Truly a dangerous individual is this “Joe McCarthy in a skirt” Pamela Geller

Pamela Geller is a servant of US Imperialism and so she is at present totally silent on the Ukrainian issue. This means she supports Fascists. Silence here equals support. She also projects herself as an opponent of Islamic Jihad and in certain ways she is. But how can those two things go together, that is a servant of US Imperialism, and also against Islamic Jihad, remembering that Islamic Jihad is promoted by all branches of US and EU Imperialism? This is a big question for Jews who also face the Jihad of the “Palestinians”. This needs to be discussed.

The following will help us to see through this “conundrum:

Pamela Geller has opened up a big campaign against the NY Mayor Bill de Blasio. Geller calls him a “Communist”. Is that true or false? Can Geller be serious here?

Bill de Blasio from what I can learn is part of that Stalinist cum pro Islam and Antisemitic “Left”, by this I mean what is called the “Left”

The question that Geller must be forced to address is if de Blasio is Stalinist how is he Communist.

In other words is Stalinism the same as Communism?

Or is Trotskyism the same as Stalinism?

Or is what Lenin fought for the same as what Lenin and the Bolsheviks fought for.

Those are actually very basic questions and they are also questions which ARE answerable. It involves a Project in political life which is doable.

Geller and Spencer are “tricky” and an example of this is the way they use the “Sandanistas” to attack de Blasio, but there are a couple of issues here which they do not raise never mind answer. The first issue was the role of Reagan and of US Imperialism in Central America against the South American people. It is very telling that Geller and Spencer are hiding this. The second issue that these “tricky duo” do not raise is were the Sandanistas Communists or Stalinists, and if the Sandanistas were allied with the East German Stalinists does that not mean that the Sandanista Leadership was in essence a Stalinist leadership? Whatever the answer it is very clear that in Spencer and in Geller we are dealing with subterfuge which is indeed dangerous for us all, and also for Jews. As I said, “tricky”!

There are two main problems, Geller and 4international

1. Problem of Geller is that she labels people like Bill de Blasio as being a Communist. Geller thus is a big confuser of issues. She may sound good to some people but that is based on ignorance and offers no education. Geller and Spencer confuse, do not enlighten!

2. Problem of Geller for 4international is that she confuses and muddies, but in order to tackle this the 4international needs to engage in a “Project”. By this I mean that this understanding of what Geller is at, which is deliberately confusing Stalinism with Trotskyism, has to be struggled for. I am very sad to say thaat this kind of knowledge does not grow on tres and all that a Young person today has to do is reach up and grab a fruit (of knowledge). No sadly no!

Geller engages in anti-Jihad activity. But so do we on 4international. Islam is a Nazi ideology as expressed in the Muftí and Hitler coming together in the Holocaust against the Jews.

But Geller is also in that Hitler camp, because she is an anti-communist, like Diana West, another “Joe McCarthy in skirts”.

Her McCarthyism is leading her to support Fascists against Russia in a new World War.

Truly a dangerous individual is this “Joe McCarthy in a skirt” Pamela Geller

Dangerous especially to the Jews

ROBERT SPENCER OF JIHADWATCH SPEAKS THE TRUTH OVER FILM AND HEBDO. THE LEFT SHOULD BE ASHAMED.

‘I’m not the one going into the streets

with stones and Kalashnikovs’:

Charlie Hebdo editor rejects responsibility for

violence over naked Mohammad cartoons

 

SAYS ROBERT SPENCER OF JIHADWATCH…LEFT SHOULD LISTEN AND LEARN

 

Has the whole world gone mad? Why is this even a question? Let’s say you call me a racist, bigoted Islamophobe. I am deeply insulted. At that moment I have a huge range of options before me. I can calmly explain to you that Islamic supremacism is not a race, fighting for free speech and equality of rights for all is not bigotry, and “Islamophobia” is a manipulative concept used by the Muslim Brotherhood and its allies to stifle resistance to Islamic supremacism and jihad. Or I can start yelling and calling you names. Or I can start muttering into my vodka tonic about the injustice of it all. Or I can murder you, drag your body through the streets, set fire to your embassy, and demand laws against insulting me. Or I can do any number of other things.

