JEWS MUST HAVE TROTSKYIST LEADERSHIP TO FIGHT THIS WAR AGAINST A CRUEL JIHADIST “PALESTINIAN” ENEMY

This Young Serb beheaded by Jihadists supported by US in Bosnia…this is precisely what Jews face against “Palestinianism”

 

Israeli leaders under Netanyahu are now fighting a war on Gaza which is NOT a repeat of other wars because the international situation is totally different.

 

There is now the advance of International Jihad as is seen in the rise of ISIL and there is the brave struggle of el Sisi in Egypt against the Jihad of the Muslim Brotherhood under Morsi. The courage of el Sisi stands in contrast to the cowardice of Netanyahu and Israel who have refused to take action against Hamas and Fatah

 

While el Sisi has arrested the leaders of the Muslim Brothers in Egypt and passed death sentences against these fascists Netanyahu ahs delayed and delayed while the same Jihadist Fascists hammer Sderot with rockets.

 

This highlights one thing. The situation has changed totally since past wars against Arabs. In Israel today as in every country in the world without exception the struggles for freedom to live are all about leadership. This can only be resolved by creating Trotskyist leadership and the only party which can claim Trotskyist honour and heritage is www.4international.me. Cynics may scoff at this but we do not care all that matters is that scientific fact (truth) is on our side

 

4international will now make 10 points, followed by 3 “notes” on the abductions experiences

 

1. Clear out Hamas and Fatah. Like the Egyptian leaders around el Sisi place them on trial with the death sentence available
2. Consequent to that put an end to “Palestinian” nationalism
3. Provide a definitive survey of all the attacks made on the Jewish people by especially the Arab leaders since say 1890. Let all speakers stick to this survey. And stop talking about everything under the sun. This is war and in any war there is need for discipline
4. There are so many millions of Arabs NOW in this area and Israeli leaders need to know where they stand on the creation of the Jewish state. Just that. On the basis of the results of such a poll Jewish leaders can take necessary action
5. A leadership which is unconcerned about what the BBC says. All international Media barred from Israel. Reporters who enter the war on the side of the enemy do so at their own risk but they will not report from Israeli ground. Britain did this in the Argentine and Gulf Wars
6. Withdraw from the UN
7. Place Nuclear weaponry on the ready against any enemy of Israel, especially of USm UN and NATO. Make an alliance with any force in the world which is being threatened by NATO, such as the Serbs and Russian Ukraine
8. No Arabs to work in Israeli firms. No taxes to be collected for Arabs. No electricity to Arabs. No aid to Arabs.
9. For every single rocket fired at Israel take a section of land and remove Arabs from that section
10. Forget about being “democratic”. There is no democracy in war NONE! The great Arab and African leader Muammar Gadhafi tried at the end of his life and rule to be more “democratic” and to be a friend of America. Gadhafi was sacrificed by Obama to the Jihadists. The very same lesson applies very much to Israeli and Israelis today

 

NOTE 1

Yes it is essential that Israel and Israelis have borders which can be defended. This central point must be highlighted continually – the total size of the area west of the river is less than the size of Munster. This is a central point. Maps show where the borders must lie in order for Israel to be able to defend itself. These borders are obvious to a school child in primary school. They stand out and are roughly the River, the Golan, the Mediterranean Sea, and Sinai. The poll mentioned above is fundamental because it will put down in black and white what are Arab intentions. On the basis of those intentions Israelis will act in a scientific manner. As part of this and until this scientific poll is taken then all Arabs are debarred from travelling into Israel to work in Israeli firms, and Israeli firms will be closed down by the state if they employ such Arabs

 

NOTE 2

The basis of the thinking of the 4international on these issues is rooted in our history. In 1937 leon Trotsky fought for Palestine to be made into the Homeland of the Jews and he stated that the Jewish Homeland must be defended against “Mohammedanism” (the then word used for Jihad). In 1938 Leon Trotsky fought to explain that the rise of Nazism and the Antisemitism of Western countries meant that millions of Jews would be cornered by the Nazis and that the Holocaust” would follow. No person on earth was clearer on this. THAT is our heritage. The whole of the Trotskyist movement also was wiped out along with the Jews, and also by the traitors to socialism in Stalinism. The murderer of Trotsky was a Stalinist (in 1940 in Mexico). THAT heritage means that today we fight on the side of the Jews against all Israel haters.

 

NOTE 3

There is NOTHING democratic about war, yet wars are inevitable as we stand. All of the present leaders of the Jews, including and especially all the “bloggers”, leave Jews unprepared for the realities of wars. The murder of the 3 Jewish youth in Hebron were abducted and murdered by the enemy who are engaged in a war against Jews. The murder of the Palestinian youth, which we oppose, was carried out if the police are to be believed only as a reaction. Also as a reaction to the passivity of Netanyahu. Netanyahu is more responsible because he is passive and hesitant. So unprepared are Jews that all Jews wanted to show how “good” and “nice” and “democratic” they were. Is the enemy impressed? Not! The whole episode has shown that Jews under present leadership are not able to fight a war to win. THAT is the main problem facing Israel.

