by Felix Quigley

September 30, 2009

In 2006 Jared Israel wrote the following and the points he made are very relevant today


Read it yourself on


Why TENC is Posting “Ahmadinejad’s World
by Jared Israel

I see two main problems with the extensive media coverage of Iran’s President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.  One is the media’s tendency to accept Ahmadinejad’s preferred self-image, that of a third world populist, albeit with Islamist views, regarding whom the media celebrates supposed signs of moderation.  This approach avoids examining Ahmadinejad’s ideology and its roots in the political life of post 1979 (i.e., Islamist) Iran. 

Matthias Küntzel’s piece, “Ahmadinejad’s World,” goes a long way towards filling the void of ignorance about how this man thinks. It turns out that not only does Ahmadinejad deny the Holocaust, sponsor Hezbollah, and incite the murder of Jewish people around the world, but he took part in the government-organized murder of untold thousands of Iranian children, and is now promoting a state cult glorifying that murder.

The second problem is that the media – mainstream, extreme right, extreme left, alternative, pro-Israel, anti-Israel – unquestioningly propounds the view, fostered by the US and Iranian governments, that they are what they appear: fierce opponents.  Evidence contradicting this view is disregarded; for example, I could find no English language newspaper or TV news program that even noted the following remark, which Ahmadinejad made during his UN speech a week ago:

“The occupiers are incapable of establishing security in Iraq. Despite the establishment of the lawful Government and National Assembly of Iraq, there are covert and overt efforts to heighten insecurity, magnify and aggravate differences within Iraqi society, and instigate civil strife.” (My emphasis – JI)
–Transcript of Ahmadinejad’s UN speech

Two things are noteworthy here.

First, Ahmadinejad did not, in this quote or anywhere else in his speech, demand that the US get out of Iraq.  Rather, he criticized the occupation forces for being “incapable of establishing security.” 

Second, Ahmadinejad referred to the current Iraqi government as “the lawful Government and National Assembly of Iraq.”  But said government is the creature of the occupation forces, first and foremost the US. For example, US Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad oversaw the writing of the Iraqi constitution.

For three years we have been told that the US is on the verge of a military assault on Iran. Yet here is the Iranian President, commenting on the presence of massive US and allied forces in Iraq, and instead of denouncing this multi-national attack force on his doorstep, instead of saying, “Of course we need nuclear weapons; thousands of US and other infidel troops are poised on our border!” – instead he chides the US for not being tough enough and commends the US-created Iraqi government as “lawful.”  Doesn’t this suggest that the US-Iranian relationship is different from what it appears? That mutual denunciations and threats made by the Bush and Ahmadinejad governments may be political theater? But this and much other evidence that, as Emperor’s Clothes predicted before the US went into Iraq, Iran has gained from the invasion and has in crucial ways supported US efforts – this evidence is simply ignored. [I]

Food for thought, about which more later. First, here is Matthias Küntzel’s account of what President Ahmadinejad has done and what he stands for. As you read, consider what it means for Ahmadinejad to say the Iraqi government is “lawful.”

Jared Israel
Editor, Emperor’s Clothes

I would like to add another point to the above by Jared Israel.

It got little media coverage but I read in a brief report that the CIA interviews with Saddam showed that Saddam was above all fearful of Iran, thus Saddam boasted every chance he got that Iraq had nuclear weapons. This was deliberate and indeed throws a new light on why the US took out the relatively speaking anti Islam regime of Saddam and promoted thus the Islamic Republic

These interviews should be made available for all to read.

But they will not be because they tell too much about US and EU programme of alliance with Islam.

The big question is why is America allied with Islam.

To understand that one must make a study of the history of America and the history of Islam.

As we noted the American Revolution and the life of Tom Paine is very relevant in today´s puzzle.


by Felix Quigley

30 September, 2009


Iran is the big issue which is facing anybody who is in the slightest interested in the world around them, in reality (another name of course for politics) today


What exactly is Iran? What is the Islamic Re`public? What is therefore Islam?


A major question is why is all of the so called “Left” in support of Iran to one degree or another?


