THE UNITED STATES CAPITALISM WILL WAR ON CHINA – CRISIS DRIVES INTO MORE CRISIS

Speaking in Hawaii yesterday, Carter (at Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore) (US Defence Secretary Ashton Carter) again called for an immediate halt to China’s land reclamation activities, which the US insists are for military purposes. He made clear that the US would continue its “freedom of navigation” operations to challenge China’s territorial claims.

“There should be no mistake about this,” Carter declared, “the United States will fly, sail, and operate wherever international law allows, as we do around the world.”

Yes we got the message. Has there ever been such arrogance. This surpasses even the aspirations of Hitler who was a mere schoolboy in comparision. Really!

Trotsky.us says it is a global crisis in capitalism and the world capitalist states are beginning now to fight each other for survival.

Every single thing is connected to this crisis and survival. It may not appear so because the truth is hidden by millions of Media words.

But we can say even by a superficial observing this fight is led by the US elites in combination with Europe, especially Britain, and they are also striking up a unity with Islam in the form of chaos -creating ISIS and with the powerful Jihadists of Khomeini Revolution Iran.

The system is both bankrupt and dangerous.

There is indeed a direct line between this posturing of US Carter against China and its actions in the Middle East where (to give only one example) Gadhafi was toppled in a situation where Gadhafi had indeed gotten control of the situation and was crushing the Jihadists, the US and Europe (with the connivance of the Stalinists in Russia and China) to eliminate Gadhafi.

In many ways those scenes of Gadhafi being sodomised by Jihadists are a central motif of our times and indeed lead directly into the barbarity of ISIS actions inIraq and Syria.

My conclusión not just the mad savages and barbarian dogs of ISIS are dangerous but the whole capitalist system is a very dangerous thing. Dangerous for humans. Dangerous for all life.

All of these things are connected because it is ONE world unitary system (of capitalism)

To the casual glance they are not connected. It requires a special science to understand their interconnectedness. This is not conspiracy. It is the opposite. It is the scientific understanding of reality.

WHY THE RETICENCE TO LEARN FROM TROTSKY SINCE THE WORLD HAS BEEN HERE BEFORE:

A capitalist system in crisis tends to drive towards war: “”Our entire planet, its land and water areas … provide today the arena for a worldwide economy…Trotsky:

“This work has been accomplished by capitalism. But capitalism also compels the capitalist states to fight in order to subordinate this world economy to the profit interests of the respective national bourgeoisies…. [T]he objective meaning of the war consists in its destroying the existing national economic nests in the name of a world economy. But imperialism is seeking to solve this task … on the principles of an exploitation of world economy by the capitalist class of that victorious country which is to be transformed by the war from a great power to a world power.”
—War and the International, 1914

DIRTY NUCLEAR BOMB IN THE HANDS OF HIZBULLAH WILL CAUSE GREAT KILLING OF THE JEWS ONCE AGAIN

Antisemitism in countries in Europe and the antisemitism of Obama provides the cover for a great killing of the Jews in Israel.

This is a most serious warning to the world. It now emerges from this debka article that we have been concentrating on the wrong thing. We have been thinking of a rocket attacking Israel with a nuclear bomb on board.

But what debka has made clear here is that iran has the enriched uranium on hand, and that the trigger facility is on hand also. Hence Hizbullah on the border with Israel, essentially protected by UN forces, can explode dirty bombs against Israel.

But that would harm Arabs also, some antisemites may argue. The answer to that is the concept of suicide bombing. That specific concept makes that thought irrelevant.

Jew hatred is what drove Hitler and Jew hatred is what drove Hajj Amin el Husseini.

As Israeli leaders wrangle over Iran, a new US spy agency will deal with Tehran
DEBKAfileExclusive Report April 25, 2012, 5:38 PM (GMT+02:00)

Some fear they’ve missed the boat.

