY NATO AND PALESTINIANS THEN ISRAEL IS UNDER DIRECT THREAT

Where does Israel and the Jews, and Serbia and the Serbs, go now?

 

Very simply the truth is not being told to anybody. The world is literally filled with Jews and Jewish pundits who supported the overthrow of Mubarak and who wished to see the overthrow right there and then of Gadhafi

 

The difference between the two was very obvious. Mubarak did not realise what he was up against, that he was not just up against Egyptian protesters, but was up against the whole of US Imperialist Power, British Imperialist Power, EU Imperialist Power, and all of those in a rough but definite alliance with Arabs and Islam

 

(It is exactly similar to the Jews of Israel. There they go, day after day, week after week, beind the most atrocious leaders, and they do not understand how far advanced are the plans to wipe them out. Remember in the 90s, similar kind of leaders led the Serbs)

 

But Gadhafi who also had been in alliance with Imperialism learned from the experience, and also he was a tougher kind of person, Mubarak being more of the conservative Nasserite army man, Gadhafi having dabbled with terror etc

 

So Gadhafi decided to fight against this infernal US Power alliance with Islam. And it is still not over but the lesson is clear, better to fight anyway, because the images of poor Mubarak being propped up on a gurney are indeed poignant, and he is a prisoner essenctially of Qaradawi and the Muslim Brotherhood

 

I have always, ALWAYS, found DEBKA to be consistent. Sure they have got things wrong but the general path of their analysis and reckoning has been that Netanyahu is too close to US Power Elites, and that anyway he is unable to either comprehend or to put together a fighting strategy for the Jews.

 

Caroline Glick wanted Jews to support the opposition to Assad. Why? If Assad falls then there will certainly be ISLAM SHARIA in power in Syria, and Christians and Kurds will be no more.

 

(Start Debka report on Assad against “Palestinians” here)

 

Syria tanks enter Homs while fighting Palestinians in Latakia

 
Syrian-Palestinian battlefield in Latakia

Encouraged by the 15-day leeway granted him by the US President Barak Obama and Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan, Bashar Assad Monday, Aug. 15, sent his tanks backed by mechanized infantry into Homs, a town of 1.5 million inhabitants. Witnesses report heavy shelling and clouds of smoke. Homs is Syria’s third largest town and the biggest the Syrian military has assaulted in the course of the five-month uprising against the Assad regime.

While Obama and Edrogan presented the extra time they granted Assad as his last chance to implement reforms, the Syrian ruler is making use of it to crack down harder and grind the opposition to dust. After that, the Assads will reign supreme and there will be no one left to fight for reforms.

Sunday, Aug. 14, debkafile reported on Palestinian armed resistance to Syrian tank incursions in the coastal town of Latakia.

For the first time in the five-month anti-Assad uprising, Syrian forces clashed with dissident Palestinians Sunday, Aug. 14, in the al-Raml a-Filistini district of Syria’s biggest port Latakia. As they moved toward the town center, the two Syrian tank divisions and armored infantry were challenged by Palestinians firing heavy machine guns, anti-tank RPGs and roadside bombs. Nineteen of the 24 dead Sunday were Palestinians. 
debkafile’s military sources affirm that contrary to earlier reports, the Syrian missile ships cruising offshore took no part in the attack on Latakia. Their function is to blockade the port against arms smuggling. Nevertheless the weapons used by Palestinians fighting in Latakia Sunday came from Lebanon aboard smugglers’ boats. There are almost daily incidents of Syrian ships firing on suspect vessels.
NATO headquarters in Brussels and the Turkish high command are meanwhile drawing up plans for their first military step in Syria, which is to arm the rebels with weapons for combating the tanks and helicopters spearheading the Assad regime’s crackdown on dissent. Instead of repeating the Libyan model of air strikes, NATO strategists are thinking more in terms of pouring large quantities of anti-tank and anti-air rockets, mortars and heavy machine guns into the protest centers for beating back the government armored forces.

Since the Syrian air force would certainly shoot down air transports making the drops, the tendency is to get the weapons to their destination overland, namely through Turkey and under Turkish army protection by either of two routes: The Turkish plan drafted some months ago for establishing buffer zones inside the Syrian border, is one. The refugees from the battle zone would be given sanctuary there instead of crossing into Turkey and the protected enclaves would also serve as weapons distribution depots.
Alternatively, the arms would be trucked into Syria under Turkish military guard and transferred to rebel leaders at pre-arranged rendezvous.
NATO and Turkish military sources have declined to indicate when, how and by what means, the Syrian rebels, civilians with no experience in firearms, will receive the weapons.

debkafile’s military sources disclose that for the past two weeks, at least, Syrian protest leaders and army deserters have been training in the use of the new weapons with Turkish military officers at makeshift installations in Turkish bases near the Syrian border.

Also discussed in Brussels and Ankara, our sources report, is a campaign to enlist thousands of Muslim volunteers in Middle East countries and the Muslim world to fight alongside the Syrian rebels. The Turkish army would house these volunteers, train them and secure their passage into Syria.

These NATO plans were the underlying script for US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s call on unnamed nations Friday, August 12 to stop sending arms to Syria.

Our sources report she was referring to Russia which has stepped up its shipments of ammunition and tank spares in the last two weeks.

All the tanks the Syrian army is using to crush protest are made in Russia. Military sources in Washington Brussels would like to put a mechanism in place for counter-balancing the Syrian army’s hardware deliveries from Russia or Iran by Western supplies to the opponents of the Assad regime, turning the asymmetric contest into an arms race.

(www.debka.com)

 

TAKING THE FIGHT AGAINST THE ANTISEMITIC FLOTILLAS TO THE ANTISEMITES

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Stewart Ain and Amy Spiro

http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/short_takes/campus_battles_lead_lawsuits

The Mideast campus wars in the U.S. and Canada are getting physical.

A graffiti-decorated mock bomb shelter in Washington Square Park.Photo by Michael Datikash

A graffiti-decorated mock bomb shelter in Washington Square Park.Photo by Michael Datikash

 

As the atmosphere for pro-Israel students at some colleges reportedly gets dicier, two Jewish students who have allegedly been assaulted by anti-Israeli demonstrators on separate college campuses have struck back.

A civil suit against the University of California at Berkeley and the Regents of the University of California claims the universities were derelict in their legal responsibilities to protect the rights of their students. In filing the suit on behalf of Jessica Felber, 20, her attorney, Neal Sher, said colleges and universities have become battlegrounds for those who seek to delegitimize Israel. As a result, he said, an atmosphere of intimidation and harassment of Jewish and pro-Israel students has been created that is condoned by university officials.

The suit claims that Felber was attacked and injured on campus in March 2010, during a pro-Israel event while holding a sign reading, “Israel Wants Peace.” It identified her assailant as a fellow student who was the leader of Students for Justice in Palestine.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights has announced plans to investigate a lecturer’s complaint that Israel’s critics at the University of California at Santa Cruz had created a hostile environment for Jews on campus.

The second student, Sammy Katz, last month filed a complaint with Ontario’s Human Rights Tribunal similarly alleging that York University in Toronto has tolerated an environment hostile to Jews on campus.

In the complaint, filed by Sher and professor Ed Morgan, Katz said a male and female student assaulted him in February 2010, while he attempted to record an angry confrontation between pro- and anti-Israel supporters at a pro-Israel table on campus.

It is alleged that the university refused to show Katz a security camera recording of the confrontation that it later played for the press to refute the assault charge. A subsequent hearing found that the university had acted inappropriately and that Katz had indeed been assaulted, according to the complaint.

The JTA news service reported that tension has risen in recent years between pro- and anti-Israel groups at Canadian universities. York expelled a student a year ago for allegedly advocating genocide against Jews, and McGill University in Montreal is now investigating a student who allegedly tweeted a threat to shoot participants at a pro-Israel event.

Meanwhile, in a piece of street theater, members of the Birthright Israel Alumni Community set up a mock bomb shelter in Washington Square Park this week.

The building, decorated with graffiti by Artists 4 Israel, was set up in the middle of the park, adjacent to New York University’s campus. Sirens periodically rang out, which gave participants 15 seconds to run into the shelter, simulating the reality in Sderot and other southern Israeli towns.

“We want to remind people that there are people behind the headlines,” said Rebecca Sugar, executive director of the New York Birthright Israel alumni community, “and that Israelis live with a certain reality. Even if you really deeply care about Israel it can be difficult to connect emotionally.”

The installation will be set up on various college campuses this year, said Sugar, bringing awareness to daily life in Israel and also providing “shelter from the anti-Israel rhetoric” that often permeates campus life.

 

http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/short_takes/campus_battles_lead_lawsuits

PALESTINIAN ARAB YOUTHS CHARGED WITH SLAUGHTER OF FOGEL FAMILYY

They did THIS for “Palestine”

 

“They went back into the house and stabbed the baby to death to silence her cries,” a security source said following the arrests in April.

File:The victims Itamar massacre .jpg

 Fogel family Itimar

I can see NO difference in what these two quite crazed Arabs did to what is being prepared by the Flotilla brigades, which are roaming about countries like Ireland, seeking to stir up hatred against the Jewish Homeland

 

What kind of Palestine?

 

Well for sure a Judenfreik Palestine. What is the difference in saying a “Judenfrei” “Palestine” and what these two non human Arabs did?

 

“Youth” charged with slaughter of Israeli family: “I don’t regret what I did, and would do it again. I’m proud of what I did and I’ll accept any punishment I get, even death, because I did it all for Palestine.”

An unsurprising update on this story. “Palestinian youths charged with slaughter of Fogel family,” by Yaakov Lappin for the Jerusalem Post, June 5:

Two Palestinian youths from the West Bank village of Awarta, arrested in April on suspicion of murdering five members of the Fogel family in Itamar, were charged with five counts of homicide at a military court on Sunday.

The defendants, 17-year-old Hakim Awad and 18-year-old Amjad Awad, who are from the same clan, have confessed to stabbing and shooting two young brothers, their parents, and a three-month-old baby in the attack.