What is the role of Stalinism in the left wing movement? What is the historical role of Leon Trotsky who inside the socialist moveemnt fought against the ebtrayals of Stalinism?


What is the roots of the present hatred for Israel among those who call themselves socialists?


What is the connection between the hatred for Zionism which the Soviets in the 60s adopted and churned out in massive propaganda.


And indeed what actually is Zionism?


The latter question is of such importance we cannot allow it to hang in the air as it were. Zionism is the wish of the Jewish people to have a Homeland of their own. Not just any Homeland but in the aprt of earth that they were expelled from in the most brutal fashion by the Romans. This also means that this wish for a Homeland is interconnected with their Book, the Bible, which among other things is a history of their people.


So in that real sense every Jew who is conscious of himself as a Jew is a Zionist.


It is the oldest nationn on the earth and ebcause it is the oldest this aspect of the issue has drawn the most bitter attacks from so called “socialists” who unfortunately treat theory and history as a dogma.


1. What is Iran today?


2. Who was Hajj Amin el Husseini? What is the link between Islam and the Third Reich of Hitler (Nazism)


3. Great Britain is based on many things but one of them is racism. This is shown very clearly in their attitude to the Irish over many generations. So in the key period of 1920 following the First WEorld War Britain was racist towards the Jews in Palestine. And that form of racism is also called anti-Semitism


4. Mein Kamph was a critical document. This document led on to the Wannsee Conference held in a suburb of Berlin in January 20, 1942, at which was planned the extermination of the whole of the Jewish people. Even Ireland was listed at this conference and the 4000 Jews in Ireland in 1942 were noted down for extermination. Every Jew in Ireland at that time is thus a “Holocaust Survivor”, indeed ewvery jew on the planet must be termed as a Holocaust survivor.


5.The role of Henry Ford leading on to the Holocaust


“In 1918, Ford’s closest aide and private secretary, Ernest G. Liebold, purchased an obscure weekly newspaper, The Dearborn Independent for Ford. The Independent ran for eight years, from 1920 until 1927, during which Liebold was editor. The newspaper published “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion,” which was discredited by The Times of London as a forgery during the Independent’s publishing run.”


6. The role of Tom Paine

Born 29 January 1737

Died 8 July 1809

Author of two key works which had a great influence on America and which is relevant in today´s discussion


Common Sense

The Rights of Man

And from this the connection between the British Revolution under Cromwell, the American and French Revolutions


8. Who was Karl Marx and his friend Engels? How do they figure in this narrative, greatly see our notes on the left above.


In order to understand the left and its hatred for Zionism we must understand October 1917, Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky. Thus the 4international.



So it can be seen that the present situation and the answer to the first question, what is Iran today, what is Islam, what is Christianity, what is Judaism, is a very complex question



We will look at some of these in more detail as we go on.


by Felix Quigley

September 27, 2009


This is the report by Jihadwatch on the crucial issue of the finding of that secret Iranian Nuclear Bomb plant

[begin report here]


Although the CIA and National Security Agency (NSA) has been tracking construction of the plant for several years, Mr Obama decided it was time to put maximum pressure on Tehran by revealing its existence.” It is likely that Obama is overestimating the impact this will have upon the mullahs. They respect strength. The threat of sanctions is not strength.

“Iran admits to secret second nuclear plant built inside mountain,” by Michael Evans and Nico Hines for the Times Online, September 25 (thanks to Alexandre):

Iran has informed the International Atomic Energy Agency that it has been building a previously undeclared nuclear facility to enrich uranium, raising fears that Tehran is closer to acquiring an atomic bomb than has been predicted up until now.

The presence of a secret second site – built inside a mountain near the holy Shia city of Qum – has been known about by American and other Western intelligence agencies for some time, although nothing has been revealed until now.

Iran’s formal letter to the IAEA in Vienna, sent on Monday, pre-empted an announcement to be made today by President Obama, Gordon Brown and President Sarkozy of France before the opening of the G20 economic summit in Pittsburgh, in which Tehran will be accused of building the secret facility about 100 miles southwest of the Iranian capital.

