THE WHOLE OF THE ISRAELI RULING CLASS ARE TRAITORS TO THE JEWS…OUR ANSWER TO MARTIN SHERMAN

Gaza Betrayal by Jewish leaders

TED BELMAN OF ISRAPUNDIT TAKES CENTRIST POSITION ON NETANYAHU

The issue was really over the nature of the whole Israeli ruling class, whatever they may be called. The disagreement between Ted Belman editor of Israpundit and Francisco Gil White was about that.

Gil White had called Netanyahu a traitor. I agreed with him but I go much further because I call the whole of the Israeli leaders right across the board traitors. Big difference. But let us not stray. How did Belman react to Gil White? It is most instructive to see what Belman wrore:

I disagree with Gil-White’s conclusion.  Everyone involved with Oslo from the start knew of the Nazi connection and chose to ignore it.  I don’t see continuing it as treason but as stupidity or naivete.  Ted Belman

 

http://www.israpundit.com/archives/63591148

 

A strange response by Ted Belman

 

USEFUL ANALOGY

A similar situation is that your friend is being conned by a conman out of his life savings and you sitting there beside your friend while this is going on know he is a conman, but your friend does not, and you say nothing. If you do that you are not a friend, not naive, not stupid, but you are a traitor to your friend

 

The same applies with all these political leaders in Israel. Call them right call them left, whatever (AND if you do that just shows your political and historical ignorance)

 

MORE ON THE CONMAN ANALOGY

The Jews are being continually conned here by the US Government. They were conned over OSLO, conned over the Gaza withdrawal, conned by Churchill over Jordan, conned by the UN in 1948.

 

But on this score the US Government would not have been able to con the Jews if it had not been for the Jewish leadership in Israel.

 

The Likud leadership knew exactly what Sharon was doing in 2005 and yet the Likud leaders refused to act against Sharon. There was lots of time and the very first thing the Likud leaders should have done was expel the TRAITOR.  (To add to my argument who emerged as the greatest traitors of the Jews during the Gaza removal? It was the rabbis and the Settlers leaders!)

 

While all this was going on Netanyahu was there but he basically was lying low, and he only put up a bit of a show at the very end, when it was too late, and moreover he knew it was too late. How do you characterise this kind of behaviour, naïve!!! No traitors to the Jews. All human activity is conscious.

SO WHY DID BELMAN CALL NETANYAHU NAIVE?

 

SHERMAN ALSO THINKS THEY ARE “NAIVE”

SHERMAN HAS ILLUSIONS IN ISRAEL POLITICIANS

Note that these are what is called the right

1. Netanyahu made his name as a right politician
2. Likud to a man and woman is opposed to socialism

Now since this is about Martin Sherman what about him? Well Sherman looks at the situation in Israel and does 2 things

 

1. Sherman like Belman thinks that the Likud and Right are also naive
2. While he sees the right as naive only Sherman then confuses the issue totally by referring to what he calls the “left” thus echoing the confusers supreme on this score Geller and Spencer.

Those therefore are two big problems about Sherman.

BUT SHERMAN IS BETTER THAN THE TOTAL CONFUSIONIST CAROLINE GLICK

In his article Sherman makes this reference to Glick:

Regrettably, however, most of these are poorly thought through, and even if implemented, would leave Israel, as the nation-state of the Jewish people, in a situation hardly less beleaguered – diplomatically, politically and physically – than if it adopted the perilous prescription of the Left.

Typically, these alternative proposals fall into three broad categories. (a) Those that would leave Israel with a massive enfranchised Muslim minority (up to 40%) within its frontiers, critically undermining the ability to maintain the dominant Jewish character of the state, whatever the initial electoral arithmetic; (b) those that would leave Israel with excessively long and torturous frontiers, impossible to delineate (other than on a map) and to secure; and (c) those that entail both (a) and (b).

Most of these alternative proposals draw on optimistic (but not necessarily unrealistic) demographic assumptions as to the growth of the Arab population, but pay little heed to the negative effect the proposals might have on the Jewish population, were they to be implemented.

Lamentably, by insisting on blatantly flawed and clearly counter-productive political paradigms as proffered alternatives to the Left’s prescription of appeasement and accommodation, the authors of these proposals and their supporters only bolster the false perception that the latter is the only game in town

In the above Sherman is attacking Caroline Glick. You would hardly know but he is.

That is the good thing about Sherman…he is clear that the Glick proposals are the proposals of somebody who is betraying the Jews. Yes to leave 40 per cent of Muslims inside her Israel, that is a Glick betrayal right there and Sherman calls her on this betrayal.

At least Sherman is clear on the betrayal of Glick.

But there is no way forward at all with Sherman. Jews need a new leadership.