Israeli leaders were harshly criticized on the eve of Israel’s 64th Independence Day for too much speechifying and no real action against a nuclear Iran, whereas the US in contrast finally made a move by establishing a new Pentagon spy agency for gathering intelligence inside Iran. April 24 and 25, when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak addressed memorial ceremonies for the fallen, they reiterated the same old “Israel will not permit Iran to acquire nuclear arms” – a remark which the Israeli street has stopped taking seriously. Many members of military and intelligence circles are quoted by debkafile as believing that Israel may have waited too long and, along with the US, lost the initiative.
Jerusalem and Washington are still at odds on Iran, but the theme of their dispute has shifted. It is no longer about Iran’s timeline for building a bomb, but what kind. They agree that Tehran will not possess advanced nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles capable of penetrating the US and Israeli missile defenses any time soon. Israel is now worried about more primitive devices like the ones in the North Korean and Pakistani arsenals which Israeli believes are in the final stages of constructions.
The question in Israeli intelligence circles is this: Why is the impending North Korean nuclear test considered by the US, Japan and South Korea a major menace while no one seems to care about devices identical to the one Pyongyang plans to explode on the way to operational capability.

Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Strategic Affairs Moshe Ya’alon said publicly earlier this month that by the end of 2012, Iran would have a dirty bomb.
His disclosure drew no reactions, although it was a warning. A dirty bomb combines radioactive material with conventional explosives. Its chief danger is the spread of radioactive contamination. Cruder and cheaper to producer than a nuclear bomb, counter-terror agencies have long appreciated that it is easily transferred to terrorists. Ya’alon’s warning therefore means that Iran may soon be able to transfer dirty bombs to the Lebanese Hizballah units sitting on Israel’s northern border and the Palesinian Hamas and Jihad Islami in Gaza.
The Weekly Standard edition for publication on April 30 wrote the following sentence: “The supreme leader and his guards can have a nuclear weapon in their hands in as little as 43 days, provided Iran’s nuclear scientists have mastered the manufacture of a nuclear trigger – technically much less difficult than enrichment.”

The UN nuclear watchdog in Vienna and US intelligence officials have reported tests on nuclear materials conducted in recent weeks at the Parchin site near Tehran, to which access has been denied UN inspectors.

In Washington, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced was the formation of a new Pentagon spy agency called the Defense Clandestine Service. Defense Department sources said the new organization would expand the military’s intelligence and secret war efforts outside war zones in areas insufficiently covered until now, indicating deep penetration inside hostile territory, primarily Iran.

Other sources point out that by creating a new in-house Pentagon spy agency, Panetta and President Obama demonstrated their opinion of the quality of intelligence they were receiving from the CIA, of which the defense secretary was director until recently.

THE STIRRING UP OF HATRED AGAINST JEWS, ISRAEL AND ZIONISM IS WHAT MUST BE FOUGHT IN NORWAY AND IN EUROPE

File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-N0827-318, KZ Auschwitz, Ankunft ungarischer Juden.jpg

(Hungarian Jews arriving in Auschwitz in 1944…German Federal Archives)

The essence of the political situation in Norway, especially in its foreign policy, is support for “Palestinians” and for “Palestinian State”

Combined with hatred for Israel across the political sphere, but especially among what is misnamed as the left in Norway. We use this word very reluctantly.

The youth and children in the camp which Anders Breivik so brutally attacked were undoubtedly indoctrinated in this Jew Hatred. If they ever come to light the proceedings will demonstrate this antisemitism.

 

This was a double tragedy for these children, murdered by the individual terrorist killer in a most callous manner, also tragic in that they were indoctrinated into antisemitism.

Jew Hatred in our era has changed from hatred of the individual Jew and to hatred of Israel, of Zionism, and of the rights and needs of Israel to defend itself from Islam and from any form of antisemitism.

These children in this camp were all indoctrinated in this evil ideology.

The killer Breivik recognised this. His ACTIONS were brutal and pathological. But his recognition of the antisemitism in the left today was correct.

