TIME WILL TELL…THE PERFORMANCE OF NETANYAHU WAS A DISASTER FOR ISRAEL AND WILL END UP WITH A MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD AL QAIDA STATE ON ISRAEL’S BORDERS

Netanyahu addressed Congress yesterday and got over 50 standing ovations, but he forgot one thing: This was the leadership of American Imperialism that he was addressing and the key sentence in the speech of Netanyahu was when he referred to the coming to power of The Muslim Brotherhood in all countries, thanks to both the Democrats AND Republicans. In other words two sets of people, very important peoples, AMERICANS AND ISRAELIS, are being led into the jaws of death by these leaders, Netanyahu and the Israeli elite, the Democrats under Obama and Clinton, and the Republicans who, and this is the key issue, are fundamentally no different.

That key sentence from Netanyahu:

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu spoke of ”about the great convulsion taking place in the Middle East” in his opening remarks and said that the “ground is still shifting” and that the uprisings in the Muslim countries represent people’s demands for liberty — but like 1979 Iran, the outcomes were in question.

This is the Big Lie that is peddled and that Netanyahu in his speech to Congress joined in with.

The Uprisings in the Middle East are not about democracy, but liberty, and here we mean the liberty to have ONE ELECTION ONE TIME

 

This is the peculiar form of Liberty that the Muslim Brotherhood is seeking in every one of these countries.

IN HIS SPEECH TO CONGRESS NETANYAHU UTTERED NOT ONE WORD ABOUT LIBYA WHICH IS PRESENTLYH BEING BOMBED NIGHTLY BY NATO. THIS REPRESENTS THE TOTAL BETRAYAL OF THE JEWS BY THIS LEADER (FAUX  LEADER)

Not a word from Netanyahu about Libya where NATO, the worst enemies of the Jews in Obama and the EU (Cameron and SARKOZY), HAS NOW BEEN BOMBING TRIPOLI HEAVILY IN THE LAST 2 NIGHTS
In fact Netanyahu making a big deal out of Israel being loyal to the US made it very clear where he stands. he stands with NATO, always with NATO. Has he been bought earlier in life.

This “prophet” Netanyahu leads the Jews into the jaws of death and I can smell the flesh burning from here.

When Netanyahu speaks this is not the proud Jewish people who returned from Babylon equipped with their Bible and capable national self consciousness. He is projecting Jews and Israel as being the dhimmis of America

Meanwhile the ONLY strategy which American Jewish groups can produce is to pin everything on the replacement of Obama by a Republican. But that does not break the “dhimmi of America” mentality.

There is NO middle road here and the main problem is that Israel does not have a human being who can articulate the need.

This is to

1. Bring the San Remo Conference of 1920 into play in all discussions

2. Bring into play also the criminality of Britain and Churchill and direct this specially to Cameron that Britain robbed the Jews in the following months (leading to the Cairo Conference of 1920) of 80 per cent of their promised Homeland

3. That these “Palestinians” are a fake, the product of the machinations of Britain and America, and of their promotion of Holocaust organizer Hajj Amin el Husseini. Not only “Palestinians” but “Palestinian Arabs” is a rubbish term.

THE RACISM INHERENT IN THIS US AND EU CONSCIOUSNESS WHICH NETANYAHU ASKS JEWS TO JOIN WITH

The danger is not at all just Obama. The danger is this American and EU consciousness, where they look on Libya and could care less about past and solemn agreements, such as that made by George W. Bush with Muammar Gadhafi. An agreement with Gadhafi what nonsence we are the great Americans!

And the big danger is these “republicans” who see the agreement with Gadhafi made by Bush as being just an agreement with a “native”, of no real consequence.