THE LESSON OF THE EILAT HIGHWAY MURDERS OF JEWS…THE MORE JEWS GET KICKED IN THE THROAT THE MORE JEWISH LEADERS TRUST THE KICKER

 

 

Hey Glick, that’s Begin grinning from ear to ear

THIS IS THE ROOT OF THE PROBLEM. BEGIN HAD BEEN A FREEDOM FIGHTER FOR THE JEWS AND ISRAEL BUT HIS PERSPECTIVE WAS NOT THAT OF TROTSKYISM, RATHER OF CREATING A BOURGEOIS ISRAEL (which is fine and dandy) WHICH COULD MAKE PEACE WITH ANTISEMITISM

 

IT INVOLVED THE BETRAYAL OF THE SINAI AND THE SELL OUT OF THE SINAI TO THE ENEMY OF JEWS AND ISRAEL

THIS IS NOW COMING HOME TO HAUNT ISRAEL. THE GREAT FREEDOM FIGHTER BEGIN IS FROM HIS GRAVE STICKING THE DAGGER INTO JEWS TODAY

 

In return for “peace” with Egypt Begin sold out the Israeli state.

But Begin was no ordinary Israeli or Jew. Begin was the man who led the struggle against the British Antisemites in the Mandate and who was hounded by the British Antisemites and would have been killed on the spot by the British antisemites of the Mandate.

 

But his action in handing over the Sinai to the enemy (shown in picture above) has come back to haunt Israel because another who claims to be Jewish (NETANYAHU) IS CARRYING OUT THE BETRAYAL EVEN FURTHER

 

This is the real meaning of Barak blathering about tactics and strategy. Netanyahu and Barak would not understand a strategy if it hit them up the gob! I am referring to this treacherous Jewish pair allowing Egypt to build up troops in Sinai.

 

We should reflect today: What happened to Begin that he set in train such a betrayal?

It is the old story, a bourgeois nationalist who becomes disorientated, and in that disorientation sells out.

Put it another way: His theoretical base to start with was not Trotskyism. Once then he was revolutionary and progressive but the lack of a theoretical revolutionary base meant that there came a point when he sold out the struggle.

 

This is why today Jewish politics is an absolute cauldron

 

Why the Jewish Israeli system is in such crisis? Answer because it was their hero, on the same level as Jabotinsky, that is Begin, who carried out the great betrayal with Sadat and Carter, a betrayal  which has come back to HAUNT Israel today

 

THAT IS WHY EVERYTHING THAT EVERYBODY CONNECTED WITH ISRAEL AND THE JEWS SAYS OR WRITES HAS GOT TO BE PLACED UNDER THE MICROSCOPE. THE MICROSCOPE IS THE MICROSCOPE OF REASON, AND IS CARRIED ON BY MARXISM, NOT STALINISM, BUT AS IN A METHOD OF STRUGGLE AS IS CONTAINED IN THE HERITAGE OF TROTSKYISM

 

I mean every EVERY body, without any exceptions. The day when you belong to a tribe or a club is over. What I say as a non Jew and as an Irish man in this context has got the same relevance as the most Jewish of Jews, the most prayerful of Jews etc. etc.

 

Let us take that jewel of Jewishness, Caroline Glick

 

After the raid by Fascists last week on the Eilat Highway Glick wrote this paragraph

 

“It is to be hoped that Thursday’s sophisticated, deadly, multi-pronged, combined arms assault by as yet unidentified enemy forces along the border with Egypt will suffice to force the IDF to alter its view of Egypt”

 

I count this as political gibberish on a whole number of levels and I as a non Jew, Trotskyist, would drop dead rather than write the above hogwash.

 

For starters…As a trotskyist I am programmed not to write ever “It is to be hoped” anything

 

In politics hope has got nothing to do with anythjing.  You can hope all you like but it won’t change a dammed thing.

 

Consider this though:

 

1. Begin betrayed the Jews

2. Begin was the authentic Jew, the authentic Zionist, the Zionist of Zionists

3. And that betrayal is threatening Israel as never before today.

 

 

So why “is it to be hoped!!!” If Glick had made a sober assessment of the Jewish leadership since 1948 and today then the only conclusion that she would have reached was that the next betrayal by Jewish leadership was just round the corner

 

Nothing at all has changed since Begin. Begin relied on the US Imperialists AND on the Arab antisemites of Egypt to bring security to Jews and Israel. So he handed across the Sinai to Egypt.

 

What happened last week with the lives of many Jews lost was the pay off for that betrayal, a betrayal taking the form of trust in the enemy

 

And what was the reaction of the Jewish leaders in Israel today. The answer was totally predictable: IT WAS TO TRUST THAT ENEMY EVEN MORE.

 

In other words the more that Jews get kicked in the throat the more that the Jewish leaders trust the kicker.

 

And that is why Caroline Glick starts her paragraph with the words “It is to be hoped”!!!

 

It is interesting that Glick spends most of her time attacking the Israeli “Left”. Well just how dammed cosy that is! Glick knows pretty dammed well that Haaretz is left of centre in the way that the thugs of Joseph Stalin were left of centre when they went around in the Spanish Revolution and Civil War murdering all of the revolutionaries. Glick knows that. they all know that. But it suits them to label the problem as being the “left”

 

But Glick I got some news for you.

 

THE PROBLEM WAS ACTUALLY BEGIN, THE MOST ZIONISTIST ZIONIST OF ALL TIME!!!

 

(In November of 1977, Egyptian President Anwar Sadat made his historical visit to Israel, igniting the peace process between Israel and Egypt. In 1978, in Camp David, Israel and Egypt signed a peace treaty – the first between Israel and any Arab state. Both Begin and Sadat were awarded the 1978 Nobel Peace Prize for their work)