 

Note that does not provide ANY excuse to the killer Breivik. The way of human thought and of people ideology is that, GIVEN A CLEAR AND PRINCIPLED LEADERSHIP, many if not all of these youth could be won to an opposition toantisemitism, and to a clear theoretical understanding of the reactionary nature of Islam, and how islam is being used today by the ruling capitalist/imperialist class to enslave in body and mind alike.

 

But the so called “left” is betraying big time. These children cruelly murdered are victims not only of Breivik but are also victims of the left ideology which is heavily laced with antisemitism and ignorance of history.

 

In that regard the picture above showing Jews entering the Nazi Concentration Camp is very apt.

 

The Hizbullah leader has stated to the world what a good thing it is that all of the Jews are now concentrated in Israel where it will be possible to liquidate them

 

As pamela Geller has so wisely stated “Where is the outcry against Nasrullah!”

Iran is at present creating a Nuclear Bomb which will carry out that threat. There is not even a murmur about this from Hague, as he illegally expels the Libyan diplomats from Islam/Left controlled London.

Hamas is based on the whole idea of liquidationg all Jews and ending the state of Israel.

The OSLO peace Accords opened the door to endless butchery of Jewish people, as suicide Muslim murderers blew themselves and thousands of Jews up, to murder thousands of Jews and to maim for life many thousands.

All under the direction of OSLO who never wavered in their support for Arafat, who was masterminding the murdering of Jews.

 

That is the reality of Norway today. Norway supports all of that. And this should prompt us to look at the history of Jews in Norway during the Holocaust. This history was HIDDEN from the Norwegian children on that island on that weekend.

Wikipedia on the Holocaust in Norway:

In the middle of the occupation of Norway by Nazi Germany, there were at least 2,173 Jews in Norway. At least 775 of these were arrested, detained, and/or deported. 742 were murdered in the camps, 23 died as a result of extrajudicial execution, murder, and suicide during the war; bringing the total of Jewish Norwegian dead to at least 765, comprising 230 complete households.[1] In addition the few who survived the camps, the rest survived by fleeing the country, mostly to Sweden, but some also to the United Kingdom. A few also survived in camps in Norway or in hospitals, or in hiding.

Hajj Amin el Husseini was the driving force along with Himmler and Eichmann in the mass murder of the Jews. But in 1945 following this Holocaust of the Jews Hajj Amin el Husseini was allowed travel to Egypt by the forces of capitalism, US, france, Britain, and there hajj Amin el Husseini founded what is known today as the “Palestinians”, that is fatah/Hamas

It is this Fatah and Hamas that the Norwegian lefts have been so much behind in the last 2 decades

But not just the Norwegian lefts, ikt is the left in general. As we speak there is a delegation of British lefts associated with the British Labour Party on a Solidarity Visit to Hamas (which pledges with Iran a new Holocaust)

Following the German invasion and occupation, of Norway, and after the legitimate Norwegian government had left the country, German occupying authorities under the leadership of Reichskommissar Josef Terboven, put Norwegian civilian authorities under his control. This included various branches of Norwegian police, including the district sheriffs (Lensmannsetaten), criminal police, and order police. Uniquely Nazi police branches, including the Sicherheitsdienst and Gestapo, also became part of a network that served as tools for increasingly oppressive policies toward the Norwegian populace.[3]

Preparations

(Incorrect) estimate of the number of Jews presented at the Wannsee Conference

As a deliberate strategy, Terboven’s regime sought to use Norwegian, rather than German, officials to subjugate the Norwegian population. Although German police and paramilitary forces reported through the RSHA chain of command, and Norwegian police formally into the newly formed Department of Police, the actual practice was that Norwegian police officials took direction from the German RSHA.

Although several Jewish Norwegians already had been arrested and deported as political prisoners in the early months of the occupation, the first measure targeting all Jews was an order from the German foreign ministry made through Terboven that on 10 May 1941 the police of Oslo were to confiscate radios from all Jews in the city. Within days local sheriffs throughout the entire country received the same orders.

