CONTINUAL TERROR AGAINST CHRISTIANS BY MUSLIMS IN SO MANY COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD

nigeria churches

church in Nigeria destroyed by Muslims…media is silent

 

Ramadan in Nigeria: Massive Attack on Five Churches, Boko Haram Burnt Five Churches, Over 100 Worshipers Killed During Sunday Service Global Jihad 2014 Nigeria: Jihad, Ethnic Cleansing, Boko Haram 23 Comments

 

Geller calls it “ramadan bombathon”

The jihadists “are still in pursuit of the remaining villagers.” And so the ramadan bombathon is upon us.

 

Geller refers to Obama’s “surrender to Islamic supremacists”

With the advent of the Obama presidency and the attendant surrender to Islamic supremacists, jihadists are slaughtering and conquering with impunity. There is nothing to stop them now. And they know it. Remember, Obama said Boko Haram has “legitimate concerns.” – See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2014/06/ramadan-nigeria-massive-attack-five-churches-boko-haram-burnt-five-churches-killed-worshippers-sunday-service.html/#sthash.wlwxmAD5.dpuf

 

Furthermore Geller describes this horror against Christians by Muslims in Nigeri as “slaughtering and conquering with impunity. There is nothing to stop them now. And they know it”

 

Who is reporting on this? I hear nobody.

 

There is continual terror against Christians in many parts of the worldm above all in Nigeria

 

Who reports? Pamela Geller, Jihadwatch but the main rich Media are silent.

 

Please help us to grow http://www.4international.me so that we can play our part more fully.

 

 

AS 3 JEWISH YOUTH REMAIN KIDNAPPED AND ROCKETS AGAIN RAIN DOWN ON SDEROT LAST NIGHT???

the kidnapping phenomenon of the “Palestinians”
 
 
the same theme of children being kidnapped
 
 

This is an article by a Palestinian Arab which is presently being aired. I think he is a business man. He is very fair towards the Jews and Israel and he falls right into one of our perspectives, that of the perspectives for the Middle East of http://www.4international.me, a perspective that is struggling to make itself known to even a few. We believe that Jews must live alone to be protected from Antisemitism…a simple enough concept but ont he elft we are alone in this This Palestinian Arab man will be a welcome guest and that concept I hope he would agree with…at any rate it would be a test. So it fits with our basic concept. Our concept of “living alone” is rooted in our fear and understanding of Antisemitism

 

(follows interview with a Palestinian Arab and finishes with our thoughts)

 

The three Israeli teenagers abducted June 12: Gilad Shaar, Naftali Frenkel, and Eyal Yifrach.

 

 

Responses such as these should help the world — which has been trying to force a peace agreement with the PA down Israel’s throat — wake up to the reality that the PA is a terrorist organization that has been inciting acts of violence and radicalism, and should be treated as such. Its leaders should be recognized as terrorists who deserve jail rather than a red carpet treatment in Western capitals.

 

While some argue that freedom of speech is sacred, it seems the only freedom of speech the PA allows is the one that incites terrorism.

 

The first thing the world should remember is that the PA is now officially united with Hamas, a terrorist organization that pledges to destroy a sovereign nation, Israel, and establish a Muslim caliphate. Financing the PA now is therefore financing terrorism.

 

Yet, despite uniting with Hamas, the PA will still apparently be receiving generous financing from the U.S., Canada and Europe.

 

The UK, with the best of intentions, offers an average of $135 million a year to the PA for development; nonetheless, the Guardian newspaper reported that the money, always fungible, was instead being used by the PA to finance terrorist imprisoned in Israeli jails — thus inadvertently financing more terrorism.

 

In addition, it is no secret that the PA officials have been stealing hundreds of millions of dollars of the aid money intended to improve the livelihoods of my people, the Palestinians, with no sign that Western aid to the PA ever filters down to the Palestinian public.

 

Instead of financing the PA leaders’ lavish lifestyles, the world might finally start questioning the PA’s institutionalized incitement of terror and hatred to my people which they relay daily through media, education and the religious institutions.

 

Ever since the PA came into existence, it has been keen to mass-produce and institutionalize the hatred of Jews and also the West. With their government-controlled TV shows that teach children how to kill Jews, and textbooks that preach hatred for Israel, the PA and Hamas are directly and fully responsible for each and every terror act committed by Palestinians, including the kidnapping of the three teenagers.

 

Is this what the West is so breathless to support?

 

Ironically, the PA is claiming no responsibility for the kidnappings, however you cannot be running TV, newspapers and social media encouraging terror and the murdering of Jews and then claim that you are innocent when acts of terror happen.