“I don’t regret what I did, and would do it again,” Amjad Awad told reporters in court. “I’m proud of what I did and I’ll accept any punishment I get, even death, because I did it all for Palestine,” he added.

The charge sheet detailed how the two saw two young brothers sleeping in their beds, 4-year-old Elad and 11-year-old Yoav, snuck into the home, and stabbed them both to death.

They then entered the parents’ bedroom, where they launched a knife attack on Ehud and Ruth Fogel. The parents fought back, attempting to fend off the attackers. Ehud died of stab wounds and Ruth was shot dead by the attackers with a stolen M-16 gun.

The two then left the house, before hearing cries from three-month-old baby Hadas. Awoken by the attack, the baby lay in its crib in the parents’ bedroom.

“They went back into the house and stabbed the baby to death to silence her cries,” a security source said following the arrests in April.

Posted by Marisol on June 5, 2011

(Thanks to Jihadwatch)

 

 

 

LET THIS COMMENT ON JIHADWATCH SINK IN. IT REALLY IS THE TRUTH.

 

ReligionofPeas | June 5, 2011 2:10 PM | Reply

I’m surprised they weren’t nominated for joint chairmanship of the UN Council for Human Rights. Clearly, their actions were a symbolic protest against the oppression they have received at the hands of the Israelis.

TIME WILL TELL…THE PERFORMANCE OF NETANYAHU WAS A DISASTER FOR ISRAEL AND WILL END UP WITH A MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD AL QAIDA STATE ON ISRAEL’S BORDERS

Netanyahu addressed Congress yesterday and got over 50 standing ovations, but he forgot one thing: This was the leadership of American Imperialism that he was addressing and the key sentence in the speech of Netanyahu was when he referred to the coming to power of The Muslim Brotherhood in all countries, thanks to both the Democrats AND Republicans. In other words two sets of people, very important peoples, AMERICANS AND ISRAELIS, are being led into the jaws of death by these leaders, Netanyahu and the Israeli elite, the Democrats under Obama and Clinton, and the Republicans who, and this is the key issue, are fundamentally no different.

That key sentence from Netanyahu:

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu spoke of ”about the great convulsion taking place in the Middle East” in his opening remarks and said that the “ground is still shifting” and that the uprisings in the Muslim countries represent people’s demands for liberty — but like 1979 Iran, the outcomes were in question.

This is the Big Lie that is peddled and that Netanyahu in his speech to Congress joined in with.

The Uprisings in the Middle East are not about democracy, but liberty, and here we mean the liberty to have ONE ELECTION ONE TIME

 

This is the peculiar form of Liberty that the Muslim Brotherhood is seeking in every one of these countries.

IN HIS SPEECH TO CONGRESS NETANYAHU UTTERED NOT ONE WORD ABOUT LIBYA WHICH IS PRESENTLYH BEING BOMBED NIGHTLY BY NATO. THIS REPRESENTS THE TOTAL BETRAYAL OF THE JEWS BY THIS LEADER (FAUX  LEADER)

Not a word from Netanyahu about Libya where NATO, the worst enemies of the Jews in Obama and the EU (Cameron and SARKOZY), HAS NOW BEEN BOMBING TRIPOLI HEAVILY IN THE LAST 2 NIGHTS
In fact Netanyahu making a big deal out of Israel being loyal to the US made it very clear where he stands. he stands with NATO, always with NATO. Has he been bought earlier in life.

This “prophet” Netanyahu leads the Jews into the jaws of death and I can smell the flesh burning from here.

When Netanyahu speaks this is not the proud Jewish people who returned from Babylon equipped with their Bible and capable national self consciousness. He is projecting Jews and Israel as being the dhimmis of America

Meanwhile the ONLY strategy which American Jewish groups can produce is to pin everything on the replacement of Obama by a Republican. But that does not break the “dhimmi of America” mentality.

There is NO middle road here and the main problem is that Israel does not have a human being who can articulate the need.

This is to

1. Bring the San Remo Conference of 1920 into play in all discussions

2. Bring into play also the criminality of Britain and Churchill and direct this specially to Cameron that Britain robbed the Jews in the following months (leading to the Cairo Conference of 1920) of 80 per cent of their promised Homeland

3. That these “Palestinians” are a fake, the product of the machinations of Britain and America, and of their promotion of Holocaust organizer Hajj Amin el Husseini. Not only “Palestinians” but “Palestinian Arabs” is a rubbish term.

THE RACISM INHERENT IN THIS US AND EU CONSCIOUSNESS WHICH NETANYAHU ASKS JEWS TO JOIN WITH

The danger is not at all just Obama. The danger is this American and EU consciousness, where they look on Libya and could care less about past and solemn agreements, such as that made by George W. Bush with Muammar Gadhafi. An agreement with Gadhafi what nonsence we are the great Americans!

And the big danger is these “republicans” who see the agreement with Gadhafi made by Bush as being just an agreement with a “native”, of no real consequence.

TO THEM NETANYAHU IS A HERO BUT NETANYAHU IS PREPARING TO SURRENDER BYU FORCE JEWISH HISTORICAL LAND WHICH IS RIGHTFULLY THEIRS

And at this moment in time as far as these same people are concerned Netanyahu can do no wrong

The only problem with this is that the Democrats AND republicans have wrought havoc in the Middle East. Mubarak who is threatened now with execution BY THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, AND NOW LIBYA AND GADHAFI, PROVES THAT THEY CANNOT BE TRUSTED FOR A SECOND

How Mubarak must now rue trusting America. How Gadhafi must regret not acquiring those Nuclear arms.

But Israel is treading the same path.
EVERYTHING about Netanyahu to me stinks.

WHAT CAROLINE GLICK SAYS ON THIS AND WHERE THAT LEAVES US

The main point that Glick makes is that Obama created a diversion. She is certainly right.

By far the biggest event and issue centres on Hamas specifically and on the agreement which Abbas has made with Hamas. The differences between the two remain, it is purely opportunistic and episodic…remember that, it is most important.

The great Netanyahu policy rests on from (the pupils of Nazi Hajj Amin el Husseini) Hamas and Fatah, a mere form of words, and hey presto Muslim Brotherhood sit on the flank of Israel equipped with an army paid for and trained by American and EU antisemitism.

America under both Republican and Democratic Governments have built up the army of Abbas and that is going to be taken over, post September election, by the Hamas. The Muslim Brotherhood proceeds apace in every country thanks due to US Imperialism. The alliance as crisis engulfs capitalism is certainly formal though hidden and strategic.

Hamas is based upon the Protocols of Zion and is pure antisemitism. So that is what the Obama policy has achieved and which is largely hidden by the Republicans, because they in Bush and Rice were responsible initially for just that policy. Before that Clinton, Carter, Bush Snr. and Reagan…you see it is an unbroken seam.

Glick is right. Obama created a diversion from this reality, the 49 Armistice Borders, which he calls the 67 Borders, another Big Lie right there!

By cheering Netanyahu’s speechifying to the rafters Jewish blogs in America play into this deception.

The relevant Caroline Glick paragraphs are here:

Obama had two options for contending with the Palestinian unity deal. He could pay attention to it or he could create a distraction in order to ignore it. If he paid attention to it, he would have been forced to disavow his policy of blaming his predecessors in the White House and Israel for the absence of peace. By creating a distraction he would be able to change the subject in a manner that would enable him to maintain those policies.
 
And so he picked a fight with Netanyahu. And by picking the fight, he created a distraction that has, in fact, changed the subject and enabled Obama to maintain his policies that have been wholly repudiated by the reality of the Palestinian unity deal.
 
By inserting the citation of the 1949 armistice lines into his speech, Obama made Israel’s size again the issue.
 
The Hamas-Fatah unity deal actually demonstrates that not only is Israel’s size not the cause of the conflict, it is the main reason that Israelis and Palestinians live in relative peace.
 
Israel’s control over Judea and Samaria and east Jerusalem, and with them, its ability to ward off invasion and attacks on its major cities is what has prevented wars. If Israel were more vulnerable, the de facto Palestinian terror state would not be weighing whether or not to begin a new terror war as its leaders from Fatah and Hamas are doing today. It would be waging a continuous campaign of terror whose clear aim is Israel’s destruction for again, as Netanyahu said the 1949 armistice lines make war an attractive option for Israel’s enemies.
 
BY PICKING a fight with Netanyahu, since Thursday, no one could have possibly noted this basic truth because the false issue of Israel’s control over these areas – that is, Israel’s size – has dominated the global discourse on the Middle East.
 
 
After that Glick makes other useful points, but after making these vital remarks, shows the limitations of present bourgeois Jewish leadership in ending like this:
 
 

Netanyahu deserves a lot of credit for standing up to Obama on Friday. He showed enormous courage in doing so. It was his finest hour to date and polls over the weekend show that the public appreciates and supports him for it. He must build on that success by putting the focus on the truth.

 
It was NOT a success.
 
Netanyahu missed the essence which is that Obama speaks to a very specific audience, and since he is out of the Khalidi cum Edward Said school it is the audience of American and European antisemitism.
 
Israel expansionist? You must be jokkng! israel is less than the size of Munster which is about one quarter of tiny Ireland, a mere province for goodness sake.
 
That is what Obama and the antisemites want to attack and to reduce further. How hard is it to make that case against THAT!
 
Netanyahu did not stand up to Obama at all. That is a mirage. He seemed to but that is only to very stupid people.
 
As Yamit82 on Israpundit has pointed out in opposition to editor Ted belman that will still mean stripping 100,000 Jews from their home in Judea.
 
As we have often stated Jewish leadership is in a gigantic crisis and this will only be resolved through the quest for new leadership.
 
Our sister website www.wedefendisrael.com is pioneering a series of articles on history which incorporates many lessons and will be a focus of important lessons being learned
 
The way forward can be found but it will not be found easily.