(Note what Wikipedia says here…local sheriffs, that means Norwegian people)

To identify Jewish Norwegians, the authorities relied on information from the police and telegraph services; also the synagogues in Oslo and Trondheim were ordered to produce full rosters of their members, including their names, date of birth, profession, and address. Jewish burial societies and youth groups were likewise ordered to produce their lists.

In August, the synagogues were also ordered to produce lists of Jewish individuals who were not members. The resulting lists were cross-referenced with information Nasjonal Samling had compiled previously and information from the Norwegian Central Bureau of statistics. In the end, occupying authorities in Norway had a more complete list of Jewish residents in Norway than most other countries under Nazi rule.[3][4][5][6]

On the basis of the lists compiled in the spring, the Justice Department and county governors started in the fall to register all Jewish property, including commercial holdings. A complete inventory was transmitted to the police department in December 1941, and this also included individuals who were suspected of having a Jewish background.

Anti-Semite graffiti on shop windows in Oslo in 1941.

On 20 December, the Norwegian Department of Police ordered 700 stamps with a 2 cm tall “J” for use by authorities to stamp the identification cards of Jewish individuals in Norway. These were put into use on 10 January 1942, when advertisements in the mainstream press ordered all Norwegian Jews to immediately present themselves at the local police stations to have their identification papers stamped. They were also ordered to complete an extensive form. For purposes of this registration, a Jew was identified as anyone who had at least three “full-Jewish” grandparents; anyone who had two “full-Jewish” grandparents and was married to a Jew; or was a member of a Jewish congregation. This registration showed that about 1,400 Jewish adults lived in Norway.

(see full report on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust_in_Norway)

 

CONCLUSION

 

Norway was and is a central focus of antisemitism in the world.

 

Jews feel particularly betrayed by the Norwegian people. First of all as the whole of the Wikipedia study makes clear, the Holocaust of the Jews in Germany was carried out by the German Nazis, but the German Nazis used the medium of the Norwegian Jew Haters and even Norwegians who did not hate Jews at all but who still carried out the Holocaust. That is conceivable.

 

That is the uncomfortable reality that the present day Norwegian elites have covered up. It is actually a clear form of Holocaust Denial.

 

And that antisemitism did not stop in 1945. How could it stop or why should it stop!

 

As the Irish man Conor Cruise O’Brien said “Antisemitism is a light sleeper”

 

Jews feel particularly betrayed by Norway for setting in place the Oslo Accords, which was really to elevate the followers of Hajj Amin el Husseini to statehood, out of which process came the murdering of so many Jews IN ISRAEL

 

This history has been hidden from these Norwegian children who were murdered last weekend. It is a history which must be learned.

CAROLINE GLICK POSES THE CENTRAL QUESTION…WHY FIGHT IF YOU DO NOT FIGHT TO WIN?

. THE ARTICLE BY GLICK IS VITAL TO READ. THE FACT IS THAT THE US GOVERNMENT(S) ARE IN ALLIANCE WITH ISLAM, WITH IRAN, WITH FATAH AND HAMAS, WITH THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD

IT IS A GREAT ARTICLE BECAUSE CAROLINE IS OUTLINING THE ACTUAL AND TRUTHFUL SITUATION IN THE LEBANON AND THE ROLE THERE OF HISBULLAH

 

 

FIRST MY COMMENT (JUST SUBMITTED)

Marcel

 

You sound so like a preacher man

 

And your politics lead you into an abyss of hopelessness and helplessness

 

Also you attack a great many of the Jewish people of Israel who do not believe in the supernatural but who are prepared to fight for Israel as much as any (believing in the supernatural) Jew.

 

You also are very divisive because you insult people who believe in secularism and you confuse that secularism with hatred of religion and of Jewish tradition

 

And where is your political programme?

 

If Netenyahu was elected because of Livni and Olmert betrayal, and if Netanyahu in September is preparing to betray also, what then? Apart from your preaching and slagging off atheists what do you concretely propose?

 

The reference above to Livni is indeed correct. I heard her in an interview and while she may be an intelligent person she spoke in a dreary and mechanical fashion, mainly because her programme, and also the programme of what you call the “Left” is indeed also dreary. Her words were in synch with her programme.

