The key issue is the 2003 war against Saddam. Just yesterday the Israeli regime led by Netanyahu has launched attacks on Assad which has meant the Fascist Islamist opposition to Assad has gained.

(Israel struck nine Syrian targets in response to boy’s death, and as a boost for the rebel bid for Quneitra

DEBKAfile Special ReportJun 23, 2014, 3:36 AM (IDT)

Israel carried out nine strikes against Syrian military targets after midnight Monday, June 23, in retaliation for a Kornet rocket attack which killed an Israeli boy, and injured two others a few hours earlier. They were conducted by air and by Spike NLOS anti-tank missiles (Tamuz), against the Syrian 90th Brigade command center in Quneitra and three battalions

But back in the years before the pivotal 2003 war on Saddam Netanyahu was doing the very same thing, as we will see. This was also the position of Caroline Glick and Ted Belman of Israpundit. The actions of all of these people, all Jews, opened the door it Jihad int he world and in the Middle East that may well threaten as never before the Jewish people and Israel.)


We have seen in these 4international articles over the past few days that Israeli politicians around Sharon were totally opposed to the Bush War


(plus other articles in the past few days, including one from 2008 on


Thus in 2003 and the years leading up to the Bush War on Saddam this critical situation for Jews as brewing. The War in 2003 created the situation where THE LEADER OF ISRAEL Arik Sharon,  was telling Bush that he was opposed to the War. (Just read my article to see how explicit and prescient was Sharon)


But there were MANY OTHER JEWISH FORCES who were working apart from Sharon, meaning apart from the Israeli Government, and who were cutting right across Sharon.


They were:

Certainly Caroline Glick

Certainly Ted Belman of Israpundit. Belman had a whole line about US and BUSH recreating the world)

Certainly and above all Netanyahu


On this we now turn to Netanyahu and here we introduce an extract from Wikipedia for you to consider. Note that Buchanan is correct when he refers to Perle, Feith and Wurmsur (But there were many others) (I am opposed to Buchanan on a critical issue, Buchanan is silent on what we say about the opposition of Sharon to the war on Saddam and he is silent because he is essentially Antisemitic)


I have already mentioned Glick and Belman. But go into the records and there were more. Thus there is within Jews today a battle going on. There are those like Glick and Pamela Geller, plus many more who are really communist haters and who will do anything in that regard on behalf of US Imperialism


Now this weekend we have Netanyahu cheered on by Belman who throws Israel and the IDF against Assad, which is like a stab in the back against all those Christians and other minorities who support Assad against the Jihad.


I have just looked at the sites of Pamela Geller and at Israpundit and they are silent, which means they support Netanyahu in this ominous development. It is back to the 2003 Bush War on Saddam


Read also very carefully the remarks by Ian Buruma in the pivotal New York Times. Read this very carefully. See how Buruma has described the situation. The image created is that the US and Israel are together in this horrific development the War to remove Saddam


THEY ARE ALL TOGETHER except for one Little detail … we now know that the Israeli Government under Sharon was opposed, AIPAC was opposed, the spokespeople for Sharon in America were opposed and were telling all Jews coming to America to OPPOSE THIS WAR


But the Israeli Government was surrounded and was bushwhacked by the NeoCons which also were made up by Glick and Belman, and Geller carries this on in the present.


Can Israel win today with these people still around and doing the same thing in different forms? No it cannot win. It is being betrayed.


(Start extract from Wikipedia here)

In March 2003 Patrick J. Buchanan, referring to the 2003 invasion of Iraq and the report, wrote that “Their plan, which urged Israel to re-establish ‘the principle of preemption,’ has now been imposed by Perle, Feith, Wurmser & Co. on the United States.”[4]

Ian Buruma wrote in August 2003 in the New York Times that:[5]

Douglas Feith and Richard Perle advised Netanyahu, who was prime minister in 1996, to make “a clean break” from the Oslo accords with the Palestinians. They also argued that Israeli security would be served best by regime change in surrounding countries. Despite the current mess in Iraq, this is still a commonplace in Washington. In Paul Wolfowitz‘s words, “The road to peace in the Middle East goes through Baghdad.” It has indeed become an article of faith (literally in some cases) in Washington that American and Israeli interests are identical, but this was not always so, and “Jewish interests” are not the main reason for it now.

