US AND EU IMPERIALISM IS ALREADY AT WAR AGAINST RUSSIA…DRONE BROUGHT DOWN YESTERDAY

The issue of Ukraine is really very simple.

The power of US and EU Imperialism with its powerful Media claim they stand for Ukrainian Independence. But the US and EU are using their power not to créate an independent Ukraine at all, but a Ukraine which will be used as a Communist Hating base from which to attack Russia by means of Thermo Nuclear weapons

This is a very old problem indeed. We stand for national Independence. But in a world dominated by blood thirsty US and EU Imperialism what if this National Independence is clearly a base for war against Communism.

Against Communism? Yes!

Putin is no Communist, that is true. But Russia was the country in which the working class took state power, in 1917, in the FIRST successful worker´s revolution.

In these conditions…yes Ukraine must have its Independence, but a true Independence, and not an “Independence” which has it as the base for Nuclear Weapons pointing across at the border with Russia.

(By the way Crimea is Russia and the action of Kruschev in giving away Crimea in 1952 was an ilegal action by a Stalinist who was not a Russian patriotic person)

Putin is a Smart person and is a good and a brave reader of reality.

The reality is that the US and EU are already at war with Russia. (By the way the Jews of Israel should realise here that Obama and Kerry are also already at war, behind the Palestinian Muslim Jihadists, with the state of Israel.

War is inevitable.

It is already happening. Yesterday a drone based in Bavaria was sent across Crimea by US and EU Imperialism. This drone was very high, certainly out of sight from the ground, and thus was in a position to spy deeply inside Russia itself.

Putin being a brave patriot of Russia ordered that this drone be brought down. Scientific Russia did so quite easily and is now in the possession of Russia…expect more on this

The US Imperialists control the Media and will seek to turn this justified defence on its head. The aggressor here is of course the US and EU Imperialists.

Meanwhile the Jewish leadership of Israel is going behind the US and EU Imperialists, and are such slaves of Imperialism, they are such cowards and snuggle up behind US Imperialism in everything, THUS BETRAYING THE JEWISH STRUGGLE FOR NATIONAL LIBERATION AGAINST ARAB JIHADISM.

This is a very serious matter indeed for Jews.

Jews should be seeking an Alliance with Putin because Jews and Russians here are facing the same enemy

Will Jews do this? No! Answer is no they will not.

For that to happen the Jews need a new leadership

WHAT TO DO

It is necessary to build http://www.4international.me in all the world because the crisis of capitalism drives Imperialism to War on all fronts. Only socialist revolution can lead the world out of barbarity caused by capitalism.

BREITBART REPRESENTS THE MOST PROGRESSIVE FORCE IN AMERICA

No doubt about it, the place to be if you want to understand where the American people and the American working class are going, is on www.breitbart.com

Obama is at the centre of all of these moves against the American people and the American workers because Obama has got no respect for the great American Revolution and the great American Constitution, the great American tradion of Free Speech.

Obama is in no way of the left, not a socialist, is a raging Imperialist, but his politics chime with a disgustingly disorientated Stalinist left.

The new Fascism in the world is going to come partly out of these circles. And it will be laced with antisemitism as is seen in a recent use of an antisemitic cartoon by a section of the anti Wall Street movement.

As the world capitalist system hurls into economic crisis so the need to turn to Fascism. So the need to do away with democratic rights as contained in the American traditions.

It must be emphasised that Obama does not represent the black workers of America. He does the precise opposite. Because black workers like white workers, and even polka dot workers, need ALL their rights in order to defend themselves against dictatorship.

Obama represents the dictatorship of capital.

This story about this woman called Kagan shows how Obama had her appointed to the Supreme Court in order to do away with these basic rights of the American people and the American working class. The contempt which Obama and Kagan on the Supreme Court have for these traditional basic democratic righnts is exposed by Breitbart’s writer.

Starts here:

Breitbart News has discovered previously unknown handwritten notes from Elena Kagan to radical professor Derrick Bell, sent to Bell as Kagan worked on his seminal 1985 article on Critical Race Theory in the Harvard Law Review (99 Harv. L. Rev. 4).

The notes, which were not among materials presented to the Senate during Justice Kagan’s confirmation hearings, are preserved among Bell’s papers at the New York University archives.

Kagan’s work on Bell’s article was revealed in 2010 by Harvard Law School professor Charles Ogletree, after President Barack Obama nominated her to the Supreme Court. Ogletree cited her “phenomenal edits” on Bell’s “classic” article. 

