BUSH COULD EASILY HAVE CREATED AN ALLIANCE WITH SADDAM AGAINST IRAN AND THE JIHAD…BUT WENT THE OPPOSITE ROAD

The issue of the 2003 Bush War on Saddam is fundamental. It is key. I return to this issue all of the time.

 

The opposition to the 2003 Bush War from the “Left” was clearly

 

1. part of the Alliance of the “Left” with Islam

2. a negation of the Jihad

 

i can show easily that this Alliance of the “Left” with Mohammedanism stands in contradiction to the great socialist founders, and most specifically with positions of Leon Trotsky.

 

The “left” refuses to believe that there is a Jihad in the world by the forces of Mohammedanism. But that should have been the real reason for opposing the Bush War on Saddam. Let me explain.

 

Saddam was at every point prepared to enter into Alliance with Bush and US for one reason and one reason only. Saddam saw as the main danger to himself and to his state as being the Jihad. Thus the FBI/CIA interviews with Saddam post capture tell a lot (Wikipedia has report)

 

“…had resisted U.N. weapons inspections because he “was more concerned about Iran discovering Iraq’s weaknesses and vulnerabilities than the repercussions of the United States for his refusal to allow U.N. inspectors back into Iraq,” according to the reports.^[5] The former leader reportedly maintained that he did not collaborate with Al-Qaeda, as had been suggested by George W. Bush administration officials in support of its policy of regime change in Iraq.^[6] Hussein said he feared Al-Qaeda would have turned on him, and was quoted calling Osama bin Laden a “zealot.”^[3] 

 

The opposition of Saddam to the UN Inspections was also to show Iran that he was still strong. (Honour in Arab politics, loss of face…see Richard Landes on this) Saddam also had reason to fear Iran.

 

Thus there was a clear opportunity for the US and Britain to créate an Alliance with Saddam against Iran and against the Jihad in particular.

 

Bush did not take that road. There is obviously no question about that.

 

Was Gadhafi afraid that Bush would do the same to him? Yes (after Desert Storm who would not be!) but to pose it like that is to miss the other reality (that other reality!) which is far more important. These are secular Arab rulers who fear the Islamic Jihad. That was far more important in pushing Gadhafi into an Alliance with Bush and Blair agaisnt the Jihad.

 

The “Left” misreads, misunderstands, and now is an agent of Islam, and the “Left” opposition to the Bush War was leading all of those millions of youth and workers into a specific AND REACTIONARY direction. Under leaders like Chomsky and probably ALSO under the influence of state agents in their ranks the “Left” was becoming a problem for the working class itself…still is.

 

(see http://4international.me/2014/06/20/the-barbarism-brought-on-by-bush-glick-and-blair-overthrowing-saddam/)

 

 

 

 

THE BARBARISM BROUGHT ON BY BUSH, GLICK AND BLAIR OVERTHROWING SADDAM

Sayyid Qutb on trial in 1966 and executed by the secular Nasser

 

Sharon was wiser by far than the US influenced Caroline Glick and privately opposed Bush removing Saddam.

 

The “left” opposed the Bush/Glick/Blair war because they are degenerate “pacifism”…Also fuelled by anti-Americanism and pro Islam sentiments a la Karen Armstrong

 

The coming to power of Obama created an even newer and more dangerous situation. The middle class enraged is a most dangerous thing. The Middle Class in America elected Obama from its position of pacifism and from its phoney doctrines of anti-racism. These savages of the Middle Class thought it wonderful to elect a “Black” man. Thus the enraged Middle Class, the Media, the BDS crowd, Media Matters dot org, and so on decided to do away with political research. The history of Obama and CIA man Bill Ayers was ignored.

 

Obama got rid of all of these secular type rulers in the Arab world. This was a continuation of US and EU support for Izetbegovic and getting rid of the secularist Milosevic.

 

These leaders were downed one by one by Obama, including Mubarak, Ben Ali and Gadhafi.

 

Then followed Syria. The protests again were got underway. Obama insisted that Assad must go (see it…repeat of former Saddam Mubarak Gadhafi and Ben Ali)

 

Obama now had control of the US State Machine and in saying Assad must go Obama piled up an Armada opposite Syrian shores. But Assad had a political backing, that of minorities in Syria who feared the Jihad. For Christians and Kurds the Jihad meant death.

 

The same exists now in Iraq. First Obama withdraws the US Army. The road is thus cleared again, on top of murder of Saddam, for Jihad

 

Now Obama goes through some subterfuge. He sends a few hundred folk into Iraq. Just useless to stop ISIL. A joke!

 

He lays his conditions again, for the secular Assad and the secular Nuri Al Maliki (relatively speaking he also is secular) and Obama is really calling for total chaos in Iraq.

 

The Kurds are in danger. The Christians and others in total danger. The North will be a bloodbath as Kurds will fight to defend themselves but on their own??? The South Obama will insist will be handed to Iran. The vast majority of the country will descend into a tribal barbarism with brutal Sharia the norm.

 

JEWS ONCE WERE ABOUT A QUARTER OF BAGHDAD. NOT ONE REMAINS.

 

THE SAME FUTURE FOR CHRISTIANS. NO CHRISTIANS WILL REMAIN IN A POST OBAMA IRAQ.

 

 

To Martin Sherman and Richard Landes and my friends among the Jews…This is the disintegration of the world capitalist system