Buruma continues:[5]

What we see, then, is not a Jewish conspiracy, but a peculiar alliance of evangelical Christians, foreign-policy hard-liners, lobbyists for the Israeli government and neoconservatives, a number of whom happen to be Jewish. But the Jews among them—Perle, Wolfowitz, William Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard, et al.—are more likely to speak about freedom and democracy than about Halakha (Jewish law). What unites this alliance of convenience is a shared vision of American destiny and the conviction that American force and a tough Israeli line on the Arabs are the best ways to make the United States strong, Israel safe and the world a better place.



The issue of the 2003 Bush War on Saddam is fundamental. It is key. I return to this issue all of the time.


The opposition to the 2003 Bush War from the “Left” was clearly


1. part of the Alliance of the “Left” with Islam

2. a negation of the Jihad


i can show easily that this Alliance of the “Left” with Mohammedanism stands in contradiction to the great socialist founders, and most specifically with positions of Leon Trotsky.


The “left” refuses to believe that there is a Jihad in the world by the forces of Mohammedanism. But that should have been the real reason for opposing the Bush War on Saddam. Let me explain.


Saddam was at every point prepared to enter into Alliance with Bush and US for one reason and one reason only. Saddam saw as the main danger to himself and to his state as being the Jihad. Thus the FBI/CIA interviews with Saddam post capture tell a lot (Wikipedia has report)


“…had resisted U.N. weapons inspections because he “was more concerned about Iran discovering Iraq’s weaknesses and vulnerabilities than the repercussions of the United States for his refusal to allow U.N. inspectors back into Iraq,” according to the reports.[5] The former leader reportedly maintained that he did not collaborate with Al-Qaeda, as had been suggested by George W. Bush administration officials in support of its policy of regime change in Iraq.[6] Hussein said he feared Al-Qaeda would have turned on him, and was quoted calling Osama bin Laden a “zealot.”[3] 


The opposition of Saddam to the UN Inspections was also to show Iran that he was still strong. (Honour in Arab politics, loss of face…see Richard Landes on this) Saddam also had reason to fear Iran.


Thus there was a clear opportunity for the US and Britain to créate an Alliance with Saddam against Iran and against the Jihad in particular.


Bush did not take that road. There is obviously no question about that.


Was Gadhafi afraid that Bush would do the same to him? Yes (after Desert Storm who would not be!) but to pose it like that is to miss the other reality (that other reality!) which is far more important. These are secular Arab rulers who fear the Islamic Jihad. That was far more important in pushing Gadhafi into an Alliance with Bush and Blair agaisnt the Jihad.


The “Left” misreads, misunderstands, and now is an agent of Islam, and the “Left” opposition to the Bush War was leading all of those millions of youth and workers into a specific AND REACTIONARY direction. Under leaders like Chomsky and probably ALSO under the influence of state agents in their ranks the “Left” was becoming a problem for the working class itself…still is.









Sayyid Qutb on trial in 1966 and executed by the secular Nasser


Sharon was wiser by far than the US influenced Caroline Glick and privately opposed Bush removing Saddam.


The “left” opposed the Bush/Glick/Blair war because they are degenerate “pacifism”…Also fuelled by anti-Americanism and pro Islam sentiments a la Karen Armstrong


The coming to power of Obama created an even newer and more dangerous situation. The middle class enraged is a most dangerous thing. The Middle Class in America elected Obama from its position of pacifism and from its phoney doctrines of anti-racism. These savages of the Middle Class thought it wonderful to elect a “Black” man. Thus the enraged Middle Class, the Media, the BDS crowd, Media Matters dot org, and so on decided to do away with political research. The history of Obama and CIA man Bill Ayers was ignored.


Obama got rid of all of these secular type rulers in the Arab world. This was a continuation of US and EU support for Izetbegovic and getting rid of the secularist Milosevic.


