OBAMA WILL NOT ACT AGAINST ISIL HEADCHOPPERS BECAUSE HE SUPPORTS JIHAD

Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer are wrong about Obama and ISIL in Iraq.

Pamela and Robert are both freedom fighters against Islamic Jihad and because they are freedom fighters were barred from entering Britain by the fast-becoming Fascist British Imperialist Government

This illegal action against Robert and Pamela by the British Imperialists WENT UNANSWERED BY THE FASCIST “LEFTS”

NOTICE THAT WE PUT LEFT IN INVERTED COMMAS which means that we on 4international do not consider them left or socialist

And today we learn on the websites that Socialist Unity is threatening a socialist with legal action using the British reactionary libel laws. THESE THINGS ARE ALL RELATED…

http://hurryupharry.org/2014/06/11/socialist-disunity/

BACK TO ROBERT, PAMELA AND MANY OTHER OF OUR FRIENDS IN THE ANTI JIHAD MOVEMENT

WHY THEY ARE QUITE WRONG…

Basically Pamela and Robert are saying that US Imperialism (Obama) is acting like the “bungling bear in the china shop” in the sense that it inadvertently keeps knocking over the tables of china

The bungling bear like Bush on Saddam (2003) are really kindly bungling bears but they are just a bit clumsy and keep bumping into things. That is the analysis of Pamela and Robert and it even extends to Obama who is Islam sympathetic (at least)

That is because Pamela and Robert are themselves the servants of US Imperialism.

Look at it from this angle however. The US system of capitalism is in crisis. There could be another and deeper collapse of shares and whole economy in many countries. This pulls US elites AND OTHERS LIKE SPAIN towards Fascism and Dictatorsjhip.

On dictatorship look at the hatred that Pamela showed towards Edward Snowden who was MERELY WARNING OF PLANS TOWARDS DICTATORSHIP

The Alliance of US is more and more with the likes of ISIL, with the head choppers, and that is nothing to what they will do in the Homeland US to the workers, youth and unorthodox guys like Ed Snowden

If they were serious in opposing these Arab Muslim Fascists what would the US and EU do? They would immediately rush troops to destroy ISIL (WHICH IS ONLY A FEW THOUSANDS OF FASCISTS)

Obama ruled that out! Hillary Clinton this morning on BBC ruled that out also and supported Obama inaction! Cameron does not care! The EU governments only care about boycott on Israel.

So these US and EU political elites are on the side of the headchoppers of Islam

Meanwhile as we mentioned the Socialist Unity Fascist “Lefts” are taking a legal action based on the reactionary British Libel Laws against a real socialist in Britain. Typical. That is the most Fascist thing that can be done! Stop the discussion by all means is the method of Socialist Unity.

Stopping necessary discussion and using the state libel laws is exactly what Fascists do.

4international will defend socialists against Fascists who aim to stop discussion. That is exactly what Socialist Unity is aiming to do. They are not Socialists they are Fascists in the guise of socialists. 4international says expose Socialist Unity for what they really are. We will not be silenced so more articles by us on this Socialist Unity

4international will really examine carefully the politics of this group and we will try to answer the question as to what makes Socialist Unity so easily reach for the Libel Laws of Britain, the most reactionary Fascist Laws on the planet.

Shame on them.

Call for the defence of Robert and Pamela against these same British Fascists in the British State Machine who banned them from Britain.

Yesterday R…

 

 

Yesterday Russia and China blocked the United Nations Arab League plan for Syria. Let us examine this laughingly called “Peace Plan”. It was calling for the head of state Assad to step down. It also included a clause for “FURTHER MEASURES”.

 

THAT IS THE SAME TRICKERY THAT LED TO THE DEFEAT OF BEN ALI, GAGHBO, MUBARAK AND GADHAFI (the latter most of all because the “further measures” as in Serbia involved the bombing of Libya.

 

So Russia and China were totally totally right in using their Veto to block the Arab League/Obama, really the Empire/Sharia Jihad plan.

 

Russia and China are Stalinist or former Stalinist states and they are in essence anti-Semitic. Hence their support for the Antisemetic Jihadist Killers of Iran.