TO THEM NETANYAHU IS A HERO BUT NETANYAHU IS PREPARING TO SURRENDER BYU FORCE JEWISH HISTORICAL LAND WHICH IS RIGHTFULLY THEIRS

And at this moment in time as far as these same people are concerned Netanyahu can do no wrong

The only problem with this is that the Democrats AND republicans have wrought havoc in the Middle East. Mubarak who is threatened now with execution BY THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, AND NOW LIBYA AND GADHAFI, PROVES THAT THEY CANNOT BE TRUSTED FOR A SECOND

How Mubarak must now rue trusting America. How Gadhafi must regret not acquiring those Nuclear arms.

But Israel is treading the same path.
EVERYTHING about Netanyahu to me stinks.

WHAT CAROLINE GLICK SAYS ON THIS AND WHERE THAT LEAVES US

The main point that Glick makes is that Obama created a diversion. She is certainly right.

By far the biggest event and issue centres on Hamas specifically and on the agreement which Abbas has made with Hamas. The differences between the two remain, it is purely opportunistic and episodic…remember that, it is most important.

The great Netanyahu policy rests on from (the pupils of Nazi Hajj Amin el Husseini) Hamas and Fatah, a mere form of words, and hey presto Muslim Brotherhood sit on the flank of Israel equipped with an army paid for and trained by American and EU antisemitism.

America under both Republican and Democratic Governments have built up the army of Abbas and that is going to be taken over, post September election, by the Hamas. The Muslim Brotherhood proceeds apace in every country thanks due to US Imperialism. The alliance as crisis engulfs capitalism is certainly formal though hidden and strategic.

Hamas is based upon the Protocols of Zion and is pure antisemitism. So that is what the Obama policy has achieved and which is largely hidden by the Republicans, because they in Bush and Rice were responsible initially for just that policy. Before that Clinton, Carter, Bush Snr. and Reagan…you see it is an unbroken seam.

Glick is right. Obama created a diversion from this reality, the 49 Armistice Borders, which he calls the 67 Borders, another Big Lie right there!

By cheering Netanyahu’s speechifying to the rafters Jewish blogs in America play into this deception.

The relevant Caroline Glick paragraphs are here:

Obama had two options for contending with the Palestinian unity deal. He could pay attention to it or he could create a distraction in order to ignore it. If he paid attention to it, he would have been forced to disavow his policy of blaming his predecessors in the White House and Israel for the absence of peace. By creating a distraction he would be able to change the subject in a manner that would enable him to maintain those policies.

 

And so he picked a fight with Netanyahu. And by picking the fight, he created a distraction that has, in fact, changed the subject and enabled Obama to maintain his policies that have been wholly repudiated by the reality of the Palestinian unity deal.

 

By inserting the citation of the 1949 armistice lines into his speech, Obama made Israel’s size again the issue.

 

The Hamas-Fatah unity deal actually demonstrates that not only is Israel’s size not the cause of the conflict, it is the main reason that Israelis and Palestinians live in relative peace.

 

Israel’s control over Judea and Samaria and east Jerusalem, and with them, its ability to ward off invasion and attacks on its major cities is what has prevented wars. If Israel were more vulnerable, the de facto Palestinian terror state would not be weighing whether or not to begin a new terror war as its leaders from Fatah and Hamas are doing today. It would be waging a continuous campaign of terror whose clear aim is Israel’s destruction for again, as Netanyahu said the 1949 armistice lines make war an attractive option for Israel’s enemies.

 

BY PICKING a fight with Netanyahu, since Thursday, no one could have possibly noted this basic truth because the false issue of Israel’s control over these areas – that is, Israel’s size – has dominated the global discourse on the Middle East.

 

http://www.carolineglick.com/e/2011/05/obamas-diversionary-tactics.php#comments

 

After that Glick makes other useful points, but after making these vital remarks, shows the limitations of present bourgeois Jewish leadership in ending like this:

 

 

Netanyahu deserves a lot of credit for standing up to Obama on Friday. He showed enormous courage in doing so. It was his finest hour to date and polls over the weekend show that the public appreciates and supports him for it. He must build on that success by putting the focus on the truth.