 

There is need now for a revolutionary leadership in Israel. But in saying so I place down one caveat, which is that when Israeli political leaders like Netanyahu come under attack from anti-Semites in US and EU, as well as from anti-Semitic Jews in Israel, then he must be defended, critically, but defended nevertheless. I am not going to enter into a barging match over Leon Trotsky, but for sure the time has come to build a Trotskyist party in Israel, which will place itself at the forefront of the struggle, and will seek to create a unity with patriotic Jews who fight from the perspective of Judaism

 

My website is www.4international.wordpress.com

 

THAT COMMENT WAS SUBMITTED NO 5 TO THIS ARTICLE BY GLICK

 

The path to the next Lebanon War

July 12, 2011, 2:42 AM

 

 | 

 

 | 

 

 

 

 

Five years ago this week, Iran’s Lebanese proxy opened war with Israel. The war lasted 34 days, during which Hezbollah launched more than 4,000 missiles against Israel. Now five years later, under US President Barack Obama, America is pushing a policy that drastically escalates the chance that a new war between Israel and Iran’s Lebanese army will break out again in the near future.

 

Back in 2006, Israel’s response to Hezbollah’s aggression was swift but incompetent. While Israel scored some blows against the Iranian proxy force, the war ended with Hezbollah still shooting. Israel failed to defeat the terror army. And because Hezbollah survived, it won the war.

 

This truth is exposed in all its ugliness by the political and military realities five years on. Today, Hezbollah is not simply in charge of Israel’s former security zone in South Lebanon.

 

It is in charge of all of Lebanon. The Hezbollah-controlled government controls all aspects of the Lebanese state that it wishes. These include the military, the telecommunications networks, and the international borders, airports and sea ports, among other things.

 

Today, Hezbollah has not merely refilled its depleted missile arsenals. It has tripled the size of its missile arsenals. In 2006, IAF strikes in the first 24 hours of the war knocked out all of Hezbollah’s long-range missiles. Today, not only have those stocks been replenished, Hezbollah’s arsenal includes missiles with ranges covering all of Israel, with larger payloads and many with guidance systems.

 

The lessons of the war are easy to see. And the Israeli public, which learned them five years ago, still hasn’t forgotten them.

 

GENERALLY SPEAKING, the war taught us three lessons. The first lesson is that you can’t convince terrorists to lay down their arms simply by walking away. Israel withdrew from its security zone in southern Lebanon in 2000. The withdrawal was a precursor to its withdrawal from Gaza in 2005. In 2006, Israel was attacked from both territories.

 

In the lead-up to both withdrawals, Israel’s national leadership told the public that the only reason terrorists from these territories were attacking us was that we were there. If we went away, they would stop hating us and we would be safe. We were the problem, not them, so we could solve the problem by giving them what they wanted.

 

Although then-prime minister Ehud Olmert and then-foreign minister Tzipi Livni continued to push appeasement through their insistence that Israel surrender Judea and Samaria, the war of 2006 showed the public the folly of their plans. And at first opportunity, the public elected the Likud and other right-wing parties – which oppose appeasement – to form the current government.

 

The second lesson the public learned is that when a nation goes to war against an enemy that seeks its destruction, it must fight to win. You cannot fight a half-war against an implacable foe. And if you fail to win, you lose.

 

This is not how Israel fought the war of 2006. Partially due to pressure from then-secretary of state Condoleezza Rice and partially due to his own strategic incomprehension, Olmert believed it was possible to fight to a draw without losing.

 

In the event, there was only one way for Israel to defeat Hezbollah – by regaining control over southern Lebanon. Any other conclusion to the war would leave Hezbollah standing. And simply by surviving intact, as Lebanese Druse leader Walid Jumblatt warned at the time, the road would be paved for Hezbollah to take over Lebanon.