 

OBAMA REPRESENTS SUBMISSION TO ISLAM AND ALSO AN ALLIANCE OF HATE AGAINST US ALL

There is a clear link between all of these issues:

 

  1. The continual bombing of Libya by NATO, in which the word of the west to Gadhafi, and the agreement of the west with Gadhafi, has been totally broken. Now NATO is bombing Libya on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood
  2. Obama is a big problem for the world. Obama insisted on destroying Mubarak in Egypt and now the new military government, which relies on and is working clasely with the very powerful Muslim Brotherhood there, is opening up the gate to Hamas, and is threatening huge warfare on the Jewish state
  3. Obama again, big problem for Israel, because Obama always advised slowly slowly nice nice with Assad. But the main businessman and speaking for Assad has threatened direct war on Israel, the anti-Semites are overjoyed, but if Israel is threatened like this watch those nukes fly. Those ex pats on the Costas in Spain, at present sunning their asses by their pools, will soon have nukes to warm them up!
  4. The lies, the lies, the lies! From Srebrenica, from hajj Amin el Husseini, from links of same to Izetbegovic, from Karen Armstrong, from Muhammed el Dura affair, from Cameron on Gadhafi, from “Responsibility to protect giant lie, lies of Cair and Muslim groups in Britain, we live in a sea of deceit

It is a big, big issue for us on 4international and wedefendistrael. Also our own history, Leon Trotsky was the most lied about and lied against man on the planet, lies that led to his murder.

 

How to proceed? Above all there must be a discussion and there must be protection of the discussion.

 

THERE ARE TWO MAIN FACTORS, NOT ONE, WORKING IN THE WORLD TODAY THAT THREATEN ISRAEL AND THREATEN US ALL

It must be understood very clearly that there are always 2 factors working in the world today

1. There is Islam, with its Sharia Law, in our modern terms morphing into a Fascist ideology, used to make war and to suppress, suppress especially the billions of poor in Islamist states

2. Western Imperialism, personified by the crisis in US and British capitalism, driving same to make an alliance with Fascist Islam

 

THAT IS OUR HYPOTHESIS

That hypothesis is not written in stone, but must be continually tested

WE ASK THE QUESTION…WHY DID THE NEW YORK TIMES TELL LIES ABOUT THE EGYPT SITUATION, TO THE EXTENT OF DOCTORING PHOTOGRAPHS (see www.tenc.net)

WE ALSO ASK CONTINUALLY WHERE IS THE EGYPT SITUATION LEADING TO, ESPECIALLY IN RELATION TO DANGER TO ISRAEL

THIS EGYPT SITUATION AND BETRAYAL OF MUBARAK AND GADHAFI IS LINKED EVERY MORNING IN OUR NEWS OF NATO BOMBING LIBYA ON BEHALF OF ISLAMISTS

 

WE WILL LOOK AT 2 ITEMS

1. ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC CRISIS IN EGYPT

2. OBAMA’s NEVER ENDING GROVELLING TO ISLAM

 

CRISIS IN EGYPT

Egypt’s currency has declined by only about 6% since January, despite substantial capital flight, due to market intervention by the central bank, but the rapid drawdown of reserves is unsustainable.

At this rate Egypt will be broke by September.

Egypt imported $55 billion worth of goods in 2009, but exported only $29 billion of goods. With the jump in food and energy prices, the same volume of imports would cost considerably more. Egypt closed the 2009 trade gap with about $15 billion in tourist revenues, and about $8 billion of remittances from Egyptian workers abroad. But tourism today is running at a fraction of last year’s levels, and remittances are down by around half due to expulsion of Egyptian workers from Libya. Even without capital flight, Egypt is short perhaps $25 billion a year.

Price controls and currency depreciation have made it more profitable for wholesalers – including some employees of state companies – to export rice and cooking oil illegally. According to the daily al-Ahram, hoarding of rice by wholesalers has pushed up the price of the grain by 35% this year, while 200 containers per day are sold to Turkey and Syria.

“What is happening,” the newspaper claims, is that that traders are storing basic items such as rice and barley, hoarded in barns and in large quantities, and are reluctant to send it to the rice mills in order to raise the price of this strategic commodity”. The al-Ahram report, headlined, “Conspiracy to Monopolize Rice,” demands physical inspection of containers leaving Egyptian ports.
The rest of the story is predictable. Once the government relies on young men with guns to police its merchants, hoarding will only get worse. The Egyptian revolution has cracked down on the commercial elite that ran the country’s economy for the past 60 years, and the elite will find ways to transfer as much of its wealth to safety as it can. The normal chain of distribution will break down and “revolutionary committees” will take control of increasingly scarce supplies. Farmers won’t get fuel and fertilizer, and domestic supplies will fail.

The Egyptian government will go to the International Monetary Fund and other aid agencies for loans – the government reportedly will ask for $7 billion to tide things over – and foreign money at best will buy a few months’ respite. The currency will collapse; the government will print IOUs to tide things over; and the Egyptian street will reject the IOUs as the country reverts to barter.

 

EGYPT WIL ACTUALLY STARVE

It will look like the Latin American banana republics, but without the bananas. That is not meant in jest: few people actually starved to death in the Latin inflations. Egypt, which imports half its wheat and a great deal of the rest of its food, will actually starve.

Revolutions don’t only kill their children. They kill a great many ordinary people. The 1921 famine after the Russian civil war killed an estimated five million people, and casualties on the same scale are quite possible in Egypt as well. Half of Egyptians live on $2 a day, and that $2 is about to collapse along with the national currency, and the result will be a catastrophe of, well, biblical proportions.  (Spengler must know, it was not the revolution here, it was the war on the Russian baby workers state and blockade which caused the famine of 1921, 1922 and later. Britain France and US were main culprits)

Spengler is channeled by David P Goldman. Comment on this article in Spengler’s Expat Bar forum

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/ME10Ak01.html

NO 2 OBAMA’S NEW OUTREACH TO ISLAM

(ANALYSIS FROM WALL STREET JOURNAL)

Bin Laden’s death gives Mr. Obama a chance to underscore the belief among many administration officials that the terror leader’s relevance had already begun to diminish during the so-called Arab Spring. Mr. Obama, who has made outreach to the Muslim world a cornerstone of his presidency, plans to describe the Islamic world as at a crossroads, said U.S. officials, making the case that bin Laden represented a failed approach of the past while populist movements brewing in the Middle East and North Africa represent the future.

Mr. Rhodes said timing of the speech remains in flux but Mr. Obama could deliver it before leaving on a five-day trip to Europe on May 23. The White House is already telegraphing the message of the coming speech to the Islamic world by placing American diplomats on Arab television and radio, according to U.S. officials.

 

ALL OBAMA ROADS LEADING INTO ANTISEMITISM

The White House is still debating, however, whether Mr. Obama should lay out a concrete plan for revitalizing the stalled Arab-Israeli peace process.

Many Arab governments have been pressing Mr. Obama to publicly outline his own parameters for the creation of an independent Palestinian state as a way to exert more pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who visits Washington next week. These diplomats said the Mideast’s democratic surge is raising expectations among their own populations for an end to the decades-old Arab-Israeli conflict.

White House officials said they are still reassessing the monumental changes in the Middle East and whether an aggressive U.S. push to resume peace talks would likely be successful.

Last week, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas forged a unity government with the militant group Hamas, which the U.S. and European Union designate a terrorist group. Israeli officials have already cited Hamas’s role in the Palestinian Authority as the reason why Mr. Netanyahu is unlikely to unveil any major new overtures to the Palestinians during his Washington trip.

“We need to sort through these issues as we consider the next steps on a peace process,” Mr. Rhodes said. The May 20 Obama-Netanyahu meeting “is a chance for the U.S. and Israel to review the full range of issues, from Iran to the regional change to the peace process.”

Arab officials and Mideast peace advocates say there are major risks for the U.S. and Israel in delaying a return to talks.

Mr. Abbas is pressing the United Nations to recognize an independent Palestinian state during the September gathering of the General Assembly. He has specifically cited his frustration with the lack of progress in negotiations with Mr. Netanyahu, as well as the rising expectations among his own people as a result of the Arab Spring.

 

J STREET TRAITORS

“There’s clearly a lot going on in the region, and there’s a case to be made and some are making it, that now is not the time,” said Jeremy Ben-Ami, founder of J-Street, a U.S. lobbying group that advocates Washington laying out its own peace plan, something Israel’s government opposes. “But we do believe that the only way to avoid U.N. action on a Palestinian state in a unilateral kind of way is for either the president or prime minister to put forward” a peace plan.

A number of lawmakers have cited Hamas’s new alliance with Mr. Abbas as reason for the White House to move slowly in restarting the peace process. Mr. Netanyahu is scheduled to address a joint session of Congress during his Washington visit as well the annual conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the U.S.’s most powerful pro-Israel lobby.

Avigdor Lieberman, Israel’s foreign minister, on Tuesday broke with Israel’s policy of keeping quiet on the regional turmoil, saying the international community’s response to repression of demonstrations in Syria, Lybia and Yemen has been “inconsistent” and “confusing.” In remarks delivered before Mr. Netanyahu’s scheduled White House visit, Mr. Lieberman added that the confusion sends a “damaging message to the people of the Middle East, and further erodes the path to peace, security and democracy for our region.”

Mr. Obama is also scheduled to meet Jordan’s King Abdullah II in Washington next week. The Arab monarch has been at the forefront of Mideast leaders calling for the U.S. to impose its own peace plan on the Israelis and Palestinians. Jordan’s population is 60% Palestinian, and the king has faced his own popular protests in recent months.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703864204576315680040526802.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsTop

 

PAMELA GELLER OF ATLAS SHRUGS COMMENTS CORRECTLY ON OBAMA

Obama.bow.king

Obama intends to renew his Muslim outreach to the ummah. Renew? Uh, when did he stop?

You mean Osama bin Laden’s elaborate Islamic burial wasn’t enough?

Wasn’t Obama’s last submission tour to the Muslim world enough?

Obama ‘to deliver speech to Muslim world’ — wasn’t his last speech capitulation enough?

