THE WHOLE OF THE SREBRENICA MASSACRE HOAX WAS BASED ON THE “EVIDENCE” OF A SUPERGRASS

The BBC World Service this morning had Ed Vulliamy on the panel to discuss world affairs but he was really there because of the arrest of Ratco Mladic, and to regurgitate his lies about the conflict.

 

It will come as no surprise that Vulliamy did not deal with the main event since his former reporting.

 

That event was the publication of Civikov’s book.

 

As 4international stated in yesterday’s article the Civikov book focuses in on one key element, that is that the ONLY evidence which showed that there was a “massacre” in Srebrenica is the “evidence” of a supergrass called Drazen Erdymovic

 

A supergrass is a man or woman who has been bought and paid for by the police. The prosecutors in The Hague Kangaroo Court who bought and paid for Erdymovic hence feed the evidence in and one end and this evidence simply comes out the other.

 

In our article on 4international yesterday this in the context of The Hague Kangaroo Court meant:

 

1. Since Erdymovic did not murder all of those 1200 people on that farm on his own, but had 7 accomplices, plus two higher up in command, then the big question is why all of those murderers have been living such unmolested lives then and now. His accomplices have never been even questioned. This amazed them and it even amazed Erdymovic!
2. And this is a pattern of course with supergrass trials. The same happened in the trials in Northern Ireland in which the star was Christopher Black. The police only need the one supergrass. Any other intrusion into his evidence would really not only be superfluous to the narrative they are producing, but downright dangerous, for obvious reasons. It is like the mechanics of winding up a puppet, imagine having to repeat that performance with 7 puppets. Can’t be done.

The whole of the Srebrenica narrative stinks to high heaven.

 

That is precisely why the champion sneerer of the western world, Ed Vulliamy, was on the BBC panel this morning. Vulliamy spent the whole programme sneering at the Serbs and asserting that the Serbs who defend Mladic have not “changed”.

 

So what does Ed Vulliamy do with the startling research by Civikov. Easy answer. He hides it.

 

Under no condition can that book of Civikov be referenced in any discussion anywhere.

 

The same tone yesterday was set by the political liars on Harry’s Place website, a website based in London and frequented by many of these paid journalistic hacks like Vulliamy. It headlined its article with “Got the bastard!” The great British legal system of habeas Corpus, innocent until proven guilty, examine all of the evidence carefully, fairly and dispassionately…right out the window.

 

Something else ios going on beyond Bosnia and beyond Srebrenica. What is highlighted by this peculiar behaviour as in Harry’s Place is the political and moral degeneration of a whole layer in society. That is actually the same social strata that followed Hitler in Germany

 

This social layer is out of the English middle class, is hostile to the main forces of the working class on the one hand, and American’s fight to defend the First Amendment on the other.

This is why Obama is their leader and why they are so hateful towards George W. Bush, not because Bush was in an alliance with Islam, which for most of his time in office he was, but because they perceived him as fighting Islam.

 

Of course Ratko Mladic is right on all counts. As his son and lawyer say he needs an independent medical examination, to assess the effects of strokes which he has had.

 

Naturally Ed Vulliamy sneered at this!

 

He is also right as his lawyer says to maintain that he harmed nobody in malice, that all he is guilty of is to defend his own Christian Serbs and other minorities, including a Muslim minority which was in opposition to Izetbegovic and the Jihad. Mladic was engaged in a war which was not of his making or choosing but was the result of the alliance of US and EU Imperialism’s alliance with the Muslim Jihad

 

Mladic is also right to assert through his lawyer that he has no chance of a fair trial in The Hague. It is after all The Hague Kangaroo Court.

 

THE ONLY CRIME OF MLADIC WAS THAT HE FOUGHT AGAINST JIHAD ON BEHALF OF THE CHRISTIAN SERB PEOPLE

Srebrenica is really at the centre of our political life today. Let me explain.

 

IT WAS ALL A GIANT LIE

The world was taught that the wars in Yugoslavia were unequal. On one side was the Serb Fascist Expansionist aggressor. On the other side were the victims of this aggressor.

 

When it came to the war in Bosnia Herzegovina this was even more pronounced in the Media as it implanted just this Christian aggressor/Muslim victimhood into the consciousness of the general public.

 

So there is an immediate connection right there to the present.

 

The main factors in this link are Obama, Cameron and Sarkozy and their Media machines.

 

They spin the story that:

Mubarak was the cruel dictator amassing huge fortunes and savaging his people.

 

Then with Mubarak forced to resign the attention switched to Muammar Gadhafi and here the cry was raised everywhere that Gadhafi was attacking “his own people” or was “attacking civilians”. It seems that most people will swallow anything they hear on the Media.