 

Another reason for kidnapping the three teenagers, of course, is also the regular prisoner-release agreements forced on Israel. Gilad Shalit was kidnapped and held for five years then released in a prisoner exchange agreement for more than 1,000 terrorist prisoners who were let out of jail. Such deals have been openly encouraged and blessed by the PA leader. In other words, the PA encourages the kidnappings of Israelis to exchange them with terror prisoners.

 

The world should therefore understand Israel’s position when it recently called off releasing yet more terror prisoners in a deal promoted by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry. These releases just encourage the kidnapping of more Israelis.

 

As a Palestinian, I do not wish for any of my people to be in jail; nonetheless, I cannot sympathize with those who kill children and innocent civilians. I also know that releasing those prisoners in “swaps” sets a bad example, and even encourages more of my people to commit acts of terror: they see they can be released in a few years in a prisoner exchange brokered by the West.

 

Would the U.S. or Europe agree to give its cities and parts of its soil to a terrorist organization to establish a country the way Secretary Kerry has been pushing Israel to give up most of the West Bank and return to pre-1967 borders?

 

Also, if the US or any European country were facing terror attacks from any neighboring country, wouldn’t it seek to build a barrier to protect itself from that country? The U.S. already has a fortified wall along parts of its border with Mexico to stop illegal immigration — an offense not by any means close to any of the terrorist acts that have claimed the lives of thousands of Israeli civilians over the years. Therefore, can the world keep blaming Israel for having a security barrier?

 

Can we Palestinians blame Israel when the barrier never existed before Hamas and the PLO started launching terror attacks on Israel on a daily basis? Yes, the wall looks sad and ugly and depressing, but if Israel’s neighbors proclaim every day that their sole desire is to displace Israel, what else — apart from surrender — can Israel do?

 

We Palestinians know that Israel welcomed us with open arms before the PA came and brought terror-preaching with it. And yes, there have always been constant acts of Palestinian terrorism. But PA terror has became (sic) a major industry — in which terrorists are pampered, protected, financed, employed, and glorified by the PA — with streets, soccer stadiums and summer camps named after them. And Europe breathlessly joins in.

 

Israeli measures towards securing the safety of its citizens as well as that of the Palestinians, have been demonized by the world and the so-called Palestinian sympathizers, who choose to ignore the fact that Palestinians’ lives have become harder because of the terrorists and not because of Israel. A Palestinian businessman, for instance, who frequently passes illegally into Israel to buy his products, said: “Most people are mad at those who kidnapped the kids…[because] When they commit such acts, we rejoice, celebrate for Israel’s suffering, then sit down and worry if we will be allowed into Israel for work and medical treatment. To me, such a kidnapping only destroys the livelihood of my four children. This has to stop, for our own sake.”

 

The Palestinian Authority is a terrorist organization, and its leaders are terrorists who deserve international arrest warrants rather than the red-carpet treatment in Western capitals. The PA has been an inciter of terror; it jeopardizes the safety and livelihoods of Israelis and Palestinians alike.

 

This tragedy should remind the world that the PA — and organizations like it — is a threat to all of us and should not be rewarded with still more funds for terrorist behaviour. For the sake of both Israel and the Palestinians, it is not Israel but the PA that should be boycotted, excluded and even dissolved.

 

SOME THOUGHTS FROMA BROAD

 

Remember here that the BBC calls the ISIL Militants. The BBC does this not once but every single time.

 

The BBC thus creates an image in the mind of the listener. The image is that the ISIL is not a group of terrorists but a group of militants. They have a militancy for a historical reason which is that they are oppressed. That is the  (could we call it subliminal – it is more than subliminal it is very open propaganda) propaganda message poured out day after day by the BBC. The BBC is awash with money and it is paid for by the population. The BBC was talking this very morning on a BBC World Programme of planning to reach half a billion people. A neat trick. The BBC is being paid by the people in order to enslave the minds of those very people. I talk here in an overall and general sense (there IS some good stuff on the BBC)

 

If the BBC thus creates a subliminal message that ISIL is so and so, then what does the BBC do towards Fatah, Hamas and the “Palestinians”?

 

In the various studios of the BBC the “Palestinians” can do no wrong. The “Palestinians” for the BBC are the ultimate “victims” of history.

 

In order to create that picture the BBC has lied about history. The BBC in order to carry off that “The Palestinians are victims” concept has lied about everything (not almost everything but everything) since the beginnings of Zionism.

 

I mean the whole thing! The whole of the history! Insidious lie after insidious lie!

 

It is just dishonest treatment of history by the BBC. Very often it is leaving out of certain aspects or factual narrative. I would say that the BBC are absolute “masters” of this technique.

 

In that latter regard let me tell of one trick or aspect which really gets my rag out!

