THE AMERICAN RULERS AND THE EUROPEAN ELITES ARE BEHIND THE IRANIAN FASCIST MULLAHS

As usual Pamela Geller, the courageous blogger from New York, is leading the way.

This post by Geller is about a number of things:

1. The American and European ruling clases are rowing in behind Islam. They are now supporting Islam as the new great hope for humanity.

The American and European ruling elites are now fully on the side of the Iranian Mullahs.

2. My reasoning about this is thus: If these elites are on the side of Islam and the Mullahs, which represses the Iranian workers, women and youth without any mercy, then this is not an accident. What then may be the reasons?

3. I suggest: They fear a collapse of their own system. They fear massive opposition to their rule from many sources. They also fear economic collapse given the debt which America is running on.

There is now a continual cover up of the issue of Islam especially in its attitude to Christians living in the Middle East. These Christians are being driven out.

The present Pope Francis is a Jesuit and he has proved to be basically a supporter of these Christians being driven out of the Middle East, from countries such as Iraq, because he has done hardly anything. FRANCIS IS RELATIVELY SILENT.

Pope Francis should have said that his Christian flock was being decimated by Islam and that the only thing Christians should do now is join with the Jews, and defend Israel as a haven for Christians and Jews against Sharia. He should have said that even not all can live in Israel, but if Israel falls … it will be the total end of Christians in the Middle East too.

What lies behind the EU in this article being such slavish supporters of the Iranian Hanging Mullahs? I think it is the same as the Vatican, the same as the American ruling class led at present by Obama (but whoever leads it is the same because all of them from Reagan to Carter were the same Antisemites), and I think that sameness quality is Antisemitism.

The real and actual history of the Left is NOT Antisemitic.

Karl Marx was not an Antisemite! Far from it! Karl Marx opposed the Anarchist Bakunin over this very issue. Karl Marx fought for Jews in Prussia to have full political rights. Just as the politically correct crowd did with the British poet Philip Larkin you can go over his private letters etc. and pick out one or two quotes. These gangsters, I mean intelectual gangsters, did that with Larkin to “prove” he was a racist. THAT is NOT history got it!

Those people who Pamela sometimes calls “leftist” are not of the historical left at all. Before we go any further in the anti-Jihad movement let us get historical accuracy on this. If we do not have historical accuracy we have nothing. Support www.4international.me and help us to get a theoretical journal running which will clear up these historical untruths

I am a socialist to the very nth degree and yet i opposed totally the Geneva deal with Iran. To further illustrate my position my comments opposing the deal were kicked off the Facebook Page of “Talk Radio Europe” also known as TRE, and it is a commercial and totally capitalist concern (it relies for existence on business adverts) and believe it or not it is owned by a Jewish man Martin Nathan.

People should not just follow the crowd but should start to have historical accuracy and general accuracy. I wish Pamela and Robert would be more careful in their terminology especially their use of the Word “leftist”.

(START ARTICLE HERE)

No halt to executions while EU delegation visits Iran

Iranian-police-officers-a-009

Stunning, 38 death sentences were carried out during a six day visit to Tehran by the European Parliament delegation ….. Europe comfortably reverts to it’s heinous past.

While oppositive activists in Iran consider “the current U.S. administration is among the weakest in U.S. history”.

No halt to executions while EU delegation visits Iran,” By Mosa Zahed,  UPI, December 26, 2013 (thanks to Philip)

LONDON, Dec. 26 (UPI) — Last week a European Parliament delegation returned from a six-day visit to Tehran, the first official visit to Iran in more than six years.The five-member delegation was led by the chairwoman of European Parliament’s friendship delegation with Iran, Tarja Cronberg from Finnish Greens and included Cornelia Ernst, German communist; Isabelle Durant, Belgian Greens; Marietje Schaake, Dutch Liberals; and Josef Weidenholzer, Austrian Social Democrats.

During their Dec. 13-18 visit at least 38 death sentences were carried out official Iranian media sources said. This while many executions in prisons are conducted in secret and news of those is rarely released.

Many MEPs including those from the Group of the European People’s Party, the largest in the European Parliament, refused to go to Iran in protest of the country’s gross human rights violations.

Some analysts argue that this rare visit took place in the context of the Geneva talks, which are aimed at normalizing relations between Iran and the West by convincing the ayatollahs to give up their nuclear ambitions. However, others have pointed out that for the Iranian side, the ultimate goals of the Geneva talks remain breaking sanctions, forcing the West to accept a nuclear Iran and eliminating chances for regime change by the democratic opposition.