I contend that the American people are sick of this submission. The President of the United States should not be prostrating himself for a supremacist ideology whose objective is to destroy and dominate us.

The Muslim world should be doing the outreach to Coptic Christians in Egypt, to Jews in Israel and across the world, to Christians in Indonesia, Nigeria, Timor, Thailand, Bangladesh, Kenya, Chechnya, etc., Hindus in India, non-Muslims in Pakistan, women, children …….. their idea of outreach is “dawah” (proselytizing).

PAMELA GELELR IS CORRECT IN EVERYTHING SHE SAYS ABOVE

YET SHE LEAVES OUT THAT DAY AFTER DAY NATO IS BOMBARDING LIBYA AND SEEKING TO MURDER MUAMMAR GADHAFI

WHO HAD MADE A DEAL AND TRUSTED THE US

WHICH ALONE SHOWS WHAT A DANGER TO THE WORLD IS OBAMA

Why should we care in Europe if Michele Obama invites a nasty man calling himself artist into the White House? I think for very good reasons.

 

This “artistic” low life rapper expresses the sheer crisis in morals in the whole capitalist system.

 

In another article concerning the lies of Karen Armstrong, and the lies against Muammar Gadhafi since the beginning of the NATO bombardment of Libya, we dealt with the moral crisis in the capitalist system.

 

They cannot keep their word (to an ally like Gadhafi)

 

They cannot keep their own White House clean (from a low life like “Common” which is the nickname of this rapper Michele Obama invited in). At least Jackie Kennedy had some love for art. It tells a lot about the stage of capitalist crisis we are in.

 

So this article, driven on the Atlas Shrugs site, is very interesting to me.

 

There is a moral crisis going on in the world.

 

I mean if Michelle Obama presents this low life rapper as art then why not present Sharia as a political moral alternative.

 

And why not break our word to Mubarak, and to Muammar Gadhafi, having given it 10 years before, and after both those men acted in good faith on that word.

 

I think the issues are made clear in the following, mainly by Atlas Shrugs.

 

 

 

 

 

There is a clear link between all of these issues:

 

  1. The continual bombing of Libya by NATO, in which the word of the west to Gadhafi, and the agreement of the west with Gadhafi, has been totally broken. Now NATO is bombing Libya on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood
  2. Obama is a big problem for the world. Obama insisted on destroying Mubarak in Egypt and now the new military government, which relies on and is working clasely with the very powerful Muslim Brotherhood there, is opening up the gate to Hamas, and is threatening huge warfare on the Jewish state
  3. Obama again, big problem for Israel, because Obama always advised slowly slowly nice nice with Assad. But the main businessman and speaking for Assad has threatened direct war on Israel, the anti-Semites are overjoyed, but if Israel is threatened like this watch those nukes fly. Those ex pats on the Costas in Spain, at present sunning their asses by their pools, will soon have nukes to warm them up!
  4. The lies, the lies, the lies! From Srebrenica, from hajj Amin el Husseini, from links of same to Izetbegovic, from Karen Armstrong, from Muhammed el Dura affair, from Cameron on Gadhafi, from “Responsibility to protect giant lie, lies of Cair and Muslim groups in Britain, we live in a sea of deceit

It is a big, big issue for us on 4international and wedefendistrael. Also our own history, Leon Trotsky was the most lied about and lied against man on the planet, lies that led to his murder.

 

How to proceed? Above all there must be a discussion and there must be protection of the discussion.

ALL OF THESE POINTS IN THIS ARTICLE MUST BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE REALITY FACED BY JEWS EVERYWHERE AND BY ISRAEL

DUE TO THESE POLICIES BY OBAMA ISRAEL FACES WAR FROM THE EGYPT HIZBULLAH HAMAS IRAN AXIS, AND IN A NEW WAY FROM THE DESPARATE ASSAD SYRIA AXIS

ABOVE ALL OBAMA THREATENS ISRAEL IN EVERYTHING HE DOES

OBAMA A DANGER TO ISRAEL NEXT

ISRAEL IS IN GREAT DANGER BECAUSE ANTISEMITISM IS NOT A LOGICAL THOUGHT SYSTEM

by Felix Quigley

23 December, 2009

It is very important to puncture the idea that the Arabs have been motivated by anti imperialism. What they were motivated by was good, old fashioned anti Jew hatred.

Leon Trotsky was asked what was his political position towards the 1929 Arab attacks against the Jews?:

He answered that he had not yet studied the issue adequately and that he was in the process of doing so. That he did not know what elements were involved, anti British feeling in other words anti imperialism, (I paraphrase) or whether it was the hatred of the Arab, Islam [using specifically the word “Mohammedans”] for Jews, in other words anti-Semitism.

Francisco Gil White made a very thorough study of this and his study cuts the ground from under the anti imperialist part of the answer of Trotsky.

That the Arabs are anti imperialist is a dominant theme inside the revisionist Left now and for a long time past. It is a strange concept because it is blatantly obvious that the ruling capitalist class governments of every country under the sun are up to their necks in collaboration with the Arab rulers.

So when the revisionist Left come forward and also support the Arabs they are singing from the same hymn sheet as their own governments. Some Left!

The most that you can say about the Arab regimes is that they are also imperialist and that they are competing with other imperialist powers on a world stage. And this fits the bill because we know that Islam conquered half the known world and was a bloody and an imperialist force. Yet the US with EU is the dominant force. One does not negate the other.

In order to make Islam or Arabs in to anti imperial forces the revisionist Left really have to invent this in their own heads. Make it fit their own schema, and this is what Nathan Weinstock was doing, thus Gil White was correct to tackle Nathan Weinstock head on

[Begin quote from Francisco Gil White here]

As you may recall from Part 1, even anti-Zionist historian Nathan Weinstock recognizes that the ‘Palestinian movement’ in British Mandate ‘Palestine’ was not exactly admirable. It was, he says, “deformed by racism.” Racism against whom? The British? That should be the first hypothesis for a movement that Weinstock calls “the Palestinian anti-colonialist movement,” because the British were the occupying imperialist/colonialist power in charge. But no, as Weinstock himself concedes, this movement was racist against the Jews (Zionist or not, mind you). Weinstock’s admission that the ‘Palestinian’ movement’s flag was anti-Jewish racism is important because it comes from someone who would like to defend the justice of this movement.

Precisely in order to defend this movement, Nathan Weinstock would like you to think that the violent racism of so-called ‘Palestinian’ Arabs was “understandable” because, he claims, the Zionist Jews and the British were “clearly” allied with each other against the Arabs (see Part 1). This representation is absurd. As Weinstock himself admits,

1) the British imperialists were helping the Arabs kill Jews (see Part 1 for Weinstock’s admission; British support for anti-Jewish terrorist violence is documented below);

and as Weinstock also admits,

2) the Arab feudal lords in ‘Palestine’ incited racist violence against the Jews in order to create a climate to intimidate fellow Arabs who might want to get along with the mostly socialist Jews, the better to further exploit the downtrodden Arab commoners (see Part 3)

Therefore, it is amazing that Weinstock, who says he is an anti-imperialist Marxist, should not defend the interpretation that the British ruling class and the Arab ruling class were allied against ordinary Arabs and Jews. After all, as I also show in Part 3, the Zionist Jews had no role in oppressing the Arabs; on the contrary, the Zionist Jews were indirectly and directly helping to end the oppression which the Arab (effendi) feudal lords made the ordinary (fellahin) peasant Arabs to suffer.

Nathan Weinstock would also like you to think that this allegedly ‘Palestinian’ movement was an expression of a Palestinian Arab “national consciousness.” But this is quite impossible. As I show in Part 1, the ideology of this movement was just plain old anti-Jewish racism, of the traditional sort in the Muslim world, and quite comparable — notwithstanding Weinstock’s loud protestations to the contrary — to the traditional European anti-Jewish racism that produced the Shoah (Holocaust). Moreover, as I show in Part 2, ‘Palestine’ as such never existed, and neither was there ever any such thing as an ‘Arab Palestinian’ population with a ‘Palestinian identity,’ much less Weinstock’s alleged “national consciousness.” Most of the so-called ‘Palestinian Arabs,’ as I also show in Part 2, were immigrants from elsewhere attracted by the economic boom that the Zionist Jews created when they transformed a desolate land into an oasis (few people are even aware of this).

So, although Nathan Weinstock may refer to the racist movement that killed innocent Jews in British Mandate ‘Palestine’ as the “Palestinian anti-colonialist movement,” the well-documented facts suggest that this movement had absolutely nothing to do with fighting colonialism. On the contrary, the aristocratic Arab leaders of repeated terrorist violence against ordinary Arabs and Jews were directly sponsored and assisted by the colonialist British Mandate government and the colonialist British military, as I will document below in some detail. It was this British sponsorship and assistance that initially set in motion the so-called ‘Palestinian movement.’ Later, the Nazis would also sponsor it. And after that, the United States.

Anybody who chooses to defend the ‘Palestinian movement’ should do so in full awareness of the facts documented below.

[End quote from Gil White here]

The above is from an article titled “How did the Palestinian movement emerge? The British sponsored it. Then the German Nazis, and the US”

Find it on the following url

http://www.hirhome.com/israel/pal_mov4.htm  

Gil White does then an outstanding job in showing how German and Italian Nazi propaganda against the Jews flooded the Middle East and all Arab countries. There was machinery in place and a structure that enabled this.

Gil White tells of how the German Government of Hitler was flooded with congratulations when and because it had passed the Nuremburg Laws, congratulations coming from all parts of the Arab world.

A question related to this must be answered. Why did the Nazi propaganda against Jews receive such a ready hearing in the Arab countries? Is there something connected to being an Arab that enabled the Nazi propaganda to be effective?