 

I actually follow this trick as it is used by two reporters whom I follow in a more or less desultory manner, one doing a BBC weekend morning programme the other is a non BBC programme. The trick is this: It is the selecting of a piece of propaganda by SOMEBODY ELSE, the reporter plays the piece of propaganda, but does not comment. This is a method, a very invidious method, a method of distortion.

 

Of course there are millions of communists and revolutionists behind www.4international.me and they are just waiting for the word. So all of those conspiracists who think of communism as the great danger to everything will be very worried to hear that we on 4international have just bought a new inkjet printer. It costs about 60 euros and we thought about it. The cost has not broken me financially but I did think what it could be used for and it is not an offset printer churning out millions of copies per hour. (allow for my twisted sense of humour here)

 

But since that is irony above the real thing that we lack is organization. At this stage we do not want to do much more than tell the truth, first to ourselves, and then to a few more people, but most of all and enduringly to tell the truth to ourselves, and that is hard enough. Not hard in the sense of it being a chore, just difficult.

 

To conclude…On the above remarkable document. He is a Palestinian Arab. He sees the falseness. He articulates it well. But in the end he is using the Jews of Israel also and there are Jews also who in business use Palestinian Arab cheap labour for profit.

 

From that latter concept there has to grow up a layer of Israeli Jews who are using the situation for their own gains. But the truth of the matter and of the situation, a situation both historical and contemporary (what happens day in day out with rockets from Gaza onto Sderot last night), it is that Arab Antisemitism which runs right through the whole situation and land is that Jews and Arabs cannot live together. There MUST be separation for the safety of Jews. To keep your feet on the ground and think and act realistically. Is that the basic answer for the Jews of Israel? I think it is a big part of it.

JEWS FACE ONLY WAR AGAINST US EMPIRE AND AGAINST ISLAMIC JIHAD…THUS NEED TROTSKYIST LEADERSHIP

Britain opposed the Jewish state in 1948 (Haifa) and US Empire is now the enemy of the Jews

 

What Martin Sherman leaves out of this analysis is the most important factor of all. This factor exists in the form of a reality, a certain reality that must be addressed before any other.

 

That factor is the existence in the world of the US Empire and its lapdogs in NATO and the EU.

 

ISIL is important, of course it is but the drive behind ISIL is not only the Islamic Jihad rooted in the Koran, but also (perhaps I could say more and more) it is the actions of Empire with its EU and NATO in tow on the world scene.

 

How far back to go? Well I would certainly go back to the role of the US post 1945 when the US ruling class recruited all of the Nazis into their government and especially into their intelligence services. Edward Snowden is an issue for all Jews and it must be an issue of how Jews can support that American freedom fighter.

 

What WAS the Second World War fought for then? So that the US ruling class could co-opt the Nazis. Is that it?

 

A key part of this growing Empire, the British Government, rather than giving the new state of the Jews a fair wind in 1948, in fact openly brought Nazis into Palestine to fight the Jews.

 

Moving forward a bit who was it that insisted on the PLO being rescued after the PLO was routed in the Lebanon War in 2002? It was the then US President and all of the prestige of Empire which did that. Many Jewish soldiers had laid down their lives for the US President to do that to the Jews.

 

The actual “philosophical” basis for the rescue of the PLO was the propaganda and actions of the Churches and especially of the Vatican

(see http://emperors-clothes.com/vatican/pressure.htm)

 

I have got one, and only one, criticism of the analysis of Martin Sherman because I agree with almost all, but it is a weighty criticism all the same. Sherman is basically asking the key question but not giving any answer: Why are the Jews of Israel, this very significant nation of people, continuing to elect (and I use the word after some thought) douchebags like Netanyahu.

 

Netanyahu seems to have absolutely no backbone at all. I wonder if Netanyahu has been kept alive politically by means of the valiant sacrifice of his brother. But however this man is the wrong man to lead Israel in a period of warfare.

 

The answer which Martin Sherman does not give to the question which is inherent in everything that he writes which is that the Israeli people, a valiant people, continue to elect such douchebags as Netanyahu because (I emphasize most strongly) no other alternative is being offered to the Israeli people.

 

It needs a new leadership (however that can be created I myself thinking that it must be based on Trotskyist principles)

 

Such a leadership will be democratic, centralized, theoretical, a cadre based on history. It will as a first step break up, expel or imprison (with capital punishment restored for crimes against Jews) both Fatah and Hamas

 

The new war of the Jews is actually against two main foes. One of these is a very old enemy of the Jews indeed and that is the forces of Islam and Mohammedan Jihad. But the second is war against Empire, that is against the same Empire which in the 1990s made war against the Serbs ON BEHALF OF THAT JIHAD, and on that basis also removed Saddam, removed Mubarak, Ben Ali and Gadhafi, all of whom were secular dictators, to open the door to precisely the ISIL situation Sherman refers to. My reference above indicates that I believe that the Vatican is central to this Empire. The present Pope Francis is all about drawing closer to Islamic Jihad in Catholic Nigeria, and everywhere that Christians are slaughtered daily.