 

But this was what was happening in Yugoslavia, and it is very wrong to create a disconnect between the two.

 

What was hidden was that the leadership of the Bosnian Muslims around Izetbegovic was Jihadist Muslim in their political orientation.

 

Just as the main and strongly organized force in the “Arab Spring” is also Jihadist Islam (The Muslim Brotherhood)

 

Something else happened in Bosnia. The Muslims led by Izetbegovic employed the American public relations firm Ruder Finn, and in the United States this Ruder Finn broadcast repeatedly that the Serbs were Nazis and that they were running concentration camps, just like the Nazis did in the Holocaust.

 

This was the precise and admitted job of Ruder Finn, to paint the Serbs and their leaders as Nazis.

 

It was all a lie. There were no concentration camps. It was a civil war and a war of defence by the Christian Serbs against the Izetbegovic Jihad on Christians.

 

IZETBEGOVIC ADMITTED TO KOUCHNER HE WAS A LIAR

Before he died Izetbegovic admitted to the French diplomat Kouchner that the concentration camp propaganda was just that, a propagandist lie

 

The Srebrenica Massacre emerged out of that, was and is the biggest hoax of all.

 

In fact this Srebrenica Massacre was being talked about 2 years before it happened, in 1993, when Izetbegovic emerged out of a meeting with Bill Clinton, to tell his Islamist colleagues from Srebrenica that Clinton wanted a “massacre” staged, in order that the US could intervene with bombing against the Serbs and Serbia.

 

About Srebrenica we on 4international said and say:

 

There is not one item of proof that the Serbs murdered a single Muslim on retaking Srebrenica

 

A CAREFULLY LAID TRAP

It is true though that…The Serbs walked into a carefully laid trap which involved Izetbegovic and the Jihadist leadership removing the main Muslim Squadrons, and thus the surprised Serbs walked straight in without any fight

It was a trap.

 

From there the lies started and continue today and this is the only significance to the arrest by the “Serbs” of this aged and mentally ill former general Ratko Mladic

 

We will turn the tables on the ruling class and on the Ruder Finn pro Jihad liars here.

 

The real tragedy in the situation is that this proud Army Serb leader has been hounded in the latter part of his life and his only and real crime was that he fought against Jihad on behalf of the Serb Christian people.

LESSONS FOR JEWS

The way that this giant hoax of The Srebrenica massacre is of supreme importance for us all to recognize, but especially for Israel and the Jews.

 

The natural allies of the Jews ARE the Serbs because the Serbs and the Jews suffered together in the Nazi Holocaust, and both Serbs and Jews are linked together in recognition of the previous and precedent setting Armenian Massacre by the Turkish government on defenceless Christians. But Jews, especially American Jews, have got to learn the main lesson which is that the power of American Imperialist ideology is great, and that American Jews and their organizations were largely taken in by the ruder Finn propaganda, and this problem is carried into the present, especially over the destruction of Mubarak and Gadhafi, again being replaced by the equivalent of Izetbegovic, The Muslim Brotherhood. It is also to recognize this strategic alliance between capitalist imperialist power and the forces of Islam, essentially the present day Jihad, which we call the Empire Sharia Alliance. It is real.

ERDYMOVIC, WHO WAS ANOTHER CHRISTOPHER BLACK, HOLDS THE SECRET WHICH PROVES THE “SREBRENICA MASSACRE” WAS A GIANT HOAX!

The case of the ICTY Court in the Hague and how it created the giant hoax of “The Srebrenica Massacre”, on the morning after the arrest of Ratko Mladic

 

The whole existence of the ICTY Court (also known as the Hague Kangaroo Court) was based on the “evidence” of one person, who was the equivalent but much worse of Christopher Black of Derry, of supergrass infamy. His name was Drazen Erdymovic.

 

I separate with Harman. I have seen no evidence of any such killing and my big question to Harman is why believe anything that a paid liar like Erdymovic says anyways.

 

My point to Herman is that the police in such cases recruit vulnerable people, who in turn do a deal, and after that they are the property not of the truth but of the police. It is really an old story.

 

But Herman summarises the central issue in Civikov’s book well in these paragraphs below.

 

THE KEY ISSUE IS

Erdymovic in his own story and paid evidence to The Kangaroo Court did not act alone, but in his own words with 7 others.

 

Not only were these 7 others not prosecuted in “such a ghastly crime” as Srebrenica but the ICTY took great care NOT to prosecute them

 

And that is the central clue which if honest people follow it up leads to the reality that the “Srebrenica Massacre” is a giant hoax.