 

But this issue of invasion of these Arab countries on behalf of Qaradawi and Sharia is a different matter entirely. That is separate from Iran. Iran stands in the same camp as the Nazis and Hitler towards the Jews.

 

The two issues must not be mixed up so.

 

As far as Syria is concerned it is in the interest totally of Israel that Assad wins against the Empire/Sharia Alliance. If Assad falls then Sharia will be in power in Syria, there will be a Sharia state installed there, all Christians and tribal minorities will have to flee or will be murdered.

 

A Sharia Government to replace Assad will strengthen Hamas, Hezbullah and Iran.

 

Israel therefore should defend Assad in this war.

 

This defence of Assad does not imply agreement with the political programme of the Baathist Party in Syria. But first comes defence of Assad against the Empire/Sharia Alliance.

 

For Israel to take that position is really a defence also of the Christians of Syria.

 

However to agree with Obama, Rice and Clinton, is for Israel to betray the Christian and other minorities, in fact to stick a dagger into their backs.

 

There has been a major shift towards Sharia rule in all Arab countries which in turn will make Sharia inevitable in all Islamic countries such as Indonesia.

 

Thus the future lives of literally billions of women and youth will be effected by this drive to Sharia. We on 4international emphasise that it is a partnership essentially of capitaslist states and sharia or sharia fast becoming states. For their own reasons the EU and the US is working closely with Islam.

 

{This is what is making 4international.me unique in the world. Alone in the left we are emphasising how the US and EU are in alliance with Islam. And the right are hiding this Alliance.}

 

We have emphasised that these reasons are the coming social revolts against the effects of economic crisis. There are many reasons for capitalism to be allies of Islam. And there is the historical precedent of Hitler forming a close alliance with Islam, which was incorporated in the alliance between Hajj Amin el Husseini and Hitler.

 

Jewish people must be very worried by this growing together of Empire and Sharia. This alliance was right at the heart of the Nazi Holocaust. NOBODY CAN DENY THAT, NOT ONE PERSON, IT IS ALL DOCUJMENTED HISTORICALLY.

 

It is therefore of great concern to 4international that influential Jewish bloggers like Caroline Glick (but there are many others too) are not only not defending Assad (and the Christians and other Syrian minorities) but are actually joining with Obama and Cameron to defeat Assad.

 

That piece of opportunism can lead to the destruction of Israel.

 

Without principled leaders Israel will be destroyed. Apart from 4international where are those principled leaders?

AFTER THE FOUL MURDER OF MUAMMAR GADHAFI NOW A REIGN OF TERROR BY ISLAMISTS

 

Yes, I have just had time to look through the very influential blog of Pamela Geller.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/

 

POINT NUMBER ONE

Pamela Geller carries on her site an important article which deals with the murder and torture of the many Africans and Libyans who were supportive of Muammar Gadhafi

 

POINT NUMBER TWO

 

Pamela Geller does not explain how she said nothing when her buddies on Jihadwatch called for abstentionism in the Jihad against Gadhafi. In other words she allowed it to happen.

 

POINT NUMBER 3

 

Geller NOW refers to the grisly murder of Muammar Gadhafi. But she does not deal with her own remark at the time “And good riddance too!”

 

POINT NUMBER 4

 

Geller is just carrying on this rot inside the bourgeois Zionist Movement. I can find in her leading articles no defence of Assad in Syria who also IS FACING THE WRATH OF THE OBAMA/MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD/QATAR/QARADAWI JIHAD. That is Syria’s turn and Geller is silent.

 

You with me? There is something fraudulent going on here. None of them are defending Assad from the Jihad. Just as they did not defend Mubarak or Gadhafi unconditionally either.

 

You see? Basically all of these bourgeois Zionist leaders like Geller, and like Belman of Israpundit, and like Spencer, they condemn the Jihad AFTER the Jihad has been successful.

 

Can Jews be safe behind bourgeois Zionist leaders like Geller who will warn of the danger only after the danger has struck and the Jihad has been successful and all opposition to the Jihad has been put down. Then it is too late.

 

In the following report on Libya today with all of its torture and its planned Sharia Law Geller takes the daily mail Report.