 

It was NOT a success.

 

Netanyahu missed the essence which is that Obama speaks to a very specific audience, and since he is out of the Khalidi cum Edward Said school it is the audience of American and European antisemitism.

 

Israel expansionist? You must be jokkng! israel is less than the size of Munster which is about one quarter of tiny Ireland, a mere province for goodness sake.

 

That is what Obama and the antisemites want to attack and to reduce further. How hard is it to make that case against THAT!

 

Netanyahu did not stand up to Obama at all. That is a mirage. He seemed to but that is only to very stupid people.

 

As Yamit82 on Israpundit has pointed out in opposition to editor Ted belman that will still mean stripping 100,000 Jews from their home in Judea.

 

As we have often stated Jewish leadership is in a gigantic crisis and this will only be resolved through the quest for new leadership.

 

Our sister website www.wedefendisrael.com is pioneering a series of articles on history which incorporates many lessons and will be a focus of important lessons being learned

 

The way forward can be found but it will not be found easily.

 

4INTERNATIONAL DEFENDS PAMELA GELLER AGAINST THE INDEPENDENT SCURRILOUS ATTACK AND ALSO AGAINST THIS POLITICAL CREEP CHARLES JOHNSON

IT IS VITAL THAT A UNITED FRONT IS CREATED TO DEFEND THE STRUGGLE AGAINST DICTATORSHIP IN EUROPE AND AMERICA, WHICH ITSELF IS CONNECTED TO THE DEFENCE OF ISRAEL, AND THE EXPOSURE OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ANTISEMITISM BEING BEBIND THE SO CALLED “ARAB SPRING”

BUT THERE ARE ENEMIES TO THIS UNITED FRONT, ONE OF WHICH IS THE BLOG PAJAMAS MEDIA AS PRODUCED BY CHARLES JOHNSON. (more later)

Pamela Geller has come under a vicious attack from the London paper, The Independent. This is the paper close to Harry’s place, close to Oliver Kamm who now writes for the Times.

In fact The Independent expresses the very worst of British hypocricy and reaction on the world stage.

It was The Independent which led in the lies against the Serbs in former Yugoslavia. So Geller is in good company (with the Serbs!)

Johnson

This revealing comment appeared after the Independent attack on Geller by Johnson. It was a comment out of the blue on Libya which followed the slander against Geller by Charles Johnson. It seems out of the blue but is actually very revealing indeed!

This person wrote:

I might start doing page for Libya Updates soon, Explanation of what’s happened that day in the evening.

However, further good news. The rebels are about to enter Zliten for the next battle. And shelling of Misrata has stopped, so all sorts of supplies and shenanigans and enter the city.

 

“Further good news”, this man says. The Libyan “Rebels” are in reality The Muslim Brotherhood and the opposition to Muammar Gadhafi is in reality The Muslim Brotherhood

This man on Johnson’s blog Pajamas Media (unopposed)  is lining up with The Muslim Brotherhood and against Muammar Gadhafi.

Now it so happens that Obama, the Democrats, and a goodly section of the Republicans in America are also trying to create a new virtual reality, Muslim Brotherhood good, Salafists bad.

Except that this falls apart when one remembers Muslim Brotherhood IS Salafism!

Remember also that in this Obama speak world of lies this all leads to the acceptance of Hamas as a “moderate” party and therefore the acceptance by Israel of a Hamas dominated “Palestinian” Arab State on the flank of Israel.

Would that state be peaceful? Apparently so, to follow this twisted logic being promoted, promoted by Obama and the EU Establishment, also it seems by Charles Johnson.

The appearance is an attack on Geller. The essence though, which lies within and hiding behind that appearance, is that Israel must accept a Hamas dominated Sharia state on its own land, which is Judea and Samaria, but at any rate directly on its new border.

Let us take the scurrilous attack on Geller before we do the Independent. This is what Johnson wrote:

The Independent’s Robert Chalmers has a very balanced and fair look at Pamela Geller: American patriot or extremist firebrand?

