JEWS FACE ONLY WAR AGAINST US EMPIRE AND AGAINST ISLAMIC JIHAD…THUS NEED TROTSKYIST LEADERSHIP

Britain opposed the Jewish state in 1948 (Haifa) and US Empire is now the enemy of the Jews

 

What Martin Sherman leaves out of this analysis is the most important factor of all. This factor exists in the form of a reality, a certain reality that must be addressed before any other.

 

That factor is the existence in the world of the US Empire and its lapdogs in NATO and the EU.

 

ISIL is important, of course it is but the drive behind ISIL is not only the Islamic Jihad rooted in the Koran, but also (perhaps I could say more and more) it is the actions of Empire with its EU and NATO in tow on the world scene.

 

How far back to go? Well I would certainly go back to the role of the US post 1945 when the US ruling class recruited all of the Nazis into their government and especially into their intelligence services. Edward Snowden is an issue for all Jews and it must be an issue of how Jews can support that American freedom fighter.

 

What WAS the Second World War fought for then? So that the US ruling class could co-opt the Nazis. Is that it?

 

A key part of this growing Empire, the British Government, rather than giving the new state of the Jews a fair wind in 1948, in fact openly brought Nazis into Palestine to fight the Jews.

 

Moving forward a bit who was it that insisted on the PLO being rescued after the PLO was routed in the Lebanon War in 2002? It was the then US President and all of the prestige of Empire which did that. Many Jewish soldiers had laid down their lives for the US President to do that to the Jews.

 

The actual “philosophical” basis for the rescue of the PLO was the propaganda and actions of the Churches and especially of the Vatican

(see http://emperors-clothes.com/vatican/pressure.htm)

 

I have got one, and only one, criticism of the analysis of Martin Sherman because I agree with almost all, but it is a weighty criticism all the same. Sherman is basically asking the key question but not giving any answer: Why are the Jews of Israel, this very significant nation of people, continuing to elect (and I use the word after some thought) douchebags like Netanyahu.

 

Netanyahu seems to have absolutely no backbone at all. I wonder if Netanyahu has been kept alive politically by means of the valiant sacrifice of his brother. But however this man is the wrong man to lead Israel in a period of warfare.

 

The answer which Martin Sherman does not give to the question which is inherent in everything that he writes which is that the Israeli people, a valiant people, continue to elect such douchebags as Netanyahu because (I emphasize most strongly) no other alternative is being offered to the Israeli people.

 

It needs a new leadership (however that can be created I myself thinking that it must be based on Trotskyist principles)

 

Such a leadership will be democratic, centralized, theoretical, a cadre based on history. It will as a first step break up, expel or imprison (with capital punishment restored for crimes against Jews) both Fatah and Hamas

 

The new war of the Jews is actually against two main foes. One of these is a very old enemy of the Jews indeed and that is the forces of Islam and Mohammedan Jihad. But the second is war against Empire, that is against the same Empire which in the 1990s made war against the Serbs ON BEHALF OF THAT JIHAD, and on that basis also removed Saddam, removed Mubarak, Ben Ali and Gadhafi, all of whom were secular dictators, to open the door to precisely the ISIL situation Sherman refers to. My reference above indicates that I believe that the Vatican is central to this Empire. The present Pope Francis is all about drawing closer to Islamic Jihad in Catholic Nigeria, and everywhere that Christians are slaughtered daily.

 

A war on two fronts! Sad as it really is that is the only reality for the Jews. I wish it could be peaceful admiring of the grass growing in your garden but alas cannot be that.

 

OBAMA WILL NOT ACT AGAINST ISIL HEADCHOPPERS BECAUSE HE SUPPORTS JIHAD

Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer are wrong about Obama and ISIL in Iraq.

Pamela and Robert are both freedom fighters against Islamic Jihad and because they are freedom fighters were barred from entering Britain by the fast-becoming Fascist British Imperialist Government

This illegal action against Robert and Pamela by the British Imperialists WENT UNANSWERED BY THE FASCIST “LEFTS”

NOTICE THAT WE PUT LEFT IN INVERTED COMMAS which means that we on 4international do not consider them left or socialist

And today we learn on the websites that Socialist Unity is threatening a socialist with legal action using the British reactionary libel laws. THESE THINGS ARE ALL RELATED…

http://hurryupharry.org/2014/06/11/socialist-disunity/

BACK TO ROBERT, PAMELA AND MANY OTHER OF OUR FRIENDS IN THE ANTI JIHAD MOVEMENT

WHY THEY ARE QUITE WRONG…

Basically Pamela and Robert are saying that US Imperialism (Obama) is acting like the “bungling bear in the china shop” in the sense that it inadvertently keeps knocking over the tables of china

The bungling bear like Bush on Saddam (2003) are really kindly bungling bears but they are just a bit clumsy and keep bumping into things. That is the analysis of Pamela and Robert and it even extends to Obama who is Islam sympathetic (at least)

That is because Pamela and Robert are themselves the servants of US Imperialism.