This brings to the question of Islam, the ideology which drives the Arab movement. John Bostom and Robert Spencer in their knowledge of the Koran have done important work which helps to answer this question. [We will examine their work later]

The study of this 1930s period and how the Arab world mobilized against the Jews is of great importance to the present. Instead of there being a Fascist movement as there was Hitler and Mussolini, there is today another Fascist movement, which is strangely enough concentrated outside Israel in the combined and united efforts of the revisionist “Left”, really a Fascist Nazi type movement in its anti-Semitic ideology, linked up with the openly Fascist anti-Semitic Islam which is operating like a rash in all countries, especially in countries in Europe, where the invective against Jews is strongest. You can see this Fascist movement of the revisionist “left” as they attempt to isolate and destroy the Jewish Homeland with their urgings for boycott, also in the caravans and boat sailings to break the “siege” of Gaza. They help and hand over money to a Jew killing and Jew hating movement in Hamas in Gaza, while Fatah’s exactly the same, although some very stupid Israeli Jews seek to work with Fatah. Meanwhile state governments such as that of Bush and Obama have been in alliance with Arabs and Islam against the Jewish Homeland. The aim is to bring the Jewish Homeland down. There can be no other aim because these are not stupid people.

Over the past 20 years the Iranian regime has made many threats to destroy Israel. Yet we hear people who argue in the west that Iran does not pose any threat to Israel. Just last week Iran has perfected a very advanced rocket which can reach Israel. There is no outcry. It seems that public opinion has been conditioned by many events and much propaganda to be totally blasé at the thought of Israel being struck by a Nuclear Bomb.

The world thus is not obsessed with the thought of Israel being hit by a Nuclear Bomb and the deaths of millions, which actually would include many Arabs as well. The world is obsessed with the war which Israel fought against Hamas, a war that was forced on to Israel, which it tried to avoid for many years. Even an imbecile should be able to see that.

Very alarming is the position of the trade unions, who on this issue are part of this Fascist force we mentioned above, even though Fascism will scrap all union organization. As we shall see later anti-Semitism is blind in its fury! The Fascist and Nazi British Trade Union Congress passes a resolution to isolate Israel, at this time! British unions are a strange ideological concoction but…There are shades here of the pact which Stalin made with Hitler in 1939.

Some reading I have been doing centres on references to a German Nazi called Rudolf Hoss

I will jot some points down now and edit them on Monday…

Rudolf Hoss, the Commandant of the largest concentration camp in Poland, was in 1942 called to a meeting with Himmler and was told that the Fuhrer had given the order for “a final solution of the Jewish Question”

“We the SS must carry out that order. If it is not carried out now the Jews will later on destroy the German people”

[Page 702, Hitler, by John Toland]

The parallel is clear

Everybody seems to discard the lies that Iran has been caught out in spreading. The Iran Government was caught out hiding the secret plant in Qom. They have also been caught out contradicting each other. Yet there are many people who believe Iran when it says it is looking for peaceful nuclear targets. They are expecting Iran to be telling the truth and not expecting Iran to be liars. The only answer for this psychosis is that people have been already indoctrinated in to a great hatred for Israel.

Back to Toland

“The decision taken the Fuhrer made it known to those entrusted with the Final Solution that the killings should be done as humanely as possible”

[Page 703, Hitler by John Toland]

The horror of this statement is explained by Toland, and it is alarming.

Toland explains that Hitler was under the influence of Christian antisemitism, and felt that he was doing their work in eliminating this “menace” to humanity, the Jews.

It is very similar to the speeches of Ahmadinejad re Zionists, the same thing really

Toland quotes Hitler directly

“I am now as before a catholic, and will always remain so”

Toland

“…he carried within him its teaching that the Jew was the killer of God”

“…The extermination therefore could be done without a twinge of conscience since he was merely acting as the avenging hand of God so long as it was done impersonally without cruelty

There is an almost exact parallel from the Hitler of 1941 to the Ahmadinejad and the Revolutionary Guards of today. The religion is different but the concept is the same.

Hitler was operating in the midst of incredible losses in the Russian Front.

Up to February 20, 1942…199,448 dead, 708,351 wounded, 112, 627 frostbite!

These pages by Toland are very important because it is shown that no matter that the Germans were being threshed by the Russians, and this had a serious effect on Hitler, his health, his manner, his appearance, yet he did not ever lose sight of the extermination of the Jews

“My prophesy shall be fulfilled that this war will not destroy Aryan humanity but it will destroy the Jew. Whatever the battle may bring in its course or however long ity may last, that will be its final course”

Toland Page 709

Toland perceptively adds to this the following

“The elimination of Jewry overrode victory itself”

In conclusion I believe that something very similar is happening around the personage of Ahmadinejad and the crazy chaos inducing Mahdi returning bullshit of the Shia religion of Islam that is driving Ahmadinejad on to create a great massacre of the Jews, the meaning of his drive for Nuclear arms, in order to do just that.

It is well to remember at this time that Hitler emerged right out of the Christian ethos and that the ground for the Holocaust was laid long before.

HOLOCAUST DENIAL LIES AT THE CENTRE OF MUCH REACTION TODAY…ESPECIALLY ON THE “LEFT”

by Felix Quigley

April 23, 2009

Joshua Rosenburg has drawn attention to a recent article by Carl Savich which deals with the antics of a very notorious character (His name is Marko Attila Hoare) and associate of Oliver Kamm of the Times of London, also a close associate of the equally notorious Harry´s Place website. We deal once again with this man going under the very peculiar name, let me repeat it for effect, in case our readers are unfamiliar…Marko Attila Hoare !

This study is all the more important because it deals with aspects of Holocaust Denial.

[Begin study of Marko Attila Hoare here]

British Marxist, anti-Serbian nutjob & former Hague ICTY/NATO employee, Marko Attila Hoare and the Monty Python “Heinrich Himmler” sketch faux pas.

Hoare  is again proven an egregious liar about Alija Izetbegovic’s resurrected Bosnian Muslim Nazi “Handschar” [aka “Handzar”] division in this great article by Serbian-American historian, Carl Savich.

“Fact versus Delusional Fantasy: The Bosnian Muslim Government Reformed the Nazi SS Division Handzar”
http://serbianna.com/blogs/savich/?p=518
April 19, 2009 – 12:58 pm
Marko Attila Hoare rejects and suppresses this factual image of Bosnian history in favor of a fantasy or delusional image from a television comedy. The real Heinrich Himmler (Heimlich Bimmler) reviewing the real or “historical” Bosnian Muslim Nazi SS Division Handzar, 1943.

Did the Bosnian Muslim Army and Government reform or recreate the infamous Nazi SS Division Handzar or not? Based on Martko Attila Hoare’s response to my article, Hoare now concedes that, indeed, there was a formation in the Bosnian Muslim Army termed the “Handzar Division”.

Let me reiterate that. Hoare admitted that the Bosnian Muslim Government did indeed reform the Handzar Nazi SS Division of World War II. When you cut through and deconstruct all the indeologically-driven claptrap, innuendo, ad hominen, personal attacks, this is the conclusion that he reaches.

Hoare is so caught up in his own arrogance and conceit that he does not even notice that he admitted this fact.

The issue or question is and always was: Did the Bosnian Muslim Government have a unit in its ranks known as the Handzar Division? Hoare’s reply is: Yes.

 

Marko Attila Hoare used this fantasy image to illustrate his article on the reformed Bosnian Muslim Handzar Nazi SS Division. Michael Palin is shown as Heimlich Bimmler (Heinrich Himmler), John Cleese as Mr. Hilter (Adolf Hitler), and Graham Chapman as Ron Vibbentrop (Joachim von Ribbentrop), from a 1970 episode of Monty Python’s Flying Circus. Reality is rejected over delusional fantasy constructs.

Hoare, nevertheless, convinces himself that he was “vindicated” in denying the existence of the reformed Handzar Division. How does he do this? His rebuttal consists of challenging the strength of the reformed Handzar Division. Now that he admits that it existed, he now challenges the size of the formation. His argument is:  The reformed Handzar Division did exist, as you claimed, but it was very small. It was a little bitty Nazi SS Division, not a big bad full-sized Nazi SS Division!

monty_python_hitler_in_england

The Holocaust as joke? Michael Palin as Heimlich Bimmler (Heinrich Himmler) in a 1970 comedy sketch. Isn’t Hoare a Holocaust denier? Fact: Bosnian Muslims, Albanian Muslims, and Croats played a role in the real Holocaust.

But is this a valid argument? Is someone pregnant or not? Can you be pregnant by degree? Is someone dead or not? Can you be only dead to a small degree? Did the Bosnian Muslim Army recreate the Handzar Division or not? This requires a simple yes or no answer. What Hoare initially challenged and questioned was the existence of the division. To be sure, he hedged his bets and cheated by conceding that the division might exist “conceivably” but that its number was small in size.

Hoare hedged his bets this way: “[I]t is conceivable that there really was a handful of Muslim zealots who, during the recent war, fought on the Bosnian side and grandiloquently named themselves the ‘Handžar Division’ after this historic unit.”

Hoare, in essence, denied that the division existed at all. This was the gist of his article. Now he admits and concedes that it, in fact, existed. Now he argues that the unit or formation was a small one. It is hard to pinpoint exactly what he claimed because he constantly changes his arguments and contentions.

Fact versus delusional fantasy? This is a factual image of the real Henrich Himmler (Heimlich Bimmler) with the real Bosnian Muslim Nazi SS Division Hnadzar which Hoare has suppressed and repressed. Delusional fantasy is more reassuring than factual reality.

A fair characterization of his initial argument was that there was no evidence for the reformation of the Handzar Division. The eyewitness account of military analyst and journalist Robert Fox was deemed not credible. Hoare disingenuously hedged his argument by claiming that “conceivably” it could have existed. The way to translate this argument is:  No, the Handzar Division was not reformed. But, nevertheless, it is possible it may have been reformed. Of course, this is nonsensical and absurd.
 
Hoare then concluded: “Monty Python is a much better source for accurate historical information than Neil Clark and his comrades.”