Bell’s article, “The Civil Rights Chronicles,” combined exposition and fiction to argue that the Constitution was–and remains–tainted by white supremacy, and that the United States awaited “a common crisis that will overcome racism” through radical constitutional reform.

Unlike then-Harvard Law Review president Carol Steiker, who corresponded with Bell via typed letter (apparently on a 1980s-vintage dot matrix printer), Kagan chose to write to Bell exclusively on yellow notepad paper. She did not explain her choice to write by hand, save to suggest in one note on Aug. 30, 1985 that she was pressed for time.

Most of Kagan’s notes to Bell concern minor editorial comments on the “Chronicles,” as she and the other editors prepared his article for publication. One interesting passage concerns a legal question that Kagan and Steiker posed about Bell’s attempt to argue for a new constitutional right–a “substantive due process right” to “racial healing”:

As Carol and I told you on the phone, we’re a little bit concerned at the focus on this part of the piece. The doctrinal section centers on the idea of creating a substantive due process right to racial healing. But the reader is left wondering: why wouldn’t the Court strike these laws down on first amendment grounds? It strikes me that the Court would indeed strike these laws down on the ground of free speech or free association.

The section of the article to which Kagan was referring was entitled “The Chronicle of the Slave Scrolls.” In it, the main character, Geneva Crenshaw (who would recur in many of Bell’s writings) tells a fable about finding parchment scrolls on the west coast of Africa inside a model of a slave ship. 

The scrolls “simply taught the readily available but seldom read history of slavery in America” as related by those who had lived through it. Crenshaw relates that the discovery of the scrolls inspired black Americans to meet in “healing groups” that inspired them to compete more fiercely for achievement and respect–until a “television minister” warned that the scrolls were inciting racial hatred by teaching about old evils. States then passed “Racial Toleration Laws” that prohibited any teaching about the history of racial conflict, and blacks eventually acquiesced.

The lesson, Crenshaw says, is that “[t]he Constitution protects the efforts of black people only when those efforts leave vested interests undistured [sic].” 

Bell, through the narrator, provides the solution in the form of “a substantive due process right that barred government interference with the racial healing sessions,” based on the same

 right to privacy recognized in Roe v. Wade as part of a “penumbra” of constitutional protections. Bell’s narrator says a right to “racial healing” would give special protection to the idea that “the racism of whites rather than the deficiencies of blacks causes our lowly position in this society.” 

Crenshaw–perhaps echoing Kagan’s note–is skeptical that the Court would grant such a right. Bell’s answer is “skillful lawyering” and “a more liberal Court”; Crenshaw later replies that only a “common crisis” will bring the needed change.

As Solicitor General, Kagan cheered when Obama seized a national “crisis” to pass unrelated legislation whose goal is to create an effective right to health care. She has not recused herself from the subsequent Obamacare case, as she has from today’s suit over Arizona’s immigration law, in which her “skillful lawyering” played an important role.

If Obama is re-elected, Kagan could be part of the “more liberal court” Bell envisioned–and great changes in constitutional jurisprudence could be the result.

THE LESSON OF THE EILAT HIGHWAY MURDERS OF JEWS…THE MORE JEWS GET KICKED IN THE THROAT THE MORE JEWISH LEADERS TRUST THE KICKER

 

 

Hey Glick, that’s Begin grinning from ear to ear

THIS IS THE ROOT OF THE PROBLEM. BEGIN HAD BEEN A FREEDOM FIGHTER FOR THE JEWS AND ISRAEL BUT HIS PERSPECTIVE WAS NOT THAT OF TROTSKYISM, RATHER OF CREATING A BOURGEOIS ISRAEL (which is fine and dandy) WHICH COULD MAKE PEACE WITH ANTISEMITISM

 

IT INVOLVED THE BETRAYAL OF THE SINAI AND THE SELL OUT OF THE SINAI TO THE ENEMY OF JEWS AND ISRAEL

THIS IS NOW COMING HOME TO HAUNT ISRAEL. THE GREAT FREEDOM FIGHTER BEGIN IS FROM HIS GRAVE STICKING THE DAGGER INTO JEWS TODAY

 

In return for “peace” with Egypt Begin sold out the Israeli state.

But Begin was no ordinary Israeli or Jew. Begin was the man who led the struggle against the British Antisemites in the Mandate and who was hounded by the British Antisemites and would have been killed on the spot by the British antisemites of the Mandate.