Although the CIA and National Security Agency (NSA) has been tracking construction of the plant for several years, Mr Obama decided it was time to put maximum pressure on Tehran by revealing its existence.

Reports from Washington indicate that Iran had learnt of the West’s uncovering of its second plant and moved to declare it formally to the IAEA.

Iran wrote a brief, cryptic letter to the IAEA saying it now had a “pilot plant” under construction, whose existence it had not revealed. Iran’s first and officially declared facility is at Natanz in southern Iran.

Marc Vidricaire, IAEA spokesman, said: “I can confirm that on September 21 Iran informed the IAEA in a letter that a new pilot fuel-enrichment plant is under construction in the country. The letter stated that the enrichment level would be up to 5 per cent.”

Uranium enriched to around 5 per cent can be used as nuclear fuel, but has to be enriched to around 90 per cent to be effective in a nuclear weapon. The United States, Britain and other Western countries believe that Iran has been attempting, at its plant at Natanz, to achieve a higher enrichment of uranium, although the plant has been subject to IAEA inspections….







I heard Obama say (on a TV appearance) that he planned to have IAEA “investigate” the Iranian nuclear plants…whoo hoo, like the Iranians are going to cooperate…”You realize that the head of the IAEA is named Mohammad? Right? I Think that Iran will cooperate with the IAEA, because the head of the IAEA is a fucking Muslem!

Its like sending a Nazi to inspect a concentration camp!




September 26, 2009

The trap which is set for Israel through its links with the US Government is seen in the following report about the Russian Stalinists from YNet


Russia said on Friday that Iran’s construction of a second uranium enrichment plant violated UN Security Council decisions and should be investigated immediately by the U.N. nuclear watchdog.


A statement by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev called on Iran to cooperate with the proposed probe and said Moscow remained committed to dialogue with Tehran on nuclear issues. The statement made no mention of sanctions. (Reuters),7340,L-3782006,00.html


Note in the above these reactionaries say they remain open to dialogue with Iran. Now this is precisely the same position that Obama takes.


Yet the discovery of the plant near QOM which the iranians were keeping hidden shows that Iran is determined to get the nuclear bomb.


So what then is there to talk about?


The more they talk surely then the more time that Iran has got to create its nuclear bomb.


It is only some weeks that America was threatening to blow out of the skies any Israeli planes that were moving against Iran.


Sop it seems to us here that the US Government of Obama and the Putin Government are going hand in hand to try to stop Israel doing anything.


This is extreme antisemitism by both Obama and the Russians.


The Iranian Government have been totally explicit that they intend to destroy the Israeli state, calling it a cancer, a dirty black virus etc.


Yet Obama and the Russian Stalinists hand in hand are trying to stop Israel defending itself.


In this situation Netanyahu must break free from these antisemites on the world stage.


Israel must now act independently against the Iranian Nazis of Ahmadinejad and must also make a direct appeal to the Israeli and Iranian peoples to join together in a unity against antisemitism.


The position of these Putin Stalinists is also tragic for the Russian peoples as well as for the Jewish because Russia faces a direct threat from Islam in its own country.

Iranian Ahmadinejad Fascists must be stopped



















We now enter a period of the terminal decline of the capitalist system


We also enter a period of wars, revolutions and do not forget counter revolutions.


It is the counter revolution that Obama is leading in the world todaty, as he turns America away decisively and finally from the principles of the American Revolution, the principles of Thomas Paine, author of Common Sense and The Rights of Man.


In this situation all of the traditional leaders are found wanting and themselves are bound to enter into deep crisis and terminal decline.


We are now in a situation where either the Israeli Government, its army and air force will be able to destroy the Iranian Bomb, or Israel will perish.


Also if Israel is not successful then the whole of the Middle East, and Europe, especially all the countries in the Meditteranean, will be in danger, great danger of Nuclear Conflagration



A Jewish man who was interviewed on a Jewish street in Israel by the BBC asserted his opinion as to why the US was sticking its nose into affairs between Arabs and Jews.