 

But Olmert – and Livni – wouldn’t even consider retaking control of South Lebanon. The option was discarded contemptuously as a delusional recipe for forcing Israel back into the “Lebanese quagmire.” The fact that the “Lebanese quagmire” came to Israel after we left Lebanon, and that it will only end when Israel defeats Hezbollah, was completely ignored.

 

Olmert’s and Livni’s reason for rejecting the one strategy that would have brought Israel victory is explained by the third lesson of the war. That lesson is that once a leader is ideologically committed to a policy of appeasement, he is unable to allow rational considerations to permeate his thinking.

 

THE OLMERT government was elected in 2006 on the basis of its plan to repeat the Lebanon and Gaza withdrawals in Judea and Samaria. During the war, Olmert told his supporters that victory in Lebanon would enable him to carry out his planned withdrawal from Judea and Samaria. And this was true. But because of the circular logic of appeasement, there was no way that Olmert could fight to win.

 

If Israel had retaken control of southern Lebanon, Olmert would have had a chance of convincing the public that unilateral withdrawal was a viable strategy. He would have been able to argue that just as the IDF retook control of southern Lebanon, so it would retake control of Judea and Samaria if the Palestinians used the vacated lands to attack the rest of the country.

 

But because he was committed to appeasement, Olmert could not fight to win in Lebanon. The appeasement agenda is predicated on the disavowal of the notion of military victory and the embrace of the mantra, “There is no military solution.”

 

IN THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH CAROLINE GLICK RAISES THE TRULY CENTRAL QUESTION…WHY FIGHT IF YOU DO NOT FIGHT TO WIN?

If victory is an option, then surrender along the lines that Olmert preached in Judea and Samaria is also an option. That is, surrender is an option, not an imperative, as he claimed. And if victory is an option, then clearly it has much more to recommend it than defeat.

 

But with their appeasement agenda reigning supreme – as appeasement agendas always do – instead of fighting to win, Olmert and Livni sued for a cease-fire. That is, they sought a diplomatic solution to a military problem. And since by not losing, Hezbollah won the military contest, it also came out the victor in UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which set the conditions of the cease-fire.

 

Resolution 1701 was a massive victory for Hezbollah. The resolution placed the international terror group run by Iran on equal footing with Israel, a sovereign state. The security arrangements in the resolution were an invitation for Hezbollah to rearm. It was pure fantasy to believe that the Hezbollah-dominated Lebanese government would block Hezbollah’s rearmament. And it was utter madness to think that European military forces would lift a finger to prevent Hezbollah from reasserting full control over the border with Israel.

 

But again, if you accept the circular logic of appeasement – that always puts the burden of proof on the non-aggressor – then you will never learn these, or any other lessons. And as a consequence, appeasers will always and forever foment wars in the name of peace.

 

THE ISRAELI public learned these lessons and elected a government that understands them. Perhaps if the American people had elected Senator John McCain to succeed George W. Bush in 2008, the US government would have learned these lessons as well. And then maybe together the Israeli and the US governments might have set about fixing at least some of the damage the war caused them both.

 

But in their wisdom, the American people elected Barack Obama to succeed Bush in the White House. And Obama has learned none of the lessons of the last war. Consequently Obama’s current policies are increasing the likelihood of another war between Israel and Iran’s Lebanese proxy in the near future.

 

Far from recognizing the nature of Hezbollah, the Obama administration has tried to wish away its implacability. Last May, Obama’s counter-terrorism adviser John Brennan spoke of the administration’s plan to cultivate “moderate elements” in the Iranian-run jihadist organization.

 

The Obama administration’s notion that the US can adopt a nuanced approach to the terror group is put paid by Hezbollah’s takeover of the Lebanese government, its growing capabilities in the Western hemisphere, its continued devotion to the cause of Israel’s destruction, its participation in the killing of Syrian anti-regime protesters, and Iran’s clear control over all aspects of the organization’s operations. And yet, by all accounts, the administration refuses to acknowledge that there can be no nuance toward Hezbollah.