These leaders were downed one by one by Obama, including Mubarak, Ben Ali and Gadhafi.


Then followed Syria. The protests again were got underway. Obama insisted that Assad must go (see it…repeat of former Saddam Mubarak Gadhafi and Ben Ali)


Obama now had control of the US State Machine and in saying Assad must go Obama piled up an Armada opposite Syrian shores. But Assad had a political backing, that of minorities in Syria who feared the Jihad. For Christians and Kurds the Jihad meant death.


The same exists now in Iraq. First Obama withdraws the US Army. The road is thus cleared again, on top of murder of Saddam, for Jihad


Now Obama goes through some subterfuge. He sends a few hundred folk into Iraq. Just useless to stop ISIL. A joke!


He lays his conditions again, for the secular Assad and the secular Nuri Al Maliki (relatively speaking he also is secular) and Obama is really calling for total chaos in Iraq.


The Kurds are in danger. The Christians and others in total danger. The North will be a bloodbath as Kurds will fight to defend themselves but on their own??? The South Obama will insist will be handed to Iran. The vast majority of the country will descend into a tribal barbarism with brutal Sharia the norm.







To Martin Sherman and Richard Landes and my friends among the Jews…This is the disintegration of the world capitalist system


WATCH THE LEFTIES Meeting of President Clinton, Binyamin Netanyahu, and Arafat in Wye Plantation, 15/10/1998.



It is clear that Netanyahu is now a key figure in whether or not the Israeli Jews and Israel will survive, or whether it will be sold down the river by a Jewish Israeli elite leadership, and Netanyahu is now that leadership.


That the secret service of the Israeli State closely linked to Netanyahu should raid the tent of the parents of the Israeli prisoner of Hamas, Shalit, seems to us on 4international as the most serious, alarming development


Now it so happens that we on 4international are in total opposition to what the Shalit parents want Israel to do, which is to let free thousands of Hamas/Fatah killers of Jews (in order to kill again, surely)


But to raid and search the tent where these poor parents of Shalit are campaigning for his life…that is an entirely different matter.


There is also the way in which Netanyahu used the dirtiest methods to shut up Feiglin. And this is the leader on whom the Israelis today depend.


In this material printed here one thing stands out: That Netanyahu was created in the United States, that he is a creature of the US intelligence community, Bush Snr., Shultz (George), those kinds of people.


There is the issue of Arens choosing of Netanyahu in an ambassadorial role to the United Nations


Literally from nowhere to leadership on the basis not of a programme, but a slick method of speaking in meetings, that sums it up.


Then there was the issue of GK (Gush Katif)…The patriotic Jews looked to Netanyahu to speak against Sharon, and they waited, and they waited, until essentially it was too late. The rotten deed could not be stopped.


Now there is this whole farce of the Obama lines speech, and Netanyahu emerging as an opponent of that Obama lines policy, but not really, because he is ALSO for the creation of a Palestine state, only perhaps on different lines


So his opposition to the anti-Semite Obama is not really fundamental, and is the opposition of say a Richard Perle.


So his opposition is really also the opposition of the Israeli elitist leaders in America, those same leaders who campaigned for Arafat to have his Jihadist State, and also those very leaders who supported Izetbegovic against the Serbs, and who supported the NATO/KLA takeover of Kosovo from the Serbs


Shine the light on Netanyahu!




By; Barry Chamish*


Two Fridays after Israel’s new Prime Minister was elected, the

newspapers were filled with bios of the new leader. The most indepth

research was undertaken by Orly Azula-Katz, Anat Meidan and Rami Tal of

Yediot Ahronot who produced a balanced portrait and Biranit Goren of

Kol Ha’ir whose story was a snow job.


Nonetheless, both reports agreed in most details, if not

interpretations. These two reports, combined with other public

knowledge create a most disturbing and mysterious caricature of

Israel’s leader for students of secret diplomacy.


The Conventional Story


The prevailing myth about Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is that he

grew up in a highly politicized, right wing household. Responsibility

for the presumption lies with his father Bar Tzion, a dedicated

revisionist who was a pallbearer at the funeral of Zeev Jabotinsky.