 

A war on two fronts! Sad as it really is that is the only reality for the Jews. I wish it could be peaceful admiring of the grass growing in your garden but alas cannot be that.

 

JEWS AND ISRAEL MUST BREAK TOTALLY FROM US EMPIRE, THE GREAT AND GRAND PROMOTER OF JIHAD

WHAT IS HAPPENING NOW IN THE MIDDLE EAST? WHAT IS THE US AND EU (EMPIRE) UP TO? WELL SAME AS IN YUGOSLAVIA IN THE 1990s!

 

from the Nazi period this Serb is being beheaded by a crosscut saw by Fascist Croatians

 

heads of Serbs beheaded by Jihadists in Yugoslavia supported by the Empire (Bill Clinton supporting Izetbegovic)
 
Christian priest beheaded by the Jihad (financed and backed by the Empire led by Obama in Syria)

 

FELIX QUIGLEY PLACED THIS COMMENT ON THE MARTIN SHERMAN BLOGS (That is a Jewish Israeli blog and the commenters there were creating a situation where they were leaving out the overall reactionary strategy in the world of Empire, above all were leaving out for the readers of Sherman’s blog the role of Empire in Yugoslavia)

 

 

(begin extracts from Facebook)

 

Felix QuigleyThe lesson of Yugoslavia is that the US (The Empire) sets out deliberately to break up states, and to impose its henchmen in order to keep control. This is what is happening now in Iraq and Syria and none of the comments above reflect that

From Wikipedia “The accords called for NATO administration of Kosovo as an autonomous province within Yugoslavia; a force of 30,000 NATO troops to maintain order in Kosovo; an unhindered right of passage for NATO troops on Yugoslav territory, including Kosovo; and immunity for NATO and its agents to Yugoslav law.

In commentary released to the press, former United States Secretary of State Henry Kissinger declared that:

The Rambouillet text, which called on Serbia to admit NATO troops throughout Yugoslavia, was a provocation, an excuse to start bombing. Rambouillet is not a document that an angelic Serb could have accepted. It was a terrible diplomatic document that should never have been presented in that form.[4]

—Henry Kissinger, Daily Telegraph, 28 June 1999

 
  •  
    Felix Quigley…a further comment on the above words by Kissinger…”Kissinger is right and wrong. It was not a “terrible” document but a real document. the intention of the US (The Empire) was to bomb Yugoslavia and to destroy the Serbs as a nation people, and to have compliant US people in power in all of the former Yugoslavia. THAT is happening now in the countries which surround Israel and the Israelis are asleep, or like Caroline Glick who supported the 2003 war on Saddam, are compliant with US Imperialism…see many articles on this theme on www.4international.me, also on www.tenc.net and on www.hirhome.com

    4international.me

    defending Israel, defending Jews against antisemitism, support for Serbs, unity of Serbs and Jews.

THE SUPPRESSION OF AL JAZEERA AND THE JAILING OF AL JAZEERA JOURNALISTS MUST BE SUPPORTED BY REAL FREEDOM LOVERS

In jailing Al Jazeera journalists like Greste el Sisi is defending the Christians from the Jihad savages

 

The present “Left” denies the Jihad of the Muslim Brothers against Jews and Christians

 

http://www.4international.me takes the political position of backing the military gpvernment of el Sisi in Egypt in its suppression of the Muslim Brotherhood and in its suppression also of Al Jazeera includingm and we stress thism the jailing of its journalists. We do so against ALL “Left” groups on the planet and against American and EU Imperialisms. In backing el Sisi and in urging the suppression totally of the Muslim Brotherhood we are also opposed to all “Human” Rights Groups. We cannot help but note how spineless and opportunist is Netanyahu and all Israeli leaders on the issue.