 

The dangers of Obama’s rejection of these basic truths were exposed this week. Sunday the government approved the demarcation of Israel’s territorial waters along the border with Lebanon. The borders will be submitted to the UN.

 

Israel’s move was forced on it by the Obama administration.

 

The dispute over the sea border arose after Israel discovered massive quantities of natural gas in its territorial waters in 2009. Acting on orders from Hezbollah and Iran, the Lebanese government immediately claimed erroneously that the waters belonged to Lebanon. Last August, Lebanon submitted its claim to the UN.

 

Israel negotiated its maritime borders with Cyprus in 2007. The same year, Cyprus also negotiated its maritime borders with Lebanon. At the time, Lebanon did not claim the areas in which Israel has discovered natural gas deposits or the areas abutting those areas, which are suspected of similarly containing large natural gas deposits. Lebanon’s current claim includes Israel’s territorial waters abutting the gas fields it discovered in 2009.

 

In staking this false claim, as it did with the Shaba Farms on Mount Dov in the Golan Heights in 2000, Lebanon is setting up a casus belli against Israel.

 

Under the circumstances, the only rational policy that the US can possibly adopt is to loudly and strenuously back Israel’s claim and reject all Lebanese contentions to the contrary.

 

Only by completely rejecting Lebanon’s claim can the US deny Hezbollah and Iran the ability to use Israel’s gas finds in its territorial waters as a justification for war.

 

Rather than do this, guided by its appeasement ideology, the Obama administration has refused to take sides. It urged Israel to submit its counter-claim to the UN – where it can bully Israel into accepting arbitration of the dispute by the inherently anti-Israel UN.

 

More generally, by refusing to take sides, the US is in fact siding with its enemy Iran and Iran’s proxy Hezbollah against its ally Israel.

 

Originally published in The Jerusalem Post. 

 

Thanks to Caroline Glick on http://www.carolineglick.com/e/2011/07/the-path-to-the-next-lebanon-w.php#_login

NASRULLAH AND HIZBULLAH ARE ARMED WITH THE LATEST JEW KILLING WEAPONRY

by Felix Quigley

February 19, 2009

Everything about the Middle East indicates that the Arab Fascists and wider Islamists as in Indonesia are preparing for full on conflict with Israel. Along with the moves by Egypt in the desert of Sinai indicating war with Israel it is not looking like Nasrullah of Hizbullah is boasting that he is armed with the latest weaponry, from Iran, or Russia, or China, or North Korea, all possible via Iran

[Begin report on Hisbullah war plans from Debkafile here]

Nasrallah hints at Hizballah’s access to anti-air missiles

DEBKAfile Special Report

February 16, 2009

Hizballah’s secretary-general Hassan Nasrallah declared Monday, Feb. 16 that his terrorist organization is fully entitled to arm itself with every kind of weapon “including anti-air missiles in its struggle against Israel.”

For two years, all his speeches have been delivered by video link – never live. DEBKAfile reported earlier that sophisticated air defense missile batteries capable of attack Israeli warplanes and helicopters were poised in depots on the Syrian-Lebanese border for delivery to Hizballah.

Nasrallah did not confirm or deny that delivery had taken place. Our sources add that Israel recently warned Syria that the delivery of ground-to-air missiles to Hizballah would represent the crossing of a red line.

Israeli defense minister Ehud Barak said earlier this month that such weapons “would change the strategic balance and force Israel to act.”

This of course has got to make all socialists who defend Israel very angry indeed. It is just weeks ago that Fascist Leftists were parading around with Antisemites of Islamofascist terrorist organizations carrying placards that go right back tot he Nazi propaganda against the Jews pre Holocaust.

http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=5912

The threats of a Holocaust are there. The Fascist arms are there. Who is to say that there will not be a Holocaust of the Jews IN Israel?

Is there an alternative? Of course there is and it involves gaining the support of the workers in every country for the Jews and for Israel. These Fascist Leftists do not represent the good ordinary working class people, although they can be influenced by these Fascists on the Left propaganda machine which continually lie and slander the Jews.