 

But his action in handing over the Sinai to the enemy (shown in picture above) has come back to haunt Israel because another who claims to be Jewish (NETANYAHU) IS CARRYING OUT THE BETRAYAL EVEN FURTHER

 

This is the real meaning of Barak blathering about tactics and strategy. Netanyahu and Barak would not understand a strategy if it hit them up the gob! I am referring to this treacherous Jewish pair allowing Egypt to build up troops in Sinai.

 

We should reflect today: What happened to Begin that he set in train such a betrayal?

It is the old story, a bourgeois nationalist who becomes disorientated, and in that disorientation sells out.

Put it another way: His theoretical base to start with was not Trotskyism. Once then he was revolutionary and progressive but the lack of a theoretical revolutionary base meant that there came a point when he sold out the struggle.

 

This is why today Jewish politics is an absolute cauldron

 

Why the Jewish Israeli system is in such crisis? Answer because it was their hero, on the same level as Jabotinsky, that is Begin, who carried out the great betrayal with Sadat and Carter, a betrayal  which has come back to HAUNT Israel today

 

THAT IS WHY EVERYTHING THAT EVERYBODY CONNECTED WITH ISRAEL AND THE JEWS SAYS OR WRITES HAS GOT TO BE PLACED UNDER THE MICROSCOPE. THE MICROSCOPE IS THE MICROSCOPE OF REASON, AND IS CARRIED ON BY MARXISM, NOT STALINISM, BUT AS IN A METHOD OF STRUGGLE AS IS CONTAINED IN THE HERITAGE OF TROTSKYISM

 

I mean every EVERY body, without any exceptions. The day when you belong to a tribe or a club is over. What I say as a non Jew and as an Irish man in this context has got the same relevance as the most Jewish of Jews, the most prayerful of Jews etc. etc.

 

Let us take that jewel of Jewishness, Caroline Glick

 

After the raid by Fascists last week on the Eilat Highway Glick wrote this paragraph

 

“It is to be hoped that Thursday’s sophisticated, deadly, multi-pronged, combined arms assault by as yet unidentified enemy forces along the border with Egypt will suffice to force the IDF to alter its view of Egypt”

 

I count this as political gibberish on a whole number of levels and I as a non Jew, Trotskyist, would drop dead rather than write the above hogwash.

 

For starters…As a trotskyist I am programmed not to write ever “It is to be hoped” anything

 

In politics hope has got nothing to do with anythjing.  You can hope all you like but it won’t change a dammed thing.

 

Consider this though:

 

1. Begin betrayed the Jews

2. Begin was the authentic Jew, the authentic Zionist, the Zionist of Zionists

3. And that betrayal is threatening Israel as never before today.

 

 

So why “is it to be hoped!!!” If Glick had made a sober assessment of the Jewish leadership since 1948 and today then the only conclusion that she would have reached was that the next betrayal by Jewish leadership was just round the corner

 

Nothing at all has changed since Begin. Begin relied on the US Imperialists AND on the Arab antisemites of Egypt to bring security to Jews and Israel. So he handed across the Sinai to Egypt.

 

What happened last week with the lives of many Jews lost was the pay off for that betrayal, a betrayal taking the form of trust in the enemy

 

And what was the reaction of the Jewish leaders in Israel today. The answer was totally predictable: IT WAS TO TRUST THAT ENEMY EVEN MORE.

 

In other words the more that Jews get kicked in the throat the more that the Jewish leaders trust the kicker.

 

And that is why Caroline Glick starts her paragraph with the words “It is to be hoped”!!!

 

It is interesting that Glick spends most of her time attacking the Israeli “Left”. Well just how dammed cosy that is! Glick knows pretty dammed well that Haaretz is left of centre in the way that the thugs of Joseph Stalin were left of centre when they went around in the Spanish Revolution and Civil War murdering all of the revolutionaries. Glick knows that. they all know that. But it suits them to label the problem as being the “left”

 

But Glick I got some news for you.

 

THE PROBLEM WAS ACTUALLY BEGIN, THE MOST ZIONISTIST ZIONIST OF ALL TIME!!!