This is not only a good comment but represents an historical change in the Jewish people of Israel.


For many decades Jews and Israel have looked to America as the “land of the free”.


What we have seen on Israpundit, a Jewish blog, is that the traditional leaders of the Jewish people are bankrupt and can offer only defeat.


This is a conclusion I reach after watching the various political positions of a whole selection of bloggers there who are pretty representative of the whole Jewish movement.


Let us take some of these “personalities”.


The editor Ted Belman. He swings from one position to another but essentially remains tied to the US political class, mainly republican, as shown in his recent support for Sarah Palin as a possible “saviour”, a crazy idea you might think.


Long time writer Bill Narvey. Remains tied to all US Governments democrat or republican, is very anti revolutionary and is conservative with a small c. His record towards the Serbs degutted the Jewish movement.


Yamit82. The origins of this man are hazy. He claimed to have tea with Ben Gurion. This man is out of the nigoted side of Judaism and is so inward looking that he cannot stop himself from attacking every other tendency and person on the planet. As he would have walked into Hitlers death camps he would have exclaimed “Good! At last we are alone”. This man does not have ONE single policy to put forward, he holds the ordinary peiople of Israel in total contempt, openly saying that only a minority counts. That is a minority with the knowledge and backed by a supernatural of course!


A Bill Levinson and a Ayn Reagan. Simply advocates for the Republicans in America. Their connection with Jews in Israel is purely secondary to that. Reagan is an open supporter of Nixon and the butchery of US in Vietnam and Cambodia. Essentially both in the footsteps of Joe McCarthy


The essential problem with all of these people, and I stress that they mirror rather accurately what goes on in the Jewish movement as a whole, for example Yamit82 is a Feiglin without his character, is that they turn their back consciously on finding out the truth about history.


To these people the English Revolution of Cromwell means nothing, the French Revolution nothing to them, and when it comes to the dialectic of socialist thought they deliberately close their minds because in American elitist tradition they are total anti communists, in fact are communist haters and baiters. Consequently you will never find one of these people trying to understand the phenomenon of Stalinism. All have nothing but hatred for Trotsky and set out consciously to hide and distort his principles and principled struggle.


And as we move in to a situation of extreme peril for the Jewish people, and extreme peril for people everywhere, in a situation where Nazi Islam represented by Iran has to be stopped, the very question of leadership and of  the building of the revolutionary party is number one question of the day.


by Felix Quigley

September 17 2009


The case of Rifka Bary was summed up in this comment on Jihadwatch


I hope I’m wrong…on both accounts, but…
The proof that she was in danger will be in the form of her dead body.
The proof that Iran wants to nuke Israel will come in the form of a mushroom cloud over same.
On the former, she only has to hold out a little longer and she can file for emancipation I bleeb.

On the latter…stash some gas cause Israels about to kick ass. No mushroom clouds allowed over Jerusalem…unless they drift over from Iran.

islam is a lie and
Truth is killing it.


Yes indeed this is correct. Islam is indeed a lie and the main purveyors of this lie are the Governments of the western caspitalist world, especially of the US and of the EU.


They are assisted in this by the Left, so called, which is in support of Islam.


the reference above to Iran, Israel, and the danger to Israel from an Iranian Nuclear bomb is especially apt.


We have shown in recent articles here that the essence of the Iranian regime is utter falsehood. I believe the technical name for thios form of Islam lying is “takkiya”.


This is of erxtreme importance because we on 4international believe that Iran with the nuclear bomb is of exttreme danger to Israel and its population of Jews.


Of course many Arabs would also be killed by any sort of Iranian nuclear action on Israel, because Israel geographically is a tiny country.


That however would not deter Iranian Islam in the slightest because the war which they waged against Iraq when Saddam was in power a couple of decades ago shows that Islam places no value on human life, including the life of its own people, since they have the concept of martyrdom, a concept to be used in any situation.


It appears that Rifka is a Sri Lankan girl and the following comment from JW shows that the danger to this girl is going to be long time


In it, Mr. Safi notes that individual apostates cannot be killed for a “quiet desertion of personal Islamic duties,” but can be put to death as “just punishment” when the apostate deserts Islam publicly.