And of course, any balanced and fair examination of the Shrieking Harpy can only come to one conclusion: she’s desperately unhinged.

What’s striking about this article, though, is that Geller completely lacks the courage of her convictions. When confronted about her bizarre, hate-filled posts, she invariably attempts to pretend she didn’t really say what she did really say. It’s a “joke,” or it’s somebody else’s writing that she just happened to put on her blog for no particular reason, or it’s “taken out of context.” Like many extremists and bigots, underneath the bluster and the hateful statements Geller is a coward.

For example:

Among the many new things I have learnt from the work of Pamela Geller is that President Obama reputedly used to knock around with a crack whore.

“That,” the author, blogger and broadcaster insists, “is not what I said. You are taking this out of context. The post [on her website atlasshrugs.com] was pointing out how people were reporting lie after lie about Sarah Palin. I said to myself, there is so much about Obama we don’t print. In his youth,” she continues, repeating a story for which there exists absolutely no foundation, “he supposedly liked a girl who was a crack whore. I never reported it as fact. They say all these vile things about Palin but do we ever talk about Obama and the crack whore?”

The incredibly libellous post, entitled: “IT’S TIME TO EXPOSE THE TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA” appeared on 1 August 2009. “Why not tell the truth about Obama and his reported strange sexual predilections?” Geller wrote. “It is well known that he allegedly was involved with a crack whore in his youth. Very seedy stuff … Find the ho, give her a show! Obama allegedly trafficked in some very deviant practices.”

Pretty hard to take that out of context, wouldn’t you say?

Then Johnson adds:

Chalmers emailed me to ask for my reaction to Geller’s insults:

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/38569/comments/#cc9067095

I would not wish to pursue Johnson’s smell any further because it is not a pleasant smell to follow.

Except to point to that  last reference (to the email made by The Independent to Johnson) that they do flock together with a sure instinct.

On the Geller blog  Atlas Shrugs I took up this reference made by The Independent above:

“the incredibly libellous blog”

as being the pivotal comment by The Independent.

 

I highlight this off the cuff remark by The Independent because it points to where the centre of this struggle really must be concentrated, it must focus on defence of the First Amendment

This is not to suggest that struggles in Israel or in Europe in defence of basic rights should not be fought, but to say that the focus has to be the defence in America of the First Amendment

And that is why this spokesperson for Obama, Johnson, and why this mouthpiece of British Imperialism, The Independent, attack Pamela Geller

Thus you will find my comment in defence of Pamela Geller on the Atlas Shrugs site this morning:

 
I defend Pamela Geller against this abomination who calls himself a journalist.

But the issue is wider even than this attack.

What is called in historical socialist circles as the United Front

As opposed to the present Fascist “Left” hatred of Pamela Geller and many others.

I take these attacks on Pamela very seriously and they are a major danger to free speech to all

Geller is leading the fight against Obama, but in essence this is leading the fight against dictatorship, which is taking a number of forms, one but only one of which is the Sharia issue

Remember the Independent led in the destruction of Yugoslavia and the hounding of its President Slobodan Milosevic, who was it must be remembered and emphasised poisoned by the NATO in his NATO jail

The most serious charge by this Independent writer was that the article by Pamela was incredibly “libellous”.

This writer is actually correct on that. If Pamela was writing in any country in Europe, any at all, it would be libellous.

Only because there exists the First Amendment is that article not libellous in America.

This points to the best way forward which centres on the defence of the First Amendment in America, where this battle now should concentrate.

I call for a United Front to defend Geller from The Independent, and to defend Spencer from threats of physical attacks, to defend Geert Wilders etc.

I represent true socialism and there is another history to this socialist movement that not everybody is aware of.

 

may 16 2.56 am (american time)

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/05/cover-story-independent-sunday-magazine-.html#comment-6a00d8341c60bf53ef01538e8329b3970b

I wrote>