 

(In November of 1977, Egyptian President Anwar Sadat made his historical visit to Israel, igniting the peace process between Israel and Egypt. In 1978, in Camp David, Israel and Egypt signed a peace treaty – the first between Israel and any Arab state. Both Begin and Sadat were awarded the 1978 Nobel Peace Prize for their work) 

DEFEND RATKO MLADIC…HE IS A HERO TO ALL FIGHTERS AGAINST JIHAD AND IMPERIALISM

THE KEY GERMINAL CIVIKOV BOOK ON SREBRENICA AND ITS KEY SUPERGRASS WITNESS IS ON

http://www.scribd.com/doc/51220592/Germinal-Civikov-Srebrenica-Star-Witness

 

WE REPRINT HERE THE LATEST ARTICLE BY SRDJA TRIFKOVIC

AS ALWAYS THERE IS IMPORTANT MATERIAL HERE FROM TRIFKOVIC BUT…

 

I have major problems with the following article. To me it is too clever by half. It is not a campaigning article. Not really an article to campaign behind

I disagree strongly with this

Ratko Mladić is neither a monster nor a saint.

Mladic is no monster! the only monsters are those on the likes of Harry’s Place who call him that, and worse. So why say it anyway!

Rather than being a monster Mladic is indeed a hero, because he fought a valiant struggle, and is still fighting, just as much as is Geert Wilders, or as is Muammar Gadhafi, and those with Gadhafi in Libya who are fighting against NATO

Unlike this writer in this article we on 4international have no equivalence between these forces. At every point we take the side of those who are fighting against this alliance of NATO and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Yes indeed…take very strong exception to that phrase.

 

I make these points:

 

  1. The famous Dutch report specifically said that they could

find not one eye witness that the Serb soldiers on retaking Srebrenica murdered a single human being, much less Muslim

 

  1. He leaves out the key Germinal Civikov book in this article, although it is central in his previous article. It is right to make Civikov central. I will tell you why

 

Civikov proves that the whole of the Hague kangaroo Court evidence that the Serbs executed prisoners in any number was based on the “evidence” of Drazen Erdemovic.

 

Why is this fact so important?

 

It is so important because Erdemovic was a supergrass in the mould of Christopher Black of Derry.

 

Christopher Black was like an empty vessel in the hands of the RUC Special Branch. They the RUC Intelligence simply poured their evidence in one end of Christopher Black and it came out the other during the critical trials of republicans. It was a closed system. The supergrass was kept in high isolation, away even from his family. No other witnesses were needed, except the police (!!!) and in fact were not only not necessary, but would cause “cross contamination” of the evidence of the supergrass.

 

So in that case Erdemovic claimed that 1200 Muslims were executed thanks to the labours of himself and 7 others plus 2 higher up the command chain

 

What happened those 9 others, guilty of “the greatest crime since the Holocaust” as The Hague kangaroo Court told us.

 

These 9 others were to this day not even questioned although the key evidence of Erdemovic named them.

 

Not only were they very well known, absurdly so, but one of them was arrested in America on a driving charge, and the Americans made sure that they were not interested in him appearing in the Hague.

 

SO

 

There was no execution of any kind at any farm nohow nowhere!

 

Our position is WHY TAKE THE WORD OF A PAID LIAR?

 

There are other issues in this article concerning Tito.

 

It is not made clear, in fact the very opposite.

 

Tito was no communist, he was a Stalinist.

 

As far as I understood at the time when Stalin made the pact with Hitler, Tito whether he agreed or not, did not oppose it publicly. He was part of the Stalinist Comintern.

 

The writer of this article does not even distinguish between Stalinism and Communism

 

That is the swampland of American and British Imperialism and their ideology. Why should Serbs go down that track either?

 

Much in this article is minor and incidental.

 

We on 4international say that the ONLY important thing is not about bounties for families, but that Ratko Mladic like all other Serbs in this Kangaroo Court, many now languishing in prison, are all innocent in the court of revolutionary socialist or communist justice and must be immediately set free.

 

The only crime of Ratko Mladic was to fight on behalf of the Christian Serbs against the alliance of Jihad and Imperialism, especially American and British Imperialism

(start article by Srdja Trifkovic here)

General Mladic: The Facts

Jun 2, 2011

By Srdja Trifkovic | Mladic may have allowed himself to be discovered in return for a substantial financial reward for his family, sources from Belgrade say.

The circumstances surrounding arrest of the wartime commander of the Bosnian Serb Army, General Ratko Mladić, seem puzzling. On May 26 he was captured in the house of a close relative with the same surname in a village north of Belgrade. Prima facie this means either that Mladić was entirely left to his own devices and had to seek shelter with people certain to be under police surveillance, or else that the Serbian authorities had been conniving in his hiding. The former is unlikely in view of the effectiveness of Mladić’s concealment after he finally went underground in 2002. The latter is even less likely in view of President Boris Tadić’s constant desire to please his mentors in Brussels and Washington and get Serbia a step closer to the ever-elusive EU membership.