 

These are some points to consider:

 

 

  1. Egypt is at war with the Muslim Brotherhood
  2. Al Jazeera backs and finances the Muslim Brotherhood
  3. Al Jazeera pretends to be an impartial News Service but is not
  4. Al Jazeera offices in Cairo (that means all of Egypt) closed down July 2013
  5. Al Jazeera journalists … Arrested in a Cairo Hotel end of December 2013 … 6 months later
  6. They had no accreditation
  7. They were there on the basis of Al Jazeera being “neutral” but el Sisi has exploded that lie…That is what the case centres on, that Al Jazeera is neutral
  8. But is Al Jazeera in the war of the Islam Caliphate neutral or was it ever thus! Thus this is the myth that has been exploded
  9. Raised is the issue: Is Egypt really at war with the Muslim Brotherhood, a war which is still being fought?
  10. The “Left” backs Al Jazeera because it has sold out on its revolutionary socialist principles and because the “Left” today IS The Muslim Brotherhood (remember Galloway supporting the Flotilla to Hamas in Gaza)
  11. Exposed here above all is the US advocacy of the Muslim Brotherhood
  12. Also exposed is the spinelessness towards the necessary supporting El Sisi against the Muslim Brotherhood of the lsraeli leaders. Only 4international.me takes a clear position

 

WE MAKE FURTHER POINTS WITH NOTES ADDED FOR YOUR FURTHER READING

Greste was arrested in December of 2013. The office of Al Jazeera in Cairo was closed down in July 2013. The Prosecution against Greste and two others included the relevant point that they had no accreditation. If the military government had closed down the office in July what was Geste doing in Cairo with a full operation going on in a hotel in December? (see note 1)

 

4international has read all of the attacks on el Sisi for the jailing of Greste. But the jailing of Greste is not a thing in itself, an abstract issue of “democracy” because the real issue is that Greste was working for Al Jazeera, and that Al Jazeera is NOT a normal news service, but was engaged in the war of the Muslim Brotherhood against the Egyptian people and especially against Egyptian women and non Muslims such as the Coptic Christians. THAT was the issue in the trial and sentencing of Greste.  (see note 2)

 

The Reuters article on the jailing of Greste is full of all the condemnations of the British, the Dutch, the Americans, Human Rights Watch and the UN. Those condemnations by THOSE tyrants should be enough to tell us that el Sisi is on the right tracks in suppressing Al Jazeera. If all those are on the side of Greste and against el Sisi then we can conclude that el Sisi is on the right track here. But more seriously, the whole of the lies of the ruling establishments concerning Islam are being challenged by the brave el Sisi (see note 3)

 

In fact the conclusion of el Sisi and the great majority of the Egyptians who elected el Sisi was that Al Jazeera was helping a terrorist organization. That is irrefutable! (see note 4)

 

Israelis Jews and all freedom lovers, but not the present “Left” or the BBC who are not freedom lovers, will take careful note of the position of those like Obama and Kerry leading American Imperialism especially (see note 5)

 

 

If Jews are to survive in this world today of deepening economic and political crisis and conflict with growing Antisemitismm and Fascist forces on the “Left”, as well as deep Antisemitic forces in US and EU Imperialisms, then it needs a courageous leadership. On the issue of support  for el Sisi Jewish leaders are cowardly. The Jewish leaders as they stand at present are political cowards, as cowardly as the Jewish leaders who were not prepared to ram home their victory in 1967, after they the Jews had been fighting a war for their very survival, a defensive war against the Muslim Brotherhood. Now their support for el Sisi if you could call it support is niggardly. You will find that every one of these Jewish leaders do not oppose el Sisi but they do not support him either. In fact against the Muslim Brothers the support of the Jews in the whole world should be unconditional. The best formula is a critical support for el Sisi but against the Muslim Brotherhood it is unconditional support (see note 6)

 

 

 

 

NOTES ON ABOVE

 

NOTE 1…Greste was arrested in Cairo with colleagues at the end of December 2013. The interior ministry said the journalists were accused of news reporting which was “damaging to national security”.[9] Greste was imprisoned in Egypt in solitary confinement for a month before any formal charges were made.[10] On 29 January, it emerged that the Egyptian authorities were to charge 20 Al Jazeera journalists, including Greste, of falsifying news and having a negative impact on overseas perceptions of the country.[11] His colleagues, Mohamed Fadel Fahmy and Baher Mohamed, are also imprisoned; the three men were being held in the same cell in early February 2014.[12] The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights has urged the authorities in Egypt to “promptly release” the Al Jazeera staff they are holding in custody.[2]

 

On 21 February, Greste was refused bail and had his court case adjourned until 5 March.[13]

 

On 31 March, he and co-defendants Mohammed Fahmy and Baher Mohammed made a request to a judge during a hearing to be released. [3] During the hearing Greste told the judge: “The idea that I could have an association with the Muslim Brotherhood is frankly preposterous.”[3]

 

On 23 June, Greste was found guilty by the court, and sentenced to seven years in prison. Mohammed Fahmy also received seven years and Baher Mohammed received a sentence of ten years in prison.[14] International reaction was swift and negative. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry was highly critical of the sentences of Greste and his co-workers, terming them “chilling and draconian” and noted he had spoken to Egyptian governmental officials including President Abdul Fattah al-Sisi.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Greste

 

 

 

NOTE 2…Many Egyptians see Al Jazeera as a force determined to destabilise the country, a view that has been encouraged in the local media, which has labelled the journalists “The Marriott Cell” because they worked from a hotel of the U.S.-based chain.