The facts are different. Netanyahu recalls,” My father did not want me

to enter politics. We were very non-political.” The founding families

of Zionism’s revisionist wing which produced two generations of leaders

like Menachem and Benny Begin and Yaacov and Dan Meridor, barely knew

of the Netanyahus.


What Binyamin inherited from his father was an obsession with learning.

His grades in junior high were all above average but he excelled in

only one subject: music.


When Binyamin moved to America at age fourteen after his father

accepted a teaching post in Philadelphia, his hero became JFK.

Netanyahu felt very alienated being away from Israel and took waitering

jobs to earn the money to spend his summers back home. There his

greatest pleasure was working on left-wing kibbutzim with his pals from

Jerusalem. They recall that he would always try to outwork them, even

when he had an injured knee.


Returning to high school in Philadelphia, Netanyahu shared close

friendship with only those students as imbued with love for Israel as

he was. He was a straight A student who graduated fourth in his class

at Cheltenham High School, one of the most academically competitive

schools in America. But he didn’t attend his graduation ceremony. War

broke out on June 5, 1967, and Netanyahu flew to Israel to volunteer

for the army.


A high school buddy, Ari Bintener recalls,”No one was surprised. It was

obvious his place was in Israel. I was pleased that he found a way to

help his country.”


Bob Trimble, Netanyahu’s soccer coach remembers,”Bibi was the best

player on the team, except for his brother Yoni who could have played

professionally if he had wanted to. The only problem with Ben was that

his political views were so far to the left of the other players.”


As a soldier, Binyamin rose to the rank of captain in the most secret

combat unit of all, the fighting arm of military intelligence. He took

part in a good number of legendary operations and was wounded while

fighting highjackers holding a Sabena passenger plane. On the Suez, he

almost drowned trying to swim with his heavy automatic rifle under

Egyptian fire. He became known as “the lousy swimmer from Jerusalem.”


Soldiers recall him as a cool but “square” officer who lost his temper

only once. That was when he found his men had been taking “souvenirs”

from operations in Lebanon. He put a quick end to what he viewed as



After five years of soldiering Netanyahu returned to America to study

architecture at either Harvard or MIT. He chose the latter because it

permitted him to begin an MA course load, as his academic advisor Prof

Leon Garviser remembers. “I told him that no one could handle the load

but he insisted that he had to make up for time lost while serving his

country. I agreed to add one extra course in the first semester and

when he passed all his courses I added another one. In the end he

finished his MA in two and a half years. Don’t ask me how. No one did

it before him or since.”


Once again, Netanyahu interrupted his studies only once. In October of

1973, war broke out in Israel and he flew back to fight in the Sinai.

When he returned, he became a student activist on behalf of Israel, a

fact that was noted by the Israeli consul of Boston, Collette Avital.

In one of the many ironies in his life, it was Avital, the dovish

consul of New York during the Rabin/Peres administration who arranged

Netanyahu’s first television appearance, a debate with PLO activist

Prof Edward Said.


The loss of his brother Yoni during the Entebbe raid put a stop to

Binyamin’s plans to become an architect. Instead he settled for an MA

in business administration and took a post at the Boston Consulting

Group. His boss was Ira Magaziner, the man who later was the

intellectual force behind the Clinton administration’s failed health

reform package.


As Moshe Arens notes, “Bibi is only the second prime minister who ever

had a real job outside the army or politics. Shamir was the first. He

once worked as an accountant in a glue factory.”


While working at Boston Consulting, Binyamin received his first

diplomatic assignment: he was sent to Sweden to advise the government

on efficient administration of public companies.


Already earning $100,000 and with a splendid career before him,

Netanyahu decided to give it all up and return to Israel to act as the

marketing manager of a furniture concern. As his colleague Barbara

Maclogan notes,”Anyone who claims Bibi planned to live in America

doesn’t know what he’s talking about. He gave up the opportunity of his

life in Boston to earn a quarter of his salary in Israel.”