 

The introduction by Geller at the beginning makes interesting reading. She is now correct. The Government of Gadhafi WAS largely secular. Nobody explained why Gadhafi gave such a welcome to Black and often Christian Africans over so many years, and that they all felt safe in Libya, but NOT safe in other Arab countries. Many of these Black Africans loved Gadhafi but hated other Arab states and rulers. And Gadhafi was NOT according to Jim Squires responsible for Lockerbie. He was bullied into taking the blame.

 

But why did Geller go along with Spencer and Shirk that she had no dog in this fight?

 

And why on the murder of Gadhafi did Geller say “And good riddance too!”

 

{In the Daily Mail report which Geller uses you will notice that these British imperialists and fascists in the mail keep up the black propaganda against Muammar Gadhafi}

 

 

(start article here)

 

 

 

Obama’s Interventionism: Libyan Opposition Being Viciously Tortured

 

I wondered why Obama didn’t laud his human rights record in Libya, Egypt and Iran in his #SOTU….. /sarc tag off.

He didn’t mention the vicious sodomy and barbaric murder of Ghaddafi by Obama-supported sharia savages. Nor did his royal flyness mention the barbaric atrocities and genocide of blacks committed by anti-Gaddafi Muslims during last year’s Obama Libya moment.

Obama ‘s war against Libya unleashed hell on earth in Libya. Linda R queries, “Is it ethical for US/NATO to ignore the agony and massive suffering their unjust, illegal war created? And just walk away and leave HELL ON EARTH in Libya?

This is Obama’s slash and burn foreign policy, helping to destroy secular regimes in order to install jihadist rule. In this he has been completely and utterly successful.

Where are the media O-hos on this?

 

Pro-Gaddafi supporters in Libya are being tortured, says United Nations Daily Mail

• 8,000 loyalists loyalists being ill-treated by militia men – human rights report
• Medicins Sans Frontieres pulls out of Misrata
• Amnesty International claim there have been deaths at Libyan detention centres

Britain and its NATO allies spent billions freeing Libyans from the evil clutches of Colonel Gaddafi, but what exactly has replaced him?

Democratic elections are still some way away, there’s serious unrest in several cities and today a United Nations report reveal that up to 8,000 pro-Gaddafi supporters were being held by militia groups in Libya.

Human Rights Commissioner Navi Pillay claimed they are being held in appalling conditions and are being abused and tortured.

While Amnesty International state that detainees have died after being tortured by militias in detention centres.

 

 

The organisation’s medical staff said they were were being asked to patch up detainees mid-way through torture sessions so they could go back for more abuse.

The agency said it was in Misrata, about 130 miles east of the Libyan capital and scene of some of the fiercest battles in the conflict, to treat war-wounded detainees but was instead having to treat fresh wounds.

Meantime, the UN’s Mrs Pillay said the problem was down to militias working outside of government control.

She added: ‘The lack of oversight by the central authorities creates an environment conducive to torture and ill treatment. My staff have received alarming reports that this is happening in places of detention that they have visited.’

 

Abuse claims: Ibrahim Mohammed says he was tortured at the hands of the Gharyan city forces earlier this month. His claims support assertions by the United Nations that torture and violence is widespread

General Director of MSF Christopher Stokes reinforced the UN assertions and said: ‘Patients were brought to us in the middle of interrogation for medical care, in order to make them fit for more interrogation.

‘This is unacceptable. Our role is to provide medical care to war casualties and sick detainees, not to repeatedly treat the same patients between torture sessions.

The agency said it has raised the issue with the authorities in Misrata and with the national army.

‘No action was taken,’ said Stokes. ‘We have therefore come to the decision to suspend our medical activities in the detention centres.’

Rights groups have repeatedly raised concerns about torture being used against people, many of them sub-Saharan Africans, suspected of having fought for Muammar Gaddafi’s forces during Libya’s nine-month civil war.

Reports of the mistreatment and disappearances of suspected Gaddafi loyalists have embarrassed Libya’s ruling National Transitional Council (NTC), which had vowed to make a break with practices under Gaddafi and respect human rights.

They are installing a sharia government. Sharia is the opposite of humanity.

The allegations are also awkward for the Western powers which backed the anti-Gaddafi rebellion and helped install Libya’s new leaders.