 

A video that appeared on a pro-government channel and spread online, reinforced the view that the journalists had sinister intents, showing their arrest in their hotel room, with close-ups of their computers, cameras and communications equipment.

 

Al Jazeera’s Cairo offices have been closed since July 3 when security forces raided them hours after Mursi was ousted. Criticism of the government and army has virtually vanished from Egyptian media since then.

 

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/23/us-egypt-jazeera-idUSKBN0EY0L720140623

 

NOTE 3…One Dutch woman and two Britons were sentenced to 10 years in absentia on the same charges of aiding a “terrorist group”.

 

Judicial sources told Reuters the verdicts could be appealed before a higher court and a pardon was still possible.

 

Egypt’s public prosecutor last week ordered the release of another Al Jazeera journalist, Abdullah al-Shamy, on health grounds after he spent more than 130 days on hunger strike.

 

Western governments and rights groups have voiced concern over freedom of expression in Egypt since Mursi was ousted. The crackdown has reinforced doubts about Egypt’s democratic credentials three years after an uprising toppled Hosni Mubarak and raised hopes of greater freedoms.

 

The case comes after a similar outcry over mass death sentences being handed down to Brotherhood supporters.

 

“Egypt’s reputation, and especially the reputation of its judiciary as an independent institution, are at stake,” U.N. human rights chief Navi Pillay said. “There is a risk that miscarriage of justice is becoming the norm in Egypt.”

 

Britain, whose ambassador attended the hearing, said it was summoning the Egyptian ambassador to protest.

 

“Freedom of the press is a cornerstone of a stable and prosperous society,” Foreign Secretary William Hague said.

 

The Dutch foreign minister also summoned Egypt’s ambassador. Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop said her government was “deeply dismayed that any sentence was imposed” and was “appalled by the severity of it”.

 

“The Egyptian foreign ministry strongly rejects any comment from a foreign party that casts doubt on the independence of the Egyptian judiciary and the justice of its verdicts,” the foreign ministry said in a statement.

 

 

STRATEGIC PARTNER

 

Human Rights Watch said: “These… verdicts are a stark admission that in today’s Egypt, simply practicing professional journalism is a crime and that the new constitution’s guarantees of free expression are not worth the paper they are written on.”

 

Egyptian officials have said the case is not about freedom of expression and that the journalists raised suspicions by operating without proper accreditation.

IBID

 

 

NOTE 4…Three Al Jazeera journalists were jailed for seven years each by an Egyptian judge on Monday, in what Washington called “chilling, draconian sentences” that must be reversed.

 

Cairo defended the journalists’ convictions – for aiding a “terrorist organisation” – and rejected the widespread condemnation as “interference in its internal affairs”.

 

The three, who all denied the charge of working with the now banned Muslim Brotherhood, included Australian Peter Greste and Canadian-Egyptian national Mohamed Fahmy, Cairo bureau chief of Al Jazeera English.

 

The third defendant, Egyptian producer Baher Mohamed, was given an extra three years for possessing a single bullet, at the hearing attended by Western diplomats, some of whose governments summoned Egypt’s ambassadors over the case.

 

The men have been held at Egypt’s notorious Tora Prison for six months, with the case becoming a rallying point for rights groups and news organisations around the world.

 

They were detained in late December and charged with helping “a terrorist group” – a reference to the Muslim brotherhood – by broadcasting lies that harmed national security and supplying money, equipment and information to a group of Egyptians.

 

The Brotherhood was banned and declared a terrorist group after the army deposed elected Islamist president Mohamed Mursi in July following mass protests against his rule. The Brotherhood says it is a peaceful organisation.

 

Al Jazeera, whose Qatari owners back the Brotherhood and have been at odds with Egypt’s leadership, said the ruling defied “logic, sense and any semblance of justice”. “There is only one sensible outcome now. For the verdict to be overturned, and justice to be recognised by Egypt,” Al Jazeera English managing director Al Anstey said in a statement.

 

The ruling came a day after U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry met newly elected Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi in Cairo and raised the issue of the journalists.

IBID

 

 

NOTE 5…On Monday, Kerry said he called Egypt’s foreign minister to register his “serious displeasure” at the “chilling, draconian sentences”.