In 1979, Netanyahu organized an anti-terrorism conference in Jerusalem,

dedicated to his fallen brother. Somehow, he managed to attract the

likes of George Bush, George Shultz, and Richard Perle (President’s

Reagan’s chief arms negotiator) to the meeting and was thrust briefly

onto the world stage. But when the conference ended, it was back to

work at the furniture factory.


That all changed in 1982, when Israel’s Washington Ambassador Moshe

Arens invited Netanyahu to be his deputy. This unprecedented career

rise has been a subject of much speculation. Many people have noted

that Bar Tzion Netanyahu was one of the few guests invited to Arens’

wedding and he was repaying an old friend. But Arens has a different

explanation. “People got a good laugh when they heard I phoned a

furniture factory to find a deputy. What sold me on Bibi was his

organization of the anti-terror conference and the strong impression he

made on American leaders who participated.”


In 1984, after two visibly successful years as Arens’ deputy, Bibi was

named Israel’s ambassador to the UN. In another of those ironies that

follow him, he was appointed to the post by Shimon Peres against the

objections of Yitzhak Shamir. Once again, it was a leader of the Labour

Party who promoted his early career.


This was the true turning point in his quest to become prime minister.

Netanyahu’s good looks, fluent English and controversial opinions made

him a media star. He became a frequent presence on Ted Koppel’s

Nightline and Larry King Live. As King observes,”Whenever he appeared,

the phones wouldn’t stop ringing. He especially made an impression on

women viewers. As a guest I’d rate him 8. If he had a sense of humor to

go with everything else, he’d have been a 10.”


During this period, Netanyahu wrote his book, Terror-How The West Can

Win. The book made a tremendous impression on the Reagan

administration. In fact, whenever George Bush visited New York, and

that was often, he would call on Netanyahu.


By 1988, Netanyahu had made powerful allies in the American media. He

received strong support from Charles Krauthammer of the Washington

Post, Abe Rosenthal of the New York Times, and Ellie Weymouth, daughter

of Katherine Graham, the publisher of Newsweek. When he returned to

Israel, he was too powerful a figure to be ignored and was appointed,

first Deputy Foreign Minister and later the Prime Minister’s spokesman.

In this capacity, CNN made Netanyahu an international media star during

the Persian Gulf War.


Netanyahu was ready to challenge the Old Guard of the Likud. The

combination of youth, determination and powerful allies abroad led to a

resounding victory in the Likud primaries of 1993 and in the general

elections of 1996.



Sent by Barry Chamish – Israeli journalist.

Phone/Fax : (972)-2-9914936

E-Mail    :




The Konformist: The Chamish Files – Bibi Part Two

Subject: The Konformist: The Chamish Files – Bibi Part Two


Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 07:04:20 -0500 (EST)


Subj: ESSAY: [2/2] Natanyahu

Date: 97-01-31 12:51:08 EST

From: (Chamish Barry)

From: Chamish Barry


The Secret Life Of Binyamin Netanyahu


Even within the conventional story, it is clear that Netanyahu was

groomed for leadership by the Council On Foreign Relations (CFR) in New

York. In 1979, twenty-seven year old Netanyahu called a conference on

terrorism and the ruling elite of the CFR, Bush, Shultz and Perle

answered to his summons. One word will suffice: why?


Yoni Netanyahu was undoubtedly a martyr but far from the only one in

Israel. He was not such a powerful symbol that the CFR would send a

delegation of its biggest guns, including CIA director Bush to his

unknown brother’s get-together.


Netanyahu’s decision to quit his lucrative Boston job is almost

inexplcable. Netanyahu sought a highpaying job at a prestigious

consulting firm yet not two months later, he gave it up to fly back to

Israel and sell sofas. He was barely settled in back home when he

decided to organize an anti-terrorism conference and invite the most

powerful people in Washington to attend.


It is possible that Netanyahu was told to quit his job, return to

Israel and arrange the conference. Perhaps there is a connection to the

fact that a year later Shultz later made fighting terrorism a first

priority of the Reagan administration and that Vice-President Bush was

appointed to head a front for illegal covert activities called The

Anti-Terror Task Force.