You can’t desert Islam much more publicly than by seeking refuge through the Infidel courts.

Even if Rifqa’s parents decided that doing her in might draw too much unwanted attention on them at this point, members of the fundamentalist mosque the family attended in Ohio would likely “see to things”.

The other likely scenario is that she would be sent back to Sri Lanka–away from the possible protection of a sympathetic American legal system–and either murdered or forced into an arranged marriage and “reversion”.



This comment also on JW from Hesperando deals with a vital isue, that is how Islam seeks to obfuscate facts. the reference is to the Guardola report


Agent Guandolo has produced a nice tight, lean mean argument: no more fat or irrelevant tissue left for any Occam’s Razor to shave off: all muscle and brain. The PC MC establishment and the Muslim apologists they enable, however, don’t like just the facts, ma’am: they like, and need, obfuscation — lots of fat and complicating tissues to distract from the grimly clear diagnosis of the disease, and thence the appropriate treatment. The latter does this out of mendacious evil, the former out of what I call quantum ignorance, born of the muddled sincerity of its acolytes.


This case of a little ex Muslim girl in America is of extreme importance. Her name is Rifka Bary.

Jihadwatch has carried the following report by an FBI investigator into the probable or possible risk to Ms bary from her parents. The re`port is self explanatory


[begin report by FBI investigator Guandola here}


“Florida Department of Law Enforcement earns an F,” by John D. Guandolo for the Center for Security Policy, September 16:

[Note: John D. Guandolo is a 12 ½ year veteran of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. At the request of the Center for Security Policy, he prepared an assessment of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement’s (FDLE) investigation of the Ohio-based parents of former Muslim Rifqa Bary, the 17-year old apostate from Islam who has sought refuge in the state of Florida. The FDLE report is provided here, and is available as searchable text for the first time, below his analysis. The significant errors and omissions that Mr. Guandolo and other experts have found in this FDLE investigation show a failure in FDLE’s professional responsibility in handling the Rifqa Bary case. Governor Crist and FDLE management need to get new investigators on the job, start over, and this time do it right. A life may be at stake due to FDLE negligence– and willful blindness– in conducting this investigation.]
John D. Guandolo:
Response to FDLE Investigative Report on Rifqa Bary Matter

Upon my review of the report filed by the FDLE regarding the Rifqa Bary Matter in Florida, I offer my professional opinion.

1. The Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) Investigative Summary OR-73-1741 encapsulates the investigation into allegations made by Fathima Rifqa Bary (hereafter referred to as “Rifqa Bary”) that she is or may be in physical danger from her father, Mohamed Bary, or others. Point 4 on page 2 of the report states Rifqa Bary believes her life to be in danger from an “honor killing” by her family or others, which she states is in accordance with Islamic Law. The report finds: “Ms. Bary’s concern that she may be killed because of her conversion from Islam to Christianity remains a subjective and speculative concern…” and concludes there is no conspiracy to commit violence against her. The investigators in this matter offer this opinion void of any knowable facts. In fact, a due diligence review would reveal the existence of authoritative Islamic Law texts officially translated into English. This review would further reveal Islamic Law – which is real law – has requirements and rules as to how to deal with those who leave Islam [eg The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law, “Umdat al-Salik” also known as “Reliance of the Traveller” – publicly available]. If it can be shown (1) there is a requirement in Islamic Law for killing Ms. Bary as a publicly declared apostate from Islam, (2) that her parents adhere to Islamic Law, and (3) that she did, in fact, leave Islam and convert to Christianity, then the FDLE has a professional responsibility to include these facts in this report, and investigate this matter fully. There is nothing subjective about this – these are all ascertainable facts. I would hope the Florida State’s Attorney’s Office has done their due diligence on this matter and is aware of this

2. Mr. Bary’s comments to the Investigators claiming there is “absolutely not” any concept of Honor Killings under Islamic Law can also be comparatively and factually reviewed against Islamic Law. There are, in fact, rules and requirements as to how apostates should be handled within the context of Islamic Law, and these facts must be reviewed by FDLE if a professional and factual report is to be completed.