THE WORKING CLASS REVOLUTION MUST OBLITERATE THE UNITED NATIONS

 

THE UNITED NATIONS IS THE MOST REACTIONARY BODY ON EARTH

 

THE UNITED NATIONS IS NOW COOPTING THE WARLORDS WHICH CAUSED DARFUR

 

(4INTERNATIONAL BY THE WAY TOTALLY OPPOSES NEUER BELOW WHO IN HIS REMARKS ABOUT MUAMMAR GADHAFI SHOWS HE IS A TOTAL REACTIONARY. GADHAFI WAS MURDERED BY THAT VERY SAME JIHAD AND NEUER SEEMS TO SUPPORT THAT…READ IT FOR THE INFORMATION…THE UN MUST BE OBLITERATED BY THE WORKERS SOCIALIST REVOLUTION)

 

The election of a Sudanese warlord accused of genocide to the United Nations Human Rights Council is now virtually guaranteed, since he has the full backing of the world body’s African delegation. (FOX news)

Millions dead in jihadi wars in Darfur and southern Sudan, and this is the UN’s pick for a seat on the “Human Rights” council, which includes Muslim slave-state Mauritania. The candidacies of Venezuela and Pakistan are also being protested by UN Watch and other human rights groups. 

One of Barack Hussein’s first acts as President was to reverse President Bush’s policy and seek a seat on the UN Human Rights council back in March of 2009. The Bush administration rightly shunned the United Nations’ human rights body to protest the influence of repressive states. Obama’s reversal is part of his  perverse and depraved transformation of American foreign policy. Once a force for good and freedom, we have become the very thing our nation once held in the utmost contempt.

“Outrage: Sudan’s Al-Bashir, Indicted for Genocide, is Nominated for Seat on U.N. Human Rights Council” UN Watch, August 9, 2012

Rights group UN Watch urges Ban Ki-moon, rights chief Navi Pillay to speak out
GENEVA, July 12 – Geneva-based human rights group UN Watch urged United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay to urgently speak out against the African-backed bid by Sudanese president Omar Al-Bashir, indicted for genocide by the International Criminal Court, for a seat on the U.N. Human Rights Council.

 Last week, the U.S. failed to get the council to pass a condemnation of what it said was a Syrian candidacy for 2014.

The NGO UN Watch also called on US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the EU’s Catherine Ashton to denounce and fight against Sudan’s candidacy.

“Electing Sudan to the U.N. body mandated to promote and protect human rights worldwide is like putting Jack the Ripper in charge of a women’s shelter,” said Hillel Neuer, executive director of UN Watch.

UN Watch already heads an international campaign of MPs and human rights groups opposing the candidacies of Venezuela and Pakistan.

The U.N.’s African group of states agreed behind closed doors to endorse the candidacies of Ethiopia, Gabon, Ivory Coast, Sierra Leone and Sudan. Because Africa has arranged for five countries to run for the same amount of allotted seats, Sudan’s election is virtually assured.

“Technically,” said Neuer, “Sudan must still receive an absolute majority of 97 affirmative country votes in the U.N. General Assembly’s November election for new human rights council members. However, in the history of these ballots, names presented on a closed slate have never been rejected. It’s just the way U.N. ambassadors work. And the fact is that Sudan has been chosen to head various U.N. groupings, so its election to the UNHRC, however outrageous, is a real possibility.”

Neuer said that UN rights chief Navi Pillay, who hails from South Africa, could make a big difference by speaking out. “We need her to be the moral voice here, to urge other African countries to put their names forward, and to call for unequivocal opposition to Sudan’s scandalous bid. Her role is crucial.”

“Just a year after the human rights council sought to exorcise the ghosts of its past by suspending Col. Muammar Qaddafi’s Libya — which infamously chaired the body in 2003, and was reelected a member in 2010 — it is now set to replace him with a tyrant wanted for genocide by the International Criminal Court. For how long must we have the inmates running the asylum?”

Neuer said that Sudan clearly failed to meet the criteria of UNGA Resolution 60/251, which established the UN Human Rights Council in 2006. General Assembly members are obliged to elect states to the Council by “tak[ing] into account the candidates’ contribution to the promotion and protection of human rights and their voluntary pledges and commitments made thereto.” The resolution also provides that consideration ought to be given to whether the candidate can meet the obligations of Council membership, which include (a) to “uphold the highest standards in the promotion and protection of human rights” and (b) to “fully cooperate with the Council.”

“The U.N. and the cause of human rights will be severely damaged if Al-Bashir’s Sudanese regime wins a seat,” said Neuer. 

UN Watch also called on the U.S. and the EU to lead a vigorous campaign to defeat Sudan’s candidacy, and to ensure there will be competition on the African slate of candidates.

“Last year, the democracies fought a successful campaign to defeat Syria, by persuading other countries to compete. Yet they said and did absolutely nothing in 2010 on Libya — perhaps due to lucrative oil and business deals — and Qaddafi won by a landslide. It’s vital this year that the US and the EU announce early that they are opposed to having the oppressive Sudanese regime of Al-Bashir Assad judging the world on human rights,” said Neuer.