Opposition activists suggest that since “the current U.S. administration is among the weakest in U.S. history” Iran wants to use the opportunity to enhance its hegemony over the region and would thus warmly welcome any lifting of the crippling sanctions that have delayed its nuclear weapons ambitions.

 

They claim that by offering lucrative oil and natural gas contracts, the regime wants to intimidate the West, particularly the European Union, to ease the sanctions. Countries such as Sweden, traditionally seen as human rights advocates, have placed themselves first in line. Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt recently declared that he sees no problem in removing the sanctions as early as January. Other countries, such as Italy, have already sent foreign ministers to seize business opportunities if the sanctions are lifted.

To help the European delegation justify their visit, the Iranian Foreign Ministry took two former political prisoners, Nasrin Sotoudeh and Jafar Panahi, winners of the European Parliament’s prestigious Sakharov Prize, to the Greek Embassy in Tehran to meet with them discreetly.

Upon her return from Tehran, Cronberg made contradictory remarks in Brussels in favor of the “moderate” Iranian President Hassan Rouhani. She praised him for keeping his “promise to improve human rights” by freeing a handful of political prisoners, something observers had stressed was part of his charm offensive before going to United Nations in September.

However, she failed to explain the twofold increase in executions during Rouhani’s term and instead defended him by saying that “the judiciary is not under his control.”

“So Rouhani is only responsible for the good things that his judiciary does and not the bad things!” a Twitter user replied to Cronberg after the news conference.

In her interview with the Persian section of Radio Free Europe, she said: “We have to bear in mind that Iranians say that their values are different from Europeans. This is true but we have to sit down and discuss these values and accept our differences … and we must bear in mind that in comparison with the European Union, religion plays a very important role in Iran. We’re a liberal society and Iran is a highly conservative society.”

Commenting on this, U.S.-based Iranian journalist and human rights activist Hassan Dai wrote on his blog: “No, you are not mistaken, these are not the remarks of Sadegh Larijani — Head of Iran’s notorious Judiciary, these are the words of Tarja Cronberg!”

The delegation chairwoman didn’t condemn the 450 executions since Rouhani became president and said: “When we discussed the executions with Iranian authorities, we realized that more than 80 percent of executions were in connection with drug-related offenses. They are working on this issue. … they do not intend to abolish the death penalty but are thinking about slowing down. I think that until here is a good sign.”

While in Tehran, Cronberg told EuroNews that she was impressed that women have “their own fraction” in the Iranian Parliament which “is an evolvement in the society.” No criticism was mentioned about the fact that only nine out of 290 members of the Iranian Parliament are women.

In her Brussels press briefing she said, “There is no regime change on the agenda, there is no revolution on its way but there is a step by step transformation.”

She also claimed that the regime has “equal rights for women in all their laws” and added “but because women were not breadwinners, it was natural that men had higher incomes.”

But, as the Iranian Penal code states, the life of a woman has half the value of a man’s. Article 300 of the code states that the “Deyeh” (blood money) of a Muslim woman is half of the “Deyeh” of a man. “A woman cannot leave her home without her husband’s permission, even to attend her father’s funeral” (Article 105 of the Civil Code).

“It is really an insult to all women rights activists to hear an EU parliamentarian lobbying for the mullahs in this way. Such comments will only give freer hands to the government to justify the institutionalized repression against women,” Mariam Amiri, rights activist in Amsterdam said.

Commenting on the visit to Iran, Kazem Mousavi, founder of Iran’s Green Party, said in a radio interview from Berlin: “One can conclude that according to these parliamentarians, human rights violations or their non-improvement are a result of values enshrined in Islamic and cultural beliefs of people in Iran and at the end of the day, the regime is only implementing the people’s ideals and values. So this repression and these executions are merely a cultural difference between the West and Iran and we should accept them for the time being.”

He added, “Given that the Left parties in Europe no longer have the socialist bloc of the past, for these European greens and socialists the last stronghold to defend their political principles, they assume, is to support the Islamic Republic of Iran, especially since they both share a common anti-American and anti-Israeli stance.

“Unfortunately the mullahs have managed to deceive them by portraying themselves as victims of Western hard-liners. So here the murderers become the victims!”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s