Look at it from this angle however. The US system of capitalism is in crisis. There could be another and deeper collapse of shares and whole economy in many countries. This pulls US elites AND OTHERS LIKE SPAIN towards Fascism and Dictatorsjhip.

On dictatorship look at the hatred that Pamela showed towards Edward Snowden who was MERELY WARNING OF PLANS TOWARDS DICTATORSHIP

The Alliance of US is more and more with the likes of ISIL, with the head choppers, and that is nothing to what they will do in the Homeland US to the workers, youth and unorthodox guys like Ed Snowden

If they were serious in opposing these Arab Muslim Fascists what would the US and EU do? They would immediately rush troops to destroy ISIL (WHICH IS ONLY A FEW THOUSANDS OF FASCISTS)

Obama ruled that out! Hillary Clinton this morning on BBC ruled that out also and supported Obama inaction! Cameron does not care! The EU governments only care about boycott on Israel.

So these US and EU political elites are on the side of the headchoppers of Islam

Meanwhile as we mentioned the Socialist Unity Fascist “Lefts” are taking a legal action based on the reactionary British Libel Laws against a real socialist in Britain. Typical. That is the most Fascist thing that can be done! Stop the discussion by all means is the method of Socialist Unity.

Stopping necessary discussion and using the state libel laws is exactly what Fascists do.

4international will defend socialists against Fascists who aim to stop discussion. That is exactly what Socialist Unity is aiming to do. They are not Socialists they are Fascists in the guise of socialists. 4international says expose Socialist Unity for what they really are. We will not be silenced so more articles by us on this Socialist Unity

4international will really examine carefully the politics of this group and we will try to answer the question as to what makes Socialist Unity so easily reach for the Libel Laws of Britain, the most reactionary Fascist Laws on the planet.

Shame on them.

Call for the defence of Robert and Pamela against these same British Fascists in the British State Machine who banned them from Britain.

BUSH WAR ON SADDAM TODAY EVEN MORE OF A DISASTER AS POOR ARABS FLEE ISIL FASCISTS

The extent of territory known to be influenced by the group in January 2014. Out of date as of June 10th 2014

 

(From The Telegraph Online)

The militants are believed to be from the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), the joint Iraqi-Syrian al-Qaida affiliate that is also fighting President Bashar al-Assad’s regime in neighbouring Syria. Seizing control of Mosul, which lies on a stretch of the Tigris less than 100 miles from the Syrian border, would help the group in its aim of carving out a swathe of uncontested territory straddling the two borders.

 

How much suffering?

How many Beheadings?

How many rapes?

 

Yesterday on Talk Radio Europe there was a woman on the panel who actually defended Obama when I said that Obama was Islam. How can such a person get onto a radio panel? What qualifies her?

 

How much suffering is the policy of Obama towards Islam going to cause these Arabs who are fleeing from Al Qaida in Northern Iraq, Mosul?

 

And as regards the woman defending Islam and Obama how much ignorance can grown people have?

 

Bush went to war against Saddam. Tony Blair and his whole British state joined in. That was a fatal move.

The “Left” Fascists such as the Anti War Movement took to the streets of London and Dublín in opposition. That movement was reactionary and false however because the real reason it was necessary to defend Saddam (Baathist regime brutal and mad) was that the secular Baathists were a defence against Al Qaida. The “Left” Fascists in taking to the streets were really defending Al Qaida. Notice that I place left in inverted commas. These are Fascists. They are also Antisemites. We on 4international are true Trotskyism and we oppose these Fascists who attack the jewish Homeland.

 

Bush and Blair were opening the door to Al Qaida in Iraq. Or in other words to the entrance of the Jihad based on the Quran into Iraq. And so these poor Arabs today flee in millions from Mosul. It only takes a moment of reflection to see that the “Left” fascists in the anti-war movement of the time were actually on the side of Al Qaida, and the consequences of the Bush War has had the same result.

 

In fact the necessary defence of Saddam Hussein then is very like the necessary defence of Assad today (but critical of Assad’s Alliance with Iran and Hizbullah) are very similar.

 

there are times when you have to defend dictators in politics because the lesser evil often is the rule.

 

This issue came up very often in the 1930s and there is a memorable retelling of an Aesop Fable by Leon Trotsky. It is about taking decisions to defend a particular position from Fascists, and Al Qaida is Fascism

 

AN AESOP FABLE

From What Next? Vital Question for the German Proletariat, 1932

* * *

A cattle dealer once drove some bulls to the slaughterhouse. And the butcher came night with his sharp knife.

“Let us close ranks and jack up this executioner on our horns,” suggested one of the bulls.

“If you please, in what way is the butcher any worse than the dealer who drove us hither with his cudgel?” replied the bulls, who had received their political education in Manuilsky’s institute. [The Comintern.]

“But we shall be able to attend to the dealer as well afterwards!”

“Nothing doing,” replied the bulls firm in their principles, to the counselor. “You are trying, from the left, to shield our enemies — you are a social-butcher yourself.”

And they refused to close ranks.