 

“Injustices like these simply cannot stand if Egypt is to move forward in the way that President al-Sisi and Foreign Minister (Sameh) Shoukry told me just yesterday that they aspire to see their country advance,” Kerry said in a statement.

IBID

 

NOTE 6…For Egypt’s neighbor Israel, security and stability are the top concerns. In recent pre-election statements, El-Sisi has said he would honor the 1979 Israeli-Egyptian peace treaty as president.

“I respect all international accords, including the treaty with Israel,” he said.

Israel and Egypt have a shared interest in cracking down on Islamic terror groups in the Sinai, and in targeting the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas, which is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood.

“Abdel Fattah El-Sisi is Egypt’s strong man right now and has been fighting against radical Islam and against the Muslim Brothers. This is very positive both for Egypt, but also for Israel and the entire Middle East,” former Israeli Ambassador to Egypt Zvi Mazel told JNS.org in January.

“We shouldn’t go out on the roofs and cry out in favor of El-Sisi. But what is going on in Egypt is positive for Israel, and you cannot deny it,” he added.

http://www.algemeiner.com/2014/05/28/besides-brutal-suppression-of-muslim-brotherhood-el-sisis-plans-for-egypt-are-unclear/

(by FQ…in fact nothing could show the reactionary Jewish Israeli leaders better. That is exactly what the Jewish leaders in Israel and int he whole Diaspora especially in America and Britain should do. They should go on the roofs and cry out for El Sisi against the Muslim Brotherhood)

 

 

 

BRITISH AND IRISH ARE NOW SLAVES OF ISLAM…ISIS “RETURNERS” WILL MASS MURDER IN BOTH COUNTRIES

4INTERNATIONAL

 

There is not a thing the British ruling classes can do. From royalty down they are slaves of Islam. At stake are the lives of so many innocent and poor (by now) Britons and Irish too. The Muslim enclaves are well established and if you attack Islam you are labelled a racist from all sides especially the Churches and the “Left”

There is really nothing to stop this and it will take a totally revolutionary process but leadership on the left is absent and the present “Left” are covering for Islam. Many will die at the hands of these ISIS in Britain and Europe

A party needs to be built on the left that will concéntrate on teaching the youth what is Islam, especially its historym with special emphasis on Spain which is the centre of so many lies a la Karen Armstrong. Works of the early writers on this must be fundamental in this education and to counter the lies of Armstrong.

But in the meantime the British ruling class elites have ALREADY sacrificed the lives of thousands. Is this stoppable no! The proof is to google under pictures “ISIS Iraq” and that is your answer. They are primed to kill and will kill.

 

 

I AGREE WITH THIS ASSESSMENT BY PAMELLA HELLER (PAMELA HAS BEEN BANNED FROM ENTERING BRITAIN ALONG WITH ROBERT SPENCER WHICH MAKES MY POINT ABOVE)

 

ISIL Jihadists move against Lebanon and Jordan and ….

levant

 

As the Obama admin pretends jihad is a figment of the conspiratorial imagination of “fringe” counter jihadists and scrub our counter terror materials his fantasy – the big lie – is exploding and isn’t containing itself to Syria and now Iraq. It’s not a news story that is going to disappear. ISIL has just begun.

The media had amended the name of the Islamic army tearing through Syria and Iraq ISIS (Islamic State of Suria and Iraq). But the correct name is Iis ISIL (Islamic State in the Levant). What is the the Levant? The geographical area they mean to rule. The Levant includes Egypt, Lebanon Nigeria Central African Republic Thailand Burma ritz Levant is the following countries and they mean to seize it.

And it’s not ISIL that’s the problem, it’s the ideology.

Countries and regions located in the Levant region. (Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Jordan, Cyprus,  and Hatay.

Members of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria are claiming on jihadist websites that the group is preparing an operation in which more than 15,000 of its militants will storm into Jordan, WND is reporting.

– See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2014/06/jihadists-move-lebanon-jordan.html/#sthash.LdrFtFjj.dpuf

GLICK BELMAN AND NETANYAHU CUT ACROSS THE SHARON OPPOSITION TO THE 2003 BUSH WAR ON SADDAM, THUS BETRAYING ISRAEL

 

 

The key issue is the 2003 war against Saddam. Just yesterday the Israeli regime led by Netanyahu has launched attacks on Assad which has meant the Fascist Islamist opposition to Assad has gained.