So was the Handzar Division reformed or not? In his rebuttal to my article, Hoare now admits that the Handzar Division was reformed. He again hedges his bets by claiming this time that it was a small unit formed by “zealots”. But, again, the size of the unit or formation was never the question or issue. If there was a small unit or formation in the U.S. Army or British Army termed the “Adolf Hitler Regiment” or “Das Reich Division”, would it be relevant or material that the unit in question was only made up of “a handful” of “zealots”? Now that the existence of the unit is accepted and acknowledged, the issue shifts to the size of the unit, which is unknown.

Hoare concluded:  “It would seem that the ‘Handžar Division’,  confidently described as numbering ‘about 6,000 troops’ by our friend, does indeed turn out to be a bit smaller when the available evidence is examined closely.”

Hoare here mischaracterized Fox’s original statement by quoting my  estimate of the strength of the unit. Fox stated that UN peacekeeping “officers” had told him that the reformed “Handzar Division” was “up to 6,000-strong.” Fox emphazied that the strength of the unit was an approximation or estimate made by UN observers. Fox refers to the formation as a “unit” and as an element of the Bosnian army. Hoare ignores this explicit language and now argues that Fox claimed that the reformed unit consisted of “about 6,000 troops”.  But nowhere does Fox state that the unit was made up of 6,000 troops. The phrase “up to 6,000-strong” could encompass any number from one member to 6,000 members. Moreover, Hoare ignored that fact that Fox referred to the formation as a “unit” in his report leaving the actual size open to debate. Fox referred to the members of the unit as “Handzars” and as “[h]ardline elements of the Bosnian army, like Handzar.” Fox wrote that the formation was a “unit” of the Bosnian army similar to other units: “The Handzars are working closely with other units around Fojnica. ” But even at 6,000 men, it would only have ranked as a regiment or brigade, which usually consist of up to 5,000 men, not a division, which is generally accepted as a formation of 10,000 men or more.  In short, the focus or emphasis of the Fox report was the existence of the unit, not the size, on which issue Fox only proffered a potential maximum figure that was based on a UN estimate.

Finally, Hoare rejected Fox’s 1993 news report from the London Daily Telegraph out of hand, but this was not done by the Republican Policy Committee of the United States Senate, which cited Fox’s report as credible and accurate. In a January 16, 1997 report, the Committee, chaired at the time by U.S. Senator Larry E. Craig, Republican from Idaho, noted that  “there exists another group known as the Handzar (’dagger’ or ’scimitar’) Division” and quoted from Fox’s report. Thus, members of the U.S. Senate, tasked with safeguarding the lives of U.S. troops, found Fox’s report to be factual, credible, and accurate. Only Marko Attila Hoare questioned the veracity and accuracy of the Fox report. Absurdly, the Bosnian Muslim Government or Army never denied the existence of the reformed “Handzar Division”. Only Hoare has done this. At the war crimes trials of Bosnian Muslim military commanders at the ICTY, the existence of the “Handzar Division” as part of the Bosnian Muslim Army is openly acknowledged and detailed.

The translation is: The Bosnian Muslim Government of Alija Izetbegovic reformed the Nazi SS Division Handzar during the 1992-1995 civil war. This is the only logical conclusion when one cuts through all of Hoare’s labels and propagandistic nomenclature.

Hoare uses a bevy of labels to do the thinking for him: “Serb-nationalists” (yes, with a hyphen!), “Milosevic supporters” (at least Hoare gets the correct pronunciation of his name with the correct Serbo-Croat form of his name), “Islamofascist” (no hyphen, a neologism popular after 9-11), “members of a US-based circle of Milosevic supporters and Srebrenica deniers” (an analogy with Holocaust deniers), “Great Serbia” (a propaganda term coined by Austria-Hungary before World War I), “ex-Maoist” (is that a good or a bad thing?), “Milosevic-supporting, Srebrenica-denying website” (hyphenated now, denoting an activity), “all good Chomskyites” (are there such people as “Chomskyites” out there?), “Serb nationalists and their supporters” (no hyphen;  do “Serb nationalists” have supporters?), “Serb nationalists and their fellow travellers”  (didn’t this term go out with the Joseph McCarthy Communist Witch Hunts during the 1950s Red Scare?), and “the Great Serbia supporters”.

How can one explain this plethora of labels? Why does Hoare use such preposterous and risible labels? We use labels to preclude thought or thinking. Labels are a shortcut to thinking and intellectual debate or discusiion. In fact, labels are meant to preclude or prevent any thought at all. This is why Hoare uses labels. They are mindless and senseless. Why use them then? In essence, Hoare does not want to debate or discuss these issues rationally or logically. He thus engages in the use of labels, what is termed “name calling” in propaganda analysis.  In propaganda, we use “pulpit words” or “glittering words” to describe ourselves and our own actions and the opposite words to describe our opponents. In short, Hoare wants to preclude any thought or debate. This is why he resorts to such propagandistic words. There is no thought or thinking going on, no discussion or debate or dialectic. There is only a stream of pre-selected labels or prejudiced or loaded words. It is like when Polonius asked Hamlet what he was reading:  “Polonius: What do you read, my lord? Hamlet: Words, words, words.”

The case is closed. As Detective Steve McGarrett would say to Detective Danny Williams, “Book ‘em, Danno!”

[end study of Marko Attila Hoare here]

The great strength of this study is that it shows that Marko Attila Hoare is responsible for a great revision of history, which is essentially what he does when he makes a joke about an aspect of the Holocaust in the Balkans.

Let us be very clear here. The Handzar division was a Nazi SS Division, and was created out of the forces of Islam in the Balkans.

To deny that is bad, but to deny as Hoare does that that was recreated by Izetbegovic is the most dangerous of all.

Because if you do that then you are saying that the study by Christopher Simpson in “Blowback” and in all the studies of the actions and words of Ahmadinejad in the present are of no relevance.

That another Holocaust is not possible!

That is the great fact that all on this British Imperialist Labourist wing surrounding Kamm, Harry´s Place, the British Media in total except for one noted journalist Eve Ann Prentice, worked might and main to keep hidden during the 90s and indeed since to this very day!

And that is where the Savich claim about Marko Attila Hoare Holocaust Denial is located. They are all guilty of this.

We on 4international have also met Jewish people who did not want to know about this aspect of history, or like Bill Narvey of Israpundit claimed that it had no relevance to today.

We also think that at the centre of all of the Fascist Leftist posturing of today on Israel lies a deep form of Holocaust Denial.

Behind the antics of people like Sinead Cusack now canvassing for her Israel hating son today in Ireland and wider is another form of truth denial, because what is denied is the situation of the Shoah which made it imperative to found Israel.

In fact all attacks that I see being made on Israel today, whether it is in Fatah and Abbas, in Hamas, in Hizbullah, or Iran…all are forms of Holocaust Denial.

There is another distortion which I would like our readers to understand acutely.

It was Leon Trotsky who emerged in the 1930s as the greatest advocate for Jewish nationalism, which he promoted because he had made a deep study of Fascism, and saw the great danger to the Jews from the Nazis.

For some reason the Lefts and “Trotskyists” have also hidden this aspect of history.

And in a strange way these things have come back together again in the grave danger to the Jews of Israel and all the Jews in the Diaspora from a combination of Fascist Islam and Fascist US Foreign policy (of Bush and Obama)

While we on 4international alone continue to fight to defend the Jews of Israel and insist that Israel has no choice but to wage war on the Iranian Nuclear agenda.

We do not wish this. But like Trotsky in the 1930s we are realistic and we try to emulate the realism of Trotsky re 1930s Fascism in the situation of today.

The essence of Hoare, and essentially also of Harry´s Place, Nick Cohen, Maggie O´Kane et al, in the following

The reformed Handzar Division did exist, as you claimed, but it was very small. It was a little bitty Nazi SS Division, not a big bad full-sized Nazi SS Division!

In their analysis of Marko Attila Hoare, in their insisting on his attempts of making a joke out of the Holocaust in the Balkans showing him as a real danger to Jewish people, Joshua and Carl have brought us a great deal further forward.

ANTISEMITISM OF A VERY DEVELOPED NATURE RAVAGES OUR LIVES

by Felix Quigley

March 30, 2009

It is not just Obama that is the problem for Israel although he is indeed a deadly problem. There is every chance that Obama has been recruited by the CIA from an early stage and that this Nazi created organization has groomed Obama for this present stage in the unprecedented economic crisis of US Imperialism.

People in general do not give enough attention to the ability of the ruling capitalist or imperialist class (some use the word “elite”) to think ahead and to plan, planning which is sometimes measured in decades.

This was brought home to Irish nationalists when it became apparent that the very top leaders in Sinn Fein, I mean the ones who are sitting today at the very top of the Stormont Good Friday Government along with the right neanderthals of Paisley, were paid money as young people and kept on the rolls of British Intelligence.

You seldom have firm proof of these things. But you can work it out by people´s actions. It just seems odd that Obama comes along at this point to promote the deadly Islam.

This is an attempt by Ted Belman the editor of Israpundit to come to terms with these deadly for Israel developments.

[Begin analysis by Ted Belman here]

NYT: Give the Palestinians what they want or else.

By Ted Belman

As the Netanyahu government nears completion, everyone is piling on the pressure to succumb to Palestinian demands. The EU made it clear again, if Israel rejects the two-state solution, it wont be business as usual between Israel and the EU.

Yesterday the NY Times, the publisher of the antisemitc Oliphant cartoon, editorialized,

    It will not be that hard to judge by his deeds, and relatively soon, whether Mr. Netanyahu is serious about seeking peace with the Palestinians. His government is expected to win parliamentary approval next week.

    After that, we suggest that he start with freezing further settlement construction and expansion in the West Bank, as Israel has so often promised but failed to do. He should lift roadblocks between Palestinian cities and towns that are not needed for security. In East Jerusalem, he should stop the humiliating eviction of Palestinians. And in Gaza, he must expand exceptions to the blockade to allow the import of cement and reconstruction materials.  