According to our reliable sources in Belgrade, Mladić would not have been discovered had he not decided to give himself up in return for a substantial financial reward for his family. He is a very sick man and unlikely to live much longer. In addition to a chronic kidney ailment and high blood pressure, he has suffered several minor strokes over the past decade. Two years ago he was treated—under an assumed name—for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma at a clinic in Belgrade. Aware that his wife Bosiljka and son Darko had been living in penury since the authorities stopped paying his pension in 2005, Mladić decided to offer the government a deal. The final settlement is well below the $10m previously offered for Mladić’s capture, but sufficient to enable his wife and son to live in comfort for many years to come.

The price Mladić will have to pay is to endure, in the closing months of his life, a show trial at The Hague, where his guilt for genocide, crimes against humanity etc. is treated as a long-established fact. That he will not be granted even pro forma assumption of innocence was evident in the statement by the viceroy of Bosnia (“International High Representative”), Valentin Inzko of Austria, who described Mladić as a “war criminal” even though the trial is unlikely to start until some time next year.

Ratko Mladić is neither a monster nor a saint. He is a soldier, groomed in the Titoist tradition of the JNA (YPA) trans-national Yugoslavism, who rediscovered his Serb roots in late middle age. He was a skilled tactician but he was not a master strategist: he knew how to win battles, but ending the war was beyond him. His masterly conquest of the fortified Muslim positions on Mts. Igman and Bjelašnica in the summer of 1993 was a neat case of deep penetration by platoon-sized shock units in the center, immediately followed by panic-inducing flanking pincers.

Mladić’s freedom of action was partly curtailed by the latent tensions between the military and the political leadership of the Bosnian Serb republic. He and his staff were former YPA officers mistrusted by the ruling Serbian Democratic Party. On the other hand, Mladić’s view was that the Serbian Democratic Party establishment was both corrupt and inept. Dr. Karadžić retaliated by referring to the Army top brass as “commie bastards,” komunjare. The underlying animosity was based on the politicians’ claim that the officers had divided loyalties, since many of them (including Mladić) were still on the payroll of the Yugoslav Army, which at that time was controlled by Slobodan Milošević.

Needless to say, Ratko Mladić is not guilty as charged. The heart of the indictment against him, “Srebrenica,” is a myth—a genocide-that-never was, a postmodernist exercise in pseudoreality. It is a matter of record that thousands of Muslim men were killed in the vicinity of that small town during the Bosnian war, and that most of them lost their lives during an attempted breakthrough after the pocket fell to the Bosnian Serb forces in July 1995. At least a fifth reached safety of the Muslim-held town of Tuzla; a few hundred crossed to Serbia, across the Drina River to the east. An unknown were killed while fighting their way through; and many others—numbers remain disputed—were taken prisoner and executed by the Bosnian Serb soldiers. The numbers remain unknown and misrepresented. The War Crimes Tribunal at The Hague (ICTY) never came up with a conclusive breakdown of casualties. That a war crime did take place is undeniable, but the number of its victims remains forensically and demographically unproven. According to the former BBC reporter Jonathan Rooper, “from the outset the numbers were used and abused” for political purposes.” The most startling aspect of the 7-8,000 figure, he says, is that it has always been represented as synonymous with the number of people executed.  This was never a possibility. (Check out my Srebrenica and the Power of Reason, April 15.)

Far from bringing the Srebrenica myth to some long-overdue critical scrutiny, Mladić’s transfer to The Hague will be used to reconfirm old prejudices and old myths. In reality, the crimes and violations of human rights between 1992 and 1995 were not the direct result of anyone’s nationalist project. These crimes, as Susan Woodward of Brookings notes, “were the results of the wars and their particular characteristics, not the causes.” Yet the effect of the legal intervention of the “international community” with its act of recognition of Bosnia-Herzegovina was that a Yugoslav loyalty was made to look like a conspiratorial disloyalty to “Bosnia.” In 1943-4 Tito was able to force the Anglo-Americans to pretend that his struggle was not communist revolution. In 1992-5 Alija Izetbegović forced the West to pretend that his jihad was the defense of “multi-ethnicity.” Both pretenses were absurd.

Ratko Mladić will be duly convicted of genocide and crimes against humanity. He will not come out of jail alive. The verdict is already written, but it reflects a fundamental imbalance. It ignores the essence of the Bosnian war—the Serbs’ striving not to be forced into secession—while remaining mute about the culpability of the other two sides for a series of unconstitutional, illegitimate and illegal political decisions that caused the war. The judgment against Mladić at the U.S.-sponsored and largely U.S.-funded tribunal at The Hague will be built on this flawed foundation. It will be neither fair nor just. It will also give further credence to the myth of Muslim blameless victimhood, Serb viciousness, and Western indifference, and therefore weaken our resolve in the global struggle that used to be known as “war on terrorism,” and now no longer has a name, or a purpose, or a strategy.