Arens’ offer of a deputy ambassadorship to salesman Netanyahu

made no political sense. Israeli diplomatic aides and deputies

typically rise slowly through the Foreign Ministry bureaucracy. They

are not thrust into the second highest position at the most vital

embassy in the world. It is far from impossible that Arens was

directed to bring in Netanyahu by the very people in the Reagan

administration who attended his conference three years earlier.


Once in New York in 1984, CFR-affiliated media such as CNN, the New

York Times, Washington Post, Newsweek and CFR members Koppel and King

turned Netanyahu into a major political figure; so much so that George

Shultz became a close friend. We again ask the succinct question: why?

What did Shultz, twenty years Netanyahu’s senior, find so amusing about

the Israeli UN Ambassador that he had to pay him a courtesy call every

time he flew to New York? In 1985, Shultz chaired another Netanyahu-

organized conference on terrorism, this time in Washington. The

resulting publicity and prestige was a significant factor in

Netanyahu’s fast-rising political career. Clearly, the secretary-of-

state had a major stake in Netanyahu’s future. Which means, so did

George Bush.


All that can be concluded from the conventional story. What then do we

make of Bibi’s secret life?


In 1987, Netanyahu applied for credit using his American social

security number 020364537. With that number, he or someone else made

the application under a phony name, John Sullivan, living at a false

address in Northern California.


Netanyahu used Sullivan’s name to borrow money during 1987-88. John

Sullivan does not exist, nor does Netanyahu’s credit file. Israeli and

American reporters who tried to dig into Netanyahu’s past using his

social security number discovered two other phony names used to apply

for credit in 1987-88 but were perplexed to find that his credit

records were completely removed. Only someone very high up in the

American government could have authorized the erasing of the file.


We return to the all-purpose question: why? Again, no one who knows is

talking. What is nearly certain is that while Netanyahu was the UN

Ambassador, he was either defrauding a credit company or on an

assignment involving money that required three identity changes.


Then there is Netanyahu’s close relationship with Congressman Ben

Gillman, head of the House Committee On International Relations. The

problem here is that Gillman was also a close associate of Shabtai

Kalmonovitch and shared business deals with him in Africa. Kalmonovitch

was, not long after, imprisoned in Israel as a KGB spy. This is not to

imply that Netanyahu was involved in spying, only that his closest ally

in Congress has mighty strange intelligence ties to Israel.


And what to make of the mystery of Netanyahu’s housing?. Before he was

even the leader of the Likud, two foreign businessmen, Jack Mandel of

Australia and Sandy Eisenstadt of the US each paid about $750,000 to

buy Netanyahu luxury apartments in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Again, no

one has a clue why. There is speculation that part of the reason may be

Eisenstadt’s stake in an Israeli oil exploration company, a shady and

hidden business, but no concrete connection has been discovered by the

Israeli media.


Netanyahu’s penchant for secrecy is not subtle. It is well-known among

the Israeli media that he had conducted a number of secret meetings

with the Jordanian royal family in London and Amman before he became

prime minister. Even the conventional Jerusalem Post reported in mid-

June that six secret meetings were held in the past two years. But when

Inside Israel just before the elections asked Netanyahu to comment on

the meetings, he denied they had ever taken place.


Perhaps the most secret and worrying ties concern what is supposedly a

high-tech services company. Yediot Ahronot relates how Netanyahu wooed

a local Likud leader. “He was invited by Netanyahu to a meeting in his

office at Systematics in Ramat Gan. The head of the company, Oded

Levental is a candidate for a financial post in the new government.”


Systematics is at the core of serious research by American alternative

publications, including the usually reliable Media Bypass. In short,

the allegations are that the National Security Agency had handed

Systematics stolen software called Promis that opened a trap door to

the world’s secret banking transactions. About 250 Americans, mostly

politicians, had their illegal foreign accounts emptied of over $3.5

billion in the operation. It is claimed that Colin Powell dropped out

of the presidential race after his account electronically vanished.