    If Mr. Netanyahu is serious about being a partner for peace, he will not get in the way of the militant group Hamas entering a Palestinian unity government with the rival Fatah faction — as long as that government is committed to preventing terrorism and accepts past agreements between Israel and the Palestinians. He will recognize that the United States has its own interests in diplomacy with Syria, Iran and the Palestinians — and allow the Obama administration the freedom to pursue them. He also will not start a preventive war with Iran. [..]

    As The Times’s Ethan Bronner reported, Israel is increasingly isolated and facing its worst diplomatic crisis in two decades following its Gaza war. Mr. Netanyahu has understandably raised alarms with the expectation that his foreign minister will be an ultranationalist leader with what are widely considered to be anti-Arab views. Failing to pursue peace talks with the Palestinians would only make things worse by causing frictions with the new Obama administration and with Europe.

Essentially what the Times and the EU are saying is, don’t bother me with the niceties, just give the Palestinians what they want. Gone is the pretext that the US or the EU won’t compromise Israel’s security. Gone is the commitment of the Quartet to allow the parties to negotiate the terms of the agreement.

In its place is the demand, nay the threat, give the Palestinians what they want or else. No demands are made on the Palestinians.

The Times suggests that Israel is controlling America, preventing it from pursuing its interests. Its that damned lobby again. More ominous is the idea that the US, if constraints were removed in Congress, could cut a deal with Syria and Iran. Or are they also suggesting that if Israel doesn’t provide the US with bargaining chips, such as the Golan, then Israel is preventing the US from pursuing its interests.

The NYT lowers the bar for acceptance of Hamas to the level that they accept former agreements. Hamas prefers to only “respect” them. No where is there a demand that they honour them. Netanyahu has committed to abide by all Israel’s signed agreements, which by the way do not include the Roadmap which is a blueprint and not an agreement. The NYT wants more from Israel than that it honour all agreements. It wants her to make new agreements. It certainly doesn’t expect the Palestinians to honour their agreements.

This attack by the EU and the NYT culminates a long standing plan of the State Department and others to impose peace. It started with the insertion of the Saudi Plan into the Roadmap. It continued with the publication of The Israel Lobby and the prosecution of Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman of AIPAC. Four years ago, I wrote “Viable State” trumps “secure borders” in which I took the position that the Saudi Plan was the State Department Plan. A few months after this article I commented

    “Friends of Israel should recognize reality here. Israel is merely going through the motions of negotiating and agreeing or disagreeing while the reality is that the outcome has been predetermined and forced on Israel.”.

The selection of Gen Jones and Samantha Power to serve in the Obama administration is further evidence of the long standing plan to force the Saudi Plan on Israel. It is no accident that during the period when Netanyahu was forming his government the attacks reached a crescendo to affect the makeup of the ultimate coalition. Just a day before the above noted editorial appeared, the NYT published a Op-Ed by Roger Cohen in the New York Times (The Fierce Urgency of Peace), advising on the right way to deal with Israel, based on a “Bipartisan Statement on U.S. Middle East Peacemaking.”. This report enshrined the thinking of Power and Jones as to the terms of the settlement and how to get there.

In Obama’s recent press conference he said “.. the status quo is unsustainable. That it is critical for us to advance a two-state solution”.

Yet it is critical that Israel not advance the two state solution especially on Palestinian terms.

The pressure applied to Netanyahu will be unbearable.

http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=11585#more-11585

It became clear to us on 4international that the event of the Gaza War brought all of the antisemites of Western Europe, the US and even Canada, out into the open. Calling themselves the “left” (but not really left at all, be advised) they marched along with Arabs and Islamists behind banners and slogans which were evidently and obviously antisemitic.

This is the new Nazism. It is the new antisemitism. It takes many forms indeed.

In my own experience here are a few.

Journalists who are attacking Israel over the Gaza war but who are totally quiet about the 8000 rockets which were hitting Israel for 8 years.

People who are quiet over the fact that Hamas is a Holocaust denying organization.

These are the new Nazis no matter how polite they may sound, and even though some may speak in clipped upper class English accents.

On the San Francisco march strode a woman and her two pretty children behind a banner which it appeared they wrote themselves. “Jews are Murderers” they proclaimed to the world. And it looked as if they thought this was normal.

On the Toronto march a number of Jews who gathered in a counter-demonstration were told by the Toronto police they could not be protected by the police and it was safer for these Jews to go home, and presumably stay at home!

This is of course antisemitism of a very developed nature.

So we are grateful to Ted Belman for introducing the subject. This must indeed be the basis for much discussion on the way forward for Israel.

THIS JEW HATRED TODAY IS PREPARING THE GROUND FOR A NEW HOLOCAUST OF THE JEWS

by Felix Quigley

February 26, 2009

We on 4international stand totally behind the Jews of the world and of their Homeland Israel.

There has been a huge rise in antisemitism in every part of the world. In Paris 2 years ago a young Jewish person was murdered. In Paris in recent weeks during the Gaza War there has been a massive increase in attacks on Jews.

One of the results is that in Paris the home of the Renaissance Jews have been advised not to go out on the streets after 7 oclock in the evening, and that they should not appear as Jew, meaning to watch what they wear and how they look, headgear etc.

This is due to 2 things.

One is the massive influx of Arabs into France, Arabs who are really Islamists. They are carrying on an invective against Israel.

The second is the role of the modern Media. It was seen in the Mohammed El Durra France 2 affair that the French Media was totally hostile to Israel.

Consequently these antisemitic Arabs in Paris have an unchallenged right to attack Israel politically and Jews physically. Along with that movements which call themselves erroneously “Leftist” are fully joined at the hip with Islam; Marx Lenin and Trotsky are spinning in their graves I am sorry to say.

 

All of these things mean a huge increase in the level of antisemitism.

One of the very worst things which came to a head during the Gaza war was the intense propaganda against Israel. I live in Spain and it was coming from all sides, from the Media and from confused Spanish people, confused by the lies of the Media

Let me go over a few things.

 

1. The Jews withdrew from Gaza. I mean every single last Jew left Gaza and handed the area over to the Arabs. The Jews even left the Arabs property such as green houses which could be used by the Arabs to help them on their way. The Jews also even left synagogues which stripped of the contents Jews look on as mere buildings. But they were sound concrete structures. They could have been used as youth clubs. The Arabs tore them down stone by stone.

2. But then the Arabs of Gaza promptly elected a Fascist Nazi movement of Jew killers, Hamas, who then stepped up their attacks on Israel. Materially with rockets. Verbally by calls to wipe Israel off the map etc. (They are supporters of Ahmadinejad)

IT CAME DOWN TO A CONCRETE PROBLEM…HOW COULD THE JEWS STOP THE ROCKETS

So basically Israel had to decide how to stop the rockets. It is a fact that the Israeli Labourist Kadima Government members were very weak and unpatriotic and allowed Jews to suffer these rockets for many years.

Still that is not my point here.

Those who have attacked Israel must say 2 things

 

1. They must say that Israel has to simply absorb these rocket attacks on their state. This is antisemitism in action. Is that not clear!

2. They must say that Israel must give in to these attacks on its people and follow the agenda of these antisemitic Arab terrorists which means

*pack up their bags and leaving their Homeland set out on their travels around the world once more as a stateless people

*return to the lines of 1967, from where they were attacked actually in 1967 by Nasser and the other Arab states. So why?

Both of these are also obviously antisemitic suggestions to put to Jews.

 

Becoming again a persecuted people is antisemitic suggestion. No?

Returning to lines which the Arabs used to attack before is antisemitic suggestion as well. No?

And in our next part we will look at some of these antisemitic ideas in action in the West of today.

I take the following from the Harry´s Place website despite certain differences with the organizers there

In the first they take a quote from the notorious Israel hater George Galloway. Here Galloway is comparing the Jews to nazis.

“In April and May of 1943, the Jews of the Warsaw Ghetto were surrounded by barbed wire fences, by the occupiers of Poland, and they faced a choice, in the words of the song of the partisans: ‘They could die on their knees or they could live forever’. And they chose to rise up against their occupier, to use their bodies as weapons, to dig tunnels, to fight, not to die in ones and twos of hunger and typhus, but to die as free men and women. Today, the Palestinian people in Gaza are the new Warsaw Ghetto, and those who are murdering them are the equivalent of those who murdered the Jews in Warsaw in 1943.”

So in that quote from Galloway it is clear that the Palestinians of Gaza are the Jews of the Holocaust and that the Jews today of tiny Israel are the Nazis

And the same kind of thing is seen in the next set of pictures. There is the attack on Jews as being Nazis and carrying out a Holocaust of the Arabs.

But 1300 Arabs were killed and Hamas killed some of these through executions etc. Also Hamas set up so that the Israelis had to kill civilian Arabs. I mean it is quite possible to do this.

The British Muslim Initiative, one of the organisers of the demonstrations, put it on their placards:

bmi

As did the Palestinian Forum in Britain:

pfb

So this is conscious.

This is an attempt to make the Jews of Israel out to be Nazis.

And this we argue on this site is the preparation for a new Holocaust of the Jews. Nothing ever is as it seems. And when people argue that the Jews are the Nazis of today then that is going to result in a Holocaust of the Jews.

 

It is such an enormous lie that it must have the most severe intent and implications.

RESEARCH BY TENC SHOWS DANGER OF NASRULLAH ANTISEMITISM

by Felix Quigley

September 1, 2008

We have been looking at how antisemites are trying to stir up hatred against the Jews by laying the blame for the Iraqi war on Israel and the Jews.

This has been retrieved from the Archives by Jared Israel of Emperors New Clothes and is totally relevant to what these antisemites are doing. Remember that various antisemitic groups like the SWP marched through London shouting “We are all Hizbullah now”.

[Start quote here]

Nasrallah alleges ‘Christian Zionist’ plot
‘Their aim is to redraw the world’s political map’

By Badih Chayban
Special to The Daily Star
Wednesday, October 23, 2002

Hizbullah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said Tuesday that Arabs were not “red Indians” and will not be liquidated or driven into exile by Israel and the United States.

Speaking at a graduation ceremony in Haret Hreik, Nasrallah said that “Christian Zionists” were gaining strength and had a powerful impact on US foreign policy.