(Israel struck nine Syrian targets in response to boy’s death, and as a boost for the rebel bid for Quneitra

 
DEBKAfile Special ReportJun 23, 2014, 3:36 AM (IDT)

Israel carried out nine strikes against Syrian military targets after midnight Monday, June 23, in retaliation for a Kornet rocket attack which killed an Israeli boy, and injured two others a few hours earlier. They were conducted by air and by Spike NLOS anti-tank missiles (Tamuz), against the Syrian 90th Brigade command center in Quneitra and three battalions

But back in the years before the pivotal 2003 war on Saddam Netanyahu was doing the very same thing, as we will see. This was also the position of Caroline Glick and Ted Belman of Israpundit. The actions of all of these people, all Jews, opened the door it Jihad int he world and in the Middle East that may well threaten as never before the Jewish people and Israel.)

 

We have seen in these 4international articles over the past few days that Israeli politicians around Sharon were totally opposed to the Bush War

 

http://4international.me/2014/06/20/the-barbarism-brought-on-by-bush-glick-and-blair-overthrowing-saddam/

 

(plus other articles in the past few days, including one from 2008 on http://4international.me/2008/09/01/do-not-pin-iraq-onto-the-jews-and-israelsharon-opposed-the-war/)

 

Thus in 2003 and the years leading up to the Bush War on Saddam this critical situation for Jews as brewing. The War in 2003 created the situation where THE LEADER OF ISRAEL Arik Sharon,  was telling Bush that he was opposed to the War. (Just read my article to see how explicit and prescient was Sharon)

 

But there were MANY OTHER JEWISH FORCES who were working apart from Sharon, meaning apart from the Israeli Government, and who were cutting right across Sharon.

 

They were:

Certainly Caroline Glick

Certainly Ted Belman of Israpundit. Belman had a whole line about US and BUSH recreating the world)

Certainly and above all Netanyahu

 

On this we now turn to Netanyahu and here we introduce an extract from Wikipedia for you to consider. Note that Buchanan is correct when he refers to Perle, Feith and Wurmsur (But there were many others) (I am opposed to Buchanan on a critical issue, Buchanan is silent on what we say about the opposition of Sharon to the war on Saddam and he is silent because he is essentially Antisemitic)

 

I have already mentioned Glick and Belman. But go into the records and there were more. Thus there is within Jews today a battle going on. There are those like Glick and Pamela Geller, plus many more who are really communist haters and who will do anything in that regard on behalf of US Imperialism

 

Now this weekend we have Netanyahu cheered on by Belman who throws Israel and the IDF against Assad, which is like a stab in the back against all those Christians and other minorities who support Assad against the Jihad.

 

I have just looked at the sites of Pamela Geller and at Israpundit and they are silent, which means they support Netanyahu in this ominous development. It is back to the 2003 Bush War on Saddam

 

Read also very carefully the remarks by Ian Buruma in the pivotal New York Times. Read this very carefully. See how Buruma has described the situation. The image created is that the US and Israel are together in this horrific development the War to remove Saddam

 

THEY ARE ALL TOGETHER except for one Little detail … we now know that the Israeli Government under Sharon was opposed, AIPAC was opposed, the spokespeople for Sharon in America were opposed and were telling all Jews coming to America to OPPOSE THIS WAR

 

But the Israeli Government was surrounded and was bushwhacked by the NeoCons which also were made up by Glick and Belman, and Geller carries this on in the present.

 

Can Israel win today with these people still around and doing the same thing in different forms? No it cannot win. It is being betrayed.

 

(Start extract from Wikipedia here)

In March 2003 Patrick J. Buchanan, referring to the 2003 invasion of Iraq and the report, wrote that “Their plan, which urged Israel to re-establish ‘the principle of preemption,’ has now been imposed by Perle, Feith, Wurmser & Co. on the United States.”[4]

Ian Buruma wrote in August 2003 in the New York Times that:[5]

Douglas Feith and Richard Perle advised Netanyahu, who was prime minister in 1996, to make “a clean break” from the Oslo accords with the Palestinians. They also argued that Israeli security would be served best by regime change in surrounding countries. Despite the current mess in Iraq, this is still a commonplace in Washington. In Paul Wolfowitz‘s words, “The road to peace in the Middle East goes through Baghdad.” It has indeed become an article of faith (literally in some cases) in Washington that American and Israeli interests are identical, but this was not always so, and “Jewish interests” are not the main reason for it now.

Buruma continues:[5]

What we see, then, is not a Jewish conspiracy, but a peculiar alliance of evangelical Christians, foreign-policy hard-liners, lobbyists for the Israeli government and neoconservatives, a number of whom happen to be Jewish. But the Jews among them—Perle, Wolfowitz, William Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard, et al.—are more likely to speak about freedom and democracy than about Halakha (Jewish law). What unites this alliance of convenience is a shared vision of American destiny and the conviction that American force and a tough Israeli line on the Arabs are the best ways to make the United States strong, Israel safe and the world a better place.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Clean_Break:_A_New_Strategy_for_Securing_the_Realm