The long-term agenda of the Tribunal’s architects is obvious when we read Geoffrey Robertson’s “Mistakes the Mladic trial needs to avoid” (The Independent, May 28, 2011): “The Mladic indictment … should be replaced by just one charge, the crime against humanity constituted by his command responsibility for ordering the worst war crime since the Japanese death marches of POWs at the end of the Second World War, namely the slaughter of more than 7,000 prisoners of war—the Muslim men and boys killed at Srebrenica.” It remains the Serbian government’s duty, Robertson says,

to clean out the Serb orthodox church, whose priests blessed the death squads at Srebrenica. Without their blessing, I believe that some soldiers would have disobeyed their orders to shoot defenceless, hog-tied, men and boys. It is widely known that the church has harboured Hague fugitives in its monasteries and has been deeply implicit with the murderous aspects of Serb nationalism… They should remember … the fact that the wheels of international justice grind slowly but they grind exceedingly small.

This is a statement worthy of a senior jurist in Moscow, cca 1937. It is unimaginable that Mr. Robinson would suggest a similar clean-up of the Prophet’s Religion of Peace and Tolerance, of course. His call is based on the construct of primary Serb culpability that is supposedly unique among the warring factions. In Robertson’s scenario The Hague is not a vehicle of judicial reconciliation but an instrument of quasi-legal retaliation.

The forthcoming verdict against Ratko Mladić, signed and sealed as it is, will be based on a lie and on an arbitrary apportioning of guilt by the self-appointed guardians of the “international community.” It paves the way for a new, even worse conflict a decade or two from now. It guarantees that the absurdity known as “Bosnia-Herzegovina” will become even less tenable than it is already.

Tags:

 

AS WELL AS ABOVE SEE VERY GOOD ANALYSIS BY SRDJA TRIFKOVI WHERE HE DOES DEAL WITH CIVIKOV ON

http://serbianna.com/analysis/archives/901?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+SerbiannaAnalysis+%28Serbianna+Analysis%29

YAMIT82…NOBODY IS LAUGHING OUT LOUD

by Felix Quigley

Israpundit is a very important site for the Jewish people especially now that there has to be organized a great discussion on just how Israel can face up to its enemies.

The news which has emerged from a source within the talks going on between the Israeli ruling class of Livni and Olmert, with the Palestinian Arab fascists presided over by the US Imperialists of Bush, led in the talks by Rice, shows the enormous dangers which Israel and the lives of all Jews are in. This is why we on 4international are very critical of some of the discussions that are taking place there. The most recent issue is over the issue of apostasy and the general position of religion in the Jewish strugggle. Nobody really likes tackling this but it has to be tackled head on if we are to have the discussion necessary for the saving of Israel from its enemies. Continue reading

REPORT SHOWS GREAT DANGER TO ISRAEL…BUT ISRAPUNDIT BETRAYS

By Felix Quigley

Israel is now in the greatest danger that it has ever been in during all of its life. We on 4international have repeatedly emphasised that the way in which Yugoslavia was destroyed (wiped off the map) was through an alliance of American, British and German Imperialism which set up reactionary alliances with Fascist/Nazi entities within Yugoslavia. Those entities were the Fascists around Tudjman in Croatia, the Islamofascists in Bosnia around Izetbegovic, and the Thaci/Haradinaj Fascists and Stalinists of Kosovo. Weak on their own, nevertheless the role of US and NATO/EU Imperialism with all of its power, especially Military power linked to Media power, meant that the Serbs were isolated and defeated. Much of this went on behind the scenes, the public were not aware because the public always underestimates the role of conspiracy and secrecy in how the ruling Capitalist class works.

This is the great danger to the Jews today. Continue reading

THE RETURN OF FASCIST KILLER HARADINAJ

By Felix Quigley

On 4international we intend to follow this man. His name is Ramush Haradinaj, everybody knows he is a killer and has murdered in cold blood many ordinary Serb peasants and simple country folk, we on 4international have already proved that and have exposed the alliance of the US and EU Imperialists with this killer of Serbs, an alliance which goes to the very tops of the US Elite, to Bush, Lieberman, Cheney, Holbrooke and McCain. Continue reading