Nasrallah alleged that oil companies and weapons firms that have financed the “Christian Zionists,” the Arabic term for the right-wing Christian supporters of Israel, were in alliance in the United States.

“Their aim is to redraw the world’s political map,” he said. “It is said that several US presidents are affiliated with the Christian Zionists.”

Nasrallah said their aim was to return the Jews to Israel and rebuild their temple, destroyed by the Romans in 70AD, over the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

However, Nasrallah added, “if they (Jews) all gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of going after them worldwide.”

Nasrallah also spoke about US hegemony in the region, asserting that Washington had reached “a new level of insanity and arrogance.”

“Although the United States is powerful, it has its weaknesses,” he said.

Nasrallah also said that he was not threatened by a country that called itself “great,” and where its national security is threatened by one or two individuals, in apparent reference to Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.

http://www.dailystar.com.lb

Posted on http://tenc.net/a/graduation.htm

ANTISEMITES ARE BLAMING JEWS FOR THE BUSH IRAQ WAR

By Felix Quigley

September 1, 2008

There is a debate going on at Harry’s Place which it is NOT vital that you read. The debate concerns the anti Israel politics of a person called Joe Quinn. I personally know nothing about Quinn except that his politics are the same as the ISM and the IPSC. These are supporters of Palestinian Arab terrorists and the initials stand for International Solidarity Movement, and Irish Palestinian Solidarity Campaign.

Antisemitism in the so-called “Left” cannot be understood without examining Stalin and Stalinism, then also the degeneration caused by Tony Cliff, Mandel, Healy, Grant and others when they decided to support the “Palestinians”, not telling any of their mainly youthful members of the role of the Nazi Hajj Amin el Husseini in the creation of Palestinianism.

These Stalinists, so-called Trotskyists and of course the Imperialist Governments and Media have all worked together to hide the real history of Leon Trotsky, that in the 1930s the great socialist revolutionary was a serious supporter of the Jews setting up their Homeland, the to be Israel.

The Harry’s Place debate is on

http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/08/30/quinn-protests-im-talking-about-zionists-not-jews/#comments

Harry’s Place is staffed by British Imperialists and by US Imperialists who supported the destruction of Yugoslavia and lined up with Tudjman, the Islamofascist Izetbegovic and with the gangster terrorist organization the KLA.

The position of Harry’s Place on terror and antisemitism is bogus because the record shows that they supported the Nazi and member of the Muslim Brotherhood in Bosnia, Elija Izetbegovic.

It is one comment that I wish to focus upon. Somebody called MichaelD wrote the following which was in fact more antisemitic in content than was even Quinn. It was claiming in effect that the Jews (Israel) was responsible for the Bush war with Iraq. Continue reading

YAMIT82…NOBODY IS LAUGHING OUT LOUD

by Felix Quigley

Israpundit is a very important site for the Jewish people especially now that there has to be organized a great discussion on just how Israel can face up to its enemies.

The news which has emerged from a source within the talks going on between the Israeli ruling class of Livni and Olmert, with the Palestinian Arab fascists presided over by the US Imperialists of Bush, led in the talks by Rice, shows the enormous dangers which Israel and the lives of all Jews are in. This is why we on 4international are very critical of some of the discussions that are taking place there. The most recent issue is over the issue of apostasy and the general position of religion in the Jewish strugggle. Nobody really likes tackling this but it has to be tackled head on if we are to have the discussion necessary for the saving of Israel from its enemies. Continue reading

REPORT SHOWS GREAT DANGER TO ISRAEL…BUT ISRAPUNDIT BETRAYS

By Felix Quigley

Israel is now in the greatest danger that it has ever been in during all of its life. We on 4international have repeatedly emphasised that the way in which Yugoslavia was destroyed (wiped off the map) was through an alliance of American, British and German Imperialism which set up reactionary alliances with Fascist/Nazi entities within Yugoslavia. Those entities were the Fascists around Tudjman in Croatia, the Islamofascists in Bosnia around Izetbegovic, and the Thaci/Haradinaj Fascists and Stalinists of Kosovo. Weak on their own, nevertheless the role of US and NATO/EU Imperialism with all of its power, especially Military power linked to Media power, meant that the Serbs were isolated and defeated. Much of this went on behind the scenes, the public were not aware because the public always underestimates the role of conspiracy and secrecy in how the ruling Capitalist class works.

This is the great danger to the Jews today. Continue reading

THE RETURN OF FASCIST KILLER HARADINAJ

By Felix Quigley

On 4international we intend to follow this man. His name is Ramush Haradinaj, everybody knows he is a killer and has murdered in cold blood many ordinary Serb peasants and simple country folk, we on 4international have already proved that and have exposed the alliance of the US and EU Imperialists with this killer of Serbs, an alliance which goes to the very tops of the US Elite, to Bush, Lieberman, Cheney, Holbrooke and McCain. Continue reading

THE BANKRUPTCY OF SULTAN KNISH…TROTSKYISM WILL NOT BE SILENCED

by Felix Quigley

It is completely impossible to silence Trotskyism in this period because – just as in 1933 – only the policies and political programme of Leon Trotsky, the great Russian Revolutionary Socialist leader, could have saved the lives of 6 millions of Jews who were to perish at the hands of the Fascist Nazis. So therefore the recent horrific attack on Leon Trotsky by Sultan Knish just cannot stand. Continue reading

IMRA POLL REFUTES MANY LIES AGAINST ISRAEL

By Felix Quigley

On November 15, 2007 the results of a very important and comprehensive poll of Israeli Jewish people was taken. The people who carried out this poll were of the highest integrity. The results were interpreted by IMRA.  What is happening in the world today is massive lying about reality. We experienced this on the whole issue of Yugoslavia, it is happening in relation to China and Tibet, it is happening in relation to Russia and the encirclement of Russia by Bush’s US Imperialism, and it is happening in all of the lies told against Israel. Continue reading

US/NATO OWNED HAGUE ICTY KANGAROO COURT FREES KLA MASS MURDERER, RAMUSH HARADINAJ

Compiled by Nathan Pearlstein & Peter Robert North

Just a few days ago, the imperialist US/NATO owned and controlled ICTY Kangaroo Court in the Hague, Netherlands,  released the Islamist Nazi KLA mass murderer, Ramush Haradinaj. 

That they would do this was predicted in early 2005, by Gregory Copley, the president of the prestigious and world-renowned International Strategic Studies Association the parent organization of the Defense & Foreign Affairs group of publications, based in Alexandria, Virginia, in the Washington, D.C. area of the United States.  See their reports on ex-Yugoslavia here:

 http://128.121.186.47/ISSA/reports/Balkan/Balkanindex.htm

What follows is indisputable proof that the United States government – both Republican and Democrat administrations – planned IN ADVANCE all along the early release – or total immunity from prosecution – of virtually every one of the Islamist Nazi terrorist Albanian KLA mass murderers led by Hashim Thaci(e.g. Agim Ceku and Ramush Haradinaj); the Bosnian SDA Islamofascist murderers led by Alija Izetbegovic (e.g. Naser Oric in June 2006); and the Croatian Ustasha Nazi mass murderers led by the late Franjo Tudjman and Stipe Mesic (e.g. Ante Gotovina,Tomislav Mercep, Dobrosav Paraga ).

This repetitive US,NATO/EU intervention on behalf of Islamofascist/Nazi killers of innocent civilians in furtherance of Western geostrategic imperialism (expansion) in the Balkans – with the result being the European expansion of Fascist Islam – has very grave implications not just for the people of Serbia and the rest of Europe, but also grave implications for Israel and the Jewish people.

Ex-Clinton administration “peace envoy” Richard Holbrooke – beneficiary of  the Albanian KLA Islamist Nazi Narco-Terrorist Child Sex Slavery Mafia – gets the president of the US/NATO owned and controlled Hague ICTY Kangaroo Court to free the ex-Kosovo “Prime Minister” and KLA Islamist Nazi war criminal – Ramush Haradinaj – IN ADVANCE of his totally phony “surrender” and “trial” at the Hague ICTY:

“a deal would be struck to ensure that he did not serve prison time for the charges he faced.”  

Continue reading

THE SULTAN KNISH IS A PRO IMPERIALIST

By Felix Quigley

Sultan Knish …what sort of a name is that! It is obviously a fake name and unlike Israpundit, I do not like our writers on 4international to use anything other than their real names. All the same, this really made me laugh:

Sultan introducing his blog:

Named one of the Jewish Press’ Most Worthwhile Blogs, 2006, 2007 and 2008 Cited at Front Page Magazine and One Jerusalem and Little Green Footballs and American Thinker and Hot Air
Quoted by Daniel Pipes , Atlas Shrugs, Debbie Schlussel and Tim Blair, Judith Klinghoffer and Michelle Malkin
Referenced by Michael Savage , AM 770 CHQR – The World Tonight with Rob Breakenridge , 670 WCBM Sean and Frank and Jim Ball  

But I am a revolutionary socialist, Mr Knish, a Trotskyist, and I do not give two figs for all of that top brass in the Jewish world acknowledgement. They might just all be gullible, and wrong. So I will take what he writes about a known enemy of Israel and see how he fares. Quote from Knish first…what I make of his politics following… Continue reading

ISRAEL IS FORCED TO HAND OUT GAS MASKS

Israel Orders Bio/Chemical Warfare Masks

This is a report just out from Exodus Times of today, Thursday April 4, 2008. We are talking once more of gas in the context of the killing of Jews. The links with the Nazi Holocaust, with the founder of the Palestinian Arab movement by main Palestinian Arab and Holocaust Nazi organizer Hajj Amin el Husseini is obvious. In the eyes of these Arab Fascists, like Hamas, Fatah and Hezbullah, the Holocaust did not end. Meanwhile the main issue facing humanity, not just Jews, the threat of Iranian Fascist Mullahs, to bomb Israel with Nuclear, remains the main existentialist question above all others facing Israel. Continue reading