Which one will I choose? It’s up to me, not to you. You might have a strong hunch as to how I will react, and say to your companion, “That Spencer, he is going to come out with another windy, closely reasoned refutation of my charges that everyone will ignore,” or “That Spencer, he is going to burn down my embassy,” but you still can’t be absolutely sure what I am going to do, because I am not an automaton, I am a human being endowed with the faculty of reason, and I may always choose to react in a way that will surprise you.

Or I may not. But in any case, it is up to me. If I kill you, there is absolutely no justifiable basis on which anyone could say, “Well, he had it coming. Look how he provoked him.” My choice was my own, and only I bear responsibility for it.

But today that basic and elemental truth is lost. If Muslims rage, riot and murder for any reason, they bear no responsibility. The only ones who bear any responsibility for their raging, rioting and murdering are the non-Muslims who somehow provoked them.

That I have to take the time to explain this at all, and that it will be universally ignored, is an indication of how much our public discourse has degenerated. The road is being swiftly paved for the destruction of the freedom of speech. When, in another year or so, I am safely imprisoned for daring to speak the truth and a new era of peace has dawned between the West and the Islamic world, and yet the jihad keeps coming, and the full implications of the new “hate speech” laws start to become clear in the quashing of all political dissent, don’t say you weren’t warned.

Of course, maybe none of that will happen, and the freedom of speech will suddenly sport a thousand articulate defenders who have not yet been completely demonized and marginalized out of the public square. But I don’t see them on the horizon right now.

 

 

THE CHARLIE HEBDO EDITOR REJECTS ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR VIOLENCE. WELL SAID

“‘I’m not the one going into the streets with stones and Kalashnikovs’: Charlie Hebdo editor rejects responsibility for violence over naked Mohammad cartoons,” by Nicholas Vinocur for Reuters, September 19 (thanks to Kenneth):

The editor of French magazine Charlie Hebdo has said that when his magazine ridiculed the Prophet Mohammad on Wednesday by portraying him naked in cartoons, he and his organization were not responsible for fuelling the anger of Muslims around the world who are already incensed by a video depicting him as a lecherous fool.The editor, Stephane Charbonnier, also known as Charb, rejected criticism. “We have the impression that it’s officially allowed for Charlie Hebdo to attack the Catholic far-right but we cannot poke fun at fundamental Islamists,” he said.

“It shows the climate. Everyone is driven by fear, and that is exactly what this small handful of extremists who do not represent anyone want: to make everyone afraid, to shut us all in a cave,” he told Reuters.

“Muhammad isn’t sacred to me,” he said in an interview at the weekly’s offices on the northeast edge of Paris. “I don’t blame Muslims for not laughing at our drawings. I live under French law; I don’t live under Koranic law.”

Charbonnier said he had no regrets and felt no responsibility for any violence.

“I’m not the one going into the streets with stones and Kalashnikovs,” he said. “We’ve had 1,000 issues and only three problems, all after front pages about radical Islam.”

One cartoon alluded to the scandal over a French magazine’s publication of topless photos of the wife of Britain’s Prince William. It showed a bare female torso topped by a beard with the caption “Riots in Arab countries after photos of Mrs Mohammad are published”….

“We know that these images will be deeply offensive to many and have the potential to be inflammatory. But we’ve spoken repeatedly about the importance of upholding the freedom of expression that is enshrined in our constitution,” White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters.

“In other words, we don’t question the right of something like this to be published, we just question the judgment behind the decision to publish it.”…

 

That’s the first step.

9-11 ANNIVERSARY TODAY…Reluctance to tell the truth about Islam has done such damage

Reluctance to tell the truth about Islam has done such damage.

 

On this anniversary day of 9-11 there is no better tribute than to publish the outstanding essay and video by Dr. Bill Warner, which is the most thought provoking essay I have ever read on Islam. 

 

Prepare to have your mind opened.

 

Everybody is talking about it: Why it is so difficult to teach what Islam is really about? And Dr. Warner gives the answer to that in a most satisfactory fashion.

 

{This essay is so important we have placed it in the “pages” section of this website. It goes under the heading of “http://4international.me/the-utter-depravity-and-cruelty-of-historical-islam-jihad-has-never-been-told/}

 

It is fitting that we should include a look at Karen Armstrong, not only does she lie about Islam but she is a good example of this.

 

In thinking about the lies and deception surrounding Islam and 9-11 over the past eleven years my mind “lit on” none other than that liar Karen Armstrong.

 

 I came upon a piece in Wiki which is rather good. It follows at the end.

