Winston Churchill June 1941 on Nazi invasión of Russia
I am not saying here that Iran today is Germany 1933. But yesterday we said that if Iran had the nuclear bomb then it would use it against the millions of Jews in Israel.
I base this thought which is a thought of scientific truth because when you study Antisemitism there is no limits to it. When the Nazis were clearly defeated in 1944/45, and THEY KNEW they were defeated, the hatred of Antisemitism carried them on and they INTENSIFIED the Holocaust of the Jews. It was because of this TRUTH that Anne Frank and her sister lost their lives at the end.
So think on this…If the Antisemitism of Iran has the Nuclear Bomb then it will use it against Jews.
Bush held Israel back from destroying the Iranian Bomb. Obama carried this forward but in a more obvious way.
The agreement that Obama talked about, or the possibility of an agreement, was always a lie and Obama knew that. The reasons behind his and Bush’s thinking do not matter. What matters is the results.
These are the latest moves by Iran in these negotiations:
“Iran Throws Monkey Wrench Into Nuclear Deal,” Reza Kalilli, Yahoo, May 18, 2014
Iran has thrown up new roadblocks to reaching a deal with the P5+1 world powers over its illicit nuclear program.
* Three days of negotiations in the fourth round of Geneva discussions ended Friday in arguments and confrontations when the Iranian team presented their country’s new “red lines,” diminishing any hope by the Obama administration to claim victory in its approach to Iran’s nuclear ambitions, according to reports from Iran. Hossein Shariatmadari, a former torturer and now managing editor of the conservative newspaper Keyhan, the mouthpiece of the country’s supreme leader, in an Op-Ed published Saturday revealed details of the Geneva negotiations and congratulated the Iranian delegation for its steadfast demand that the country has a right to pursue nuclear development.
* The Obama administration hoped (DID HE REALLY?) that with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and Foreign Minister Javad Zarif showing an eagerness to solve the nuclear issue and address the West’s concerns, there would be a possibility for a negotiated solution. An interim agreement penned last November in Geneva was touted as a “historic nuclear deal.” Under that agreement, Iran — in return for billions of dollars in sanctions relief — limited its enrichment activity to the 5 percent level with a current stockpile of over 10 tons (enough for six nuclear bombs), converted much of its 20 percent enriched stock to harmless oxide and agreed to allow more intrusive inspections of its nuclear plants by the International Atomic Energy Agency, whose inspections were limited to only agreed-on facilities. The final draft of the agreement to address all of Iran’s nuclear facilities and activities, along with its missile program, was planned to be finalized this July. “The Obama administration and its allies were drunken happy after the initial agreement,” said Shariatmadari, who had previously criticized the Iranian negotiating officials for being soft with their Western counterparts. “With this delusion, that with the continuation of negotiations they could wrap up the issue, they had come prepared to Geneva with their demeaning requests of security ‘breakout’ or preventive measures of (possible military dimensions). … To present these conditions as their winning cards on the negotiating table, they could not imagine in their wildest dreams that this time the Iranian negotiators on the other side of the table … were aware of the opponents’ tricks.” The red lines that the Iranian delegation presented, as stated by Shariatmadari, are: • The expansion of Iranian nuclear research and development. • The acceptance of Iran’s need for enrichment on a level that feeds the need of the country (the country has over 19,000 centrifuges, far more than is needed for peaceful nuclear purposes, and would like to expand). • The preservation of the Arak heavy-water plant (the plant once operational could produce plutonium and serve the ruling clerics with a second path to nuclear weapons). • No interference or limitation to the country’s military and defensive measures (the Islamic regime is under U.N. sanctions for developing ballistic missiles and it currently holds the largest missile stockpile in the Middle East with ranges capable of reaching as far as Europe). • The removal of all sanctions at once as opposed to step-by-step relief (the U.N. resolutions and sanctions in place are the results of efforts by several U.S. administrations and over a decade of negotiations). “These (red) lines, which the enemy had never expected to see, at first caused their disbelief and then their anger to the level of shouts and arguments,” Shariatmadari wrote. “The opponents thought that the conditions set by the Iranian delegates were meant to increase (Iran’s) negotiating power, but when faced with their absolute resolve … they realized that their dreams were swept away and that the Geneva 4meeting had failed.” According to a source within the regime’s intelligence community, the leadership will not give up its nuclear ambitions, and the Revolutionary Guards see themselves as the dominating power in the Middle East and beyond. They believe that the Obama administration will not engage militarily and that the regime needs to weather the sanctions regime, which has already cracked due to the initial Geneva agreement. – See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2014/05/obama-outmaneuvered-iran-deal.html/#sthash.wNcoInJy.dpuf
CONCLUSION BY 4INTERNATIONAL
there comes a time when defence means action.
Israel runs out of time on this score. The situation is this. If I have to concrete over my front garden because i cannot stand the weeds. I use one cement mixer and it takes me a week. Or I use 100 cement mixers and it takes me 20 minutes. It all now depends on the number of accelerators that Iran has available to change 5 per cent to 10, then to 20, then to 40, then to 80 and THEY ARE THERE.
Thus a lie was sold to the whole world on this, and especially to Jews, but such a war by Iran will effect the whole world.
One thing that Marx and Lenin/león Trotsky did not do…they did not lie. They were above all revealers of underlying truths and they were researchers. You may not like marxism but grant them that.
However the anti-Marxist leftists of today DO NOT STAND IN THAT TRADITION. That is the problem of leadership that we keep on referring to on 4international
WE WILL STAND WITH THE ISRAELIS…ALWAYS
Radio broadcast on the German invasion of Russia (June 1941).
4international 