3. It was noted that the Executive Director of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) -Columbus (Ohio) and the Staff Attorney for CAIR were present during the interview of Mr. Bary by FDLE Investigators. Absent from the FDLE report was any mention that CAIR is a known Muslim Brotherhood entity and an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation (HLF) trial – the largest terrorism financing trial in U.S. history – revealing HLF as a Hamas/Muslim Brotherhood front in the United States. All defendants in this case were found guilty in November 2008 and are serving long prison terms. These facts about CAIR were testified to at trial, and accepted as legally true. They are irrefutable – the documents demonstrating these facts were stipulated to by the defense. The Muslim Brotherhood’s (MB) creed is “Allah is our goal; the Messenger is our guide: the Koran is our constitution; Jihad is our means; and martyrdom in the way of Allah is our inspiration,” and their stated objective in America is a “Civilization-Jihad” to destroy the United States from within, and the MB exists to implement Islamic Law here in the United States. All of these facts are relevant for two critical reasons. First, these material facts should be made known to the State Attorney’s Office and any Judges involved in this case as a matter of course. Secondly, when representatives from an organization that is objectively known to be hostile towards to the United States and unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in U.S. history, are allowed to be present during a law enforcement interview of someone, it raises questions as to why they were allowed to be present at the interview at all. These facts further demand an objective look to determine if the Muslim Brotherhood itself has a position on Islamic Law and Apostasy. One of the MB’s two stated objectives is to implement Islamic Law in North America (and across the globe), and it is known they call for adherence to Islamic Law wherever Muslim communities exist. The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law: Reliance of the Traveller is approved as valid Islamic Law by the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), a known Muslim Brotherhood entity, as proven in the HLF trial. In Reliance of the Traveller, Investigators will find specific legal doctrine on how apostates are to be treated under Islamic Law. Furthermore, the Muslim Brotherhood has a history of officially addressing the issue of Apostasy. In 1984, Ismail R. Al-Faruki , the Founder of IIIT, stated: “That is why Islamic Law has treated people who have converted out of Islam as political traitors…[Islam] must deal with the traitors when convicted after due process of law either with banishment, life imprisonment, or capital punishment…but once their conversion is proclaimed, they must be dealt with as traitors to the state.” Apostasy is also specifically addressed in Peace and the Limits of War, published by IIIT and written by Louay Safi, the former Executive Director of IIIT, Malaysia, the Association of Muslim Social Scientists (a proven Muslim Brotherhood entity), and the Executive Director of the Islamic Society of North America’s (ISNA) Leadership Development Council. ISNA was proven to be a Muslim Brotherhood entity and is also an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in U.S. history – HLF. The book is also approved by the Secretary General of ISNA. In it, Mr. Safi notes that individual apostates cannot be killed for a “quiet desertion of personal Islamic duties,” but can be put to death as “just punishment” when the apostate deserts Islam publicly (p. 31).

4. This is a statement of facts regarding this matter:

* There are requirements in Islamic Law regarding someone who deserts Islam
* The Muslim Brotherhood’s objective is the implementation of Islamic Law in the United States
* Rifqa Bary has left Islam and become a Christian
* Rifqa Bary has made statements to FDLE officials and others that her parents have threatened to kill her because she has left Islam
* The Bary’s appear to be adherent to Islamic Law
* The Bary’s appear at an interview with two Muslim Brotherhood representatives doing business as CAIR, a group known to be hostile towards the United States which is also an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in U.S. history
* The Muslim Brotherhood supports the killing of Muslims who publicly leave Islam

5. It is my professional opinion that sufficient Probable Cause exists to believe that Ms Bary’s concerns for her personal safety are based in a realistic and factual understanding of her situation, and, therefore, a further criminal investigation is warranted





A comment (by Cornelius) summed up the situation and problems which this young lady faces from Islam rather aptly:


Rifqa had better prepare an escape plan in case the Florida courts do the unconscionable and attempt to return her to her parents.