 

On this eleventh anniversary I am in particular indebted to Jihadwatch, Atlas Shrugs and Gates of Vienna, sites which I consider to be the most important in understanding Islam.

The url for the Gates of Vienna transcription and video is http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com.es/2012/09/why-we-are-afraid-1400-year-secret.html#more

 

Once again the url for our article which will always appear at the side and on the main page of our site is:

http://4international.me/the-utter-depravity-and-cruelty-of-historical-islam-jihad-has-never-been-told/

 

 

 

Says Gates of Vienna about this great work by Dr. Warner on Islam:

Dr. Bill Warner is the founder of the Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI). The video below records a talk he gave recently about the real history of Islam, and why there is such a powerful tendency towards collective amnesia about it in the West.

His account of the destruction of classical civilization by the Great Jihad is a superb follow-up to Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited by Emmet Scott, which was examined at length here last month.

This is possibly the best concise exposition of the history of Islamic violence that I have ever heard

ONLY 4INTERNATIONAL FIGHTS FOR JEWS, FIGHTS FOR SERBS, OPPOSES NATO/UN DOWN THE LINE

WHY DO OUR JEWISH FRIENDS STAND BY AND WATCH THIS UNADULTERATED CRAP FROM NATO/UN/ICTY ABOUT MUAMMAR GADHAFI AND VIAGRA (!!!) AND DO NOTHING TO ANSWER…JEEEZ!

These lies from NATO/UN are going unanswered

 

Where is the campaigning by our friends in defence of Israel campaign on these lies from this liar of liars, Moreno-Ocampo, who heads the ICTY, otherwise known as the Hague Kangaroo Court.

 

Where is Robert Spencer on these lies?

 

Where is Pamela Geller on these latest lies, even though Pamela does more than most,  she has still got an equivalent position on this issue of defence of Gadhafi against NATO/UN/Muslim Brotherhood alliance?

 

This is always the same pattern.

 

The NATO lies keep coming out, this time it is against Muammar Gadhafi, then it was the Serbs

CRAP FROM THE TELEGRAPH.CO.UK

“They were buying containers to enhance the possibility to rape women,” he said.

“We had doubts at the beginning but now we are more convinced that he decided to punish using rapes,” the prosecutor said.

He told reporters at the UN in New York that he had collected evidence suggesting the Libyan leader had decided to punish women by using rape as a weapon in the hope that it would instil fear and curb dissent.

In March, a Libyan woman, Eman al-Obeidi, made headlines around the world after she burst into a Tripoli hotel and said she had been raped by Gaddafi’s troops. She is recovering at a refugee centre in Romania.

“It was very bad – beyond the limits, I would say,” Mr Moreno-Ocampo added

So I ask the key question. Are Serbs only going to fight for Serbs? Are Jews only going to fight for Jews?

We are talking here about the swamp of middle class nationalism.

Everybody knows our 4international defence of the Serbs, our 4international defence of the Jews and Israel.

But we are first and foremost opposed to the NATO/UN dictatorship over the world and its alliance with Sharia

 

There is NO difference in this key respect between the NATO WAR ON ISRAEL and THE NATO WAR ON THE SERBS and THE NATO WAR ON MUAMMAR GADHAFI and THE OTHER WARS OF NATO in our beautiful but under capitalism sorry world

 

I mean these lies about viagra and Gaddhafi troops raping women have been going around since Sunday night/Monday morning

 

Jeeez How long does it take for people (like Pamela, Ted and Robert) with instant blogs to take up a position.

THEY ARE BLATANT LIES!

IT IS NATO/UN PSYOPS AGAINST MUAMMAR GADHAFI!

TAKE A POSITION! FIGHT THEM! OR FOLD YOUR CARDS AND GET OUT!

 

 

 

“They were buying containers to enhance the possibility to rape women,” he said.

“We had doubts at the beginning but now we are more convinced that he decided to punish using rapes,” the prosecutor said.

He told reporters at the UN in New York that he had collected evidence suggesting the Libyan leader had decided to punish women by using rape as a weapon in the hope that it would instil fear and curb dissent.

In March, a Libyan woman, Eman al-Obeidi, made headlines around the world after she burst into a Tripoli hotel and said she had been raped by Gaddafi’s troops. She is recovering at a refugee centre in Romania.

“It was very bad – beyond the limits, I would say,” Mr Moreno-Ocampo added.