(The central witness in the case which had at its centre the Srebrenica Massacre had 7 associates, with two others further up in the chain of command. They have been and are ignored. Is that not fishy!)

 

But when it comes to Serbs and Jews there are not many honest people around and liars abound.

 

(Start here)

Global Research, January 10, 2011

A review of Germinal Chivikov’s book Srebrenica: The Star Witness (orig. Srebrenica: Der Kronzeuge, 2009, transl. by John Laughland) – “a devastating indictment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY).”

One of the most remarkable and revealing features of the Erdemovic case is that although he named seven individuals who did the killing with him, and two superiors in the chain of command who ordered or failed to stop the crime, not one of these was ever brought into an ICTY court either as an accused killer or to confirm any of Erdemovic’s claims. These co-killers have lived quietly, within easy reach of ICTY jurisdiction, but untroubled by that institution and any demands seemingly imposed by a rule of law. The commander of his unit, Milorad Pelemis, who Erdemovic claimed had given the order to kill, made it clear in an interview published in a Belgrade newspaper in November 2005, that the Hague investigators have never questioned him. He had never gone into hiding, but has lived undisturbed with his wife and children in Belgrade. Nor have ICTY investigators bothered with Brano Gojkovic, a private in the killer team who Erdemovic claimed was somehow in immediate command of the unit (a point never explained by him or prosecutors or judges). Civikov points out that only once did the judges in any of the five trials in which the star witness testified ask the prosecutors whether they were investigating these other killers. The prosecutors assured the judges in 1996 that the others were being investigated, but 14 years later the Office of the Prosecutor had not questioned one of them. And from 1996 onward the judges never came back to the subject.

As these seven were killers of many hundreds in Erdemovic’s version, and the prosecutors and judges took Erdemovic’s version as true, why were these killers left untouched? One thing immediately clear is that the ICTY was not in the business of serving impartial justice even to the point of arresting and trying wholesale killers of Bosnian Muslims in a case the ICTY itself called “genocide.” But ignoring the co-perpetrators in this case strongly suggests that the prosecutors and judges were engaged in a political project—protecting a witness who would say what the ICTY wanted said, and refusing to allow any contesting evidence or cross-examination that would discredit the star witness. Civikov points out that the only time Erdemovic was subject to serious cross-examination was when he was questioned by Milosevic himself during the marathon Milosevic trial. And Civikov shows well that the ICTY presiding judge in that case, Richard May, went to great pains to stop Milosevic whenever his questions penetrated too deeply into the area of Erdemovic’s connections or credibility.

In April 2004, a Bosnian Croat, Marko Boskic, was arrested in Peabody, Massachusetts, for having caused a hit-and-run car crash while drunk. It was soon discovered that Boskic was one of the members of Erdemovic’s killer team at Branjevo Farm But journalists at the ICTY soon discovered that the Tribunal did not intend to ask for the extradition of this accused and confessed murderer. A spokesman for the Office of the Prosecutor stated on August 2004 that the prosecutor was not applying for the extradition of Boskic because it was obligated to concentrate on “the big fish.” So killing hundreds, and being part of a “joint criminal enterprise” murdering 1,200, does not yield big enough fish for the ICTY. In fact, this is a major lie as dozens of cases have been brought against Serbs for small-scale killings or even just beatings, and the ICTY has thrived on little fish for many years. In fact, the first case ever brought by the ICTY was against one Dusko Tadic in 1996, who was charged with a dozen killings, all dismissed for lack of evidence, leaving him guilty of no killings whatsoever, but only of persecution and beatings, for which he was given a 20 year sentence. A number of other Serbs were given prison sentences, not for killing people, but for beatings or passivity in not exercising authority to constrain underlings (e.g., Dragolic Prcac, 5 years; Milojica Kos, 6 years, Mlado Radic, 20 years, among others). The dossier of ICTY prosecution of little (Serb) fish is large.

Thus, the Boskic case does not fall into any little-fish-disinterest category. Rather, it is perfectly consistent with the failure to bring to court Pelermis or any of the seven known co-perpetrators of the massacre. Civikov’s very plausible hypothesis is that this is another manifestation of star witness protection—the ICTY does not want his convenient testimony to be challenged. Little fish like Boskic might gum up a political project. Civikov contrasts the extremely alert and aggressive actions of the ICTY and U.S. authorities in getting Erdemovic transferred to the Hague in March 1996 with this remarkable reluctance to even question Erdemovic’s fellow killers. He was seen quickly as a man who might make proper connections to enemy targets, so no holds were barred then, or later..

http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=22727