Leading figures in the operation included George Bush, Caspar

Weinberger and two Arkansas attorneys, Vince Foster Jr. and Hillary

Rodham Clinton on behalf of Clinton financier Jackson Stephens. The

research invariably concludes that Foster was murdered because he knew

too much about the scam.


A leading investigative writer, Sherman Skolnick, writes:


“Some contend Systematics is an NSA proprietary and spies on banks

overseas. Can Systematics rightfully deny spying actually done by

buffers or cut-outs between Systematics and NSA? Systematics, through a

spokesperson, vigorously denies Foster assisted it in any spying on

foreign banks but remains apparently silent on whether Hillary Rodham

Clinton assisted Systematics in some nefarious activities.”


Is it fair to ask why Systematics provided Netanyahu office space and

if this was the sum total of its involvement with him?


Since taking office, Netanyahu has fueled fears of international

control by his actions within Israel’s tiny anti-NWO community. They

were most intrigued by his refusal to give Ariel Sharon a sensitive

cabinet post. One possible reason is fear of Sharon’s own intelligence

arm in the US. Then for those people who fervently hoped that he would

rid himself of any connections to the Arye Deri scandal, with all its

implications of money laundering and perhaps murder, Netanyahu

appointed as his Justice Minister, Yaacov Neeman, a lawyer who is

currently being investigated for intimidating a key witness against

Deri in a London trial.


But the topper was Netanyahu’s decision to allow Yaacov Frenkel to run

the country’s economy single-handedly. Frenkel worked for the World

Bank between 1971-1990. After nineteen years away from “home” Frenkel

was unexplainedly appointed head of the Bank of Israel.


His policies mirrored the world-wide debt program of his previous

employer documented by numerous researchers. The plan involves raising

interest rates beyond what the public or industry can afford, and

forcing the government to borrow lots of money from American banks to

keep the populace pacified. When the debts have to be repaid from an

empty treasury, the International Monetary Fund bails out the country

with schemes guaranteed to impoverish the people.


Frenkel was a proponent of Israel borrowing $10 billion in loans

guaranteed by the American government and he kept his interest rates as

high as he could in the face of opposition from then-Finance Minister

Avraham Shohat who suspected Frenkel, “was playing politics with the

Bank of Israel.”


Binyamin Netanyahu, the man who Inside Israel hoped would save Israel

from the NWO puppet regime of Peres, appointed Yaacov Frenkel to be his

Minister of Finance. The only thing that prevented the disaster was

party opposition to an appointee who had never publicly supported the



Dan Meridor got the post instead. But as the Maariv headline read:

“Meridor Will Act, Frenkel Will Lead.” On his first day in office

Meridor announced that his policy would be to lower the standard of

living in Israel. Not a week later, Frenkel raised the interest rates

by a whopping 1.5% with Meridor’s “approval.”


Something is going on behind the scenes at the CFR. While Secretary of

State Warren Christopher must appear to be opposing Likud government

policies to keep the Arabs in line, the former CFR director is playing

some kind of double game with Netanyahu.


King Hussein made his accommodation with Netanyahu well before the

elections and refused to support Peres during the campaign. Netanyahu’s

victory clearly delighted him and on the surface, why not? The last

thing he would want is a PLO state on his border with control of the

Moslem holy sites. In time, it will become clearer what Netanyahu

promised the King during the secret London meetings. Included, most

assuredly, will be Jordanian hegemony over the Temple Mount.


There has been a transformation in Israel but the CFR is still running

the latest prime minister. And that is a good reason for intense fear

about Israel’s future.



Barry Chamish is the editor of Inside Israel, an investigative report

on Israeli affairs. For a free sample copy and subscription

information, write:



POB 579

Swindon, Wiltshire


Fax: 44-793-790722



Sent by Barry Chamish – Israeli journalist.

Phone/Fax : (972)-2-9914936

E-Mail    :


By Felix Quigley

It is of great importance that revolutionary socialists who stand in the tradition of Marx, Lenin and Trotsky take a position of total support for the families of the young Jeweish students who were murdered by an Arab Palestinian Islamofascist yesterday. Continue reading